Reduced risk for Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection observed in older adults with hybrid immunity.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid SARS-CoV-2 immunity may provide longer duration protection against severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation than purely vaccine-derived immunity. Older adults represent a high-risk group for severe disease, yet available data is skewed towards younger adults. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study at a large London long-term care facility (LTCF) was conducted from March 2020 to April 2022 to assess the effect of hybrid versus vaccine-only immunity on SARS-CoV-2 infection in older adults during Omicron variant dominance. Hybrid immunity was assessed by a combination of SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing weekly (asymptomatic screening) and as required (symptomatic testing), as well as serial SARS-CoV-2 serology. RESULTS: 280 participants (median age 82 yrs, IQR 76-88 yrs; 95.4% male) were followed up. 168/280 (60%) had evidence of hybrid immunity prior to the Omicron variant wave. Participants with hybrid immunity had substantially lower odds of acquiring COVID-19 infection during the Omicron wave compared to those with vaccine-only immunity (unadjusted odds ratio 0.26, 95% CI 0.14-0.47, chi-squared P < .0001). Participants with hybrid immunity had an odds ratio of 0.40 (0.19-0.79) for asymptomatic infection and 0.15 (0.06-0.34) for symptomatic infection (Likelihood ratio test, P < .0001). DISCUSSION: Our data highlight potential opportunities to target ongoing booster vaccination campaigns for those most at risk of severe infection. Reporting of data in older adults will be of particular value to examine the effect of hybrid immunity as new variants continue to emerge and vaccination strategies evolve.

Pride: not just a celebration.

As part of the nationwide celebration of Pride Month in June, BVLGBT+ met at BVA HQ before joining the annual Pride parade through London. Its president, Charlotte McCarroll, reflects on the importance of these events for the LGBTQ+ community.

Homes Heat Health protocol: an observational cohort study measuring the effect of summer temperatures on sleep quality.

INTRODUCTION: Quality sleep is essential to our health and well-being. Summertime temperatures in the bedrooms of homes in temperate climates are increasing, especially in city apartments. There is very little empirical evidence of the effect of temperature on sleep when people are sleeping in their own bedroom. The Homes Heat Health project seeks to develop a measurable definition of temperature-related sleep disturbance and the effects on health, and so produce a credible criterion for identifying overheating in new and existing homes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A cohort of at least 95 people that live in London apartments and who are free of significant personal and health factors that could affect sleep are being recruited for an ongoing observational cohort study. A baseline questionnaire determines their customary sleep patterns and health. The geometrical form and thermal characteristics of their apartments is being recorded along with temperature, relative humidity and in some apartments CO2 levels, throughout one summer. Actigraphy records nightly sleep disturbance and every morning an app-based diary captures perceived sleep quality. Questionnaires following spells of hot weather capture changes in sleep pattern, sleep quality, and consequential health and well-being. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Loughborough University ethics committee. The participants will receive both verbal and written information explaining the purpose of the study, what is expected of them, the incentives for participating and the feedback that will be provided. The results will be reported bi-annually to a project advisory board. Presentations will be made at conferences and the methods, intermediary and final results, in academic journals. Informing government bodies, professional organisations, construction industry representatives and housing providers is of particular importance.

The impact of continuous lenalidomide maintenance treatment on people living with multiple myeloma-a single-centre, qualitative service evaluation study.

PURPOSE: Continuous lenalidomide maintenance treatment after autologous stem cell transplantation delivers improvement in progression free and overall survival among newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients and has been the standard of care in the UK since March 2021. However, there is scant information about its impact on patients' day-to-day lives. This service evaluation aimed to qualitatively assess patients receiving lenalidomide treatment at a cancer centre in London, in order that the service might better align with needs and expectations of patients. METHODS: We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews among myeloma patients who were on continuous lenalidomide maintenance treatment at a specialist cancer centre in London. Members of the clinical team identified potentially eligible participants to take part, and convenience sampling was used to select 10 male and 10 female patients, median age of 58 (range, 45-71). The median treatment duration was 11 months (range, 1-60 months). Participants were qualitatively interviewed following the same semi-structured interview guide, which was designed to explore patient experience and insights of lenalidomide. Reflexive thematic analysis was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Four overarching themes were as follows: (i) lenalidomide: understanding its role and rationale; (ii) reframing the loss of a treatment-free period to a return to normal life; (iii) the reality of being on lenalidomide: balancing hopes with hurdles; (iv) gratitude and grievances: exploring mixed perceptions of care and communication. Results will be used to enhance clinical services by tailoring communication to better meet patients' preferences when making treatment decisions. CONCLUSION: This study highlights that most patients feel gratitude for being offered continuous lenalidomide and perceive it as alleviating some fears concerning relapse. It reveals variations in side effects in different age groups; younger patients reported no/negligible side effects, whilst several older patients with comorbidities described significant symptom burden, occasionally leading to treatment discontinuation which caused distress at the perceived loss of prolonged remission. Future research should prioritise understanding the unique needs of younger patients living with multiple myeloma.

