Phase IB part of LOC-R01, a LOC network non-comparative randomized phase IB/II study testing R-MPV in combination with escalating doses of lenalidomide or ibrutinib for newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients.

BACKGROUND: Results of conventional induction chemotherapies in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) need to be improved. Ibrutinib, a BTK inhibitor, and lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug, have shown promising results at relapse, supporting to further assess their individual use in combination with high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL were randomized to receive four 28-day cycles of ibrutinib or lenalidomide in combination with R-MPV (rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine and prednisone) in a 3 + 3 design. Responders then received a consolidation with R-Cytarabine and an intensive chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. The objective of the phase IB study was to define the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) based on the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurring during the first induction cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (median age 52) were randomized. Four DLTs were observed: one grade 5 aspergillosis and pneumocystosis, one grade 4 catheter-related infection and two grade 3 increased alanine aminotransferase levels. RP2D of ibrutinib and lenalidomide were 560 mg daily (D3-14 and D17-28) and 15 mg daily (D1-21) respectively, in combination with R-MPV. In both arms, the most frequent grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were hepatic cytolysis, neutropenia and infections. One grade 4 Lyell's syndrome was reported at cycle 2 in the lenalidomide arm. After 4 induction cycles, the overall response rates were 76.9% and 83.3% in the lenalidomide and ibrutinib arm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Targeted induction therapies combining lenalidomide or ibrutinib with R-MPV are feasible for first-line PCNSL. The safety profile is consistent with the known safety profiles of R-MPV and both targeted therapies. The phase II part of the study is ongoing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04446962.

A case of paraprotein-negative POEMS syndrome: Case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: POEMS syndrome is a rare monoclonal plasma cell disease. The diagnosis of POEMS requires polyradiculoneuropathy and monoclonal plasma proliferating as 2 mandatory criteria, at least 1 of the major criteria (Castleman disease, elevated vascular endothelial growth factor level, and sclerotic bone lesion), and at least 1 of the minor criteria (organomegaly, extravascular volume overload, endocrinopathy, skin changes, papilledema, and thrombocytosis/polycythemia). This multisystem disorder is of high heterogeneity, and few variants of POEMS with no evidence of monoclonal gammopathy have been described, which further complicates the diagnosis in clinical practice. Now, we report a case of paraprotein-negative POEMS syndrome. PATIENTS CONCERNS: A 45-year-old woman complained of lower extremity edema, shortness of breath, abdominal distension, and lymphadenopathy for few years. Finally, she was diagnosed with paraprotein-negative POEMS syndrome. With the lenalidomide-based regimen, the symptoms were all relieved. DIAGNOSIS: Paraprotein-negative POEMS syndrome. INTERVENTION: Lenalidomide-based regimen and some supportive therapy. OUTCOME: All symptoms were relieved after 1 year of treatment. LESSONS: Physicians should pay more attention to the POEMS syndrome, especially the POEMS syndrome variants, which are absence of paraprotein; probably, these variants are just "on the way" to classic POEMS syndrome antiplasma cell therapy, which remains the treatment of choice.

Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD), and bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (PAD), are commonly used in induction regimens for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) in China. This real-world study enrolled 390 patients, 195 receiving VRD and 195 receiving PAD induction. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and stringent complete remission/complete remission. Across the entire cohort, VRD demonstrated significantly improved five-year overall survival (OS) (74% vs. 59%, p = 0.0024) and five-year PFS (67% vs. 37%, p = 0.0018) compared to PAD. Notably, the median OS and PFS were not reached for VRD-treated patients, while they were 77 months (60-not reached [NR]) and 46 months (36-NR), respectively, for PAD. In patients with standard-risk cytogenetics, VRD showed superior five-year OS (83% vs. 58%, p = 0.0038) and PFS (78% vs. 48%, p = 0.0091) compared to PAD. However, these differences were not statistically significant in high-risk patients. For transplanted patients, VRD was associated with superior five-year OS (91% vs. 67%, p = 0.014) and PFS (79% vs. 47%, p = 0.015) compared to PAD. In non-transplanted patients, VRD showed a trend towards improved five-year OS (p = 0.085) and PFS (p = 0.073) compared to the PAD group. In conclusion, VRD displayed superior OS and PFS outcomes in standard-risk patients and those who underwent transplantation. These findings suggest potential advantages of VRD over PAD in real-world clinical settings for NDMM treatment. However, due to the imbalance in transplantation rates between the VRD and PAD groups, limitations in testing for high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA), and the difference between the received cycles and salvage therapies, the conclusions of this study should be interpreted with caution.

