Comparison of measurements and calculated lens power using three biometers: a Scheimpflug tomographer with partial coherence interferometry and two swept source optical coherence tomographers.

PURPOSE: To compare the biometric measurements obtained from the Pentacam AXL Wave, IOLMaster 700, and ANTERION and calculate the recommended intraocular lens power using the Barrett Formulae. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients who underwent biometry using the Pentacam AXL Wave, IOLMaster 700, and ANTERION. Flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and axial length (AL) from each device were measured and compared. These parameters were used to calculate the recommended IOL powers using the Barrett formula. RESULTS: The study included 252 eyes of 153 patients. The IOLMaster had the highest acquisition rate among the two biometers. The Pentacam obtained the shortest mean AL, the IOLMaster measured the highest mean keratometry values, and the ANTERION measured the highest mean ACD. In terms of pairwise comparisons, keratometry and axial length were not significantly different between the Pentacam-IOLMaster and ANTERION-IOLMaster groups, while the rest of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant. In nontoric and toric eyes, 35-45% of patients recommended the same sphere of IOL power. In another 30-40%, the Pentacam and ANTERION recommended an IOL power one step greater than that of the IOLMaster-derived data. 50% of the study population recommended the same toric-cylinder IOL power. CONCLUSIONS: The Pentacam AXL Wave, IOLMaster 700, and ANTERION can reliably provide data for IOL power calculations; however, these data are not interchangeable. In nontoric and toric eyes, 35-45% of cases recommended the same sphere IOL power, and in another 30-40%, the Pentacam and ANTERION recommended one-step higher IOL power than the IOLMaster-derived data. In targeting emmetropia, selecting the first plus IOL power is advisable when using the Pentacam and ANTERION to approximate the IOL power calculations recommended by the IOLMaster 700.

Successful Application of Buccal Mucosal Graft Transplant in Resistant Suture Exposure of Transscleral-Sutured Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens.

We report the successful reconstruction of suture exposure with the oral mucosal graft in a patient with suture exposure after transscleral-sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. The 70-year-old patient had a history of vitreoretinal surgery and transscleral-sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation after complicated cataract surgery. He was referred to our department because of suture exposure. The best-corrected visual acuity was 20/2000 OD and 20/50 OS. We observed exposed PC9 sutures from both the nasal and temporal conjunctiva in the right eye. The patient showed appearance of scleromalacia in the same regions, so scleral flap surgery was not considered. Despite both tenoplasty and amniotic membrane transplant procedures, exposure could not be controlled. Instead, the patient received oral (buccal) mucosal graft transplant to the resistant exposure areas. A single layer of protective amniotic membrane was transplanted over the buccal mucosal graft. This method resulted in effective control of the exposed area. In conclusion, an oral mucosal graft can be used in many ocular pathologies that require conjunctival reconstruction because of the simplicity of tissue excision from the mucosa, allowing adequate tissue excision, durability of the obtained tissue, and ease of use. Our case report highlights that resistant transscleral-sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens suture exposure can be successfully managed with oral mucosal grafting.

Functional outcomes and quality of life after AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens implantation in a real-world study.

The extended depth-of-focus AcrySof IQ Vivity intraocular lens technology offers promising features for presbyopia management, evaluated in this research in a 6 months real-world setting. Prospective interventional mono-centric study including 40 patients who underwent elective bilateral phacoemulsification. We performed one pre-operative visit (V0) and one evaluation six months post-operatively (V1), evaluating uncorrected and corrected visual acuity for near (UNVA/CNVA), intermediate (UIVA/CIVA) and far (UDVA/UCVA), slit-lamp evaluation, tomography with static pupillometry, endothelial cell count and contrast sensitivity chart. In order to assess post-operative Quality of Life, we administered the patients McAlinden's Quality of Vision test and Morlock's Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire. We divided eyes in with Toric-IOL and with non-Toric IOL. A total of 36 eyes received non-tonic IOL implantation, whereas 44 eyes received toric IOL implantation. There were no statistically significant disparities observed in visual outcome measures and contrast sensitivity between the toric group and the non-toric group. Furthermore, we assessed the predictive preoperative refractive astigmatism (PPRA) and residual refractive astigmatism (RRA) in both cohorts, and no statistical significance was found between the two cohorts (p = 0.08). Twenty-one (53%) patients reported total independence from their glasses at all distances. The mean difference between the predicted and measured refractive error, as calculated by spherical equivalent, was 0.09 D. AcrySof IQ Vivity is a well-tolerated and effective IOL with optimal refractive target for both distant and intermediate vision, needing slight spherical addition for the best near vision. Great questionnaire-based satisfaction was reported by the patients.

