RESUMO
Introduction: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with a higher risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality, as well as long-term health issues in newborns. Currently, there is no effective medicine for FGR. Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors have been shown in pre-clinical studies to improve FGR. This study aimed to evaluate the latest evidence about the clinical outcomes and safety of PDE-5 inhibitors for the management of FGR. Methods: Eight databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Database and WangFang Database) were searched for English and Chinese articles published from the database inception to December 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the use of PDE-5 inhibitors in FGR were included. The quality of the RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Odds ratio and mean difference (MD) (95% confidence intervals) were pooled for meta-analysis. Results: From 253 retrieved publications, 16 studies involving 1,492 pregnant women met the inclusion criteria. Only sildenafil (15 RCTs) and tadalafil (1 RCT) were studied for FGR. Compared with the control group (placebo, no treatment, or other medication therapies), sildenafil increased birth weight, pregnancy prolongation and umbilical artery pulsatility indices. However, it also increased the risk of pulmonary hypertension in newborns, as well as headache and flushing/rash in mothers. There were no significant differences in gestation age, perinatal mortality or major neonatal morbidity, stillbirth, neonate death, infants admitted to neonatal intensive care unit, intraventricular hemorrhage and necrotizing enterocolitis in infants, as well as pregnancy hypertension and gastrointestinal side effects in mothers between the treatment and the control groups. Discussion: Sildenafil was the most investigated PDE-5 inhibitors for FGR. Current evidence suggests that sildenafil can improve birth weight and duration of pregnancy but at the same time increase the risk of neonatal pulmonary hypertension. It remains uncertain whether the benefits of sildenafil in FGR outweigh the risks and further high-quality RCTs are warranted. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=325909.
Assuntos
Retardo do Crescimento Fetal , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5 , Humanos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêutico , Retardo do Crescimento Fetal/tratamento farmacológico , Gravidez , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To study the effects of benign prostatic hyperplasia treatments, namely: alpha-adrenergic receptor blockers, 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors on the risk of Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All male Medicare enrollees aged 65 or above who were diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia and received one of the study drugs between 2007-2020 were followed-up for the three outcomes. We used Cox regression analysis to assess the relative risk of each of the outcomes for each study drug compared to the most prescribed drug, tamsulosin, while controlling for demographic, socioeconomic and comorbidity factors. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The study analyzed 1.1 million patients for a mean follow-up period of 3.1 years from being prescribed one of the study drugs. For all outcomes, patients on tamsulosin were used as the reference for comparison. For mortality, alfuzosin was associated with 27% risk reduction (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.68-0.78), and doxazosin with 6% risk reduction (HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.91-0.97). For Parkinson's disease, terazosin was associated with 26% risk reduction (HR 0.74, 95%CI 0.66-0.83), and doxazosin with 21% risk reduction (HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.72-0.88). For Alzheimer's disease, terazosin was associated with 27% risk reduction (HR 0.73, 95%CI 0.65-0.82), and doxazosin with 16% risk reduction (HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.76-0.92). Tadalafil was associated with risk reduction (27-40%) in all 3 outcomes. More research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of these observations. Given the availability of safer alternatives for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia, caution should be exercised when using tamsulosin in elderly patients, especially those with an increased risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases.
Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Medicare , Doença de Parkinson , Hiperplasia Prostática , Tansulosina , Humanos , Masculino , Tansulosina/uso terapêutico , Tansulosina/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamento farmacológico , Hiperplasia Prostática/mortalidade , Hiperplasia Prostática/epidemiologia , Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Alzheimer/mortalidade , Doença de Alzheimer/epidemiologia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/mortalidade , Doença de Parkinson/epidemiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de 5-alfa Redutase/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de 5-alfa Redutase/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Pharmacoepidemiologic studies using routinely collected data allow researchers to propose drugs for repurposing trials for dementia prevention or treatment. A recent cohort study reported a 54% lower dementia risk among users of sildenafil compared to users of certain cardiovascular medications. We caution that "confounding by indication" can arise when outcomes are compared between a drug of interest and an inappropriate comparator. Here, we emphasize important considerations in selecting an active comparator. We assess the implications of substantial risk of confounding by indication in pharmacoepidemiologic studies linking phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors to lower dementia risk.
