Outcome of Endoscopic Myringoplasty Using Gelfoam Versus no Gelfoam in Tympanic Cavity and External Auditory Canal.

Background Absorbable gelatin sponge (gelfoam) is used routinely during myringoplasty as a scaffold that supports tympanic membrane grafts and ossicular chain and to promote hemostasis. However, gelfoam could cause fibrosis, adhesions, granulations, new bone formation within the middle ear cavity and could obstruct the tympanic ostium of the eustachian tube and affects inner ear function and also interferes with the healing process of neodrum and middle ear cavity. Objective To compare the outcome of endoscopic myringoplasty with and without use of gelfoam in external auditory canal and tympanic cavity. Method Fifty patients, with 25 patients in each group who underwent endoscopic myringoplasty with and without gelfoam packing in middle ear cavity and external auditory canal were enrolled in the study. The hearing outcome was assessed by comparing pre-operative ABG (Air bone gap) with post-operative air bone gap and air bone gap closure in speech frequencies (0.5kHz,1kHz, 2kHz,4kHz). The status of graft and hearing results was evaluated on 3months of follow-up in both the groups. Result Out of total 25 patients enrolled for study in both non gelfoam packing group (NGFPG) and gelfoam packing group (GFPG), 24(96%) had graft uptake in each group. The audiological gain in non gelfoam packing group was 11.15±2.4dB whereas in gelfoam packing group it was 12.45±0.81dB. The audiological gain between the two groups did not show any statistically significant (p= 0.190). However, the pre and postoperative hearing difference was statistically significant(p=0.001) in both non gelfoam packing group and gelfoam packing group. Conclusion This study concluded that non gelfoam packing group has similar graft uptake and hearing gain when compared with gelfoam packing group in endoscopic myringoplasty. Hence, myringoplasty can be performed safely without using any gelfoam in the middle ear cavity.

Tympanic Membrane Regeneration Therapy for Pediatric Tympanic Membrane Perforation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate tympanic membrane regeneration therapy (TMRT) for pediatric tympanic membrane perforations (TMPs). STUDY DESIGN: Intervention study. SETTING: Research institute hospital. PATIENTS: In this study, 20 patients with chronic TMP (M/F: 13/7, 13/8 ears, age 0-15 years) treated with TMRT were evaluated. As comparison, 20 pediatric patients with chronic TMP who underwent myringoplasty/tympanoplasty were included. INTERVENTIONS: For the TM repair procedure, the edge of the TMP was disrupted mechanically, and gelatin sponge immersed in basic fibroblast growth factor was placed inside and outside the tympanic cavity and covered with fibrin glue. The TMP was examined 4 ± 1 weeks later. The protocol was repeated up to four times until closure was complete. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Closure of the TMP and hearing improvement were evaluated at 16 weeks after the final regenerative procedure. Adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 427.1 days. The TM regenerated in all cases, but pinhole reperforation occurred in two cases, and the final closure rate was 90.5% (19 of 21). Hearing improved to 24.9 ± 7.6 dB on average before surgery and to 13.8 ± 5.4 dB after surgery. The AB gap improved from 12.9 ± 8.0 to 5.2 ± 3.5 dB.The myringoplasty/tympanoplasty group had significantly lower AB gap improvement compared with the TMRT group. There were no adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: TMRT can be expected to regenerate near-normal TMs with a high closure ratio, resulting in better-hearing improvement compared with the myringoplasty/tympanoplasty group, and is an effective treatment for children with long life expectancy.

Tympanic Cavity Packing in Tympanoplasty Type 1: A Meta-Analysis.

