Alternate levels versus all levels mini-plate fixation in C3-6 cervical laminoplasty: a retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare radiological and clinical outcomes between alternate levels (C4 and C6) and all levels mini-plate fixation in C3-6 unilateral open-door laminoplasty. METHODS: Ninety-six patients who underwent C3-6 unilateral open-door laminoplasty with alternate levels mini-plate fixation (54 patients in group A) or all levels mini-plate fixation (42 patients in group B) between September 2014 and September 2019 were reviewed in this study. Radiologic and clinical outcomes were assessed. Clinical results included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of axial neck pain and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. Radiographic results included cervical range of motion (ROM), cervical curvature index (CCI), and the spinal canal expansive parameters including open angle, anteroposterior diameter (APD), and Pavlov`s ratio. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in VAS, JOA score, ROM, and CCI between two groups. There was no significant difference in canal expansion postoperatively between two groups. However, open angle, APD, and Pavlov`s ratio in group A decreased significantly during the follow-up. In group B, APD, Pavlov`s ratio, and open angle were maintained until the final follow-up. There was no hardware failure or lamina reclosure occurred in both groups during the follow-up. The mean cost of group B was higher than that of group A. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the differences in the maintenance of canal expansion, alternate levels mini-plate fixation can achieve similar clinical outcomes as all levels mini-plate fixation in C3-6 unilateral open-door laminoplasty. As evidenced in this study, we believe C3-6 laminoplasty with alternate levels (C4 and C6) mini-plate fixation is an economical, effective, and safe treatment method.

Two-level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion versus Posterior Open-door Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Comparison of the Clinical Impact on the Occipito-Atlantoaxial Complex.

OBJECTIVE: Both two-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (t-ACCF) and posterior open-door laminoplasty (ODLP) are effective surgical procedures for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Previous studies have identified different effects of different surgical procedures on the upper and subaxial cervical spine (UCS, SCS), however, there are no studies on the effects of t-ACCF and ODLP on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the changes in sagittal parameters and range of motion (ROM) of the occipito-atlantoaxial complex in OPLL patients treated with t-ACCF and ODLP. METHODS: This was a retrospective study that included 74 patients who underwent t-ACCF or ODLP for the treatment of OPLL from January 2012 to August 2022 at our institution. Preoperative, 3-month, and 1-year postoperative cervical neutral, flexion-extension, and lateral flexion radiographs were taken. Sagittal parameters including Cobb angle of C2-7, C0-2, C0-1, C1-2, C2 slope, and the ROM were measured. The clinical outcome was assessed using the JOA, VAS, and NDI scores preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Multiple linear regression was employed to identify factors influencing changes in UCS. RESULTS: In the ODLP group, the SCS (C2-7) Cobb angle was significantly reduced (12.85 ± 10.0 to 7.68 ± 11.27; p < 0.05), and the UCS (C0-2) Cobb angle was significantly compensated for at 1 year postoperatively compared with the t-ACCF group (3.05 ± 4.09 vs 0.79 ± 2.62; p < 0.01). The SCS and lateral flexion ROM of the ODLP group was better maintained than t-ACCF (14.51 ± 6.00 vs 10.72 ± 3.79; 6.87 ± 4.56 vs 3.81 ± 1.67; p < 0.01). The compensatory increase in C0-2, C0-1, and C1-2 ROM was pronounced in both groups, especially in the ODLP group. The results of multiple linear regression showed that only the surgical procedure was a significant factor influencing UCS. CONCLUSION: The loss of the SCS Cobb angle was more pronounced in ODLP relative to t-ACCF, resulting in a significant compensatory increase in UCS and atlantoaxial Cobb angle. The ROM of the UCS, atlantooccipital, and atlantoaxial joints was significantly increased in both groups, this may accelerate degenerative changes in the occipital-atlantoaxial complex, may leading to poorer outcomes in the long-term; of these, ODLP should receive more attention. In contrast, t-ACCF better maintains normal curvature of the SCS and occipito-atlantoaxial complex but loses more ROM.