Application of information from external data to correct for collider bias in a Covid-19 hospitalised cohort.

BACKGROUND: Throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, researchers have made use of electronic health records to research this disease in a rapidly evolving environment of questions and discoveries. These studies are prone to collider bias as they restrict the population of Covid-19 patients to only those with severe disease. Inverse probability weighting is typically used to correct for this bias but requires information from the unrestricted population. Using electronic health records from a South London NHS trust, this work demonstrates a method to correct for collider bias using externally sourced data while examining the relationship between minority ethnicities and poor Covid-19 outcomes. METHODS: The probability of inclusion within the observed hospitalised cohort was modelled based on estimates from published national data. The model described the relationship between patient ethnicity, hospitalisation, and death due to Covid-19 - a relationship suggested to be susceptible to collider bias. The obtained probabilities (as applied to the observed patient cohort) were used as inverse probability weights in survival analysis examining ethnicity (and covariates) as a risk factor for death due to Covid-19. RESULTS: Within the observed cohort, unweighted analysis of survival suggested a reduced risk of death in those of Black ethnicity - differing from the published literature. Applying inverse probability weights to this analysis amended this aberrant result to one more compatible with the literature. This effect was consistent when the analysis was applied to patients within only the first wave of Covid-19 and across two waves of Covid-19 and was robust against adjustments to the modelled relationship between hospitalisation, patient ethnicity, and death due to Covid-19 made as part of a sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this analysis demonstrates the feasibility of using external publications to correct for collider bias (or other forms of selection bias) induced by the restriction of a population to a hospitalised cohort using an example from the recent Covid-19 pandemic.

Chris Stringer.

Interview with Chris Stringer, who studies human origins at the Natural History Museum of London.

Malnutrition and cachexia are associated with poor CAR T-cell therapy outcomes including survival.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a revolutionary treatment for patients with refractory or relapsed B-cell malignancies. However, a significant proportion of patients experience negative outcomes, including severe inflammatory toxicities and relapse. Cachexia and malnutrition are known secondary syndromes in many cancer patients, attributed to the effects of active malignancy, systemic inflammation, and cumulative treatment burden; however, further research is required to accurately characterise these issues in CAR T-cell patients. The aims of this service evaluation were to explore the changes in nutritional status (malnutrition and cachexia) in CAR T-cell therapy patients and the potential impact on patient outcomes including survival. Additionally, we describe the utilisation of dietetic resources in this specific patient population in a London tertiary referral centre. METHODS: Adult haematology patients receiving licensed CD19-targeting CAR T-cell therapy at University College London Hospital between 01/04/19 and 01/09/21 were included. Data were collected from the time of treatment consent, and throughout admission to day of discharge: body weight (BW), C-reactive protein, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, nutrition-risk screening scores (hospital-specific) and dietetic input. Clinical outcomes such as 12-month all-cause mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, high-grade toxicities, and length of hospital stay (LoS) were also recorded. Cachexia and malnutrition were defined using the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) consensus, respectively. RESULTS: 114 patients (55.6 ± 15.1 years; 57% males) with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 109) and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (n = 5), receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel (n = 89) and tisagenlecleucel (n = 25) were included. Median LoS for treatment was 34 (27-38) days. Prior to treatment, 31.5% of patients developed malnutrition, with pre-cachexia/refractory cachexia (mGPS) identified in 43.6% of patients. This altered nutritional status pre-treatment was significantly associated with adverse patient outcomes post-infusion; mGPS was independently associated with inferior overall survival (HR = 3.158, CI = 1.36-7.323, p = 0.007), with malnutrition and mGPS associated with increased LoS (p = 0.037), sepsis (p = 0.022) and ICU admission (p = 0.039). During admission, patients experienced significant BW loss (-5.6% (-8.8 to -2.4); p=<0.001), with 68.4% developing malnutrition. Malnutrition screening during admission identified 57% patients at-risk, with 66.6% of patients referred to dietetics; however, there was a lack of malnutrition screening and dietetic referrals prior to treatment. CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment malnutrition and cachexia was significantly associated with adverse CAR T patient outcomes, including mGPS cachexia status independently associated with inferior overall survival. Further research in this novel space is essential to confirm the extent and impact of nutritional issues, to assist with implementing dietetic pathways, and to identify potential interventions with a view to optimising outcomes.