Assuntos
Demência , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5 , Humanos , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Demência/epidemiologia , Demência/tratamento farmacológico , Farmacoepidemiologia/métodos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Citrato de Sildenafila/uso terapêutico , Citrato de Sildenafila/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are currently no Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD), which is physiologically analogous to male erectile dysfunction. AIMS: The study sought to test the systemic and local genital safety of topical sildenafil cream, 3.6% (sildenafil cream) among healthy premenopausal women with FSAD and their sexual partners over a 12-week treatment period. METHODS: This was a phase 2b, exploratory, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of sildenafil cream among healthy premenopausal women with FSAD. Safety was assessed by the frequency and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) among participants and their sexual partners. Participants recorded the incidence of TEAEs in a daily eDiary (electronic diary). Sexual partners were contacted within 72 hours of each sexual event in which investigational product was used. All participants used placebo cream for 1 month, during a single-blind run-in period, and then if eligible, were randomized 1:1 to sildenafil cream or placebo cream. Participants used their assigned investigational product over a 12-week double-blind dosing period. They attended monthly follow-up visits, in which their eDiary TEAE data were reviewed by the study staff and graded for severity and relationship to study product. OUTCOMES: The frequency and incidence of TEAEs among participants and their sexual partners. RESULTS: During the 12-week double-blind dosing period, there were 78 TEAEs reported by 29 of 99 sildenafil-assigned participants and 65 TEAEs reported by 28 of 94 placebo-assigned participants (P = .76). All TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. The most common treatment-related TEAE among active and placebo-assigned participants was application site discomfort. There were no differences in the number of treatment-related TEAEs among sildenafil cream vs placebo cream users (P > .99). Four sildenafil cream participants and 3 placebo cream participants discontinued the study due to TEAEs involving application site discomfort (P > .99). There were 9 TEAEs reported by 7 of 91 sexual partners exposed to sildenafil cream vs 4 TEAEs reported by 4 of 84 sexual partners exposed to placebo cream (P = .54). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These data support further clinical development of topical sildenafil cream for the treatment of FSAD. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Safety was assessed among participants and their sexual partners after 1357 and 1160 sexual experiences in which sildenafil cream or placebo cream were used, respectively. The phase 2b study was powered for the primary objectives of efficacy, rather than safety. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that topically applied sildenafil cream was safe and well tolerated by exposed users and their sexual partners.
Assuntos
Citrato de Sildenafila , Humanos , Citrato de Sildenafila/administração & dosagem , Citrato de Sildenafila/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Método Duplo-Cego , Adulto , Administração Tópica , Disfunções Sexuais Psicogênicas/tratamento farmacológico , Parceiros Sexuais , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vascular cognitive impairment due to cerebral small vessel disease is associated with cerebral pulsatility, white matter hypoperfusion, and reduced cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), and is potentially improved by endothelium-targeted drugs such as cilostazol. Whether sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, improves cerebrovascular dysfunction is unknown. METHODS: OxHARP trial (Oxford Haemodynamic Adaptation to Reduce Pulsatility) was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 3-way crossover trial after nonembolic cerebrovascular events with mild-moderate white matter hyperintensities (WMH), the most prevalent manifestation of cerebral small vessel disease. The primary outcome assessed the superiority of 3 weeks of sildenafil 50 mg thrice daily versus placebo (mixed-effect linear models) on middle cerebral artery pulsatility, derived from peak systolic and end-diastolic velocities (transcranial ultrasound), with noninferiority to cilostazol 100 mg twice daily. Secondary end points included the following: cerebrovascular reactivity during inhalation of air, 4% and 6% CO2 on transcranial ultrasound (transcranial ultrasound-CVR); blood oxygen-level dependent-magnetic resonance imaging within WMH (CVR-WMH) and normal-appearing white matter (CVR-normal-appearing white matter); cerebral perfusion by arterial spin labeling (magnetic resonance imaging pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling); and resistance by cerebrovascular conductance. Adverse effects were compared by Cochran Q. RESULTS: In 65/75 (87%) patients (median, 70 years;79% male) with valid primary outcome data, cerebral pulsatility was unchanged on sildenafil versus placebo (0.02, -0.01 to 0.05; P=0.18), or versus cilostazol (-0.01, -0.04 to 0.02; P=0.36), despite increased blood flow (∆ peak systolic velocity, 6.3 cm/s, 3.5-9.07; P<0.001; ∆ end-diastolic velocity, 1.98, 0.66-3.29; P=0.004). Secondary outcomes improved on sildenafil versus placebo for CVR-transcranial ultrasound (0.83 cm/s per mmâ Hg, 0.23-1.42; P=0.007), CVR-WMH (0.07, 0-0.14; P=0.043), CVR-normal-appearing white matter (0.06, 0.00-0.12; P=0.048), perfusion (WMH: 1.82 mL/100 g per minute, 0.5-3.15; P=0.008; and normal-appearing white matter, 2.12, 0.66-3.6; P=0.006) and cerebrovascular resistance (sildenafil-placebo: 0.08, 0.05-0.10; P=4.9×10-8; cilostazol-placebo, 0.06, 0.03-0.09; P=5.1×10-5). Both drugs increased headaches (P=1.1×10-4), while cilostazol increased moderate-severe diarrhea (P=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil did not reduce pulsatility but increased cerebrovascular reactivity and perfusion. Sildenafil merits further study to determine whether it prevents the clinical sequelae of small vessel disease. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03855332; Unique identifier: NCT03855332.