Packing of tympanic cavity is generally considered an essential step in myringoplasty. However, each packing material comes with one or another side effect. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the results of Type 1 myringoplasty with or without packing. Pubmed, Cochrane database, Embase, Google Scholar, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched using 'tympanoplasty or myringoplasty and packing' as the search query. All RCTs / quasi-RCTs comparing tympanoplasty Type 1 with packing (control) versus without packing (intervention) of tympanic cavity in the human population were included. For dichotomous and continuous outcomes, relative risks (RR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated with 95% confidence interval, respectively. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Publication bias was checked using funnel plot and Egger's test, if applicable. Quality of evidence was assessed for each outcome using GRADE approach. Eleven studies were deemed eligible. For graft uptake and functional success rate, RR of 1.01 and 1.05 were obtained, respectively, showing no significant differences between the intervention and control groups. At 1st and 3rd postoperative month, no-packing group showed 3.86 dB and 2.08 dB better air-bone gap (ABG) closure than the packing group, respectively. Also, intervention with no-packing was 9.28-minute shorter procedure. With RR 0.35, no-packing had significantly lesser postoperative aural fullness. Type 1 tympanoplasty performed with or without packing show comparable results in terms of graft uptake and functional success rate. However, if performed without packing, it takes shorter time, provides early hearing improvement and causes less aural fullness. Key Words: Tympanoplasty Type 1, Packing, Gelfoam, No-packing, Meta-analysis, Endoscopic myringoplasty.

Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Butterfly Inlay Cartilage Myringoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To review a 3-year case series of endoscopic butterfly inlay cartilage myringoplasty performed by a single surgeon (W.S.K.) and analyze the clinical surgical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary care academic center. PATIENTS: We enrolled 60 ears with tympanic membrane (TM) perforation, receiving endoscopic inlay butterfly myringoplasty between 2019 and 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We reviewed patients' demographics, size and location of TM perforation, operation time, complications, and postoperative pain evaluated by the numerical rating scale (NRS). We analyzed the graft uptake success rate in 5 weeks and the perforation closure rate in 4 months after surgery. We also compared the air-bone gap (ABG) before and after the surgery. RESULTS: Among the 60 ears included, the mean age was 57.0 years, and 78.3% (47 of 60) had small perforations. The average operation time was 48.9 ± 11.5 minutes, and the postoperative NRS was 2.0 ± 1.6. The immediate graft uptake success rate evaluated at postoperative 5 weeks was 96.7% (58 of 60), with myringitis occurring in three ears. Except for 11 patients lost to follow-up, the perforation closure rate evaluated at postoperative 4 months was 100% (49 of 49). The mean ABG significantly improved from preoperative status (8.87 ± 5.51 dB HL) to postoperative 4 months (6.22 ± 6.03 dB HL) ( p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: A single surgeon's success rate for endoscopic butterfly inlay cartilage myringoplasty was almost 100%. This surgical procedure is safe and effective, with a high graft success rate.

Bilateral same-day myringoplasty: a feasible option?

PURPOSE: Retrospective evaluation of bilateral same-day myringoplasty outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent bilateral same-day myringoplasty from 2005 to 2019. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients underwent bilateral myringoplasty. Mean age was 44.5 years and 55.3% patients were male. Tragal perichondrium-cartilage composite graft was the most frequently used graft material (82.9%). Perforation closure was achieved in 78.9%. Postoperative Pure Tone Average and Air-Bone Gap decreased significantly (p < 0.05), except for the Air-Bone Gap of the right ear (p = 0.058). The complications were cholesteatoma (1.3%), otorrhea (6.6%) and tympanic membrane retraction (1.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral same-day myringoplasty is a feasible procedure in selected patients. Good anatomic and functional outcomes, as well as a low rate of complications, are achieved with this procedure, improving patient comfort and allowing for a reduction in operation time and costs.

Sometimes less is more: experience with endoscopic myringoplasty.

