In patients with NSTE-ACS and previous CABG, routine invasive vs. conservative management does not improve outcomes.

SOURCE CITATION: Kelham M, Vyas R, Ramaseshan R, et al. Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes with previous coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of invasive vs. conservative management. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:2380-2391. 38805681.

Three-year outcomes following non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation, stratified by patient age (under and over 75 years) and left ventricular ejection fraction: A prospective cohort study.

Due to limited published data, we investigated 3-year outcomes according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients older and younger than 75 years with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who underwent successful newer-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. This research analyzed the data of 4558 patients (1032 older adults [≥75 years] and 3526 younger adults [<75 years]) from the Korea Acute MI Registry-NIH. We further divided the older group based on LVEF: heart failure (HF) with reduced EF (HFrEF, ≤40%, n = 196; group A), HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF, 41-49%, n = 228; group B), and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF, ≥50%, n = 608; group C). Similarly, the younger group was divided into HFrEF (group D, n = 353), HFmrEF (group E, n = 577), and HFpEF (group F, n = 2596). The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 3 years, including all-cause death, recurrent MI, any repeat revascularization, or hospitalization for HF. MACE rates were highest in the HFrEF groups (A and D), followed by the HFmrEF groups (B and E), and lowest in the HFpEF groups (C and F) for both age groups. All-cause death, cardiac death (CD), all-cause death or MI, and hospitalization for HF rates were higher in group A than in groups B and C, and higher in group D than in groups E and F. Across all LVEF categories, MACE, all-cause death, CD, and non-CD, and all-cause death or MI rates were higher in the older group. This multicenter cohort study demonstrates that older patients have higher mortality rates compared to younger patients. Additionally, MACE rates were highest in the HFrEF group, followed by the HFmrEF group, and lowest in the HFpEF group across both age groups. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.

[Short-term and long-term mortality comparison between myocardial infarction with and without ST segment elevation undergoing myocardial revascularization by percutaneous coronary angioplasty]. / Comparación de mortalidad a corto y largo plazo entre el infarto del miocardio con y sin supradesnivel del segmento ST sometido a revascularización miocárdica por angioplastia coronaria percutánea.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the early and late mortality of patients that have suffered an ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and a non-ST segment elevated myocardialinfarction (NSTEMI). METHODS: Retrospective study of patients treated at the Regional Clinical Hospital of Concepción from January the 1rst 2013 to December 31 rst 2015, with diagnostic of STEMI and NSTEMI that required coronary angioplasty during their hospitalization. Descriptive and multivariate analysis was performed to compare mortality rates between both populations before 30 days and in follow-up at 4 years. RESULTS: 1838 patients were included with an average follow-up of 82 months. The population with STEMI was 921 and was younger, with a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension and smoking. The population with NSTEMI had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, a lower glomerular filtration rate, and a higher incidence of left main coronary artery disease and chronic occlusions. At the end of follow-up, the overall survival rate was 76%, with no significant difference between the two groups. Patients with STEMI had twice the risk of dying in the first 30 days (Long Rank: 0.012). After 30 days, mortality was higher in the NSTEMI group (80.8% vs 75.6%). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show significant differences in overall mortality during prolonged follow-up of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. The STEMI group had a higher risk of early death, while the NSTEMI group had higher long-term mortality.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram Model for Predicting in-Hospital Mortality in non-Diabetic Patients with non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is a life-threatening clinical emergency with a poor prognosis. However, there are no individualized nomogram models to identify patients at high risk of NSTEMI who may undergo death. The aim of this study was to develop a nomogram for in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI to facilitate rapid risk stratification of patients. A total of 774 non-diabetic patients with NSTEMI were included in this study. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression was used to initially screen potential predictors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression (backward stepwise selection) analyses were performed to identify the optimal predictors for the prediction model. The corresponding nomogram was constructed based on those predictors. The receiver operating characteristic curve, GiViTI calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. The nomogram model consisting of six predictors: age (OR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.05-1.15), blood urea nitrogen (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.00-1.12), albumin (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87-1.00), triglyceride (OR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.09-2.00), D-dimer (OR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.06-1.80), and aspirin (OR = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.06-0.42). The nomogram had good discrimination (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94), calibration, and clinical usefulness. In this study, we developed a nomogram model to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI based on common clinical indicators. The proposed nomogram has good performance, allowing rapid risk stratification of patients with NSTEMI.

