Long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib versus adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 5-year data from the phase 3, randomised SELECT-COMPARE study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib versus adalimumab from SELECT-COMPARE over 5 years. METHODS: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate were randomised to receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily, placebo or adalimumab 40 mg every other week, all with concomitant methotrexate. By week 26, patients with insufficient response to randomised treatment were rescued; patients remaining on placebo switched to upadacitinib. Patients completing the 48-week double-blind period could enter a long-term extension. Safety and efficacy were assessed through week 264, with radiographic progression analysed through week 192. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy was analysed by randomised group (non-responder imputation (NRI)) or treatment sequence (as observed). RESULTS: Rates of TEAEs were generally similar with upadacitinib versus adalimumab, although numerically higher rates of herpes zoster, lymphopenia, creatine phosphokinase elevation, hepatic disorder and non-melanoma skin cancer were reported with upadacitinib. Numerically greater proportions of patients randomised to upadacitinib versus adalimumab achieved clinical responses (NRI); Clinical Disease Activity Index remission (≤2.8) and Disease Activity Score based on C reactive protein <2.6 were achieved by 24.6% vs 18.7% (nominal p=0.042) and 31.8% vs 23.2% (nominal p=0.006), respectively. Radiographic progression was numerically lower with continuous upadacitinib versus adalimumab at week 192. CONCLUSION: The safety profile of upadacitinib through 5 years was consistent with the known safety profile of upadacitinib, with no new safety risks. Clinical responses were numerically higher with upadacitinib versus adalimumab at 5 years. Upadacitinib demonstrates a favourable benefit-risk profile for long-term rheumatoid arthritis treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02629159.

Analysis of factors influencing target PASI responses and side effects of methotrexate monotherapy in plaque psoriasis: a multicenter study of 1521 patients.

Methotrexate (MTX) is commonly used as first-line systemic treatment agent in psoriasis. We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment responses of patients with psoriasis undergoing MTX monotherapy. Data from adult patients with plaque psoriasis who received MTX monotherapy for at least 3 months between April 2012 and April 2022 were retrospectively evaluated in 19 tertiary care centers. Our study included 722 female and 799 male patients, a total of 1521 participants. The average age of the patients was 44.3 ± 15.5 years. Mode of treatment was oral in 20.4% of patients while in 79.4% it was subcutaneous. The median treatment duration was 8 months (IQR = 5-15). The median weekly dose was 15 mg (IQR = 11-15). 1448 (95.2%) patients were taking folic acid supplementation. At week 12, 16.3% of the patients achieved PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) 90 response while at week 24, 37.3% achieved it. Logistic regression analysis for week 12 identified the following independent factors affecting PASI 90 achievement positively: median weekly MTX dose ≤ 15 mg (P = 0.011), subcutaneous administration (P = 0.005), no prior systemic treatment (< 0.001) and folic acid use (0.021). In logistic regression analysis for week 24; median weekly MTX dose ≤ 15 mg (P = 0.001), baseline PASI ≥ 10 (P < 0.001), no prior systemic treatment (P < 0.004), folic acid use (P = 0.001) and absence of comorbidities (P = 0.009) were determined as independent factors affecting the achievement of PASI 90. Adverse effects were observed in 38.8% of the patients, with nausea/vomiting (23.9%) and transaminase elevation (13%) being the most common. The most common reasons for interruptions (15.3%) and discontinuations (27.1%) of the treatment were patient related individual factors. The use of MTX as the first systemic treatment agent, at doses ≤ 15 mg/week and concurrent folic acid application are positive predictive factors for achieving the target PASI response both at weeks 12 and 24. In our study, which is one of the most comprehensive studies on MTX treatment in psoriasis, we observed that MTX is an effective and safe treatment option.

Urinary methotrexate dosage in rheumatoid arthritis, in patients treated for at least 6 months: a potential marker of adherence.

OBJECTIVES: Non-adherence to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatments must be identified. A methotrexate (MTX) urinary dosage (METU) was recently developed. The aim of our study was to assess adherence to MTX in RA using METU in real-life conditions and to compare it with indirect adherence measurement technics. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study at Reims University Hospital. We included over 18-year-old patients with RA treated by MTX for more than 6 months. Patients were invited to complete demographic, clinical and psychological questionnaires and adherence measurement technics (Compliance Questionnaire of Rheumatology (CQR) and Medication Possession Ratio (MPR)). A urinary sample was collected to measure MTX and information about tolerance was evaluated through Methotrexate Intolerance Severity Score. RESULTS: 84 patients were included, 26 using oral MTX, 58 subcutaneous (SC) MTX. Among them, 73% were female, mean age was 61.5 years, MTX mean dose was 15 mg/week and 61.9% were treated by biological DMARDs (Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs). 77 patients (91.7%) were adherent to treatment according to METU, whereas MPR and CQR reported less adherence (69.5% and 61.9%, respectively). MPR and METU were not significantly different in SC MTX users (p=0.059). Non-adherent patients had a higher number of tender joints and C reactive protein value (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: This is the first largest study evaluating MTX adherence in patients with RA using a urinary dosage. We identified that indirect adherence measurements did not reflect real-life adherence. It would be appreciable to realise METU, in a new study, in patients with RA with unexplained response to treatment, to consider it before escalating therapeutic strategy.

