RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinical events such as angina pectoris, acute coronary syndrome, and sudden death caused by myocardial bridge (MB) have attracted increasing attention. It is still a challenge to diagnose whether MB can cause the symptoms of patients with MB. For most MB patients, medication remains the primary treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: This article reports a case of chest pain in a patient with MB in the middle segment of the left anterior descending artery (LADm) with moderate stenosis in the proximal segment (LADp). Through functional assessment, we found that neither MB nor fixed stenosis had sufficient effect on coronary blood flow to cause myocardial ischemia, but their synergistic effect resulted in myocardial ischemia. Finally, a stent was implanted in LADp and good clinical results were achieved. CONCLUSIONS: For symptomatic patients with MB combined with fixed stenosis, functional evaluation may be necessary, which has significant guiding significance for treatment strategy selection. For asymptomatic patients, early detection of myocardial ischemia may also improve the prognosis of patients.
Assuntos
Estenose Coronária , Ponte Miocárdica , Humanos , Estenose Coronária/fisiopatologia , Estenose Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose Coronária/terapia , Estenose Coronária/etiologia , Ponte Miocárdica/complicações , Ponte Miocárdica/fisiopatologia , Ponte Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Masculino , Stents , Angiografia Coronária , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Isquemia Miocárdica/fisiopatologia , Isquemia Miocárdica/etiologia , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico por imagem , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Idoso , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaAssuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Humanos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , StentsRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stent malapposition (SM) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for myocardial infarction continues to present significant clinical challenges. In recent years, machine learning (ML) models have demonstrated potential in disease risk stratification and predictive modeling. HYPOTHESIS: ML models based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, laboratory tests, and clinical characteristics can predict the occurrence of SM. METHODS: We studied 337 patients from the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, China, who had PCI and coronary OCT from May to October 2023. We employed nested cross-validation to partition patients into training and test sets. We developed five ML models: XGBoost, LR, RF, SVM, and NB based on calcification features. Performance was assessed using ROC curves. Lasso regression selected features from 46 clinical and 21 OCT imaging features, which were optimized with the five ML algorithms. RESULTS: In the prediction model based on calcification features, the XGBoost model and SVM model exhibited higher AUC values. Lasso regression identified five key features from clinical and imaging data. After incorporating selected features into the model for optimization, the AUC values of all algorithmic models showed significant improvements. The XGBoost model demonstrated the highest calibration accuracy. SHAP values revealed that the top five ranked features influencing the XGBoost model were calcification length, age, coronary dissection, lipid angle, and troponin. CONCLUSION: ML models developed using plaque imaging features and clinical characteristics can predict the occurrence of SM. ML models based on clinical and imaging features exhibited better performance.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Aprendizado de Máquina , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Placa Aterosclerótica , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/métodos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , China/epidemiologia , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Vasos Coronários/patologia , Idoso , Stents , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Medição de Risco/métodos , Angiografia CoronáriaAssuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Humanos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) provide similar results to drug-coated balloons (DCBs) but are inferior to drug-eluting stents (DES) at 1 year. However, the long-term efficacy of BVS in these patients remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of BVS in patients with ISR. METHODS: RIBS VI (Restenosis Intrastent: Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Treatment; NCT02672878) and RIBS VI Scoring (Restenosis Intrastent: Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Treatment With Scoring Balloon; NTC03069066) are prospective multicenter studies designed to evaluate the results of BVS in patients with ISR (N = 220). The inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical to those used in the RIBS IV (ISR of DES) (Restenosis Intra-stent of Drug-eluting Stents: Drug-eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-eluting Stent; NCT01239940) and RIBS V (ISR of bare-metal stents) (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-eluting Stent; NCT01239953) randomized trials (including 249 ISR patients treated with DCBs and 249 ISR patients treated with DES). A prespecified comparison of the long-term results obtained with these treatment modalities (ie, DES, DCBs, and BVS) was performed. RESULTS: Clinical follow-up at 3 years was obtained in all (100%) 718 patients. The 3-year target lesion revascularization rate after BVS was 14.1% (vs 12.9% after DCBs [not significant], and 5.2% after DES [HR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.47-5.36; P = 0.001]). In a landmark analysis (>1 year), the target lesion revascularization rate after BVS was higher than after DES (adjusted HR: 3.41; 95% CI: 1.15-10.08) and DCBs (adjusted HR: 3.33; 95% CI: 1.14-9.70). Very late vessel thrombosis was also more frequent with BVS (BVS: 1.8%, DCBs: 0.4%, DES: 0%; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, late clinical results of DES are superior to those obtained with DCBs and BVS. Beyond the first year, DCBs are safer and more effective than BVS.
