Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.112
Filtrar
1.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 235, 2024 Jul 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38997652

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Delayed spinal epidural hematoma (SEH) following central neuraxial block (CNB) is a rare but serious complication. The underlying causes of SEH associated with neuraxial anesthesia are still unclear. Furthermore, the decision between surgical intervention and conservative management for SEH remains a complex and unresolved issue. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of delayed SEH in a 73-year-old woman who underwent vaginal hysterectomy under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, with the administration of postoperative anticoagulants to prevent deep vein thrombosis on the 1st postoperative day (POD). She experienced symptoms 56 h after CNB. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a dorsal SEH at the L1-L4 level with compression of the thecal sac. On conservative treatment, full recovery was achieved after six months. CONCLUSIONS: This case reminds anesthesiologists should be alert to the possible occurrence of a delayed SEH following CNB, particularly with the administration of anticoagulants. Immediate neurological evaluation of neurological deficit and MRI are advised. Conservative treatment combined with close and dynamic neurological function monitoring may be feasible for patients with mild or nonprogressive symptoms even spontaneous recovery.


Assuntos
Anestesia Epidural , Raquianestesia , Tratamento Conservador , Hematoma Epidural Espinal , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Hematoma Epidural Espinal/etiologia , Hematoma Epidural Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Anestesia Epidural/efeitos adversos , Raquianestesia/efeitos adversos , Tratamento Conservador/métodos , Histerectomia Vaginal , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Asian J Endosc Surg ; 17(3): e13333, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38839273

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) versus nonendoscopic USLS in patients with subtotal uterine prolapse who had a concomitant vaginal hysterectomy. METHODS: There were 51 patients who underwent vNOTES USLS, whereas the nonendoscopic conventional USLS group had 49 patients. The information about patient demographics, and perioperative data including the operative duration, blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and length of postoperative hospital stay were determined from the patients' files. Postoperative follow-up visits were scheduled at the first week and 1 month after surgery. RESULTS: The demographic variables including age, body mass index, menopausal status, and parity were comparable, and no significant differences were found. A total of 90.2% of the patients in the vNOTES group and 69.4% of the patients in the shull group were at menopause (p = .09). Operation time was significantly shorter in the shull group (p < .001), and the hospitalization period (p = .029) was significantly shorter in the vNOTES group. Ba, Bp, and D points and total vaginal length (TVL) were significantly behind the hymenal ring in patients who had vNOTES USLS procedure (p < .001). None of the patients who had intraoperative significant blood loss required transfusion. One patient in the vNOTES and two patients in the shull group had a postoperative cuff hematoma. CONCLUSION: vNOTES USLS has a good safety profile, higher percentage of adnexal surgeries with better improvement on POP-Q points Ba, Bp, D, and TVL compared with classic USLS in patients with subtotal uterine prolapse. Studies evaluating short- and long-term results of vNOTES versus conventional USLS are needed.


Assuntos
Histerectomia Vaginal , Ligamentos , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural , Prolapso Uterino , Humanos , Feminino , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/métodos , Prolapso Uterino/cirurgia , Ligamentos/cirurgia , Idoso , Resultado do Tratamento , Vagina/cirurgia , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia
3.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 299: 131-135, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865739

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) is usually performed under general (GA) or regional anaesthesia. In recent years, the possibility of performing vaginal hysterectomy under local anaesthesia (LA) has also been explored. Our aim was to compare intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes in women who underwent VH under LA with intravenous sedation or GA. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we collected data of patients who underwent VH at our department from June 2021 to December 2022. For every patient, the following data was obtained: hospitalisation duration, type of anaesthesia (LA or GA), accompanying procedures, the dosage of used local anaesthetic in the LA group, maximal pain score for each day of hospitalisation after the procedure, procedure duration, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complication rate. Data was analysed using the SPSS Statistics programme. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included in the study. The mean age was significantly higher in the LA group compared to GA group (73.8 ± 8.0 years vs. 67.1 ± 9.3 respectively, p-value = 0.003). LA was associated with statistically lower pain scores in the first two days after the procedure (p = 0.003), and shorter procedure duration (p-value <0.001) as well as hospitalisation duration (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the cumulative dosage of different analgesics used during hospitalisation was higher in the GA group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that LA is a feasible option for patients undergoing VH. Vaginal surgical procedures under LA could be especially beneficial for older patients with medical comorbidities in whom GA would be particularly hazardous.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local , Histerectomia Vaginal , Humanos , Feminino , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Anestesia Local/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Anestesia Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle
4.
Obstet Gynecol ; 144(2): 266-274, 2024 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38870524

