Medical Ozone as a Therapeutic Option in Musculoskeletal Pain Control: A Critical Review of Clinical Trials Considering Safety and Quality Indicators for Procedures and Devices.

Background: Drug therapies have been widely applied for pain management, however, there are important side effects such as those related to corticosteroids and opioids. Recent studies demonstrated promising results using medical ozone as a safe, effective, and low-cost intervention for pain control. Objective: to review and critically analyze clinical studies that used ozone therapy for musculoskeletal pain. Methods: a literature search of various databases was performed to identify relevant studies. From a total of 249 records, 27 studies were included. Quality indicators, human and device factors that strongly influence the generation of evidence were considered, such as study design and device safety. We also mitigated biases, considering the safety and efficacy of the intervention itself. Results: Regarding safety, 77 (8%) of studies reported no adverse effects; concerning efficacy outcomes, medical ozone shows to be an effective intervention on musculoskeletal pain control. Important information about used devices were missing. Conclusions: medical ozone shows to be safe and effective; qualification of health professionals as well as the device safety are mandatory. However, there is a lack of requirements to identify the best therapeutic scheme; further longer, clinical and rigorous trials are needed.

[Quality Indicators of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Korea].

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a procedure that requires abundant clinical experience and endoscopic skills, and can lead to various complications, some of which may progress to life-threatening conditions. With expanding indications and technological advancements, ERCP is widely utilized, enhancing procedural accessibility. However, without proper quality management, the procedure can pose significant risks. Quality management in ERCP is essential to ensure safe and successful procedures and meet societal demands for improved healthcare competitiveness. To address these concerns, the Korean Society of Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy has developed a Korean-specific ERCP quality indicator reflecting domestic medical environments and realities. Initially, based on a review of foreign ERCP quality indicators and related literatures, key questions were formulated for five pre-procedural items, three intra-procedural items, and four post-procedural items. Descriptions and recommendations for each item were selected through peer evaluation. The developed Korean-specific ERCP quality indicator was reviewed by external experts based on the latest evidence and consensus in this fields. This Korean-specific indicator is expected to significantly contribute to improving ERCP quality in Korea, as it is tailored to local needs.

Using continuous glucose monitoring to measure and improve quality metrics: Updates on the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set 2024 Glucose Management Indicator measure.

Value-based diabetes care is a proactive approach to providing quality care to individuals with diabetes. This approach focuses on improving clinical outcomes rather than the volume of services provided. Implementation of value-based diabetes care requires an established set of standardized quality measures against which all stakeholders can assess and benchmark their performance. The National Committee for Quality Assurance recently added the Glucose Management Indicator to its Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set. The Glucose Management Indicator can be used as a measure of glucose control. This article discusses the benefits of value-based care, the importance of diabetes quality measures, and how the rapidly increasing adoption of continuous glucose monitoring is impacting these measures while improving the lives of individuals with diabetes.

