[Women-specific aspects of venous thromboembolism]. / Frauenspezifische Aspekte bei venöser Thromboembolie.

Women have a higher lifetime risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than men. Hormone-associated risk factors such as pregnancy, contraception and hormone replacement therapy contribute significantly to this. Contraception with combined hormonal contraception increases the risk of VTE in young women, with the extent of the increase in risk being determined by the level of the estrogen dose and the progestin component. After hormone associated VTE, temporary anticoagulation is sufficient in many cases, provided there are no additional persistent risk factors. Affected women should be informed that the risk of VTE recurrence is increased in a subsequent pregnancy and usually requires VTE prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin during pregnancy. If the suspicion of recurrent VTE arises during pregnancy, diagnostics must be carried out promptly so that deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism can be reliably confirmed or ruled out.

Effectiveness and safety of low molecular weight heparin in the management of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) may play a role in mitigating the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesise existing evidence on the effectiveness and safety of LMWH in the treatment of moderately-severe and severe AP. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the 2020 update of the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and EMBASE, covering studies published up to February 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (n-RCTs) that reported the differences in the outcomes of AP for patients receiving LMWH in addition to the standard treatment (Intervention), compared to patients managed by standard treatment without LMWH (Control) were eligible. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled relative risk (RR) and mean differences (MD) with the corresponding 95% CI. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, all published between 2004 and 2022. Eight studies were RCTs, and five were n-RCTs. Data from 13,709 patients (6.971 Interventions and 6.738 Controls) were analysed. The comparison of Intervention and Control groups showed the superiority of LMWH to standard treatments in terms of overall mortality (RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.31; 0.64, P < 0.0001, I2 = 51%), acute necrotic collections (RR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.09; 0.62, P = 0.003, I2 = 0%), and organ failure (RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.48; 0.93, P = 0.02, I2 = 78%). The Intervention group showed superior outcomes compared with the Control group for gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.44; 0.94, P = 0.02, I2 = 0%), length of hospital stay (MD= - 6.08, 95% CI = - 10.08; - 2.07, P = 0.003, I2 = 98%), need for operative interventions (RR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.29; 0.87, P = 0.01, I2 = 61%), and vascular thrombosis (RR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.31; 0.61, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to high-quality evidence suggests that early intervention with LMWH could improve the prognosis of non-mild AP in terms of mortality, organ failure, and decreased incidence of vascular thrombosis. In light of our findings, integrating LMWH into the treatment regimen for moderate-severe to severe AP is advocated.

Anticoagulation strategies in patients with coexisting traumatic intracranial hematomas and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: an observational cohort study.

PURPOSE: Post-traumatic cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (ptCVT) is a rare but serious complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Managing ptCVT is challenging due to the concurrent risk of traumatic intracranial hematoma (ICH) expansion. Limited data exists on the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation therapy (ACT) in these cases. METHODS: This single-center observational cohort study included adult TBI patients with concurrent ICH and ptCVT. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or heparin infusion was used to treat all ptCVTs based on institutional protocols. The outcomes of interest were hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. RESULTS: Out of 1,039 TBI-patients admitted between 2006 and 2020, 32 met the inclusion criteria. The median time from injury to ptCVT diagnosis was 24 h. ACT was initiated at a median of 9 h after ptCVT diagnosis. Patients were administered either heparin infusion (n = 8) or LMWH at dosages ranging from 28 to 72% of the therapeutic level (n = 24). There were no hemorrhagic complications, even in patients receiving LMWH at ≥ 50% of the therapeutic dose. Thrombotic complications occurred in 3 patients (9.4%) - two cases of thrombus progression and one venous infarct. The patients who developed thrombotic complications differed from those who did not by having a 17-h delay in ACT initiation after diagnosis or by receiving an initial LMWH dose at 28% of the therapeutic level. CONCLUSION: LMWH at approximately 50% of the therapeutic level was effective for managing ptCVT associated with TBI in our retrospective dataset, with no risk of hematoma expansion. Prospective trials are warranted to confirm these results.

Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban or low-molecular-weight heparin in non-major orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing non-major orthopedic surgery often face an increased risk of venous thromboembolism due to the necessity of immobilization postoperatively. Current guidelines commonly recommend the use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for prophylaxis, but it is associated with low patient compliance and certain side effects. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban or LMWH for thromboprophylaxis following non-major orthopedic surgery. METHOD: Relevant literature was systematically searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase from their inception to October 1, 2023, to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban or LMWH in RCTs for thromboprophylaxis following non-major orthopedic surgery. RESULTS: A total of 5 randomized controlled trials involving 5,101 patients were included. There was no statistically significant difference in the preventive effect against venous thromboembolism (VTE) when using rivaroxaban or LMWH following non-major orthopedic surgery (RR 0.80; 95%CI 0.31 to 2.07). In terms of safety, there was also no statistically significant difference in the incidence of bleeding events in patients undergoing non-major orthopedic surgery when using rivaroxaban or LMWH (RR 1.15; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.76). CONCLUSION: In non-major orthopedic surgery, the risk of venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications is similar when using rivaroxaban or LMWH.

Clinical efficacy and adverse effects of LMWH combined with ASA in the treatment of RSA: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) in the clinic shows an increasing trend year by year, and the coagulation status of this group of patients is mostly relatively abnormal. Currently, commonly used drugs in clinical practice include Aspirin (ASA) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), but their optimal treatment remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of LMWH combined with ASA in the treatment of RSA. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials of LMWH combined with ASA for RSA were searched in the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System from the construction of the database to June 2024. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata software. Dichotomous variables were analyzed using relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) as their statistics. The included literature was assessed for bias and risk of bias of eligible studies using Cochrane risk of bias tool. The risk of bias was evaluated based on the evaluation criteria recommended by the Cochrane Guidance Manual for Systematic Evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 32 papers with a total of 3397 patients with RSA were finally included. LMWH combined with ASA treatment significantly improved the live birth rate (RR = 1.31, 95% CI: [1.19, 1.45], P < .00001), the rate of preterm stillbirths (RR = 0.23, 95% CI: [0.13, 0.40], P < .00001), rate of term delivery (RR = 1.55, 95% CI: [1.43, 1.67], P < .00001), rate of miscarriage (RR = 0.42, 95% CI: [0.36, 0.48], P < .00001), incidence of petechiae (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: [0.26, 0.72], P = .001), and incidence of thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.61, 95% CI: [0.39, 0.96], P = .03). In contrast, the incidence of preterm live births (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: [0.90, 1.28], P = .44), adverse reactions (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: [0.59, 1.00], P = .05), gingival bleeding (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: [0.65, 1.93], P = .69), and gastrointestinal reactions (RR = 0.87, 95% CI: [0.64, 1.17], P = .35) were not significant. CONCLUSION: LMWH combined with ASA treatment might improve pregnancy outcomes and reduces the incidence of adverse events in patients with RSA.

Effectiveness and Safety of Extended Treatment Apixaban Versus Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Limited real-world evidence is available comparing the safety and effectiveness of apixaban and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) for preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with active cancer receiving anticoagulation in an extended treatment setting. This study evaluated the risk of bleeding and recurrent VTE in patients with cancer-associated VTE who were prescribed apixaban or LMWH for ≥3 months. METHODS: A US commercial claims database was used to identify adult patients with VTE and active cancer who initiated apixaban or LMWH 30 days following the first VTE diagnosis and had ≥3 months of continuous enrollment and 3 months of primary anticoagulation treatment. Patients were followed from the day after the end of primary anticoagulation treatment until the earliest of: date of disenrollment, discontinuation of index anticoagulant, switch to another anticoagulant, or end of the study period. Inverse-probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance treatment cohorts. Incidence rates (IRs) for the outcomes were calculated per 100 person-years (PY). Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the adjusted risk of recurrent VTE, major bleeding (MB), and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB). RESULTS: A total of 13,564 apixaban- and 2,808 LMWH-treated patients were analyzed. Post-IPTW, the treatment cohorts were balanced. Patients receiving apixaban had lower adjusted IRs for recurrent VTE (4.1 vs 9.6 per 100 PY), MB (6.3 vs 12.6), and CRNMB (26.1 vs 36.0) versus LMWH (P<.0001 for all comparisons) during the follow-up period. Patients on apixaban had a lower adjusted risk of recurrent VTE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.34-0.53), MB (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.41-0.61), and CRNMB (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.85) versus LMWH. CONCLUSIONS: Extended anticoagulation treatment of ≥3 months with apixaban was associated with lower rates of recurrent VTE, MB, and CRNMB compared with LMWH in adults with cancer-associated VTE.