Assuntos
Implantes Absorvíveis , Reestenose Coronária , Desenho de Prótese , Humanos , Fatores de Tempo , Masculino , Resultado do Tratamento , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Reestenose Coronária/etiologia , Reestenose Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Reestenose Coronária/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Fatores de Risco , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/instrumentação , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efeitos adversos , Stents , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Stents Farmacológicos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoAssuntos
Implantes Absorvíveis , Reestenose Coronária , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Desenho de Prótese , Humanos , Reestenose Coronária/etiologia , Reestenose Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Reestenose Coronária/terapia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de Risco , Stents Farmacológicos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Stents , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Few large-scale studies have evaluated the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technological advances in the treatment of patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (LM-CAD). We aim to identify independent factors that affect the prognosis of PCI in patients with unprotected LM-CAD and to assess the impact of PCI technological advances on long-term clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 4512 consecutive patients who underwent unprotected LM-CAD PCI at Fuwai Hospital from 2004 to 2016 were enrolled. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify which techniques can independently affect the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs; a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). The incidence of 3-year MACEs was 9.0% (406/4512). Four new PCI techniques were identified as the independent protective factors of MACEs, including second-generation drug-eluting stents (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61 [95% CI, 0.37-0.99]), postdilatation (HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.59-0.94]), final kissing balloon inflation (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.62-0.99]), and using intravascular ultrasound (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63-0.97]). The relative hazard of 3-year MACEs was reduced by ≈50% with use of all 4 techniques compared with no technique use (HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.32-0.87]). CONCLUSIONS: PCI technological advances including postdilatation, second-generation drug-eluting stent, final kissing balloon inflation, and intravascular ultrasound guidance were associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients who underwent unprotected LM-CAD PCI.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Stents Farmacológicos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/tendências , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , China/epidemiologia , Medição de RiscoAssuntos
Trombose Coronária , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Stents , Trombectomia , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Trombose Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose Coronária/terapia , Trombose Coronária/etiologia , Trombectomia/instrumentação , Masculino , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Remoção de Dispositivo , IdosoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the outcomes with limus drug-coated balloons (DCBs) vs paclitaxel DCBs were small and underpowered for clinical endpoints. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the angiographic and clinical outcomes with limus DCBs vs paclitaxel DCBs for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: An electronic search of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed through January 2024 for RCTs comparing limus DCBs vs paclitaxel DCBs for PCI. The primary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary endpoints were late angiographic findings. Summary estimates were constructed using a random effects model. RESULTS: Six RCTs with 821 patients were included; 446 patients received a limus DCB, and 375 patients received a paclitaxel DCB. There was no difference between limus DCBs and paclitaxel DCBs in the incidence of TLR at a mean of 13.4 months (10.3% vs 7.8%; risk ratio [RR]: 1.32; 95% CI: 0.84-2.08). Subgroup analysis suggested no significant interaction among studies for de novo coronary lesions vs in-stent restenosis (Pinteraction = 0.58). There were no differences in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiac mortality, or target vessel myocardial infarction between groups. However, limus DCBs were associated with a higher risk of binary restenosis (RR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.14-3.12), late lumen loss (mean difference = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.03-0.28), and a smaller minimum lumen diameter (mean difference = -0.12; 95% CI: -0.22 to -0.02) at late follow-up. In addition, late lumen enlargement occurred more frequently (50% vs 27.5%; RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.45-0.77) with paclitaxel DCBs. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing DCB-only PCI, there were no differences in the risk of clinically driven TLR and other clinical outcomes between limus DCBs and paclitaxel DCBs. However, paclitaxel DCBs were associated with better late angiographic outcomes. These findings support the need for future trials to establish the role of new-generation limus DCBs for PCI.
Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Cateteres Cardíacos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Paclitaxel , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/instrumentação , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/mortalidade , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efeitos adversos , Angiografia Coronária , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Reestenose Coronária/etiologia , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The success rate of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) is lower and the risk for complications higher compared with other non-CTO PCI. Although interventionalists focus on intimal plaque characteristics, the coronary media is an important (especially for techniques involving antegrade dissection and re-entry) but poorly understood structure in CTO PCI. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate coronary medial wall thinning in CTO lesions and determine how this thinning might affect CTO PCI. METHODS: A total of 2,586 sections were investigated, from arteries with evidence of CTO from 54 subjects (1,383 sections) and arteries without evidence of CTO from 54 subjects with non-coronary-related deaths (1,203 sections) after matching for age, gender, body weight, and body height. RESULTS: The medial thickness in subjects with CTO was lower than that in those with non-coronary-related death (P < 0.001). In subjects with CTO, CTO lesions had thinner medial walls compared with those with lower luminal narrowing (P < 0.001). At the CTO distal segments, the 6- to 12-mm distal segment from the distal end of the CTO had significantly less luminal narrowing (P < 0.001), and similar medial thickness, compared with the distal end of the CTO. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that short-duration CTO had more cleaved caspase-3-positive cells in media and had significantly more CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and CD4+CD28null T cells compared with long-duration CTO. CONCLUSIONS: CTO lesions demonstrated coronary medial thinning compared with non-CTO lesions. Further investigation of the cause-and-effect relationship among inflammation, apoptosis, and coronary medial wall thinning is warranted in future mechanistic studies.
Assuntos
Oclusão Coronária , Vasos Coronários , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Humanos , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/patologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Vasos Coronários/patologia , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Apoptose , Remodelação Vascular , Túnica Média/patologia , Túnica Média/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Angiografia CoronáriaAssuntos
Oclusão Coronária , Humanos , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/terapia , Oclusão Coronária/fisiopatologia , Doença Crônica , Resultado do Tratamento , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Masculino , Angiografia Coronária , Tomografia de Coerência ÓpticaRESUMO
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of calcified coronary arteries is associated with poor outcomes. Poorly modified calcified lesion hinders the stent delivery, disrupts drug-carrying polymer, impairs drug elution kinetics and results in under-expanded stent (UES). UES is the most common cause of acute stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis after PCI of calcified lesions. Angiography has poor sensitivity for recognition and quantification of coronary calcium, thereby mandating the use of intravascular imaging. Intravascular imaging, like intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography, has the potential to accurately identify and quantify the coronary calcium and to guide appropriate modification device before stent placement. Available options for the modification of calcified plaque include modified balloons (cutting balloon, scoring balloon and high-pressure balloon), atherectomy devices (rotational atherectomy and orbital atherectomy) and laser atherectomy. Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is the newest addition to the tool box for calcified plaque modification. It produces the acoustic shockwaves, which interact with the coronary calcium to cause multiplanar fractures. These calcium fractures increase the vessel compliance and result in desirable minimum stent areas. Coronary IVL has established its safety and efficacy for calcified lesion in series of Disrupt CAD trials. Its advantages over atherectomy devices include ease of use on workhorse wire, ability to modify deep calcium, no debris embolization causing slow flow or no-flow and minimal thermal injury. It is showing promising results in modification of difficult calcified lesion subsets such as calcified nodule, calcified left main bifurcation lesions and chronic total occlusion. In this review, authors will summarize the mechanism of action for IVL, its role in contemporary practice, evidence available for its use, its advantages over atherectomy devices and its imaging insight in different calcified lesion scenarios.