Assuntos
Doenças de Pequenos Vasos Cerebrais , Circulação Cerebrovascular , Estudos Cross-Over , Citrato de Sildenafila , Humanos , Citrato de Sildenafila/uso terapêutico , Citrato de Sildenafila/farmacologia , Citrato de Sildenafila/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Doenças de Pequenos Vasos Cerebrais/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças de Pequenos Vasos Cerebrais/fisiopatologia , Doenças de Pequenos Vasos Cerebrais/diagnóstico por imagem , Circulação Cerebrovascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cilostazol/uso terapêutico , Cilostazol/farmacologia , Cilostazol/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/farmacologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Fluxo Pulsátil/efeitos dos fármacos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Artéria Cerebral Média/efeitos dos fármacos , Artéria Cerebral Média/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Cerebral Média/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: We assessed the efficacy and safety of tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and combined postcapillary and precapillary pulmonary hypertension. METHODS: In the double-blind PASSION study (Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Combined Post- and Pre-Capillary Pulmonary Hypertension), patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and combined postcapillary and precapillary pulmonary hypertension were randomized 1:1 to receive tadalafil at a target dose of 40 mg or placebo. The primary end point was the time to the first composite event of adjudicated heart failure hospitalization or all-cause death. Secondary end points included all-cause mortality and improvements in New York Heart Association functional class or ≥10% improvement in 6-minute walking distance from baseline. RESULTS: Initially targeting 372 patients, the study was terminated early because of disruption in study medication supply. At that point, 125 patients had been randomized (placebo: 63; tadalafil: 62,). Combined primary end-point events occurred in 20 patients (32%) assigned to placebo and 17 patients (27%) assigned to tadalafil (hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.52-2.01]; P=0.95). There was a possible signal of higher all-cause mortality in the tadalafil group (hazard ratio, 5.10 [95% CI, 1.10-23.69]; P=0.04). No significant between-group differences were observed in other secondary end points. Serious adverse events occurred in 29 participants (48%) in the tadalafil group and 35 (56%) in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: The PASSION trial, terminated prematurely due to study medication supply disruption, does not support tadalafil use in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and combined postcapillary and precapillary pulmonary hypertension, with potential safety concerns and no observed benefits in primary and secondary end points. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/; Unique identifier: 2017-003688-37. URL: https://drks.de; Unique identifier: DRKS -DRKS00014595.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Hipertensão Pulmonar , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5 , Volume Sistólico , Tadalafila , Humanos , Tadalafila/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Feminino , Volume Sistólico/efeitos dos fármacos , Hipertensão Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão Pulmonar/mortalidade , Hipertensão Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método Duplo-Cego , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Daily (once a day [OaD]) tadalafil intake is a valuable option for men favoring spontaneous over scheduled sexual intercourse. AIM: The study sought to assess the rate of and the clinical factors associated with spontaneous, medication-free erectile function (EF) recovery after discontinuation of tadalafil 5 mg OaD in a cohort of young men seeking first medical help for psychogenic erectile dysfunction (ED) as their primary complaint. METHODS: Data from 96 consecutive patients <50 years of age seeking first medical help for ED and prescribed tadalafil 5 mg OaD were analyzed. Patients completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and underwent baseline penile color Doppler ultrasound. Follow-up involved clinical assessments or phone interviews. Spontaneous medication-free EF recovery was defined as IIEF EF domain score >22 after tadalafil discontinuation, prompting cessation of follow-up. Descriptive statistics compared tadalafil OaD responders and nonresponders. Cox regression hazard models explored the association between baseline characteristics and EF recovery risk post-drug discontinuation. Kaplan-Meier analyses estimated EF recovery probability over time. