RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Sri Lanka implemented the National Programme for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis (NPELF) in its endemic regions in 2002. Five annual rounds of mass drug administration using the two-drug combination diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and albendazole led to sustained reductions in infection rates below threshold levels. In 2016, WHO validated that Sri Lanka eliminated lymphatic filariasis as a public health problem. OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of the NPELF on lymphatic filariasis morbidity in Sri Lanka. METHODS: Passive Case Detection (PCD) data maintained in filaria clinic registries from 2006-2022 for lymphoedema and hospital admission data for managing hydroceles/spermatoceles from 2007-2022 were analyzed. The morbidity status in 2022 and trends in overall and district-wise PCD rates were assessed. Poisson log-linear models were used to assess the trends in PCD for endemic regions, including district-wise trends and hospital admissions for the management of hydroceles/spermatoceles. RESULTS: In 2022, there were 566 new lymphoedema case visits. The mean (SD) age was 53.9 (16.0) years. The staging was done for 94% of cases, of which 79% were in the early stages (57.3% and 21.4% in stages two and one, respectively). Western Province had the highest caseload (52%), followed by the Southern (32%) and Northwestern (16%) Provinces, respectively. The reported lymphoedema PCD rate in 2022 was 0.61 per 10,000 endemic population. The overall PCD rate showed a decline of 7.6% (95%CI: 4.9% - 10.3%) per year (P < 0.0001) from 2007 to 2022. A steady decline was observed in Colombo, Gampaha and Kurunegala districts, while Kalutara remained static and other districts showed a decline in recent years. Further, admissions for inpatient management of hydroceles/spermatoceles showed a declining trend after 2015. CONCLUSIONS: The PCD rates of lymphoedema and hydroceles/spermatoceles showed a declining trend in Sri Lanka after the implementation of the NPELF.
Assuntos
Dietilcarbamazina , Filariose Linfática , Filaricidas , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Sri Lanka/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Dietilcarbamazina/uso terapêutico , Dietilcarbamazina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Albendazol/uso terapêutico , Albendazol/administração & dosagem , Saúde Pública , Idoso , Hidrocele Testicular/epidemiologia , Erradicação de Doenças/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Administração Massiva de Medicamentos , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Morbidade/tendências , Criança , Programas Nacionais de SaúdeRESUMO
Lymphedema is known to affect as many as 140 to 250 million people worldwide. Approximately 99% of lymphedemas are secondary cases after lymphadenectomy, radiation, or parasite infection. There has been no accurate estimate of the lymphedema population size in South Korea. This study aimed to quantify the epidemiology of lymphedema in South Korea and analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with lymphedema using a nationwide database. This large-scale cross-sectional study included patients who received one of the following three diagnostic codes - Q82.0 (hereditary lymphedema), I97.2 (breast cancer-related lymphedema), and I89.0 (unclassified lymphedema) from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment service between January 2019 and July 2022 at tertiary hospitals, general hospitals, or other hospitals. The demographics of the lymphedema population, medication use, and medical characteristics were identified. Over the last 4 years, the annual incidence of lymphedema has steadily increased and peaked in 2021 with the number 1.85 out of 1000. Of all patients, 81% were located in the upper extremity, and 10.6% had previous cancer. Most patients were diagnosed in general hospitals (53.2%), at orthopedic surgery department (41.9%). On average, lymphedema patients spent 70.17 US dollar for medication and hospitalized for 16.9 days annually after diagnosis. Commonly prescribed medications were Entelon® (Vitis vinifera seed extract) (66.9%), steroids (40.5%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (26.5%) and diuretics (21.8%). Only 5.7% of patients received surgery and 19.2% received herbal medicine. This is the first study in South Korea to quantify demographic and medical characteristics of lymphedema patients. These results will contribute to a comprehensive understanding of lymphedema diagnosis and treatment in our nation.
Assuntos
Linfedema , Humanos , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Masculino , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Incidência , Adolescente , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Obesity and chronic oedema/lymphoedema are two distinct but related conditions, rarely investigated together. The aim was to study the impact of increased weight on chronic oedema and related factors. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A cross-sectional study, 38 centers, nine countries. Patients with clinically confirmed chronic oedema/lymphoedema of the leg were included. Weight category was estimated as: normal weight (BMI 20-30), class I-II obesity (BMI 30-40), or class III obesity (BMI > 40). Factors were tested for an association with increased weight, using a multivariable model. RESULTS: A total of 7397 patients were included; 43% with normal weight, 36% class I-II obesity and 21% class III obesity. Increased weight was associated with more advanced stages of chronic oedema (ISL stage III; the most advanced form); affecting 14% in normal weight, 18% class I-II obesity and 39% class III obesity (p < 0.001). Ten factors were independently associated with increased weight: diabetes (OR 2.4), secondary lymphoedema (OR 2.7), cellulitis/erysipelas within 12 months (OR 1.2), bilateral lymphoedema (OR 3.6), compression therapy (OR 2.1), increased swelling duration (1-2 years OR 1.3, 2-5 years OR 2.5, 5-10 years OR 3.6, >10 years OR 3.5) decreased mobility (walking with aid OR 1.9, being chair bound OR 1.2) and age (reference<45 years; 45-64 years OR 1.5, 75-84 years OR 0.6, 85+ years OR 0.2). Increased weight was associated with a lower presentation of peripheral arterial disease (OR 0.7) and poorer chronic oedema control (OR 0.8). Patients with obesity had lower function, appearance and more severe symptoms (LYMQOL) and lower quality of life (EuroQol). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity negatively impacts chronic oedema, leading to more advanced stages. Achieving good control of swelling with compression is more difficult in these patients. Increased awareness of chronic oedema/lymphoedema as a complication of obesity is important for early detection and for developing effective strategies to prevent and manage them.