Shock the rock with coronary intravascular lithotripsyPresence of coronary calcium during stenting is associated with the risk of stent under expansion. It's imperative to adequately modify this coronary calcium before placing the stent. Till recent past, the most effective method for calcium modification is debulking it with rotational artherectomy, which is associated with the risk of coronary perforation, slow flow or abrupt vessel closure. Recently, a balloon-based lithotripsy device has established its safety and efficacy for treating such lesions. Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is an easy to use calcium modification device and is associated with almost negligible complications, when compared with artherectomy devices. In this review, we will discuss the mechanism of IVL action and its use in different scenarios of calcified coronary artery disease.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Litotripsia , Calcificação Vascular , Humanos , Litotripsia/efeitos adversos , Calcificação Vascular/terapia , Calcificação Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Stents , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Risco , Placa Aterosclerótica , Ultrassonografia de IntervençãoAssuntos
Angiografia Coronária , Reestenose Coronária , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Humanos , Reestenose Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Reestenose Coronária/terapia , Reestenose Coronária/etiologia , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/métodos , Masculino , Stents Farmacológicos , Resultado do Tratamento , Stents , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Desenho de Prótese , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , IdosoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are limited data about determinant factors of target lesion failure (TLF) in lesions after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using a drug-coated balloon (DCB) for de novo coronary artery lesions, including optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings. AIMS: The present study aims to investigate the associated factors of TLF in de novo coronary artery lesions with DCB treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 328 de novo coronary artery lesions in 328 patients who had undergone PCI with a DCB. All lesions had been treated without a stent, and both pre- and post-PCI OCT had been carried out. Patients were divided into two groups, with or without TLF, which was defined as a composite of culprit lesion-related cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularisation, and the associated factors of TLF were assessed. RESULTS: At the median follow-up period of 460 days, TLF events occurred in 31 patients (9.5%) and were associated with patients requiring haemodialysis (HD; 29.0% vs 10.8%), with a severely calcified lesion (median maximum calcium arc 215° vs 104°), and with the absence of OCT medial dissection (16.1% vs 60.9%) as opposed to those without TLF events. In Cox multivariable logistic regression analysis, HD (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-5.11; p=0.049), maximum calcium arc (per 90°, HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.05-1.72; p=0.02), and the absence of post-PCI medial dissection on OCT (HR: 8.24, 95% CI: 3.15-21.6; p<0.001) were independently associated with TLF. CONCLUSIONS: In de novo coronary artery lesions that received DCB treatment, factors associated with TLF were being on HD, the presence of a severely calcified lesion, and the absence of post-PCI medial dissection.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/instrumentação , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Stents Farmacológicos , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The DESyne novolimus-eluting coronary stent (NES) is a new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) that is widely used, but clinical data are rarely reported for this stent. We compared the safety and effectiveness of the DESyne NES and the Orsiro bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study. Between July 2017 and December 2022, patients who presented with chronic or acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI with DESyne NES or Orsiro SES were consecutively enrolled in the present study. The primary endpoint, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), was a composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target-lesion revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 776 patients (age 68.8 ± 12.2; 75.9% male) undergoing PCI were included. Overall, 231 patients with 313 lesions received NES and 545 patients with 846 lesions received SES. During a follow-up duration of 784 ± 522 days, the primary endpoint occurred in 10 patients (4.3%) in the NES group and in 36 patients (6.6%) in the SES group. After multivariate adjustment, the risk of MACE did not significantly differ between groups (NES vs. SES, hazard ratio 0.74, 95% CI, 0.35-1.55, p = 0.425). The event rate of individual components of the primary endpoint was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Favorable and similar clinical outcomes were observed in patients undergoing PCI with either NES or SES in a medium-term follow-up duration. Future studies with adequately powered clinical endpoints are required for further evaluation.