The CT Classification of Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament to Guide Hybrid Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion vs. Posterior Laminoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: For precise and minimally invasive treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine, the lifting segment is minimized, anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) was refined and improved. In addition, the development of appropriate surgical procedures for the ossification of each segment was rarely reported. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of hybrid anterior controlled antedisplacement fusion (Hybrid ACAF) with laminoplasty for multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). METHODS: Between May 2018 and May 2021, 70 patients with multilevel OPLL were divided into a hybrid ACAF group and a laminoplasty group according to surgical methods. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and recovery rate (JOARR), (VAS, NDI) score and C2-C7 Cobb angle, the sagittal vertical axis of the neck (SVA), and complications (cerebrospinal fluid leakage, C5 paralysis, etc.) were compared between the two groups by t test or non-parametric test. RESULTS: The operation time of hybrid ACAF was longer. C5 paralysis and axial pain were more common in the laminoplasty group, while dysphagia and hoarseness were more common in the hybrid ACAF group. At the last follow-up, the hybrid ACAF group had better recovery and maintenance of cervical lordosis and sagittal plane balance and a higher JOA score and recovery rate than the laminoplasty group. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid ACAF can reduce the number of vertebral bodies and expand the decompression range, which is safe, effective, and tailored to local conditions. Compared with laminoplasty, hybrid ACAF is a precise alternative for patients with OPLL.

Greater cervical kyphosis during flexion increases the risk of kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Kyphotic deformity following the loss of cervical lordosis can lead to unfavourable neurological recovery after cervical laminoplasty (CLP); therefore, it is essential to identify its risk factors. Recent studies have demonstrated that the dynamic parameters of the cervical spine, based on baseline flexion/extension radiographs, are highly useful to estimate the loss of cervical lordosis after CLP. However, it remains unclear whether such dynamic parameters can predict kyphotic deformity development after CLP. Hence, the present study aimed to investigate whether the dynamic parameters could predict kyphotic deformity in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) after CLP. This retrospective study included 165 patients, consisting of 10 and 155 patients with and without cervical kyphosis of C2-C7 angle ≤ -10° at the final follow-up period, respectively. Among the static and dynamic parameters of the cervical spine, greater cervical kyphosis during flexion (fC2-C7 angle) demonstrated the best discrimination between these two cohorts, with an optimal cutoff value of -27.5°. Meanwhile, greater gap range of motion (gROM = flexion ROM - extension ROM ) had the highest ability to predict a loss of ≥ 10° in C2-C7 angle after CLP, with an optimal cutoff value of 28.5°. This study suggests that in patients with CSM, fC2-C7 angle ≤ -25° on baseline radiographs is a potential risk for kyphotic deformity after CLP. In clinical practice, the patients with this criterion (fC2-C7 angle ≤ -25°) along with gROM ≥ 30° are at high risk of developing significant kyphotic deformity after CLP.

Change of cervical flexion range of motion influences postoperative sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The relationships between preoperative cervical spine range of motion (ROM) and postoperative cervical sagittal alignment (CSA), and clinical outcomes after laminoplasty (LMP) have been widely studied. However, the impact of ROM changes on postoperative CSA and clinical outcomes after LMP remains unclear. Herein, patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) were retrospectively analyzed to explore the association between postoperative cervical ROM changes and CSA and surgical outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent cervical LMP at our hospital between January 2019 to June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. CSA parameters were measured before the surgery and at the final follow-up. Loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) was defined as preoperative cervical lordosis (CL) - postoperative CL. An increase in the cervical sagittal vertical axis (I-cSVA) was defined as postoperative cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) - preoperative cSVA. We defined the changes in cervical flexion range of motion (△Flex ROM, preoperative Flex ROM minus postoperative Flex ROM) > 10° as L- Flex ROM group, and △Flex ROM ≤ 10° as S- Flex ROM group. Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analog score (VAS) were used to assess the surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The study comprised 74 patients and the average follow-up period was 31.83 months. CL, total ROM, and Flex ROM decreased and cSVA increased after cervical LMP. LCL and I-cSVA were positively correlated with △Flex. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that a decrease in the Flex ROM was a risk factor for LCL and I-cSVA after LMP. LCL and I-cSVA were higher in the L-Flex ROM group than in the S-Flex ROM group. Postoperative JOA and the JOA recovery rate were worse in the L-Flex ROM group than in the S-Flex ROM group. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical total and Flex ROM decreased after cervical LMP. The reduction of Flex ROM was associated with LCL and I-cSVA after surgery. The preservation of cervical Flex ROM helps maintain CSA after LMP. Therefore, more attention should be paid to maintaining cervical ROM to obtain good CSA and surgical effects after cervical LMP.