Engagement of culturally diverse communities in primary care research.

BACKGROUND: The underrepresentation of ethnic minorities and low-income groups in primary care (PC) research hinders the development of effective treatments for diverse populations. AIM: To develop a framework that general practice staff and researchers can use to improve the participation of underserved groups in PC research. METHOD: This study was undertaken across 10 GP practices in South London serving 150 658 patients. Practices are distributed across ethnically diverse and highly deprived communities. A mixed-methods approach was utilised. Retrospective data were collected on patient participation in research studies across the practices between July 2022 and July 2023. Professional and patient focus groups, and a patient questionnaire, were undertaken to understand awareness and knowledge of, enablers for, and barriers to research participation. RESULTS: Over the 12-month period, 627 patients participated in PC research studies across the 10 practices. Black African and Black Caribbean patients accounted for 26% of the practices' patient population but were significantly underrepresented in research, comprising only 11% of participants. Patients of Asian backgrounds accounted for 11% of the practices' population but made up 20% of research participants. Lack of awareness of research participation opportunities, fear of side effects, language barriers, and mistrust of researchers were some of the barriers to participation. Participants highlighted that trust in their GP, education, and transparency of research processes were key to building long-term engagement. CONCLUSION: This study provides insights into poor recruitment of specific ethnic minorities into primary care studies. The authors identified adaptations to research engagement activities, which are required to ensure that participation is improved.

Exploratory study of frequent attenders in general practice to better understand why patients seek help.

BACKGROUND: Frequent attenders (defined as the top 10% of health care users or those making ≥10 visits per year) account for 30-50% of GP consultations. This has significant resource implications. AIM: To understand the characteristics of frequent attenders (≥18-years) at an outer London general practice (list 5,876; deprivation index 5th decile) and reasons for attending. METHOD: A retrospective case note review was conducted using SystmOne of people attending on ≥10 occasions to see a health professional between March 2022 and February 2023. Data were extracted by hand: age, gender, reason and type of consultation, diagnoses, referrals, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), mortality at one year. Patient notes for ≥30 contacts were reviewed by a senior GP. RESULTS: 544 people (9.3%) attended ≥10 appointments. Of these, five interacted with a GP ≥50 occasions (Group 1;mean age:74.6yrs/female: 4 /CCI:5.0), eight ≥40 occasions (Group 2; 69.6yrs/6.0/5.5) and 35 ≥30 occasions (Group 3;70yrs/27/4.7). Forty-eight people accounted for 882 appointments, 29% face to face and 71% by telephone. Frequency increased with age and CCI. Patients in group 3 underwent more investigations (6.0/6.0/10.0). There was no difference in mean numbers of clinicians seen (6.4/7.1/7.4) or referrals (5.0/4.0/5.0) between the three groups. Frequent attenders tended to fall into two groups: people with chronic diseases, typically associated with anxiety and complex needs, and people with ongoing mental health conditions. Coding was challenging due to complexity. CONCLUSION: Frequent attenders presented due to their medical complexity or mental health disorders rather than medically unexplained symptoms. Most interactions with a GP are understandable.

Can remote testing for chronic kidney disease improve outcomes without widening existing health inequalities? A collaborative quality improvement project in primary care.