Treating cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: A practical approach.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and potentially life-threatening complication in patients with cancer. Both cancer and its treatments increase the risk of developing VTE. Specific cancer types and individual patient comorbidities increase the risk of developing cancer-associated VTE, and the risk of bleeding is increased with anticoagulation therapies. The aims of this article are to summarize the latest evidence for treating cancer-associated VTE, discuss the practical considerations involved, and share best practices for VTE treatment in patients with cancer. The article pays particular attention to challenging contexts including patients with brain, lung, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary tumors and those with hematological malignancies. Furthermore, the article summarizes specific clinical scenarios that require additional treatment considerations, including extremes of body weight, nausea and gastrointestinal disturbances, compromised renal function, and anemia, and touches upon the relevance of drug-drug interactions. Historically, vitamin K antagonists and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been used as therapy for cancer-associated VTE. The development of direct oral anticoagulants has provided additional treatment options, which, in certain instances, offer advantages over LMWHs. There are numerous factors that need to be considered when treating cancer-associated VTE, and although various treatment guidelines are helpful, they do not reflect each unique scenario that may arise in clinical practice. This article provides a summary of the latest evidence and a practical approach for treating cancer-associated VTE.

A pilot study of safety and efficacy comparison of low molecular heparin calcium sequential oral anticoagulants in the treatment of cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to compare and assess the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin calcium (LMWH-Ca), followed by either warfarin or rivaroxaban, as treatment options for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: In this pilot study, cirrhotic (with liver function score of Child-Pugh A) patients diagnosed with PVT who were not on anticoagulant therapy received 2 weeks of subcutaneous injections of LMWH-Ca. They were then randomized to either warfarin (a full course of oral warfarin for 6 months) or rivaroxaban (a full course of oral rivaroxaban for 2 months), with 30 cases in each group. After a treatment period of up to 6 months, a comparative analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of both groups. Volumetric changes in PVT were monitored dynamically using enhanced computed tomography scans before treatment at week 2 and month 6. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical characteristics of the patients between the two groups. Rivaroxaban treatment reduced PVT median volume from 1.83 cm3 at week 2 to 0.0 cm3 at month 6 and prevented the worsening of PVT after 6 months of treatment with LMWH-Ca (P < 0.001). On the other hand, warfarin treatment increased PVT median volume from 1.95 cm3 at week 2 to 3.78 cm3 at month 6 (P = 0.002). None of the 30 patients in the rivaroxaban group had clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding, while 2 of the 30 patients (7%) in the warfarin group had gastrointestinal bleeding (P = 0.317). CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban followed by LMWH-Ca is an effective anticoagulant treatment strategy for PVT in cirrhosis.

Preferences of pregnant women for postpartum thromboprophylaxis: the bicentric PREFER-PostPartum study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines for postpartum thromboprophylaxis differ due to its uncertain effect and varying preferences of experts. Women's preferences for postpartum thromboprophylaxis are unknown, although they may inform practices and future research. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to elicit the pregnant women's preferences for postpartum thromboprophylaxis according to different risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding. METHODS: In 2 Swiss and French maternity hospitals, we conducted structured interviews of pregnant or postpartum women. Participants were instructed on pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, postpartum hemorrhage, and subcutaneous injections of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). First, we randomized women to either standard gamble or time trade-off (2 different validated methods) to estimate the utilities (quality of life, from 0 to 1) of these health states. Second, we elicited the preference for the use of short-term postpartum thromboprophylaxis with LMWH vs none across different risks of postpartum VTE and bleeding through direct-choice exercises. RESULTS: Among 122 participants, median (IQR) health state utilities were 0.725 (0.30-0.925) for pulmonary embolism, 0.75 (0.40-0.97) for postpartum hemorrhage, 0.85 (0.60-0.97) for deep vein thrombosis, and 0.96 (0.96-0.999) for LMWH injections. The median risk of postpartum VTE for preference of the use of postpartum thromboprophylaxis over no treatment was 0.1% (IQR, 0.01%-0.50%) without LMWH-associated bleeding risk and 0.2% (IQR, 0.1%-5%) with a 1% bleeding risk. CONCLUSION: European pregnant women appear to have a high willingness for 10-day postpartum thromboprophylaxis, preferred over no treatment even for low risks of postpartum VTE. This perspective from patients supports the urgent need for a randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of postpartum thromboprophylaxis.