Establishing Quality Indicators and Implementation Priorities for Post-Stroke Aphasia Services Through End-User Involvement.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no agreed quality standards for post-stroke aphasia services. Therefore, it is unknown if care reflects best practices or meets the expectations of people living with aphasia. We aimed to (1) shortlist, (2) operationalise and (3) prioritise best practice recommendations for post-stroke aphasia care. METHODS: Three phases of research were conducted. In Phase 1, recommendations with strong evidence and/or known to be important to people with lived experience of aphasia were identified. People with lived experience and health professionals rated the importance of each recommendation through a two-round e-Delphi exercise. Recommendations were then ranked for importance and feasibility and analysed using a graph theory-based voting system. In Phase 2, shortlisted recommendations from Phase 1 were converted into quality indicators for appraisal and voting in consensus meetings. In Phase 3, priorities for implementation were established by people with lived experience and health professionals following discussion and anonymous voting. FINDINGS: In Phase 1, 23 best practice recommendations were identified and rated by people with lived experience (n = 26) and health professionals (n = 81). Ten recommendations were shortlisted. In Phase 2, people with lived experience (n = 4) and health professionals (n = 17) reached a consensus on 11 quality indicators, relating to assessment (n = 2), information provision (n = 3), communication partner training (n = 3), goal setting (n = 1), person and family-centred care (n = 1) and provision of treatment (n = 1). In Phase 3, people with lived experience (n = 5) and health professionals (n = 7) identified three implementation priorities: assessment of aphasia, provision of aphasia-friendly information and provision of therapy. INTERPRETATION: Our 11 quality indicators and 3 implementation priorities are the first step to enabling systematic, efficient and person-centred measurement and quality improvement in post-stroke aphasia services. Quality indicators will be embedded in routine data collection systems, and strategies will be developed to address implementation priorities. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Protocol development was informed by our previous research, which explored the perspectives of 23 people living with aphasia about best practice aphasia services. Individuals with lived experience of aphasia participated as expert panel members in our three consensus meetings. We received support from consumer advisory networks associated with the Centre for Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation and Recovery and the Queensland Aphasia Research Centre.

Rates Of Patient Safety Indicators In Belgian Hospitals Were Low But Generally Higher Than In US Hospitals, 2016-18.

More than two decades ago, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality developed its Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) to monitor potentially preventable and severe adverse events within hospitals. Application of PSIs outside the US was explored more than a decade ago, but it is uncertain whether they remain relevant within Europe, as no up-to-date assessments of overall PSI-associated adverse event rates or interhospital variability can be found in the literature. This article assesses the nationwide occurrence and variability of thirteen adverse events for a case study of Belgium. We studied 4,765,850 patient stays across all 101 hospitals for 2016-18. We established that although adverse event rates were generally low, with an adverse event observed in 0.1 percent of medical hospital stays and in 1.2 percent of surgical hospital stays, they were higher than equivalent US rates and were prone to considerable between-hospital variability. Failure-to-rescue rates, for example, equaled 23 percent, whereas some hospitals exceeded nationwide central line-associated bloodstream infection rates by a factor of 8. Policy makers and hospital managers can prioritize PSIs that have high adverse event rates or large variability, such as failure to rescue or central line-associated bloodstream infections, to improve the quality of care in Belgian hospitals.

Quality indicators for occupational therapy: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Occupational therapists are increasingly asked to demonstrate the effectiveness, appropriateness, and efficiency of their interventions to funding bodies. However, the extent to which this is practiced and the health policy context within which such a practice is situated differs internationally. The aim of this scoping review was to establish which quality indicators are used internationally for this purpose. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review, limiting our search to Europe and the English-speaking world. To search for suitable literature, we used specialized databases from medicine, health sciences, and related fields, including CINAHL Complete and MEDLINE, as well as free internet search via Google. Furthermore, we contacted national occupational therapy associations from several countries asking for access to documents found within this search that were only accessible to association members. RESULTS: The screening process identified 32 studies and documents from six national contexts. We identified and described process-level indicators, functional outcome indicators, one outcome indicator based on individual goal attainment (the Goal Attainment Scale, or GAS), and PRO-Ergo, a patient-reported experience measure (PREM). There was little information on the use of quality indicators to demonstrate the effectiveness, appropriateness, and efficiency of occupational therapy services to funding bodies in Europe and the English-speaking world that was openly available. The identified process indicators were in most cases not specific to occupational therapy interventions. Functional outcome indicators were highly specific to certain client groups or health conditions and partially appropriate for use in occupational therapy. The GAS was found to be a highly customizable measure which allowed an evaluation on body structure and function levels as well as activity and participation levels. PRO-Ergo was focused on the clients' subjective view and their experience with occupational therapy interventions. CONCLUSIONS: All identified quality indicators have advantages and disadvantages. Process-level indicators specific to occupational therapy could be a chance to foster the use of best practice methods. GAS and PRO-Ergo seem to be the most versatile assessment, allowing an evaluation on the level of activity and participation. Functional outcome indicators that cover a broad area of client problems may be useful additional quality indicators for some areas of practice.