Adjustable flanged technique for secondary implantation of four-point scleral­fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses using two parallel 6-0 polyglactin sutures.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of using the adjustable flanged technique for secondary implantation of four-point scleral­fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses with two parallel 6-0 polyglactin sutures. METHODS: Two parallel 6-0 polyglactin sutures were passed separately through the two haptics on the horizontal line of the 4-haptic IOL. The four externalized sutures were then trimmed and cauterized to form flanges. The best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and complications in all patients were observed and recorded. RESULTS: The flanged technique using two parallel 6-0 polyglactin sutures was applied to 14 aphakic eyes. The average preoperative best corrected visual acuity was 1.00 ± 0.88 LogMAR (Snellen 20/200), which improved to 0.42 ± 0.38 LogMAR (Snellen 20/48) at the final follow-up (P = 0.004). None of the patients experienced vitreous hemorrhage, low intraocular pressure, or issues with exposed or broken sutures. CONCLUSION: The simplicity of the technique, along with its ability to accommodate adjustments post-implantation, allows for optimal positioning and reduces risks like IOL tilt or dislocation. Overall, this is a promising approach to secondary IOL implantation, with potential benefits for both patient outcomes and surgical efficiency.

Comparison of Objective and Subjective Visual Outcomes Between Pentafocal and Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and aberrometric outcomes obtained with a new diffractive pentafocal intraocular lens (IOL) and a diffractive trifocal IOL. METHODS: Patients bilaterally implanted with the pentafocal Intensity SeeLens IOL (Hanita Lenses) (n = 30) and the trifocal FineVision POD F IOL (PhysIOL) (n = 30) during cataract surgery were studied after 1 month for refraction, visual acuity, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, Hartmann-Shack aberration, and double-pass aberration. The Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire was used to evaluate visual comfort. RESULTS: Distance and near visual acuities were similar with the two IOLs, but distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity was better with the Intensity IOLs (0.03 ± 0.04 vs 0.11 ± 0.04 logMAR in the FineVision eyes, P < .01). The difference between objective and subjective refraction was more myopic for the Intensity IOL (-1.15 vs -0.29 diopters [D]). The defocus curve was flatter with the Intensity IOL. Contrast sensitivity was similar in both IOLs. Hartmann-Shack aberration and double-pass aberration were similar, but the modulation transfer function cut-off value was worse with the Intensity IOL: 11.6 ± 2.7 vs 15.3 ± 4.9 (P < .01). QoV scores were better with the Intensity IOL, in particular for glare, halos, and starburst. CONCLUSIONS: In this comparative series, the pentafocal Intensity IOL provided better intermediate vision and better defocus curve than the FineVision IOL, with comparable distance and near vision. The optical disturbances as reported by the patients were higher with the FineVision IOL. Additional studies will better define the aberration profile obtained with the pentafocal IOL. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e604-e613.].