Fisetin ameliorates methotrexate induced liver fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: Methotrexate (MTX), a widely used chemotherapeutic and immunosuppressive agent, is associated with hepatotoxicity, leading to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. This study explores the regenerative and reparative effects of fisetin, a flavonoid with known antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, on MTX-induced liver fibrosis in a rat model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six male Wistar albino rats were divided into normal, MTX and saline, and MTX and fisetin. Liver injury was induced in the latter two groups using a single intraperitoneal dose of MTX (20 mg/kg). Fisetin (50 mg/kg/day) or saline was administered intraperitoneally for ten days. After sacrifice, liver tissues were subjected to histopathological evaluation and biochemical analyses, including Transforming Growth Factor-ß1 (TGF-beta), sirtuins-1 (SIRT-1), malondialdehyde (MDA), cytokeratin 18, thrombospondin 1, and alanine transaminase (ALT) levels. RESULTS: MTX administration significantly increased liver injury markers, including TGF-beta, MDA, cytokeratin 18, thrombospondin 1, and ALT, while reducing SIRT-1 levels. Fisetin treatment attenuated these effects, demonstrating its potential therapeutic impact. Histopathological analysis confirmed that fisetin mitigated MTX-induced hepatocyte necrosis, fibrosis, and cellular infiltration. CONCLUSIONS: This study proves that fisetin administration can alleviate MTX-induced liver damage in rats. The reduction in oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis, along with the histological improvements, suggests fisetin's potential as a therapeutic agent against MTX-induced hepatotoxicity. Further investigations and clinical studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess fisetin's translational potential in human cases of MTX-induced liver damage.

Contribution of aldehyde oxidase to methotrexate-induced hepatotoxicity: in vitro and pharmacoepidemiological approaches.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) is partially metabolized by aldehyde oxidase (AOX) in the liver and its clinical impact remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate how AOX contributes to MTX-induced hepatotoxicity in vitro and clarify the relationship between concomitant AOX inhibitor use and MTX-associated liver injury development using the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHODS: We assessed intracellular MTX accumulation and cytotoxicity using HepG2 cells. We used the FAERS database to detect reporting odds ratio (ROR)-based MTX-related hepatotoxicity event signals. RESULTS: AOX inhibition by AOX inhibitor raloxifene and siRNA increased the MTX accumulation in HepG2 cells and enhanced the MTX-induced cell viability reduction. In the FAERS analysis, the ROR for MTX-related hepatotoxicity increased with non-overlap of 95% confidence interval when co-administered with drugs with higher Imax, u (maximum unbound plasma concentration)/IC50 (half-maximal inhibitory concentration for inhibition of AOX) calculated based on reported pharmacokinetic data. CONCLUSION: AOX inhibition contributed to MTX accumulation in the liver, resulting in increased hepatotoxicity. Our study raises concerns regarding MTX-related hepatotoxicity when co-administered with drugs that possibly inhibit AOX activity at clinical concentrations.

Large-vessel vasculitis possibly induced by BRAF and MEK inhibitors for BRAF V600E positive lung adenocarcinoma.

The combination therapy of v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors is approved for treating patients with BRAF V600E-positive tumours, including melanoma and lung cancer. Several case reports indicated autoimmune side effects associated with the use of BRAF and MEK inhibitors. Still, the effects of these drugs on the immune system were not fully elucidated. Here, we report a patient with large-vessel vasculitis diagnosed after initiation of treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib for BRAF V600E-positive metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. She was a never-smoker woman in her early 70s who presented with a chronic cough and was diagnosed with BRAF V600E-positive metastatic lung adenocarcinoma by transbronchial lung biopsy. She was successfully treated with prednisolone and methotrexate while BRAF and MEK inhibitors were continued. We should be careful about autoimmune diseases using BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

Medication error with methotrexate. / Feildosering av metotreksat.

