Performance of the cobas EBV and cobas BKV assays: multi-site comparison of standardized quantitation.

Guidelines recommend monitoring of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and BK virus (BKV) in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. The majority of quantitative DNA testing for EBV and BKV employs unstandardized individual laboratory-developed testing solutions (LDTs), with implications for accuracy, reproducibility, and comparability between laboratories. The performance of the cobas EBV and cobas BKV assays was assessed across five laboratories, using the World Health Organization International Standards (WHO IS) for EBV and BKV, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology Quantitative Standard for BKV, and results were compared with the LDTs in use at the time. Methods were also compared using locally sourced clinical specimens. Variation was high when laboratories reported EBV or BKV DNA values using LDTs, where quantitative values were observed to differ by up to 1.5 log10 unit/mL between sites. Conversely, results from the cobas EBV and cobas BKV assays were accurate and reproducible across sites and on different testing days. Adjustment of LDTs using the international standards led to closer alignment between the assays; however, day-to-day reproducibility of LDTs remained high. In addition, BKV continued to show bias, indicating challenges with the commutability of the BKV International Standard. The cobas EBV and cobas BKV assays are automated, aligned to the WHO IS, and have the potential to reduce the variability in viral load testing introduced by differences in LDTs. Standardization of reporting values may eventually allow different centers to compare data to allow clinical decision thresholds to be established supporting improvements in patient management.IMPORTANCEThe application of center-specific cut-offs for clinical decisions and the variability of LDTs often hinder interpretation; thus, the findings reported here support the need for standardization in the field of post-transplant monitoring of EBV and BKV to improve patient management. Alongside the choice of assay, it is also important to consider which standard to use when deciding upon a testing methodology. This is a call to action for standardization, as treatment for EBV and BKV is driven by viral load test results, and the more accurate and comparable the test results are across institutions, the more informed and better the treatment decisions can be.

Collapsing Glomerulopathy Leading To Rapidly Progressive Allograft Failure From Cytomegalovirus and SARS-CoV-2 Infection With Concomitant BK Virus Nephropathy.

We present a challenging clinical case of a 68-year-old female kidney transplant recipient who had a complicated posttransplant course marked by borderline T-cell-mediated rejection and BK virus nephropathy. The treatment for borderline rejection with steroids resulted in overimmunosuppression, and the patient acquired cytomegalovirus infection manifesting as colitis and SARS-CoV-2 infection. This progressed rapidly to collapsing glomerulopathy and allograft failure. This study also highlights the challenges in surveillance with donor-derived cell-free DNA in the setting of allograft injury by multiple viral infections.

BK Viremia and Viruria Does Not Depend on the Type of Double-J Stent Used During Kidney Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: BK virus is a major cause of chronic renal allograft failure.Transplant ureteral stent use has been reported as a risk factorfor BK virus infection. Recently, the use of a new type of ureteral stent (Magnetic Black Star) was reported in kidney transplant recipients. The aim ofthis preliminary report was to compare BK virus viremia and viruria occurrence depending on the type of double-J stent (standard versus Magnetic Black Star). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all kidney transplants performed in our center from January to December 2022. Each case had double-J stent placement. Indwelling stents were either a 6- or 7-Fr standard double-J stent or a 6-Fr Magnetic Black Star double-J stent. The type of double-J stent was chosen according to the surgeon's preference. A standard BK virus screening protocol was followed during the study period, which consisted of routine polymerase chain reaction examination of plasma and urine samples during monthly follow-ups. RESULTS: We assessed 120 patients without missing data: 92 patients received standard double-J stents and 28 patients received Magnetic Black Star stents. Patients were mostly male in the standard group (70.7%) versus the Magnetic Black Star group (42.9%) (P = .01). ABO- and HLA-incompatible transplant rates were similar in both groups. BK viremia occurrence and BK viruria occurrence were similar between groups at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study showed no differences concerning BKvirus infection depending on the type of double-J stents used during kidney transplant.

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation.

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Effect of steroid pulses in severe BK virus allograft nephropathy with extensive interstitial inflammation.