Effect of Posterior Keratometry and Corneal Radius Ratio on the Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Formulas After Myopic LASIK/PRK.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of back-to-front corneal radius ratio (B/F ratio) and posterior keratometry (PK) on the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in eyes after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)/photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery. METHODS: A retrospective, consecutive case series study included 101 patients (132 eyes) with cataract after myopic LASIK/PRK. Mean prediction error (PE), mean absolute PE (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), and the percentage of eyes within ±0.25, ±0.50, and ±1.00 diopters (D) of PE were determined. RESULTS: The Barrett True K-TK formula exhibited the lowest MAE (0.59 D) and MedAE (0.48 D) and the highest percentage of eyes within ±0.50 D of PE (54.55%) in total. In eyes with a B/F ratio of 0.70 or less and PK of -5.70 D or greater, the Potvin-Hill formula displayed the lowest MAE (0.46 to 0.67 D). CONCLUSIONS: The Barrett True-TK exhibited the highest prediction accuracy in eyes after myopic LASIK/PRK overall. However, for eyes with a low B/F ratio and flat PK, the Potvin-Hill performed best. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e635-e644.].

Influence of Capsular Tension Rings on the IOL-Capsule Complex in Patients With Long Axial Length: A Clinical Observation Based on SS-OCT.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of a capsular tension ring (CTR) on the intraocular lens (IOL)-capsule complex after cataract surgery in patients with long axial length. METHODS: This was a prospective study. Patients underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation, with or without CTR implantation. Swept-source optical coherence tomography was performed at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively to determine the postoperative aqueous depth (PAD), capsular bend index (CBI), and IOL tilt and decentration. Spherical equivalent values were obtained through subjective refraction and autorefraction. Root mean square was adopted to evaluate the indices listed above. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (56 eyes) were included in the study. Generalized estimating equation analysis of PAD showed a statistical difference between groups (P = .031). The RMS of the change in PAD was smaller in the CTR group than in the non-CTR group during the 3 months after surgery (P = .015). CBI in the CTR group increased more from 1 to 3 months after surgery than that in the non-CTR group (P = .025). The RMS of the change in vertical decentration was smaller in the CTR group than in the non-CTR group during the 3-month follow-up (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: CTR implantation can stabilize the axial position of the IOL within the capsular bag after cataract surgery in patients with long axial length without affecting the refractive stability. The formation of capsular bend may be slightly delayed in the early stage after CTR implantation, but it accelerates from 1 to 3 months after surgery. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e654-e661.].

A New Small-Aperture Device Implanted on Top of the Intraocular Lens: Safety, Feasibility, and First Clinical Results.

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and safety of a new small-aperture device, which is implanted on top of the intraocular lens. METHODS: Regular cataract surgery was performed in both eyes in 7 patients. In the non-dominant eye, a small-aperture device (VisionXtender; Morcher) was additionally implanted into the capsular bag at the end of the surgery. The mask had an inner diameter of 1.4 mm. Feasibility and safety were investigated 3 months and 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: In all cases, the device was successfully positioned in the capsular bag without any intraoperative complications. No inflammation was observed at the 3-month follow-up visit. All patients achieved binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity of 0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log-MAR) or better. Additionally, distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity of 0.1 logMAR or better was measured in the non-dominant eye. Two years postoperatively, Nd:YAG capsulotomy was performed in three patients in both eyes. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical feasibility trial demonstrates that the use of the new small-aperture device is both easy and safe. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. All patients attained satisfactory distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity. The device shows significant potential when used in combination with different intraocular lenses (eg, toric). In the future, different opening shapes seem to be possible. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e662-e666.].

[On the issue of diagnostic accuracy of methods for analyzing the parameters of regular astigmatism]. / K voprosu o diagnosticheskoi tochnosti metodov indikatsii pokazatelei regulyarnogo astigmatizma.