Assessing the Relationship between Hospital Process Digitalization and Hospital Quality - Evidence from Germany.

Hospital digitalization aims to increase efficiency, reduce costs, and/ or improve quality of care. To assess a digitalization-quality relationship, we investigate the association between process digitalization and process and outcome quality. We use data from the German DigitalRadar (DR) project from 2021 and combine these data with two process (preoperative waiting time for osteosynthesis and hip replacement surgery after femur fracture, n = 516 and 574) and two outcome quality indicators (mortality ratio of patients hospitalized for outpatient-acquired pneumonia, n = 1,074; ratio of new decubitus cases, n = 1,519). For each indicator, we run a univariate and a multivariate regression. We measure process digitalization holistically by specifying three models with different explanatory variables: (1) the total DR-score (0 (not digitalized) to 100 (fully digitalized)), (2) the sum of DR-score sub-dimensions' scores logically associated with an indicator, and (3) sub-dimensions' separate scores. For the process quality indicators, all but one of the associations are insignificant. A greater DR-score is weakly associated with a lower mortality ratio of pneumonia patients (p < 0.10 in the multivariate regression). In contrast, higher process digitalization is significantly associated with a higher ratio of decubitus cases (p < 0.01 for models (1) and (2), p < 0.05 for two sub-dimensions in model (3)). Regarding decubitus, our finding might be due to better diagnosis, documentation, and reporting of decubitus cases due to digitalization rather than worse quality. Insignificant and inconclusive results might be due to the indicators' inability to reflect quality variation and digitalization effects between hospitals. For future research, we recommend investigating within hospital effects with longitudinal data.

Redirection of low-acuity emergency department patients to nearby medical clinics using an electronic medical support system: effects on emergency department performance indicators.

BACKGROUND: Overcrowded emergency departments (EDs) are associated with higher morbidity and mortality and suboptimal quality-of-care. Most ED flow management strategies focus on early identification and redirection of low-acuity patients to primary care settings. To assess the impact of redirecting low-acuity ED patients to medical clinics using an electronic clinical decision support system on four ED performance indicators. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study in the ED of a Canadian tertiary trauma center where a redirection process for low-acuity patients was implemented. The process was based on a clinical decision support system relying on an algorithm based on chief complaint, performed by nurses at triage and not involving physician assessment. All patients visiting the ED from 2013 to 2017 were included. We compared ED performance indicators before and after implementation of the redirection process (June 2015): length-of-triage, time-to-initial-physician-assessment, length-of-stay and rate of patients leaving without being seen. We performed an interrupted time series analysis adjusted for age, gender, time of visit, triage category and overcrowding. RESULTS: Of 242,972 ED attendees over the study period, 9546 (8% of 121,116 post-intervention patients) were redirected to a nearby primary medical clinic. After the redirection process was implemented, length-of-triage increased by 1 min [1;2], time-to-initial assessment decreased by 13 min [-16;-11], length-of-stay for non-redirected patients increased by 29 min [13;44] (p < 0.001), minus 20 min [-42;1] (p = 0.066) for patients assigned to triage 5 category. The rate of patients leaving without being seen decreased by 2% [-3;-2] (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Implementing a redirection process for low-acuity ED patients based on a clinical support system was associated with improvements in two of four ED performance indicators.

