Paraplegic Patient with Metastatic Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Radioactive Iodine Therapy Safety and Efficacy Strategy.

High-activity radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy for metastatic thyroid cancer (TC) requires isolation to minimize radiation exposure to third parties, thus posing challenges for patients needing hands-on care. There are limited data on the approach to high-activity RAI treatment in paraplegic patients. We report a state-of-the-art multidisciplinary approach to the management of bedbound patients, covering necessary radiation safety measures that lead to radiation exposure levels as low as reasonably achievable. Given the limited literature resources on standardized approaches, we provide a practical example of the safe and successful treatment of a woman with BRAFV600E-mutant tall-cell-variant papillary TC and pulmonary metastases, who underwent dabrafenib redifferentiation before RAI therapy. The patient was 69 y old and had become paraplegic because of a motor-vehicle accident. Since caring for a paraplegic patient with neurogenic bowel and bladder dysfunction poses radiation safety challenges, a multidisciplinary team comprising endocrinologists, nuclear medicine physicians, radiation safety specialists, and the nursing department developed a radiation mitigation strategy to ensure patient and staff safety during RAI therapy. The proposed standardized approach includes thorough monitoring of radiation levels in the workplace, providing additional protective equipment for workers who handle radioactive materials or are in direct patient contact, and implementing strict guidelines for safely disposing of radioactive waste such as urine collected in lead-lined containers. This approach requires enhanced training, role preparation, and practice; use of physical therapy equipment to increase the exposure distance; and estimation of the safe exposure time for caregivers based on dosimetry. The effective and safe treatment of metastatic TC in paraplegic patients can be successfully implemented with a comprehensive radiation mitigation strategy and thorough surveying of personnel for contamination.

A new approach to combined proton-photon therapy for metastatic cancer patients.

Objective.Proton therapy is a limited resource and is typically not available to metastatic cancer patients. Combined proton-photon therapy (CPPT), where most fractions are delivered with photons and only few with protons, represents an approach to distribute proton resources over a larger patient population. In this study, we consider stereotactic radiotherapy of multiple brain or liver metastases, and develop an approach to optimally take advantage of a single proton fraction by optimizing the proton and photon dose contributions to each individual metastasis.Approach.CPPT treatments must balance two competing goals: (1) deliver a larger dose in the proton fractions to reduce integral dose, and (2) fractionate the dose in the normal tissue between metastases, which requires using the photon fractions. Such CPPT treatments are generated by simultaneously optimizing intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans based on their cumulative biologically effective dose (BEDα/ß). The dose contributions of the proton and photon fractions to each individual metastasis are handled as additional optimization variables in the optimization problem. The method is demonstrated for two patients with 29 and 30 brain metastases, and two patients with 4 and 3 liver metastases.Main results.Optimized CPPT plans increase the proton dose contribution to most of the metastases, while using photons to fractionate the dose around metastases which are large or located close to critical structures. On average, the optimized CPPT plans reduce the mean brain BED2by 29% and the mean liver BED4by 42% compared to IMRT-only plans. Thereby, the CPPT plans approach the dosimetric quality of IMPT-only plans, for which the mean brain BED2and mean liver BED4are reduced by 28% and 58%, respectively, compared to IMRT-only plans.Significance.CPPT with optimized proton and photon dose contributions to individual metastases may benefit selected metastatic cancer patients without tying up major proton resources.

Pain response in single-fraction 8-Gy radiotherapy for painful non-bone-metastasis tumors: a single-center retrospective study.

