Impact of systemic steroids on the efficacy of first line imatinib treatment of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

BACKGROUND: Effective management of adverse events is required to maintain sufficient imatinib dosing when treating patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Skin rash is a common adverse event of imatinib, which can be effectively controlled by systemic steroid treatment without imatinib dose modification or interruption. However, the impact of the use of systemic steroids on the efficacy of imatinib treatment remains unclear. METHODS: Between October 2014 and February 2022, 277 consecutive patients from a prospective registry of GIST patients were included as the study population. Patients who started systemic steroids due to grade ≥ 3 skin rash or grade 2 skin rash with grade 2 pruritis were classified as the steroid group, whereas patients who did not develop a skin rash or those who did not require steroids for a mild skin rash were classified as the control group. Efficacy outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among the 277 patients, 30 (10.8%) were treated with systemic steroids for skin rash. There was no significant difference in progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) between the steroid and control groups (3-year PFS, 67.7% vs. 65.1%, p = 0.53; 3-year OS, 91% vs. 89.9%, p = 0.67, respectively). The use of systemic steroids was not an independent factor associated with PFS (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.36-1.49, p = 0.39) and OS (hazard ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.12-1.18, p = 0.09). In the steroid group, patients who successfully maintained the imatinib dosage showed a trend toward more favorable survival outcomes than those who did not (3-year PFS, 73.3% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.34; 3-year OS, 95.8% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.15, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The use of systemic steroids for the control of imatinib induced severe skin rash did not adversely affect the efficacy outcomes of imatinib in patients with advanced GIST.

Safety, effectiveness and the optimal duration of preoperative imatinib in locally advanced gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of preoperative imatinib (IM) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, therapeutic effectiveness, and optimal duration of preoperative IM in patients with locally advanced gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). METHODS: The clinicopathologic data of 41 patients with locally advanced gastric GIST who received preoperative IM and underwent surgical resection from January 2014 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: After a median of 7.0 (IQR: 4.5-10) months of preoperative IM treatment, 30 patients experienced adverse events (AEs), 80% of which were grade 1/2 AEs. The mean tumor size decreased from 12.71 ± 5.34 cm to 8.26 ± 4.00 cm, with a reduction rate of 35%. Setting 8 months as the cut-off value according to the results of ROC analysis. The proportion of laparoscopic surgery was higher in patients with short-term (≤8 months) versus long-term (>8 months) preoperative IM. Compared with the subtotal/total gastrectomy group, patients in the local gastrectomy group exhibited less intraoperative blood loss, shorter length of postoperative hospital stay, and fewer postoperative complications. The 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 82.9% and 97.6%, and the expected 5-year RFS and OS rates were 75.6% and 90.2% respectively. RFS was better in the short-term than in the long-term preoperative IM treatment group, and it was also better in pre- plus postoperative IM treatment group than that in the preoperative IM alone group. Both univariate and multivariate COX analysis showed that a higher mitotic index and long-term preoperative IM treatment were associated with worse RFS, while postoperative IM treatment could significantly improve RFS. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that in patients with locally advanced gastric GIST, preoperative short-term (≤8 months) use of IM is associated with higher RFS than long-term use.

Imatinib­ and ponatinib­mediated cardiotoxicity in zebrafish embryos and H9c2 cardiomyoblasts.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) offer targeted therapy for cancers but can cause severe cardiotoxicities. Determining their dose­dependent impact on cardiac function is required to optimize therapy and minimize adverse effects. The dose­dependent cardiotoxic effects of two TKIs, imatinib and ponatinib, were assessed in vitro using H9c2 cardiomyoblasts and in vivo using zebrafish embryos. In vitro, H9c2 cardiomyocyte viability, apoptosis, size, and surface area were evaluated to assess the impact on cellular health. In vivo, zebrafish embryos were analyzed for heart rate, blood flow velocity, and morphological malformations to determine functional and structural changes. Additionally, reverse transcription­quantitative PCR (RT­qPCR) was employed to measure the gene expression of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), established markers of cardiac injury. This comprehensive approach, utilizing both in vitro and in vivo models alongside functional and molecular analyses, provides a robust assessment of the potential cardiotoxic effects. TKI exposure decreased viability and surface area in H9c2 cells in a dose­dependent manner. Similarly, zebrafish embryos exposed to TKIs exhibited dose­dependent heart malformation. Both TKIs upregulated ANP and BNP expression, indicating heart injury. The present study demonstrated dose­dependent cardiotoxic effects of imatinib and ponatinib in H9c2 cells and zebrafish models. These findings emphasize the importance of tailoring TKI dosage to minimize cardiac risks while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. Future research should explore the underlying mechanisms and potential mitigation strategies of TKI­induced cardiotoxicities.

