Steroid-Refractory Myocarditis Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Responded to Infliximab: Report of Two Cases and Literature Review.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand (PD-1/PD-L1) as well as anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), have been widely used for treating solid tumors. Myocarditis is a potentially lethal immune-related adverse events (irAEs) caused by ICIs therapy. The treatment of steroid-refractory myocarditis is challenging. We reported two non-small-cell lung cancer patients with steroid-refractory myocarditis induced by ICI. The symptoms were not resolved after pulse corticosteroid therapy and subsequent treatment including intravenous immunoglobulin and mycophenolate mofetil. Considering the level of serum interleukin (IL)-6 decreased by > 50% and level of serum tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) increased during the course of the disease, infliximab was used. Myocarditis gradually alleviated after infliximab treatment. The cases revealed that specific cytokine inhibitors have promising roles in the treatment of steroid-refractory myocarditis. Infliximab could be considered for patients with low level of IL-6 and elevated level of TNF-α.

Neurological Side Effects of TNF-α Inhibitors Revisited: A Review of Case Reports.

Over the past two decades, the use of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors has significantly improved the treatment of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Firstly, introduced for rheumatoid arthritis, these inhibitors are currently approved and used for a variety of conditions, including ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative colitis, and chronic uveitis. Despite their immense therapeutic efficacy, TNF-α inhibitors have been associated with neurological adverse effects that bring new clinical challenges. The present review collects data from multiple studies to evaluate the incidence and the relationship between TNF-α inhibitors and neurological side effects and to explore the potential underlying mechanisms of this association. Moreover, it highlights the importance of patient selection, particularly in the case of individuals with a history of demyelinating diseases, raises awareness for clinicians, and calls for ongoing research that will improve TNF-α targeting strategies and offer safer and more effective therapeutic options.

Evaluation of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving different sequences of first- and second-line biologic treatments: findings from ROTARY.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at risk of developing dysplasia and, subsequently, colorectal cancer (CRC) owing to chronic inflammation. Patients may also experience other severe disease complications, such as hospitalization and surgery. Several biologics are available for the treatment of patients with IBD and some patients require multiple lines of treatment owing to loss of response or tolerability to their prescribed biologic. Previous studies suggest that the choice of initial biologic treatment may impact the outcomes of later treatment lines. In this study, we assessed adverse clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who received different biologic treatment sequences. METHODS: ROTARY part B was a retrospective cohort study using the Optum® Clinical Database that evaluated the incidences of IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, dysplasia, CRC, and infections in patients with CD or UC who received two biologics successively. First-line biologics included adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab (CD only), and vedolizumab; second-line biologics included infliximab and adalimumab. RESULTS: In patients with CD, the treatment sequence of ustekinumab to infliximab was associated with the highest overall incidences of hospitalization (51.9%), surgery (40.7%), CRC (3.7%), and infection (37.0%). Vedolizumab followed by an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of experiencing an adverse medical event (hospitalization, surgery, or infection) than two successive anti-TNFα treatments (odds ratio, 1.526; 95% confidence interval, 1.004-2.320; P < 0.05). In patients with UC, the treatment sequence of vedolizumab to adalimumab resulted in the lowest overall incidence of adverse outcomes (20.3%, 6.3%, 0.0%, 6.3%, and 4.7% for hospitalization, surgery, CRC, dysplasia, and infection, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We describe differences in adverse clinical outcomes associated with sequencing of biologics in patients with CD or UC and demonstrate favorable results in patients who received vedolizumab as a first-line biologic. These results provide potential guidance to clinicians choosing sequences of biologic treatments in patients with IBD.

Co-occurrence of oral pemphigus vulgaris and herpes simplex virus infection in a young patient with Crohn's disease: report of a rare case of oral lesions during anti-TFN alpha and immunomodulator therapy.

