Immune killer cells treatment for previously treated stage IV NSCLC patients.

The 5-year survival is poor for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, cell immunotherapy has emerged as a new treatment strategy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Immune killer cells (IKC) in patients with stage IV NSCLC after the failure of prior chemotherapy. This study enrolled 26 patients with stage IV NSCLC who failed at least two lines of chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy. The IKC was given alone weekly for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), pain intensity, quality of life (QOL), and safety. The median PFS for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (i.e., all enrolled patients) was 3.8 month. In the per-protocol (PP) population (i.e., patients receiving > 12 IKC infusions), the median PFS was 5.6 months. Moreover, the ITT population showed a 1-year survival rate of 60.0%, while that for the PP population was 85.7%. Only 7 out of 200 AEs (3.5%) were related to the IKC infusion, and they were all rated as grade 1 in severity. The IKC infusion was well tolerated. This novel immunotherapy prolonged the PFS and improved the survival compared with historical data. It might be a potential treatment strategy for stage IV NSCLC patient who failed prior chemotherapy.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03499834.

Traversing the bench to bedside journey for iNKT cell therapies.

Invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells are immune cells that harness properties of both the innate and adaptive immune system and exert multiple functions critical for the control of various diseases. Prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) by iNKT cells has been demonstrated in mouse models and in correlative human studies in which high iNKT cell content in the donor graft is associated with reduced GVHD in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants. This suggests that approaches to increase the number of iNKT cells in the setting of an allogeneic transplant may reduce GVHD. iNKT cells can also induce cytolysis of tumor cells, and murine experiments demonstrate that activating iNKT cells in vivo or treating mice with ex vivo expanded iNKT cells can reduce tumor burden. More recently, research has focused on testing anti-tumor efficacy of iNKT cells genetically modified to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) protein (CAR-iNKT) cells to enhance iNKT cell tumor killing. Further, several of these approaches are now being tested in clinical trials, with strong safety signals demonstrated, though efficacy remains to be established following these early phase clinical trials. Here we review the progress in the field relating to role of iNKT cells in GVHD prevention and anti- cancer efficacy. Although the iNKT field is progressing at an exciting rate, there is much to learn regarding iNKT cell subset immunophenotype and functional relationships, optimal ex vivo expansion approaches, ideal treatment protocols, need for cytokine support, and rejection risk of iNKT cells in the allogeneic setting.

Bayesian network analysis of risk classification strategies in the regulation of cellular products.

Cell therapy, a burgeoning therapeutic strategy, necessitates a scientific regulatory framework but faces challenges in risk-based regulation due to the lack of a global consensus on risk classification. This study applies Bayesian network analysis to compare and evaluate the risk classification strategies for cellular products proposed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), and World Health Organization (WHO), using real-world data to validate the models. The appropriateness of key risk factors is assessed within the three regulatory frameworks, along with their implications for clinical safety. The results indicate several directions for refining risk classification approaches. Additionally, a substudy focuses on a specific type of cell and gene therapy (CGT), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. It underscores the importance of considering CAR targets, tumor types, and costimulatory domains when assessing the safety risks of CAR T cell products. Overall, there is currently a lack of a regulatory framework based on real-world data for cellular products and a lack of risk-based classification review methods. This study aims to improve the regulatory system for cellular products, emphasizing risk-based classification. Furthermore, the study advocates for leveraging machine learning in regulatory science to enhance the assessment of cellular product safety, illustrating the role of Bayesian networks in aiding regulatory decision-making for the risk classification of cellular products.

Advances in manufacturing chimeric antigen receptor immune cell therapies.

Biomedical research has witnessed significant strides in manufacturing chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies, marking a transformative era in cellular immunotherapy. Nevertheless, existing manufacturing methods for autologous cell therapies still pose several challenges related to cost, immune cell source, safety risks, and scalability. These challenges have motivated recent efforts to optimize process development and manufacturing for cell therapies using automated closed-system bioreactors and models created using artificial intelligence. Simultaneously, non-viral gene transfer methods like mRNA, CRISPR genome editing, and transposons are being applied to engineer T cells and other immune cells like macrophages and natural killer cells. Alternative sources of primary immune cells and stem cells are being developed to generate universal, allogeneic therapies, signaling a shift away from the current autologous paradigm. These multifaceted innovations in manufacturing underscore a collective effort to propel this therapeutic approach toward broader clinical adoption and improved patient outcomes in the evolving landscape of cancer treatment. Here, we review current CAR immune cell manufacturing strategies and highlight recent advancements in cell therapy scale-up, automation, process development, and engineering.

Approved CAR-T therapies have reproducible efficacy and safety in clinical practice.