INTRODUCTION: As there is no specific antiviral treatment currently available for BK polyomavirus associated nephropathy (BKVAN), its management relies on immunosuppression reduction in kidney transplant patients. Data on efficacy of steroid pulses in this indication are lacking. METHODS: We performed a retrospective monocenter study on 64 patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven BKVAN. Patients within the "pulse group" (n = 37) received IV methylprednisolone 10 mg/kg 3 days consecutively. In the "low dose" steroid group (n = 27), patients were continued oral prednisone 5 mg daily. RESULTS: Mean follow up was 78 months in the steroid pulse group and 56 months in the low dose group (p = 0.15). Mean eGFR values at diagnosis were comparable, as well as other demographic characteristics. Mean BK plasma viral load was higher in "pulse" than in "low dose" steroid group. Pulse group had higher inflammation and tubulitis (p < 0.05). Graft loss reached 57% in the "pulse" group versus 41% in the "low dose" group, p = 0.20. Rejection events were similar. No major adverse event was statistically associated with steroid pulse, including infections, cancer, and de novo diabetes. CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found in the evolution of both groups of patients, despite patients receiving "pulse" steroids were identified as the most severe sharing higher BK viral load and more frequent active lesions on histology.

Concurrent JCPyV-DNAemia Is Correlated With Poor Graft Outcome in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Polyomavirus-associated Nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Co-infection of JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) and BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is uncommon in kidney transplant recipients, and the prognosis is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of concurrent JCPyV-DNAemia on graft outcomes in BKPyV-infected kidney transplant recipients with polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN). METHODS: A total of 140 kidney transplant recipients with BKPyV replication and PyVAN, 122 without concurrent JCPyV-DNAemia and 18 with JCPyV-DNAemia were included in the analysis. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to identify prognostic factors for graft survival. A nomogram for predicting graft survival was created and evaluated. RESULTS: The median tubulitis score in the JCPyV-DNAemia-positive group was higher than in JCPyV-DNAemia-negative group ( P  = 0.048). At last follow-up, the graft loss rate in the JCPyV-DNAemia-positive group was higher than in the JCPyV-DNAemia-negative group (50% versus 25.4%; P  = 0.031). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the graft survival rate in the JCPyV-DNAemia-positive group was lower than in the JCPyV-DNAemia-negative group ( P  = 0.003). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that concurrent JCPyV-DNAemia was an independent risk factor for graft survival (hazard ratio = 4.808; 95% confidence interval: 2.096-11.03; P  < 0.001). The nomogram displayed favorable discrimination (C-index = 0.839), concordance, and clinical applicability in predicting graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent JCPyV-DNAemia is associated with a worse graft outcome in BKPyV-infected kidney transplant recipients with PyVAN.

Cell-Free Mitochondrial DNA: An Upcoming Non-Invasive Tool for Diagnosis of BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy.

Mitochondria are essential organelles that possess their own DNA. Mitochondrial dysfunction has been revealed in many kidney diseases, including BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN). In this study, we introduce an innovative approach for non-invasive monitoring of mitochondrial impairment through urinary donor-derived cell-free mitochondrial DNA (ddcfmtDNA), addressing the crucial challenge of BKPyVAN diagnosis. Urinary samples were collected at the time of biopsy from a total of 60 kidney transplant recipients, comprising 12 with stable function, 22 with T cell-mediated rejection, and 21 with biopsy-proven BKPyVAN. Our findings reveal that the ddcfmtDNA-to-ddcfDNA ratio exhibits superior capability in distinguishing BKPyVAN from other conditions, with a cutoff value of 4.96% (area under curve = 0.933; sensitivity: 71.4%; and specificity: 97.1%). Notably, an elevation of ddcfmtDNA levels is associated with mitochondrial damage, as visualized through electron microscopy. These results underscore the promise of non-invasive monitoring for detecting subtle mitochondrial damage and its potential utility in BKPyVAN diagnosis. Further investigations are required to advance this field of research.

