Seven-year refractive outcomes comparing small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism.

This study aimed to compare the seven-year refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. This retrospective cohort study included 97 eyes of 53 patients who had undergone SMILE or FS-LASIK for myopia seven years prior. Measured parameters included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and manifest refraction. There were no significant differences between the SMILE and FS-LASIK groups in logMAR UDVA, cylinder, and logMAR CDVA at 7 years postoperatively (P>0.05). However, there were significant differences between the two groups in sphere and spherical equivalent (P=0.035 and P=0.016, respectively). UDVA was better than or equal to 20/20 in 81% of the eyes after SMILE and in 63% after FS-LASIK (P = 0.045). The efficacy indices of the SMILE and FS-LASIK groups were 1.04 ± 0.23 and 0.97 ± 0.23 (P=0.405), and the safety indices were 1.18 ± 0.19 and 1.10 ± 0.17 (P=0.543), respectively. This study demonstrates the good predictivity of both SMILE and FS-LASIK. SMILE could offer superior refractive outcomes than FS-LASIK during a 7-year follow-up in correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery in a cataract patient with low vaulted ICL following LASIK: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Apart from the conventional utilization of ICL implantation for the correction of refractive errors, its recent applications extend to correcting refractive errors post laser refractive surgery. Notably, the development of cataracts stands out as a prevalent postoperative complication, often associated with low vault. Previous cases have demonstrated successful management of cataracts with ICL through the combination of FLACS and ICL removal coupled with IOL implantation, resulting in favorable postoperative visual outcomes. Herein, we present a case of cataract with low vault ICL following LASIK and its subsequent management. CASE PRESENTATION: A 46-year-old male presented with vision loss in the right eye for 9 months, and he had undergone LASIK 22 years prior and had ICL implantation in both eyes 2 years ago to correct refractive error. One day after ICL implantation, both eyes exhibited the UDVA of 1.2 and 1.0, well-positioned ICLs, and approximate vault of 150 µm and 200 µm. Six months ago, the patient became aware of blurred vision in the right eye for a duration of 3 months. Examination revealed cloudy lens cortex in the right eye. During the current review, the UDVA of the right eye was 0.6, where nasal wedge-shaped clouding was evident and worsened, while the left eye lens remained transparent. AS-OCT demonstrated the vault of 54 µm in the right eye and 83 µm in the left eye. Considering the patient's history of LASIK and the presence of right eye cataract, a monovision approach was adopted. The patient underwent FLACS combined with ICL extraction and monofocal IOL lens implantation in the right eye. At 10 days postoperatively, the patient exhibited the UDVA of 1.0. CONCLUSIONS: Our report confirms the feasibility of FLACS in managing cataracts in patients with low vault ICL following LASIK. This procedure does not pose significantly greater challenges than in typical cataract cases, although meticulous care remains essential throughout every step of the surgery, particularly during laser scanning and positioning. With adequate preoperative preparation and precise calculation of the IOL power, surgical outcomes can meet expectations fully.

Clinical safety and efficacy of elliptical thin-flap LASIK using a low-pulse energy femtosecond laser.

This study assessed the clinical safety and efficacy of elliptical thin-flap LASIK with a low-pulse energy femtosecond laser in 3 thickness subgroups (85, 90, and 100 µm). A total of 80 patients who underwent bilateral LASIK surgery at Taiwan between April and September 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Elliptical corneal flaps with wide temporal hinges and inverted-angled side cuts were created. Target flap thickness was calculated on the basis of residual stromal bed thickness and percent tissue altered. Before flap creation, an optical coherence tomography image for visualization of the precut flap position was obtained with the built-in camera. At postoperative month 1, the overall mean logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was - 0.04 ± 0.07 (20/18 Snellen), with 96% of eyes achieving UDVA of 20/20 or better. Postoperative mean manifest spherical equivalent was - 0.37 ± 0.42 D at 1 month. The visual and refractive outcomes in each of the 3 subgroups were similar. The achieved flap thicknesses were found to be highly predictable and consistent in the respective thickness subgroups. Optical coherence tomography-guided thin-flap LASIK performed with the low-pulse energy femtosecond laser was found to be safe with no intraoperative or postoperative complications.