Clinical efficacy and safety of first-line nilotinib or imatinib therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia-Nationwide real life data.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the outcomes of first-line imatinib versus nilotinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP) in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: A propensity score analysis was performed to eliminate imbalances between the treatment groups. In the analysis, 163 patients in the nilotinib group and 163 patients in the matched imatinib group were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Nilotinib-treated patients achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response more rapidly than imatinib-treated patients. However, there was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups (OS: 94.3% vs. 90.5%, p = 0.602; PFS: 92.9% vs. 88.0%, p = 0.614). Nilotinib-treated patients had a higher failure-free survival (FFS) and event-free survival (EFS) than imatinib-treated patients (FFS: 71.7% vs. 54.3%, p = 0.040; EFS: 71.7% vs. 53.5%, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis from clinical practice did not confirm any benefit of frontline nilotinib treatment for OS and PFS; however, it did demonstrate higher FFS and EFS in the nilotinib cohort.

Imatinib therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia significantly reduces carnitine cell intake, resulting in adverse events.

OBJECTIVE: A prominent, safe and efficient therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is inhibiting oncogenic protein BCR::ABL1 in a targeted manner with imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. A substantial part of patients treated with imatinib report skeletomuscular adverse events affecting their quality of life. OCTN2 membrane transporter is involved in imatinib transportation into the cells. At the same time, the crucial physiological role of OCTN2 is cellular uptake of carnitine which is an essential co-factor for the mitochondrial ß-oxidation pathway. This work investigates the impact of imatinib treatment on carnitine intake and energy metabolism of muscle cells. METHODS: HTB-153 (human rhabdomyosarcoma) cell line and KCL-22 (CML cell line) were used to study the impact of imatinib treatment on intracellular levels of carnitine and vice versa. The energy metabolism changes in cells treated by imatinib were quantified and compared to changes in cells exposed to highly specific OCTN2 inhibitor vinorelbine. Mouse models were used to test whether in vitro observations are also achieved in vivo in thigh muscle tissue. The analytes of interest were quantified using a Prominence HPLC system coupled with a tandem mass spectrometer. RESULTS: This work showed that through the carnitine-specific transporter OCTN2, imatinib and carnitine intake competed unequally and intracellular carnitine concentrations were significantly reduced. In contrast, carnitine preincubation did not influence imatinib cell intake or interfere with leukemia cell targeting. Blocking the intracellular supply of carnitine with imatinib significantly reduced the production of most Krebs cycle metabolites and ATP. However, subsequent carnitine supplementation rescued mitochondrial energy production. Due to specific inhibition of OCTN2 activity, the influx of carnitine was blocked and mitochondrial energy metabolism was impaired in muscle cells in vitro and in thigh muscle tissue in a mouse model. CONCLUSIONS: This preclinical experimental study revealed detrimental effect of imatinib on carnitine-mediated energy metabolism of muscle cells providing a possible molecular background of the frequently occurred side effects during imatinib therapy such as fatigue, muscle pain and cramps.