Accurate measurement of astigmatism parameters is the basis for prescribing modern means of optical correction. In recent years, another direction for correcting astigmatism has emerged - implantation of toric intraocular lenses (TIOL). PURPOSE: This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of various methods for measuring the parameters of regular astigmatism. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 83 patients (122 eyes) with regular astigmatism exceeding 1.0 D. Three groups were formed depending on the type of astigmatism. Spherical and cylindrical (power and axis) components of refraction were determined using automatic refractometry. The results were refined with subjective tests: power and axis tests with a cross-cylinder. The criterion for diagnostic accuracy was the level of corrected visual acuity. To assess the impact of cylinder position on visual acuity, discrete deviations of the axis of trial astigmatic lenses from the correct position (determined based on subjective tests) were modeled at 5, 10, and 15 degrees in both clockwise and counterclockwise directions. RESULTS: In the overall sample of observations, coincidence of results was found only in one-third of cases, with a tendency for discrepancies in data between the two methods in nearly 70% of cases. Statistical processing revealed significant differences only in the magnitude of the cylinder in the group with against-the-rule astigmatism (p<0.0005). An increase in maximum visual acuity corrected based on subjective test data was noted. With a deviation of the cylinder axis from the correct position by 10-15 degrees, regardless of the type of astigmatism, a significant tendency for a decrease in visual acuity was identified. At the same time, with a deviation of the cylinder axis within 5 degrees, a significant decrease in visual acuity was noted only in with-the-rule astigmatism and counterclockwise deviation. CONCLUSION: To achieve maximum visual acuity in the correction of regular astigmatism, objective method data must be refined with subjective tests. The results of modeling the deviation of the axis of the corrective lens from the proper position can be considered when evaluating the functional outcomes of TIOL implantation.

Short-term outcomes of implanting a retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens in patients with lens and intraocular lens drops.

Lens drop and intraocular lens (IOL) drop can occur after cataract or phacoemulsification surgery, where the IOL is dislocated from the capsular bag into the vitreous cavity. The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term outcomes of implanting a retropupillary iris-claw in patients with IOL drop and lens drop after phacoemulsification. A cross-sectional study was conducted at Santosa Hospital, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia, from January 2020 to December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: IOL drop and lens drop groups. Total sampling was used, involving 51 patients in the present study, with 27 patients in the IOL drop group and 24 patients in the lens drop group. Data collected included age, sex, eye laterality, the onset of IOL drop or lens drop, intraocular pressure (IOP), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), record of astigmatism change preoperative and postoperative, and postoperative pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) complications. Our data indicated that the UDVA significantly improved in both IOL drop and lens drop groups after PPV surgery (p<0.001). However, there were no significant changes in IOP or astigmatism following the surgery in either group. Over one month, both groups showed improved UDVA, decreased IOP, and changes in astigmatism, with no significant differences between groups. Similarly, there was no significant difference in CDVA between IOL drop and lens drop groups. Only four complications were recorded in the present study. Comparing IOL drop and lens drop groups, only an increase in IOP showed a significant difference (p=0.018). Corneal edema, IOL decentration, and pupil ovalization were not significantly different. In conclusion, retropupillary iris-claw IOL implantation is safe and effective for aphakic patients with complications from phacoemulsification, regardless of whether it is lens drop or IOL drop.

Comparison of two digital alignment systems for toric intraocular lens implantation.

PURPOSE: To compare the two most used digital alignment systems regarding precision, repeatability and loss of track. METHODS: 15 eyes of 15 patients older than 21 years with cataracts were included in this prospective study. The two systems were intraoperatively superimposed and recorded, and the alignment of the two displayed alignment axes was analysed regarding precision, repeatability and loss of track. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in precision and repeatability between the two digital alignment systems regarding the projected alignment axis. The deviation from the actual target axis was significantly different, with a mean of 0.34°±0.75° for the Zeiss system and 1.60°±1.08° for the Alcon system (p=0.03, n=14). The within-subject SD was significantly lower with 0.21° for the Zeiss system and 0.34° for the Alcon system (p=0.03, n=14). CONCLUSIONS: The Zeiss Callisto system showed a significantly lower deviation from the target axis, higher stability with eye movements and less need for microscope illumination than the Alcon system. Both systems showed high precision when compared with manual marking methods. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05220683.

Axial length and keratometry characteristics of patients undergoing cataract surgery in Saudi Arabia.