Key needs, quality performance indicators and outcomes for patients with atrial fibrillation and multimorbidity: The AFFIRMO study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) often have concomitant long-term conditions that negatively impact their quality of life and the clinical management they receive. The AFFIRMO study aimed to identify the needs, quality performance indicators (QPIs), and outcomes relevant to patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) to improve the care of patients with AF. METHODS: An on-line survey to collect the key needs, QPIs, and outcomes relevant to patients with AF, their caregivers and HCPs, was distributed between May 2022 and January 2023 in five countries (UK, Italy, Denmark, Romania and Spain). Results from the on-line survey were discussed in a three-round Delphi process with international representatives of patients with AF, caregivers, and HCPs to determine the key needs, QPIs and outcomes for the management of patients with AF and multimorbidity. RESULTS: 659 patients (47.2% males, mean (SD) age 70.9 (10.2) years), 201 caregivers (26.9% males, mean (SD) age: 58.3 (SD 15.2) years), and 445 HCPs (57.8% males, mean (SD) age 47.4 (10.6) years) participated in the survey. An initial list of 27 needs, 9 QPIs, and 17 outcomes were identified. Eight patients, two caregivers, and 11 HCPs participated in the Delphi process. Nineteen (70%) needs, 8 (89%) QPIs, and 13 (76%) outcomes reached "consensus in", and were included in the final list. CONCLUSIONS: The final key needs, QPIs and outcomes obtained from the Delphi process will inform the AFFIRMO clinical trial, which aims to test the iABC app which incorporates an empowerment toolbox for patients and their caregivers, providing information to improve patient engagement and empowerment to help improve the clinical and self-management of patients with AF in the context of multimorbidity.

Performance analysis of indicators in teaching hospitals after the Health Transformation Plan: a Case Study in Iran.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine the status of performance indicators in hospitals affiliated with Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (QUMS) before and after the implementation of the Health Transformation Plan (HTP). METHODS: This longitudinal descriptive-analytical study was conducted utilizing hospital data. The study collected data using a checklist that included both general characteristics of the participating hospitals and performance indicators such as "the number of outpatient visits," "the number of paraclinical patients," "the number of surgeries," and "the number of inpatients" on a monthly basis for 2012-2019. The intervention examined in this study was the implementation of the HTP in May 2014. The data collected was analyzed using interrupted time series and STATA statistical software version 15. RESULTS: The study examined seven hospitals affiliated with QUMS, including general, trauma, pediatric, gynecology, and psychiatry hospitals. The findings indicated a significant increase in outpatient visits, paraclinical patients, and inpatients in the first month after the intervention. Specifically, there was an increase of 1739 in the number of outpatient visits, an increase of 513 in the number of paraclinical patients, and an increase of 135 in the number of inpatients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The HTP has improved patients' access to medical services. It achieved this by reducing out-of-pocket payments for healthcare services and implementing programs such as developing clinics, improving the quality of visits, and retaining doctors in deprived areas. The reduction in out-of-pocket payments has been particularly beneficial for individuals who lack financial resources and previously faced barriers to accessing healthcare services.

Characteristics of Medical Quality in Tertiary Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals by TOPSIS and RSR Methods.

