Comparison of third-generation minimally invasive surgery, split-drill osteotomy, and triplanar chevron osteotomy for treating mild to moderate hallux valgus with metatarsalgia in middle-aged women: An observational study.

This retrospective study compared the clinical efficacy of third-generation minimally invasive surgery (3rd-MIS) split-drill osteotomy with soft tissue release to that of triplanar chevron osteotomy (TCO) for treating mild to moderate hallux valgus (HV) with metatarsalgia in middle-aged women. This study compared the efficacy of 3rd-MIS using split-drill osteotomy to that of TCO in treating mild to moderate HV with metatarsalgia in 52 middle-aged women from March 2022 to June 2023. Retrospectively analyzing a total of 52 patients (26 patients per group), we employed 2 distinct surgical methods across 2 groups in this study: the TCO group received a traditional TCO accompanied by soft tissue release, whereas the MIS group underwent a split-drill osteotomy with soft tissue release. The study compared the operation time, onset of weight-bearing, osteotomy healing, blood loss, pre- and postsurgery X-ray measurements, metatarsalgia, and foot function scores. In the TCO group, complications included peri-incisional numbness, elevation of the first metatarsal head with metatarsalgia, and bone hyperplasia with stiffness at the MTPJ in one patient each. In the MIS group, bunions were successfully corrected without significant complications like bone nonunion or avascular necrosis of the metatarsal head, and the metatarsal length was preserved. Significant differences in operation time, weight-bearing onset, healing, and blood loss were detected between groups (P < .05). Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in hallux valgus angle, 1-2 intermetatarsal angle, or distal metatarsal articular angle among the groups (P > .05). Nonetheless, notable postoperative differences were observed (P < .05). Foot function and pain scores, assessed by the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society and the Visual Analogue Scale, showed significant improvements in both groups following surgery. Both surgical techniques effectively corrected the HV angle without significant changes in the first metatarsal length. The MIS group experienced significantly less pain on the second day postsurgery, as indicated by lower Visual Analogue Scale scores (P < .05). Both techniques were similarly effective in treating metatarsalgia. 3rd-MIS split-drill osteotomy with soft tissue release offers several advantages over TCO techniques for treating mild to moderate HV with metatarsalgia in middle-aged women, such as reduced trauma, quicker healing, smaller scars, and less pain after surgery.

Weil's osteotomy versus distal metatarsal metaphyseal osteotomy for the treatment of metatarsalgia. A metaanalysis of outcome and complications.

BACKGROUND: Weil's osteotomy (WO) and distal metatarsal metaphyseal osteotomy (DMMO) are considered to be the gold standard of managing metatarsalgia. Stiffness and floating toe are the main disadvantages of the WO, whereas delayed union or malunion and prolonged swelling are the main complications of the DMMO. The purpose of this study is to compare these two methods, in terms of outcome and complications, through a metaanalysis of the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pubmed, Google Scholar and Mendeley databases were searched for studies comparing directly the outcome of DMMO and Weil's osteotomy, with a minimum follow up of six months. The random effects model was used for the metaanalysis. The quality of studies was assessed using the MINORS criteria. RESULTS: Four studies were eligible for the analysis including 211 patients in total. The mean difference of the postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) among the two techniques was - 1,04 (C.I.: -3,50 - 1,43) and - 0,39 (CI: -0,83 - 0,08) respectively. The risk difference regarding postoperative stiffness, swelling and residual metatarsalgia was - 0,09 (95% C.I.: -0,23 - 0,06), - 0,17 (95% C.I.: -0,62 - 0,29) and - 0,06 (95% C.I.: -0,20 - 0,08) respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on the existing literature, Weil's osteotomy and DMMO are equally safe and effective for the treatment of metatarsalgia. More studies of better quality are required, in order to extract safer and absolute conclusions regarding this topic.

Analysis of Nonweightbearing MRI Fat Pad Thickness Under Central Metatarsals in Patients With and Without Metatarsalgia.

