RESUMO
Until the discovery of the gene for cystic fibrosis (CF) in 1989, diagnostic developments were limited, and treatment focused on symptom alleviation. However, following the genetic breakthrough, some 2,000 mutations of the gene have been identified. More recently CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulator triple therapy (CFTRm) has been introduced in the form of triple therapy with ivacaftor, lumacaftor and tezacaftor (ETI), in the United States from 2019, Europe from 2020 and then Australia from 2021. The new treatment option has revolutionised both the quality of life and life expectancy of many persons diagnosed with CF. This editorial reviews major developments in the clinical care that can now be provided to patients, and reflects on the legal and ethical ramifications of the improved situation for many patients in the contexts of medical negligence, damages assessment, family law and criminal law. It also considers the difficult issues of access and equity caused by the limited availability of the triple therapy in low- and middle-income countries.
Assuntos
Aminofenóis , Regulador de Condutância Transmembrana em Fibrose Cística , Fibrose Cística , Quinolonas , Humanos , Quinolonas/uso terapêutico , Aminofenóis/uso terapêutico , Regulador de Condutância Transmembrana em Fibrose Cística/genética , Aminopiridinas/uso terapêutico , Benzodioxóis/uso terapêutico , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Austrália , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Healthcare provision takes place in a variety of contexts, with variations of resources available to practitioners and their patients. Effects from the COVID-19 pandemic superimposed on existing system demands have driven increasing concern about resource limitations, particularly in rural and remote settings. This article explores the legal liability of medical practitioners and healthcare services with respect to actions in negligence arising from harm to patients suffered, either partly or wholly, as a result of resource limitations.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Responsabilidade Legal , Imperícia , Humanos , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Recursos em Saúde , Atenção à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
From the point of view of legislation, medical care refers to the provision of services, however, the issues of legal responsibility of a medical worker, which is imposed in case of violation of the rights of a patient, are quite difficult and are characterized by controversial points for assessment. Today, a large number of complaints from patients are filed against doctors, requiring consideration by the competent authorities. The article considers the features of civil, administrative and criminal liability applied to medical workers.
Assuntos
Responsabilidade Legal , Humanos , Federação Russa , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Pessoal de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Global interest in circumcision, one of the oldest and most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide, continues. There is a significant increase in cases regarding medical malpractice claims in the world and in our country. It is aimed to identify situations that lead to malpractice claims in circumcision surgery, which has question marks regarding its psychological and ethical aspects, to identify situations that are considered errors and professionally risky, and to contribute to eliminating these deficiencies. METHODS: We examined the Supreme Court appeal decisions related to circumcision malpractice cases resolved between 2012 and 2022, using the keyword "circumcision" on the official website of the Republic of Turkiye Supreme Court. RESULTS: We examined 30 Supreme Court decisions that met our criteria. It was determined that the most common lawsuit was filed due to negligence (43.3%), followed by carelessness (20%) and faulty action (20%). CONCLUSION: Physical conditions must be appropriate and healthcare personnel must be adequately trained for circumcision, which is frequently performed especially in pediatric patients and is more frequently subject to malpractice lawsuits than other pediatric operations.
Assuntos
Circuncisão Masculina , Imperícia , Decisões da Suprema Corte , Humanos , Circuncisão Masculina/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Erros Médicos/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
Cosmetic filler injections have gained popularity in recent years, but the rise in complications has led to an increase in legal disputes. This study analyzes civil court rulings related to cosmetic filler injection lawsuits in South Korea from 2007 to 2023. A retrospective case analysis was performed using a systematic database search, and a mixed-methods approach was employed for data analysis. The study examined 27 cases, revealing a high rate of liability findings against medical practitioners. Skin necrosis and blindness were the most common complications, and intravascular filler injection was recognized as negligence. Violation of informed consent was found in most cases, with mean compensation awards of ₩193,019,107 KRW ($142,831 USD) for first instance cases and ₩81,845,052 KRW ($60,564 USD) for second instance cases. The findings emphasize the importance of practitioner awareness, adherence to precautionary measures, and proactive prevention and management of complications. Collaboration among stakeholders is crucial for developing strategies that prioritize patient safety and minimize legal disputes in the aesthetic medicine industry. This study provides valuable insights for enhancing medical practices and safeguarding patient well-being in the field of cosmetic filler injections.