BACKGROUND: In the UK, chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a prevalent, silent and strong predictor of cardiovascular disease. Identification of CKD is poor in primary care, particularly in minority ethnic and socio-economically deprived groups. AIM: To investigate feasibility of remote ACR testing to improve the detection and management of CKD in underserved groups. METHOD: 13 591 tests were sent out across South East London. Individuals with diabetes and no ACR in the past year were offered a remote ACR test to complete at home with a smartphone using a validated app (Healthy.io). We extracted data on demographics, medical comorbidities and medication. Analyses (Stata) describe who completed the test. RESULTS: Twenty-seven practices agreed to participate. Analyses of 6082 tests sent show the test completion rate was 46.8%. Adjusted odds ratios demonstrated that people were less likely to complete testing if over 70 years (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.89) and over 80 (OR 0.43, CI 95% 0.33 to 0.56) compared to <40 years old; people from CORE20 groups (most deprived quintile) were also less likely to complete testing (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.76) and those with missing data and those with no recorded healthcare interactions within the last 5 years were also less likely to complete testing. DISCUSSION: Remote ACR testing presents an opportunity to diagnose early CKD but there is still inequity in who completes testing. Engagement with stakeholders is needed to explore innovative ways to implement remote ACR testing to achieve equitable CKD screening.

Crisis Rescue Foundation Vaxi Taxi/health and wellbeing pop-ups project.

BACKGROUND: Established by Crisis Rescue Foundation in 2021 to support the missing and vulnerable to access health and wellbeing help. AIM: Address health and wellbeing needs of people experiencing barriers to accessing NHS and allied care by delivering pop-ups in the hearts of communities, outside GP surgery and hospital walls, in a warm, inclusive environment. METHOD: Forty pop-ups so far across London delivering bespoke, individualised health information and signposting, joining up NHS, allied and local community services at key sites, including asylum seeker/homeless/faith/refugee/drug and alcohol support/food bank/sex worker support/youth club and education centres. A 'Medical Glastonbury' with background music, plus free food, toiletry goodie bags and clothes. Drug and alcohol/heart/oral/foot/sexual and mental health; support for carers; BLS; violence reduction; youth mentoring; housing; vaccination; wellbeing and more, information and signposting offered to local people by professionals, supporting and empowering people to access trusted guidance and care. Cardio and mental health check cards to record health information and guide next steps in appropriate care. RESULTS: Around 2000 Londoners were given health and wellbeing information. 80% of service users were from ethnic minority backgrounds. Over 99% of service users rated pop-ups highly. Over 1/3 had raised BP and nearly 2/3 had raised BMI detected and the individuals were signposted to appropriate information and care. CONCLUSION: Effective, bespoke and personalised information, and signposting to support were well-received at the pop-ups. Professionals working with service users experiencing inequalities of allied and local voluntary organisations to enhance equity by addressing the unmet health and wellbeing needs of the missing and the vulnerable.

Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of text-message reminders and telephone patient navigation to improve the uptake of faecal immunochemical test screening among non-responders in London: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Participation in bowel cancer screening is lower in regions where there is high ethnic diversity and/or socioeconomic deprivation. Interventions, such as text message reminders and patient navigation (PN), have the potential to increase participation in these areas. As such, there is interest in the comparative effectiveness of these interventions to increase bowel cancer screening participation, as well as their relative cost-effectiveness. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will use a three-arm randomised controlled trial design to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of text message reminders and PN to increase the uptake of bowel cancer screening in London. Participants will be individuals who have not returned a completed faecal immunochemical test kit within 13 weeks of receiving a routine invitation from the London bowel cancer screening hub. Participants will be randomised (in a 1:1:1 ratio) to receive either (1) usual care (ie, 'no intervention'), (2) a text message reminder at 13 weeks, followed by repeated text message reminders at 15, 17 and 19 weeks (in the event of non-response) or (3) a text message reminder at 13 weeks, followed by PN telephone calls at 15, 17 and 19 weeks in the event of non-response. The primary endpoint will be participation in bowel cancer screening, defined as 'the return of a completed kit by week 24'. Statistical analysis will use multivariate logistic regression and will incorporate pairwise comparisons of all three groups, adjusted for multiple testing. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approvals to conduct the research have been obtained from University College London's Joint Research Office (Ref: 150666), the Screening Research, Innovation and Development Advisory Committee ('RIDAC', Ref: 2223 014 BCSP Kerrison), the Health Research Authority (Ref: 22/WM/0212) and the Confidentiality Advisory Group (Ref: 22/CAG/0140). Results will be conveyed to stakeholders, notably those managing the screening programme and published in peer-reviewed journals/presented at academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN17245519.