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare inpatient hospital costs and complication rates within the 90-day global billing period among routes of hysterectomy. METHODS: The Premier Healthcare Database was used to identify patients who underwent hysterectomy between 2000 and 2020. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to group patients based on route of hysterectomy. Comorbidities and complications were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes. Fixed, variable, and total costs for inpatient care were compared. Fixed costs consist of costs that are set for the case, such as operating room time or surgeon costs. Variable costs include disposable and reusable items that are billed additionally. Total costs equal fixed and variable costs combined. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, t test, and χ 2 test, as appropriate. Factors independently associated with increased total costs were assessed using linear mixed effects models. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate associations between the route of surgery and complication rates. RESULTS: A cohort of 400,977 patients were identified and grouped by route of hysterectomy. Vaginal hysterectomy demonstrated the lowest inpatient total cost ($6,524.00 [interquartile range $4,831.60, $8,785.70]), and robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy had the highest total cost ($9,386.80 [interquartile range $6,912.40, $12,506.90]). These differences persisted with fixed and variable costs. High-volume laparoscopic and robotic surgeons (more than 50 cases per year) had a decrease in the cost difference when compared with costs of vaginal hysterectomy. Abdominal hysterectomy had a higher rate of complications relative to vaginal hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.52, 95% CI, 1.39-1.67), whereas laparoscopic (aOR 0.85, 95% CI, 0.80-0.89) and robotic-assisted (aOR 0.92, 95% CI, 0.84-1.00) hysterectomy had lower rates of complications compared with vaginal hysterectomy. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted hysterectomy is associated with higher surgical costs compared with other approaches, even when accounting for surgeon volume. Complication rates are low for minimally invasive surgery, and it is unlikely that the robotic-assisted approach provides an appreciable improvement in perioperative outcomes.


Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares , Histerectomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Doenças Uterinas , Humanos , Feminino , Histerectomia/economia , Histerectomia/métodos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Uterinas/cirurgia , Doenças Uterinas/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Histerectomia Vaginal/economia , Histerectomia Vaginal/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/economia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Bases de Dados Factuais
5.
Obstet Gynecol ; 144(1): 40-52, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743951

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal hysterectomy approach for large uteri in gynecologic surgery for benign indications from a perioperative morbidity standpoint. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Embase databases were searched from inception through September 19, 2022. Meta-analyses were conducted as feasible. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: This review included studies that compared routes of hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for large uteri (12 weeks or more or 250 g or more) and excluded studies with any concurrent surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, incontinence, gynecologic malignancy, or any obstetric indication for hysterectomy. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The review included 25 studies comprising nine randomized trials, two prospective, and 14 retrospective nonrandomized comparative studies. Studies were at high risk of bias. There was lower operative time for total vaginal hysterectomy compared with laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) (mean difference 39 minutes, 95% CI, 18-60) and total vaginal hysterectomy compared with total laparoscopic hysterectomy (mean difference 50 minutes, 95% CI, 29-70). Total laparoscopic hysterectomy was associated with much greater risk of ureteral injury compared with total vaginal hysterectomy (odds ratio 7.54, 95% CI, 2.52-22.58). There were no significant differences in bowel injury rates between groups. There were no differences in length of stay among the laparoscopic approaches. For LAVH compared with total vaginal hysterectomy, randomized controlled trials favored total vaginal hysterectomy for length of stay. When rates of blood transfusion were compared between these abdominal hysterectomy and robotic-assisted total hysterectomy routes, abdominal hysterectomy was associated with a sixfold greater risk of transfusion than robotic-assisted total hysterectomy (6.31, 95% CI, 1.07-37.32). Similarly, single studies comparing robotic-assisted total hysterectomy with LAVH, total laparoscopic hysterectomy, or total vaginal hysterectomy all favored robotic-assisted total hysterectomy for reduced blood loss. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive routes are safe and effective and have few complications. Minimally invasive approach (vaginal, laparoscopic, or robotic) results in lower blood loss and shorter length of stay, whereas the abdominal route has a shorter operative time. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021233300.