Background: A woman in her seventies presented to the accident and emergency department (A&E) with shortness of breath that had increased over a period of three weeks. She had a history of COPD, hypertension and polymyalgia rheumatica. A medication error involving methotrexate, used for autoimmune diseases, was discovered during her medical history review. Case presentation: The patient arrived with stable vital signs, including 94 % oxygen saturation and a respiratory rate of 20 breaths/min. She had been taking 2.5 mg of methotrexate daily for the past three weeks instead of the prescribed weekly dose of 15 mg. Other examinations revealed no alarming findings, except for a slightly elevated D-dimer level. Interpretation: Considering her medical history and exclusion of other differential diagnoses, methotrexate toxicity was suspected. The patient was admitted to the hospital and intravenous folinic acid was initiated as an antidote treatment. Five days later, the patient was discharged with an improvement in the shortness of breath. This case underscores the importance of effective communication in health care, particularly in complex cases like this, where understanding dosages and administration is crucial. Medical history, clinical examinations and medication reviews, often involving clinical pharmacists, are vital in the A&E to reveal medication errors.

TNF-α promoter hypomethylation is frequent in oncopediatric patients who recovered from mucositis.

The aim of this study was to investigate the DNA methylation profile in genes encoding catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD3) enzymes, which are involved in oxidative stress mechanisms, and in genes encoding pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-6 (IL6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in the oral mucosa of oncopediatric patients treated with methotrexate (MTX®). This was a cross-sectional observational study and the population comprised healthy dental patients (n = 21) and those with hematological malignancies (n = 64) aged between 5 and 19 years. Oral conditions were evaluated using the Oral Assessment Guide and participants were divided into 4 groups: 1- healthy individuals; 2- oncopediatric patients without mucositis; 3- oncopediatric patients with mucositis; 4- oncopediatric patients who had recovered from mucositis. Methylation of DNA from oral mucosal cells was evaluated using the Methylation-Specific PCR technique (MSP). For CAT, the partially methylated profile was the most frequent and for SOD3 and IL6, the hypermethylated profile was the most frequent, with no differences between groups. For TNF-α, the hypomethylated profile was more frequent in the group of patients who had recovered from mucositis. It was concluded that the methylation profiles of CAT, SOD3, and IL6 are common profiles for oral cells of children and adolescents and have no association with oral mucositis or exposure to chemotherapy with MTX®. Hypomethylation of TNF-α is associated with oral mucosal recovery in oncopediatric patients who developed oral mucositis during chemotherapy.

Genetic polymorphisms and clinical parameters associated with renal toxicity in Thai hematologic malignancy patients receiving high dose methotrexate.

High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is a widely used chemotherapy regimen for hematologic malignancies such as lymphomas and acute lymphoblastic leukemia, but its use can lead to adverse effects, including acute kidney injury (AKI), impaired liver function, and mucositis, causing extended hospital stays and delayed subsequent chemotherapy. Our study aimed to investigate the predictive factors for renal toxicities associated with HD-MTX in Thai patients undergoing treatment for hematologic malignancies. We enrolled 80 patients who underwent MTX-containing regimens, analyzing 132 chemotherapy cycles. The most common disease was primary central nervous system lymphoma (33%). Genetic polymorphisms were examined using the MassARRAY® system, identifying 42 polymorphisms in 25 genes. Serum creatinine and MTX levels were measured 24 and 48 h after MTX administration. For the primary outcome, we found that the allele A of MTRR rs1801394 was significantly related to renal toxicity (odds ratio 2.084 (1.001-4.301), p-value 0.047). Patients who exceeded the MTX threshold levels at 24 h after the dose had a significantly higher risk of renal toxicity (OR (95%CI) = 6.818 (2.350-19.782), p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis with a generalized estimated equation revealed hypertension and age as independent predictors of increased MTX levels at 24 h after the given dose.

Mycophenolate and methotrexate are better tolerated than azathioprine in myasthenia gravis.

Azathioprine is recommended as the first-line steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agent for myasthenia gravis. Mycophenolate and methotrexate are often considered as second-line choices despite widespread consensus on their efficacy. We aimed to gather real-world data comparing the tolerability and reasons for discontinuation for these agents, by performing a national United Kingdom survey of side effects and reasons for discontinuation of immunosuppressants in myasthenia gravis. Of 235 patients, 166 had taken azathioprine, 102 mycophenolate, and 40 methotrexate. The most common side effects for each agent were liver dysfunction for azathioprine (23 %), diarrhoea for mycophenolate (14 %), and fatigue for methotrexate (18 %). Women were generally more likely to experience side effects of immunosuppressants. Azathioprine was significantly more likely to be discontinued than mycophenolate and methotrexate due to side effects. There was no significant difference in treatment cessation due to lack of efficacy. This study highlights the significant side-effect burden of treatment for myasthenia gravis. Mechanisms to reduce azathioprine toxicity should be utilised, however mycophenolate and methotrexate appear to be good treatment choices if teratogenicity is not a concern. Women are disadvantaged due to higher frequency of side effects and considerations around pregnancy and breastfeeding. Treatments with improved tolerability are needed.