Cataract surgery is one of the most successful surgical procedures, mainly due to the recent developments in surgical instruments and intraocular lens (IOL) measurements. Understanding the nature of axial length (AL) and keratometry readings (K) in patients with cataracts has significant implications for accurate postoperative IOL size selection. This study aimed to measure AL and K in patients undergoing cataract surgery in Saudi Arabia. This retrospective study included patients who underwent cataract surgery in Madinah, Saudi Arabia. The medical records of adult patients between May 2022 and May 2023 were reviewed, and those with a history of retinal detachment, refractive surgery, or trauma were excluded. The AL and K readings were obtained from the patient's IOL master results. A total of 691 eyes from 451 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 64.54 years old. Most of the patients were women (55%). The mean AL, K1, and K2 values were 23.27, 43.42, and 44.69, respectively. Linear regression analysis was used to measure the relationship between AL and K, revealing an inverse relationship in our findings. As AL increased by one unit, the mean K was estimated to decrease by 0.548, with a 95% confidence interval. Our results demonstrated an inverse relationship between AL and K, implying that when AL increases, K decreases, or the corneal curvature becomes flat. Further studies are needed to investigate the biomechanical mechanisms underlying this relationship.

A survey of intraocular lens preferences of UK refractive surgeons for cataract surgery and refractive lens exchange.

BACKGROUND: To explore intraocular lens (IOL) preferences of United Kingdom-based (UK) refractive surgeons in cataract and refractive lens exchange (RLE) surgery. METHODS: An online survey on IOL preferences (and reasons for their choice) in cataract and RLE surgery was distributed. It also enquired about implementing mini-monovision with extended depth of field (EDoF) IOLs, about utilising IOL mix-and-match (different IOL types in each eye), and at what level of corneal astigmatism they prefer toric lenses. RESULTS: Following an 81.6% response rate, thirty responses were analysed; median years of refractive surgery experience was 12.5. The most popular IOL choices for cataract surgery were EDoF lenses (30%), monofocals (20%), and trifocals (20%). The most cited reason for each was better overall visual outcomes (88.9%), fewer unwanted symptoms (66.7%) and best spectacle independence (66.7%), respectively. For RLE, EDoF remained most popular (36.7%), followed by trifocals (30%), and multifocals (16.7%) with the same reasons for choice cited above. Mini-monovision with EDoF lenses was well-regarded (83% recommend for most/select patients), unlike utilising IOL mix-and-match (60% did not recommend). 40% prefer toric IOLs for astigmatism of 1 dioptre (D) or higher, whilst 30% opt for them at < 1D. CONCLUSIONS: Experienced UK refractive surgeons prefer newer IOLs with enhanced optics; ≥50% of respondents favoured either EDoF or trifocals for a 'typical' cataract or RLE patient. Notably, respondents have a low corneal astigmatism threshold for toric lenses. Mini-monovision with EDoF IOLs was well-regarded, whilst mix-and-match of different IOL types was less recommended.

Understanding post-operative refractive outcome in pediatrics after IOL implementation: factors and predictors.

BACKGROUND: In pediatric ophthalmology, calculating intra-ocular lens (IOL) power can be challenging. It is important to predict if the post-surgery refractive error (RE) will meet the intended refractive goal. In this study, we aimed to investigate the factors and predictors influencing RE outcomes in children undergoing IOL implantation. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study that involved 47 eyes with congenital cataracts underwent IOL implantation. Each patient underwent follow-up visits at two months and two years' post-surgery. The IOL power calculations were conducted using the Holladay 1 formula, and both the prediction error (PE) and absolute prediction error (APE) were calculated. RESULTS: The mean age was 6.52 ± 4.61 years, with an age range of 1-15 years. The mean IOL power was 20.31 ± 6.57 D, and the mean post-operative refraction was 1.31 ± 2.65 D. The mean of PE and APE were 0.67 ± 1.77 and 1.55 ± 1.06 D, respectively. Whereas PE was correlated to axial length with an R-value of - 0.29 (P = 0.04). The calculation method had a significant negative relationship with APE and PE, with coefficients of - 1.05 (P = 0.009) and - 1.81 (P = 0.009), respectively. CONCLUSION: High astigmatism was associated with greater errors in the refractive outcome. The calculation methods had the most considerable impact on the post-operative RE. The customization of surgical approaches to accommodate individual characteristics is crucial. Further research with diverse subgroups is needed to comprehensively understand the influence of each factor.