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was EF recovery after discontinuation of tadalafil 5 mg OaD. RESULTS: Overall, median age was 39 (interquartile range [IQR], 32-45) years. Of all, 82 (85.4%) patients achieved EF recovery after tadalafil OaD discontinuation, while 14 (14.6%) patients were identified as nonresponders. Median tadalafil usage time (from beginning to discontinuation) was 3 (IQR, 2-11) months. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was headache in 9 (9.4%) patients. Nonresponders were older (43 [IQR, 42-45] years vs 38 [IQR, 31-44] years; P = .03), had higher body mass index (25.5 [IQR, 23.4-29.9] kg/m2 vs 23.6 [IQR, 21.8-25.9] kg/m2; P = .04), and reported lower baseline IIEF EF domain scores (12 [IQR, 7-15] vs 15 [IQR, 10-22]; P = .02) than responders. Nonresponders and responders did not differ in terms of baseline ED severity, Charlson comorbidity index, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular physical exercise, and color Doppler ultrasound parameters. Upon Cox regression analysis, younger age (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.99; P = .01) was associated to EF recovery, after adjusting for baseline ED severity, body mass index, smoking, and Charlson comorbidity index ≥1. The Kaplan-Meier analysis displays the probability of EF recovery over time, indicating rates of 43%, 60%, and 72% at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up intervals, respectively. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Tadalafil 5 mg OaD is an effective short-term treatment for psychogenic ED, allowing its discontinuation after achieving a normal medication-free EF. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: The main limitations are the limited number of participants and the potential neglect of confounding factors. CONCLUSION: Almost 1 out of 2 young men with primary psychogenic ED who were prescribed with tadalafil 5 mg OaD recovered spontaneous medication-free EF after 3 months of treatment. Overall, the younger the patient was, the higher the chance there was of spontaneous EF recovery after drug discontinuation.
Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5 , Tadalafila , Humanos , Masculino , Tadalafila/uso terapêutico , Tadalafila/administração & dosagem , Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/administração & dosagem , Ereção Peniana/efeitos dos fármacos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esquema de MedicaçãoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The pillar for therapeutic decisions in the evolution of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is the patients' prognostic stratification. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a Spanish real-world setting to assess the clinical improvement of PAH patients treated with selexipag measured as changes in the risk profile. Secondary objectives were to describe their baseline characteristics, initial risk status, and variables used to assess patient survival and adverse events. FINDINGS: Total 42 patients (mean age 52.36 [SD: 15.09] years) were included. All had received initial endothelin receptor antagonist treatment and 95.2% dual therapy with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor or riociguat. At 6 to 12 months from baseline, patients risk stratification tripled the percentage of patients with low risk, and a trend towards improved risk stratification (P = 0.122). World Health Organization functional class changed, with more patients in milder classes (P = 0.003), and symptom progression slowed down (P < 0.0001). At 3-years, survival was 85.7% and the estimated median survival time was 2.73 years (SD: 1.351; 95% CI: 2.51-2.95). IMPLICATIONS: Selexipag did not achieve a significant improvement in risk profile, although it did show an excellent survival rate, effectively improved functional class, and delayed symptom progression in real life. Selexipag was well tolerated and showed a favorable safety profile, supporting a clinical benefit for PAH patients.