Assuntos
Edema , Linfedema , Obesidade , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Masculino , Feminino , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Perna (Membro)/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Índice de Massa CorporalRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although the association between higher physical activity and preventive effect on breast-cancer-related lymphoedema (BCRL) has been reported, it is unclear what intervention is optimal. We aimed to investigate the effect of exercise and educational programs on BCRL development. METHODS: This study was a secondary endpoint analysis from a prospective randomized controlled trial. We enrolled patients with stage 0-III breast cancer from March 2016 to March 2020 and randomly assigned them to the control (n = 111), education (n = 115), or exercise (n = 104) group. As secondary endpoint, we assessed the incidence of and preventive effect on BCRL at 12 months post-intervention. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the incidence of BCRL at 12 months post-intervention between the exercise and control groups (9.8% and 10.8%, P = 0.83) and the education and control groups (11.6% and 10.8%, P = 1.00). There were no significant differences in time to BCRL onset from the day of surgery between the exercise and control groups (event rate at 12 months: 20.7% and 17.2%, log-rank, P = 0.54) and the education and control groups (18.8% and 17.2%, log-rank, P = 0.57). The multivariable analyses indicated that axillary dissection and obesity significantly increased the risk of BCRL [hazard ratio (HR): 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-3.67 and HR: 1.68, 95% CI 1.07-2.63, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention did not decrease the risk of BCRL, and axillary dissection and obesity were the risk factors of BCRL. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000020595 at UMIN Clinical Trial Registry.
Assuntos
Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama , Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/etiologia , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/prevenção & controle , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/terapia , Exercício Físico , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Idoso , Adulto , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Incidência , Linfedema/etiologia , Linfedema/prevenção & controle , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Mastectomia/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Lymphedema is a progressive lymphatic disease that potentiates physical and psychosocial distress. Despite its impact, patients reportedly encounter lymphatic ignorance throughout the healthcare system. This cross-sectional study aims to summarize clinical characteristics and interactions of lymphedema patients within the healthcare system. Two lymphedema patient cohorts were included: The Global Registry Analysis Cohort included lymphedema patients who contributed to an international digital lymphatic registry and the Interactions Cohort included patients who initiated a questionnaire about interactions with the medical system. The global registry was used to obtain demographic and clinical characteristics from affiliated lymphedema patients. A 23-item online questionnaire on healthcare experiences and satisfaction with lymphatic healthcare was then distributed to the Interactions Cohort. Complete responses were obtained from 2474 participants. Participants were a mean age of 57.5 ± 16.1 years and 51.4% had a cancer history. Participants reported substantial delays in diagnosis and treatment. Cancer-related and non-cancer-related lymphedema patients reported similar levels of perceived physician disinterest in their lymphedema; however, non-cancer-related lymphedema patients reported more care dissatisfaction. Ultimately, patients continue to face delays in lymphedema diagnosis and treatment. We developed an evidence-based model highlighting areas of reform needed to improve lymphatic education and healthcare.
Assuntos
Linfedema , Humanos , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Linfedema/psicologia , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Idoso , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Atenção à Saúde , Satisfação do Paciente , Sistema de Registros , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/psicologiaRESUMO
Introduction: We presented the key findings from Singapore's Changi General Hospital Breast Centre's lymphedema surveillance strategy that used patients' reported symptoms, standard arm circumference measurements and clinical assessment in the diagnosis of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Our secondary aim was to highlight and discuss important elements of a surveillance strategy that can be implemented to track this outcome measure of breast cancer treatment for future research. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 511 breast cancer patients to assess the prevalence of BCRL and its associated risk factors. We defined BCRL prevalence rates based on patients' self-reporting, objective arm circumference measure-ments and clinical diagnosis based on International Society of Lymphology (ISL) staging. Results: The median follow-up of patients was 88.8 months. The cumulative prevalence rate in the cohort was 30.9%. The cohort of BCRL patients were older (58.4 versus [vs] 54.9 years), had higher mean Body Mass Index (27.7 vs 25.2), higher proportion of mastectomy (77% vs 64.3%), axillary clearance, less likely breast reconstruction, higher-grade tumour, more lymph nodes excised, more advanced nodal disease, and had undergone adjuvant chemotherapy. However, clinically apparent BCRL was only 6.5% (33 out of 511 patients). The proportion of clinically significant BCRL in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary sampling was 1.7% compared to 9.9% in patients who had undergone axillary clearance. Majority of the BCRL were subclinical or mild in severity. Conclusion: Our study showed that our rates of BCRL were comparable to international rates and highlighted similar patient profiles who were at risk of developing the disease. Having a comprehensive lymphedema surveillance strategy is paramount in paving the way for future studies.