Hidden blood loss in unilateral open-door cervical laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the hidden blood loss (HBL) and its possible risk factors after unilateral open-door cervical laminoplasty (UOCL) in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2018 and March 2023, a total of 105 patients (55 males, 50 females; median age: 76 years; range, 52 to 93 years) who underwent C3-7 UOCL for MCSM were retrospectively analyzed. Data of the patients were recorded, including age, sex, height, weight, plasma albumin, blood glucose, hematocrit, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, surgical time, and intraoperative blood loss. The HBL was calculated according to the Sehat formula, and risk factors were identified. RESULTS: The median surgical time was 180.7 min. The median total blood loss (TBL) and median HBL were 507.4 mL and 201.7 mL, respectively. Correlation analyses revealed that body mass index and surgical time were correlated with HBL (p<0.05). However, multiple linear regression analysis showed that HBL was positively correlated with surgical time (ß=0.293, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study results showed that surgical time is an independent risk factor for HBL. Therefore, HBL should not be overlooked in patients with MCSM undergoing UOCL, particularly in the patients with expected long surgical time.

Comparative Analysis of Postoperative Sagittal Balance in Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty versus Laminectomy with Fusion for Multilevel Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND This single-center study included 80 patients with multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and aimed to compare postoperative sagittal balance following treatment with expansive open-door laminoplasty (LP) vs total laminectomy with fusion (LF). MATERIAL AND METHODS Data of 80 patients with multilevel OPLL treated with LP vs LF between January 2017 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The basic data, cervical sagittal parameters, and clinical outcomes of the patients were counted in the preoperative and postoperative periods, and complications were recorded. Forty patients underwent LP and 40 underwent LF. Cervical sagittal parameters were compared between and within the 2 groups. Clinical outcomes and complications were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS At last follow-up, the postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angel, T1 slope (T1S), and C7 slope (C7S) were significantly higher in the LF group than in the LP group (P<0.001). C2-C7 SVA (cSVA) was slightly higher in the LF group (P>0.05) and significantly higher in the LP group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the LP group was significantly lower than in the LF group (P=0.02). The postoperative scores on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) were significantly improved in both groups (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Both procedures had good outcomes in neurological improvement. After posterior surgery, the cervical vertebrae all showed a tilting forward. Compared to LP, LF may change cervical balance in Cobb angel, T1S. LF has better efficacy in improving cervical lordosis compared with LP. Patients with high T1 slope after surgery may has more axial pain.

Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Image Reformation for Comparison of Foraminal Cross-Sectional Dimension in Patients Who Have Undergone Laminoplasty and Laminectomy with Fusion.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Laminectomy with fusion (LF) is commonly performed with laminoplasty (LP) for cervical myelopathy. Foraminal stenosis is important in the surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy. LF and LP can affect foraminal size in different ways. This study aimed to compare foraminal dimensions after LF and LP using a medical computer-assisted design (CAD) program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans of the cervical vertebrae of 16 patients with cervical myelopathy were retrospectively viewed in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format on a CAD program. CT images were reformatted in an oblique plane perpendicular to the long axis of each foramen from C2-C3 to C6-C7. The narrowest foraminal crosssectional dimension (FCD) was measured and compared between the LF and LP groups at the operated, non-operated, and C4-C5 levels. The difference between the preoperative and postoperative FCDs was also calculated and compared between the operated and C4-C5 levels. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities for FCD measurements were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: At the operated spinal levels, the LF and LP groups showed decreased and increased mean FCDs, respectively. At the adjacent non-operated levels, the mean FCD slightly increased in both the groups. In the LF group, the difference between the preoperative and postoperative FCDs in the C4-C5 levels was larger than that in the other operated levels, but this difference was insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: LF and LP showed contrary results for FCD. Therefore, FCD and kyphosis should be considered for LF and LP. KEY WORDS: three-dimensional, foraminal cross-sectional dimension, laminoplasty, laminectomy fusion, computer-aided design, drafting system, preoperative-postoperative comparison.