Untargeted metabolomics analysis reveals the potential mechanism of imatinib-induced skin rash in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Imatinib-induced skin rash poses a significant challenge for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor, often resulting in treatment interruption or discontinuation and subsequent treatment failure. However, the underlying mechanism of imatinib-induced skin rashes in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients remains unclear. A total of 51 patients (27 with rash and 24 without rash) were enrolled in our study. Blood samples were collected concomitantly with the onset of clinical manifestations of rashes, and simultaneously collecting clinical relevant information. The imatinib concentration and untargeted metabolomics were performed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. There were no significant differences in age, gender, imatinib concentration and white blood cells count between the rash group and the control group. However, the rash group exhibited a higher eosinophil count (P<0.05) and lower lymphocyte count (P<0.05) compared to the control group. Untargeted metabolomics analysis found that 105 metabolites were significantly differentially abundant. The univariate analysis highlighted erucamide, linoleoylcarnitine, and valine betaine as potential predictive markers (AUC≥0.80). Further enriched pathway analysis revealed primary metabolic pathways, including sphingolipid signaling pathway, sphingolipid metabolism, cysteine and methionine metabolism, biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, arginine and proline metabolism, and biosynthesis of amino acids. These findings suggest that the selected differential metabolites could serve as a foundation for the prediction and management of imatinib-induced skin rash in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients.

Clinicopathologic features of pityriasis rosea-like drug eruption secondary to imatinib: A case report and review of the literature.

Pityriasis rosea is an acute, self-limited exanthem that typically occurs in adolescence and young adulthood, classically featuring ovoid erythematous and scaly lesions on the trunk and proximal extremities. While its cause is not definitively known, the classic form of pityriasis rosea may result from the reactivation of latent human herpesvirus (HHV) infections (HHV-6 and HHV-7). Interestingly, drug eruptions that clinically and/or histopathologically resemble pityriasis rosea have also been reported. These pityriasis rosea-like drug eruptions tend to occur at an older age and have a shorter duration than the classic type. As there are different management paradigms, the distinction between classic pityriasis rosea and the mimicking drug eruption is important to recognize. Herein, we report a case of a pityriasis rosea-like drug eruption that occurred in association with imatinib mesylate treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. We also review the clinicopathologic features of reported cases of pityriasis rosea-like drug eruption, including those due to imatinib. While the clinical morphology of the cutaneous drug-related eruption mimics the lesions seen in classic pityriasis rosea, the presence of unique histopathologic findings, including necrotic keratinocytes, interface dermatitis, and eosinophils, may aid in distinction.

Two cases of imatinib induced oral pigmentation affecting the palate.

BACKGROUND: Medication-related oral pigmentation is a unique yet benign finding in the dental setting. As new antineoplastic agents emerge, it is likely that this documented manifestation will continue to grow. CASE DESCRIPTION: Here, we describe two case presentations of imatinib-related hyperpigmentation of the palate. Both patients had been on imatinib, an antineoplastic agent for 10-14 years and presented with asymptomatic diffuse blue-black discoloration of the hard palate. Both cases demonstrated biopsy-proven pigment changes localized to the superficial connective tissue with evidence of melanin and hemosiderin deposits. Of note, this is a benign finding that does not require intervention. CONCLUSION: These two cases illustrate intraoral findings associated with imatinib. Increased awareness of this side effect will enable clinicians to appropriately council patients regarding the benign nature of this process.

Chronic myeloid leukemia in an ulcerative colitis patient receiving azathioprine: A case report.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease usually treated by azathioprine. It is a well-established risk factor for colorectal cancers and extraintestinal malignancies. Nevertheless, the risk of myeloid leukemia in patients with UC is less known. We report a case of a 51-year-old patient, with a history of extensive ulcerative colitis, who was treated with azathioprine at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day. Seven years later, he presented an increased count of white blood cells at 25,400/µL and of platelets at 1,382,000/µL. Peripheral blood smear showed 1% blasts and 20% myelemia. The karyotype showed the Philadelphia chromosome and the RT-PCR revealed the BCR-ABL transcript. Thus, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) was confirmed and imatinib was prescribed. This case reported a rare and serious event in a UC patient and illustrates the importance of closely monitoring this population.

[IMATINIB INDUCED EDEMA].