Assuntos
Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Transversais , Fatores de Risco , Singapura/epidemiologia , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/epidemiologia , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/diagnóstico , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/etiologia , Mastectomia/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Braço , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Linfedema/etiologia , Linfedema/diagnóstico , Autorrelato , Vigilância da População/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Natural language understanding (NLU) may be particularly well equipped for enhanced data capture from the electronic health record given its examination of both content-driven and context-driven extraction. METHODS: We developed and applied a NLU model to examine rates of pathological node positivity (pN+) and rates of lymphedema to determine whether omission of routine axillary staging could be extended to younger patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/cN0 disease. RESULTS: We found that rates of pN+ and arm lymphedema were similar between patients age 55-69 years and ≥70 years, with rates of lymphedema exceeding rates of pN+ for clinical stage T1c and smaller disease. CONCLUSION: Data from our NLU model suggest that omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy might be extended beyond Choosing Wisely recommendations, limited to those older than 70 years and to all postmenopausal women with early-stage ER+/cN0 disease. These data support the recently reported SOUND trial results and provide additional granularity to facilitate surgical de-escalation.
Assuntos
Axila , Neoplasias da Mama , Processamento de Linguagem Natural , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Linfedema/etiologia , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Metástase Linfática , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgiaRESUMO
Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is the most prevalent comorbidity that occurs following breast cancer treatments and has negative impact on the patients' quality of life (QoL). The Lymphedema Functioning, Disability, and Health Questionnaire for Upper Limb Lymphedema (Lymph-ICF-UL) is a valid and reliable instrument in assessing the QoL of patients with BCRL. However, the Bahasa Malaysia (BM) version is not available yet. This study aimed to translate the Lymph-ICF-UL into BM and to evaluate its validity and reliability. Methods and Results: A forward-backward translation was performed based on Sousa's guideline, and then, the face, content, construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were tested. Face validity was assessed by five patients, and content validity was evaluated by six experts. Then, construct validity and internal validity were assessed in 107 patients. Finally, test-retest reliability was analyzed in 21 patients. Two items were eliminated following suggestions from the patients and experts. All patients found the scoring system and items clear and relevant. The results showed sufficient content validity index and modified kappa statistics value. Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable fit indices. Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.67 to 0.95, intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.88 to 0.99, standard error measurement was 2.29-6.15, and the Bland-Altman plot showed an agreement between two test occasions. Conclusion: These results suggested that the Lymph-ICF-UL BM has good validity and reliability in evaluating the QoL of patients with BCRL in Malaysia.
Assuntos
Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama , Psicometria , Qualidade de Vida , Extremidade Superior , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Malásia/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/diagnóstico , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/epidemiologia , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/psicologia , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/etiologia , Extremidade Superior/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Linfedema/etiologia , Linfedema/diagnóstico , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Linfedema/psicologia , Avaliação da Deficiência , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , TraduçãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Treatment for melanoma after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy includes nodal observation or lymphadenectomy. Important considerations for management, however, involve balancing the risk of recurrence and the risk of lymphedema after lymphadenectomy. METHODS: From the Merative MarketScan Research Databases, adult patients were queried from 2007 to 2021. International Classification of Disease, Ninth (ICD-9) and Tenth (ICD-10) Editions, diagnosis codes and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients with melanoma diagnoses who underwent an index melanoma excision with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Main outcomes were completion lymph node dissection (CLND) utilization after a positive SLNB, developing lymphedema with or without CLND, and nodal basin recurrence 3 months or more after index excision. Subanalyses stratified by index excision year (2007-2017 and 2018-2021) and propensity score matched were additionally conducted. Demographics and comorbidities (measured by Elixhauser index) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 153,085,453 patients were identified. Of those, 359,298 had a diagnosis of melanoma, and 202,456 patients underwent an excision procedure. The study cohort comprised 3717 patients with a melanoma diagnosis who underwent an excision procedure and had a positive SLNB. The mean age of the study cohort was 49 years, 57% were male, 41% were geographically located in the South, and 24% had an Elixhauser index of 4+. Among the 350 patients who did not undergo CLND, 10% experienced recurrence and 22% developed lymphedema. A total of 3367 patients underwent CLND, of which 8% experienced recurrence and 20% developed lymphedema. Completion lymph node dissection did not significantly affect risk of recurrence [odds ratio (OR), 1.370, P = 0.090] or lymphedema (OR, 1.114, P = 0.438). After stratification and propensity score matching, odds of experiencing lymphedema (OR, 1.604, P = 0.058) and recurrence (OR, 1.825, P = 0.058) after CLND were not significantly affected. Rates of CLND had significantly decreased (P < 0.001) overtime, without change in recurrence rate (P = 0.063). CONCLUSIONS: Electing for nodal observation does not increase the risk of recurrence or reduce risk of lymphedema. Just as CLND does not confer survival benefit, its decreased utilization has not increased recurrence rate.