CAR-T cell therapy has established itself as a highly effective treatment for hematological malignancies. There are currently six commercial CAR-T products that have been FDA approved for diseases such as B-ALL, LBCL, MCL, FL, MM, and CLL/SLL. "Real-world" studies allow us to evaluate outcomes from the general population to determine their efficacy and safety compared to those who were included in the original trials. Based on several well conducted "Real-world" studies that represent diverse populations, we report that outcomes from the original trials that led to the approval of these therapies are comparable to those in practice.

CAR T cell therapy for refractory pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus: a new era of hope?

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune condition that can affect multiple organ systems and is heterogenous in its presentation and response to therapy. When diagnosed in childhood, SLE is associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared to adult SLE, often requiring substantial immunosuppression with the risk of significant side effects. There remains a significant unmet need for new therapies that can improve disease control and reduce glucocorticoid and other toxic medication exposure for patients with severe or refractory disease. The pathogenesis of SLE involves B cell dysregulation and autoantibody production, which are a hallmark of the disease. Currently approved B cell directed therapies often result in incomplete B cell depletion and may not target long-lived plasma cells responsible for SLE autoantibodies. It is hypothesized that by persistently eliminating both B cells and plasmablasts, CAR T therapy can halt autoimmunity and prevent organ damage in patient's refractory to current B cell-depleting treatments. Herein we summarize the current preclinical and clinical data utilizing CAR T cells for SLE and discuss the future of this treatment modality for lupus.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of cross-reactive Fibroblast activation protein scFv-based CAR-T cells.

Introduction: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) overexpression on cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) is associated with poor prognosis and worse clinical outcomes. Selective ablation of pro-tumorgenic FAP+ stromal cells with CAR-T cells may be a new therapeutic strategy. However, the clinical use of FAP-CAR T cells is suggested to proceed with caution for occasional poor efficacy and induction of on-target off-tumor toxicity (OTOT), including lethal osteotoxicity and cachexia. Hence, more investigations and preclinical trials are required to optimize the FAP-CAR T cells and to approve their safety and efficacy. Methods: In this study, we designed second-generation CAR T cells targeting FAP with 4-1BB as a co-stimulatory molecule, and tested their cytotoxicity against FAP-positive cells (hFAP-HT1080 cells and a variety of primary CAFs) in vitro and in Cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) and a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model. Results: Results showed that our FAP-CAR T cells were powerfully potent in killing human and murine FAP-positive tumor cells and CAFs in multiple types of tumors in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice and in patient-derived xenografts (PDX) model. And they were proved to be biologically safe and exhibit low-level OTOT. Discussion: Taken together, the human/murine cross-reactive FAP-CAR T cells were powerfully potent in killing human and murine FAP positive tumor cells and CAFs. They were biologically safe and exhibit low-level OTOT, warranting further clinical investigation into our FAP-CAR T cells.

Novel prognostic scoring systems for severe CRS and ICANS after anti-CD19 CAR T cells in large B-cell lymphoma.

Autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are now used in routine practice for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Severe (grade ≥ 3) cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) are still the most concerning acute toxicities leading to frequent intensive care unit (ICU) admission, prolonging hospitalization, and adding significant cost to treatment. We report on the incidence of CRS and ICANS and the outcomes in a large cohort of 925 patients with LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) in France based on patient data captured through the DESCAR-T registry. CRS of any grade occurred in 778 patients (84.1%), with 74 patients (8.0%) with grade 3 CRS or higher, while ICANS of any grade occurred in 375 patients (40.5%), with 112 patients (12.1%) with grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Based on the parameters selected by multivariable analyses, two independent prognostic scoring systems (PSS) were derived, one for grade ≥ 3 CRS and one for grade ≥ 3 ICANS. CRS-PSS included bulky disease, a platelet count < 150 G/L, a C-reactive protein (CRP) level > 30 mg/L and no bridging therapy or stable or progressive disease (SD/PD) after bridging. Patients with a CRS-PSS score > 2 had significantly higher risk to develop grade ≥ 3 CRS. ICANS-PSS included female sex, low level of platelets (< 150 G/L), use of axi-cel and no bridging therapy or SD/PD after bridging. Patients with a CRS-PSS score > 2 had significantly higher risk to develop grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Both scores were externally validated in international cohorts of patients treated with tisa-cel or axi-cel.

Feasibility of collecting longitudinal patient-reported outcomes in individuals with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy.

