Relationship between effective blood flow rate and clinical outcomes in maintenance hemodialysis patients: a single-center study.

The association between blood flow rate (BFR) and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) is inconclusive. This retrospective study included 175 patients undergoing MHD treatment between July 2015 and March 2022, divided into two groups based on time-averaged effective blood flow rate (eBFR) median value. We investigated arteriovenous fistula (AVF) outcomes and the association of eBFR with all-cause mortality and new major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Mean ± SD and median time-averaged eBFR values were 276 ± 24 and 275 mL/min, respectively. After adjusting for relevant factors including age, sex, vintage, diabetes, CVD, receiving hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatment and spKt/V, Cox models indicated a low time-averaged eBFR (≤ 275 ml/min) was associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 14.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.14-64.1) and new MACE (HR 3.76; 95% CI, 1.91-7.40) in MHD patients. Continuous Cox models demonstrated each 20 ml/min increase in eBFR linked to a 63% decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.23-0.59) and a 38% decrease in the occurrence of new MACE (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.46-0.84). There was no significant difference in AVF outcomes between the two groups. Our study noted higher eBFR (>275 mL/min) is associated with lower risks of both all-cause mortality and new MACE compared with low eBFR (≤275 mL/min). Increased eBFR is not associated with a higher risk of AVF failure.

Hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion for uremic toxin removal in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To delineate the efficacy and safety profile of hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) for uremic toxin removal in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). METHODS: Patients who have been on MHD for a period of at least 3 months were enrolled. Each subject underwent one HFR and one hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatment. Blood samples were collected before and after a single HFR or HDF treatment to test uremic toxin levels and to calculate clearance rate. The primary efficacy endpoint was to compare uremic toxin levels of indoxyl sulfate (IS), λ-free light chains (λFLC), and ß2-microglobulin (ß2-MG) before and after HFR treatment. Secondary efficacy endpoints was to compare the levels of urea, interleukin-6 (IL-6), P-cresol, chitinase-3-like protein 1 (YKL-40), leptin (LEP), hippuric acid (HPA), trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) before and after HFR treatment. The study also undertook a comparative analysis of uremic toxin clearance between a single HFR and HDF treatment. Meanwhile, the lever of serum albumin and branched-chain amino acids before and after a single HFR or HDF treatment were compared. In terms of safety, the study was meticulous in recording vital signs and the incidence of adverse events throughout its duration. RESULTS: The study enrolled 20 patients. After a single HFR treatment, levels of IS, λFLC, ß2-MG, IL-6, P-cresol, YKL-40, LEP, HPA, TMAO, ADMA, TNF-α, and FGF23 significantly decreased (p < 0.001 for all). The clearance rates of λFLC, ß2-MG, IL-6, LEP, and TNF-α were significantly higher in HFR compared to HDF (p values: 0.036, 0.042, 0.041, 0.019, and 0.036, respectively). Compared with pre-HFR and post-HFR treatment, levels of serum albumin, valine, and isoleucine showed no significant difference (p > 0.05), while post-HDF, levels of serum albumin significantly decreased (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: HFR treatment effectively eliminates uremic toxins from the bloodstream of patients undergoing MHD, especially protein-bound toxins and large middle-molecule toxins. Additionally, it retains essential physiological compounds like albumin and branched-chain amino acids, underscoring its commendable safety profile.

Hemodiafiltration: a synergy yet to be convincing.

The desperate attempt to improve mortality, morbidity, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in patients on hemodialysis has led to multiple attempts to improve the different modes, frequencies, and durations of dialysis sessions in the last few decades. Nothing has been more appealing than the combination of diffusion and convection in the form of hemodiafiltration. Despite the concrete evidence of better clearance of middle weight molecules and better hemodynamic stability, tangible evidence to support the universal adoption is still at a distance. Survival benefits seen in selected groups who are likely to tolerate hemodiafiltration with better vascular access and with lower comorbid burden, need to be extended to real life dialysis patients who are older than the population studied and have significantly higher comorbid burden. Technical demands of initiation hemodiafiltration, the associated costs, and the incremental benefits targeted, along with patient-reported outcomes, need to be explored further before recommending hemodiafiltration as the mode of choice.