Performance evaluation of the high-throughput quantitative Alinity m BK virus assay.

BK virus (BKV) infection or reactivation in immunocompromised individuals can lead to adverse health consequences including BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) in kidney transplant patients and BKV-associated hemorrhagic cystitis (BKV-HC) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Monitoring BKV viral load plays an important role in post-transplant patient care. This study evaluates the performance of the Alinity m BKV Investigational Use Only (IUO) assay. The linearity of the Alinity m BKV IUO assay had a correlation coefficient of 1.000 and precision of SD ≤ 0.25 Log IU/mL for all panel members tested (2.0-7.3 Log IU/mL). Detection rate at 50 IU/mL was 100%. Clinical plasma specimens tested comparing Alinity m BKV IUO to ELITech MGB Alert BKV lab-developed test (LDT) on the Abbott m2000 platform using specimen extraction protocols for DNA or total nucleic acid (TNA) resulted in coefficient of correlation of 0.900 and 0.963, respectively, and mean bias of 0.03 and -0.54 Log IU/mL, respectively. Alinity m BKV IUO compared with Altona RealStar BKV and Roche cobas BKV assays demonstrated coefficient of correlation of 0.941 and 0.980, respectively, and mean bias of -0.47 and -0.31 Log IU/mL, respectively. Urine specimens tested on Alintiy m BKV IUO and ELITech BKV LDT using TNA specimen extraction had a coefficient of correlation of 0.917 and mean bias of 0.29 Log IU/mL. The Alinity m BKV IUO assay was performed with high precision across the dynamic range and correlated well with other available BKV assays. IMPORTANCE: BK virus (BKV) in transplant patients can lead to adverse health consequences. Viral load monitoring is important in post-transplant patient care. This study evaluates the Alinity m BKV assay with currently available assays.

The risk factors associated with post-transplantation BKPyV nephropathy and BKPyV DNAemia: a prospective study in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection after kidney transplantation can lead to serious complications such as BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) and graft loss. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of BKPyVAN after implementing a BKPyV screening program, to map the distribution of BKPyV genotypes and subtypes in the Uppsala-Örebro region and to identify host and viral risk factors for clinically significant events. METHODS: This single-center prospective cohort study included kidney transplant patients aged ≥ 18 years at the Uppsala University Hospital in Sweden between 2016 and 2018. BKPyV DNA was analyzed in plasma and urine every 3 months until 18 months after transplantation. Also genotype and subtype were determined. A logistic regression model was used to analyze selected risk factors including recipient sex and age, AB0 incompatibility and rejection treatment prior to BKPyVAN or high-level BKPyV DNAemia. RESULTS: In total, 205 patients were included. Of these, 151 (73.7%) followed the screening protocol with 6 plasma samples, while184 (89.8%) were sampled at least 5 times. Ten (4.9%) patients developed biopsy confirmed BKPyVAN and 33 (16.1%) patients met criteria for high-level BKPyV DNAemia. Male sex (OR 2.85, p = 0.025) and age (OR 1.03 per year, p = 0.020) were identified as significant risk factors for developing BKPyVAN or high-level BKPyV DNAemia. BKPyVAN was associated with increased viral load at 3 months post transplantation (82,000 vs. < 400 copies/mL; p = 0.0029) and with transient, high-level DNAemia (n = 7 (27%); p < 0.0001). The most common genotypes were subtype Ib2 (n = 50 (65.8%)) and IVc2 (n = 20 (26.3%)). CONCLUSIONS: Male sex and increasing age are related to an increased risk of BKPyVAN or high-level BKPyV DNAemia. BKPyVAN is associated with transient, high-level DNAemia but no differences related to viral genotype were detected.