PURPOSE: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy has shown clinical efficacy in refractory and relapsed large B-cell lymphomas, but is associated with serious acute and long-term toxicities. To understand the patient perspective, we measured a patient-reported outcome (PRO), specifically, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), at multiple time points over one year. METHODS: This was a prospective feasibility study of a cohort of patients who were eligible for standard of care CART therapy, tisagenlecleucel. Demographic data and disease characteristics were collected. HRQoL was measured using FACT-Lym at baseline, and months 1, 3, 6 and 12. FACT-Lym includes FACT-G (physical, social, emotional and functional well-being domains), plus a lymphoma subscale. RESULTS: Thirty-four of 35 patients approached, consented to participate. Two of them did not receive their infusion due to progressive disease. 50% were female and median age was 62 (23-77). Twenty-nine patients (91%) completed baseline FACT-Lym and 20 of 21 (95%) eligible patients completed 12-month FACT-Lym. 52% completed all 4 post-baseline FACT-Lym measures. Exploratory analyses for changes in FACT-Lym scores are reported. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to measure longitudinal PROs in patients who receive CART therapy. This study will inform future studies in evaluating the patient perspective on CART therapy.

CAR-T lymphocyte-based cell therapies; mechanistic substantiation, applications and biosafety enhancement with suicide genes: new opportunities to melt side effects.

Immunotherapy has made significant strides in cancer treatment with strategies like checkpoint blockade antibodies and adoptive T cell transfer. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) have emerged as a promising approach to combine these strategies and overcome their limitations. This review explores CAR-T cells as a living drug for cancer treatment. CAR-T cells are genetically engineered immune cells designed to target and eliminate tumor cells by recognizing specific antigens. The study involves a comprehensive literature review on CAR-T cell technology, covering structure optimization, generations, manufacturing processes, and gene therapy strategies. It examines CAR-T therapy in haematologic cancers and solid tumors, highlighting challenges and proposing a suicide gene-based mechanism to enhance safety. The results show significant advancements in CAR-T technology, particularly in structure optimization and generation. The manufacturing process has improved for broader clinical application. However, a series of inherent challenges and side effects still need to be addressed. In conclusion, CAR-T cells hold great promise for cancer treatment, but ongoing research is crucial to improve efficacy and safety for oncology patients. The proposed suicide gene-based mechanism offers a potential solution to mitigate side effects including cytokine release syndrome (the most common toxic side effect of CAR-T therapy) and the associated neurotoxicity.

Comparing 2-day vs 3-day flu-CY lymphodepleting regimens for CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in patients with non-hodgkin's lymphoma.

Introduction: Lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC) is critical to CAR T-cell expansion and efficacy. Despite this, there is not a consensus in the literature regarding the optimal LDC regimen, including dose and frequency. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients at a single institution that received LDC prior to treatment with the CD19 directed CAR T-cell products axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel. Patients treated at our center received fludarabine 30 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 for 3 consecutive days prior to May 2019. After this timepoint patients routinely received fludarabine 40 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 for 2 consecutive days. Clinical data from each cohort were obtained from the electronic medical record and compared for differences in CAR T-cell efficacy and toxicity. Results: From June 2018 to August 2023, LDC was given to 92 patients prior to CD19 directed CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Twenty-eight patients received a 3-day regimen, and 64 patients received a 2-day regimen. In the total cohort, 75% of patients received axicabtagene ciloleucel and 25% received tisagenlecleucel. The overall response rates in both the 2-day regimen group and the 3-day regimen group were similar (69% vs 75%, p= 0.21) as were the complete response rates (50% vs 54%, p=0.82). There were no significant differences between the 2-day and 3-day regimens for grade 2-4 cytokine release syndrome (55% vs 50%, p=0.82), grade 2-4 immune effector cell associated-neurotoxicity syndrome (42% vs 29%, p=0.25), or time to resolution of neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. The rate of prolonged platelet recovery lasting greater than 60 days was higher with the 3-day regimen (9% vs 27%, p=0.026). Discussion: As the number of patients eligible for CAR T-cell therapy continues to increase, optimizing each component of therapy is necessary. We show that a 2-day regimen of LDC with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide is feasible without significant impact on CAR T-cell efficacy or toxicity. Prospective studies are necessary to further determine the most effective LDC regimen.

[Clinical efficacy and safety of blinatumomab bridging CAR-T cell therapy in the treatment of patients with adult acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia].