Effectiveness and safety of continuous low-molecular-weight heparin versus switching to direct oral anticoagulants in cancer-associated venous thrombosis.

Given the existing uncertainty regarding the effectiveness and safety of switching from low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cancer-associated venous thrombosis (CAT), we conducted a comprehensive population-based cohort study utilizing electronic health database in Hong Kong. A total of 4356 patients with CAT between 2010 and 2022 were included, with 1700 (39.0%) patients switching to DOAC treatment. Compared to continuous LMWH treatment, switching to DOACs was associated with a significantly lower risk of hospitalization due to venous thromboembolism (HR: 0.49 [95% CI = 0.35-0.68]) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.67 [95% CI = 0.61-0.74]), with no significant difference in major bleeding (HR: 1.04 [95% CI = 0.83-1.31]) within six months. These findings provide reassurance regarding the effectiveness and safety of switching from LMWH to DOACs among patients with CAT, including vulnerable patient groups.

Risk factors for MACE and bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing surgery: Insights from the bridge trial.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing elective procedures are at risk for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) and symptomatic bleeding. We aimed to identify risk factors to guide perioperative risk stratification. METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the "Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients who Require Temporary Interruption of Warfarin Therapy for an Elective Invasive Procedure or Surgery" randomized trial. The primary outcomes were MACE and symptomatic bleeding. Our statistical approach encompassed standard univariate analysis, logistic stepwise regression, and Cox regression models. Additional interaction analyses evaluated the interplay between low-molecular-weight heparin bridge therapy and other identified risk factors. RESULTS: Among a total of 1,813 participants (mean age 71.6 ± 8.8, 73.3 % male), MACE occurred in 25 (1.4 %) individuals, with pre-procedure clopidogrel use (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 7.73, 95 % CI 2.63-22.72, p < 0.001) and CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 5 (aHR 2.89, 95 % CI 1.26-6.63, p = 0.012) identified as risk factors. Symptomatic bleeding occurred in 57 (3.1 %) individuals, with bridge therapy (aHR 1.84, 95 % CI 1.07-3.19, p = 0.029), renal disease (aHR 2.50, 95 % CI 1.34-4.67, p = 0.004), post-procedure aspirin use (aHR 2.86, 95 % CI 1.66-4.91, p < 0.001), post-procedure nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use excluding aspirin (aHR 3.40, 95 % CI 1.22-9.43, p = 0.019), and major surgery (aHR 3.94, 95 % CI 2.26-6.85, p < 0.001) identified as risk factors. The interactions between risk factors and bridging therapy on MACE and symptomatic bleeding outcomes were not significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We identified predictors for MACE and symptomatic bleeding in AF patients undergoing elective procedures. These insights may help guide perioperative decisions to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes.

Comparison of rivaroxaban and low molecular weight heparin in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a Swedish national population-based register study.

BACKGROUND: Treating cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) with anticoagulation prevents recurrent venous thromboembolism (rVTE), but increases bleeding risk. OBJECTIVES: To compare incidence of rVTE, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality for rivaroxaban versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with CAT. METHODS: We developed a cohort study using Swedish national registers 2013-2019. Patients with CAT (venous thromboembolism within 6 months of cancer diagnosis) were included. Those with other indications or with high bleeding risk cancers were excluded (according to guidelines). Follow-up was from index-CAT until outcome, death, emigration, or end of study. Incidence rates (IR) per 1000 person-years with 95% confidence interval (CI) and propensity score overlap-weighted hazard ratios (HRs) for rivaroxaban versus LMWH were estimated. RESULTS: We included 283 patients on rivaroxaban and 5181 on LMWH. The IR for rVTE was 68.7 (95% CI 40.0-109.9) for rivaroxaban, compared with 91.6 (95% CI 81.9-102.0) for LMWH, with adjusted HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.43-1.35). The IR for major bleeding was 23.5 (95% CI 8.6-51.1) for rivaroxaban versus 49.2 (95% CI 42.3-56.9) for LMWH, with adjusted HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.26-1.49). The IR for all-cause mortality was 146.8 (95% CI 103.9-201.5) for rivaroxaban and 565.6 (95% CI 541.8-590.2) for LMWH with adjusted HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.34-0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban performed similarly to LMWH for patients with CAT for rVTE and major bleeding. An all-cause mortality benefit was observed for rivaroxaban which potentially may be attributed to residual confounding. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05150938 (Registered 9 December 2021).