A retrospective review of the outcomes of patients who underwent endoscopic myringoplasties in our institution was conducted. The aim was to highlight our results with this procedure. The database of patient records was manually checked, and the patients who had undergone Endoscopic Myringoplasties were identified, and their demographics, admitting notes, operating notes, and discharge summaries were reviewed. Graft failure was considered if the patient had a perforation in the graft during the outpatient follow-up. The information was compiled, and basic statistics were derived. A total of 31 patients were identified who had undergone Endoscopic Myringoplasty. Patients' age ranged from 14-52 years. None of the patients developed any immediate postoperative complications. Follow-up otoscopic examination showed 28 patients with an intact graft and only one patient with graft failure. Two patients were lost to follow up. Our success rate with Endoscopic Myringoplasty is 96.6%, which is comparable to the international standard success rate of 80-95%. The results of this study encourage adopting an endoscopic approach where the expertise is available.

Effects of no perforation margin trimming and EAC packing in cartilage underlay myringoplasty for chronic large perforations in children.

OBJECTIVE: Trimming of perforation margins and external auditory canal (EAC) packing are basic procedures in underlay myringoplasty for repairing chronic perforations. The objective of this study was to compare the operation time, graft outcome, hearing improvement, and complications of endoscopic cartilage underlay myringoplasty with and without trimming of perforation margins and EAC packing in children. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pediatric patients older than 12 years with chronic perforations were randomly divided into two groups: myringoplasty with trimming of perforation margin and EAC packing (TPME) group or no trimming of perforation margin and EAC packing (NTPME) group. The operation time, graft success rate, hearing improvement, and complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were ultimately included in the study. The mean operation time was 31.4 ± 4.2 min in the TPME group and 23.6 ± 1.7 min in the NTPME group; the difference was significant (P < 0.01). The rate of aural fullness significantly differed between the TPME and NTPME groups (P = 0.000). All participants were followed up for 12 months; the graft success rate did not significantly differ between the groups (88.5% vs. 96.2%; P = 0.603). No patients developed adhesive otitis media. Between the preoperative and postoperative measurements, the mean air-bone gap improved by 10.2 ± 2.8 dB in the TPME group and 11.6 ± 0.7 dB in the NTPME group; this was significant (P < 0.001) in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic cartilage underlay myringoplasty NTPME shorted the operation time and avoided aural fullness and EAC discomfort compared with the TPME technique; however, graft success and hearing improvement were comparable between the two techniques for repairing large perforations in children.

Myringoplasty - A Rewiev of 438 Cases.

The medical records of 438 patients who underwent myringoplasty followed up for a minimum of one year in the period of 1980 and 2015 were revised. Examination under otomicroscope was done of the ear to be operated. This was carried out with a speculum under the operating microscope to be reliably asses the tympanic membrane, site of perforation, to rule out any other pathology and assess the status of ossicular chain. All the patients submitted primary myringoplasty surgery were operated under postauricular, endaural and transcanal approach with overlay, underlay and inlay methods. In the study the patients were divided into three groups depending upon the technique utilized to repair the tympanic membrane. When we compared overlay technique group with underlay technique group, it was observed that overlay technique was no statistically significant difference between these three groups in term of age wise distribution, gender wise distribution, duration of disease and cause of disease, due to matching at the time of selection. In this study the outcome in terms of graft uptake rate was slight better in the overlay technique (94%) as compared to the underlay technique (86.2%), though the difference was statistically insignificant, P>0.05. Patients selection may have had a role in the high success rate in the present study as patients presenting with middle ear pathology were excluded. The complications rate in the present study was quite low, no case in inlay group, three cases of graft lateralization in underlay group, and 19 cases in overlay group. In this study, better results were achieved with overlay technique may probably be due to less surgical manipulation and faster healing process.

Tympanic Perforations in Children: When to Propose Surgical Closure?

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the impact of age and other prognostic factors on the success of myringoplasty. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case series. SETTINGS: Pediatric ENT department of a tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: Two hundred forty-one children (318 ears) aged 3 to 17 years with tympanic perforation. INTERVENTION: Myringoplasty performed between 2009 and 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The rate of tympanic closure, perforation recurrence, revision surgery, and audiometric gain were collected. The impact of age and anatomical and surgical factors was analyzed for each procedure. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up time of 1 year, the tympanic closure rate was 87.7%, the perforation recurrence rate was 18.6%, and 16.7% of ears required reoperation. The mean air-bone gap decreased from 21 dB preoperatively to 12 dB postoperatively ( p < 0.0001). We did not find different anatomical and audiometric results for our three groups of patients classified according to age. Audiometric results were associated with the location of the perforation, intraoperative inflammation of the middle ear mucosa, and the surgical technique performed. CONCLUSION: Myringoplasty in children is associated with excellent anatomical and functional results, even in the youngest patients. It can be proposed whatever the child's age if the patients are well selected before giving the indication.