Living on low-incomes with multiple long-term health conditions: A new method to explore the complex interaction between finance and health.

People on low-incomes in the UK develop multiple long-term health conditions over 10 years earlier than affluent individuals. Financial diaries -new to public health- are used to explore the lived experiences of financially-vulnerable individuals, diagnosed with at least one long-term condition, living in two inner-city London Boroughs. Findings show that the health status of these individuals is a key barrier to work opportunities, undermining their income. Their precarious and uncertain financial situation, sometimes combined with housing issues, increased stress and anxiety which, in turn, contributed to further deteriorate participants' health. Long-term health conditions limited the strategies to overcome moments of financial crisis and diarists frequently used credit to cope. Restrictions to access reliable services and timely support were connected to the progression of multiple long-term conditions. Models that integrate healthcare, public health, welfare and financial support are needed to slow down the progression from one to many long-term health conditions.

An interview with Jean-Paul Vincent.

Jean-Paul (JP) Vincent is Group Leader at the Francis Crick Institute, London. His lab is interested in understanding how cells communicate to form organs during development. In 2024, he was awarded the British Society for Developmental Biology (BSDB) Waddington medal, which honours outstanding research performance and services to the developmental biology community. This interview was conducted at the 2024 BSDB and Genetics Society Joint Spring Meeting in Warwick, UK, where JP was presented with the medal.

Alexander Fleming: a second look.

In 1928, Alexander Fleming (1881-1955) identified penicillin, the world's first antibiotic. It was a chance discovery that could have easily been missed had Fleming not taken a second look at a contaminated Petri dish. The discovery of penicillin marked a profound turning point in history as it was the first time deadly infections such as bacterial pneumonia, sepsis, diphtheria, meningitis, and puerperal fever after childbirth could be cured, and it paved the way for the development of additional antibiotics. The Alexander Fleming Laboratory Museum, one of several London Museums of Health and Medicine, is a reconstruction of Fleming's laboratory in its original location at St. Mary's Hospital. As if stepping back in time, visitors gain a glimpse into the man, his bacteriology work, and the events surrounding this important finding. For those unable to travel to London, this article provides a brief narrative of the fascinating story.

Unpacking the perceived cycling safety of road environment using street view imagery and cycle accident data.

Cycling, as a routine mode of travel, offers significant benefits in promoting health, eliminating emissions, and alleviating traffic congestion. Many cities, including London, have introduced various policies and measures to promote 'active travel' in view of its manifold advantages. Nevertheless, the reality is not as desirable as expected. Existing studies suggest that cyclists' perceptions of cycling safety significantly hinder the broader adoption of cycling. Our study investigates the perceived cycling safety and unpacks the association between the cycling safety level and the road environment, taking London as a case study. First, we proposed novel cycling safety level indicators that incorporate both collision and injury risks, based on which a tri-tiered cycling safety level prediction spanning the entirety of London's road network has been generated with good accuracy. Second, we assessed the road environment by harnessing imagery features of street view reflecting the cyclist's perception of space and combined it with road features of cycle accident sites. Finally, associations between road environment features and cycling safety levels have been explained using SHAP values, leading to tailored policy recommendations. Our research has identified several key factors that contribute to a risky environment for cycling. Among these, the "second road effects," which refers to roads intersecting with the road where the accident occurred, is the most critical to cycling safety levels. This would also support and further contribute to the literature on road safety. Other results related to road greenery, speed limits, etc, are also discussed in detail. In summary, our study offers insights into urban design and transport planning, emphasising the perceived cycling safety of road environment.

Virtual reality as an engaging and enjoyable method for delivering emergency clinical simulation training: a prospective, interventional study of medical undergraduates.