The effectiveness of single-fraction 8-Gy radiotherapy for painful bone metastases has been verified in numerous randomized controlled trials. However, few reports have described the effectiveness of single-fraction 8-Gy radiotherapy in painful tumors other than bone metastases. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the pain response to single-fraction 8-Gy radiotherapy in painful non-bone-metastasis tumors. We included patients who had received single-fraction 8-Gy radiotherapy for such tumors between January 2017 and December 2022, excluding those with brain metastases, hematological tumors and those who received re-irradiation. Pain response assessment was based on the best responses documented in the medical records and conducted by two radiation oncologists. A total of 36 eligible patients were included in this study. The irradiation sites included primary lesions in eight patients, lymph node metastases in eight, muscle metastases in seven, pleural dissemination in four, skin/subcutaneous metastases in four and other sites in five. Pain response was assessed in 24 patients after radiotherapy. Pain response rate was 88% in evaluable patients; 21 of the 24 patients experienced response. The median assessment date for pain response was 37 days (range: 8-156 days) after radiotherapy. Re-irradiation was performed in four patients (11%). Single-fraction 8-Gy radiotherapy seemed to be a promising treatment option for painful non-bone-metastasis tumors and warrants further investigation.

Second Chance for Cure: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic Disease.

PURPOSE: Local ablative therapy, such as radiotherapy or surgery, plays a key role in treatment of patients with oligometastatic disease. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) comes to the fore as a safe and effective treatment for patients with a limited number of metastases, even those located in hard-to-reach body sites. Many researchers have suggested that metastatsis-directed therapy could improve long-term progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with oligometastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-arm, observational study conducted between July 2015 and February 2022. In our institute, 60 patients with controlled primary tumors and one to five metastases were treated with SABR. Prescribed radiation doses ranged from 12 to 60 Gy administered in one to seven fractions. We aimed to determine whether metastatic-directed therapy using SABR for all oligometastases affects OS and PFS and whether the primary tumor or metastatic site influences OS/PFS. RESULTS: The most common primary malignancy types were prostate (n = 14), colorectal (n = 10), lung (n = 7), and breast cancers (n = 6). The median follow-up was 30 months, ranging from 9 to 79. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS and OS rates were 54.9%, 37.0%, and 37.0% and 98.3%, 84.4%, and 73.8%, respectively, and the median time to first progression was 15 (range, 2-32) months. Twenty-four (40%) patients had no recurrence. In our analysis, primary tumor site was not an independent prognostic factor. The metastatic site may influence on patient outcome in cases of localized bone and liver metastases. CONCLUSION: In our retrospective analysis, SABR was associated with favorable levels of PFS and OS in patients with oligometastases. The limitations of our study were lacking high-level evidence, and randomized studies to compare SABR and palliative standard of care are mandatory.

Long-term efficacy analysis of radiotherapy and local management of metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oligometastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A prospective, single-arm, single-center clinical study.

PURPOSE: We conducted a single-center, single-arm study (NCT03129412) to prospectively analyze the long-term outcomes of newly diagnosed patients with oligometastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who received radical radiotherapy and local treatment of metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who reached disease controll after platinum-based palliative chemotherapy continued to receive radical radiotherapy for the nasopharyngeal region and neck. Appropriate local treatments were selected to treat the metastatic lesions. The primary endpoint of this study was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were included in the final analysis. During a median follow-up of 60 months, the median OS and PFS were 53.87 and 24.23 months, respectively. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year PFS and OS rates were 76.5 %, 38.1 %, and 31.8 % and 98 %, 75.4 %, 45.6 %, respectively. Both single and multivariate analysis indicated that maintenance therapy after radiotherapy could significantly increase PFS (36.43 vs. 16.1 months, P = 0.005). The OS of patients with single organ metastasis was significantly better than that of patients with double organ metastasis (P = 0.001). In addition, the number of metastatic organs also significantly affected PFS in the multifactor analysis. CONCLUSION: Patients with newly diagnosed oligometastatic NPC can achieve long-term survival after receiving radical radiotherapy to the primary site and local treatment for metastases.