Effectiveness and Safety of Early Versus Routine Switching from Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin to Maintenance Therapy of Rivaroxaban for Acute Iliofemoral Vein Thrombosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The anticoagulation strategy of switching to rivaroxaban after 1 week of initial low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy is recommended by a guideline for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, the initial rivaroxaban dose in the switching strategy, as well as the effectiveness and safety of the early switching (less than 1 week) to rivaroxaban, remain inadequately substantiated. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of early switching from LMWH to maintenance therapy of rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily) for acute iliofemoral DVT. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from patients with acute iliofemoral DVT who received initial LMWH anticoagulation followed by rivaroxaban maintenance therapy. The clinical outcomes were compared between early (LMWH course ≤7 days) and routine (LMWH course >7 days) switching strategies within 3 months of initiating anticoagulation. RESULTS: 217 patients were included, 59 (27.2%) receiving early switching and 158 (72.8%) receiving routine switching. Compared with routine switching, patients with early switching had a significantly shorter hospital stay (7 days vs. 14 days, P < 0.001). The length of hospital stay was significantly positively correlated with the duration of LMWH (r = 0.762, P < 0.001). The incidences of recurrent venous thromboembolism (5.1% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.606), major bleeding (0% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.564), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (1.7% vs. 2.5%, P = 1.000) and all-cause mortality (6.8% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.283) were not statistically different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Direct early switching from LMWH to maintenance therapy of rivaroxaban is effective and safe for acute iliofemoral DVT.

Glass bead-activated clotting time (gb-ACT) for monitoring the anticoagulation effects in elderly patients with high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

BACKGROUND: To find a new bedside method to monitor the anticoagulation effects of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in patients with a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 32 hospitalized patients (aged ≥60 years) who were at high risk of VTE were assigned to receive subcutaneous LMWH for 5 to 14 days. Plasma anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) activity was conducted by a chromogenic method, and the glass bead-activated whole blood clotting time (gb-ACT) value was obtained by a Sonoclot Analyzer. RESULTS: A correlation between the gb-ACT values and the anti-Xa levels was suggested (R = 0.447, p = 0.002), and it was stronger in the older group aged 80 years above (R = 0.467, p = 0.008) and in the group of patients with an eGFR of 30 ~ 60 mL/min (R = 0.565, p = 0.005). The area under the curve (AUC) for gb-ACT by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve evaluation was 0.725 (p = 0.011), and the gb-ACT >282.5s provided a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 74% for anti-Xa >0.800 IU/ml. CONCLUSIONS: The gb-ACT values detected by a Sonoclot Analyzer could act as a novel bedside method in the monitoring of LMWH anticoagulation.

Efficacy and safety of bemiparin as treatment of venous thromboembolic disease in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: As the elderly population continues to grow worldwide, it becomes crucial to explore safe and effective treatment options to manage venous thromboembolic disease in this vulnerable demographic group. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective cohort study (January 2017-December 2021) to analyse the efficacy and safety of bemiparin as a treatment for venous thromboembolic disease in 223 patients. We compared patients aged ≥65 years (elderly; n = 153) with patients aged less than 65 years (adults; n = 70) for a combined end point of death, recurrent thromboembolism, and major bleeding at 30 days. RESULTS: Elderly (mean age 79 ± 7.7 years) and adult patients (mean age 51.5 ± 11.6 years) received similar bemiparin doses 8470 ± 2362 International units (IU)/d versus 8754 ± 1593 IU/d, during a similar median [Interquartile range] period of 28 [9-118] versus 30 [10-90] days, respectively. At 30-day follow up a total of 24 elderly patients (15.7%), reached at least one of the end points, as compared with six adult patients (8.6%) (absolute difference 7.1%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], -1.6 to 15.8). Recurrence of venous thromboembolic disease occurred in five elderly patients (3.3%) and in five adult patients (7.1%) (absolute difference -3.9%; 95% CI, -10.5 to 2.8). There were two episodes of major bleeding each in elderly (1.3%) and adult (2.9%) patients (absolute difference -1.6%; 95% CI, -5.8 to 2.7). CONCLUSION: Bemiparin showed a similar efficacy and safety profile in the treatment of venous thromboembolic disease in elderly and adult patients.