BACKGROUND: It is a requirement that medical students are educated in emergencies and feel well prepared for practice as a doctor, yet national surveys show that many students feel underprepared. Virtual reality (VR), combined with 360-degree filming, provides an immersive, realistic, and interactive simulation experience. Unlike conventional in-person simulation, it is scalable with reduced workforce demands. We sought to compare students' engagement and enjoyment of VR simulation to desktop computer-based simulation. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, interventional, evaluation study. The study was carried out on final year medical students undertaking their Pre-Foundation Assistantship (n = 116) at Imperial College School of Medicine (ICSM) in London. We compared objective engagement, subjective engagement, and subjective enjoyment of VR simulation to desktop computer-based simulation using cardiac arrest and life-threatening asthma scenarios. Engagement was measured objectively using students' physiological parameters, including heart rate and eye tracking, and facilitator observations using the validated 'Behavioural Engagement Related to Instruction' (BERI) protocol. Students' subjective engagement and enjoyment levels were measured using a post-session survey. RESULTS: Students' maximum heart rates were significantly higher during VR simulation with a mean difference of 4.2 beats per minute (3.2 to 5.2, p < 0.001), and eye tracking showed they spent a significantly greater mean percentage of time of 6.4% (5.1 to 7.7, p < 0.001) focusing on the scenarios in VR compared to standard desktop. Qualitative data showed students enjoyed and felt engaged with the sessions, which provided a safe space for learning. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that students found VR simulations enjoyable and were more engaged compared to standard desktop simulation. This suggests that 360-degree VR simulation experiences provide students with immersive, realistic training, which is scalable, giving them the unique opportunity to manage emergencies and work within emergency teams, which would not typically occur during traditional training.

Change, Adversity, and Adaptation: Young People's Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic Expressed through Artwork and Semi-Structured Interviews.

This study explores how young people's mental health was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic using artwork and semi-structured interviews. The mental health impacts of the pandemic are important to understand so that policy and practice professionals can support those affected, prepare and respond to future crises, and support young people who are isolated and restricted in other contexts. Co-designed participatory art workshops and interviews were conducted with 16-18-year-olds (n = 21, 62% female) from the London-based Longitudinal cohort Study of Cognition, Adolescents and Mobile Phones (SCAMP). Artworks and interview transcripts were qualitatively co-and analysed with young people. From interviews, six themes were identified: adaptation, restriction, change, challenges, overcoming adversity, and lockdown life. From the artwork, four themes were identified: trapped, negative mental wellbeing, positive emotions, and technology. Everyday factors such as home environment, social support, hobbies, habits, and online education were key determinants of how challenged and restricted participants felt, and their capacity to overcome this. This demonstrates the importance of wider (social and environmental) determinants and supports a systems-level public health approach to young people's mental health. For example, young people's mental health services should collaborate with other sectors to address such determinants in a holistic way. Clearer guidance and support with occupation, relationships, environment, routine and activities could mitigate the negative mental health impacts of major environmental changes on young people.

Identifying barriers to outpatient appointment attendance in patient groups at risk of inequity: a mixed methods study in a London NHS trust.

BACKGROUND: There is significant health inequity in the United Kingdom (U.K.), with different populations facing challenges accessing health services, which can impact health outcomes. At one London National Health Service (NHS) Trust, data showed that patients from deprived areas and minority ethnic groups had a higher likelihood of missing their first outpatient appointment. This study's objectives were to understand barriers to specific patient populations attending first outpatient appointments, explore systemic factors and assess appointment awareness. METHODS: Five high-volume specialties identified as having inequitable access based on ethnicity and deprivation were selected as the study setting. Mixed methods were employed to understand barriers to outpatient attendance, including qualitative semi-structured interviews with patients and staff, observations of staff workflows and interrogation of quantitative data on appointment communication. To identify barriers, semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients who missed their appointment and were from a minority ethnic group or deprived area. Staff interviews and observations were carried out to further understand attendance barriers. Patient interview data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis to create a thematic framework and triangulated with staff data. Subthemes were mapped onto a behavioural science framework highlighting behaviours that could be targeted. Quantitative data from patient interviews were analysed to assess appointment awareness and communication. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients and 11 staff were interviewed, with four staff observed. Seven themes were identified as barriers - communication factors, communication methods, healthcare system, system errors, transport, appointment, and personal factors. Knowledge about appointments was an important identified behaviour, supported by eight out of 26 patients answering that they were unaware of their missed appointment. Environmental context and resources were other strongly represented behavioural factors, highlighting systemic barriers that prevent attendance. CONCLUSION: This study showed the barriers preventing patients from minority ethnic groups or living in deprived areas from attending their outpatient appointment. These barriers included communication factors, communication methods, healthcare the system, system errors, transport, appointment, and personal factors. Healthcare services should acknowledge this and work with public members from these communities to co-design solutions supporting attendance. Our work provides a basis for future intervention design, informed by behavioural science and community involvement.