BACKGROUND: Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a potentially life-threatening mucocutaneous autoimmune disease that affects desmoglein-1 and desmoglein-3, leading to intraepithelial vesiculobullous lesions. In the oral mucosa, PV lesions can mimic other diseases such as mucous membrane pemphigoid, other forms of pemphigus, recurrent aphthous stomatitis, erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and virus-induced ulcers like herpes simplex virus (HSV), making diagnosis challenging. The co-occurrence of PV with Crohn's disease is rare and predominantly seen in younger patients. The therapeutic mainstay for both PV and Crohn's disease usually involves systemic corticosteroids combined with immunosuppressants and immunobiological drugs. Literature indicates that the use of these drugs, particularly TNF-alpha inhibitors, for managing autoimmune diseases like Crohn's can potentially induce other autoimmune diseases known as autoimmune-like syndromes, which include episodes of lupus-like syndrome and inflammatory neuropathies. There are few cases in the literature reporting the development of PV in individuals with CD undergoing infliximab therapy. CASE REPORT: A young female with severe Crohn's disease, treated with the TNF-alpha inhibitor infliximab, developed friable pseudomembranous oral ulcerations. Histopathological and immunofluorescence analyses confirmed these as PV. The treatment included clobetasol propionate and low-level photobiomodulation, which resulted in partial improvement. The patient later experienced severe intestinal bleeding, requiring intravenous hydrocortisone therapy, which improved both her systemic condition and oral lesions. Weeks later, new ulcerations caused by herpes virus and candidiasis were identified, leading to treatment with oral acyclovir, a 21-day regimen of oral nystatin rinse, and photodynamic therapy, ultimately healing the oral infections. To manage her condition, the gastroenterologists included methotrexate (25 mg) in her regimen to reduce the immunogenicity of infliximab and minimize corticosteroid use, as the patient was in remission for Crohn's disease, and the oral PV lesions were under control. CONCLUSION: Young patients with Crohn's disease should be referred to an oral medicine specialist for comorbidity investigation, as oral PV and opportunistic infections can arise during immunosuppressive therapy. The use of TNF-alpha inhibitors in patients treated for inflammatory bowel disease, such as Crohn's, should be carefully evaluated for potential side effects, including oral PV.

Risks and benefits of anti-TNF therapy for ulcerative colitis in a patient with autoimmune hepatitis-related cirrhosis: Case report.

RATIONALE: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) characterized by continuous inflammation of the colonic mucosa. Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease characterized by hypergammaglobulinemia, circulating autoantibodies, interface hepatitis, and favorable response to immunosuppression. An association between IBD and AIH is uncommon, and experts have suggested that in patients with overlapping IBD and AIH, the anti-tumor necrosis factor agents can be used. Therefore, this study reports a rare case of a patient with liver cirrhosis due to AIH and UC refractory to conventional treatment and discusses the risks and benefits of using anti-tumor necrosis factor in both conditions. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 28-year-old female presented with symptoms of diarrhea, abdominal pain, asthenia, and inappetence, accompanied by abdominal collateral circulation, anemia, alteration of liver enzymes, and elevation of C-reactive protein levels. DIAGNOSES: The patient underwent a liver biopsy, which was consistent with liver cirrhosis due to AIH. Colonoscopy showed an inflammatory process throughout the colon, compatible with moderately active UC. INTERVENTIONS: The patient received mesalazine, azathioprine, and corticotherapy, with no control of the inflammatory process. Faced with refractoriness to drug treatment and side effects of corticosteroids with an increased risk of severe infection due to cirrhosis, we opted to use infliximab for the treatment of UC. The patient presented with a clinical response and infliximab therapy was maintained. OUTCOMES: Eight months after starting infliximab therapy, the patient developed pneumonia with complications from disseminated intravascular coagulation and died. LESSONS SUBSECTIONS: AIH is a rare cause of elevated transaminase levels in patients with UC. The best treatment to control the 2 conditions should be evaluated with vigilance for the side effects of medications, mainly infections, especially in patients with cirrhosis.

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors enhance corticosteroid therapy for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis linked to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a prospective study.

Introduction: Immune-related epidermal necrolysis (irEN), including Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), represents a potentially lethal reaction to immune checkpoint inhibitors. An optimal treatment strategy remains undefined. This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy with corticosteroids and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in treating irEN patients. Methods: In this single-center, prospective, observational study, patients with irEN received either corticosteroid monotherapy or a combination therapy of corticosteroids and TNFi (etanercept for SJS, infliximab for TEN). The primary endpoint was re-epithelization time, with secondary endpoints including corticosteroid exposure, major adverse event incidence, acute mortality rates, and biomarkers indicating disease activity and prognosis. The study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100051052). Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled (21 SJS, 11 TEN); 14 received combination therapy and 18 received corticosteroid monotherapy. IrEN typically occurred after 1 cycle of ICI administration, with a median latency of 16 days. Despite higher SCORTEN scores in the combination group (3 vs. 2, p = 0.008), these patients experienced faster re-epithelization (14 vs. 21 days; p < 0.001), shorter corticosteroid treatment duration (22 vs. 32 days; p = 0.005), and lower prednisone cumulative dose (1177 mg vs. 1594 mg; p = 0.073). Major adverse event rates were similar between groups. Three deaths occurred due to lung infection or disseminated intravascular coagulation, with mortality rates for both groups lower than predicted. Potential risk factors for increased mortality included continuous reduction in lymphocyte subset counts (CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, natural killer cells) and consistent rises in inflammatory markers (serum ferritin, interleukin-6, TNF-α). Re-epithelization time negatively correlated with body mass index and positively correlated with epidermal detachment area and serum levels of interleukin-6 and TNF-α. Conclusions: Corticosteroids combined with TNFi markedly promote re-epithelization, reduce corticosteroid use, and decrease acute mortality in irEN patients without increasing major adverse events, offering a superior alternative to corticosteroid monotherapy. Inflammatory markers and lymphocyte subsets are valuable for assessing disease activity and prognosis.