Assuntos
Histerectomia Vaginal , Histerectomia , Laparoscopia , Humanos , Feminino , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Histerectomia Vaginal/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/métodos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Útero/cirurgia , Duração da Cirurgia , Doenças Uterinas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Salpingo-Ooforectomia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(4): 785-787, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751279

RESUMO

This retrospective cohort study analysed the trends and complications of vaginal hysterectomy conducted at Services Hospital, Lahore, from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020. Demographics, indications, surgery duration, complications (haemorrhage, urological or rectal problems, infection), and hospital stay were recorded. Out of 819 hysterectomies performed for benign gynaecological conditions, 112 (13.68%) were vaginal hysterectomies. Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH) accounted for 33(29.46%) and uterine prolapse for 79(70.53%) of the cases. Mean age was 52.35±8.74 years, parity was 5.01±1.32, intraoperative haemorrhage was 796.87±450.1 ml, surgery duration was 48.61±12.28 minutes, and hospital stay was 2.58±0.41 days. Complications occurred in 19(16.97%) of the cases, while 93(83.03%) cases had no complications. Outcomes were comparable between NDVH and vaginal hysterectomy for prolapse (p=0.552). This indicates that vaginal hysterectomy is a safe procedure with minimal complications and quick recovery for uterine prolapse and non-descent uterus. However, a declining trend was observed over the study period.


Assuntos
Histerectomia Vaginal , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Prolapso Uterino , Humanos , Feminino , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Histerectomia Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prolapso Uterino/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Duração da Cirurgia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Paquistão , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Ginecologia
7.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 309(6): 2735-2740, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38557832

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Hysterectomy is one of the most common major gynecological surgeries, and it is performed for benign and malignant reasons. Currently, five types of hysterectomies are described: vaginal (VH), abdominal (AH), laparoscopic (LH), robotic, and vNOTES (vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery). This paper compares these two types of surgery in obese patients by analyzing the surgeries performed by our team. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The research was conducted from January 2022 to December 2023 at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the General Hospital in Zadar. The study included female patients aged 18-75 years with a BMI > 30 kg/m2, regardless of parity, who were operated on for benign pathology. RESULTS: There were 24 patients included in total. One conversion was observed in the TLH group because of excessive bleeding. Median operative time (IQR) was significantly lower in the vNOTES group (p < 0.05) than in the TLH group 35 (10.9) vs 125 (74.0) min. CONCLUSION: The results concerning the duration of surgery, conversion rate, and postoperative bleeding and complications show that vNOTES hysterectomies seem to be feasible for obese patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these observations.


Assuntos
Histerectomia , Laparoscopia , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural , Obesidade , Duração da Cirurgia , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Obesidade/cirurgia , Obesidade/complicações , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Histerectomia/métodos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/métodos , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Histerectomia Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos
8.
BMJ Open ; 14(4): e081979, 2024 Apr 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658010

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Hysterectomy is one of the most common surgeries performed in women. Minimally invasive methods are on the rise globally as they have been shown to decrease surgical morbidity compared with abdominal hysterectomy. Hysterectomy by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is the latest innovation. It combines the vaginal approach and endoscopy via the vagina. Large pragmatic randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking comparing outcomes after vNOTES, vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). METHODS: Multicentre pragmatic RCT aiming to recruit 1000 women aged 18-75 years undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease. The RCT includes two identical substudies (groups A and B). If VH is considered safe and feasible, the patient will be randomised within group A (VH vs vNOTES). If VH is not considered safe or feasible, patients will be randomised within group B (LH vs vNOTES). ANALYSIS: Primary outcome is the proportion of women leaving the hospital within 12 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes are hospitalisation time, conversion rates, duration of the surgical procedure, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications and readmission. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Ethical Board Committee at Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium, has approved the research protocol 230704 (principal investigator). Before including patients, all centres will require local or national ethical approval. The results of the study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05971875.