Percutaneous interstitial brachytherapy ablation for targeting oligometastatic gynecologic cancers.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of recurrent oligometastatic gynecologic malignancy may involve targeted surgery, thermal ablation, or CT-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy ablation (CT-HDR-IBTA). The purpose of this study was to describe the safety and efficacy of CT-HDR-IBTA for oligometastatic gynecologic malignancies. METHODS: With institutional review board approval (IRB) approval and compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) compliance, we searched our database to assemble a single-arm study cohort of all patients with oligometastatic gynecologic cancers who underwent CT-HDR-IBTA from 2012-2022 with follow-up. The electronic record was reviewed to determine relevant clinicopathological variables including patient demographics, prior treatments, clinical course, local control, and local and distant recurrence with follow-up imaging. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 37 lesions in 34 patients treated with CT-HDR-IBTA for recurrent oligometastatic uterine (n = 17), cervix (n = 1), or ovarian cancer (n = 16) with an average lesion size of 2.5 cm with an average patient age of 61.4 years. Each lesion was treated with an average radiation dose of 23.8 Gy in 1.8 fractions and a median follow-up time of 24.0 months. The primary efficacy of CT HDR ITBA was 73% with a median progression-free survival of 8.0 months (95% CI 3.6-12.8 months) and with 58% of patients still alive at 43 months with median overall survival not reached. The rate of Grade 1 adverse events was 22% without any Grade 2, 3 or 4 events. CONCLUSIONS: CT HDR IBTA was safe and effective for treating oligometastatic gynecologic cancers in a heavily pretreated cohort.

Assessment of treatment outcomes: cytoreductive surgery compared to radiotherapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer - an in-depth quantitative evaluation and retrospective cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: The management of oligometastatic prostate cancer, defined by its few metastatic sites, poses distinct clinical dilemmas. Debates persist regarding the most effective treatment approach, with both cytoreductive surgery and radiotherapy being key contenders. The purpose of this research is to thoroughly evaluate and compare the effectiveness of these two treatments in managing patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was carried out to find pertinent publications that compared the results of radiation and cytoreductive surgery for oligometastatic prostate cancer. A meta-analysis was conducted in order to evaluate both short-term and long-term survival. Furthermore, utilizing institutional patient data, a retrospective cohort research was conducted to offer practical insights into the relative performances of the two treatment regimens. RESULTS: Five relevant studies' worth of data were included for this meta-analysis, which included 1425 patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer. The outcomes showed that, in comparison to radiation, cytoreductive surgery was linked to a substantially better cancer-specific survival (CSS) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.70, 95% (CI): 0.59-0.81, P <0.001] and overall survival (OS) [HR, 0.80; 95% (CI), 0.77-0.82; P <0.01]. The two therapy groups' Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer-Free Survival (CRPCFS), however, did not differ significantly (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.17-1.06; HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.26-1.02, respectively). Out of the 102 patients who were recruited in the retrospective cohort research, 36 had cytoreductive surgery (CRP), 36 had radiation therapy (primary lesion), and 30 had radiation therapy (metastatic lesion). The follow-up time was 46.3 months (18.6-60.0) on average. The enhanced OS in the CRP group [OS interquartile range (IQR): 45-60 months] in comparison to the radiation group (OS IQR: 39.0-59.0 months and 25.8-55.0 months, respectively) was further supported by the cohort research. Furthermore, CRP had a better OS than both radiation (primary region) and radiotherapy (metastatic region), with the latter two therapeutic methods having similar OS. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis and retrospective research provide valuable insights into the comparative efficacy of cytoreductive surgery and radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer. While short-term survival (PFS, CRPCFS) was similar between the two groups, cytoreductive surgery exhibited superior CSS and OS. Adverse event rates were manageable in both modalities. These findings contribute to informed treatment decision-making for clinicians managing oligometastatic prostate cancer patients. Further prospective studies and randomized controlled trials are essential to corroborate these results and guide personalized therapeutic approaches for this distinct subset of patients.

Comprehensive analysis of Japanese nationwide cohort data of particle beam therapy for pulmonary, liver and lymph node oligometastases: particle beam therapy versus high-precision X-ray radiotherapy.