Combined risk estimates of diabetes and coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) increase the risk of adverse cardiac events in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). This study aimed to evaluate the combined risk estimates of DM and CMD, assessed by the angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (angio-IMR), in patients with NSTEMI. METHODS: A total of 2212 patients with NSTEMI who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were retrospectively enrolled from three centers. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death or readmission for heart failure at a 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Post-PCI angio-IMR did not significantly differ between the DM group and the non-DM group (20.13 [17.91-22.70] vs. 20.19 [18.14-22.77], P = 0.530). DM patients exhibited a notably higher risk of cardiac death or readmission for heart failure at 2 years compared to non-DM patients (9.5% vs. 5.4%, P < 0.001). NSTEMI patients with both DM and CMD experienced the highest cumulative incidence of cardiac death or readmission for heart failure at 2 years (24.0%, P < 0.001). The combination of DM and CMD in NSTEMI patients were identified as the most powerful independent predictor for cardiac death or readmission for heart failure at 2 years (adjusted HR: 7.894, [95% CI, 4.251-14.659], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NSTEMI, the combination of DM and CMD is an independent predictor of cardiac death or readmission for heart failure. Angio-IMR could be used as an additional evaluation tool for the management of NSTEMI patients with DM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; Unique identifier: NCT05696379.

Presentation, care, coronary intervention and outcomes of patients with NSTEMI according to age: insights from the international prospective ACVC-EAPCI EORP NSTEMI registry.

BACKGROUND: Older people less frequently receive invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for NSTEMI than younger patients. We describe care, ICA data, and in-hospital and 30-day outcomes of NSTEMI by age in a contemporary and geographically diverse cohort. METHODS: Prospective cohort study including 2947 patients with NSTEMI from 287 centres in 59 countries, stratified by age (≥75 years, n = 761). Quality of care was evaluated based on 12 guideline-recommended care interventions, and data collected on ICA. Outcomes included in hospital acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, repeat myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, BARC Type ≥3 bleeding and death, as well as 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Patients aged ≥75 years, compared with younger patients, at presentation had a higher prevalence of comorbidities and oral anticoagulation prescription (22.4% vs 7.6%, p < 0.001). Older patients less frequently received ICA than younger patients (78.6% vs 90.6%, p < 0.001) with the recorded reason more often being advanced age, comorbidities or frailty. Of those who underwent ICA, older patients more frequently demonstrated 3-vessel, 4-vessel and/or left main stem coronary artery disease compared to younger patients (49.7% vs 34.1%, p < 0.001) but less frequently received revascularisation (63.6% vs 76.9%, p < 0.001). Older patients experienced higher rates of in-hospital acute heart failure (15.0% vs 8.4%, p < 0.001) and bleeding (2.8% vs 1.3%, p = 0.006), as well as in-hospital and 30-day mortality (3.4% vs 1.3%, p < 0.001; 4.8% vs 1.7%, p < 0.001; respectively), than younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients aged ≥75 years with NSTEMI, compared with younger patients, less frequently received ICA and guideline-recommended care, and had worse short-term outcomes.

Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on the Processes of Care and Long-Term Mortality of Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Cohort Study and Long-Term Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: A growing population of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) presents with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, although little is known about their longer-term mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the MINAP (Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project) registry, linked to Office for National Statistics mortality data, we analyzed 363 559 UK patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, with or without CKD. Cox regression models were fitted, adjusting for baseline demographics. Compared with patients without CKD, patients with CKD were less frequently prescribed P2Y12 inhibitors (89% versus 86%, P<0.001) less likely to undergo invasive angiography (67% versus 41%, P<0.001) or percutaneous coronary intervention (41% versus 25%, P<0.001), and were less often referred to cardiac rehabilitation (80% versus 66%, P<0.001). Following non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, patients with CKD had higher risk of 30-day (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.24 [95% CI, 1.20-1.29], 1-year 1.47 [95% CI, 1.44-1.51]) and 5-year mortality 1.55 (95% CI, 1.53-1.58) than patients without CKD (all P<0.001). Risk of mortality over the entire study period was highest in CKD Stage 5 (HR, 2.98 [95% CI, 2.87-3.10]), even after excluding mortality ≤30 days (HR, 3.03 [95% CI, 2.90-3.17]) (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in proportion of deaths attributable to cardiovascular disease at 30 days (CKD; 76% versus no CKD; 76%), or 1 -year (CKD; 62% versus no CKD; 62%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CKD were significantly less likely to receive invasive investigation or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention and had significantly higher risk of short- and longer-term mortality. Risk of mortality increased with reducing CKD stage. Cardiovascular disease was the main cause of mortality in patients with CKD, but at comparable rates to the general population with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.