Corneal Epithelial Remodeling Following Cylinder Correction With SMILE or FS-LASIK: A Contralateral Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the corneal epithelial remodeling in eyes with high astigmatism that had small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). METHODS: Seventy-four patients with myopic astigmatism of greater than -2.00 diopters (D) and little binocular difference in spherical equivalent were included in this contralateral comparative study. All patients received SMILE in one eye and FS-LASIK in the other eye randomly. The corneal epithelial remodeling pattern was mapped using the latest RTVue spectral-domain optical coherence tomographer (Optovue) by region. RESULTS: Satisfactory refractive correction was achieved in all enrolled eyes with either SMILE or FS-LASIK. The corneal epithelium gradually thickened following surgical cylinder correction, distributing mainly along the flat medium. The corneal epithelium proliferation is milder centrally but more pronounced in the mid-peripheral area after SMILE, compared with FS-LASIK. The flat-steep difference in corneal epithelial thickness (CET) is evident in the mid-peripheral and peripheral areas, which is more obvious in SMILE. Residual cylinder was positively correlated with CET in eyes that had FS-LASIK, but not SMILE. More importantly, these epithelial changes were positively correlated with the ablation depth and higher order aberrations following surgical refractive correction. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative CET map varied between SMILE and FS-LASIK. In eyes with high astigmatism, SMILE surgery is followed by milder and more stable corneal epithelial thickening. Moreover, the corneal epithelium is sensitive to stromal ablation and corneal remodeling is crucial to the postoperative visual quality. This study rigorously distinguished the CET difference between SMILE and FS-LASIK in astigmatic eyes and shed light on subsequent research. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(10);e728-e741.].

Refractive Coupling Effects in Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Procedures: A Machine Learning-Assisted Approach.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of refractive couplings in myopia and myopic astigmatism with two different keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) systems. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of refractive outcomes with two different lasers studying 2,841 eyes undergoing small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) (VisuMax 500; Carl Zeiss Meditec) and 2,528 eyes undergoing SmartSight (ATOS; SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH). Coupling effects (derived from the ratio between partial slopes) were determined for sphere and cylinder and for spherical equivalent, cardinal, and oblique astigmatism separately. RESULTS: Statistically significant coupling effects were observed for both the VisuMax and ATOS systems, as indicated by P values less than .05. For the VisuMax, a coupling effect of 8% of cylinder into sphere and a 2% coupling of sphere into cylinder was found. For the ATOS, the coupling effect of sphere into cylinder was 1%. A 3% coupling effect of oblique astigmatism into cardinal astigmatism in the VisuMax, and conversely, a 0.1% coupling effect of defocus into oblique astigmatism in the ATOS were found. In cases with no astigmatism plan, sphere had a 2% effect on induced astigmatism in the VisuMax and 0.6% in the ATOS. In high astigmatism plans, sphere had a significant 16% impact on cylinder in the VisuMax. Additionally, the effect of defocus on cardinal astigmatism was 6% in the VisuMax and 0.8% on oblique astigmatism in the ATOS. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the P values less than .05 indicating statistical significance, the observed coupling effects were consistently low, with magnitudes below 10%, even for astigmatism exceeding 2.50 diopters. These couplings may be partly attributed to cross-effects of torsional eye movements. Coupling values for KLEx were markedly lower than those reported for non-aspheric excimer laser ablations. The results suggest that surgical results may be refined further by optimizing nomograms to mitigate coupling effects. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(10):e706-e715.].

Photorefractive Keratectomy: Technical Evolution, Refractive Outcomes, Corneal Wound Healing Response, and Complications.

Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was the first excimer laser procedure developed to treat refractive errors. The safety and efficacy of PRK established it as one of the most performed corneal refractive procedures worldwide. With the introduction of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and more recently keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) procedures, many corneal surgeons favor these newer corneal procedures as the first choice due to faster visual rehabilitation and less discomfort during the early postoperative period. Importantly, however, PRK remains a viable alternative for most corneal refractive candidates and there are many situations in which PRK remains the refractive procedure of choice. This review addresses the technical evolution of PRK-mechanical epithelial debridement versus alcohol-assisted epithelial removal versus excimer laser-assisted epithelial debridement (transepithelial) PRK-and reports the PRK refractive outcomes compared to other keratorefractive laser procedures. The corneal wound response associated with each PRK technique and the indications, limitations, and complications of PRK are reviewed to aid refractive surgeons to best position PRK in their overall practice. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(10):e754-e767.].