Quadruplet therapy for newly diagnosed myeloma: comparative analysis of sequential cohorts with triplet therapy lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (RVd) versus daratumamab with RVD (DRVd) in transplant-eligible patients.

Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) have previously been established as standard-of-care induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). More recently, randomized phase 3 data have demonstrated the benefit of the addition of daratumumab (Dara-RVd) to the RVd backbone in terms of improved both depth of response and long-term survival benefit as measured by progression-free survival (PFS). Our group has previously published on a historical cohort of 1000 NDMM patients uniformly treated with RVd induction with impressive both PFS and overall survival. Here, we present a comparative analysis of our RVd cohort with a recent cohort of 326 patients induced with Dara-RVd at our institution with intent to transplant. This analysis demonstrates the utility of this regimen in real-world clinical practice and provides additional insights into D-RVd performance in patient subsets often underrepresented in clinical trials, as well as the impact of daratumumab in maintenance for NDMM patients.

Cost-per-responder analysis of patients with lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma receiving ciltacabtagene autoleucel in CARTITUDE-4.

Introduction: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy approved for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In the phase 3 trial, CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827), cilta-cel demonstrated improved efficacy vs. standard of care (SOC; daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone [DPd] or pomalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone [PVd]) with a ≥ complete response (≥CR) rate of 73.1% vs. 21.8%. Methods: A cost-per-responder model was developed to assess the value of cilta-cel and SOC (87% DPd and 13% PVd) based on the CARTITUDE-4 trial data from a US mixed payer perspective (76.7% commercial, 23.3% Medicare). The model was developed using progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and ≥CR endpoints from CARTITUDE-4 over a period of 25.4 months. Inpatient stays, outpatient visits, drug acquisition, administration, and monitoring costs were included. The base-case model assumed an inpatient setting for each cilta-cel infusion; another scenario included 30% outpatient and 70% inpatient infusions. Costs of managing grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) and grade 1-4 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity were included. Subsequent therapy costs were incurred after disease progression; terminal care costs were considered upon death events. Outcomes included total cost per treated patient, total cost per complete responder, and cost per month in PFS between cilta-cel and SOC. Costs were adjusted to 2024 US dollars. Results: Total cost per treated patient, total cost per complete responder, and total cost per month in PFS were estimated at $704,641, $963,941, and $30,978 for cilta-cel, respectively, and $840,730, $3,856,559, and $42,520 for SOC over the 25.4-month period. Cost drivers included treatment acquisition costs before progression and subsequent treatment costs ($451,318 and $111,637 for cilta-cel; $529,795 and $265,167 for SOC). A scenario analysis in which 30% of patients received an outpatient infusion (assuming the same payer mix) showed a lower cost per complete responder for cilta-cel ($956,523) than those with an infusion in the inpatient setting exclusively. Discussion: This analysis estimated that cost per treated patient, cost per complete responder, and cost per month in PFS for cilta-cel were remarkably lower than for DPd or PVd, highlighting the substantial clinical and economic benefit of cilta-cel for patients with RRMM.

Maintenance therapy for cytogenetically high-risk multiple myeloma: landscape in the era of novel drugs.

Although the significant strides in novel therapeutic approaches have prolonged the survival of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, the unfavorable prognosis of cytogenetically high-risk newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) remains intractable with the lack of consensus regarding the choice of maintenance regimens. Therefore, this study was initiated with the aim of examining the effectiveness of various maintenance treatments for this group of patients in jeopardy. Overall, 17 studies with 1937 high-risk NDMM patients were included in the network meta-analysis. Combination therapies involving novel drugs presented encouraging prospects in the maintenance phase, while the patients and circumstances for the application of different regimens still needed to be further distinguished and clarified. To investigate the current status of maintenance therapy of high-risk NDMM patients in clinical practice, a real-world cohort of high-risk NDMM was retrospectively incorporated 80 patients with lenalidomide maintenance and 53 patients with bortezomib maintenance, presenting the median PFS of 31.7 months and 30.4 months, respectively (p = 0.874, HR = 0.966, 95% CI: 0.628-1.486). Collectively, this study illuminated the present constraints of conventional approaches during the maintenance phase for high-risk NDMM patients while highlighting the future potential associated with enhanced regimens integrating novel medications.