Efficacy of mTOR Inhibitors and Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Treatment of Polyoma BK Nephropathy in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Biopsy-Proven Study.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the efficacy of a predetermined protocol that consisted of immunosuppressive drug reduction/withdrawal and intravenous immunoglobulin administration for the treatment of polyoma BK virus nephropathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven polyoma BK virus nephropathy received a treatment regimen based on discontinuation of both calcineurin inhibitors and antiproliferative agents and switching to mTOR inhibitors accompanied by intravenous immunoglobulin administration. RESULTS: Our study included 508 patients, with polyoma BK viremia detected in 80 patients. The mean age was 45.3 ± 9.5 years (range, 18-71 y), 64% were male, and mean follow-up was 37 ± 21 months (6-94 mo). All 16 patients who developed polyoma BK virus nephropathy and 9 patients who had highgrade polyoma BK viremia without nephropathy received intravenous immunoglobulin treatment. Compared with patients with viremia, patients with polyoma BK virus nephropathy had significantly higher rates of graft loss due to rejection (18.8% vs 1.6%; P = .024) and all-cause graft loss (31.2% vs 6.3%; P = .014). Histopathologically, viral inclusion bodies disappeared and SV40 became negative after treatment in all 13 patients who underwent protocol biopsies. Unfortunately, histopathologically complete recovery without chronic tubular and interstitial tissue damage was achieved in only 4 patients after treatment. In addition, 3 patients lost their grafts due to acute antibody-mediated or mixed-type rejection (18.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with polyoma BK virus nephropathy, clearance of viremia and SV40 should not be the sole outcomes to obtain. Aggressive reductions in maintenance immunosuppression and switching to double-drug therapy combined with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin leads to high rates of graft loss/rejection and sequalae of chronic histological changes.

The diagnostic utility of Merkel cell polyoma virus immunohistochemistry in cytology specimens.

OBJECTIVE: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine neoplasm that predominantly affects elderly and immunocompromised patients. Merkel cell polyoma virus (MCPyV) is clonally integrated into the majority of MCCs and has been linked to patient outcomes, playing a central role in the pathogenesis of the disease. We aimed to assess the utility of MCPyV immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the diagnosis of MCC in cytology cell block specimens and correlating with clinicopathologic features. METHODS: Fifty-three cytology samples of MCC with sufficient cell block material were stained for MCPyV by IHC and scored semi-quantitatively in extent and intensity. Morphologic mimics of MCC including small cell lung carcinoma (n = 10), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 10), basaloid squamous cell carcinoma (n = 6) and other neuroendocrine carcinomas (n = 8) were stained in parallel. Positive staining was defined as >1% of the tumour cells showing at least moderate staining intensity. RESULTS: The cytologic features of MCC were characterized by high nuclear-cytoplasmic ratios, hyperchromatic nuclei with 'salt and pepper' chromatin, and nuclear moulding. MCPyV was detected in 24 of 53 cases (45%). Staining was strong and diffuse in roughly half of the positive samples. Of the morphologic mimics, one follicular lymphoma showed strong and diffuse staining. In contrast to prior studies, we saw no association between MCPyV status and patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: Merkel cell polyoma virus IHC is highly specific (97%) for the diagnosis of MCC in our cohort, and can serve as a useful diagnostic tool for distinguishing MCC for morphologic mimics.

Visual, rapid, and cost-effective BK virus detection system for renal transplanted patients using gold nanoparticle coupled loop-mediated isothermal amplification (nanoLAMP).

A substantial percentage of kidney transplant recipients show transplant failure due to BK virus-induced nephropathy. This can be clinically controlled by the rapid and timely detection of BK virus infection in immune-compromised patients. We report a rapid (two hours from sample collection, processing, and detection), cost-effective (< 2$), highly sensitive and BKV-specific nanoLAMP (loop-mediated isothermal amplification) diagnostic methodology using novel primers and gold nanoparticles complex-based visual detection. The standardized nanoLAMP showed an analytical sensitivity of 25 copies/µl and did not cross-react with closely related JC and SV40 viruses. This nanoLAMP showed diagnostic sensitivity and specificity as 91% and 96%, respectively, taking 50 BK virus-negative (confirmed by qPCR from the plasma of healthy donors) and 57 positive BKV patient samples (confirmed by clinical parameters and qPCR assay). This simple two-step, low-cost, and quick (1-2 h/test) detection would be advantageous over the currently used diagnostic methodology. It may change the paradigm for polyomavirus infection-based failure of renal transplant.