Assuntos
Stents Farmacológicos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Desenho de Prótese , Sirolimo , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Sirolimo/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Resultado do Tratamento , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Fatores de Tempo , Seguimentos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Fatores de Risco , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Angiografia Coronária , MacrolídeosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The treatment of resistant coronary lesions (RCL) is a great challenge for interventional cardiologists. The excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) is a plaque modification tool based on a main mechanism of photomechanical effect leading to mechanical disruption of the plaque. Contrast dye injection during laser delivery has demonstrated to enhance its power. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the contrast-enhanced ELCA by a stepwise approach in the treatment of RCLs. METHODS: We retrospectively examined consecutive patients undergoing contrast-enhanced ELCA-assisted PCI between 2018 and 2021 at two Italian sites. RCLs were defined as novo or in-stent undilatable/uncrossable with conventional balloons (SC/NC balloon). The primary endpoint was ELCA technical success defined as the laser catheter crossing the entire length of the target lesion established by angiographic evidence of the catheter tip in the artery distal to the stenosis. RESULTS: We enrolled 114 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced ELCA-assisted PCI: 58% of the patients had acute coronary syndrome while the left anterior descending artery was the target vessel in 42.1% of cases. The target lesion was most commonly in-stent (56.2%). The 0.9 mm ELCA catheter tip was employed in 89.5% of cases. The most used frequency/fluency profile was 70/70 (39.5%). The use of contrast-enhanced ELCA was associated with high technical, procedural, and clinical success rates (97.4%, 93.7%, and 90.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The contrast-enhanced ELCA seems to be a safe and effective treatment option for the management of both de novo and in-stent-resistant coronary lesions.
Assuntos
Aterectomia Coronária , Meios de Contraste , Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Lasers de Excimer , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Lasers de Excimer/uso terapêutico , Aterectomia Coronária/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Itália , Angiografia Coronária , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Stents , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the elderly people with unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often selected as first choice treatment strategy because of perioperative high risk of coronary artery bypass graft surgery due to their large number of comorbidities. Also, some recent papers reported that geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is also strongly associated with clinical outcomes after interventional procedures in elderly patients. OBJECTIVES: We assessed clinical outcomes after PCI for ULMD and the impact of GNRI in elderly patients. METHODS: We identified 669 non dialysis patients treated with current generation drug-eluting stent for ULMD from MITO registry. We divided the patients to the following 2 groups; elderly group (n = 240, age ≥75) and young group (n = 429, age <75). Additionally, we could calculate GNRI and divided elderly group into 2 group based on the median value of the GNRI. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: All-cause mortality was significantly higher in elderly group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.40-4.02; p = 0.001]. All-cause mortality was significantly higher in low GNRI elderly group compared to other 2 groups (Adjusted HR of elderly with low GNRI: 3.56, 95%CI (1.77-7.14), p < 0.001). Cardiovascular mortality was comparable between two groups. TLR rate was significantly lower in elderly group (adjusted HR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.97; p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The elderly had higher all-cause mortality after PCI for ULMD compared to young people. Especially, the elderly with low GNRI were extremely associated with poorer outcomes.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Stents Farmacológicos , Avaliação Geriátrica , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/mortalidade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Medição de Risco , Fatores Etários , Fatores de Tempo , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estado Nutricional , Estudos Retrospectivos , JapãoRESUMO
Microplastics (MPs) is an emerging pollutant potentially harmful to health. Medical practices using plastic devices, such as percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), may result in MPs entering into the blood. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of PCI on microplastic levels in patients' blood. Laser direct infrared (LDIR) was used to detect MPs in the blood of 23 patients before and after PCI. MPs in the water in which devices used in PCI were washed were also examined. The concentration of MPs in the blood was significantly elevated (93.57 ± 35.95 vs. 4.96 ± 3.40 particles/10 mL of blood, P < 0.001) after PCI compared to before, and the increased MPs were polyamide (PA), polyethylene (PE), polyurethane (PU), and polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which was consistent with the types of MPs detected in the device washing water. The maximum diameter of MPs in blood before PCI was 50 µm, whereas after PCI it was 213 µm, and even 336 µm in device washing water. These findings indicated that PCI will cause MPs to enter the blood, and devices used during PCI were a major source, a range of medical practices that use plastic devices may be a new route for MPs to enter the human body.