Performance evaluation is important for improving medical quality and services. But, there is a lack of research for medical quality in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) hospitals. This study examines the medical quality and various indicators of tertiary public traditional Chinese medicine hospitals in Gansu Province, to establish a foundation for improving the medical and management standards of these hospitals. This study collected performance assessment data from 10 tertiary TCM hospitals in Gansu Province from 2019 to 2022. Thirteen indicators with TCM characteristics were selected and categorized into 3 aspects: control of medical costs, internal operational dimensions, and comprehensive management. The level of medical quality in different hospitals and in different years were determined using the TOPSIS method for ranking and the RSR method for grading. Firstly, in terms of TCM characteristic indicators, hospital H had the highest control of medical costs and comprehensive management among different hospitals, with 45.87% and 24.20% respectively. The highest values for control of medical costs and comprehensive management were observed in 2020, with 40.65% and 18.69% respectively among different years. When evaluating the medical quality of different hospitals using the TOPSIS method, it was found that hospital H had the highest ranking from 2020 to 2022, with Ci values of 0.725, 0.778, and 0.667 respectively. Additionally, the RSR method indicated that hospital H had a high level of grading from 2020 to 2022, with Pi values of 0.687, 0.690, and 0.723 respectively. These findings suggest that the medical quality of hospital H is at a high and stable level of development. Based on the TOPSIS method to evaluate the performance appraisal results and ranking of different hospitals from 2019 to 2022. The results showed that the highest ranking was hospital B(Ci = 0.913) in 2019. The highest ranking was hospital C(Ci = 0.809)in 2020. The highest ranking was hospital D(Ci = 0.689) in 2021. The highest ranking was hospital J(Ci = 0.865) in 2022. The RSR method indicated that high grading level were hospitals B(Pi = 0.899),F(Pi = 0.795) in 2019. The highest grading level was hospital C(Pi = 0.809) in 2020. The highest grading level were hospitals A(Pi = 0.868), D(Pi = 0.813), E(Pi = 0.689), G(Pi = 0.873), J(Pi = 0.813), K(Pi = 0.842) in 2022. Based on the above results indicate that there is a large variation in the medical quality profile of different hospitals from 2019 to 2022. By comparing the results of TOPSIS and RSR method from 2019 to 2022, we found that the hospitals with identical ranking were D and J, and the hospitals with ≤2 difference in ranking was A,B,C,E in 2019, the hospitals with >2 ranking was A, F in 2020, the hospitals with >2 ranking were C, G in 2021, and the hospitals with identical ranking results were B,D,E,G,J in 2022. Comparing the ranking results of TOPSIS and RSR methods, showed that the hospitals with identical rankings were B, F from 2019 to 2022. The difference in ranking results ≤2 were A, C, D, E, G, H, J, K, indicating that high consistency between TOPSIS and RSR methods and credible results. The findings reveal significant fluctuations in medical quality across different years, while the overall level of medical quality remains relatively stable among the various hospitals. It is recommended that TCM hospitals focus on improving management efficiency, optimizing hospital operations, enhancing the utilization of medical resources, and fostering the efficient development of hospitals.

Atenção primária e informação em saúde: desempenho e financiamento no município de Natal/rn / Primary Care and Health Information: Performace and finance in the municipality Natal/RN / Atención Primaria e Información en Salud: Desempenõ y financiamiento en elmunicipio de Natal/RN

Introdução: O país adotou, com a criação do Programa Previne Brasil, uma nova forma de financiamento da Atenção Primária à Saúde, com a portaria ministerial 2.979/2019, a qual estabeleceu critérios para alocação de recursos, com foco para o desempenho e produtividade da Atenção Primária. Talmodelo vem sendo alvo de críticas pelo campo acadêmico da Saúde Coletiva e por gestões municipais, que em diferentes situações demonstram perdas financeiras, sobretudo, devido ao componente de capitação ponderada. Objetivo: Sistematizar o desempenho da Atenção Primária à Saúde do município de Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, com base em indicadores de desempenho do Sistema de Informação em Saúde para a Atenção Básica, e o financiamento da Atenção Primária, com base no Sistema de Informações sobre Orçamentos Públicos em Saúde, entre os anos 2019 a 2022. Metodologia: Trata-se de uma pesquisa descritiva-exploratória, com utilização de dados secundários e sistematização dos sete indicadores de desempenho da Atenção Primária e análise das despesas com saúdedo município de Natal. Resultados:Dos sete indicadores analisados, o município de Natal alcançou a meta em dois indicadores, referente à proporção de gestantes com pelo menos seis consultas pré-natal realizadas (46% em 2022) e com realização de exames para sífilis e HIV (67% em 2022). O município destinou à Atenção Primária, em 2022, apenas 6,33% de todas suas despesas com saúde. Destaca-se, também, que a cobertura da Atenção Primária no município é de 60%, havendo ainda um vazio assistencial para grande parte da população natalense. Conclusões:A análise de indicadores de saúde, torna-se importante ferramenta para a ação avaliativa do Sistema Único de Saúde, bem como dá suporte para a tomada de decisão por parte de gestores e equipes de saúde, além de produzir conhecimento crítico para a qualificação da Atenção Primária à Saúde (AU).