Assuntos
Linfedema , Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Melanoma/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/efeitos adversos , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Linfedema/etiologia , Linfedema/cirurgia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a potentially disabling and often irreversible consequence of breast cancer treatment, caused by the mechanical incompetence of the lymphatic system, resulting in reduced drainage capacity and functional overload due to an excessive volume of interstitial fluid surpassing the system's transport capacity in the arm. We wanted to determine the impact and explore the differences in independent risk factors for the occurrence of BCRL; incidence of BCRL over a five-year period at the Institute of Oncology Vojvodina in Sremska Kamenica and to answer the research question regarding the influence of the prehabilitation program on the overall incidence of BCRL during the observed five-year period. METHODS: From 2014 to 2018, a retrospective study was conducted at the Institute of Oncology of Vojvodina in Sremska Kamenica, analyzing female patients who had undergone breast cancer surgery. RESULTS: The study included 150 breast cancer patients who developed secondary lymphedema following surgery with the mean age of 59.2 ± 11.3 years. Fluctuations in hospitalization rates were observed over the five-year period, with the highest number of admissions in 2014 (24.0%) and a decline in 2018 (14.0%). The most common surgical procedure performed was left quadrantectomy (24.0%), followed by right quadrantectomy (20.0%) and left amputation (15.3%). The mean number of removed lymph nodes was 15.2 ± 6.1, with no statistically significant association between the number of removed lymph nodes and the manifestation of secondary lymphedema. The severity of secondary lymphedema varied based on patient age, with a higher incidence of moderate and severe lymphedema observed in patients aged 61 years and older. Patients who underwent radical surgery were more likely to experience severe lymphedema compared to those who had conservative surgery, although this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In our study, the type of surgery, elapsed time since surgery, and the number of removed lymph nodes were not influencing factors for the occurrence of BCRL. However, concerning its severity, a greater number of systemic therapy modalities combined with radiotherapy were associated with a more frequent occurrence of mild and moderate BCRL. Also, the severity of BCRL varied among different age groups, with a higher incidence of moderate and severe lymphedema observed in patients aged 61 years and older. Ultimately, improving the quality of life for individuals affected by secondary lymphedema remains a crucial goal in the field of oncology.
Assuntos
Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama , Neoplasias da Mama , Sobreviventes de Câncer , Linfedema , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Linfedema/etiologia , Linfedema/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/epidemiologia , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/complicações , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To clarify how body mass index (BMI) affects the development and temporal trend of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). METHODS: This is a prospective study in which patients with operable breast cancer were registered in a single institute between November 2009 and July 2010. The incidence of lymphedema at 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery was assessed according to BMI, and the trend of newly developed BCRL was examined. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥25 in accordance with the Japan Society for the Study of Obesity. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients were included in this study. The multivariate analysis of the whole population showed that high BMI, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy remained as risk factors for BCRL. Patients with high BMI showed a significantly higher incidence of new lymphedema than those with low BMI at 1 year (p < 00.001) regardless of axillary procedures (39.1 % vs 16.3 % for axillary dissection; 15.6 % vs 1.5 % for sentinel lymph node biopsy) but not at 3 and 5 years. Once BCRL developed, patients with high BMI showed slow recovery and 50.0 % of the patients retained edema at 5 years while patients with low BMI showed rapid recovery and 26.7 % retained after 3 years (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The preoperative BMI affected the incidence and temporal trend of BCRL regardless of axillary procedures or radiotherapy. Patients with high BMI should be given appropriate information about BCRL before surgery with careful follow-up for BCRL after treatment.