Outcomes of retropupillary iris claw lens implantation in patients with intraocular lens dislocation and low (less than 1000 cells/mm2) corneal endothelial cell density.

BACKGROUND: Posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation is a common complication of cataract surgery. Dislocated IOLs often require surgical intervention due to the potentially severe risks of leaving this condition untreated. If a patient with extremely low corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) presents with IOL dislocation, the surgeon faces a crucial dilemma of choosing the most optimal surgical treatment option. We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens (R-IOL) implantation in patients with IOL dislocation and extremely low (< 1000 cells/mm2) ECD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of nine patients (all men) whose pre-operative ECD was < 1000 cells/mm2 and who underwent R-IOL implantation due to intraocular subluxation or total dislocation into the vitreous cavity between 2014 and 2020. We evaluated corneal endothelial function and visual outcomes after surgery. RESULTS: Nine patients were included in this study. The mean age at diagnosis was 64.89 ± 7.15 years (range 57-76 years), and the follow-up duration was 37.93 ± 23.72 months (range 18.07-89.07 months). No patients developed bullous keratopathy during follow-up. Compared to the initial ECD, corneal thickness (CT), coefficient variation of cell area (CV) and percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX), there was no statistically significant decrease in the ECD, CV, and HEX at last follow-up (P = 0.944, 0.778, 0.445, 0.443). There was significant improvement in the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at the last follow-up (average 0.13 logMAR, 20/27 Snellen) compared to the pre-operative mean UDVA (average 1.09 logMAR, 20/250 Snellen) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: R-IOL implantation did not result in a statistically significant decline in corneal endothelial function in patients with preoperatively low ECD, and it significantly improved the mean UDVA postoperatively. R-IOL implantation appears to be a safe and effective treatment modality for intraocular lens dislocation in patients with low ECD (< 1000 cells/mm²); however, long-term follow-up studies are warranted to corroborate these findings.

Clinical Outcomes of Enhanced Monofocal (Mono-EDOF) Intraocular Lenses with the Mini-Monovision Technique versus Trifocal Intraocular Lenses: A Comparative Study

Objectives: It was aimed to compare the clinical results of the mini-monovision technique (MMV) with enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) and trifocal IOL applications and to evaluate the intereye differences in the MMV group. Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational study evaluated the results of cataract surgeries performed on 48 eyes of 24 patients. Surgeries in Group I were performed for MMV using the RayOne EMV IOL targeting emmetropia in dominant eyes (Group IA) and -0.70 diopter (D) myopia in non-dominant eyes (Group IB), while those in Group II were performed with the AcrySof® IQ PanOptixTM TNFT00 IOL targeting emmetropia. After the surgeries, uncorrected and corrected distance, intermediate, and near distance visual acuities, contrast sensitivity measurements, and defocus curves were determined. Subjective evaluation was made with the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25). The groups were compared statistically. Results: Postoperative refraction mean spherical equivalent was -0.25±0.22 D, -0.67±0.33 D, and -0.16±0.31 D in the three groups, respectively. A statistical difference was identified in favor of Group IA for uncorrected distance vision and in favor of Group IB for near vision (p<0.05). There was no difference in bilateral uncorrected visions in Groups I and II (p>0.05). While contrast sensitivity was better in Group I at all spatial frequencies (p<0.05), better vision was achieved in the defocus curve at distance in Group IA and at near in Group IB. In the binocular evaluation, it was seen that Groups I and II had similar results. In the subjective evaluation, NEI-VFQ-25 scores were 94.1±4.2/100 in Group I and 91.5±3.0/100 in Group II at 6 months (p>0.05). Photic complaints were significantly more common in Group II. Conclusion: With the MMV technique, it was observed that enhanced monofocal lenses provided better visual acuity at all distances and less dysphotopsia than trifocal lenses, whereas trifocal lenses were better at providing independence from glasses.