Japanese national oncological experts convened to evaluate the efficacy and safety of particle beam therapy (PT) for pulmonary, liver and lymph node oligometastases (P-OM, L-OM and LN-OM, respectively) and to conduct a statistically comparative analysis of the local control (LC) rate and overall survival (OS) rate of PT versus those of X-ray stereotactic body radiotherapy (X-SBRT) and X-ray intensity-modulated radiotherapy (X-IMRT). They conducted [1] an analysis of the efficacy and safety of metastasis-directed therapy with PT for P-OM, L-OM and LN-OM using a Japanese nationwide multi-institutional cohort study data set; [2] a systematic review of X-ray high-precision radiotherapy (i.e. X-SBRT/X-IMRT) and PT for P-OM, L-OM and LN-OM; and [3] a statistical comparison between LC and OS of the cohort data set in PT and that of the extracted historical data set in X-SBRT/X-IMRT from the preceding systematic review. Safety was evaluated as the incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events, while statistical comparisons of LC and OS were conducted by estimating the incidence rate ratios (IRR) for local progression and mortality, respectively. This study demonstrated that PT provided durable LC (3-year LC rate: 72.8-83.2%) with acceptable OS (3-year OS rate: 38.5-68.1%) and risk of severe toxicity incidence of 0.8-3.5% in radical metastasis-directed therapy for P-OM, L-OM and LN-OM. Compared to LC with X-SBRT or X-IMRT, LC with PT was potentially superior for P-OM; superior for L-OM; and equivalent for LN-OM. In particular, this study demonstrated that PT may be a new treatment option for L-OM tumors measuring > 5 cm.

Recent trends of characteristics and treatments in adults with newly diagnosed brain metastases.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate recent trends in characteristics and treatments among patients with brain metastases in clinical practice. METHODS: All newly diagnosed patients with brain metastases during 2016-2021 at a single cancer center were enrolled. We collected the detailed features of each patient and estimated the number of candidates considered to meet the following criteria used in common clinical trials: Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70 and mutated non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer or melanoma. The brain metastases treatments were classified as follows: (i) stereotactic radiosurgery, (ii) stereotactic radiosurgery and systemic therapy, (iii) whole-brain radiotherapy, (iv) whole-brain radiotherapy and systemic therapy, (v) surgery, (vi) immune checkpoint inhibitor or targeted therapy, (vii) cytotoxic agents and (ix) palliative care. Overall survival and intracranial progression-free survival were estimated from brain metastases diagnosis to death or intracranial progression. RESULTS: A total of 800 brain metastases patients were analyzed; 597 (74.6%) underwent radiotherapy, and 422 (52.7%) underwent systemic therapy. In addition, 250 (31.3%) patients were considered candidates for common clinical trials. Compared to 2016, the later years tended to shift from whole-brain radiotherapy to stereotactic radiosurgery (whole-brain radiotherapy: 35.7-29.1% and stereotactic radiosurgery: 33.4-42.8%) and from cytotoxic agents to immune checkpoint inhibitor/targeted therapy (cytotoxic agents: 10.1-5.0 and immune checkpoint inhibitor/targeted therapy: 7.8-10.9%). There was also an increase in the proportion of systemic therapy combined with radiation therapy (from 26.4 to 36.5%). The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 12.7 and 5.3 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the diversity of brain metastases patient characteristics, recent changes in treatment selection and the percentage of candidates in clinical trials.

Integrating radium-223 therapy into the management of metastatic prostate cancer care: a plain language summary.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: Few life-prolonging treatment options are available for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This article provides an overview of the current systemic treatments available for mCRPC and reviews studies that investigate the optimal timing for the use of radium-223. The aim is to illustrate possible systemic treatment sequences to maximize benefit from radium-223 therapy. WHAT IS METASTATIC CASTRATION-RESISTANT PROSTATE CANCER & HOW IS IT TREATED?: Prostate cancer is called mCRPC when it spreads to organs outside of the prostate (such as the lymph nodes, bones, liver, or lungs) and no longer responds to hormonal therapy. There are several treatment options available for mCRPC, such as abiraterone, enzalutamide, radium-223, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, olaparib, rucaparib, sipuleucel-T, and 177Lu-PSMA. It is important to understand the risks and benefits associated with each treatment and whether current use may have an impact on future treatment options, including eligibility in certain clinical trials. Maintaining bone health is also an important part of prostate cancer care. WHAT IS RADIUM-223?: Radium-223 is a radioactive molecule that releases strong radiation within a very small range around itself. It mainly travels to the bone where the prostate cancer has spread and kills the cancer cells in that area. Results from a clinical study named ALSYMPCA showed that men who received radium-223 lived longer in addition to having less bone pain. The most common side effects of radium-223 are nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Radium-223 minimally suppresses the bone marrow, which means that it slightly reduces the levels of red and white blood cells.