BACKGROUND: Metatarsalgia is a common diagnosis for patients with forefoot pain. Many have proposed metatarsal fat pad atrophy is a cause of metatarsalgia and therefore have suggested fat grafting instead of distal metatarsal osteotomies to treat metatarsalgia. For fat grafting to be a viable treatment, fat pad atrophy should correlate with metatarsalgia. This study looked to determine the relationship between metatarsal fat pad thickness and metatarsalgia and the correlation between metatarsal fat pad thickness and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with metatarsalgia and those with foot or ankle osteoarthritis who had a nonweightbearing MRI performed between February 1, 2021, and March 1, 2023. Data collected included demographics, PROMIS scores, metatarsal fat pad thickness in the second and third rays of the affected foot, and thinnest area on coronal section, measured on MRI. Student t test was used to compare continuous variables, whereas the χ2 test was used to compare categorical variables. Multivariable linear regression models were used to control for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were included in this study. Patients with metatarsalgia were significantly more likely to have a lower body mass index (29.3 vs 32.0, P = .03) than patients with osteoarthritis, but this finding was not present when controlling for confounding variables. We found no significant difference in fat pad thickness between patients with metatarsalgia vs patients with foot or ankle osteoarthritis (P = .43). We found no correlation between metatarsal fat pad thickness and pain interference (P = .59), physical function (P = .64), or mobility (P = .94) PROMIS scores. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective comparative study of a relatively small cohort we found no significant difference in metatarsal fat pad thickness for patients with metatarsalgia vs patients with foot and ankle osteoarthritis based on nonweightbearing MRI, and no association between metatarsal fat pad thickness and patient-reported outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case control study.

Comparison of triplanar chevron osteotomy with chevron osteotomy in hallux valgus treatment for the prevention of transfer metatarsalgia.

Hallux valgus (HV) is often accompanied by metatarsalgia. This study compared the radiological and clinical outcomes of new triplanar chevron osteotomy (TCO) and chevron osteotomy (CO) in the treatment of HV, especially for patients with plantar callosities and metatarsalgia. In this retrospective analysis, 90 patients (45 patients per group) with mild to moderate HV and plantar callosities were treated with TCO and CO from July 2020 to January 2022. In both procedures, the apex was located in the center of the head of the first metatarsal bone, and the CO was oriented towards the fourth MTPJ at a 60° angle. Plantar-oblique chevron osteotomy was defined as chevron osteotomy and a 20° plantar tilt; TCO was defined as plantar-oblique chevron osteotomy-based metatarsal osteotomy with a 10° tilt towards the metatarsal head. Primary outcome measures included preoperative and postoperative hallux valgus angle, 1 to 2 intermetatarsal angle (IMA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), first metatarsal length (FML), and second metatarsal head height X-ray images; clinical measurements, including visual analogue scale and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores; changes in callosity grade and area; and changes in the number of people with metatarsalgia. Secondary outcomes included complications, recurrence rates, and cosmetic appearance. The hallux valgus angle, IMA, and DMAA were significantly lower after surgery (P  < .001) in all patients. In the TCO group, the mean FML and second metatarsal head height increased significantly postoperatively (P < .001). The AOFAS and visual analogue scale scores improved postoperatively in both groups (P < .001). All patients experienced satisfactory pain relief and acceptable cosmesis. The plantar callosity areas were smaller postoperatively in both the TCO and CO groups, but the change in the area (Δarea) in the TCO group significantly differed from that in the CO group (P < .001). The number of postoperative patients with metatarsalgia and the plantar callosity grade were both significantly lower in the TCO group than in the CO group after osteotomy (P < .05). TCO prevents dorsal shift of the metatarsal head and preserves and even increases FML, thereby preventing future metatarsalgia in patients. Therefore, compared with CO, TCO has better orthopedic outcomes and is an effective method for treating mild to moderate HV and preventing transfer metatarsalgia.

Is there a tolerance for extension of the first metatarsal after the Lapidus procedure? A clinical, functional, and hindfoot radiographic analysis.