Clinical Efficacy and Long-term Prognosis of High Flux Hemodialysis Combined with Different Frequency Hemodiafiltration in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Uremia.

INTRODUCTION: To analyze the clinical efficacy and long-term prognosis of high flux hemodialysis (HFHD) combined with different frequency hemodiafiltration (HDF) in uremic patients. METHODS: 86 middle-aged and elderly patients with uremia were divided into the HF group (HFHD combined with high-frequency HDF) and the LF group (HFHD combined with low-frequency HDF). The changes between the two groups in various indicators after 12 months of dialysis and the survival rate at 5 years of follow-up were compared. We used SPSS 25.0 software for data analysis. RESULTS: The differences of the levels of serum albumin, hemoglobin and transferrin in HF Group was significantly higher than LF Group before and after treatment (P < .05). The differences of the levels and clearance rate of calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, ß2-microglobulin and cysteine protease inhibitor C in the patients' blood after dialysis were significantly higher in HF Group than in LF Group (P < .05). The all-cause mortality rate, new cardiovascular event rate, new cerebrovascular event rate, and new infection event rate of HF Group were significantly lower than those of LFHD group, respectively (P < .05). The LF Group had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality events, new cardiovascular cerebrovascular and infectious events than the HF Group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: 1 week/time HDF combined with HFHD can more effectively eliminate the vascular related toxins in middle-aged and elderly patients with uremia, improve their nutritional status, treatment effect, and long-term prognosis.  DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.7864.

Hemodiafiltration for children with stage 5 chronic kidney disease: technical aspects and outcomes.

Despite significant medical and technical improvements in the field of dialysis, the morbidity and mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 on dialysis remains extremely high. Hemodiafiltration (HDF), a dialysis method that combines the two main principles of hemodialysis (HD) and hemofiltration-diffusion and convection-has had a positive impact on survival when delivered with a high convective dose. Improved outcomes with HDF have been attributed to the following factors: HDF removes middle molecular weight uremic toxins including inflammatory cytokines, increases hemodynamic stability, and reduces inflammation and oxidative stress compared to conventional HD. Two randomized trials in adults have shown improved survival with HDF compared to high-flux HD. A large prospective cohort study in children has shown that HDF attenuated the progression of cardiovascular disease, improved bone turnover and growth, reduced inflammation, and improved blood pressure control compared to conventional HD. Importantly, children on HDF reported fewer headaches, dizziness, and cramps; had increased physical activity; and improved school attendance compared to those on HD. In this educational review, we discuss the technical aspects of HDF and results from pediatric studies, comparing outcomes on HDF vs. conventional HD. Convective volume, the cornerstone of treatment with HDF and a key determinant of outcomes in adult randomized trials, is discussed in detail, including the practical aspects of achieving an optimal convective volume.

Controversy on the CONVINCE study findings: the PRO take.

The CONVINCE study, recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine, reveals a groundbreaking 23% reduction in the relative risk of all-cause mortality among end-stage kidney patients undergoing high convective volume hemodiafiltration. This significant finding challenges the conventional use of high-flux hemodialysis and offers hope for improving outcomes in chronic kidney disease patients. While some controversies surround the study's findings, including concerns about generalizability and the causes of death, it is essential to acknowledge the study's design and its main outcomes. The CONVINCE study, part of the HORIZON 2020 project, enrolled 1360 patients and demonstrated the superiority of hemodiafiltration in reducing all-cause mortality overall, as well as in specific patient subgroups (elderly, short vintage, non-diabetic, and those without cardiac issues). Interestingly, it was shown that hemodiafiltration had a protective effect against infection, including COVID-19. Future research will address sustainability, dose scaling effects, identification of subgroups especially likely to benefit and cost-effectiveness. However, for now, the findings strongly support a broader adoption of hemodiafiltration in renal replacement therapy, marking a significant advancement in the field.

An evaluation of different dilution modes on circuit lifespan during continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration without anticoagulation.