Clinical Performance of an Extended Range of Vision Intraocular Lens After LASIK.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) of cataract surgery with implantation of a wavefront-shaping extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) in eyes with previous laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia correction. METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled 50 eyes with previous LASIK from 25 patients (age: 46 to 70 years) who underwent cataract surgery with implantation of the AcrySof IQ Vivity IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc). Visual and refractive outcomes were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up. PROMs were evaluated with the Intraocular Lens Satisfaction (IOLSAT; Alcon Vision, LLC) (general satisfaction), Catquest-9SF (difficulty in doing vision-related activities), and Questionnaire for Visual Disturbances (QUVID; Alcon Vision, LLC) (photic phenomena) questionnaires. RESULTS: Mean 3-month postoperative binocular uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities were 0.02 ± 0.11, -0.02 ± 0.09, and 0.14 ± 0.13 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), respectively. Mean binocular distance-corrected intermediate and near visual acuities were 0.05 ± 0.11 and 0.32 ± 0.14 logMAR, respectively. All eyes had a postoperative spherical equivalent within ±0.75 diopters (D). The mean defocus curve showed visual acuity values better than 0.20 logMAR for defocus levels from +0.50 to -1.50 D. Most patients (92.0%) confirmed that they had no vision-related difficulties limiting their normal daily life. Perception of starbursts, halos, glare, hazy vision, blurry vision, and double vision was referred by 24%, 24%, 28%, 28%, 8%, and 4% of patients, respectively. Most of symptoms were described as mild and not or a little bothersome. CONCLUSIONS: The wavefront-shaping EDOF IOL evaluated provides efficacious distance, intermediate, and near visual restoration in eyes with previous LASIK, with minimal photic phenomena associated. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(10):e742-e753.].

Comparison of long-term changes in the effective optical zone following SMILE and FS-LASIK for moderate and high myopia.

BACKGROUND: Visual quality after corneal refractive surgery is linked to the postoperative effective optical zone (EOZ). This study aims to compare long-term changes in the EOZ following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for moderate and high myopia. METHODS: This study included 42 patients (72 eyes) who underwent either SMILE (36 eyes) or FS-LASIK (36 eyes). A custom software program based on the tangential curvature difference map of the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) was used to define the EOZ at 3 and 7 years postoperatively. The EOZ, its chronological changes compared to the programmed optical zone (POZ), and the corneal wavefront aberrations following SMILE and FS-LASIK were analyzed. Correlations between the EOZ changes and relevant parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: Three years postoperatively, EOZ following SMILE and FS-LASIK were 5.13 ± 0.27 mm and 4.70 ± 0.24 mm (P < 0.001), respectively. Seven years postoperatively, EOZ following SMILE and FS-LASIK decreased to 5.03 ± 0.28 mm and 4.63 ± 0.23 mm (P < 0.001), respectively. At postoperative 7 years, the percentages of EOZ/POZ were negatively correlated with Q-value changes (ß = -5.120, P = 0.009) following SMILE and positively correlated with the cylinder correction (ß = 1.184, P = 0.004) following FS-LASIK. The induced spherical aberrations in the SMILE group were less than those in the FS-LASIK group (P < 0.05) and were negatively correlated with the EOZ/POZ (ß = -16.653, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The EOZ following SMILE was larger than that following FS-LASIK in the long postoperative term for moderate and high myopia. Furthermore, a continual reduction in the EOZ was noted after both surgical modalities.

Analysis of corneal remodeling post-myopic photorefractive keratectomy with the WaveLight® EX500 excimer laser.