INTRODUCTION: Imatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and is used for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) since 2002. We present a patient who suffered from fluid retention and periorbital edema secondary to this drug.

Treatment free remission (TFR) after second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (2G-TKIs) treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): from feasibility to safety.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) prevalence is currently increasing due to the great efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Discontinuation of treatment in the long-term, owing to avoid off-target side effects or treatment-free remission (TFR), has become an additional treatment goal in CML patients who achieved a deep molecular response (DMR). Second-generation TKIs (2 G-TKIs) have a significantly higher rate of DMR than imatinib. Hence, especially in young patients with a strategy of TFR, 2 G-TKIs are becoming the most frequently used TKIs and may increase TFR attempts in the future. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the main findings extrapolated from clinical trials and real-life evidence regarding 2 G-TKIs discontinuation were discussed, through broad research on Medline, Embase, and archives from EHA and ASH congresses. EXPERT OPINION: Overall, TFR rate after 2 G-TKIs is ranging from 40% to 60% for selected patients with sustained DMR and it can be considered a safe procedure, that have become, nowadays, a daily practice. However, many crucial aspects regarding treatment choices, timings, as well as predictive factors, patient communication, and optimal strategies need to be better clarified to improve successful TFR rate.

Imatinib-induced ulcerative colitis.

INTRODUCTION: Imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the first-line therapy for patients with KIT mutation in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dyspepsia and abdominal pain are common gastrointestinal adverse reactions of imatinib, but imatinib-induced ulcerative colitis (UC) is rarely reported. CASE REPORT: We presented a case of UC induced by imatinib in a 56-year-old male patient who experienced this adverse event after 5 years of imatinib 400 mg/d treatment following GIST resection. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: The patient's diarrhea and bloody stools showed significant improvement following the discontinuation of imatinib therapy and administration of antidiarrheal medications. Then, imatinib was restarted at a daily dosage of 400 mg. DISCUSSION: UC is a rare adverse event associated with imatinib. Physicians should consider the possibility of UC induced by imatinib when patients present with diarrhea and bloody stool after receiving imatinib treatment. This case offered objective evidence of UC induced by imatinib.

Asciminib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) need long-term therapy with high efficacy and safety. Asciminib, a BCR::ABL1 inhibitor specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket, may offer better efficacy and safety and fewer side effects than currently available frontline ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METHODS: In a phase 3 trial, patients with newly diagnosed CML were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either asciminib (80 mg once daily) or an investigator-selected TKI, with randomization stratified by European Treatment and Outcome Study long-term survival score category (low, intermediate, or high risk) and by TKI selected by investigators before randomization (including imatinib and second-generation TKIs). The primary end points were major molecular response (defined as BCR::ABL1 transcript levels ≤0.1% on the International Scale [IS]) at week 48, for comparisons between asciminib and investigator-selected TKIs and between asciminib and investigator-selected TKIs in the prerandomization-selected imatinib stratum. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were assigned to receive asciminib and 204 to receive investigator-selected TKIs. The median follow-up was 16.3 months in the asciminib group and 15.7 months in the investigator-selected TKI group. A major molecular response at week 48 occurred in 67.7% of patients in the asciminib group, as compared with 49.0% in the investigator-selected TKI group (difference, 18.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6 to 28.2; adjusted two-sided P<0.001]), and in 69.3% of patients in the asciminib group as compared with 40.2% in the imatinib group within the imatinib stratum (difference, 29.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 16.9 to 42.2; adjusted two-sided P<0.001). The percentage of patients with a major molecular response at week 48 was 66.0% with asciminib and 57.8% with TKIs in the second-generation TKI stratum (difference, 8.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.1 to 21.5). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher and events leading to discontinuation of the trial regimen were less frequent with asciminib (38.0% and 4.5%, respectively) than with imatinib (44.4% and 11.1%) and second-generation TKIs (54.9% and 9.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial comparing asciminib with investigator-selected TKIs and imatinib, asciminib showed superior efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML. Direct comparison between asciminib and second-generation TKIs was not a primary objective. (Funded by Novartis; ASC4FIRST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04971226).