Assuntos
Axila , Índice de Massa Corporal , Neoplasias da Mama , Excisão de Linfonodo , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso , Incidência , Fatores de Risco , Adulto , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/epidemiologia , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/etiologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Obesidade/complicações , Fatores de Tempo , Linfedema/etiologia , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Mastectomia , Japão/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with lymphedema and lipedema share physical exam findings that may lead to misdiagnosis. Poor mobility is common in patients with obesity and patients with lymphedema and lipedema. This may constitute a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Our objective was to evaluate the association of VTE in obese patients with lymphedema and lipedema. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was searched from 2016 to 2020 to identify hospital admissions of obese female patients with lymphedema and lipedema. Patients were analyzed in the context of presence or absence of VTE while adjusting for complex cluster sampling techniques. Predictors of VTE were accessed by multivariable regression. RESULTS: Lymphedema was identified in 189,985 patients and lipedema in 50,645 patients. VTE was observed in 3.12% (n = 374,210) of patients with obesity. In patients with obesity, VTE was more common in patients with lymphedema than without (2.6% vs 1.6%; p < 0.01). Similarly, VTE was more common in patients with lipedema than without (0.6% vs 0.4%; p < 0.01). After multivariable logistic regression, VTE events in obese patients with lymphedema were higher versus without (OR 1.6; CI 1.08-2.43; p = 0.02). Similarly, VTE events were more common in obese patients with lipedema versus obese patients without lipedema (OR 1.20; CI 1.03-1.41; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this hypothesis-generating study, lymphedema and lipedema show a positive association with VTE after adjusting for baseline patient characteristics such as obesity, which is a known independent risk factor for VTE. Mechanisms whereby lymphedema and lipedema are associated with VTE should be investigated.
Assuntos
Lipedema , Linfedema , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Feminino , Lipedema/diagnóstico , Lipedema/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Pacientes Internados , Linfedema/diagnóstico , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/diagnóstico , Obesidade/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine the demographics, outcomes, and healthcare utilization of patients with chronic venous insufficiency-associated lymphedema (CVI-LED) and the prevalence of lymphedema-specific therapy use after venous intervention. METHODS: The IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Claims Databases were examined for patients with CVI-LED. Patient demographics and the use of lymphedema-specific therapy before and after venous intervention were collected. RESULTS: Of 85,601 LED patients identified, 8,406 also had a diagnosis of CVI. In the CVI-LED group, 1051 underwent endovenous ablation or venous stent placement. The use of lymphedema-specific therapy before and after venous intervention was 52% and 39%, respectively (p < .05). The mean time of initiation of LED-specific therapy following venous intervention was 265 days after ablation and 347 days after stent placement. CONCLUSION: Treating venous hypertension improves certain venous-related signs and symptoms of CVI. However, a significant proportion of patients have persistent edema which may reflect underlying, sub-optimally treated LED.
Assuntos
Linfedema , Insuficiência Venosa , Humanos , Insuficiência Venosa/terapia , Insuficiência Venosa/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Prevalência , Linfedema/economia , Linfedema/terapia , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica , Adulto , Stents/economia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
PURPOSE: Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL), which causes ankle, leg, and feet swelling, poses a significant challenge for endometrial cancer survivors, impacting physical functioning and psychological well-being. Inconsistent LEL diagnostic methods result in wide-ranging LEL incidence estimates. METHODS: We calculated the cumulative incidence of LEL based on survivor-reported Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) responses in addition to survivor- and nurse-reported leg circumference measurements among a pilot sample of 50 endometrial cancer survivors (27 White, 23 Black) enrolled in the ongoing population-based Carolina Endometrial Cancer Study. RESULTS: Self-leg circumference measurements were perceived to be difficult and were completed by only 17 survivors. Diagnostic accuracy testing measures (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value) compared the standard nurse-measured ≥ 10% difference in leg circumference measurements to GCLQ responses. At a mean of ~11 months post-diagnosis, 54% of survivors met established criteria for LEL based on ≥ 4 GCLQ cutpoint while 24% had LEL based on nurse-measurement. Percent agreement, sensitivity, and specificity approximated 60% at a threshold of ≥ 5 GCLQ symptoms. However, Cohen's kappa, a measure of reliability that corrects for agreement by chance, was highest at ≥ 4 GCLQ symptoms (κ = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasize the need for high quality measurements of LEL that are feasible for epidemiologic study designs among endometrial cancer survivors. Future studies should use patient-reported survey measures to assess lymphedema burden and quality of life outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors.
Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Neoplasias do Endométrio , Linfedema , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias do Endométrio/complicações , Neoplasias do Endométrio/psicologia , Sobreviventes de Câncer/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Linfedema/etiologia , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Linfedema/diagnóstico , Linfedema/psicologia , Idoso , Inquéritos e Questionários , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Adulto , IncidênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lymphoedema is a globally neglected health care problem and a common complication following breast cancer treatment. Lymphoedema is a well-known predisposing factor for cellulitis, but few have investigated the risk factors for cellulitis in this patient cohort on an international level. The aim of this study was to identify the frequency of cellulitis in patients with lymphoedema of the arm, including potential risk factors for cellulitis. METHODS: An international, multi-centre, cross-sectional study including patients with clinically assessed arm lymphoedema. The primary outcome was the incidence of cellulitis located to the arm with lymphoedema within the last 12 months, and its potential associated risk factors. The secondary outcome was life-time prevalence of cellulitis. Adults with clinically-assessed arm lymphoedema/chronic oedema (all causes) and able to give informed consent were included. End-of-life-patients or those judged as not in the patient's best interest were excluded. Both univariable and multivariable analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 2160 patients were included from Australia, Denmark, France, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Turkey and United Kingdom. Secondary lymphoedema was present in 98% of the patients; 95% of these were judged as related to cancer or its treatment. The lifetime prevalence of cellulitis was 22% and 1-year incidence 11%. Following multivariable analysis, factors associated with recent cellulitis were longer swelling duration and having poorly controlled lymphoedema. Compared to having lymphoedema less than 1 year, the risk increased with duration: 1-2 years (OR 2.15), 2-5 years (OR 2.86), 5-10 years (OR 3.15). Patients with well-controlled lymphoedema had a 46% lower risk of cellulitis (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.39-0.73, p < 0.001). More advanced stages of lymphoedema were associated with cellulitis even after adjustment for swelling duration and control of swelling by logistic regression (stage II OR 5.44, stage III OR 9.13, p = 0.002), demonstrated in a subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced arm lymphoedema are at particular risk of developing cellulitis. Prevention of lymphoedema progression is crucial. The results lend towards a positive effect of having well-treated lymphoedema on the frequency of cellulitis.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Linfedema , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Celulite (Flegmão)/epidemiologia , Celulite (Flegmão)/complicações , Estudos Transversais , Braço , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Linfedema/etiologia , Edema/complicações , Neoplasias da Mama/complicaçõesRESUMO
PURPOSE: The study aimed to describe the prevalence, severity, and trajectory of internal lymphedema, external lymphedema, and fibrosis in patients with oral cavity or oropharyngeal (OCOP) cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred twenty patients with newly diagnosed OCOP cancer were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal study. Recruitment was conducted at a comprehensive medical center. Participants were assessed pretreatment; at end of treatment; and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-cancer treatment. Validated clinician-reported measures and computed tomography were used to assess the study outcomes. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients who completed the 9- or 12-month assessments were included in this report. Examination of the external lymphedema and fibrosis trajectories revealed that the total severity score peaked between the end of treatment and 3 months posttreatment and then decreased gradually over time but did not return to baseline by 12 months posttreatment (P < .001). The longitudinal patterns of severity scores for patients treated with surgery only or with multimodality therapy were similar. Examination of the internal swelling trajectories revealed that all patients experienced a significant increase in sites with swelling immediately posttreatment. For patients treated with surgery only, swelling was minimal and returned to baseline by 9 to 12 months posttreatment. Patients receiving multimodal treatment experienced a gradual decrease in number of sites with swelling during the 12-month posttreatment period that remained significantly above baseline (P < .05). Computed tomography revealed different patterns of changes in prevertebral soft tissue and epiglottic thickness in the surgery-only and multimodality treatment groups during the 12-month posttreatment period. There were minimal changes in thickness in both regions in the surgery-only group. Patients with multimodal treatment had significant increases in thickness in both regions 3 months posttreatment that remained thicker at 12 months than at baseline (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Lymphedema and fibrosis are the common complications of OCOP cancer therapy. Routine assessment, monitoring, and timely treatment of lymphedema and fibrosis are critical.
Assuntos
Linfedema , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Longitudinais , Linfedema/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Linfedema/etiologia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/terapia , Fibrose , BocaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were: to define the incidence of cellulitis in patients with lymphedema (LED) overall and relate this to the etiology of LED; to determine how this rate might be affected by recurrence of cellulitis; and to quantify the contemporary economic burden of treatment. Understanding these factors is essential in developing targeted cellulitis prevention strategies and reducing health care costs. METHODS: The IBM MarketScan Research Database was examined from April 2013 to March 2019 for patients with a new diagnosis of LED (n = 85,601). Based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/ICD-10 diagnosis codes, the incidence and cost of cellulitis were ascertained during the 3-year follow-up period. Incidence rates (per 100 patient-years [PYs]) and cost (per patient per year) of cellulitis were evaluated among all patients with LED and within subgroups of LED etiologies. RESULTS: Among the three most common morbidities associated with LED (breast cancer-related lymphedema [BCRL], n = 17,954 [20.97%]; gynecological cancer-related LED [GCRL], n = 1256 [1.47%]; and phlebolymphedema [PLED], n = 8406 [9.82%]), rates of cellulitis were markedly lower for BCRL (8.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.7-9.2) and GCRL (14.8; 95% CI, 13.4-16.4) vs PLED (47.7; 95% CI, 46.7-48.8). Patients with a history of cellulitis had markedly higher cellulitis rates during follow-up than those without-overall, 74.0% vs 16.4%; BCRL, 42.9%; 95% CI, 39.7%-46.3% vs 7.6%; 95% CI, 7.3%-7.9%; GCRL, 67.5%; 95% CI, 56.4%-80.8% vs 11.0%; 95% CI, 9.8%-12.4%; and PLED, 81.7%; 95% CI, 79.4%-84.1% vs 30.4%; 95% CI, 29.4%-31.4%, respectively. The mean $/patient/year of cellulitis-related costs for a patient with PLED ($2836; 95% CI, $2395-$3471) was significantly greater than that for BCRL ($503; 95% CI, $212-$1387) and GCRL ($609; 95% CI, $244-$1314). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of cellulitis associated with LED varies by the etiology of LED. PLED has the highest rates of both an initial cellulitis episode and recurrent cellulitis events. Additionally, PLED has one of the largest cellulitis-related total costs per patient per year. Prevention, as well as early identification and treatment of PLED-associated cellulitis, could significantly decrease health care costs and improve patient quality of life.