Efficacy and safety of infliximab and adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), consists of two primary types: Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD). Infliximab (IFX) and Adalimumab (ADA) are frequently utilized in the management of moderate to severe cases of IBD. AIM: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of IFX and ADA in individuals diagnosed with moderate to severe IBD. METHOD: This study is a prospective open-labeled randomized parallel study that included moderate to severe IBD patients treated with either IFX or ADA. A total of 56 patients participated, with 34 patients received IFX and 22 patients received ADA. Various measures, including Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Mayo Score/ Disease Activity Index (DAI), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, were taken at baseline and week 14 to assess the efficacy of the treatments. In addition, the levels of drugs and sTREM-1 were measured at 14 weeks. Patient safety was monitored throughout the study period. RESULTS: In the group received IFX, there was a notable decrease in CDAI (P = 0.045), DAI (P = 0.026), and CRP (P = 0.023 for CD, and P = 0.021 for UC) levels. In addition, the group received ADA experienced a significant reduction in CDAI (P = 0.001), DAI (P = 0.032), and CRP (P < 0.018 for CD and P = 0.003 for UC) levels. Responders had higher drug concentrations than non-responders, notably IFX concentration was higher in responders with CD (P = 0.001) and UC (P < 0.001). ADA concentration was higher in UC (P <= 0.001) and all CD patients responded to the treatment. The same trend was observed for sTREM-1 levels in CD and UC patients (P = 0.042, and P = 0.015, respectively) in the IFX group. In UC patients treated with ADA, the level of sTREM-1 was significantly low (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Both IFX and ADA have a good safety profile and deliver a beneficial clinical and laboratory response in moderate-severe IBD patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT05291039. (You can access the study at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05291039 (First Posted: March 22, 2022).

Tocilizumab-induced psoriatic eruption : a case report and a case-based review.

BACKGROUND: Cases of psoriasis associated with Tocilizumab (TCZ) are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To describe a new case of TCZ-associated psoriasis and to perform a case-based review of similar cases. METHODS: We searched Medline/Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Directory of Open Access Journals databases using the terms « Tocilizumab ¼ and « Psoriasis ¼ in the French and English literature. RESULTS: We report a 70-year-old woman with a history of Rheumatoid Arthritis who developed Infliximab-induced plaque psoriatic eruption of the soles and palms, that resolved after Infliximab interruption, then relapsed after TCZ relay, and eventually resolved after TCZ interruption. Including our case, we identified 16 cases of TCZ-induced psoriatic eruption. Three (21%) out of 14 patients had a history of cutaneous psoriasis - data were not available for 2 patients. Eight (50%) patients had previously received TNFα antagonists. TCZ was stopped for 10 patients and continued for 4 patients. For the 2 remaining patients, the interval between two injections of TCZ was shortened. All the patients with available follow-up data had an improvement of the eruption within 4 weeks. CONCLUSION: To conclude, in case of TCZ-induced psoriatic eruption and in light of the published cases, we suggest using topical steroids and reassessing the patient 4 weeks later. If no healing is obtained, we suggest stopping TCZ, and treating the underlying disease with another drug. When no other drug is available, while waiting for more data regarding the value of IL-6 levels, it can be discussed to increase TCZ regimen, as it has been successful for 2 authors. Efficacy assessment of the chosen attitude should not take place before 4 weeks.

Dermal lesions associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor α therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): findings from a tertiary IBD center in Poland.