Structured benefit-risk assessment for enoxaparin, in the context of its label extension, for the extended treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and prevention of its recurrence in patients with active cancer.

PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) for patients with cancer-associated thrombosis. However, until recently, only dalteparin and tinzaparin were approved in the European Economic Area (EEA) for these patients. This study compares the benefit-risk profile of enoxaparin with dalteparin and tinzaparin for the extended treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and prevention of recurrence in adult patients with active cancer. METHODS: A semi-quantitative structured benefit-risk assessment was conducted for the label-extension application of enoxaparin based on the benefit-risk action team descriptive framework: define decision context; determine key benefit and risk outcomes; identify data sources; extract data; interpret results. RESULTS: The key benefits were defined as reduced all-cause mortality and venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence (including symptomatic DVT, fatal PE or non-fatal PE); the key risks were major and non-major bleeding of clinical significance, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Enoxaparin demonstrated comparable effects for the reduction of VTE recurrence and all-cause mortality versus other EEA-approved LMWHs (dalteparin, tinzaparin). There was no evidence of a significant difference between enoxaparin and the comparator groups with regard to incidence of major and non-major bleeding. The data on HIT were too limited to assess the difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment demonstrated a favourable benefit-risk profile for enoxaparin similar to that of other EEA-approved LMWHs for the treatment of DVT and PE and the prevention of recurrence in patients with active cancer and thus supported the label-extension approval.

Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban for anticoagulation therapy in COVID-19: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban anticoagulation in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library electronic databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to identify all relevant randomized controlled trial studies from December 2019 to July 2023. RESULTS: A total of 6 randomized controlled trials, which included a total of 3323 patients, were considered for evaluation. Overall, short-term all-cause mortality and hospitalization rates were not significantly different between the rivaroxaban and control groups. Thrombotic events were significantly reduced in the rivaroxaban prophylaxis group compared to the placebo control group. However, the reduction in thrombotic events was not significantly different between rivaroxaban therapy and heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Rivaroxaban prophylaxis and the therapeutic dose may be associated with a higher rate of overall bleeding rate, but major bleeding rates did not differ substantially. CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban may reduce thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients, but it does not appear to have an advantage over heparin or LMWH, and it may increase the risk of bleeding.INPLASY Reg. No.: INPLASY 202370097.

Impact of perioperative low-molecular-weight heparin therapy on clinical events of elderly patients with prior coronary stents implanted > 12 months undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the safety and efficacy of discontinuing antiplatelet therapy via LMWH bridging therapy in elderly patients with coronary stents implanted for > 12 months undergoing non-cardiac surgery. This randomized trial was designed to compare the clinical benefits and risks of antiplatelet drug discontinuation via LMWH bridging therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous injections of either dalteparin sodium or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was cardiac or cerebrovascular events. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding. RESULTS: Among 2476 randomized patients, the variables (sex, age, body mass index, comorbidities, medications, and procedural characteristics) and percutaneous coronary intervention information were not significantly different between the bridging and non-bridging groups. During the follow-up period, the rate of the combined endpoint in the bridging group was significantly lower than in the non-bridging group (5.79% vs. 8.42%, p = 0.012). The incidence of myocardial injury in the bridging group was significantly lower than in the non-bridging group (3.14% vs. 5.19%, p = 0.011). Deep vein thrombosis occurred more frequently in the non-bridging group (1.21% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.024), and there was a trend toward a higher rate of pulmonary embolism (0.32% vs. 0.08%, p = 0.177). There was no significant difference between the groups in the rates of acute myocardial infarction (0.81% vs. 1.38%), cardiac death (0.24% vs. 0.41%), stroke (0.16% vs. 0.24%), or major bleeding (1.22% vs. 1.45%). Multivariable analysis showed that LMWH bridging, creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min, preoperative hemoglobin < 10 g/dL, and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of ischemic events. LMWH bridging and a preoperative platelet count of < 70 × 109/L were independent predictors of minor bleeding events. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the safety and efficacy of perioperative LMWH bridging therapy in elderly patients with coronary stents implanted > 12 months undergoing non-cardiac surgery. An alternative approach might be the use of bridging therapy with half-dose LMWH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN65203415.