Introduction:The country adopted, with the creation of the Previne Brasil Program, a new form of financing Primary Health Care, with ministerial decree 2.979/2019, which established criteria for resource allocation, focusing on the performance and productivity of Primary Care. This model has been criticized by the academic field of Public Health and by municipal administrations, which in different situations demonstrate financial losses, mainly due to the weighted capitation component. Objective:Systematize the performance of Primary Health Care in the city of Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, based on performance indicators from the Health Information System for Primary Care, and the financing of Primary Care, based on the Information System of Public Health Budgets, between the years 2019 and 2022. Methodology:This is descriptive-exploratory research, using secondary data and systematization of the seven Primary Care performance indicators and analysis of health expenses in the city of Natal. Results: Of the seven indicators analyzed, the municipality of Natal reached the target in two indicators, referring to the proportion of pregnant women with at least six prenatal consultations carried out (46% in 2022) and with tests for syphilis and HIV (67% in 2022). In 2022, the municipality allocated only 6.33% of all its health expenses to PrimaryCare. It is also noteworthy that Primary Care coverage in the municipality is 60%, with there still being a care gap for a large part of the population of Natal. Conclusions:The analysis of health indicators becomes an important tool for the evaluative action of the Unified Health System, as well as providing support for decision-making by managers and health teams, in addition to producing critical knowledge for the qualification of Primary Health Care (AU).

Introducción: El país adoptó, con la creación del Previne Brasil, una nueva forma de financiamiento de la Atención Primaria de Salud, con el decreto ministerial 2.979/2019, que estableció criterios para la asignación de recursos, con foco en el desempeño y productividad de la Atención Primaria. Este modelo ha sido criticado por el ámbito académico de la Salud Pública y por las administraciones municipales, que en diferentes situaciones demuestran pérdidas financieras, principalmente por el componente de capitación ponderada. Objetivo: Sistematizar el desempeño de la Atención Primaria de Salud en la ciudad de Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, con base en indicadores de desempeño del Sistema de Información en Salud para la Atención Primaria, y el su financiamiento, con base en el Sistema de Información Presupuestaria Pública en Salud, entre los años 2019 y 2022. Metodología: Se trata de una investigación descriptiva-exploratoria, utilizando datos secundarios y sistematización de siete indicadores de desempeño de la Atención Básica y análisis del gasto en salud. Resultados: De los siete indicadores analizados, el municipio de Natal alcanzó la meta en dos indicadores, referidos a la proporción de gestantes con al menos seis consultas prenatales realizadas (46% en 2022) y con pruebas de sífilis y HIV (67% en 2022). En 2022, el municipio destinó sólo el 6,33% de todos sus gastos sanitarios a la Atención Primaria. También se destaca que la cobertura de Atención Primaria en el municipio es del 60%, existiendo aún brecha de atención para gran parte de la población. Conclusiones: El análisis de indicadores de salud se convierte en herramienta importante para la acción de evaluación del Sistema Único de Salud, además de brindar apoyo para la toma de decisiones de gestores y equipos de salud, además de producir conocimiento crítico para la calificación de la Atención Primaria de Salud (AU).

Towards improving stroke services in Africa: Results from the Africa-UK Stroke Partnership [AUKSP] surveys.