PURPOSE: Based on the tripod concept of load distribution, our study aimed to evaluate whether a slight extension of first metatarsal (M1) that may occur after the Lapidus procedure (LP) could alter the radiographic measurements of the hindfoot and influence clinical and functional outcomes. METHODS: Twenty-five patients (27 feet) were reviewed. Hindfoot radiographic analysis was based on seven measurements. Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated with self-reported questionnaires. Transfer metatarsalgia was also assessed. Correlation analysis was performed according to variations of the studied variables. RESULTS: The average extension of the M1 was 4.26 degrees (p < 0.001). None of the hindfoot radiographic measurements changed significantly (p = 0.13, p = 0.50, p = 0.19, p = 0.70, p = 0.11, p = 0.36, p = 0.83). Patients improved on most questionnaires (p < 0.001). None presented transfer metatarsalgia. No correlation between M1 extension and clinical and functional outcomes was found. CONCLUSION: Possibly there is a tolerance of M1 extension in which it does not alter the radiographic measurements of the hindfoot, overload the lesser metatarsals, or compromise clinical and functional outcomes.

Lateral metatarsal osteotomy.

Lateral metatarsal osteotomy (LMO) aims to reposition the affected metatarsals in a chosen position. The approach may be open or percutaneous. There are several types of LMO, according to displacement: shortening, raising, translation or lengthening. Preoperative planning covers type and extent of displacement, osteotomy location and type (open or percutaneous), and number of metatarsals concerned. In the 1990s, older concepts of non-fixed osteotomies gave way to preoperative planning and calculated shortening, including the development of Weil shortening osteotomy. Diaphyseal lengthening or shortening osteotomy is mainly used for brachymetatarsia. The older concept of non-fixed lateral rays made a comeback with percutaneous first-ray surgery. Distal metatarsal minimally invasive osteotomy (DMMO) is the most effective, giving rise to variants such as distal oblique metatarsal minimally invasive osteotomy (DOMMO), to meet the requirements of greater displacement, especially in shortening and translation, and to be applicable in as wide a range of cases as possible. Presently, these percutaneous techniques have not demonstrated superiority over open surgery, and entail specific complications. Even so, they are now part of the armamentarium of forefoot surgery, as their minimal invasiveness corresponds to current trends in surgery, especially in the foot. Level of evidence: V.

Surgical Treatment of Metatarsalgia and Severe Instability of Lesser Metatarsophalangeal Joints.

The main object of this prospective cohort study was to compare surgical treatment options for primary metatarsalgia and the severe instability of lesser metatarsophalangeal joints. The outcomes of triple Weil osteotomy combined with direct plantar plate repair and triple Weil osteotomy, performed with proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis, are analyzed and compared. One hundred thirteen patients (117 feet) were enrolled in the study. They were split into 2 groups. In the first group, undergoing Weil osteotomy, combined with the plantar plate repair, good results, including complete pain reduction, elimination of hyperkeratosis, and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score improvement, were achieved in 84.7% of the cases. The second group, where the combination of Weil osteotomy and proximal interphalangeal joint K-wire arthrodesis was used, demonstrated good results in 52.4% of the cases. Weil osteotomy, combined with the plantar plate repair, achieves better results in comparison to osteotomy, performed with the interphalangeal joint arthrodesis.

Comparison of modified Mitchell and Chevron osteotomies for hallux valgus.

BACKGROUND: Good clinical and radiological outcomes in mild-moderate hallux valgus (HV) can be achieved with Chevron osteotomy (CO) and modified-Mitchell osteotomy (MMO). The main goal of the present study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes after CO and MMO in HV. METHODS: The study included 45 patients, comprising 40 females with a mean follow-up of 87.5 ± 27.8 months. The outcome measurements of metatarsal length (MT1), HV angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), clinical outcomes, and metatarsalgia were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: No significant difference was determined between the MMO and CO groups in respect of metatarsalgia and AOFAS scores. The CO resulted in a significantly larger decrease in the MT1. The mean HVA and IMA correction was significantly greater after MMO than after CO. CONCLUSION: Since MMO may prevent MT1 shortening, which is a typical problem in the Mitchell osteotomy, MMO may be preferred over CO in patients with preoperative shortened first metatarsal.