An observational study of therapeutic procedures and in-hospital outcomes among patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction in Spain, 2016-2022: the role of diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: We used the Spanish national hospital discharge data from 2016 to 2022 to analyze procedures and hospital outcomes among patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) according to diabetes mellitus (DM) status (non-diabetic, type 1-DM or type 2-DM). METHODS: We built logistic regression models for STEMI/NSTEMI stratified by DM status to identify variables associated with in-hospital mortality (IHM). We analyzed the effect of DM on IHM. RESULTS: Spanish hospitals reported 201,950 STEMIs (72.7% non-diabetic, 0.5% type 1-DM, and 26.8% type 2-DM; 26.3% female) and 167,285 NSTEMIs (61.6% non-diabetic, 0.6% type 1-DM, and 37.8% type 2-DM; 30.9% female). In STEMI, the frequency of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) increased among non-diabetic people (60.4% vs. 68.6%; p < 0.001) and people with type 2-DM (53.6% vs. 66.1%; p < 0.001). In NSTEMI, the frequency of PCI increased among non-diabetic people (43.7% vs. 45.7%; p < 0.001) and people with type 2-DM (39.1% vs. 42.8%; p < 0.001). In NSTEMI, the frequency of coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) increased among non-diabetic people (2.8% vs. 3.5%; p < 0.001) and people with type 2-DM (3.7% vs. 5.0%; p < 0.001). In the entire population, lower IHM was associated with undergoing PCI (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval] = 0.34 [0.32-0.35] in STEMI; 0.24 [0.23-0.26] in NSTEMI) or CABG (0.33 [0.27-0.40] in STEMI; 0.45 [0.38-0.53] in NSTEMI). IHM decreased over time in STEMI (OR = 0.86 [0.80-0.93]). Type 2-DM was associated with higher IHM in STEMI (OR = 1.06 [1.01-1.11]). CONCLUSIONS: PCI and CABG were associated with lower IHM in people admitted for STEMI/NSTEMI. Type 2-DM was associated with IHM in STEMI.

Inpatient outcomes of NSTEMI among patients with immune thrombocytopenia: a propensity matched national study.

Patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) admitted for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) present a unique therapeutic challenge due to the increased risk of bleeding with antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapies. There is limited evidence studying hospital mortality and complications in this population. The study included a patient cohort from the 2018-2021 National Inpatient Sample database. Propensity score matched NSTEMI patients with and without ITP using a 1:1 matching ratio. Outcomes analyzed were in-hospital mortality, rates of diagnostic angiogram, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), acute kidney injury (AKI), congestive heart failure (CHF), cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, mechanical ventilation, tracheal intubation, ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), major bleeding, need for blood and platelet transfusion, length of stay (LOS), and total hospitalization charges. A total of 1,699,020 patients met inclusion criteria (660,490 females [39%], predominantly Caucasian 1,198,415 (70.5%); mean [SD] age 67, [3.1], including 2,615 (0.1%) patients with ITP. Following the propensity matching, 1,020 NSTEMI patients with and without ITP were matched. ITP patients had higher rates of inpatient mortality (aOR 1.98, 95% CI 1.11-3.50, p 0.02), cardiogenic shock, AKI, mechanical ventilation, tracheal intubation, red blood cells and platelet transfusions, longer LOS, and higher total hospitalization charges. The rates of diagnostic angiogram, PCI, CHF, VT, VF, and major bleeding were not different between the two groups. Patients with ITP demonstrated higher odds of in-hospital mortality for NSTEMI and need for platelet transfusion with no difference in rates of diagnostic angiogram or PCI.

Predictive Value of D-Dimer for In-Hospital Mortality in Non-Diabetic Patients with Non-ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Elevated circulating D-dimer levels have been shown to be a predictor of in-hospital mortality in a variety of diseases; however, the relationship between D-dimer and the in-hospital prognosis of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains unclear. This retrospective study included 662 non-diabetic patients with NSTEMI. Independent risk factors were identified by multivariate analyses, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to compare the predictive value of D-dimer, albumin (ALB), and D-dimer to albumin ratio (DAR) for in-hospital death in NSTEMI. Logistic regression model with restricted cubic spline (RCS) was used to further explore the linear or nonlinear relationship between D-dimer and the risk of death. In-hospital mortality occurred in 38 (5.7%) patients. Multivariate analysis showed that D-dimer (per increase of 500 ng) was identified as an independent predictor for in-hospital mortality in non-diabetic patients with NSTEMI (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03-1.40, P = 0.036). D-dimer demonstrated good predictive performance for in-hospital mortality with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) value of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66-0.83), and there was no significant difference in the predictive ability of D-dimer, ALB (AUC = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.61-0.79) and DAR (AUC = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66-0.84). In addition, RCS analysis showed a linear relationship between D-dimer and the risk of in-hospital mortality (P for nonlinear = 0.747). D-dimer can be used as a simple, reliable and valuable biomarker for predicting in-hospital mortality in non-diabetic patients with NSTEMI and is linearly associated with the risk of death.