Refractive error is becoming a significant public health issue. Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) is a corneal surface surgical technique that removes the corneal epithelium before stromal photoablation by ultraviolet radiation from the Excimer laser. We designed a retrospective study to characterize corneal remodeling after myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy and assess the accuracy of laser-predicted ablation depth (AD). This study took place in 15-20 National Ophthalmology Hospital, Paris, France. 150 eyes with preoperative manifest spherical equivalent between - 10.00D and - 0.25D and cylinder < 3D, treated with the WaveLight® EX500 laser between 01/2019 and 01/2023, were followed for at least three months. The main outcome measurements were postoperative changes in epithelial (ET) and stromal (ST) thicknesses measured with spectral domain optical coherence tomography and mean simulated keratometry (SimK) assessed with corneal topography. The central ET significantly decreased at M1, increased over the preoperative value from M1 to M6, and stabilized after M6. The increase in central ET after M1 was associated with an increase in mean SimK (r = 0.34). The achieved AD was 7.9 ± 8.0 µm greater than the laser-predicted AD. Stromal over-ablation was significantly and independently associated with myopia > 6D preoperative mean SimK > 44D and transepithelial procedures.

Full range of vision and visual quality after mini-monovision FS-LASIK in high myopic patients with presbyopia.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate clinical outcomes and visual quality 3 months after mini-monovision (spherical equivalent [SE] between - 0.25 D and - 0.50 D) femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for correction of high myopia in patients with presbyopia. METHODS: Patients who had mini-monovision FS-LASIK for high myopia (SE < -6.0 D) and aged between 40 and 50 years were included. At the 3-month postoperative visit, we evaluated full range of visual acuity; defocus curve; optical quality; accommodation function, contrast sensitivity and stereopsis. Binocular tests were done twice, once in mini-monovision condition and once with the residual myopia in the non-dominant eye corrected. Subjective visual quality was evaluated with questionnaire postoperatively with mini-monovision correction. RESULTS: Clinical data of 31 cases were analyzed. The average patient age was 42.58 ± 3.06 years. At the 3-month follow-up, the mean uncorrected binocular visual acuity at distance, intermediate, and near was - 0.11 ± 0.07, -0.06 ± 0.10, and 0.04 ± 0.11 logMAR separately. In comparison, patients with binocular full distance correction achieved better uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and they achieved superior uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA, P = 0.04) with mini-monovision correction. FS-LASIK induced significant increases in higher-order aberrations (HOAs) (P < 0.001). For accommodative function, only the negative relative accommodation (NRA) improved significantly after surgery (P < 0.001). A slight decrease in contrast sensitivity was observed at low spatial frequency with mini-monovision correction (P < 0.05). Questionnaire demonstrated high satisfaction with near vision and visual quality. CONCLUSION: FS-LASIK with mini-monovision (SE between - 0.25 D and - 0.50 D) appeared to be safe and effective in treating high myopia combined with presbyopia to get satisfying visual quality at distant and at near.

Study of corneal and retinal thicknesses at five years after FS-LASIK and SMILE for myopia.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to observe corneal and retinal thicknesses at 5 years after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia, investigate the effect of epithelial remodeling on refractive status and visual quality, and compare retinal thicknesses among fundus tessellation grades. METHODS: Patients who received FS-LASIK or SMILE 5 years before were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. After 1:1 propensity score matching, each surgical group obtained 177 patients (177 eyes). Examinations including visual acuity, refraction, corneal and retinal thicknesses, corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), and fundus photography were performed in this visit at 5 years after surgery. The Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire was used to assess visual symptoms and overall satisfaction. Corneal and retinal thicknesses between groups were compared, contributing factors were analyzed, and correlations with postoperative refractive status, HOAs, QoV scores and overall satisfaction were evaluated. RESULTS: The discrepancy of epithelial thickness between central and pericentral zones in FS-LASIK group was larger than that in SMILE group, which was negatively correlated with postoperative spherical equivalent (SE), positively correlated with spherical aberration (all P < 0.05), but not correlated with QoV scores and overall satisfaction (all P > 0.05) in both surgical groups. There was no statistical difference in stromal thickness and total corneal thickness (all P > 0.05). Most annuluses of epithelial and stromal thicknesse were linearly related to preoperative SE (all P < 0.05). The macular thickness, ganglion cell complex thickness, and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness exhibited comparable values between two surgical groups and four fundus tessellation grades, with no significant association observed with postoperative SE (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The tendency that epithelial thickness in central zone was thicker than peripheral zone was more obvious at 5 years after FS-LASIK compared to SMILE. This uneven distribution of epithelial thickness might play a role in myopic regression and the changes in HOAs, especially in patients with high myopia, but it had little effect on patients' subjective visual quality and satisfaction. Retinal thicknesses were not affected by these two surgical methods, and they did not appear to be the clinical indicators for myopic regression or fundus tessellation progression.