INTRODUCTION: There are scarce data on the occurrence of dermal lesions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNF­α) antibodies. Characteristics of the skin lesions, their clinical course, and impact on treatment are of high importance. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, risk factors, and clinical sequelae of dermal lesions in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF­α antibodies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single­center study evaluated 541 IBD patients treated with anti-TNF­α drugs and 688 IBD individuals with no history of anti-TNF­α treatment. RESULTS: Higher prevalence of dermal lesions was noted in the patients on anti-TNF­α therapy than in the individuals not receiving such treatment (30.9% vs 16.4%; P <0.001). Risk factors for dermal lesions included higher body mass index (BMI), Crohn disease located in the small intestine, and longer duration of therapy. Some types of dermal lesions were associated with anti-TNF­α therapy; these included infusion reactions and injection site reactions, cutaneous infection, psorasiform reactions, and lupus­like symptoms. Overall, 5.9% of the patients on anti-TNF­α therapy required treatment change or discontinuation due to dermal lesions (alopecia, lupus­like symptoms, melanoma, and psoriasis). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a higher prevalence of dermal lesions in patients with IBD undergoing anti-TNF­α therapy than in the treatment-naive group, although development of such lesions rarely necessitated a change in or discontinuation of treatment. Patients with IBD should regularly undergo follow-up dermatologic evaluation, which may improve detection of dermal lesions. Moreover, biologic therapy in IBD patients requires close collaboration with an experienced dermatologist.

The Safety Profiles of Adalimumab, Infliximab, Etanercept, Secukinumab and Ustekinumab in Psoriasis - A 30-month Observational Cohort Prospective Study of Adverse Events in Biologic Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Although biologic agents are very effective, long-term comparative studies demonstrating their safety relative to one another are still lacking. METHODS: A total of 124 patients with psoriasis were followed up for 30 months; 74 received anti-TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab), 33 were on ustekinumab, and 17 were treated with secukinumab. The rates of adverse events in these groups were recorded and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Infliximab-treated patients showed a high occurrence of asymptomatic, but increased liver enzymes, fatigue, and respiratory as well as dermatologic infections. Adalimumab-treated patients were more often affected by musculoskeletal disorders and infections of all types. Patients treated with secukinumab presented with higher rates of cardiovascular disorders as well as respiratory and dermatologic infections. The group receiving etanercept was more often diagnosed with musculoskeletal and reproductive disorders, specifically menstrual disorders. The rates of therapy discontinuation and serious adverse events did not reach statistically significant values. CONCLUSION: A higher incidence of adverse events was observed among adalimumab-, and infliximab-treated patients, with ustekinumab found to have the safest profile. Our results demonstrate that a personalized approach, including evaluation of a patient's risk profile, is necessary before commencing a biologic. Further research is warranted to confirm the findings of our study.

Merkel cell carcinoma associated with TNF inhibitor therapy: a systematic review of case reports.

A rare neuroendocrine skin cancer called Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) primarily affects elderly people. The objective of this study is to comprehensively review the impact of immunosuppressive medications, particularly TNF inhibitors, on the emergence of MCC. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library were searched. Study articles were screened by title and abstract at Rayyan Qatar Computing Research Institute, then a full-text assessment was implemented. RESULTS: A total of eight case reports with 9 patients were included. Of the total population, seven were women and only two were men. Their age ranged from 31 to 73 years. More than half the population (5 cases) were being treated for rheumatoid arthritis. All received TNF inhibitors that were associated with the induction of MCC. CONCLUSION: We found that it is essential for physicians to explain potential cancer risks to patients before starting long-term immunosuppressive therapy and to conduct routine checks for MCC and other side effects. TNF inhibitors (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, and golimumab) were all associated with MCC development. Women constituted the majority of cases and most were elderly.

Infliximab in steroid-refractory immune-related hepatitis does not demonstrate hepatotoxicity and may shorten time on steroids.

BACKGROUND: Immune-related hepatitis (irHepatitis) is a relatively common immune-related adverse event (irAE) of checkpoint inhibitors. Often, it responds well to steroids; however, in refractory cases, further therapy is needed. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibodies are used for management of multiple irAEs, but there are little data in irHepatitis. Here, we report on safety and efficacy of infliximab in 10 cases of steroid-refractory irHepatitis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with infliximab for steroid-refractory grade ≥3 irHepatitis at the Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich. The positive response to infliximab was defined as no further increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) above 50% than at the time of first infliximab infusion and control of irHepatitis without therapies other than steroids and infliximab. RESULTS: 10 patients with steroid-resistant irHepatitis grade ≥3 were treated with infliximab 5 mg/kg, of whom 7 (70%) responded positively. In two cases, the liver values increased over 50% before the irHepatitis could be controlled. In another case, therapies other than infliximab and steroids were given. At the median follow-up of 487 days, 90% of the patients demonstrated resolved irHepatitis without AST/ALT elevation following infliximab infusions. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of irHepatitis with infliximab did not result in hepatotoxicity and led to long-lasting positive response in 9 of 10 of the cases. Further research is needed to evaluate the role of anti-TNF antibodies in management of irHepatitis.