Ischemia-modified albumin: is it a promising marker in acute coronary syndrome?

BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a type of coronary heart disease (CHD), which is responsible for one-third of total deaths in people older than 35 years. Even though cardiac troponin is the gold standard for myocardial necrosis it is blind for ischemia without necrosis. Studies demonstrate that Ischaemia Modified Albumin (IMA) is more sensitive in diagnosing ischemic chest pain compared to cardiac troponin T and electrocardiogram, and its combination with these tests significantly increases the sensitivity for diagnosing unstable angina, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), or ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), with high positive and negative predictive values, making it a valuable tool for ruling out ACS in patients with inconclusive diagnoses in the emergency department. METHODS: This prospective cohort study, conducted at the Teaching Hospital, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, from 2015 to 2019, investigated ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) levels in 330 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Excluding those with various chronic conditions and those on specific medications, serum IMA was analyzed using a colorimetric assay based on cobalt (II) binding to human serum albumin affected by myocardial ischemia. Serum IMA levels were measured, and statistical analyses, including non-parametric tests and correlation analyses, were conducted to evaluate the association between IMA levels and various demographic and clinical factors. RESULTS: IMA concentrations were found to be non-normally distributed, with an average concentration of 0.252 ± 0.123 AU. No overall significant gender-based difference in IMA levels was observed, though within the younger age group (< 59 years), males exhibited higher IMA concentrations than females. Significant gender differences were observed in the younger age group, with males showing higher IMA levels than females (p = 0.033). No significant differences in IMA levels were found across different ethnicities (p = 0.217) or BMI categories (p = 0.056). A significant increase in IMA levels was noted in ACS patients compared to control subjects (p < 0.001). Correlation analysis revealed significant associations between IMA levels and total cholesterol (r = 0.262, p = 0.009) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels (r = 0.280, p = 0.006). Notably, a significant gender difference in IMA levels was found in obese patients, suggesting physiological differences in response to obesity. The study also revealed higher IMA concentrations in NSTEMI and STEMI patients compared to those with unstable angina. CONCLUSION: The study confirms elevated IMA levels in ACS patients, supporting its diagnostic potential. It reveals demographic influences, such as higher IMA levels in younger males and significant gender-specific differences in obese patients. Personalized approaches considering demographics and lipid management are essential for ACS risk reduction and IMA's role in management.

The association between HbA1c/C-peptide levels and short-term mortality in patients diagnosed with myocardial infarction.

Introduction: In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of HbA1C/C-peptide ratio on short-term mortality (this period is defined as 30 days after diagnosis) in the patients with myocardial infarction.Materials & Methods: Around 3245 patients who were admitted due to ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention between October 2020 and 2024 were included in this study.Results: In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the predictive power of the HCR score for mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients was determined to be 83% sensitivity and 81% specificity. In non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, this was determined to be 78% sensitivity and 75% specificity.Conclusion: The HbA1C/C-peptide ratio score can predict poor clinical outcomes early, reducing mortality and morbidity in patients with myocardial infarction.

[Box: see text].

Prognostic Value of Coronary Angiography-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.

BACKGROUND: The index of microcirculatory resistance is a reliable measure for evaluating coronary microvasculature, but its prognostic value in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of postpercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (angio-IMR) in patients with NSTEMI. METHODS: The culprit vessel's angio-IMR was measured after PCI in 2,212 NSTEMI patients at 3 sites. The primary endpoint was 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as a composite of cardiac death, readmission for heart failure, myocardial reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: The mean post-PCI angio-IMR was 20.63 ± 4.17 in NSTEMI patients. A total of 206 patients were categorized as the high post-PCI angio-IMR group according to maximally selected log-rank statistics. Patients with angio-IMR >25 showed a higher rate of MACEs than those with angio-IMR ≤25 (32.52% vs 9.37%; P < 0.001). Post-PCI angio-IMR >25 was an independent predictor of MACEs (HR: 4.230; 95% CI: 3.151-5.679; P < 0.001) and showed incremental prognostic value compared with conventional risk factors (AUC: 0.774 vs 0.716; P < 0.001; net reclassification index: 0.317; P < 0.001; integrated discrimination improvement: 0.075; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing PCI for NSTEMI, an increased post-PCI angio-IMR is associated with a higher risk of MACEs. The addition of post-PCI angio-IMR into conventional risk factors significantly improves the ability to reclassify patients and estimate the risk of MACEs. (Angiograph-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction; NCT05696379).