Orthopaedic and plastic surgery collaboration in resolution of plantar heloma and metatarsalgia using lipofilling: a retrospective evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Plantar heloma is a keratotic disorder that can be described as a circumscribed area of thickening with a central core that may penetrate the dermis. Although often considered a minor complaint, longstanding lesions can be debilitating and severely impact on person's quality of life. We present the first retrospective case series at long-term follow-up about the use of plantar lipofilling as a treatment for metatarsalgia caused by plantar heloma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients affected by plantar heloma associated to external metatarsalgia underwent plantar lipofilling. The surgical session was performed as an outpatient procedure. Clinical evaluation was performed using the AOFAS lesser metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal (MTP-IP) score. RESULTS: Mean AOFAS lesser MTP-IP score improved from a preoperative score of 66.6 ± 3.2 points (range 47-77 points) to a post-operative score of 92.8 ± 2.7 points (range 86-95 points); all patients were satisfied with the outcome at the final follow-up. Post-operative clinical examination at final follow-up showed an increase in thickness of the subcutaneous layer and a decrease of dermal layer thanks to the supporting and trophic action of fat cells. CONCLUSIONS: Plastic regenerative procedures applicated to a typical foot and ankle surgery field, such as metatarsal overloading, metatarsalgia and forefoot problems, should be encouraged to allow new treatment horizons.

The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Weil osteotomies are performed to surgically treat metatarsalgia, by shortening the metatarsal via either a single distal oblique cut with translation of the metatarsal head (flat-cut) or through the removal of a slice of bone (wedge-cut). The wedge-cut technique purportedly has functional and mechanical advantages over the flat-cut procedure; however, in vivo data and quality of evidence are currently lacking. This study aims to investigate whether wedge-cut Weil osteotomy compared to traditional flat-cut Weil is associated with increased pain relief and fewer complications up to 12 months postoperatively. METHODS: Patient, surgical and clinical data will be collected for 80 consecutive consenting patients electing to undergo surgical treatment of propulsive metatarsalgia in a randomised control trial, embedded within a clinical registry. The primary outcome is patient-reported pain as assessed by the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) - Pain subscale, and the secondary outcome is the incidence of procedure-specific complications at up to 12 months postoperatively. The groups will be randomised using a central computer-based simple randomisation system, with a 1:1 allocation without blocking and allocation concealment. A mixed-effects analysis of covariance will be used to assess the primary outcome, with confounders factored into the model. A binary logistic regression will be used to assess the secondary outcome in a multivariable model containing the same confounders. DISCUSSION: To the best of the authors' knowledge, the trial will be the first to examine the clinical efficacy of the wedge-cut Weil osteotomy compared to the flat-cut technique with a prospective, randomised control design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620001251910. Registered on 23 November 2020.

Hallux valgus with second metatarsalgia: Is second metatarsal Weil osteotomy necessary?

BACKGROUND: The role of concomitant Weil osteotomy to address second toe metatarsalgia during hallux valgus correction is unclear. We aimed to critically analyse outcomes of an additional Weil osteotomy versus isolated Scarf osteotomy.in the management of hallux valgus and second metatarsalgia. METHODS: Patients with second toe metatarsalgia who underwent first metatarsal Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus were enrolled retrospectively. Demographics, radiographic measurements and functional outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6-months and 2-years postoperatively. Between-group significance was established with Fisher exact test, Chi-square or Mann-Whitney U test. Within-group changes from baseline were assessed with paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: 48 feet (34 isolated Scarf, 14 concomitant Weil osteotomy) were included. Both cohorts demonstrated significant improvements across all measures of functional outcome. However, patients with additional Weil osteotomy reported poorer short-term outcomes. CONCLUSION: Superiority of additional Weil osteotomy versus isolated Scarf osteotomy in addressing second toe metatarsalgia or improving functional outcomes was not demonstrated.

Synovial Sarcoma of the Foot as an Atypical Cause of Persistent Metatarsalgia: A Report of 3 Cases.

CASE: Three cases of atypical metatarsalgia are presented, all diagnosed with foot synovial sarcomas (SSs) at different stages of evolution, after a year of medical consultations. One case was treated with marginal excision without requiring bone excision; the second patient required amputation of the first ray; and the third patient, with advanced disease, required amputation through Chopart's joint. CONCLUSION: Metatarsalgia is a recurrent reason for consultation in orthopaedics. Even so, patients with persistent symptoms should be studied further in depth. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging can detect tumor pathology, such as SS, of insidious development.

Complications of Hallux Rigidus Surgery.