Comparison of Laminectomy with Fusion and Laminoplasty Treating Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: Comparing laminectomy with fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) for treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) and comparative analysis of neck pain and sagittal cervical parameters. METHODS: This single-center study retrospectively analyzed MCSM patients treated with LF or LP in our department between June 2018 and January 2023, with at least a 12-month follow-up. T-tests were used to identify operation time, hemoglobin, hospital stay, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, C2-C7 Cobb angle, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope, cervical range of motion (cROM), and C4/5 anterior and posterior spinal canal diameter (A-P diameter) and area. Nonparametric tests were used to identify visual analog scale (VAS) score (assessing neck pain). Pearson correlation analyses were used to identify the neck pain. RESULTS: Of all 67 patients (LF: 24, LP: 43), both groups' mJOA scores significantly improved (P < 0.001). The VAS scores had both significantly decreased, with the LF group exhibiting a more marked reduction (LF: P < 0.001, LP: P = 0.037). Both groups' C4/5 A-P diameters and areas increased significantly (P < 0.001). The cROM had both significantly decreased, with the LF group exhibiting a greater reduction. At the last follow-up, the LF group's T1 slope and C2-C7 Cobb angle considerably increased, and pain VAS scores substantially correlated with the C2-C7 Cobb angle (R = -0.451, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LF and LP were efficacious for MCSM. LF relieved neck pain better but caused greater reduction in cervical mobility. Cervical lordosis improvement was significantly correlated with neck pain alleviation.

Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes of cervical laminoplasty versus lateral mass screw fixation in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare cervical sagittal parameters and clinical outcomes between patients undergoing cervical laminoplasty(CL) and those undergoing lateral mass screw fixation(LMS). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 67 patients with multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the cervical spine who underwent lateral mass screw fixation (LMS = 36) and cervical laminoplasty (CL = 31). We analyzed cervical sagittal parameters (C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA), C0-2 Cobb angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, C7 slope (C7s), T1 slope (T1s), and spino-cranial angle (SCA)) and clinical outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS], neck disability index [NDI], Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] scores, recovery rate (RR), and minimum clinically significant difference [MCID]). The cervical sagittal parameters at the last follow-up were analyzed by binary logistic regression. Finally, we analyzed the correlation between the cervical sagittal parameters and each clinical outcome at the last follow-up after surgery in both groups. RESULTS: At the follow-up after posterior decompression in both groups, the mean values of C2-C7 SVA, C7s, and T1s in the LMS group were more significant than those in the CL group (P ≤ 0.05). Compared with the preoperative period, C2-C7 SVA, T1s, and SCA gradually increased, and the C2-C7 Cobb angle gradually decreased after surgery (P < 0.05). The improvement in the JOA score and the recovery rate was similar between the two groups, while the improvement in the VAS-N score and NDI score was more significant in the CL group (P = 0.001; P = 0.043). More patients reached MCID in the CL group than in the LMS group (P = 0.036). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that SCA was independently associated with whether patients reached MCID at NDI postoperatively. SCA was positively correlated with cervical NDI and negatively correlated with cervical JOA score at postoperative follow-up in both groups (P < 0.05); C2-7 Cobb angle was negatively correlated with cervical JOA score at postoperative follow-up (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: CL may be superior to LMS in treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy caused by OPLL. In addition, smaller cervical SCA after posterior decompression may suggest better postoperative outcomes.