Interobserver variation in clinical target volume (CTV) delineation for stereotactic radiotherapy to non-spinal bone metastases in prostate cancer: CT, MRI and PET/CT fusion.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The use of SBRT for the treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer is increasing rapidly. While consensus guidelines are available for non-spinal bone metastases practice continues to vary widely. The aim of this study is to look at inter-observer variability in the contouring of prostate cancer non-spinal bone metastases with different imaging modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 15 metastases from 13 patients treated at our centre were selected. 4 observers independently contoured clinical target volumes (CTV) on planning CT alone, planning CT with MRI fusion, planning CT with PET-CT fusion and planning CT with both MRI and PET-CT fusion combined. The mean inter-observer agreement on each modality was compared by measuring the delineated volume, generalized conformity index (CIgen), and the distance of the centre of mass (dCOM), calculated per metastasis and imaging modality. RESULTS: Mean CTV volume delineated on planning CT with MRI and PET-CT fusion combined was significantly larger compared to other imaging modalities (p = 0.0001). CIgen showed marked variation between modalities with the highest agreement between planning CT + PET-CT (mean CIgen 0.55, range 0.32-0.73) and planning CT + MRI + PET-CT (mean CIgen 0.59, range 0.34-0.73). dCOM showed small variations between imaging modalities but a significantly shorter distance found on planning CT + PET-CT when compared with planning CT + PET-CT + MRI combined (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Highest consistency in CTV delineation between observers was seen with planning CT + PET-CT and planning CT + PET-CT + MRI combined.

Radiation Therapy in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer.

Prostate cancer ranges from localized, low risk to metastatic, morbid disease. Although radiation therapy (RT) is commonly incorporated in the treatment of early disease or for palliation of symptomatic lesions, its role in extending survival in metastatic disease is less well-established. Here, we review the available evidence surrounding localized RT in the presence of oligometastatic disease and metastasis-directed therapy in both hormone-sensitive and hormone-resistant prostate cancer. We further outline potential future incorporation of RT as an immune-sensitizing therapy and the importance of highly sensitive imaging modalities in considering RT in metastatic disease.

A Critical Review of the Role of Local Therapy for Oligometastatic Gastrointestinal Cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this critical review is to provide an overview of the role and outcomes associated with the use of local therapy for patients with oligometastatic gastrointestinal cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A review of clinical data was performed to describe outcomes associated with the use of systemic therapy and/or locoregional therapies for patients with oligometastatic gastrointestinal cancers including esophagus, gastric, liver, biliary, pancreas, colorectal, and anal canal. RESULTS: This review describes outcomes associated with current first line systemic therapy and oligometastasis directed locoregional therapy for patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Available data suggest that for well-selected patients among each gastrointestinal disease subsite, the use of local therapy is associated with favorable disease control and possible survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: These data emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration and consideration of radiation therapy for patients with oligometastatic gastrointestinal cancers to improve locoregional control and progression-free survival. Multiple trials are ongoing to determine whether metastasis-directed radiation therapy improves overall survival.

Distant Metastasis Velocity as a Novel Prognostic Score for Overall Survival After Disease Progression Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Disease.