Treatment of BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy in Paediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients: Leflunomide Versus Cidofovir.

OBJECTIVES: BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy is a clinicopathological entity that negatively affects graft function in kidney transplant recipients. We compared the efficacy of leflunomide and cidofovir to treat BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of pediatric recipients with BK viremia for the period 2004 through 2019 were reviewed retrospectively, and patients diagnosed with BK polyomavirusassociated nephro-pathy were included in the study. A serum BK virus level above 104 copies/mL was accepted as BK viremia. We defined BK polyomavirusassociated nephropathy as detection of BK virus SV40 antigen on immunochemistry staining of renal graft tissue accompanied by signs of tubulointerstitial nephritis or elevated serum creatinine in addition to BK viremia. RESULTS: Of 304 kidney transplant recipients, 53 had persistent BK viremia; 36 of these patients (61.1% male) were included in the study with the diagnosis of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. Twelve patients (33.3%) received cidofovir, and 14 (38.8%) received leflunomide. Results were similar between the cidofovir and leflunomide groups for serum creatinine level at last follow-up (0.91 ± 0.29 vs 0.94 ± 0.37 mg/dL, respectively; P = .843) and graft failure rate (8.3% vs 14.2%, respectively; P = .632). Graft failure was observed in 8.3% of patients with BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. CONCLUSIONS: Leflunomide and cidofovir showed similar efficacy for treatment of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy.

Comparative Study of Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Leflunomide Combination Therapy With Intravenous Immunoglobulin Single Therapy in Kidney Transplant Patients With BK Virus Infection: Single-Center Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Nephropathy due to BK virus infection is a major cause of graft dysfunction and loss. No specific treatment has been developed for the BK virus. Here, we compared the combination of intravenous immunoglobulin and leflunomide versus intravenous immunoglobulin to treat BK virus nephropathy after renal transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled clinical trial. Sixteen kidney transplant patients with BK virus infection were randomly divided into 2 groups; 1 group received intravenous immunoglobulin, and another group received leflunomide and intravenous immunoglobulin. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Results of a polymerase chain reaction test for BK virus after 2 months of treatment were negative in 3 patients in the intravenous immunoglobulin group and in 7 patients in the intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide group. The amount of BK virus decreased significantly in each group, and a significant difference was observed between the 2 groups after 3 months (P = .014). The average level of creatinine in the intravenous immunoglobulin group at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment was 1.7 ± 0.23, 1.8 ± 0.5, and 1.5 ± 0.3, respectively, and in the intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide group was 2.1 ± 0.75, 1.76 ± 0.37, and 1.4 ± 0.18, respectively (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Although BK viral load decreased significantly in both groups, there was a significant difference between patients who received intravenous immunoglobulin versus those who received the combination of intravenous immunoglobulin + leflunomide after 3 months. The addition of leflunomide to the intravenous immunoglobulin treatment seems to have a better effect in reducing BK viral load. However, further studies with a larger sample and longer duration are needed.

Effect of Leflunomide on Treatment of Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients With BK Virus Infection.

OBJECTIVES: Infection with the BK virus is a significant complication after renal transplant and can progress to BK virus nephropathy and graft dysfunction. There is no consensus on the management of BK virus infection in pediatric renal transplant recipients. The most common therapeutic option is immunosuppression reduction, which can increase rejection risk. We aimed to examine the effect of leflunomide, an agent with antiviral and immunosuppressive actions, in a case series of pediatric renal transplant recipients with BK virus infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Routine screening with blood BK virus DNA polymerase chain reaction was performed regularly in all of our renal transplant patients. When BK virus was detected, we reduced tacrolimus levels, discontinued mycophenolate mofetil, and started active treatment with leflunomide. Treatment with leflunomide was continued until BK virus was undetectable by polymerase chain reaction in at least 2 blood samples 2 weeks apart. RESULTS: All pediatric patients developed BK virus infection in a mean period of 3.9 months after transplant. Graft dysfunction was evident in all patients with 20% to 100% elevation of creatinine from baseline. Afterleflunomide initiation, all patients had undetectable levels of BK virus by plasma polymerase chain reaction in at least 2 different samples within a mean period of 3.4 months, and renal function had normalized back to the baseline. None of our patients had evidence of hepatotoxicity or anemia on regular monitoring, with no other adverse events. Renal function remained stable in the follow-up period with no reoccurrence of BK viremia up to the date of this writing. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with leflunomide resulted in rapid BK virus clearance and preservation of renal function with no adverse effects.