Prospective Objective Analysis of Corneal Haze Following Customized Transepithelial PRK Without Mitomycin C Combined With Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking Versus Corneal Cross-Linking Alone.

PURPOSE: To compare haze and refractive outcomes in patients undergoing combined accelerated corneal cross-linking (A-CXL) and selective wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (WG-transPRK) without mitomycin C (MMC) versus those undergoing A-CXL. METHODS: This prospective study analyzed 95 eyes (86 patients) with progressive keratoconus from October 2018 to October 2022. The first group underwent CXL combined with corneal or ocular WG-transPRK (CXL+PRK, n = 52), targeting higher order aberrations (HOAs). The second underwent CXL only (n = 43), both following the same accelerated CXL protocol without MMC on the SCHWIND Amaris laser platform (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions). Baseline and postoperative evaluations (1, 3, 6, and 12 months) included uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, manifest refraction, tomography, corneal HOAs, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans. A patented machine learning algorithm objectively detected and quantified stromal haze on OCT scans in grayscale units. RESULTS: In both groups, anterior corneal haze reflectivity and subepithelial haze peaked at 3 months postoperatively, then progressively decreased at 6 and 12 months. Haze did not differ between groups at any time point. By 12 months, CDVA increased by 2.5 lines in the CXL+PRK group (P < .001) and by 0.7 lines in the CXL group (P = .10), and maximum keratometry decreased from 51.70 ± 5.10 to 47.90 ± 7.90 diopters (D) (CXL+PRK group) (P < .001) and from 51.20 ± 5.10 to 50.30 ± 4.60 D (CXL group) (P = .004). Corneal HOAs decreased in both groups but more in the CXL+PRK group. CONCLUSIONS: Combining CXL with WG-transPRK without MMC does not result in increased haze when compared to A-CXL alone. This combined approach achieves greater improvements in visual, topographic, and aberrometric parameters. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e583-e594.].

12-Month Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Topography-guided Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To report 12-month visual and refractive outcomes following topography-guided femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia and compound myopic astigmatism correction. METHODS: This prospective, single-center observational study was conducted in an outpatient clinical practice at the Stanford University Byers Eye Institute in Palo Alto, California. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, 5% and 25% contrast sensitivity CDVA, and manifest refraction following topography-guided femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK were assessed. Refractive measurements were used to perform a vector analysis. RESULTS: Sixty eyes of 30 patients (mean age: 32.8 ± 7.0 years; range: 23 to 52 years) undergoing topography-guided LASIK for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism were analyzed. Mean postoperative UDVA was -0.09 ± 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at 12 months. Mean preoperative CDVA was -0.09 ± 0.09 and -0.13 ± 0.08 logMAR at postoperative 12 months. At 12 months, 26.9% of eyes had gained one or more lines of postoperative UDVA compared to baseline CDVA. Mean pre-operative 5% contrast sensitivity CDVA was 0.68 ± 0.07 and 0.64 ± 0.12 logMAR at 12 months (P = .014) following LASIK. CONCLUSIONS: Topography-guided LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction provided excellent visual and refractive outcomes that were predictable, precise, and stable up to 12 months postoperatively. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e595-e603.].