Assuntos
Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama , Etilenodiaminas , Linfedema , Humanos , Celulite (Flegmão)/diagnóstico , Celulite (Flegmão)/epidemiologia , Celulite (Flegmão)/complicações , Incidência , Qualidade de Vida , Linfedema/diagnóstico , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Linfedema/terapiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) could be a risk factor for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) associated with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 596 patients with cT0-4N0-3M0 breast cancer who underwent ALND and chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed between March 2012 and March 2022. NAC was administered in 188 patients (31.5%), while up-front surgery in 408 (68.5%). Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to determine whether NAC was an independent risk factor for BCRL. With propensity score matching (PSM), the NAC group and up-front surgery group were matched 1:1 by age, body mass index (BMI), molecular subtypes, type of breast surgery, and the number of positive lymph nodes. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed for BCRL between groups before and after PSM. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore whether NAC differed for BCRL occurrence in people with different characteristics. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 36.3 months, 130 patients (21.8%) experienced BCRL [NAC, 50/188 (26.60%) vs. up-front surgery, 80/408 (19.61%); P = 0.030]. Multivariable analysis identified that NAC [hazard ratio, 1.503; 95% CI (1.03, 2.19); P = 0.033] was an independent risk factor for BCRL. In addition, the hormone receptor-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR-/HER2-) subtype, breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and increased positive lymph nodes significantly increased BCRL risk. After PSM, NAC remained a risk factor for BCRL [hazard ratio, 1.896; 95% CI (1.18, 3.04); P = 0.007]. Subgroup analyses showed that NAC had a consistent BCRL risk in most clinical subgroups. CONCLUSION: NAC receipt has a statistically significant increase in BCRL risk in patients with ALND. These patients should be closely monitored and may benefit from early BCRL intervention.
Assuntos
Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama , Neoplasias da Mama , Linfedema , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/epidemiologia , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/etiologia , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/patologia , Axila/patologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/efeitos adversos , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Linfedema/etiologia , Linfedema/patologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To examine the current evidence on breast lymphedema (BL) diagnosis and treatment after breast-conserving surgery, identify gaps in the literature, and propose future research directions. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using Ovid, PubMed, and Cochrane, including studies published between 2000 and 2023. References were reviewed manually for eligible studies. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients who underwent breast conserving treatment (surgery ± radiation) for breast cancer, goals of the paper included analyzing or reviewing BL measurement with ultrasound or tissue dielectric constant, or BL treatment. Twenty-seven manuscripts were included in the review. RESULTS: There is variation in incidence, time course, and risk factors for BL. Risk factors for BL included breast size, primary and axillary surgery extent, radiation, and chemotherapy but require further investigation. Diagnostic methods for BL currently rely on patient report and lack standardized criteria. Tissue dielectric constant (TDC) and ultrasound (US) emerged as promising ambulatory BL assessment tools; however, diagnostic thresholds and validation studies with ICG lymphography are needed to establish clinical utility. The evidence base for treatment of BL is weak, lacking high-quality studies. CONCLUSION: The natural history of BL is not well defined. TDC and US show promise as ambulatory assessment tools for BL; however, further validation with lymphatic imaging is required. BL treatment is not established in the literature. Longitudinal, prospective studies including pre-radiation measurements and validating with lymphatic imaging are required. These data will inform screening, diagnostic criteria, and evidence-based treatment parameters for patients with BL after breast-conserving surgery and radiation.