Assuntos
Histerectomia Vaginal , Laparoscopia , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural , Humanos , Feminino , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Idoso , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Histerectomia/métodos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 26(3): 169-173, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38493328

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Obliterative vaginal procedures may offer lower perioperative morbidity and equal success rates as reconstructive procedures for frail and elderly women who no longer desire future coital function. The combination of vaginal hysterectomy with either reconstructive or obliterative vaginal procedures has not yet been investigated. OBJECTIVES: To compare peri- and postoperative outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic floor reconstruction (VHR) vs. vaginal hysterectomy with colpocleisis (VHC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study comparing medical and surgical data of patients undergoing either VHR or VHC between 2006 and 2015. Data were obtained from inpatient and outpatient medical records including peri- and postoperative course, as well as long-term (24 months) follow-up data. RESULTS: We identified 172 patients who underwent VHR and 44 who underwent VHC. Patients in the VHC group were significantly older (71.3 ± 4.5 vs. 68.6 ± 6.5 years, P = 0.01), and more likely to have medical co-morbidities (P = 0.001 and P = 0.029, respectively). Patients in the VHC group experienced shorter operative time (2.3 ± 0.58 vs. 2.7 ± 1.02 hours, P = 0.007), lower perioperative blood loss (P < 0.0001), shorter hospital stay (P < 0.0001), and lower rates of postoperative urinary retention. Long-term pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence rates were significantly higher among the VHR group. Postoperative resolution of both stress urinary incontinence and overactive bladder were common in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: VHC is associated with lower perioperative blood loss, shorter operative time, shorter hospital stay, shorter time with an indwelling catheter, and lower long-term objective POP recurrence rates.


Assuntos
Histerectomia Vaginal , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(4): 881-891, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38488886

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to investigate the correlation between endogenous vaginal microecological alterations and female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: Patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy were retrospectively analyzed as the POP group (n = 30) and the non-POP group (n = 30). The vaginal microbial metabolites and enzyme levels were tested using the dry chemoenzymatic method. The mRNA and protein expression were tested using real-time quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry. SPSS version 25.0 and GraphPad Prism 8.0 were performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Compared with the non-POP group, the vaginal pH, H2O2 positivity and leukocyte esterase positivity were higher in patients with POP (all p < 0.05). Further analysis showed that patients with pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) stage IV had higher rates of vaginal pH, H2O2 positivity and leukocyte esterase positivity than those with POP-Q stage III. Additionally, the mRNA expression of decorin (DCN), transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-ß1), and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) in uterosacral ligament tissues were higher, whereas collagen I and III were lower. Similarly, the positive expression of MMP-3 in uterosacral ligament tissue was significantly upregulated in the POP group compared with the non-POP group (p = 0.035), whereas collagen I (p = 0.004) and collagen III (p = 0.019) in uterosacral ligament tissue were significantly downregulated in the POP group. Correlation analysis revealed that there was a significant correlation between vaginal microecology and collagen metabolism. In addition, MMP-3 correlated negatively with collagen I and collagen III (p = 0.002, r = -0.533; p = 0.002, r = -0.534 respectively), whereas collagen I correlated positively with collagen III (p = 0.001, r = 0.578). CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal microecological dysbiosis affects the occurrence of female POP, which could be considered a novel therapeutic option.


Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Vagina , Feminino , Humanos , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/metabolismo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Metaloproteinase 3 da Matriz/metabolismo , Decorina/metabolismo , Decorina/genética , Idoso , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta1/metabolismo , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta1/genética , Peróxido de Hidrogênio/metabolismo , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Histerectomia Vaginal , Colágeno Tipo I/metabolismo , Colágeno Tipo I/genética , Colágeno Tipo III/metabolismo , Colágeno Tipo III/genética , RNA Mensageiro/metabolismo , Ligamentos/metabolismo , Microbiota , Adulto
12.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(10): e37426, 2024 Mar 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38457577