Modified technique for sutured scleral fixated intraocular lens in a patient with post-traumatic aniridia and aphakia: a case report.

BACKGROUND: A modified surgical technique of sutured scleral fixated intraocular lens (SSF-IOL) was applied in a patient with post-traumatic aniridia and aphakia. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old man was referred to our clinic with decreased vision (finger count) in his right eye. This patient had previously undergone primary repair of the ruptured globe and pars plana vitrectomy to manage ocular trauma in the same eye. On presentation, the best corrected visual acuity in his right eye was 20/40. The slit lamp examination of his right eye revealed loss of total iris and lens. Corneal endothelial cell density was 1462 cells/mm2. Fundoscopic examination of the right eye revealed a retinal attachment. For IOL implantation, a rigid poly methyl methacrylate IOL was used with a 2-point scleral fixation performed using a polypropylene suture. One year postoperatively, the uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/32, and the manifest refraction was - 0.5/-1.5 × 130 (20/20). Pentacam revealed that the astigmatism of the anterior corneal surface and the total cornea was 1.1 D (axis: 59.8°) and 1.0 D (axis: 35.6°), respectively. The horizontal (3°-183°) cross-section image displayed an IOL with a 1° tilt and 0.425 mm decentration. The patient reported no dysphotopsia or photophobia and was satisfied with the visual results. OPD-scan III revealed that higher-order aberrations in the right eye were slightly higher than those in the left eye. No suture-related or other serious complications were observed. CONCLUSION: The modified SSF-IOL technique can offer improved visual quality for patients with aniridia and aphakia by ensuring proper IOL positioning and reducing astigmatism.

IOL decentration sensitivity according to spatial frequencies.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Investigation of the decentration sensitivity of monofocal intraocular implants with a focus on different aberration corrections depending on different spatial frequencies. METHODS: Using an optical bench, the decentration sensitivities of an intraocular lens (IOL) with a high spherical aberration correction of -0.27 µm (ZCB00 Johnson & Johnson), an IOL with an aberration correction of -0.20 µm (Primus HD OphthalmoPro) and an IOL with an aberration neutral design (CT Asphina 409MP Carl Zeiss Meditec) were evaluated for Strehl ratio values and for 25, 50 and 100 lp/mm. Two different corneas with +0.13 µm and +0.28 µm were used. The lenses were tested in the best centration and up to a decentration of 0.5 mm. RESULTS: Decentration sensitivity affects high spatial frequencies more than lower ones. The possible decentration sensitivity is determined by the amount of spherical aberration of the cornea. The effective decentration sensitivity is determined by the extent to which these spherical aberrations are compensated. If these are not compensated, there is hardly any decentration sensitivity. CONCLUSION: High spatial frequencies are more affected by decentration sensitivity. The decentration sensitivity of an IOL is determined by the extent to which the spherical aberration of the cornea is corrected.

Functional Design Analysis of Two Current Extended-Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses.

Purpose: To evaluate the differences between two extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses, the Alcon IQ Vivity and the Bausch & Lomb LuxSmart and to compare them with a simple monofocal lens, the Alcon IQ, using a simulation-based approach. Methods: A mathematical lens model was created for each lens type based on a measured surface geometry. The lens model was then used in a raytracer to calculate a refractive power map of the lens and a ray propagation image for the focal zone. Results: The simulations confirm the enhanced depth of focus of these two lenses. There are apparent differences between the models. For the Vivity, more light is directed into the far focus in low light conditions, whereas the LuxSmart behaves more pupil independent and prioritizes intermediate vision. Conclusions: The simulation-based approach was effective in evaluating and comparing the design aspects of these lenses. It can be positioned as a valuable third tool for lens characterization, complementing in vivo studies and in vitro measurements. Translational Relevance: With this approach not only focusing on the resulting optical performance, but the underlying functional mechanisms, it paves the way forward for a better adaptation to the individual needs and preferences of patients.