BACKGROUND: Circuit clotting remains a major problem during continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), particularly in patients with contraindications to anticoagulant use. We hypothesized that the different options of alternative replacement fluid infusion sites might affect circuit lifespan. However, research-based evidence supporting an optimal replacement fluid infusion strategy is limited. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of three dilution modes (pre-dilution, post-dilution, and pre- to post-dilution) on circuit lifespan during continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted between December 2019 and December 2020. Patients requiring CKRT were enrolled to receive pre-dilution, post-dilution, or pre- to post-dilution fluid infusion with CVVHDF. The primary endpoint was circuit lifespan, and the secondary outcomes included the clinical parameters of patients, such as changes in serum creatinine (Scr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, 28-day all-cause mortality, and length of stay. For all patients included in this study, only the first circuit used was recorded. RESULTS: Among the 132 patients enrolled in this study, 40 were in the pre-dilution mode, 42 were in the post-dilution mode, and 50 were in the pre- to post-dilution mode. The mean circuit lifespan was significantly longer in the pre- to post-dilution group (45.72 h, 95% CI, 39.75-51.69 h) than in the pre-dilution group (31.58 h, 95% CI, 26.33-36.82 h) and the post-dilution group (35.20 h, 95% CI, 29.62-40.78 h). There was no significant difference between the pre- and post-dilution group circuit lifespan (p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a significant difference between the three dilution modes (p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in terms of changes in the Scr and BUN levels, admission day, and 28-day all-cause mortality among the three dilution groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The pre- to post-dilution mode significantly prolonged circuit lifespan but did not reduce Scr and BUN levels, compared with the pre-dilution and post-dilution modes during CVVHDF when no anticoagulants were used.

Do patients dialysing with higher ultrafiltration rates report more intradialytic symptoms and longer postdialysis recovery times?

BACKGROUND: Many hemodialysis (HD) patients report intradialytic symptoms, and take time to recover postdialysis. To improve quality of life, patient groups have highlighted the need to reduce postdialysis fatigue and other peridialytic symptoms. As compartmental shifts of fluid during dialysis have been proposed to cause peridialytic symptoms we investigated whether patients dialysing with higher ultrafiltration rates (UFR) reported more intradialytic symptoms and recovery times. METHODS: We reviewed the hospital records of HD patients who completed a self-reported intradialytic symptom questionnaire, using a visual analogue scale, who had contemporaneous midweek pre- and postdialysis segmental bioimpedance measurements. RESULTS: Six hundred and five patients returned the peridialytic symptom questionnaire with pre- and postdialysis bioimpedance measurements. The majority were male (64.8%), mean age 64.2 ± 15.6 years, duration of dialysis treatment 26.8 (10.7-59.2) months, 85% treated by hemodiafiltration and mean dialysate temperature 35.4 ± 0.4°C. We divided patients into terciles according to UFR adjusted for weight, and there was a greater fall in the ratio of extracellular water (ECW) to total body water (TBW) postdialysis in the nonfistula arm from the lower to middle to higher tercile (0.8 (0-1.54) vs. 1.28 (0.52-1.85) vs. 1.54 (0.78-2.52)), trunk (1.5 (0.74-2.27) vs. 1.53 (0.99-2.2) vs. 1.98 (1.18-2.66)), left leg (1.56 (0.49-2.25) vs. 1.77 (1.24-2.43) vs. 2.08 (1.18-2.95)), lower versus higher tercile p < 0.05. However, no differences in intradialytic symptoms or postdialysis recovery times between the UFR terciles were observed. CONCLUSION: There were no differences in self-reported intradialytic symptoms or postdialysis recovery times with differing UFRs, despite changes in intracompartmental fluid shifts as measured by changes in ECW/TBW.

Anti-Clogging Effect of Continuous Hemodiafiltration With Blood Recirculation.

Pediatric dialysis requires low flow from the body, but greater flow is needed to prevent clogging. As a solution, we developed a new continuous hemodiafiltration system with blood recirculation (CHDF-R), which enables separate settings for blood flow from the body and to the hemofilter. We compared CHDF-R with conventional continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) of bovine plasma and blood by monitoring the transmembrane pressure (TMP) and observing the hemofilter membrane surface. When using bovine plasma, the postdialysis TMP with CHDF-R was significantly lower than with CHDF (median CHDF, 23.7; median CHDF-R, 18.1; p = 0.029). Likewise, when using bovine blood, the postdialysis TMP was also significantly lower with CHDF-R than with CHDF (median CHDF, 150; median CHDF-R, 100; p = 0.029). Moreover, the area of clogged membrane was significantly smaller with CHDF-R than with CHDF, and the inner membrane surface showed less material deposition with CHDF-R than CHDF. CHDF-R thus appears to suppress accumulation of clogging substances by producing higher shear stress within hollow fiber membranes.