A review of Merkel cell carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive type of metastatic, nonmelanoma skin cancer derived from Merkel cells in the epidermis. MCC can be induced by sun exposure or via Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCV) gene expression. MCV is found in most patients with MCC and is associated with a lower recurrence rate of MCC. MCC has a wide range of clinical presentations that make diagnosis challenging. Histologic examination is performed using unique markers to differentiate it from other diagnoses. This article reviews the pathogenesis, clinical presentation, histopathology, differential diagnosis, and treatment of MCC.

Predictive Factors of BK Virus Development in Kidney Transplant Recipients and the Effect of Low-Dose Tacrolimus Plus Everolimus on Clinical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the predictive factors of BK virus viremia/nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients and to evaluate the effects of low-dose tacrolimus plus everolimus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 3654 kidney transplant recipients. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 were BK virus negative (n = 3525, 96.5%) and group 2 were BK virus positive (n = 129, viremia 3.5%, nephropathy 1%). Predictive factors were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and logistic regression models.We also divided and analyzed patients with BK virus viremia/nephropathy into 2 groups according to immunosuppressive changes. Group 2a had been switched to low-dose tacrolimus plus everolimus (n = 54, 41.9%), and group 2b had been switched to other immunosuppressive protocols (n = 75, 58.1%). RESULTS: We found that use of anti-T-cell lymphocyte globulin and tacrolimus, deceased donor transplant, and rejection were predictive factors for BK virus viremia/nephropathy. In addition, patients who had low-dose calcineurin inhibitor plus mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor regimens showed a low rate of BK virus development(only 6.2% of all cases). In Group 2a, both the BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy rate (n = 23 [42.6%] vs n = 12 [16%] in group 2b; P = .001) and viral load (DNA > 104 copies/mL) (n = 49 [90.7%] vs n = 27 [36%] in group 2b; P = .001) were increased versus group 2b. Graft function, graft survival, viral clearance, and rejection rate were similar between the groups after protocol change. CONCLUSIONS: BK virus viremia/nephropathy rate was lower in patients who received low-dose calcineurin inhibitor plus mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor protocols; the low-dose tacrolimus plus everolimus switch protocol after BK virus was more effective and safe than other protocols.

The Relationship between Acute Rejection, Hemoglobin Level, and BK Virus Infection Among Renal Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the risk factors for BK virus (BKV) infection in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) routinely treated with tacrolimus. METHODS: Forty-two cases with BKV infections and 51 patients without BKV infections were enrolled in the study. Eighty-seven healthy individuals and 77 patients undergoing dialysis were randomly included as controls. A logistic regression model was used to analyze potential variables in order to evaluate factors related to BKV infection in the renal transplant recipients. RESULTS: The number of individuals with acute rejection in BKV positive RTRs is significantly higher than that in BKV negative RTRs. Hemoglobin levels in BKV positive RTRs were significantly lower than those in BKV negative RTRs (109.61 ± 20.11 vs. 130.16 ± 26.297, p < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between tacrolimus levels and hemoglobin concentration in RTRs (r = 0.329, p = 0.023). The results of a multivariate regression analysis indicated that a history of acute rejection (OR = 4.157, p = 0.031) and low hemoglobin (OR = 0.963, p < 0.001) were risk factors for BKV infection. CONCLUSIONS: Acute rejection and low hemoglobin were risk factors for BKV infection after renal transplantation.