Precise timing of audiovisual stimulation conquers chemobrain.

In a recent study, Kim et al. utilized gamma entrainment using sensory stimuli (GENUS) to rescue cognitive impairment and glial dysregulation associated with cisplatin and methotrexate chemotherapy, specifically when applied both throughout and after chemotherapy administration. GENUS provides a time-dependent, non-invasive method for treating chemobrain, with broader implications for resolving neurodegenerative neuroinflammation.

Polymorphic lymphoproliferative disorder arising in a rheumatoid arthritis patient, presenting as fibrin-associated large B-cell lymphoma-like lesions in aortic and mitral valves.

We herein report a case of methotrexate-associated lymphoproliferative disorder (MTX-LPD) showing fibrin-associated large B-cell lymphoma-like heart valve lesions, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive mucocutaneous ulcer-like cutaneous and oral mucosal lesions. MTX-LPD is a critical complication that can occur in RA patients who are treated with MTX. EBV also plays a defining or important role in LPDs. Among the sites of MTX-LPD, 40-50% occur in extranodal sites, including the gastrointestinal tract, skin, liver, lung, and kidney. There are few reports of MTX-LPDs involving the heart valves, and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first case to be reported in the English literature. The possibility of EBV-positive LPD should be considered in RA patients, even in patients with an atypical site, as in this case.

An observational study of root-cause analysis of medication errors in elderly with methotrexate toxicity.

INTRODUCTION: Medication errors are inherent in a healthcare system. This results in both time and cost burdens for both the patient and the health system. The aim of this study was to conduct a root-cause analysis of medication errors in elderly patients with methotrexate toxicity, analyze associated factors, and propose solutions. METHODS: This single-center prospective study was designed to identify medication errors in cases of methotrexate toxicity between November 2022 to May 2023. Categorical data and free-text data are used to describe incidents. Harm assessment, factors related to medication errors, and preventability were evaluated for each case. Possible strategies to prevent similar occurrences are discussed. RESULTS: Out of a total of 15 patients who presented during the study period, nine suffered from methotrexate toxicity due to medication errors. Most medication errors occurred during prescribing or dispensing (seven cases). Inadequate knowledge about medication and dosage, inadequate communication was identified as a contributing factor for all medication errors. Patients on long-term methotrexate treatment are at high risk of methotrexate toxicity. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the challenges of health literacy and lacking communication between healthcare providers and patients that can be met through community pharmacy programs for the elderly in lower-middle-income countries.

Rheumatology: What You May Have Missed in 2023.

Many patients with rheumatologic conditions receive care from physicians other than rheumatologists. Here we note key findings from 6 studies in rheumatology published in 2023 that offer valuable insights for internal medicine specialists and subspecialists outside of rheumatology. The first study investigated the effect of low-dose glucocorticoids on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over 2 years and challenged existing perceptions about the risks of glucocorticoids in this setting. The second study focused on the updated guideline for preventing and treating glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. With the chronic and widespread use of glucocorticoids, the American College of Rheumatology emphasized the importance of assessing fracture risk and initiating pharmacologic therapy when appropriate. The third study explored the potential use of methotrexate in treating inflammatory hand osteoarthritis, suggesting a novel approach to managing this challenging and common condition. The results of the fourth article we highlight suggest that sarilumab has promise as an adjunct treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica relapse during glucocorticoid dosage tapering. The fifth study evaluated sublingual cyclobenzaprine for fibromyalgia treatment, noting both potential benefits and risks. Finally, the sixth article is a systematic review and meta-analysis that assessed the therapeutic equivalence of biosimilars and reference biologics in the treatment of patients with RA. Knowledge of this recent literature will be useful to clinicians regardless of specialty who care for patients with these commonly encountered conditions.

Detection of significant liver fibrosis in Chinese psoriasis patients receiving methotrexate: a comparison between transient elastography and liver histology.