Assuntos
Técnicas Cosméticas , Preenchedores Dérmicos , Humanos , República da Coreia , Preenchedores Dérmicos/efeitos adversos , Técnicas Cosméticas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Responsabilidade Legal , Masculino , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudênciaAssuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Masculino , Evolução Fatal , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/patologia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , AutopsiaRESUMO
Federal and state governments mandate some health care organizations to implement antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs). Some early adopters developed model ASPs that have helped set industry standards; other benchmarks will likely be forged in subsequent regulation, legislation, and jurisprudence. This article considers how ASP designs can affect professional autonomy, especially of frontline antibiotic stewards who are usually physicians and pharmacists. This article also considers how ASP development and implementation might influence standards of care and malpractice liability.
Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Responsabilidade Legal , Médicos , Autonomia Profissional , Humanos , Gestão de Antimicrobianos/legislação & jurisprudência , Médicos/ética , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Farmacêuticos/ética , Padrão de Cuidado/éticaRESUMO
The relationship between a doctor and a patient is a contract, retaining the essential elements of the tort. Modern medical practice has evolved alongside the court of law to regulate the conduct of doctors and hospitals to reduce litigations of medical negligence. Lately, Indian patients have become more aware of their rights and the Consumer Protection Act. This awareness encourages patients to litigate and seek the help of redressal forums to mitigate their loss/injury in cases of medical negligence. Though there is a rise in complaints of medical negligence filed against doctors and hospitals, these allegations are often frivolous. The specter of litigation constantly looms over medical practitioners, who frequently struggle to defend themselves in a court of law, causing undue anxiety and anguish. Thus, a doctor can be considered the second victim in a medical negligence case. Lack of awareness regarding their legal rights and pertinent laws coupled with contradictory actions of the law enforcement agencies while handling alleged medical negligence cases worsens a doctor's trepidation. Hence, this article attempts to raise awareness among medical professionals, which will thereby allay undue fear while facing an allegation.
Assuntos
Imperícia , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Índia , Humanos , Responsabilidade Legal , Médicos/legislação & jurisprudênciaAssuntos
Cesárea , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Consultores , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Reino UnidoRESUMO
This paper examines the legal challenges associated with medical robots, including their legal status, liability in cases of malpractice, and concerns over patient data privacy and security. And this paper scrutinizes China's nuanced response to these dilemmas. An analysis of Chinese judicial practices and legislative actions reveals that current denial of legal personality to AI at this stage is commendable. To effectively control the financial risks associated with medical robots, there is an urgent need for clear guidelines on responsibility allocation for medical accidents involving medical robots, the implementation of strict data protection laws, and the strengthening of industry standards and regulations.
Assuntos
Responsabilidade Legal , Robótica , Humanos , China , Robótica/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Segurança Computacional/legislação & jurisprudência , Confidencialidade/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
Legal proceedings for medical negligence usually origin from painful events and their management is often complex, also at an emotional level, both for the families involved and for the physicians assumed to carry responsibility. Many of these aspects are unfamiliar and unclear to the doctors themselves who then need to interact, together with their lawyers, with judges who must take serious decisions on technical facts not easy to be fully comprehended by non-medical persons.On the basis of our different and highly specific personal experience, we have tried to clarify some of the fundamental issues concerning medico-legal cases. Accordingly, we have discussed the different types of guilt, made the distinction between civil and penal cases, with special focus on one issue which is particularly critical, namely that of the importance of guidelines. We have presented some examples of clinical cases and highlighted some glaring differences existing in the management of medico-legal cases between Italy and the United States. Despite obvious complexities, these differences might suggest some approaches toward the simplification of these proceedings and the shortening of the time involved to reach a conclusion.