Acute pulmonary embolism in cancer patients admitted to intensive care unit: Impact of anticoagulant treatment on 90-day mortality and risk factors, results of a multicentre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening situation in cancer patients. In this situation, anticoagulant therapy is complex to administer due to the risk of bleeding. Only few studies have been conducted when these patients are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to assess the association between anticoagulation strategies as well as other factors with 90-day mortality in patients with cancer and PE admitted to ICU. Major bleeding was also evaluated according to the type of anticoagulation. METHODS: Retrospective study carried out in 4 ICUs in France over a 12-year period (2009-2021). All patients with cancer and PE were included. An overlap propensity score weighting analysis was performed in the subgroup of patients treated with either unfractionated heparins (UFH) alone or low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) alone on 90-day mortality and major bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 218 consecutive cancer patients admitted to ICU and presenting PE were included. The 90-day mortality rate was 42 % for the global cohort. After propensity score analysis in the subgroup of patients treated with either "UFH alone" (n = 80) or "LMWH alone" (n = 71), the 90-day mortality was similar in patients treated with UFH alone (42.6 %) vs LMWH alone (39.9 %): OR = 1.124, CI 95 % [0.571-2.214], p = 0.750. There was a significant increased toward major bleeding rates in the "UFH alone" group (25.5 %) as compared to "LMWH alone" group (11.5 %), p = 0.04. CONCLUSION: In 218 patients admitted to ICU and presenting PE, the 90-day mortality rate was 42 %. Treatment with UFH alone was associated with a mortality comparable to treatment with LMWH alone but it appeared to be more prone to major bleeding.

Combination anticoagulation strategy in pregnancy with mechanical valves: The KYBELE study.

BACKGROUND: Optimal first-trimester anticoagulation is still challenging in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves (MHVs) requiring high-dose warfarin. This multicenter prospective study aims to determine the optimal anticoagulation regimens for pregnant patients with MHVs. METHODS: All women were allocated to one of three treatment options during first trimester including lone low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), combination of LMWH + 2.5 mg warfarin, and LMWH+4 mg warfarin. Primary maternal outcome included a combination of death, thromboembolism, severe bleeding, and need for treatment of mechanical valve thrombosis (MVT). Any fetal loss was determined as primary fetal outcome. RESULTS: The study included 78 pregnancies in 65 women with MHVs. Primary maternal outcome rate was 44%, 12.5%, 3.5%, respectively. The rates of primary maternal outcome (44 vs 3.5%, P < .001), obstructive MVT (16 vs 0%, P = .04), MVT requiring treatment (28 vs 0%, P = .003), and cerebral embolism (24 vs 3.4%, P = .041) were found to be significantly higher in lone LMWH group compared to LMWH + 4 mg warfarin group. Moreover, the rates of primary maternal outcome (12.5 vs 44%, P = .015) and treatment for MHV thrombus (4.2 vs 28%, P = .049) were significantly lower in LMWH + 2.5 mg warfarin group compared to lone LMWH group. The incidences of fetal loss were 8 (32%) in the lone LMWH group, 8 (33.3%) in LMWH + 2.5 mg warfarin group, and 11 (37.9%) in LMWH + 4 mg warfarin group (P = .890 for 3-group).Warfarin related-embryopathy was not observed in any case. CONCLUSIONS: The combined anticoagulation strategy of LMWH plus low-dose warfarin during the first trimester of pregnancy may result in less maternal complications with comparable fetal outcomes in patients with MHVs. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is thought to be safer for the fetus, however it is suspected to be less protective for the mother. To solve this dilemma, the authors suggested a novel anticoagulation strategy in pregnant women with prosthetic valves. Seventy-eight pregnancies of 65 women (median age 32 [27-35] years) were included in the study. A combination of LMWH and a reduced dose warfarin were associated with low rates of thrombus-related complications in pregnant patients with mechanical heart valves.