Surgical Outcomes of Extensive Dome-Like Laminoplasty Using En Bloc Resection of C2 Inner Lamina for Patients With Severe Cord Compression Behind C2 Body.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, single-center study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a newly developed extensive dome-like laminoplasty using en bloc resection of the C2 inner lamina in patients with severe cord compression behind the C2 body. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A surgery for severe cord compression behind C2 body is challenging for spinal surgeons. To date, there has been no established solution for severe cord compression behind the C2 body. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with severe cord compression behind the C2 body who underwent posterior surgery consecutively were enrolled. Extensive dome-like laminoplasty that was newly developed was performed to remove en bloc removal of the C2 inner lamina were performed. Preoperative and postoperative canal diameters behind the C2 and mean removed area of the C2 inner lamina were measured using MRI and CT scan. Clinical and radiographic parameters were assessed preoperative and postoperative periods. In addition, perioperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients underwent extensive dome-like laminoplasty and their diagnoses were ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL, 66.7%) and congenital stenosis with spondylosis (33.3%). The mean canal diameter behind the C2 increased from 9.85 (2.28) mm preoperatively to 19.91 (3.93) mm at the last follow-up ( P <0.001). Clinically, neck and arm visual analog scale, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and neck disability index significantly improved at postoperative 1 month ( P <0.05), and the scores were maintained until the last follow-up. No meaningful radiographic changes occurred after the surgeries. During the procedures, there were no particular complications, but one patient showed deteriorated myelopathic symptoms and underwent additional C1-C2 decompressive surgery. CONCLUSIONS: After extensive dome-like laminoplasty, surgical outcomes are satisfactory, and complications are rare. This technique may be a viable option for patients with severe cord compression behind the C2 body. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy With Fusion in Patients With Cervical Spondylosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate preoperative differences in racial and socioeconomic factors in patients undergoing laminoplasty (LP) versus laminectomy and fusion (LF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DCM is prevalent in the United States, requiring surgical intervention to prevent neurological degeneration. While LF is utilized more frequently, LP is an emerging alternative. Previous studies have demonstrated similar neurological outcomes for both procedures. However, treatment selection is primarily at the discretion of the surgeon and may be influenced by social determinants of health that impact surgical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Quality Outcome Database (QOD), a national spine registry, was queried for adult patients who underwent either LP or LF for the management of DCM. Covariates associated with socioeconomic status, pain and disability, and demographic and medical history were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess patient factors associated with undergoing LP versus LF. RESULTS: Of 1673 DCM patients, 157 (9.4%) underwent LP and 1516 (90.6%) underwent LF. A significantly greater proportion of LP patients had private insurance (P<0.001), a greater than high school level education (P<0.001), were employed (P<0.001), and underwent primary surgery (P<0.001). LP patients reported significantly lower baseline neck/arm pain and Neck Disability Index (P<0.001). In the multivariate regression model, lower baseline neck pain [odds ratio (OR)=0.915, P=0.001], identifying as non-Caucasian (OR=2.082, P<0.032), being employed (OR=1.592, P=0.023), and having a greater than high school level education (OR=1.845, P<0.001) were associated with undergoing LP rather than LF. CONCLUSIONS: In DCM patients undergoing surgery, factors associated with patients undergoing LP versus LF included lower baseline neck pain, non-Caucasian race, higher education, and employment. While symptomatology may influence the decision to choose LP over LF, there may also be socioeconomic factors at play. The trend of more educated and employed patients undergoing LP warrants further investigation.

Comparison of anterior cervical diskectomy with fusion (ACDF) and laminoplasty treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy with developmental canal stenosis: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical effectiveness and radiologic results of anterior cervical diskectomy with fusion (ACDF) comparing with laminoplasty (LP) in treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) with developmental canal stenosis (DCS). METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 41 patients who had MCSM with DCS treated with ACDF or LP from December 2018 to April 2023. Patients were split into ACDF and LP groups for comparison, and patients were further separated into subgroups based on whether or not a reserving canal space was present. The operation time, hemoglobin, hospital stay, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, and visual analog scale (VAS) score were used to assess clinical efficacy. The C2-C7 Cobb angle, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope, and cervical range of motion were applied to evaluate imaging changes. RESULTS: Of the 41 patients, 19 received ACDF, and 22 received LP. At the final follow-up, both groups' mJOA scores significantly improved, and the intercomparison showed no differences; the VAS score was much lower in the ACDF group but remained unchanged in the LP group. At the final follow-up, the C2-C7 Cobb angle and T1 slope had significantly increased in the ACDF group, while the LP group showed no change; the cervical range of motion had significantly decreased in both groups, with the ACDF group exhibiting a more marked reduction. Within the ACDF subgroup, there was no postoperative symptom improvement for those with reserving space, whereas there was postoperative symptom resolution for those with non-reserving space; however, postoperative symptom in the LP subgroup was resolved. CONCLUSIONS: Both ACDF and LP were efficacious for MCSM patients with DCS. While ACDF could improve cervical lordosis and alleviate neck pain more effectively, it can also result in cervical sagittal imbalance and decreased mobility. Furthermore, the recovery from LP was superior to that from ACDF for patients with reserving space. In contrast, the recovery from both decompression techniques was comparable for individuals in non-reserving space.