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to compare survival outcomes of 3 different radical hysterectomy (RH) types, namely total abdominal radical hysterectomy (TARH), total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH), and laparoscopy-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH), in patients with FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer. We retrospectively identified a cohort of patients who underwent RH for cervical cancer between 2010 and 2017. Patients with stage IB2 cervical cancer were included and were classified into TARH, TLRH, and LARVH treatment groups. Survival outcomes were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to estimate the independent association of RH technique with outcome. 194 patients were included in this study: 79 patients in the TARH group, 55 in the TLRH group, and 60 in the LARVH group. No significant differences were found in clinicopathological characteristics between the 3 RH groups. On comparing survival outcomes with TARH, both TLRH and LARVH showed no significant difference in terms of 5-year overall survival (TARH vs TLRH, P = .121 and TARH vs LARVH, P = .436). Conversely, compared to the TARH group, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly worse in the TLRH group (P = .034) but not in the LARVH group (P = .288). Multivariate analysis showed that TLRH surgical approach (hazard ratio, 3.232; 95% confidence interval, 1.238-8.438; P = .017) was an independent prognostic factor for PFS in patients with IB2 cervical cancer. Our study suggests that in patients with FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer, among the minimally invasive RH approaches, TLRH and LARVH, only TLRH approach was associated with worse PFS when compared with the TARH approach.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Intervalo Livre de Doença
13.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(13): e37551, 2024 Mar 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38552066

RESUMO

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility, indications, and benefits of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (v-NOTES) hysterectomy for nonmalignant gynecological diseases. The clinical data, including the baseline information and surgical conditions of 81 patients who underwent v-NOTES hysterectomy for nonmalignant gynecological diseases in a tertiary university hospital from October 2018 to August 2022, were retrospectively analyzed and compared with the total laparoscopic hysterectomy group (200 cases) and the transumbilical laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgery group (150 cases). In comparison with the other 2 groups, the highest proportion of patients in the v-NOTES group had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Accordingly, mean preoperative uterine volume measured by sonography was significantly smaller in the v-notes group. In the v-NOTES group, the mean number of vaginal deliveries and age were significantly higher, while the mean number of previous abdominal surgeries was lower compared to the other 2 groups. The V-NOTES group had a shorter operation time, shorter postoperative urinary catheter insertion time, earlier intestinal recovery days, shorter hospital stay, and lower visual analogue scale scores after surgery, and the differences were statistically significant. When indicated appropriately, v-NOTES hysterectomy can be a feasible and advantageous surgical modality. In particular, in comparison to the laparoendoscopic Single Site Surgery and total laparoscopic hysterectomy groups, the v-NOTES group had advantages in postoperative recovery and had more aesthetic surgical results.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Histerectomia/métodos , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos
14.
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol ; 33(3): 163-170, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38353421

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Comparison of the applicability, safety, and surgical outcomes of total vaginal NOTES hysterectomy (TVNH) using natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, which is considered a natural orifice surgery for hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (HBSO) in virgin transgender men, with conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2019 and 2021. The results of transgender male individuals who underwent HBSO operations using TVNH (n = 21) were compared with those who underwent operations using TLH (n = 62). RESULTS: TVNH was performed in 21 individuals, while TLH was performed in 62 individuals. Patients in the TVNH approach group had a longer operation duration than those in the TLH group (p = .001). Patients in the TVNH group experienced less pain at two hours (5 ± 1.56), six hours (4 ± 1.57), 12 h (2 ± 0.91), and 24 h (1 ± 0.62) postoperatively (p = .001). The postoperative hospitalization duration was shorter in the TVNH group (1.6 ± 1.01) than in the TLH group (2.9 ± 0.5) (p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: For the HBSO operation of female-to-male transgender individuals, TVNH, which is completely endoscopically performed, can be preferred and safely conducted as an alternative surgical method to conventional laparoscopy.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Pessoas Transgênero , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Feminino , Adulto , Masculino , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Histerectomia/métodos , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Duração da Cirurgia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Salpingo-Ooforectomia/métodos
15.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(5): 985-993, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38416155

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Patient-reported outcomes are relevant outcomes in studies on pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery, as anatomical recurrence alone does not have a significant correlation with perceived improvement. In the present study, the patient's impression of improvement after 1 year is studied after vaginal hysterectomy (VH) versus sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH) in large cohorts from daily clinical practice. We hypothesize that there is no difference between the groups. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis on prospectively collected data in a multicenter cohort of patients who underwent VH or SSH for symptomatic POP. All patients had a POP-Q stage ≥ 2 in at least one compartment at baseline and were treated with VH or SSH between 2002 and 2019. The primary outcome was the patient-reported score on the patient global impression of improvement index (PGI-I) 1 year after surgery. The secondary outcome was a composite outcome of surgical success, defined as the absence of recurrent POP beyond the hymen with bothersome bulge symptoms and/or repeat surgery. RESULTS: A total of 378 women (196 VH and 182 SSH) were included. The median score on the PGI-I did not differ between VH and SSH. At 1 year post-operatively, 77 women after VH (73%) and 77 women after SSH (75%) considered their condition (very) much improved (p = 0.86). There was no difference in composite outcome of surgical success (126 out of 137 women [92%] after VH, 118 out of 125 women [94%] after SSH; p = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that there was no difference in the type of surgery, VH or SSH, with regard to the patient's impression of improvement 1 year postoperatively in a large cohort from daily clinical practice.