Hallux rigidus can be treated with a variety of surgical procedures, including joint preserving techniques, arthrodesis, and arthroplasty. The most commonly reported complications for joint preserving techniques consist of progression of arthritis, continued pain, and transfer metatarsalgia. Although good outcomes have been reported for arthrodesis overall, careful attention must be paid to technique and positioning of the toe to avoid nonunion or malunion. Arthroplasty preserves motion but in the case of failure can present the additional challenge of bone loss. In these scenarios, the authors recommend distraction bone block arthrodesis with structural autograft.

Keller's arthroplasty for hallux rigidus: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Several surgical procedures have been described to treat hallux rigidus. Keller arthroplasty is a joint-sacrificing procedure proposed in 1904. Considering the current trends to mini-invasiveness and the debate about the technique's suitability, this review intends to state Keller arthroplasty results and the conditions where it could be still adopted in the treatment of hallux rigidus. METHODS: Selected articles were reviewed to extract: population data, surgical indications, different surgical techniques, clinical and radiological outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: Seventeen retrospective studies were selected, counting 508 patients. Mean age at surgery was 55 years. Patients were affected by moderate-severe hallux rigidus. Three modified Keller arthroplasty were identified. Good clinical and radiological outcomes were reported. Metatarsalgia was the most frequent complication (12%). CONCLUSION: Despite for many authors KA seems a viable surgical treatment for middle aged and elderly patients affected by moderate-severe hallux rigidus, the available literature provides little evidence on the real efficacy and safety of the technique. A non-negligible percentage of complications may occur, and therefore is essential to set correct indications through an accurate patients' selection.

Risks of injury in distal metatarsal minimally invasive osteotomy when comparing standard and modified techniques: A cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the structures at risk in distal metatarsal mini-invasive osteotomy (DMMO) and to compare standard and intraosseous approaches. METHODS: DMMO was performed on the second and fourth metatarsals of 11 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens. The standard technique was performed in 11 metatarsals. It was then compared to a modified intraosseous technique that entails starting inside the bone in 11 other metatarsals. The cadavers were dissected to identify unintentional injury to soft tissue structures. RESULTS: In the standard group the most injured structures were the metatarsal joint capsules (MJC) (27%), extensor digitorum longus (EDL) (18%), and extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) (9%). The modified intraosseous group injured the EDL (27%), not the MJC (0%) and the EDB (0%). Distances between osteotomies and the dorsal metatarsal head articular surface (DMHAS) were 6.08 ± 3.99 mm in the standard and 9.92 ± 3.42 mm in the modified (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The DMMO techniques most frequently injured the EDL. Intra-articular positioning of the osteotomy was more observed in the standard. Overall, it appears the modified method could be an alternative to the standard DMMO. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The modified minimally invasive DMMO has a comparable rate of potential iatrogenic injuries. This intraosseous procedure may present as an option when planning surgery to the lesser metatarsals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. Comparative Cadaveric Study.

Influence of the Length Ratio Between Second and Third Metatarsals After Modified Weil Osteotomy on Clinical Outcomes.

Metatarsalgia is a frequent foot disorder. The objective was to evaluate whether the length ratio between the second and the third metatarsals after Weil osteotomy influences clinical outcomes. This retrospective study included 37 patients (53 feet). Preoperative planning consisted of keeping the second metatarsal greater than or equal to the third metatarsal after Weil osteotomy of the second metatarsal or the second and third metatarsals. Based on postoperative weightbearing and digital AP radiographs after Weil osteotomy, we divided the patients into 2 groups: group 1, the second metatarsal was longer than or equal to the third metatarsal; and group 2, the second metatarsal was shorter than the third metatarsal. We investigated whether there were differences between the groups. In 35 (66%) feet, the second metatarsal was longer than or equal to the third metatarsal (group 1), and in 18 (34%) feet, the second metatarsal was shorter than the third metatarsal (group 2). Postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores were 86.2 and 82.7, respectively (p = .32). Postoperative Visual Analog Scale scores were 1.26 and 1.67, respectively (p = .39). The sample showed 11.3% of transfer metatarsalgia to the third metatarsal. Group 1 had 9% of transfer metatarsalgia, whereas group 2 had 17% of transfer metatarsalgia (p = .40). The presence of a second metatarsal shorter than the third metatarsal, after Weil osteotomy of the second metatarsal or the second and third metatarsals, does not influence outcomes or incidence of transfer metatarsalgia to the third metatarsal.

Interpositional Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: A Systematic Review.