What is the Preferable Method for the C3 and C7 Segments in Unilateral Open-Door Laminoplasty for Patients Diagnosed with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

BACKGROUND: Traditional C3-C7 unilateral open-door laminoplasty (UOLP) often leads to various postoperative complications as a result of damage of cervical posterior muscles and nuchal ligaments. We aimed to thoroughly evaluate postoperative outcomes after our modified UOLP versus traditional UOLP in treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). METHODS: Seventy-six patients with MCSM who underwent the modified UOLP with C3 laminectomy and C7 upper hemilaminectomy (40 patients) or traditional C3-C7 UOLP (36 patients) were included. Preoperative and postoperative cervical radiologic parameters, as well as clinical and surgical outcomes, were evaluated. RESULTS: Postoperatively, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores improved significantly more in the modified UOLP group than in the traditional UOLP group (P = 0.028), whereas visual analog scale scores and Neck Disability Index improved similarly in both groups. Follow-up scores for Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale were not significantly different between the 2 groups. At the final follow-up, the C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis and T1 slope increased in the traditional UOLP group and did not change in the modified UOLP group and were unchanged in the modified UOLP group. The C2-C7 Cobb angle decreased significantly in the traditional UOLP group and did not change in the modified UOLP group. The modified UOLP group lost less cervical posterior muscle area compared with the traditional UOLP group (3.72% ± 3.54% vs. 6.67% ± 2.81%; P < 0.001). The range of motion in the modified UOLP group was significantly greater than in the traditional UOLP group at the final follow-up (P < 0.001). Also, the modified UOLP group experienced a notable reduction in operative time, blood loss volume, and postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend performing our modified UOLP with C3 laminectomy and C7 upper hemilaminectomy instead of traditional C3-C7 UOLP.

Incidence and Risk Factors for the Development of Axial Symptoms Following Posterior Single-Door Laminoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Posterior single-door laminoplasty is a widely practiced clinical procedure, but the occurrence of postoperative axial syndrome (AS) remains a significant concern. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with AS and develop a risk prediction model. METHODS: Clinical data from 226 patients who underwent posterior single-door laminoplasty between June 2017 and June 2022 were collected. Through Logistic model analysis, the risk factors of AS are clarified and the intensity of each risk factor is explained in the form of forest plot. Subsequently, we constructed a predictive model and plotted receiver operating characteristic curves to assess the model's predictive value. RESULTS: In the end, 87 cases were diagnosed with AS, resulting in an incidence rate of 38.5%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative encroachment rate of anterior spinal canal (pre-op ERASC), intraoperative facet joints destruction, intraoperative open-door angle, postoperative loss of cervical curvature, and postoperative loss of cervical range of motion were independent risk factors for AS. Conversely, preoperative cervical curvature (pre-op CC) and postoperation early function training were protective factors against AS. The Youden index indicated that the cutoff values for pre-op ERASC and pre-op CC were 26.6°and 16.5, respectively. The risk prediction model for AS was constructed and a nomogram was plotted. The model has high clinical value. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-op ERASC, pre-op CC, intraoperative facet joints destruction, intraoperative open-door angle, postoperative loss of cervical curvature, postoperative loss of cervical range of motion, and postoperation early function training are independent influencing factors for AS occurrence. The risk model has good practicability.

What Happens to Sagittal Alignment Following Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy and Fusion?