[Durable remission with lenalidomide in a patient with early relapse of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma after cord blood transplantation].

A 62-year-old woman with adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) received umbilical cord blood transplantation (CBT) in first complete remission. However, relapse of ATL was detected on day 74 post-transplantation, as evidenced by the rapid growth of lymphoma cells in peripheral blood and an increase in soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL2R) levels. Discontinuation of immunosuppressant therapy alone did not improve ATL findings, but treatment with lenalidomide caused lymphoma cells to disappear from the peripheral blood and sIL2R levels to return to normal. Pancytopenia was observed as a lenalidomide-associated adverse effect, but lymphocyte counts were not reduced. The patient was judged to be in complete remission based on results of Southern blot analysis and human T-cell leukemia virus 1 (HTLV-1)-infected cell analysis using flow cytometry (HAS-Flow). Flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood and FISH analysis of X and Y chromosomes revealed that the therapeutic effect of lenalidomide was associated with an increase in the number of donor-derived peripheral natural killer cells. ATL relapse was not observed at 13 months into lenalidomide treatment. Our results suggest that lenalidomide is an effective option for the treatment of post-transplant relapsed ATL.

BCL6 confers resistance to HDAC inhibitors in DLBCL.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma with limited response to chemotherapy. Histone acetylation is reduced in DLBCL. Chidamide, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, shows promise in lymphomas but needs further investigation for DLBCL. Our study indicated that chidamide effectively suppresses DLBCL both in vitro and in vivo. High-throughput RNA sequencing analysis provided comprehensive evidence that chidamide markedly influences crucial signaling pathways in DLBCL, including the MAPK, MYC and p53 pathway. Additionally, we observed substantial variability in the sensitivity of DLBCL cells to chidamide, and identified that elevated expression of BCL6 might confer resistance to chidamide in DLBCL. Moreover, our investigations revealed that BCL6 inhibited chidamide-induced histone acetylation by recruiting histone deacetylase (HDACs), leading to drug resistance in DLBCL cells. Furthermore, we found that lenalidomide targeted BCL6 degradation through the ubiquitination pathway and restore the sensitivity of drug-resistant DLBCL to chidamide. Collectively, these findings provided valuable insights into the global impact of chidamide on DLBCL and highlight the potential of targeting HDACs as a therapeutic strategy for DLBCL. Identifying BCL6 as a biomarker for predicting the response to chidamide and the combination therapy with BCL6 inhibition has the potential to lead to more personalized and effective treatments for DLBCL patients.

[Clinical Analysis of PD-1 Inhibitor Combined with Lenalidomide in Treatment of Relapsed CD5+ Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical characteristics and treatment of relapsed CD5+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: The data of a patient with CD5+ DLBCL was collected, and its clinical characteristics and treatment outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: The patient developed hemophagocytic syndrome and achieved complete remission (CR) after 6 cycles of R-ECHOP chemotherapy, then relapsed. After 2 cycles of PD-1 inhibitor combined with lenalidomide treatment, the patient achieved CR again accompanied by a decrease of interleukin (IL)-10 expression level. After a total of 15 cycles of chemotherapy, the patient remained in CR for 24 months, and the level of IL-10 remained in the normal range. CONCLUSION: PD-1 inhibitor combined with lenalidomide regimen may be a new treatment for relapsed CD5+ DLBCL.

Multisite distribution of fibrillary inclusions in a patient with light chain proximal tubulopathy: A case report.

RATIONALE: Light chain proximal tubulopathy (LCPT) is a rare form of renal impairment associated with multiple myeloma (MM). LCPT is caused by inclusions formed of free light chains that are typically crystalline, but can also be noncrystalline structures. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 62-year-old man was hospitalized for the investigation of abnormal urine test results lasting for 1 year and kidney-function abnormalities persisting for more than 1 month. DIAGNOSES: Noncrystalline LCPT and MM. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with the lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone and pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone chemotherapy regimens. OUTCOMES: Complete remission of MM was achieved, and the patient's renal function returned to normal. LESSONS: This case report highlights the importance of renal pathology in the diagnosis of patients with unexplained chronic kidney disease and proteinuria.

Transcriptomic classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identifies a high-risk activated B-cell-like subpopulation with targetable MYC dysregulation.

Immunochemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (ndDLBCL) yet is inadequate for many patients. In this work, we perform unsupervised clustering on transcriptomic features from a large cohort of ndDLBCL patients and identify seven clusters, one called A7 with poor prognosis, and develop a classifier to identify these clusters in independent ndDLBCL cohorts. This high-risk cluster is enriched for activated B-cell cell-of-origin, low immune infiltration, high MYC expression, and copy number aberrations. We compare and contrast our methodology with recent DLBCL classifiers to contextualize our clusters and show improved prognostic utility. Finally, using pre-clinical models, we demonstrate a mechanistic rationale for IKZF1/3 degraders such as lenalidomide to overcome the low immune infiltration phenotype of A7 by inducing T-cell trafficking into tumors and upregulating MHC I and II on tumor cells, and demonstrate that TCF4 is an important regulator of MYC-related biology in A7.

Efficacy of CARVYKTI in CARTITUDE-4 versus other conventional treatment regimens for lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Aim: The phase III randomized controlled trial (RCT) CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827) demonstrated superiority of CARVYKTI (ciltacabtagene autoleucel; cilta-cel) over daratumumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd) and pomalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd) for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have received one to three prior line(s) of therapy (LOT[s]) including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor, and are refractory to lenalidomide. These analyses estimate the relative efficacy between cilta-cel and other common treatment regimens, for which no direct comparative evidence is available. Materials & methods: Patient data were available from the CARTITUDE-4, CASTOR, CANDOR and APOLLO RCTs. Imbalances between cohorts on key patient characteristics were adjusted for using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Relative efficacies were estimated with response rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall response rate (ORR), very good partial response or better rate (≥VGPR) and complete response or better rate (≥CR), and with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for progression-free survival (PFS). Sensitivity analyses using different analytical methods and additional covariates were explored. Results: Key characteristics were well balanced across cohorts after IPTW. Cilta-cel showed statistically significant benefit in PFS (HRs: 0.11-0.51), ≥VGPR (RRs: 1.51-5.13) and ≥CR (RRs: 2.90-35.24) versus all comparators, and statistically significant improvements in ORR over most comparator regimens (RRs: 1.22-1.90). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Cilta-cel demonstrated benefit over other common treatment regimens, highlighting its potential to become a new standard of care option for lenalidomide-refractory RRMM patients with one to three prior LOT(s). These comparisons help to demonstrate the improved efficacy of cilta-cel in countries where the standard of care may differ from DPd/PVd.

The impact of continuous lenalidomide maintenance treatment on people living with multiple myeloma-a single-centre, qualitative service evaluation study.

PURPOSE: Continuous lenalidomide maintenance treatment after autologous stem cell transplantation delivers improvement in progression free and overall survival among newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients and has been the standard of care in the UK since March 2021. However, there is scant information about its impact on patients' day-to-day lives. This service evaluation aimed to qualitatively assess patients receiving lenalidomide treatment at a cancer centre in London, in order that the service might better align with needs and expectations of patients. METHODS: We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews among myeloma patients who were on continuous lenalidomide maintenance treatment at a specialist cancer centre in London. Members of the clinical team identified potentially eligible participants to take part, and convenience sampling was used to select 10 male and 10 female patients, median age of 58 (range, 45-71). The median treatment duration was 11 months (range, 1-60 months). Participants were qualitatively interviewed following the same semi-structured interview guide, which was designed to explore patient experience and insights of lenalidomide. Reflexive thematic analysis was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Four overarching themes were as follows: (i) lenalidomide: understanding its role and rationale; (ii) reframing the loss of a treatment-free period to a return to normal life; (iii) the reality of being on lenalidomide: balancing hopes with hurdles; (iv) gratitude and grievances: exploring mixed perceptions of care and communication. Results will be used to enhance clinical services by tailoring communication to better meet patients' preferences when making treatment decisions. CONCLUSION: This study highlights that most patients feel gratitude for being offered continuous lenalidomide and perceive it as alleviating some fears concerning relapse. It reveals variations in side effects in different age groups; younger patients reported no/negligible side effects, whilst several older patients with comorbidities described significant symptom burden, occasionally leading to treatment discontinuation which caused distress at the perceived loss of prolonged remission. Future research should prioritise understanding the unique needs of younger patients living with multiple myeloma.