Assuntos
Acetamidas , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acetamidas/uso terapêutico , Acetamidas/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Espanha , Idoso , Hipertensão Arterial Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão Arterial Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Pirazinas/uso terapêutico , Pirazinas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Receptores de Epoprostenol/agonistas , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Pirazóis/efeitos adversos , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Hipertensivos/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas dos Receptores de Endotelina/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas dos Receptores de Endotelina/efeitos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Hipertensão Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão Pulmonar/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sildenafil, approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), has a recommended adult dose of 20 mg TID, with a previously approved 5-mg TID dose by the US Food and Drug Administration. Safety concerns arose because of common off-label use of higher doses, particularly after pediatric data linked higher doses to increased mortality. To assess this, the Food and Drug Administration mandated a study evaluating the effects of various sildenafil doses on mortality in adults with PAH. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind study compared sildenafil at doses of 5, 20, or 80 mg TID in adults with PAH. The primary objective was noninferiority of 80 mg of sildenafil versus 5 mg for all-cause mortality. Secondary end points included time to clinical worsening and change in 6-minute walk distance at 6 months. Interim analyses were planned at 50% and 75% of the anticipated mortality events. Safety and tolerability were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: The study was halted after the first interim analysis, demonstrating noninferiority for 80 mg of sildenafil versus 5 mg. Of 385 patients enrolled across all dose groups, 78 died. The primary analysis showed a hazard ratio of 0.51 (99.7% CI, 0.22-1.21; P<0.001 for noninferiority) for overall survival comparing 80 mg of sildenafil with 5 mg. Time to clinical worsening favored 80 mg of sildenafil compared with 5 mg (hazard ratio, 0.44 [99.7% CI, 0.22-0.89]; P<0.001). Sildenafil at 80 mg improved 6-minute walk distance from baseline at 6 months compared with 5 mg (least square mean change, 18.9 m [95% CI, 2.99-34.86]; P=0.0201). No significant differences were found between 80 mg of sildenafil and 20 mg in mortality, clinical worsening, and 6-minute walk distance. Adverse event-related drug discontinuations were numerically higher with 80 mg of sildenafil. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil at 80 mg was noninferior to sildenafil at 5 mg when examining all-cause mortality in adults with PAH. Secondary efficacy end points favored 80 mg of sildenafil over 5 mg. On the basis of these findings, the Food and Drug Administration recently revoked the approval of 5 mg of sildenafil for adults with PAH, reinforced 20 mg TID as the recommended dose, and now allows dose titration up to 80 mg TID, if needed. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02060487.
Assuntos
Citrato de Sildenafila , Humanos , Citrato de Sildenafila/administração & dosagem , Citrato de Sildenafila/uso terapêutico , Citrato de Sildenafila/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método Duplo-Cego , Adulto , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Hipertensão Arterial Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão Arterial Pulmonar/mortalidade , Hipertensão Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão Pulmonar/mortalidade , Idoso , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Vasodilatadores/efeitos adversos , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Teste de Caminhada , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Spinal cord infarction is a rare condition, accounting for only a small percentage of strokes. It can be classified into cervical and thoracolumbar infarctions, with various factors contributing to its occurrence. Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor commonly used for erectile dysfunction, has been associated with cardiovascular side effects, including transient hypotension. In this case report, we present the unusual occurrence of spinal cord infarction in a 65-year-old man who had self-administered high doses of sildenafil without a doctor's prescription. The patient experienced severe radicular pain in the lumbar region and subsequent weakness in the lower limbs. Evaluation revealed an anterior spinal cord infarction in the thoracic region, confirmed by MRI imaging. After excluding other potential causes, it was concluded that the intake of sildenafil likely led to systemic hypotension, resulting in spinal cord infarction. This case highlights the importance of considering sildenafil as a possible contributor to spinal cord infarction, particularly when used at high doses. Further studies are needed to better understand the relationship between sildenafil and vascular complications, including spinal cord infarction.
Assuntos
Infarto , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5 , Citrato de Sildenafila , Medula Espinal , Humanos , Citrato de Sildenafila/efeitos adversos , Citrato de Sildenafila/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Idoso , Infarto/induzido quimicamente , Infarto/diagnóstico por imagem , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Medula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância MagnéticaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to characterize the ocular safety profiles of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors and explore the differences among different PDE5 inhibitors. METHODS: We analyzed reports on ocular adverse events associated with sildenafil, vardenafil and tadalafil submitted to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2023. Disproportionality analysis was conducted to evaluate reporting risk profiles. RESULTS: Among 61,211 reports qualifying for analysis, 5,127 involved sildenafil, 832 vardenafil, and 3,733 tadalafil. All PDE5 inhibitors showed increased reporting odds ratios (ROR) for ocular adverse events, with vardenafil highest (ROR 4.47) followed by sildenafil and tadalafil. Key ocular adverse events included cyanopsia, optic ischemic neuropathy, visual field defects, unilateral blindness and blindness. Sildenafil showed the highest disproportionality for cyanopsia (ROR 1148.11) while vardenafil and tadalafil showed the highest disproportionality for optic ischemic neuropathy. Time-to-onset analysis also revealed significant differences, with sildenafil having a later median time-to-onset compared to vardenafil and tadalafil. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive pharmacovigilance study reveals distinct patterns of ocular adverse events associated with PDE5 inhibitors. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the safety profiles of PDE5 inhibitors and may guide healthcare professionals in clinical decision-making.
Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Oftalmopatias , Farmacovigilância , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5 , Citrato de Sildenafila , Tadalafila , Dicloridrato de Vardenafila , Humanos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/administração & dosagem , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Tadalafila/efeitos adversos , Tadalafila/administração & dosagem , Citrato de Sildenafila/efeitos adversos , Citrato de Sildenafila/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Dicloridrato de Vardenafila/efeitos adversos , Dicloridrato de Vardenafila/administração & dosagem , Oftalmopatias/induzido quimicamente , Oftalmopatias/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , AdultoRESUMO
Aneurysm and arterial dissection have been reported as adverse drug events, associated with angiogenesis inhibitors and fluoroquinolones. Specifically, several cases of severe arterial disease following cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors usage have recently been reported. It is necessary to ascertain the risks of serious adverse events caused by PDE5 inhibitors. We aimed to evaluate the association of aneurysm and artery dissection with PDE5 inhibitors using VigiBase, which is a World Health Organization database of spontaneously reported adverse events, for explorative hypothesis-generating analysis. We performed disproportionality analysis using a dataset from inception in 1967 to December 2022 and calculated reporting odds ratios (ROR) between PDE5 inhibitors and arterial diseases. We extracted 195,839 reports on PDE5 inhibitors with 254 reports of arterial disease as adverse events from VigiBase. Disproportionality analysis showed disproportional signals for PDE5 inhibitors (ROR, 2.30;95% confidence intervals, 2.04-2.61);disproportional signals were detected in analyses restricting the lesion site to the aorta or cerebral arteries. From stratified analysis, disproportional signals were noted in females, as well as males, generally recognized as a risk factor for artery diseases. This real-world data analysis suggests that PDE5 inhibitors may play a role in the development of lethal arterial disease. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 134-140, February, 2024.
Assuntos
Dissecção Aórtica , Bases de Dados Factuais , Farmacovigilância , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5 , Humanos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Dissecção Aórtica/induzido quimicamente , Dissecção Aórtica/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Idoso , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Dissecção de Vasos SanguíneosRESUMO
AIMS: Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), which are widely used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), have been found to exhibit systemic vascular benefits by improving endothelial function. In this context, we sought to evaluate the effects of PDE5i on long-term cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted up to 30 May 2023. Cohort studies comparing PDE5i treatment at any dose with other ED treatment, placebo or no treatment and minimum follow-up duration of 6 months were considered eligible. The primary endpoints were: (1) major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and (2) all-cause mortality. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Sixteen studies were included (1 257 759 subjects-10.5% treated with PDE5i). The majority of patients (99.4%) were men [median age 61.5 years (range 30-72.8)]. The median follow-up duration was 4.3 years (range 6 months-7.5 years). PDE5i use was associated with a significant reduction in the composite of MACE (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69-0.89). Moreover, the analysis of pooled data from 13 studies, demonstrated that the use of PDE5i was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.87). CONCLUSION: The use of PDE5i primarily in men with or without known coronary artery disease was associated with a lower risk for cardiovascular events and overall mortality. This information underlines that PDE5i could provide clinical benefit beyond ED treatment and could instigate the conduction of further, large-scale randomized clinical trials.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Causas de Morte , Disfunção Erétil , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5 , Humanos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Tempo , Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Disfunção Erétil/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Medição de Risco , Adulto , Feminino , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Recent studies focused on exploring phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is)-related hearing impairment. This study aimed to comprehensively explore real-world hearing impairment associated with PDE5Is based on the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The characteristics and correlation of PDE5Is-related hearing impairment reported in the FAERS database from the fourth quarter of 2003 to the second quarter of 2023 were analyzed using disproportionality analysis. The Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Queries (SMQs) were used to analyze the adverse events (AEs) of hearing impairment. A total of 1,438 reported cases of hearing impairment were associated with four PDE5Is, revealing statistically significant reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and information component (IC) with the SMQ. The average age of all patients was more than 55 years, over 70% of AEs were reported in men. Most of the reported cases were from the United States. Reports for all the drugs indicated an increase since 2008, except for avanafil. This study showed that the disability rates of PDE5Is were 8.14-40%, the rates of initial or prolonged hospitalization were 6.21-10.24%, and the rates of required intervention were 3.31-9.45%. The pharmacovigilance study identified a potential risk of hearing impairment associated with PDE5Is, indicating the need for continuous monitoring and appropriate management.
Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Perda Auditiva , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5 , United States Food and Drug Administration , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Masculino , Perda Auditiva/induzido quimicamente , Perda Auditiva/epidemiologia , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Idoso , Adulto , Bases de Dados FactuaisRESUMO
PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and compliance of tadalafil 5 mg daily dose in the tablet form versus oral dispersible film (ODF) in men with mild-to-moderate erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: One hundred thirty-five randomized patients were equally divided into three groups according to age where each group included forty-five patients. Within each group, 15 patients received oral tadalafil 5 mg, 15 patients received ODF tadalafil 5 mg and 15 patients received a placebo once daily for 1 month. All participants were assessed by the validated Arabic version of the international index of erectile function (ArIIEF-5) at baseline and after 1 month. Also, the efficacy of different forms of tadalafil 5 mg was assessed by responding affirmatively to a questionnaire. RESULTS: Patients aged > 25 to < 40 years and 40-55 years and > 55 years showed a statistically significant improvement of ArIIEF-5 scores after tadalafil 5 mg tablet and ODF tadalafil 5 mg compared to placebo ODF (23 ± 1.4; 22.7 ± 0.9; 20 ± 0.9; 20.4 ± 1.3; 20.2 ± 1.2; 16.6 ± 1.2; 18.5 ± 1.7; 19.6 ± 1.4; 16.3 ± 1.4; p < 0.001, respectively). Three patients (> 25 to < 40 years) who received tadalafil 5 mg tablet showed muscle and back pain. Gastrointestinal (GIT) upset (eight patients) followed by headache (seven patients) were the main side effects reported in patients (40-55 years) who received tadalafil 5 mg tablet. While GIT upset was the main side effect reported in patients (> 55 years) who received tadalafil 5 mg tablet. CONCLUSION: ODF tadalafil 5 mg is an effective, tolerable, and safe formulation that can be used in patients with mild-to-moderate ED.
Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5 , Comprimidos , Tadalafila , Humanos , Tadalafila/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Administração Oral , Resultado do Tratamento , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Método Duplo-CegoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Despite significant advances in clinical care and understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, age-related macular degeneration (AMD)-a major cause of global blindness-lacks effective treatment to prevent the irreversible degeneration of photoreceptors leading to central vision loss. Limited studies suggest phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, such as sildenafil, may prevent AMD by increasing retinal blood flow. This study explores the potential association between sildenafil use and AMD risk in men with erectile dysfunction using UK data. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using the UK's IQVIA Medical Research Data, the study analysed 31 575 men prescribed sildenafil for erectile dysfunction and no AMD history from 2007 to 2015, matched with a comparator group of 62 155 non-sildenafil users in a 1:2 ratio, over a median follow-up of approximately three years. RESULTS: The primary outcome was the incidence of AMD in the two groups. The study found no significant difference in AMD incidence between the sildenafil users and the non-users, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.99 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.16), after accounting for confounders such as age, ethnicity, Townsend deprivation quintile, body mass index category, and diagnosis of hypertension and type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSION: The study results indicated no significant association between sildenafil use and AMD prevention in UK men with erectile dysfunction, suggesting sildenafil's protective effect on AMD is likely insignificant.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Disfunção Erétil , Degeneração Macular , Masculino , Humanos , Citrato de Sildenafila/efeitos adversos , Disfunção Erétil/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Degeneração Macular/induzido quimicamenteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) are the standard medical treatment for erectile dysfunction. Aim of our study was to evaluate the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) reported during PDE5i treatment based on Eudra-Vigilance (EV) reports. METHODS: EV database is the system for managing and analyzing data on suspected adverse reactions to medicines which have been authorized or being studied in clinical trials in the European Economic Area. MACE are defined as non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal congestive heart failure, revascularization after aorto-coronary graft bypass and cardiovascular death. We recorded the number of MACE for sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, avanafil per category and severity until 1st July 2023. Pooled Relative Risk (PRR) was used to compare data between drugs. RESULTS: Overall, 951 MACE events were reported. Most of them were observed in younger patients <65 years old (452/951 events, 48%). Overall, 377/8939 (4%) MACE events were observed for sildenafil, 221/5213 (4%) for tadalafil, 50/1029 (4%) for vardenafil and no events for avanafil. No