Assuntos
Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama , Neoplasias da Mama , Linfedema , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Linfedema/diagnóstico , Linfedema/epidemiologia , Linfedema/etiologia , Mastectomia Segmentar/efeitos adversos , Axila , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/diagnóstico , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/epidemiologia , Linfedema Relacionado a Câncer de Mama/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the key mental health indicators affecting people affected by lymphatic filariasis (LF) lymphoedema by assessing the prevalence of depressive symptoms and quality of life (QOL), identifying associated sociodemographic and clinical risk factors, and evaluating the impact of an enhanced self-care intervention for lymphoedema management. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of adults with filarial lymphoedema from two regions of Malawi was conducted over six months in 2021. Depressive symptoms and QOL were assessed using Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and LF Specific QOL Questionnaire, respectively, at baseline (pre-intervention), 3- and 6-months (postintervention). Beta regression analysis identified risk factors, and assessed the impact of the intervention. RESULTS: Three hundred eleven affected individuals were surveyed with 23% (95% CI 18%-29%) reporting mild/moderate depressive symptoms and 31% (95% CI 26%-37%) reporting moderately low/low QOL. Higher depressive symptom scores were associated with high frequency of acute filarial attack episodes. Individuals with higher depressive symptoms (Adjusted Odds Ratios (AOR) 0.93, 95% CI 0.93-0.93) and lower QOL (AOR 0.98, 0.98-0.98) showed greatest improvement in mental health indicators over 3-months but was not sustained to the same level at 6-months. CONCLUSIONS: Sustained morbidity management and psychological support is recommended for affected persons to ensure long-term positive mental health and clinical outcomes. CONTEXTE: Cette étude vise à déterminer les principaux indicateurs de santé mentale affectant les personnes atteintes de lymphÅdème dû à la filariose lymphatique (FL) en évaluant la prévalence des symptômes dépressifs et la qualité de vie (QV), en identifiant les facteurs de risque sociodémographiques et cliniques associés, et en évaluant l'impact d'une intervention améliorée d'autosoins pour la gestion du lymphÅdème. MÉTHODES: Une étude de cohorte prospective d'adultes atteints de lymphoedème filaire dans deux régions du Malawi a été menée pendant six mois en 2021. Les symptômes dépressifs et la qualité de vie ont été évalués à l'aide du questionnaire sur la santé des patients (PHQ-9) et du questionnaire sur la qualité de vie spécifique au lymphÅdème, respectivement, au début de l'étude (avant l'intervention), et à 3 puis 6 mois après l'intervention. Une analyse de régression beta a permis d'identifier les facteurs de risque et d'évaluer l'impact de l'intervention. RÉSULTATS: Trois cent onze personnes affectées ont été interrogées, dont 23% (95% CI 18%-29%) ont déclaré des symptômes dépressifs légers/modérés et 31% (95% CI 26%-37%) ont déclaré une qualité de vie modérément faible/faible. Des scores élevés de symptômes dépressifs ont été associés à une fréquence élevée d'épisodes de crises filariennes aiguës. Les personnes présentant des symptômes dépressifs plus élevés (rapport de cotes ajusté (RCA) 0.93, IC à 95 % 0.93-0.93) et une qualité de vie plus faible (RCA 0.98, 0.98-0.98) ont montré la plus grande amélioration des indicateurs de santé mentale au cours des trois mois, mais cette amélioration ne s'est pas maintenue au même niveau au cours des six mois suivants. CONCLUSION: Gestion de la morbidité et soutien psychologique sont des éléments clés pour garantir une santé mentale et des résultats cliniques satisfaisants de personnes atteintes sur le long terme. ANTECEDENTES: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo determinar los indicadores clave de salud mental que afectan a las personas afectadas por linfedema por filariasis linfática (FL) mediante la evaluación de la prevalencia de síntomas depresivos y calidad de vida (CdV), la identificación de factores de riesgo sociodemográficos y clínicos asociados, y la evaluación del impacto de una intervención de autocuidado mejorada para el manejo del linfedema. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio prospectivo de cohortes de adultos con linfedema filarial de dos regiones de Malawi durante seis meses en 2021. Los síntomas depresivos y la calidad de vida se evaluaron mediante el Cuestionario de Salud del Paciente (PHQ-9) y el Cuestionario de Calidad de Vida específico para el LF Cuestionario, respectivamente, al inicio (preintervención) y a los 3 y 6 meses (posintervención). El análisis de regresión beta identificó los factores de riesgo y evaluó el impacto de la intervención. RESULTADOS: Se encuestó a 311 afectados, de los cuales el 23% (IC 95%, 18%-29%) presentaba síntomas depresivos leves/moderados y el 31% (IC 95%, 26%-37%) una CdV moderadamente baja/baja CdV. Las puntuaciones más altas de síntomas depresivos se asociaron con una alta frecuencia de episodios de ataques agudos de filarias. Los individuos con mayores síntomas depresivos (Odds Ratios Ajustados [ORA] 0.93; IC 95%: 0.93-0.93) y menor CdV (ORA 0.98; 0.98-0.98) mostraron la mayor mejoría en los indicadores de salud mental a los 3 meses, pero no se mantuvo al mismo nivel a los 6 meses. CONCLUSIONES: Se recomienda el manejo sostenido de la morbilidad y el apoyo psicológico a las personas afectadas para garantizar resultados clínicos y de salud mental positivos a largo plazo.