PURPOSE: In patients with extracranial oligometastatic disease, distant failure (DF) after local ablative therapies is common. Prognostic scores to guide salvage treatment decision making are currently lacking. Analogous to brain metastasis velocity, we propose distant metastasis velocity (DMV) as a prognostic score for overall survival (OS) and widespread failure-free survival (WFFS) after DF following metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with ≤5 metastases from solid organ malignancies treated with SBRT to all lesions at our institution from 2014 to 2019 were screened, and patients who developed DF were included in this retrospective analysis. DMV was defined as metastases per month, determined at DF, and transformed into a 3-level categorical variable with cut points that minimized the log-rank P value for OS. Simple and multiple linear regression was used to predict DMV based on different patient and treatment variables. The association of DMV and other variables with OS was studied by univariable and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-five patients were screened, of which 303 developed DF and were included. The median DMV was 0.7 metastases per month. Patients with <0.5, 0.5 to 1.5, and >1.5 metastases per month were classified as low, intermediate, and high DMV, and had a median OS of 37.1, 26.7, and 16.8 months, respectively (P < .0001). On multivariable analysis, DMV was a strong independent predictor of OS, with a hazard ratio of 0.31 for low (P < .001) compared with high DMV. Lower DMV was significantly associated with longer WFFS (P = .04). The cumulative metastases volume at baseline (regression coefficient ß = 0.03, P = .04) and oligoprogressive/-persistent disease (ß = 1.91, P = .10) predicted higher DMV. CONCLUSIONS: DMV is a novel metric strongly associated with OS and WFFS after DF following SBRT in patients with oligometastatic disease and should be evaluated for decision making about the optimal multimodality salvage treatment strategy. The prognostic value of DMV should be validated in prospective studies.

Survival rates with external beam radiation therapy in newly diagnosed elderly metastatic prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The survival benefit of primary external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has never been formally tested in elderly men who were newly diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). We hypothesized that elderly patients may not benefit of EBRT to the extent as younger newly diagnosed mPCa patients, due to shorter life expectancy. METHODS: We relied on Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (2004-2016) to identify elderly newly diagnosed mPCa patients, aged >75 years. Kaplan-Meier, univariable and multivariable Cox regression models, as well as Competing Risks Regression models tested the effect of EBRT versus no EBRT on overall mortality (OM) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). RESULTS: Of 6556 patients, 1105 received EBRT (16.9%). M1b stage was predominant in both EBRT (n = 823; 74.5%) and no EBRT (n = 3908; 71.7%, p = 0.06) groups, followed by M1c (n = 211; 19.1% vs. n = 1042; 19.1%, p = 1) and M1a (n = 29; 2.6% vs. n = 268; 4.9%, p < 0.01). Median overall survival (OS) was 23 months for EBRT and 23 months for no EBRT (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97, p = 0.6). Similarly, median cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 29 months for EBRT versus 30 months for no EBRT (HR: 1.04, p = 0.4). After additional multivariable adjustment, EBRT was not associated with lower OM or lower CSM in the entire cohort, as well as after stratification for M1b and M1c substages. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly men who were newly diagnosed with mPCa, EBRT does not affect OS or CSS. In consequence, our findings question the added value of local EBRT in elderly newly diagnosed mPCa patients.

Dosimetry of 177Lu-DOTATOC first circle treatment in patients with advanced metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: A pilot study in China.

First cycle dosimetry calculation of 177Lu-DOTATOC (single activity:1.59-3.49 GBq) was carried out in eight patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) who underwent whole-body planar (0.5, 24, 48, 72 h) and SPECT/CT scans (24 h). Focal uptake of 177Lu-DOTATOC was found in primary and metastatic tumors. Organs with the highest absorbed doses per injected activity were tumors (1.293 ± 0.862 mGy/MBq) and spleen (0.461 ± 0.408 mGy/MBq), while low absorbed doses were observed in kidneys (0.384 ± 0.112 mGy/MBq) and bone marrow (0.0297 ± 0.0123 mGy/MBq). 177Lu-DOTATOC is safe, well-tolerated and appropriate in Chinese NETs patients for PRRT.

[Stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-spine bone oligometastatic disease]. / Radiothérapie stéréotaxique des métastases osseuses du squelette périphérique.