Oral lesions associated with imatinib mesylate therapy: five new cases and a literature review.

This study aimed to report the collective clinical characteristics of oral side effects associated with imatinib therapy according to age, sex, and clinical condition. A bibliographic review was performed using the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. Forty-five cases of oral side effects due to imatinib therapy were identified in the literature. With the addition of five new cases seen at the authors' institution, a total of 50 cases were analysed. Of the five new cases, four with gastrointestinal stromal tumours developed oral lichenoid lesions (OLLs), and one with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) developed oral hyperpigmentation (OHP). Of the total 50 patients, 26 were male and 24 were female, and age ranged from 29 to 86 years. Most patients were ≥50 years old (80%); only three patients were jaw was the least common, with just five cases (10%). Among the patients with OHP, the predominant clinical condition was CML (22 cases, 91.7%). In conclusion, the possibility of oral side effects needs to be considered during the examination of patients receiving imatinib therapy.

Toxicities associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor maintenance following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers a potential cure in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); nonetheless, relapses are common and the major cause of mortality. One strategy to prevent relapse is tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) maintenance post-HCT, but published clinical experience is primarily with the first-generation TKI imatinib while data with newer generation TKIs are limited. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 185 Ph+ ALL patients who underwent HCT followed by TKI maintenance from 2003 to 2021 at City of Hope. Initially, 50 (27.0%) received imatinib, 118 (63.8%) received a second-generation TKI (2G-TKI), and 17 (9.2%) received ponatinib. A total of 77 patients (41.6%) required a dose reduction of their initial TKI due to toxicity. Sixty-six patients (35.7%) did not complete maintenance due to toxicity; 69 patients (37.3%) discontinued 1 TKI, and 11 (5.9%) discontinued 2 TKIs due to toxicity. Initial imatinib versus 2G-TKI versus ponatinib maintenance was discontinued in 19 (38.0%) versus 68 (57.6%) versus 3 (17.6%) patients due to toxicity (p = .003), respectively. Patients on ponatinib as their initial TKI had a longer duration of TKI maintenance versus 2G-TKI: 576.0 days (range, 72-921) versus 254.5 days (range, 3-2740; p = .02). The most common reasons for initial TKI discontinuation include gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance (15.1%), cytopenia (8.6%), and fluid retention (3.8%). The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival for the total population were 78% and 71%, respectively. Our findings demonstrate the challenges of delivering post-HCT TKI maintenance in a large real-world cohort as toxicities leading to TKI interruptions, discontinuation, and dose reduction were common.

Ponatinib vs Imatinib in Frontline Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: In newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), disease progression due to acquired resistance to first- or second-generation BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors is common. Ponatinib inhibits BCR::ABL1 and all single-mutation variants, including T315I. Objective: To compare frontline ponatinib vs imatinib in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. Design, Setting, and Participants: Global registrational, phase 3, open-label trial in adults aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. From January 2019 to May 2022, eligible patients at 77 sites were randomized 2:1 to ponatinib (30 mg/d) or imatinib (600 mg/d) with reduced-intensity chemotherapy, followed by single-agent ponatinib or imatinib after the cycle 20 phase of the trial. The last date of follow-up for this analysis was August 12, 2022. Intervention: Patients received ponatinib, 30 mg/d, or imatinib, 600 mg/d, with reduced-intensity chemotherapy, followed by single-agent ponatinib or imatinib after cycle 20. The ponatinib dose was reduced to 15 mg on achievement of minimal residual disease-(MRD) negative complete remission. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point of this interim analysis was MRD-negative complete remission (≤0.01% BCR::ABL1 [MR4] centrally assessed by reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction), with complete remission maintained for at least 4 weeks at the end of cycle 3. The key secondary end point was event-free survival. Results: Of 245 patients randomized (median age, 54 years; 133 [54.3%] female), 232 (ponatinib, n = 154; imatinib, n = 78) who had p190 or p210 dominant isoforms verified by the central laboratory were analyzed for the primary end point. The MRD-negative complete remission rate (primary end point) was significantly higher with ponatinib (34.4% [53/154]) vs imatinib (16.7% [13/78]) (risk difference, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.06-0.29]; P = .002). At the data cutoff, event-free survival had not met the prespecified number of events. Median event-free survival was not reached in the ponatinib group and was 29 months in the imatinib group. The most common adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Arterial occlusive events were infrequent and comparable between groups (ponatinib, 2.5%; imatinib, 1.2%). Conclusions and Relevance: Ponatinib demonstrated a superior rate of MRD-negative complete remission at the end of induction vs imatinib when combined with reduced-intensity chemotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. The safety profile of ponatinib was comparable with imatinib. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03589326.