Effects of high-flux hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration on the mortality of patients with end-stage kidney disease: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: High-flux hemodialysis (HFHD) is widely used in hemodialysis centers and is the mode of hemodialysis actively recommended by the guidelines. Additionally, hemodiafiltration (HDF) is widely used in clinical practice. However, there are some inconsistencies in the results of studies on the effects of HDF and HFHD, which has caused controversy regarding which of these two dialysis modalities to select. OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of HFHD and HDF on the survival of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases was conducted, focusing on cohort studies and randomized controlled trials on hemodialysis in patients with ESKD using HFHD or HDF. A meta-analysis of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 software, and fixed and random effect models were applied according to the heterogeneity results. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies, including six cohort studies and seven randomized controlled trials, were included in the final analysis. The results revealed that HFHD had no statistically significant effect on the all-cause mortality (odds ratio (OR): 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86, 1.57) or cardiovascular mortality (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.64, 1.15) of patients with ESKD. However, compared with HDF, HFHD reduced the infection mortality rate (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with HDF, HFHD has no obvious benefits for all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality in patients with ESKD, but reduced risk of infection-related death.

Acute myeloma kidney and SARS-COV2 infection with dialysis need: never say never - a case report.

BACKGROUND: Older individuals with multiple comorbidities and especially patients with multiple myeloma are at higher risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2. When patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are also affected by SARS-CoV-2 the time to start immunosuppressants is still a clinical dilemma especially when urgent hemodialysis is required for acute kidney injury (AKI). CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of an 80-year-old woman who was diagnosed with AKI in MM. The patient began hemodiafiltration (HDF) with free light chain removal combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone. The reduction of free light chains concurrently was obtained by means of HDF using poly ester polymer alloy (PEPA) high-flux filter: 2 PEPA filters were used in series during each 4-h length HDF session. A total of 11 sessions was carried out. The hospitalization was complicated with acute respiratory failure caused by SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia successfully treated with both pharmacotherapy and respiratory support. Once the respiratory status stabilized MM treatment was resumed. The patient was discharged in stable condition after 3 months of hospitalization. The follow up showed significant improvement of the residual renal function which allowed interruption of hemodialysis (HD). CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of patients affected by MM, AKI, and SARS-CoV-2 should not discourage the attending physicians to offer the adequate treatment. The cooperation of different specialists can lead to a positive outcome in those complicated cases.

Effect of Hemodiafiltration or Hemodialysis on Mortality in Kidney Failure.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that patients with kidney failure may benefit from high-dose hemodiafiltration as compared with standard hemodialysis. However, given the limitations of the various published studies, additional data are needed. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, multinational, randomized, controlled trial involving patients with kidney failure who had received high-flux hemodialysis for at least 3 months. All the patients were deemed to be candidates for a convection volume of at least 23 liters per session (as required for high-dose hemodiafiltration) and were able to complete patient-reported outcome assessments. The patients were assigned to receive high-dose hemodiafiltration or continuation of conventional high-flux hemodialysis. The primary outcome was death from any cause. Key secondary outcomes were cause-specific death, a composite of fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular events, kidney transplantation, and recurrent all-cause or infection-related hospitalizations. RESULTS: A total of 1360 patients underwent randomization: 683 to receive high-dose hemodiafiltration and 677 to receive high-flux hemodialysis. The median follow-up was 30 months (interquartile range, 27 to 38). The mean convection volume during the trial in the hemodiafiltration group was 25.3 liters per session. Death from any cause occurred in 118 patients (17.3%) in the hemodiafiltration group and in 148 patients (21.9%) in the hemodialysis group (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with kidney failure resulting in kidney-replacement therapy, the use of high-dose hemodiafiltration resulted in a lower risk of death from any cause than conventional high-flux hemodialysis. (Funded by the European Commission Research and Innovation; CONVINCE Dutch Trial Register number, NTR7138.).