Effect of Posterior Keratometry and Corneal Radius Ratio on the Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Formulas After Myopic LASIK/PRK.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of back-to-front corneal radius ratio (B/F ratio) and posterior keratometry (PK) on the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in eyes after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)/photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery. METHODS: A retrospective, consecutive case series study included 101 patients (132 eyes) with cataract after myopic LASIK/PRK. Mean prediction error (PE), mean absolute PE (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), and the percentage of eyes within ±0.25, ±0.50, and ±1.00 diopters (D) of PE were determined. RESULTS: The Barrett True K-TK formula exhibited the lowest MAE (0.59 D) and MedAE (0.48 D) and the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.50 D of PE (54.55%) in total. In eyes with a B/F ratio of 0.70 or less and PK of -5.70 D or greater, the Potvin-Hill formula displayed the lowest MAE (0.46 to 0.67 D). CONCLUSIONS: The Barrett True-TK exhibited the highest prediction accuracy in eyes after myopic LASIK/PRK overall. However, for eyes with a low B/F ratio and flat PK, the Potvin-Hill performed best. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e635-e644.].

Low Contrast Acuity Outcomes After SMILE and LASIK.

PURPOSE: To compare early visual quality of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in terms of low contrast acuity. METHODS: A secondary analysis was performed using a harmonized dataset derived from two completed prospective cohort studies on active-duty military service members undergoing either SMILE (n = 37), wavefront-guided (WFG) LASIK (n = 51), or wavefront-optimized (WFO) LASIK (n = 56). Night vision and photopic and mesopic low contrast visual acuity (LCVA) up to 3 months postoperatively were compared between groups. RESULTS: Compared to SMILE-treated eyes, WFG LASIK-treated eyes had significantly better night vision and photopic LCVA at 1 month postoperatively (beta = -0.039, P = .016; beta = -0.043, P = .007, respectively). WFO LASIK-treated eyes had significantly better photopic LCVA at 1 month postoperatively (beta = -0.039, P = .012) but had worse mesopic LCVA at 3 months postoperatively (beta = 0.033, P = .015) versus SMILE-treated eyes. CONCLUSIONS: SMILE and LASIK, on either a WFG or WFO laser platform, yielded excellent outcomes, but LCVA seemed to recover quicker following LASIK compared to SMILE. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e667-e671.].

Decreased vision due to scarring after phototherapeutic keratectomy.

In May 2023, a 36-year-old carpenter complained of a sudden decrease in visual acuity in both eyes after his fourth COVID-19 vaccination. He underwent extensive evaluation by ophthalmological, neurological, and internal medicine specialists elsewhere, which was unremarkable, except for a computed tomography scan of his brain showing minor occipital calcifications. In 2021, he had been diagnosed with anterior basement membrane dystrophy and treated with phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) of the left eye, leading to significant postoperative haze. On referral in July 2023, slitlamp examination showed significant anterior basement membrane dystrophy in the right eye, whereas the left eye had an extensive central scar in the anterior stroma, measuring up to 6 mm in width and 140 µm in depth (Figures 1-3JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202410000-00017/figure1/v/2024-09-18T130724Z/r/image-tiffJOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202410000-00017/figure2/v/2024-09-18T130724Z/r/image-tiffJOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202410000-00017/figure3/v/2024-09-18T130724Z/r/image-tiff). His corrected distance visual acuity was 20/80 in his right eye and 20/200 in his left eye, with a manifest refraction of -0.50 -3.75 × 170 and +0.00 -4.75 × 180, respectively. Corneal Scheimpflug topography showed regular corneal astigmatism of 3.3 diopters (D) and 5.5 D in the right and left eyes, respectively, with a corneal thickness of 550 and 566 µm (Figure 4JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202410000-00017/figure4/v/2024-09-18T130724Z/r/image-tiff). The Schirmer tear test was 20-20 mm. Fundoscopy, electrophysiological testing, and retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed no abnormalities. The patient mentioned he had Crohn disease, managed with ustekinumab (a monoclonal antibody inhibitor of cytokines interleukin [IL]-12 and IL-23), but he had discontinued it because of the apparent remission of the disease. Attempts to improve visual acuity involved a soft bandage contact lens in the right eye, which was discontinued after 2 days because of the occurrence of a small corneal infiltrate that healed with a short course of topical antibiotics. Unfortunately, because of his vision, he cannot perform his tasks as a carpenter anymore. Which is your recommended treatment for both eyes?