BACKGROUND: The African Stroke Organization (ASO) in partnership with the University of Central Lancashire's Stroke Research Team launched the Africa-UK Stroke Partnership (AUKSP). AUKSP undertook two (stroke expert and hospital Stroke Unit (SU)) on-line surveys mapping existing capacity and capability to deliver African stroke care. METHODS: An on-line expert survey tool was sent to 139 stroke experts in 54 African countries October 2021-March 2022 and the hospital SU survey to 120 hospital SUs (identified from the expert survey) June-October 2022. Both survey tools were prepared according to the World Stroke Organisation's Roadmap for Delivering Quality Stroke Care. Completed responses were exported from Qualtrics into Microsoft excel and were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: Forty-five expert responses and 62 hospital SU responses were analysed, representing 54(87%) public hospitals, 7(11%) private and 1(2%) charitable organization. In both surveys, three main priorities for improvement of stroke services were: a rapid and prompt stroke diagnosis; effective primary and secondary stroke prevention, and acute stroke management. Survey findings suggest that there is a low presence of national stroke surveillance systems and registries, and heterogeneity in availability of diagnostic services, SUs, endovascular treatments, and rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Significant gaps exist in Africa's capacity and capability to deliver essential elements of effective and quality stroke care. Tackling these challenges requires urgent and sustained multi-stakeholder action including: government, administrators, policy makers and other partners. Our survey findings highlight key priority areas for multi-stakeholder engagement and crafting of a pragmatic, prioritized and context-sensitive African Stroke Action Plan.

Quality assurance using quality indicators for prevention and early detection of cervical cancer in certified gynaecological dysplasia units and consultancies.

PURPOSE: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. A successful screening concept for cervical cancer reduces the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer. Quality indicators (QIs) derived from the screening guidelines for cervical cancer and used by the certified dysplasia units and dysplasia consultancies are evaluated in this paper. The aim of this paper is to present the current data from the annual reports of these units and consultancies. METHODS: The results of the basic data and indicators for the audit year 2022 in the gynaecological dysplasia consultancies and units are presented. In 2022, 84 dysplasia consultancies and 42 units were audited. 40 units and 84 consultancies are included in the annual report. QI outcomes for patients treated in certified dysplasia units and dysplasia consultancies are analysed. Median, overall proportion, and standard deviation were calculated for each QI. RESULTS: The indicator year 2021 was analysed, which was audited in 2022 and evaluated in 2023. A total of nine QIs were analysed. Most target goals were met by the 84 certified dysplasia consultancies and by the 40 dysplasia units. The QIs evaluated are implemented to a very high degree. The targets for the three QIs were achieved by both the dysplasia consultancies and the units in at least 95% of the certified centres (QI 1: 100%, QI 2: 95%, QI 3: 100%; QI 1: 100%, QI 2: 97%, QI 3: 100%, respectively). The presentation of patients to the tumour board by the consultancies/units is working; the units are attending the tumour board more regularly than in previous years. Where the target was not met, the auditors issued deviations or reduced the duration of the certificate. The cases are discussed intensively in the sense of an individual case analysis and with the determination of measures on-site. CONCLUSIONS: The targets for the various indicators were largely met by the dysplasia consultancies and units in the 2022 audit year. The certification of gynaecological dysplasia consultancies/units which have to cooperate with certified gynaecological cancer centres, has for the first time ensured the continuity of healthcare from prevention and early diagnosis to treatment of gynaecological cancers.

Development of person-centred quality indicators for aged care assessment services in Australia: A mixed methods study.

INTRODUCTION: This study developed a proposed set of person-centred quality indicators (PC-QIs) for services that assess older adults' care and support needs to determine their eligibility to receive government-funded aged care services in Australia. Individual proposed PC-QIs amenability for change within current organizational structures were explored. Barriers and opportunities to adapt service elements of the aged care assessment service to better align with the intent of the proposed PC-QIs were identified. METHODS: A mixed methods study was conducted over five phases. A scoping review identified domains of quality for aged care services as perceived by older adults. Service elements of an aged care assessment service were mapped alongside quality domains informing key attributes of each quality domain. Self-determination theory was used to formulate each proposed PC-QI to align with key attributes and quality domains. Consultation with a consumer group enabled revision of the proposed PC-QIs. A focus group with clinicians evaluated the amenability of each proposed PC-QI for change and identified barriers and opportunities to better align service elements with older adults' perceptions of quality. Results were informed by qualitative and quantitative data from a structured focus group. Focus group discussions were audio recorded and subsequently transcribed verbatim. Qualitative data were analyzed using a deductive thematic approach by two independent researchers. RESULTS: Twenty-four proposed PC-QIs were developed. Refinement to descriptors of the proposed PC-QIs were made by the consumer group (n = 18) and all were affirmed as being amenable to change by aged care assessors. Barriers in meeting the intent of the proposed PC-QIs were identified across five domains including: health care staff knowledge (18.7%; n = 3); clear communication (31%; n = 5); person-centred approach (18.7%; n = 3); respect for client (18.7%; n = 3); and collaborative partnership with client (12%; n = 2). Participants made 21 recommendations. Of the five service elements in delivering an aged care assessment service, barriers in meeting the intent of the proposed PC-QIs were identified at the intake and booking of an assessment and during the assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations identified provide assessment services guidance on ways to adapt service elements to better align with older adults' perceptions of quality. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients and carers were involved as collaborators in this project at the protocol stage which included participating in discussions regarding the refining and modification of the protocol, refinement of the proposed PC-QIs, data collection forms and supplementary information for participants.