PURPOSE: Stereotaxic radiotherapy is performed regularly for the irradiation of non-spine bone metastases, but its place is not well understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article in stereotaxic radiotherapy of non-spine bones oligometastases presents the current scientific data relating to the indications, to virtual simulation, to the delineation of target volumes, to the total dose and fractionation, to the efficacy and tolerance. RESULTS: Oligometastatic patients are classified into 4 categories: oligorecurrences, oligometastasis, oligopersistence, oligoprogression. The prognosis will be evaluated according to the following characteristics: primary tumor, quantitative characteristics, kinetics, qualitative characteristics. The delineation of GTV includes extensions to the soft tissue and bone marrow with the aid of MRI and PET. The CTV corresponds to a margin of 2 to 5mm and the PTV to a margin of 2mm. The most widely used irradiation schemes are: 1 single fraction of 18 to 24Gy/1 fr; 24Gy/2 fr; 27 to 30Gy/3 fr; 30 to 35Gy/5 fr. Stereotaxis provides 90% local control at 1 year and good pain control. The side effects are not very marked. CONCLUSION: Stereotaxic radiotherapy is feasible, non-invasive, minimally toxic and effective with good local control and good pain relief. The main issue remains selecting the patients most likely to benefit from it.

18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography (NaF-18-PET/CT) radiomic signatures to evaluate responses to alpha-particle Radium-223 dichloride therapy in osteosarcoma metastases.

Patients with osteoblastic metastases from high risk osteosarcoma continue to have a poor prognosis after progression from standard-of-care multi-agent chemotherapy. In a first-in-human dose escalation trial of bone targeted Radium 223 dichloride alpha-particle therapy in 18 patients with advanced osteosarcoma only 1 patient responded based on conventional Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Na18F PET response Criteria in Solid Tumors(NAFCIST), based on Sodium fluoride-18 (Na18F) positron emission tomography (PET)-CT was developed to better evaluate bone specific response. To further appreciate the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of the partial or mixed responses, a radiomics method was developed. Analyses were performed with 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography imaging studies before and after alpha-particle therapy. Radioactive 18F- -atom concentrations were measured in soft-tissues, in approximately 1000 concentration data points for 18F- per 1 cm3 metastatic tumor. Data was analyzed from the SUV intensity values, the histogram of intensities and entropy values. Radiomics may inform intra-tumoral and inter-tumoral heterogeneity in response of bone forming osteosarcoma to alpha particle therapy. Each patient (and each tumor) represents an "N of 1" case and warrants in depth analysis individually.

[Stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine bone oligometastatic disease]. / Radiothérapie stéréotaxiques des métastases osseuses des lésions vertébrales.

Stereotactic radiotherapy is an ever more common technique, regardless of the location treated. However, spinal stereotactic radiotherapy requires a particular technicality in order to ensure its proper realization. There is now a large literature defining the type of imaging to be used, the dose to be delivered and the delineation of target volumes. This technique can achieve a significant local control and an interesting analgesic efficiency. However, its place in relation to conventional radiotherapy remains limited because it requires MRI imaging and a significantly longer patient management during the treatment fraction. In this context, it is currently mainly restricted to oligometastatic patients or for re-irradiations.

A priori quality assurance using a benchmark case of the randomized phase 2 GORTEC 2014-14 in oligometastatic head and neck cancer patients.

PURPOSE: A Benchmark Case (BC) was performed as part of the quality assurance process of the randomized phase 2 GORTEC 2014-14 OMET study, testing the possibility of multisite stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) alone in oligometastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) as an alternative to systemic treatment and SBRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Compliance of the investigating centers with the prescription, delineation, planning and evaluation recommendations available in the research protocol was assessed. In addition, classical dosimetric analysis was supplemented by quantitative geometric analysis using conformation indices. RESULTS: Twenty centers participated in the BC analysis. Among them, four major deviations (MaD) were reported in two centers. Two (10%) centers in MaD had omitted the satellite tumor nodule and secondarily validated after revision. Their respective DICE indexes were 0.37 and 0 and use of extracranial SBRT devices suboptimal There were significant residual heterogeneities between participating centers, including those with a similar SBRT equipment, with impact of plan quality using standard indicators and geometric indices. CONCLUSION: A priori QA using a BC conditioning the participation of the clinical investigation centers showed deviations from good SBRT practice and led to the exclusion of one out of the twenty participating centers. The majority of centers have demonstrated rigorous compliance with the research protocol. The use of quality indexes adds a complementary approach to improve assessment of plan quality.