OBJECTIVE: Laminectomy and fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) are 2 sucessful posterior decompression techniques for cervical myelo-radiculopathy. There is also a growing body of evidence describing the importance of cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) and its importance in outcomes. We investigated the difference between pre- and postoperative CSA parameters in and between LF or LP. Furthermore, we studied predictive variables associated with change in cervical mismatch (CM). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of adults with cervical myeloradiculopathy in a single healthcare system. The primary outcomes are intra- and inter-cohort comparison of LF versus LP radiographic parameters at pre- and postoperative time points. A secondary multivariable analysis of predictive factors was performed evaluating factors predicting postoperative CM. RESULTS: Eighty nine patients were included; 38 (43%) had LF and 51 (57%) underwent LP. Both groups decreased in lordosis (LF 11.4° vs. 4.9°, P = 0.01; LP 15.2° vs. 9.1°, P < 0.001), increased in cSVA (LF 3.4 vs. 4.2 cm, P = 0.01; LP 3.2 vs. 4.2 cm, P < 0.001), and increased in CM (LF 22.0° vs. 28.5°, P = 0.02; LP 16.8° vs. 22.3°, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the postoperative CSA between groups. No significant predictors of change in pre- and postoperative CM were found. CONSLUSIONS: There were no significant pre-or postoperative differences following the 2 procedures, suggesting radiographic equipoise in well indicated patients. Across all groups, lordosis decreased, cSVA increased, and cervical mismatch increased. There were no predictive factors that led to change in cervical mismatch.

Clinical outcome of surgical management of mild cervical compressive myelopathy based on minimum clinically important difference.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Cervical compressive myelopathy (CCM), caused by cervical spondylosis (cervical spondylotic myelopathy [CSM]) or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), is a common neurological disorder in the elderly. For moderate/severe CCM, surgical management has been the first-line therapeutic option. Recently, surgical management is also recommended for mild CCM, and a few studies have reported the surgical outcome for this clinical population. Nonetheless, the present knowledge is insufficient to determine the specific surgical outcome of mild CCM. PURPOSE: To examine the surgical outcomes of mild CCM while considering the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent subaxial cervical surgery for CCM caused by CSM and OPLL between 2013 and 2022 were enrolled. OUTCOME MEASURES: The Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA score) was employed as the clinical outcomes. Based on previous reports, the JOA score threshold to determine mild myelopathic symptoms was set at ≥14.5 points, and the MCID of the JOA score for mild CCM was set at 1 point. METHODS: The patients with a JOA score of ≥14.5 points at baseline were stratified into the mild CCM and were examined while considering the MCID. The mild CCM cohort was dichotomized into the improvement group, including the patients with an achieved MCID (JOA score ≥1 point) or with a JOA score of 17 points (full mark) at 1 year postoperatively, and the nonimprovement group, including the others. Demographics, symptomatology, radiographic findings, and surgical procedure were compared between the two groups and studied using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Of 335 patients with CCM, 43 were stratified into the mild CCM cohort (mean age, 58.5 years; 62.8% male). Among them, 25 (58.1 %) patients were assigned to the improvement group and 18 (41.9 %) were assigned to the nonimprovement group. The improvement group was significantly younger than the nonimprovement group; however, other variables did not significantly differ. ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff point of the patient's age to discriminate between the improvement and nonimprovement groups was 58 years with an area under the curve of 0.702 (p=.015). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the majority of patients with mild CCM experienced improvement reaching the MCID of JOA score at 1 year postoperatively. The present study suggests that for younger patients with mild CCM, especially those aged below 58 years, subjective neurological recovery is more likely to be obtained. Meanwhile, the surgery takes on a more prophylactic significance to halt disease progression for older patients. The results of this study can help in the decision-making process for this clinical population.

Laminoplasty in Motion: Evolving Techniques and Complications.

Cervical laminoplasty is an increasingly popular surgical option for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Over the past few decades, there have been substantial developments in both surgical technique and hardware options. As the field of cervical surgery rapidly evolves, there is a timely need to reassess the evolving complications associated with newer techniques. This review aims to synthesize the available literature on cervical laminoplasty and associated mechanical complications pertaining to different laminoplasty hinge fixation options.