Objective: Exploring the efficacy and safety of bridging blinatumomab (BiTE) in combination with chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy for the treatment of adult patients with acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) . Methods: Clinical data from 36 adult B-ALL patients treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University from August 2018 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 36 cases were included: 18 men and 18 women. The median age was 43.5 years (21-72 years). Moreover, 21 cases of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia were reported, and 16 of these cases were relapsed or refractory. Eighteen patients underwent blinatumomab bridging followed by CAR-T cell therapy, and 18 patients received CAR-T cell therapy. This study analyzed the efficacy and safety of treatment in two groups of patients. Results: In the BiTE bridge-to-CAR-T group, 16 patients achieved complete remission (CR) after BiTE immunotherapy, with a CR rate of 88.9%. One month after bridging CAR-T therapy, bone marrow examination showed a CR rate of 100.0%, and the minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate was higher than the nonbridging therapy group (94.4% vs. 61.1%, Fisher, P=0.041). The incidence of cytokine release syndrome and other adverse reactions in the BiTE bridge-to-CAR-T group was lower than that in the nonbridging therapy group (11.1% vs. 50.0%, Fisher, P=0.027). The follow-up reveals that 13 patients continued to maintain MRD negativity, and five patients experienced relapse 8.40 months (2.57-10.20 months) after treatment. Two of five patients with relapse achieved CR after receiving the second CAR-T cell therapy. In the nonbridging therapy group, 10 patients maintained continuous MRD negativity, 7 experienced relapse, and 6 died. The 1 year overall survival rate in the BiTE bridge-to-CAR-T group was higher than that in the nonbridging therapy group, with a statistically significant difference at the 0.1 level (88.9%±10.5% vs. 66.7%±10.9%, P=0.091) . Conclusion: BiTE bridging CAR-T cell therapy demonstrates excellent efficacy in adult B-ALL treatment, with a low recent recurrence rate and ongoing assessment of long-term efficacy during follow-up.

Riding the storm: managing cytokine-related toxicities in CAR-T cell therapy.

The advent of chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) has been a paradigm shift in cancer immunotherapeutics, with remarkable outcomes reported for a growing catalog of malignancies. While CAR-T are highly effective in multiple diseases, salvaging patients who were considered incurable, they have unique toxicities which can be life-threatening. Understanding the biology and risk factors for these toxicities has led to targeted treatment approaches which can mitigate them successfully. The three toxicities of particular interest are cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)-like syndrome (IEC-HS). Each of these is characterized by cytokine storm and hyperinflammation; however, they differ mechanistically with regard to the cytokines and immune cells that drive the pathophysiology. We summarize the current state of the field of CAR-T-associated toxicities, focusing on underlying biology and how this informs toxicity management and prevention. We also highlight several emerging agents showing promise in preclinical models and the clinic. Many of these established and emerging agents do not appear to impact the anti-tumor function of CAR-T, opening the door to additional and wider CAR-T applications.

Engineering strategies to safely drive CAR T-cells into the future.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has proven a breakthrough in cancer treatment in the last decade, giving unprecedented results against hematological malignancies. All approved CAR T-cell products, as well as many being assessed in clinical trials, are generated using viral vectors to deploy the exogenous genetic material into T-cells. Viral vectors have a long-standing clinical history in gene delivery, and thus underwent iterations of optimization to improve their efficiency and safety. Nonetheless, their capacity to integrate semi-randomly into the host genome makes them potentially oncogenic via insertional mutagenesis and dysregulation of key cellular genes. Secondary cancers following CAR T-cell administration appear to be a rare adverse event. However several cases documented in the last few years put the spotlight on this issue, which might have been underestimated so far, given the relatively recent deployment of CAR T-cell therapies. Furthermore, the initial successes obtained in hematological malignancies have not yet been replicated in solid tumors. It is now clear that further enhancements are needed to allow CAR T-cells to increase long-term persistence, overcome exhaustion and cope with the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. To this aim, a variety of genomic engineering strategies are under evaluation, most relying on CRISPR/Cas9 or other gene editing technologies. These approaches are liable to introduce unintended, irreversible genomic alterations in the product cells. In the first part of this review, we will discuss the viral and non-viral approaches used for the generation of CAR T-cells, whereas in the second part we will focus on gene editing and non-gene editing T-cell engineering, with particular regard to advantages, limitations, and safety. Finally, we will critically analyze the different gene deployment and genomic engineering combinations, delineating strategies with a superior safety profile for the production of next-generation CAR T-cell.

The Role of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Immune-Mediated Neurological Diseases.

Despite the use of 'high efficacy' disease-modifying therapies, disease activity and clinical progression of different immune-mediated neurological diseases continue for some patients, resulting in accumulating disability, deteriorating social and mental health, and high economic cost to patients and society. Although autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant is an effective treatment modality, it is an intensive chemotherapy-based therapy with a range of short- and long-term side-effects. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) has revolutionized the treatment of B-cell and other hematological malignancies, conferring long-term remission for otherwise refractory diseases. However, the toxicity of this treatment, particularly cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and the complexity of production necessitate the need for a high level of specialization at treating centers. Early-phase trials of CAR-T therapies in immune-mediated B cell driven conditions, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myasthenia gravis, have shown dramatic clinical response with few adverse events. Based on the common physiopathology, CAR-T therapy in other immune-mediated neurological disease, including multiple sclerosis, chronic inflammatory polyradiculopathy, autoimmune encephalitis, and stiff person syndrome, might be an effective option for patients, avoiding the need for long-term immunosuppressant medications. It may prove to be a more selective immunoablative approach than autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant, with potentially increased efficacy and lower adverse events. In this review, we present the state of the art and future directions of the use of CAR-T in such conditions. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:441-452.