Comprehensive analysis of serum cytokines in patients with multiple myeloma before and after lenalidomide and dexamethasone.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable B-cell malignancy often accompanied by profound immunodeficiency. Lenalidomide (Len) is an immunomodulatory drug that exerts promising therapeutic effects on MM through the immune system. However, predictive markers related to the effects of Len treatment are not fully understood. This study aimed to identify candidate biomarkers for predicting the clinical efficacy of Len and dexamethasone (Ld) therapy through a comprehensive analysis of serum cytokines. The levels of 48 cytokines in the serum of patients with MM just before Ld therapy (n = 77), at the time of best response (n = 56), and at disease progression (n = 49) were measured and evaluated. Patients with high IL-18 and M-CSF levels showed significantly shorter progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). In contrast, patients with high PDGF-BB levels had longer survival. Moreover, low levels of G-CSF, IL-7, IL-8, and SDF-1α were associated with shorter OS after Ld therapy. During Ld therapy, pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-2Rα, IL-18, and TNF-α were decreased, while IFN-γ was increased. IL-4 and IL-6 levels increased during disease progression. In conclusion, this study provides a better understanding of the association between cytokines and the efficacy of Ld therapy as well as the unique changes in cytokines related to inflammatory and immune responses during Ld therapy.

The Effect of Age and Other Patient Characteristics on Outcomes Among Nontransplanted Patients Who Were Treated With First-Line Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone: Results From the ConnectⓇ MM Registry.

BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide (R), bortezomib (V), and dexamethasone (d) is a standard-of-care regimen in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM); however, characteristics and outcomes for nontransplanted patients receiving frontline RVd are not well understood. PATIENTS: The ConnectⓇ MM Registry is a large, US, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study of NDMM patients. METHODS: This analysis investigated characteristics and outcomes of patients who received RVd alone or followed by Rd or R (RVd ± Rd/R) who did not undergo frontline autologous stem cell transplantation. RESULTS: As of August 2021, 314 of 1979 nontransplanted patients received RVd ± Rd/R as initial therapy. Of these, 135 were aged ≤ 65 years and 179 were > 65 years. 108 patients had time to relapse (TTR) of ≤ 12 months and 182 had TTR > 12 months. Baseline characteristics were comparable regardless of TTR and age group except renal function, which was more commonly impaired in older patients. Among patients aged ≤ 65 and > 65 years, median duration of first-line treatment was 6.3 and 9.0 months, median time to next line for those who received second-line therapy was 15.5 and 15.2 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.3 and 23.0 months, and median overall survival was 60.0 and 59.1 months, respectively. High-risk disease (per IMWG criteria) and high serum calcium were associated with higher hazard of progression or death; the adjusted PFS hazard ratio with respect to age (≤ 65 vs. > 65 years) based on multivariable analysis was 1.18 (0.89-1.57; P = .25). CONCLUSION: These results indicate RVd is active across age groups and provide a better understanding of outcomes with RVd in NDMM.

Daratumumab in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of clinically relevant subgroups in GRIFFIN.

The randomized, phase 2 GRIFFIN study (NCT02874742) evaluated daratumumab plus lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-RVd) in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We present final post hoc analyses (median follow-up, 49.6 months) of clinically relevant subgroups, including patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) per revised definition (del[17p], t[4;14], t[14;16], t[14;20], and/or gain/amp[1q21]). Patients received 4 induction cycles (D-RVd/RVd), high-dose therapy/transplant, 2 consolidation cycles (D-RVd/RVd), and lenalidomide±daratumumab maintenance (≤ 2 years). Minimal residual disease-negativity (10-5) rates were higher for D-RVd versus RVd in patients ≥ 65 years (67.9% vs 17.9%), with HRCAs (54.8% vs 32.4%), and with gain/amp(1q21) (61.8% vs 28.6%). D-RVd showed a trend toward improved progression-free survival versus RVd (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) in patients ≥ 65 years (0.29 [0.06-1.48]), with HRCAs (0.38 [0.14-1.01]), and with gain/amp(1q21) (0.42 [0.14-1.27]). In the functional high-risk subgroup (not MRD negative at the end of consolidation), the hazard ratio was 0.82 (0.35-1.89). Among patients ≥ 65 years, grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates were higher for D-RVd versus RVd (88.9% vs 77.8%), as were TEAEs leading to discontinuation of ≥ 1 treatment component (37.0% vs 25.9%). One D-RVd patient died due to an unrelated TEAE. These results support the addition of daratumumab to RVd in transplant-eligible patients with high-risk NDMM. Video Abstract.