Optimal timing of revascularization for patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and severe left ventricular dysfunction.

Optimal timing of revascularization for patients who presented with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction is unclear. A total of 386 NSTEMI patients with severe LV dysfunction from the nationwide, multicenter, and prospective Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry V (KAMIR-V) were enrolled. Severe LV dysfunction was defined as LV ejection fraction ≤ 35%. Patients with cardiogenic shock were excluded. Patients were stratified into two groups: PCI within 24 hours (early invasive group) and PCI over 24 hours (selective invasive group). Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) including all-cause death, non-fatal MI, repeat revascularization, and stroke at 12 months after index procedure. Early invasive group showed higher incidence of in-hospital death (9.4% vs 3.3%, P = .036) and cardiogenic shock (11.5% vs 4.6%, P = .030) after PCI. Early invasive group also showed higher maximum troponin I level during admission (27.7 ±â€…44.8 ng/mL vs 14.9 ±â€…24.6 ng/mL, P = .001), compared with the selective invasive group. Early invasive group had an increased risk of 12-month MACCE, compared with selective invasive group (25.6% vs 17.1%; adjusted HR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.17-3.77, P = .006). Among NSTEMI patients with severe LV dysfunction, the early invasive strategy did not improve the clinical outcomes. This data supports that an individualized approach may benefit high-risk NSTEMI patients rather than a routine invasive approach.

Serum Concentrations of Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 and Procollagen Type I Carboxy Terminal Propeptide Discriminate Infarct-Like Myocarditis and Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers simplifying the diagnostic workup by discriminating between non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and infarct-like myocarditis are an unmet clinical need. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 105 subjects were categorized into groups as follows: ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (n=36), NSTEMI (n=22), infarct-like myocarditis (n=19), cardiomyopathy-like myocarditis (n=18), and healthy control (n=10). All subjects underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and serum concentrations of matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) and procollagen type I carboxy terminal propeptide (PICP) were measured. Biomarker concentrations in subjects presenting with acute coronary syndrome and non-ST-segment-elevation, for example NSTEMI or infarct-like myocarditis, categorized as the non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome-like cohort, were of particular interest for this study. Compared with healthy controls, subjects with myocarditis had higher serum concentrations of MMP-1 and PICP, while no difference was observed in individuals with myocardial infarction. In the non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome-like cohort, MMP-1 concentrations discriminated infarct-like myocarditis and NSTEMI with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.89-1.00), whereas high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T performed inferiorly (AUC, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.58-0.90]; P=0.012). Application of an optimal MMP-1 cutoff had 94.4% sensitivity (95% CI, 72.7%-99.9%) and 90.9% specificity (95% CI, 70.8%-98.9%) for the diagnosis of infarct-like myocarditis in this cohort. The AUC of PICP in this context was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.68-0.97). As assessed by likelihood ratio tests, incorporating MMP-1 or PICP with age and C-reactive protein into composite prediction models enhanced their diagnostic performance. CONCLUSIONS: MMP-1 and PICP could potentially be useful biomarkers for differentiating between NSTEMI and infarct-like myocarditis in individuals with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome-like presentation, though further research is needed to validate their clinical applicability.

[La « technique du buddy stent ¼ pour pallier un mauvais support lors de l'implantation d'un stent couvert dans le traitement d'une perforation coronaire]. / The "buddy stent technique" to overcome poor support for cover stent implantation to treat coronary perforation.

An 86-year-old woman was managed for a non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography revealed significant stenoses at the left anterior descending, left ostial circumflex (LCX), obtuse first marginal, and a Medina 1.0.1 bifurcation lesion at the middle LCX/ second obtuse marginal (OM2). During percutaneous coronary intervention, the rupture of the pre-dilatation balloon was complicated by a type III coronary perforation at the level of the LCX/OM2 bifurcation, leading to cardiac tamponade. Hemodynamics were stabilized by percutaneous pericardial drainage. The placement of a covered stent (BeGraft, Bentley InnoMed), to seal the coronary perforation, was not possible due to its great rigidity and the angulation towards the OM2, even with the use of a guiding catheter extension (Guidezilla, Boston Scientific). To further increase support, we decided to use the flexibility of a regular drug-eluting stent which we implanted from the LCX to the OM2, thereby creating a rail-like path in which the covered stent could then be positioned and deployed successfully, allowing the perforation to be sealed with a good final result. This is what we called the "buddy stent technique".