A patient with axial spondylarthritis who experienced pancytopenia while receiving anti-TNF therapy.

Aplastic anemia is a rare and heterogeneous disease that causes pancytopenia and aplasia of the bone marrow. It is characterized by a failure of hematopoiesis. It is believed that approximately 65% of cases of acquired aplastic anemia are idiopathic. In a subset of cases, a drug or infection is the cause of bone marrow failure. This case report presents a 38-year-old patient with axial spondylarthritis who developed pancytopenia and was diagnosed with aplastic anemia during anti-TNF-α treatment.

Infliximab biosimilar GP1111: a review of 5 years' post-approval experience.

INTRODUCTION: Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor alpha, and GP1111 (Zessly®, Sandoz) is the most recently approved infliximab biosimilar in Europe. We reviewed the approval process and key evidence for GP1111, focusing primarily on the indications of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). AREAS COVERED: This narrative review discusses preclinical, clinical, and real-world data for GP1111. EXPERT OPINION: Results from the Phase III REFLECTIONS trial in patients with moderate-to-severe active RA despite methotrexate therapy confirmed the similarity in efficacy and safety between GP1111 and reference infliximab. Switching from reference infliximab to GP1111 in REFLECTIONS had no impact on efficacy or safety. Since the European approval of GP1111 in March 2018, real-world data have also confirmed the efficacy and safety of switching from another infliximab biosimilar to GP1111 in patients with RA and IBD. In addition, budget impact analysis of various sequential targeted treatments in patients with RA found that GP1111 was cost-effective when used early after failure of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Therefore, 5 years' post-approval experience with GP1111 in RA and IBD, and key clinical and real-world evidence, support the safety and efficacy of continued use of GP1111 in all infliximab-approved indications.

Systematic review: effectiveness and safety of switching between originator infliximab and biosimilar infliximab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

INTRODUCTION: Infliximab (IFX) biosimilars are available to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), offering cost reductions versus originator IFX in some jurisdictions. However, concerns remain regarding the efficacy and safety of originator-to-biosimilar switching. This systematic literature review evaluated safety and effectiveness of switching between IFX products in patients with IBD, including multiple switchers. METHODS: Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to capture studies (2012-2022) including patients with IBD who switched between approved IFX products. Effectiveness outcomes: disease activity; disease severity; response to treatment; patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Safety outcomes: incidence and rate of adverse events (AEs); discontinuations due to AEs, failure rate; hospitalizations; surgeries. Immunogenicity outcomes (n, %): anti-drug antibodies; patients receiving concomitant immunomodulatory medication. RESULTS: Data from 85 publications (81 observational, two randomized controlled trials) were included. Clinical effectiveness outcomes were consistent with the known profile of originator IFX with no difference after switching. There were no unexpected/serious AEs after switching, and rates of AEs were generally consistent with the known profile of IFX. CONCLUSIONS: Most studies reported that clinical, PROs, and safety outcomes for originator-to-biosimilar switching were clinically equivalent to originator responses. Limited data are available regarding multiple switches. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42021289144.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome in a Patient Receiving Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor for Crohn Disease: Coincidence or Consequence?

BACKGROUND Antibodies against tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-alpha) are currently widely used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), despite a number of reported adverse effects. Diverse neurologic syndromes, including the Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), an immune-mediated disease characterized by evolving ascending limb weakness, sensory loss, and areflexia, have been described in association with anti-TNF-alpha therapy. CASE REPORT A 45-year-old White woman was in follow-up with fistulizing ileocolonic Crohn disease using combination therapy (infliximab plus azathioprine) as CD maintenance therapy. After 3 years of this immunosuppressive therapy, she presented with symmetrical and ascending paresis in the lower limbs, and later in the upper limbs, in addition to reduced reflexes in the knees, 1 day after an infliximab infusion. The patient was hospitalized and treatment for CD was suspended. Neurophysiology studies demonstrated a pattern compatible with acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculopathy, with predominantly motor involvement, consistent with Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS). Clinical, laboratory, and imaging exams were unremarkable. She was treated with intravenous immunoglobulins, with a progressive and complete resolution of neurological symptoms. After 1-year follow-up, she presented with active Crohn disease, and we opted for treating her with vedolizumab, with which she achieved clinical and endoscopic remission. CONCLUSIONS Patients receiving biological therapy with anti-TNF-alpha agents should be monitored for central or peripheral neurological signs and symptoms. The development of GBS can be secondary to anti-TNF-alpha treatment. The positive temporal relationship with TNF-alpha therapy and onset of neurological symptoms reinforces this possibility.