Minimized Hemodiafiltration for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Infants.

BACKGROUND: Fluid overload is a serious complication in the treatment of infants with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Volume overload leads to prolonged ECMO therapy if left untreated. The renal replacement therapy of choice in pediatric patients is peritoneal dialysis or conventional dialysis using a "large" hemofiltration machine via a Shaldon catheter or directly connected to the ECMO system. This study describes the implementation of a novel minimized hemodiafiltration (HDF) system in pediatric patients on ECMO. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 13 infants up to 5 kg who underwent 15 veno-arterial (V-A) ECMO runs with HDF. A minimized HDF system is integrated into an existing ECMO system (18-mL priming volume), connected post-oxygenation to the venous line, before the ECMO pump. Two infusion pumps are attached to the inlet and outlet of the hemofilter to control the HDF system.In addition to retention values (creatine and urea) at six defined time points, flow rates, dialysis parameters, and volume withdrawal were examined, as well as the number of HDF system changes. RESULTS: With a mean ECMO runtime of 156 hours, the HDF system was utilized for 131 hours. The mean blood flow through the hemofilter was 192 mL/min. The mean dialysate flow was 170 mL/h, with a mean volume deprivation of 39 mL/h. The HDF system was changed once in seven cases and twice in three cases. CONCLUSION: There were no complications with the minimized HDF system in all 15 applications. It allows safe patient volume management when treating infants with ECMO, with effective elimination of urinary substances.

Physical intradialytic patient-reported outcome measures in haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration: A cross-over study.

AIM: Standard haemodialysis (sHD) is associated with a poor survival and marked adverse intradialytic patient-reported outcome measures (ID-PROMs). Whereas physical ID-PROMs (PID-PROMs) are alleviated by cool dialysate (cHD), survival is prolonged by haemodiafiltration (HDF). So far, PID-PROMs are not prospectively compared between HD and HDF. METHODS: To assess whether PID-PROMs and thermal perception differ between sHD, cHD, low volume HDF (lvHDF) and high volume HDF (hvHDF), 40 patients were cross-over randomized to each modality for 2 weeks. Dialysate temperature (Td ) was 36.5°C, except in cHD (Td 35.5°C). Target convection volumes were 15 L in lvHDF and ≥ 23 L in hvHDF. PID-PROMs were evaluated with a modified Dialysis Symptom Index (mDSI) and thermal perception with the Visual Analogue Scale Thermal Perception (VAS-TP). Tb and room temperature were measured as well. RESULTS: Except for the item 'feeling cold' during cHD (p = .01), PID-PROMs did not differ between modalities, but varied markedly between patients (11/13 items, p < .05). Tb increased in sHD, lvHDF, and hvHDF (+0.30, 0.35, 0.38°C, respectively, all p < .0005), but remained stable in cHD (+0.04°C, p = .43). Thermal perception remained unaltered in sHD and both HDF modalities, but shifted towards cold in cHD (p = .007). CONCLUSION: (1) PID-PROMs did not differ between modalities, but varied markedly between patients. Hence, PID-PROMs are largely patient-dependent. (2) While Tb increased in sHD, lvHDF and hvHDF, thermal perception did not change. Yet, whereas Tb remained unaltered in cHD, cold perception emerged. Hence, as for bothersome cold sensations, cHD should be avoided in perceptive individuals.

Sodium flux during hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration treatment of acute kidney injury: Effects of dialysate and infusate sodium concentration at 140 and 145 mmol/L.