INTRODUCTION: Methotrexate (MTX) is effective for treating psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, but its potential hepatoxicity remains a concern. Liver biopsy, the gold standard for detecting MTX-induced liver injury, is invasive and carries considerable risk. Transient elastography (TE) offers a non-invasive alternative for detecting advanced liver fibrosis. This study investigated the performance of TE in detecting MTX-induced liver fibrosis among Chinese psoriasis patients, compared with liver biopsy. METHODS: This study included adult patients with clinical psoriasis. Liver stiffness measurement using TE was performed in patients receiving MTX. Exclusion criteria were known liver cirrhosis, positive viral hepatitis carrier status, or conditions influencing TE performance. Liver biopsy was performed when liver stiffness was ≥7.1 kilopascals (kPa) or when the total cumulative dose (TCD) of MTX was ≥3.5 g. RESULTS: A total of 228 patients were screened; among 34 patients who met the inclusion criteria, nine (26.5%) had significant liver fibrosis (Roenigk grade ≥3a). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.76 (95% confidence interval=0.59-0.93; P=0.021), indicating that TE had satisfactory performance in detecting liver fibrosis. A cut-off value of 7.1 kPa of liver stiffness yielded 100% sensitivity and 68% specificity. Liver fibrosis was not correlated with the TCD of MTX or the duration of MTX use; it was significantly correlated with obesity and diabetes status (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, waist circumference ≥138 cm, and glycated haemoglobin level ≥7.8%). CONCLUSION: Transient elastography is reliable and superior to the TCD for detecting liver fibrosis in Chinese psoriasis patients receiving MTX. Liver biopsy should be reserved for high-risk patients or patients with liver stiffness ≥11.7 kPa on TE.

Cetuximab versus methotrexate in first-line treatment of older, frail patients with inoperable recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (ELAN UNFIT): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: At present, there is no established standard treatment for frail older patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of cetuximab to those of methotrexate (the reference regimen) in this population. METHODS: This randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial was done at 20 hospitals in France. Patients aged 70 years or older, assessed as frail by the ELAN Geriatric Evaluation, with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the first-line setting and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive cetuximab 500 mg/m2 intravenously every 2 weeks or methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously every week, with minimisation by ECOG performance status, type of disease evolution, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, serum albumin concentration, and geriatrician consultation. To avoid deterministic minimisation and assure allocation concealment, patients were allocated with a probability of 0·80 to the treatment that most reduced the imbalance. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival (defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression, death, discontinuation of treatment, or loss of 2 or more points on the Activities in Daily Living scale, whichever occurred first) and was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. 151 failures expected out of 164 patients were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·625 with 0·05 alpha error, with 80% power. A futility interim analysis was planned when approximately 80 failures were observed, based on failure-free survival. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01884623) and was stopped for futility after the interim analysis. FINDINGS: Between Nov 7, 2013, and April 23, 2018, 82 patients were enrolled (41 to the cetuximab group and 41 to the methotrexate group); 60 (73%) were male, 37 (45%) were aged 80 years or older, 35 (43%) had an ECOG performance status of 2, and 36 (44%) had metastatic disease. Enrolment was stopped for futility at the interim analysis. At the final analysis, median follow-up was 43·3 months (IQR 30·8-52·1). At data cutoff, all 82 patients had failure; failure-free survival did not differ significantly between the groups (median 1·4 months [95% CI 1·0-2·1] in the cetuximab group vs 1·9 months [1·1-2·6] in the methotrexate group; adjusted HR 1·03 [95% CI 0·66-1·61], p=0·89). The frequency of patients who had grade 3 or worse adverse events was 63% (26 of 41) in the cetuximab group and 73% (30 of 41) in the methotrexate group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the cetuximab group were fatigue (four [10%] of 41 patients), lung infection (four [10%]), and rash acneiform (four [10%]), and those in the methotrexate group were fatigue (nine [22%] of 41), increased gamma-glutamyltransferase (seven [17%]), natraemia disorder (four [10%]), anaemia (four [10%]), leukopenia (four [10%]), and neutropenia (four [10%]). The frequency of patients who had serious adverse events was 44% (18 of 41) in the cetuximab group and 39% (16 of 41) in the methotrexate group. Four patients presented with a fatal adverse event in the cetuximab group (sepsis, decreased level of consciousness, pulmonary oedema, and death of unknown cause) as did two patients in the methotrexate group (dyspnoea and death of unknown cause). INTERPRETATION: The study showed no improvement in failure-free survival with cetuximab versus methotrexate. Patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 did not benefit from these systemic therapies. New treatment options including immunotherapy should be explored in frail older patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, after an initial geriatric evaluation, such as the ELAN Geriatric Evaluation. FUNDING: French programme PAIR-VADS 2011 (sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, the Fondation ARC and the Ligue Contre le Cancer), GEMLUC, GEFLUC, and Merck Santé. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.