Assuntos
Histerectomia Vaginal , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Humanos , Feminino , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Prospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
16.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 103(6): 1165-1174, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38382912

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Vaginal surgery has a superior outcome profile compared with other surgical routes, yet skills are declining because of low case volumes. Graduating residents' confidence and preparedness for vaginal surgery has plummeted in the past decade. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether procedure-specific simulation skills, vs usual training, result in improved operative competence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We completed a randomized controlled trial of didactic and procedural training via low fidelity vaginal surgery models for anterior repair, posterior repair (PR), vaginal hysterectomy (VH), recruiting novice gynecology residents at three academic centers. We evaluated performance via global rating scale (GRS) in the real operating room and for corresponding procedures by attending surgeon blinded to group. Prespecified secondary outcomes included procedural steps knowledge, overall performance, satisfaction, self-confidence and intraoperative parameters. A priori sample size estimated 50 residents (20% absolute difference in GRS score, 25% SD, 80% power, alpha 0.05). CLINICALTRIALS: gov: Registration no. NCT05887570. RESULTS: We randomized 83 residents to intervention or control and 55 completed the trial (2011-23). Baseline characteristics were similar, except for more fourth-year control residents. After adjustment of confounders (age, level, baseline knowledge), GRS scores showed significant differences overall (mean difference 8.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.2-16.1; p = 0.044) and for VH (mean difference 12.0; 95% CI: 1.8-22.3; p = 0.02). The intervention group had significantly higher procedural steps knowledge and self-confidence for VH and/or PR (p < 0.05, adjusted analysis). Estimated blood loss, operative time and complications were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to usual training, procedure-specific didactic and low fidelity simulation modules for vaginal surgery resulted in significant improvements in operative performance and several other skill parameters.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Internato e Residência , Treinamento por Simulação , Vagina , Humanos , Feminino , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos , Adulto , Vagina/cirurgia , Histerectomia Vaginal/educação , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/educação , Ginecologia/educação
17.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(3): 689-694, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38393333

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Ureteral injuries are the most feared complications of gynecological surgery and therefore intraoperative recognition is of the utmost importance. Intraoperative cystoscopy represents the diagnostics of choice to investigate ureteral patency thanks to the direct visualization of ureteral flows after administration of infusion mediums. In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of saline versus mannitol intraoperative cystoscopy in terms of false negatives in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy and high uterosacral ligament suspension for POP. Patients were divided in two groups based on the use of saline or mannitol medium for intraoperative cystoscopy. Postoperative daily control of serum creatinine was performed until discharge, as well as urinary tract imaging, in symptomatic patients. RESULTS: A total of 925 patients underwent vaginal hysterectomy followed by high USL suspension for POP. Saline and mannitol medium were used in 545 patients and 380 patients respectively. Postoperative ureteral injuries were identified in 12 patients, specifically in 2% of the saline group and in 0.3% of the mannitol group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of mannitol instead of saline as a bladder distension medium was able to significantly reduce the occurrence of postoperative ureteral sequelae.


Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Retenção Urinária , Doenças Urológicas , Feminino , Humanos , Bexiga Urinária , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Diafragma da Pelve/cirurgia , Manitol , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Retenção Urinária/cirurgia , Ligamentos/cirurgia
18.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 31(5): 406-413, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38336010