BACKGROUND: A higher sodium (Na) dialysate concentration is recommended during renal replacement therapy (RRT) of acute kidney injury (AKI) to improve intradialytic hemodynamic tolerance, but it may lead to Na loading to the patient. We aimed to evaluate Na flux according to Na dialysate and infusate concentrations at 140 and 145 mmol/L during hemodialysis (HD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF). METHODS: Fourteen AKI patients that underwent consecutive HD or HDF sessions with Na dialysate/infusate at 140 and 145 mmol/L were included. Per-dialytic flux of Na was estimated using mean sodium logarithmic concentration including diffusive and convective influx. We compared the flux of sodium between HD140 and 145, and between HDF140 and 145. RESULTS: Nine HD140, ten HDF140, nine HD145, and 11 HDF145 sessions were analyzed. A Na gradient from the dialysate/replacement fluid to the patient was observed with dialysate/infusate Na at 145 mmol/L in both HD and HDF (p = 0.01). The comparison of HD145 to HD140 showed that higher Na dialysate induced a diffusive Na gradient to the patient (163 mmol vs. -25 mmol, p = 0.004) and that of HDF145 to -140 (211 vs. 36 mmol, p = 0.03) as well. Intradialytic hemodynamic tolerance was similar across all RRT sessions. CONCLUSIONS: During both HD and HDF, a substantial Na loading occurred with a Na dialysate and infusate at 145 mmol/L. This Na loading is smaller in HDF with Na dialysate and infusate concentration at 140 mmol/L and inversed with HD140. Clinical and intradialytic hemodynamic tolerance was fair regardless of Na dialysate and infusate.

Efficacy and Safety of the Medium Cut-Off Elisio HX Dialyzer.

INTRODUCTION: The medium cut-off Elisio HX dialyzer by Nipro became commercially available in Europe in 2021, but there are still no reports of in vivo data. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of it compared with previously evaluated hemodialysis (HD), expanded HD (HDx), and postdilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatments. METHODS: A prospective study was carried out on 18 patients who underwent 5 dialysis sessions: FX80 Cordiax in HD, Elisio H19 in HD, Elisio HX19 in HDx, Theranova 400 in HDx, and FX80 Cordiax in HDF. The reduction ratios of urea, creatinine, ß2-microglobulin, myoglobin, kappa FLC, prolactin, α1-microglobulin, α1-acid glycoprotein, lambda FLC, and albumin were compared. Dialysate albumin loss was measured. RESULTS: The comparison between the different dialysis modalities revealed no difference for small molecules, but HDx and HDF were significantly more efficient than HD for medium and large molecule removal. The efficacy of Elisio HX19 dialyzer in HDx was similar to the Theranova 400, superior to both dialyzers in HD, and slightly lower than HDF. Albumin losses in dialysate with HD dialyzers were less than 1 g, but between 1.5 and 2.5 g in HDx and HDF. The global removal score (GRS) values with HDx treatments were statistically significantly higher than those with HD. The highest GRS was obtained with the helixone dialyzer in HDF. CONCLUSIONS: The new MCO dialyzer, Elisio HX, performs with excellent behavior and tolerance. It represents an upgrade compared to their predecessor and is very close to the removal capacity of HDF treatment.

Middle-size molecule clearance as measured by ß2-microglobulin in high-flux versus low-flux dialysis and hemodiafiltration: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Whereas most studies to date have mainly concentrated on the comparison between high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF), or HFHD and low-flux hemodialysis (LFHD) in relation to the clearance of ß2-microglobulin (ß2M) in HD patients, there have been few related to combined HFHD and HDF therapy. To compare the clearance of middle-sized molecules as measured by ß2M in HFHD versus LFHD and HDF. METHODS: A prospective, single-center, open-label, observer-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University in China. Patients received either HFHD or LFHD and HDF 3 times a week with follow-ups at one and 3 months. The primary endpoint was the clearance of ß2M at 3 months. The secondary endpoints included hemodialysis-related adverse events, changes in anemia, states of nutrition, and inflammatory indices. RESULTS: After 3 months of treatment, the HFHD+HDF group achieved a higher satisfaction level than the LFHD+HDF group, with decreased serum ß2M concentrations (34.493 ± 7.257 vs. 43.593 ± 9.036 mg/L, p < 0.001) and elevated red blood cell counts (3.959 ± 0.742 vs. 3.602 ± 0.578 × 1012 /L, p = 0.015). Compared with baseline, both kinds of treatment led to increases in serum urea (t = -3.623, p = 0.001 vs. t = -4.240, p < 0.001), cholesterol (t = -2.511, p = 0.016 vs. t = -4.472, p < 0.001), and magnesium (t = -2.648, p = 0.011 vs. t = -3.561, p = 0.001). An elevated level of serum albumin (t = -2.683, p = 0.010) was observed only in the HFHD+HDF group. CONCLUSIONS: Combined therapy with HFHD and HDF has a beneficial effect on improving ß2M clearance, red blood cell management, and nutrition status in HD patients.