Low dose lenalidomide versus placebo in non-transfusion dependent patients with low risk, del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes (SintraREV): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide is the standard of care for patients who are transfusion dependent with chromosome 5q deletion (del[5q]) myelodysplastic syndromes. In the SintraREV trial, we aimed to investigate whether an early intervention of low lenalidomide doses for 2 years could delay transfusion dependency in patients with anaemia who were not transfusion dependent. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial, was conducted at 22 sites (University Hospitals) in Spain, France, and Germany. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older diagnosed with low-risk or intermediate-1-risk del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes with non-transfusion-dependent anaemia (according to the IPSS), were erythropoietin-stimulating agents naive, and had an ECOG performance status of 2 or less. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) by means of a telephone system to receive lenalidomide 5 mg daily in 28-day cycles versus placebo for 2 years. The primary endpoint was time to transfusion dependency based on blinded independent central review. Analysis were by intent-to-treat (ITT) and evaluable population. Safety analyses included all participants who received at least one dose of treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01243476) and EudraCT (2009-013619-36) and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Feb 15, 2010, and Feb 21, 2018, 61 patients were randomly assigned to receive lenalidomide (n=40; two did not receive treatment) or placebo (n=21). The median age was 72·2 (IQR 65·4-81·9) years, 50 (82%) patients were female, and 11 (18%) were male. The median follow-up time was 60·6 (IQR 32·1-73·9) months. Regarding primary endpoint, median time to transfusion dependency was not reached (95% CI not applicable) in the lenalidomide group versus 11·6 months (95% CI 0·00-30·11) in the placebo group (p=0·0027). Lenalidomide significantly reduced the risk of transfusion dependency by 69·8% (hazard ratio 0·302, 95% CI 0·132-0·692; p=0·0046). The most frequent treatment-related adverse event was neutropenia, occurring in 24 (63%) of 38 patients in the lenalidomide group (grade 3 and 4 in 17 [45%] patients and one [3%], respectively) and in four (19%) of 21 patients in the placebo group (grade 3 in one [5%] patient). Thrombocytopenia was detected in seven (18%) of 38 patients receiving lenalidomide (grade 3 in two [5%] patients). Regarding the non-haematological toxicity, skin disorders (rash nine [23%] of 38 patients) were the most frequently described toxicities among patients receiving lenalidomide, being grade 3 in one (3%) of 38 patients. 19 serious adverse events were reported in 13 patients, 18 in the lenalidomide group and one in the placebo group, five of which were potentially related to the study drug. No treatment-related deaths were identified. INTERPRETATION: An early approach with low doses of lenalidomide across two years delays the time to transfusion dependency and improves the rate and quality of the responses, with a manageable safety profile in patients who are non-transfusion dependent with del(5q) low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. FUNDING: Bristol Myers Squibb.

Stem cell collection and hematological recovery in the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) MCL0208 clinical trial.

In the frontline high-dose phase 3 FIL-MCL0208 trial (NCT02354313), 8% of enrolled mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients could not be randomised to receive lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance vs observation after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) due to inadequate hematological recovery and 52% of those who started LEN, needed a dose reduction due to toxicity. We therefore focused on the role played by CD34 + hematopoietic stem cells (PBSC) harvesting and reinfusion on toxicity and outcome. Overall, 90% (n = 245) of enrolled patients who underwent the first leukapheresis collected ≥ 4 × 106 PBSC/kg, 2.6% (n = 7) mobilized < 4 × 106 PBSC/kg and 7.7% (n = 21) failed the collection. Similar results were obtained for the planned second leukapheresis, with only one patient failing both attempts. Median count of reinfused PBSC was 5 × 106/kg and median time to recovery from neutropenia G4 was 10 days from ASCT. No impact of mobilizing subtype or number of reinfused PBSC on hematological recovery and LEN dose reduction was noted. At a median follow-up of 75 months from ASCT, PFS and OS of transplanted patients were 50% and 73%, respectively. A long lasting G4 neutropenia after ASCT (> 10 days) was associated with a worse outcome, both in terms of PFS and OS. In conclusion, although the harvesting procedures proved feasible for younger MCL patients, long-lasting cytopenia following ASCT remains a significant issue: this can hinder the administration of effective maintenance therapies, potentially increasing the relapse rate and negatively affecting survival outcomes.