[Side effects of dermato-oncologic therapies]. / Nebenwirkungen dermatoonkologischer Therapien.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as PD(L)1 and CTLA4 antibodies as well as targeted therapies such as BRAF and MEK inhibitors have significantly improved the systemic treatment of skin cancer in adjuvant and advanced therapy settings. All these drugs differ in their spectrum of side effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the spectrum of side effects of dermato-oncological therapies and their management, taking into account the current literature. RESULTS: The most important side effects of ICIs, the CCR4 inhibitor mogamulizumab, the ImmTAC tebentafusp, the BRAF and MEK inhibitors and the multityrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib are considered. CONCLUSIONS: Side effects can manifest themselves in all organ systems. Chronic side effects and long-term harm are possible, especially with ICIs, and require close therapy monitoring and patient education. Knowledge of the side effects and the temporal, sometimes delayed course of their occurrence are essential for diagnosis and prompt initiation of therapy.

Imatinib-induced dermatomyositis sine dermatitis - a rare case report.

Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies are rare conditions with several heterogeneous disease subtypes. They can range from limited muscle or skin involvement to severe, systemic, life-threatening disease. Although the etiology is unknown, some evidence suggests a role for external agents, particularly drugs. Herein, we present a case of a 71-year-old woman with chronic myeloid leukemia who developed imatinib-induced dermatomyositis sine dermatitis. The presentation was predominantly muscular, characterized by proximal muscle weakness and myalgia of the lower limbs, with positive anti-Mi2a antibodies. Spontaneous recovery was observed after drug discontinuation, without the need for immunosuppressive therapy. This is the first confirmed description of an imatinib-induced dermatomyositis sine dermatitis. It reflects the importance of a high awareness from rheumatologists and hematologists to accurately anticipate and identify similar situations.

A case-matched study of imatinib mesylate between different formulations on plasma trough concentration, adverse events, quality of life and outcomes in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients.

Genike, the imatinib (IM)-alpha form is widely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients in China. We wanted to investigate whether there are differences in IM plasma concentrations, adverse events, health-related quality of life (QOL) and outcomes between patients treated with Genike and Glivec. Thirty included GIST patients receiving IM treatment were matched to either Genike or Glivec according to gastrectomy, body weight, body surface area and sex. There was no statistically significant difference in IM trough plasma levels between the two groups. There were no significant differences in very common adverse events of IM between the Genike and Glivec groups. IM was well tolerated, although it was associated with a significant change in cognitive function (P < 0.001), fatigue (P = 0.015), pain (P = 0.015), nausea/vomiting (P = 0.029), insomnia (P = 0.019), diarrhea (P = 0.003) and financial difficulties (P < 0.001). Physical functioning, financial burden and insomnia were significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.026). Until Aug. 2022, there was no significant difference in time to imatinib treatment failure (TTF) between the two groups. In conclusion, there was no difference in IM plasma concentration and adverse events between Genike and Glivec. Both Genike and Glivec could partially decrease the QOL of GIST patients. Physical functioning was worse in Genike group than in Glivec group, while the economic burden and symptoms of insomnia in Glivec patients were worse. There was no significant difference in TTF between the two groups.