α1- and ß2-Microglobulin reduction ratios and survival in patients on predilution online haemodiafiltration.

AIM: ß2-Microglobulin (ß2-MG) and α1-microglobulin (α1-MG) have molecular weights of 11,800 and 33,000 Da, respectively. We studied the α1-MG and ß2-MG reduction ratios (RRs) and survival in patients on predilution online haemodiafiltration (Pre-OL-HDF). METHODS: Participants were 247 Pre-OL-HDF patients. α1-MG and ß2-MG RRs were assessed at baseline. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used. RESULTS: In 247 patients, the median age was 67 (56-73) years, the dialysis duration was 77 (46-150) months, and the diabetes prevalence was 47.4%. Twenty-two patients died over the 450-day study period. The mortality cut-off values using receiver-operating characteristic curves for the α1-MG and ß2-MG RRs were 20% and 80%, respectively. Survival rates were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in patients with α1-MG RRs ≥20% (n = 134) compared with patients with α1-MG RRs <20% (n = 113) and in patients with ß2-MG RRs ≥80% (n = 87) compared with patients with ß2-MG RRs <80% (n = 160). Cox models adjusting for diabetes and dialysis duration showed that α1-MG RR, ß2-MG RR, and pre- and postdialysis ß2-MG were risk factors for all-cause mortality; however, after additional adjustment for age, sex, and serum albumin, only ß2-MG RR and pre- and postdialysis ß2-MG were significant predictors of mortality (p < 0.05). α1-MG RRs were significantly correlated with ß2-MG RRs (ρ = 0.73, p < 0.0001) and serum albumin levels (ρ = 0.13, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients on Pre-OL-HDF, α1-MG RRs ≥20% and ß2-MG RRs ≥80% were associated with better survival, ß2-MG RR ≥80% and pre-and postdialysis ß2-MG levels were significant predictors of all-cause mortality, and α1-MG RR ≥20% may predict mortality.

Nutritional and Anthropometric Indices in Children Receiving Haemodiafiltration vs Conventional Haemodialysis - The HDF, Heart and Height (3H) Study.

BACKGROUND: The "HDF-Heart-Height" study showed that haemodiafiltration (HDF) is associated with improved growth compared to conventional haemodialysis (HD). We report a post-hoc analysis of this study assessing the effect of extracorporeal dialysis therapies on nutritional indices. METHODS: 107 children were included in the baseline cross-sectional analysis, of whom 79 (43 HD, 36 HDF) completed the 12-month follow-up. Height (Ht), optimal 'dry' weight (Wt), and body mass index (BMI) standard deviations scores (SDS), waist-to-hip ratio, des-acyl ghrelin (DAG), adiponectin, leptin, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1)-SDS and insulin were measured. RESULTS: The levels of nutritional indices were comparable between HDF and HD patients at baseline and 12-month. On univariable analyses Wt-SDS positively correlated with leptin and IGF-1-SDS, and negatively with DAG, while Ht-SDS of the overall cohort positively correlated with IGF1-SDS and inversely with DAG and adiponectin. On multivariable analyses, higher 12-month Ht-SDS was inversely associated with baseline DAG (beta = -0.13 per 500 higher; 95%CI -0.22, -0.04; P = .004). Higher Wt-SDS at 12-month was positively associated with HDF modality (beta = 0.47 vs HD; 95%CI 0.12-0.83; P = .01) and inversely with baseline DAG (beta = -0.18 per 500 higher; 95%CI -0.32, -0.05; P = .006). Growth Hormone (GH) treated patients receiving HDF had higher annualized increase in Ht SDS compared to those on HD. CONCLUSIONS: In children on HD and HDF both Wt- and Ht-SDS independently correlated with lower baseline levels of the anorexygenic hormone DAG. HDF may attenuate the resistance to GH, but further studies are required to examine the mechanisms linking HDF to improved growth.