Defining the quality of interdisciplinary care for patients with brain metastases: modified Delphi panel recommendations.

The value of interdisciplinary teams in improving outcomes and quality of care of patients with brain metastases remains uncertain, partly due to the lack of consensus on key indicators to evaluate interprofessional care. We aimed to obtain expert consensus across disciplines on indicators that evaluate the quality and value of brain metastases care. A steering committee of key opinion leaders curated relevant outcomes and process indicators from a literature review and a stakeholder needs assessment, and an international panel of physicians rated the outcomes and process indicators using a modified Delphi method. After three rounds, a consensus was reached on 29 indicators encompassing brain-directed oncological treatment, surgery, whole-brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, supportive or palliative care, and interdisciplinary team care. The Brain Metastases Quality-of-Care measure reflects the value and quality of brain metastases team-based care according to treatment modality and provides a benchmark of care for this under-studied patient population. The adoption, implementation, and sustainability of this set of indicators could help address the need expressed by patients with cancer, caregivers, and clinicians for more coordinated care across inpatient, outpatient, home, community, and tertiary academic settings.

Intensive Care Quality Indicators Dashboard Using Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model.

This paper presents the development of a visualization dashboard for quality indicators in intensive care units (ICUs), using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM). The dashboard enables the user to visualize quality indicator data using histograms, pie charts and tables. Our project uses the OMOP CDM, ensuring a seamless implementation of our dashboard across various hospitals. Future directions for our research include expanding the dashboard to incorporate additional quality indicators and evaluating clinicians' feedback on its effectiveness.

Feasibility of Calculating Indicators for Intensive Care Unit Antibiotic Use Based on Routine Electronic Health Record Data.

This study evaluated the feasibility of utilizing routinely collected EHR data to calculate pre-developed quality indicators on antibiotic use. Three out of four indicators were found feasible. Main barriers included local codes for lab tests and surveillance cultures and lack of data on empirical prescription. Future studies should include data from multiple ICUs to test the variations in QIs between ICUs.

Towards Efficient Value-Based Healthcare Measurement Across Hospital Care Pathways - A Scoping Review.

Hospitals widely employ value-based healthcare (VBHC) to effectively manage healthcare quality. VBHC aims to maximize patient outcomes while minimizing costs by using quality measurements. The Dutch Erasmus Medical Centre experiences challenges with the time-consuming efforts to collect, evaluate, and present value-based quality measurements. Using similar VBHC measurement indicators across multiple care pathways could reduce these efforts. This study aims to identify such generic indicators for evaluating and monitoring VBHC across care pathways. A scoping review resulted in 33 articles from which indicators for VBHC measurement were extracted, aggregated and categorized using Donabedian's Structure-Process-Outcome model. The results of this study can inform researchers and VBHC practitioners on generic quality measurement indicators for VBHC management and guide future system development to facilitate the inclusion of standardized quality indicators in healthcare information systems.