Hallux rigidus is the most common arthritic condition of the foot. Interpositional arthroplasty (IPA) is indicated for advanced-stage hallux rigidus and attempts to maintain joint motion through insertion of a biologic spacer into the joint. However, the data evaluating the effectiveness of IPA are limited. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the outcomes of IPA in the treatment of hallux rigidus. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically reviewed based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Outcomes collected and analyzed included: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal (HMI) score, visual analogue scale score, short-form 36 score, range of motion (ROM), radiographic parameters, and postoperative complications. The level and quality of clinical evidence were recorded and assessed. Sixteen studies with a total of 428 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria. The mean AOFAS-HMI score improved from 51.6 ± 10.1 (range 35.0-64.2) preoperatively to 86.0 ± 7.7 (range 71.6-95.4) postoperatively (p ≤ .001) at weighted mean follow-up of 58.0 ± 34.5 (range 16.5-135.6) months. The preoperative weighted mean total ROM was 39.3° ± 9.6° (range 24.2-49.9) and the postoperative weighted mean total ROM was 61.5° ± 4.8° (range 54.0-66.5) (p ≤ .001). The complication rate was 21.5% with metatarsalgia as the most commonly reported complication. One study was level 3 and 15 studies were level 4 clinical evidence. This systematic review demonstrates improvement in functional and ROM outcomes following IPA procedure at mid-term follow-up. The procedure however has a moderate complication rate. In addition, there is a low level and quality of evidence in the current literature with inconsistent reporting of data.

Iatrogenic second transfer metatarsalgia and the first metatarsal shortening and elevation after Scarf osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: Transfer metatarsalgia is a potential complication of hallux valgus surgery. This study aimed to investigate the shortened first metatarsal length and elevation and to compare groups with and without second transfer metatarsalgia after Scarf osteotomy. METHODS: The first metatarsal length of 123 feet was measured via the Maestro's method using the metatarsal axial length and the relative second metatarsal protrusion to the first metatarsal. Metatarsal elevation was measured using the first metatarsal angle. RESULTS: Second transfer metatarsalgia occurred after Scarf osteotomy in 11 (8.9%) feet. When baseline characteristics were considered in propensity score matching, the 11 feet were compared with the 33 feet in the control group. The group with transfer metatarsalgia showed a more shortened first metatarsal axial length (-4.1 ± 1.8 mm vs. -2.5 ± 2.2 mm, p = 0.032), a significantly longer relative second metatarsal protrusion (+5.8 ± 2.6 mm vs. +1.2 ± 2.6 mm, p < 0.001), and a significantly lower first metatarsal angle (18.1 ± 4.3° vs. 21.5 ± 4.0°, p = 0.012) than the control group postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: To avoid iatrogenic transfer metatarsalgia, first metatarsal length shortening should be minimized to at least less than 4.0 mm. Furthermore, the metatarsal parabola should be retained.

One-Stage Lengthening and Minimally Invasive Distal Metatarsal Metaphyseal Osteotomy (DMMO) for Brachymetatarsia.

Level of Evidence: Level V.

Ultrasound-guided distal minimally invasive metatarsal osteotomies (US-DMMO): A cadaveric study about its safety and accuracy.

BACKGROUND: Distal minimally invasive metatarsal osteotomies have become increasingly popular. This technique requires fluoroscopic control, but recently, an ultrasound-guided procedure has been described. The aim of this anatomical study was to assess the quality safety of ultrasound-guided minimally invasive metatarsal osteotomies. METHODS: Ultrasound-guided distal minimally invasive metatarsal osteotomies were performed in 9 cadaveric pieces. The location of the osteotomy, its angulation, and the adjacent anatomical structures injuries was evaluated RESULTS: Thirty-six osteotomies were performed. The osteotomy was metaphyseal in 97.2% of the cases, the average angulation was 47.67° (±4.49, 40-59°) and the average distance to the articular cartilage was 3.22 mm (±1.27, 1-7 mm). One osteotomy (2.8%) was intraarticular and there was one joint capsule lesion (2.8%). The failure, the extreme point distance and angulation values, and the joint capsule injury correspond to a fifth metatarsal. CONCLUSIONS: The ultrasound-guided technique is safe and allows a correct location and angulation of the osteotomies.