significative differences were reported comparing sildenafil and tadalafil (PRR 0.71-0.99, IQR 0.61-1.35, P>0.05), neither sildenafil vs. vardenafil (PRR 0.68-0.79, IQR 0.43-1.55, P>0.05), neither tadalafil vs. vardenafil (PRR 0.77-0.95, IQR 0.64-1.30. P>0.05) even when compared for age. Comparison between different classes of age showed MACE were more frequent in patients younger than 65 years old taking sildenafil and tadalafil when compared to patients older than 85 years old (PRR 0.02-0.11. IQR 0.01-0.40. P<0.01) and when compared to patients in 65-85 class of age (PRR 0.02-0.12, IQR 0.01-0.95, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Real life data is consistent with MACE related to PDE5i. PDE5is are infrequently (<5%) associated with MACE. However, risk seems higher in younger patients, particularly for sildenafil (452/951 events, 48%). Clinicians should consider these data when prescribing PDE5i especially in young patients.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Bases de Dados Factuais , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5 , Humanos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Disfunção Erétil/induzido quimicamente , Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Disfunção Erétil/epidemiologia , Tadalafila/uso terapêutico , Tadalafila/efeitos adversos , Citrato de Sildenafila/efeitos adversos , Citrato de Sildenafila/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tadalafil is a long-acting phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE-5i) indicated for erectile dysfunction (ED). HYPOTHESIS: Our hypothesis was that tadalafil will reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, unstable angina, heart failure, stroke) and all-cause death in men with ED. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in a large US commercial insurance claims database in men with a diagnosis of ED without prior MACE within 1 year. The exposed group (n = 8156) had ≥1 claim for tadalafil; the unexposed group (n = 21 012) had no claims for any PDE-5i. RESULTS: Primary outcome was MACE; secondary outcome was all-cause death. Groups were matched for cardiovascular risk factors, including preventive therapy. Over a mean follow-up of 37 months for the exposed group and 29 months for the unexposed group, adjusted rates of MACE were 19% lower in men exposed to tadalafil versus those unexposed to any PDE-5i (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.70-0.94; p = .007). Tadalafil exposure was associated with lower adjusted rates of coronary revascularization (HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.52-0.90; p = .006); unstable angina (HR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.37-0.81; p = .003); and cardiovascular-related mortality (HR = 0.45; CI = 0.22-0.93; p = .032). Overall mortality rate was 44% lower in men exposed to tadalafil (HR = 0.56; CI = 0.43-0.74; p < .001). Men in the highest quartile of tadalafil exposure had the lowest rates of MACE (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.28-0.58; p < .001) compared to lowest exposure quartile. CONCLUSION: In men with ED, exposure to tadalafil was associated with significant and clinically meaningful lower rates of MACE and overall mortality.
Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Infarto do Miocárdio , Masculino , Humanos , Tadalafila/uso terapêutico , Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Disfunção Erétil/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carbolinas/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Infarto do Miocárdio/induzido quimicamente , Angina InstávelRESUMO
PURPOSE: There have been conflicting studies on the association between phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) use and biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP). Our aim was to determine whether PDE5i drug exposure after RP increases the risk of BCR in patients undergoing RP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An institutional database of prostate cancer patients treated between January 2009 and December 2020 was reviewed. BCR was defined as 2 PSA measurements greater than 0.1 ng/mL. PDE5i exposure was defined using a 0 to 3 scale, with 0 representing never use, 1 sometimes use, 2 regularly use, and 3 routinely use. The risk of BCR with any PDE5i exposure, the quantity of exposure, and the duration of PDE5i exposure were assessed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The sample size included 4630 patients to be analyzed, with 776 patients having BCR. The median follow-up for patients without BCR was 27 (IQR 12, 49) months. Eighty-nine percent reported taking a PDE5i at any time during the first 12 months after RP, and 60% reported doing so for 6 or more months during the year after RP. There was no evidence of an increase in the risk of BCR associated with any PDE5i use (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.84, 1.31, P = .7) or duration of PDE5i use in the first year (HR 0.98 per 1 month duration, 95% CI 0.96, 1.00, P = .055). Baseline oncologic risk was lower in patients using PDE5i, but differences between groups were small, suggesting that residual confounding is unlikely to obscure any causal association with BCR. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription of PDE5i to men after RP can be based exclusively on quality of life considerations. Patients receiving PDE5is can be reassured that their use does not increase the risk of BCR.