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether minimally invasive Sacrohysteropexy (SH) is non-inferior to vaginal hysterectomy (VH) with uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) in women with symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, non-inferiority study. SETTING: Tertiary university-based hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 146 patients with uterovaginal prolapse between July 2016 and August 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either laparoscopic or robotic SH surgery or VH with USLS surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was prolapse recurrence at 1 year after surgery, defined as prolapse ≥ stage 2 evaluated using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system, bothersome vaginal bulge symptoms, or retreatment for prolapse. The secondary outcomes included operation time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, operation-related complications, pain intensity, quality of life, and activities of daily living. Of 146 women who underwent randomization, 73 in the SH group and 73 in the VH with USLS group were analyzed. SH was non-inferior for recurrence compared with VH with USLS (16.4% vs 15.8%, 95% confidence interval: -13.0% to 14.2%). Operating duration and transvaginal length were significantly longer in the SH group, while there were no significant differences in the estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, or postoperative complication rates. Although perioperative pain intensity was greater from 1 week to 1 month in the SH group, the quality of life and activities of daily living did not differ between the groups throughout postoperative year 1. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic or robotic SH was non-inferior to VH with USLS for the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse at the 1-year follow-up.


Assuntos
Histerectomia Vaginal , Laparoscopia , Ligamentos , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Humanos , Feminino , Histerectomia Vaginal/métodos , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Ligamentos/cirurgia , Idoso , Laparoscopia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Recidiva , Resultado do Tratamento , Duração da Cirurgia , Tempo de Internação , Qualidade de Vida , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica
19.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(2): 451-456, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38206339

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We developed a summative assessment tool to evaluate competent performance on three procedure-specific low fidelity simulation models for vaginal surgery. Our purpose was to determine a pass-fail score for each model. METHODS: We enrolled participants (2011-2023, three Canadian academic centers) and grouped them according to operative competency in vaginal procedures. Novice operators were medical students recruited through targeted advertisement to clerkship level medical students. Proficient operators consisted of gynecology residents from the intervention arm of a randomized controlled trial, trained to competence in the use of the models; urogynecology fellows and attending gynecologic surgeons recruited through departmental rounds. All participants were asked to perform the three procedures on the models, were videotaped, and their performance assessed by evaluators familiar with the procedure and the scoring system, blinded to operator identity. A total performance score (range 0-400) assessed timing and errors. Basic skill deductions were set a priori. We calculated sensitivity and specificity scores and obtained an optimal cutoff based on Youden's J statistic. RESULTS: For anterior repair, we rated 46 novice and 16 proficient videos. The pass-fail score was 170/400. For posterior repair, we rated 54 novice and 14 proficient videos. The pass-fail score was 140/400. For vaginal hysterectomy, we rated 47 novice and 12 proficient videos. The pass-fail score was 180/400. Scores of proficient operators were significantly better than those of novice participants (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: A pass-fail score can distinguish between novice and proficient operators and can be used for summative assessment of surgical skill.


Assuntos
Colpotomia , Cirurgiões , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Canadá , Simulação por Computador , Histerectomia Vaginal
20.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(1): 227-236, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38165443

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Women with central sensitisation syndrome (CSS) experience poorer subjective post-operative outcomes even after successful pelvic floor reconstruction. This study tests the hypothesis that women with pelvic floor symptoms (PFS) without relevant pelvic organ prolapse (POP), are more likely to have CSS. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to women who participated in the POP-UP study in 2017. The POP-UP study evaluated POP in 247 women 16 years after laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy. POP-Q data and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) results were used and supplemented with CSS-specific questionnaires. A Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI) score above 40 implicates CSS. Women were divided into groups based on POP beyond the hymen in relation to the PFDI-20 score. Outcomes of women with PFS and without POP (called 'group 1') were compared with the rest of the cohort (groups 2-4; women without PFS and/or with POP). RESULTS: A total of 136 women were included in the analysis. A CSI score above 40 was present in 16 out of 42 women of group 1 (37%) versus 11 out of 93 women of groups 2-4 (12%), p < 0.0001. Passive coping was more prevalent in group 1 (p = 0.039), and more deviations in somatisation, depression, anxiety and distress were found in group 1 (p values of < 0.0001, 0.018, 0.003 and 0.002 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that CSS might be more prevalent in women with PFS without relevant POP. More awareness of CSS and valid individual counselling may overcome unnecessary surgery for POP and help in setting realistic expectations.


Assuntos
Diafragma da Pelve , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Feminino , Humanos , Diafragma da Pelve/cirurgia , Sensibilização do Sistema Nervoso Central , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/complicações , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários , Histerectomia Vaginal , Qualidade de Vida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...