[The technique and application of individualized tympanic membrane flap in the repair of tympanic membrane under endoscopy ear surgery].

Objective:To investigate the technique of personalized flap making under otoscopy and its clinical application. Methods:The clinical data of patients who underwent 301 Military Hospital myringoplasty in the Department of otoendoscopic surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, from October 2022 to 2023 August were analyzed retrospectively, all enrolled patients were performed independently by the same skilled otoendoscopic surgeon. The patients' general condition, medical history, tympanic membrane perforation scope, perforation size, need for tympanic cavity exploration, thickness of skin flap, tympanic cavity lesion scope, skin flap making method and postoperative rehabilitation were collected. Results:Many factors such as the location of tympanic membrane perforation, the thickness of the skin flap, the degree of curvature or stricture of the ear canal and the extent of the lesion in the tympanic cavity should be considered in the manufacture of the individualized tympanic membrane skin flap, the way of skin flap making does not affect the long-term postoperative rehabilitation, but it can effectively avoid unnecessary ear canal skin flap injury and improve the operation efficiency. Conclusion:Scientific flap fabrication is important for improving surgical efficiency and enhancing surgical confidence.

Additional cartilage reinforcement of the annulus in myringoplasty for subtotal perforation.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, graft success, hearing outcome, and complications were compared following the repair of subtotal perforation using a cartilage reinforcement underlay technique (CRUT) versus the traditional cartilage underlay technique (TCUT). STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients with subtotal perforations were prospectively randomized to the CRUT (n = 38) or TCUT (n = 38) group. The graft success rate, hearing outcome, and complications were compared at 12 months. RESULTS: The mean operation time was 32.9 ± 4.2 (range: 26-47) min in the CRUT group and 51.8 ± 6.3 (range: 48-73) min in the TCUT group (P < 0.001). At 12 months postoperatively, no residual perforation was seen in either group. The graft success rate was 94.7 % (36/38) in the CRUT group and 92.1 % (35/38) in the TCUT group; the difference was not significant (P = 0.643). The postoperative air bone gap (ABG) was significantly improved compared to the preoperative value in both groups, without significant between-group differences in either the preoperative (P = 0.741) or postoperative (P = 0.865) ABG or the mean ABG gain (P = 0.812). Additionally, there were no significant between-group differences in the preoperative (P = 0.887) or postoperative (P = 0.753) mean bone-conduction pure tone average. In the TCUT group, seven (18.4 %) patients developed temporary hypogeusia and two (5.3 %) had external auditory canal scarring. Graft cholesteatoma was not observed in either group. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of subtotal perforations, lateral reinforcement of the annulus with additional cartilage is simpler than traditional cartilage underlay for achieving graft and hearing success. The technique also does not involve raising the tympanomeatal flap or removing perforation margins.

Endoscopic Perichondrium-Cartilage Myringoplasty With Preserving of Anterior Margins and Tuck Grafts for Repairing Anterior Perforation With 3 year Followup.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the graft outcomes of endoscopic perichondrium-cartilage myringoplasty with preserving of anterior margins for repairing anterior perforation with 3 year followup. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective study in 47 patients with anterior perforation who underwent perichondrium-cartilage myringoplasty with preserving of anterior margins and tuck grafts. The operation time, graft success rate, hearing outcome, and complications were evaluated at 6 months and 3 years after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 47 ears with anterior marginal perforation were included in the study. The perforation size was subtotal in 2 (4.3%) eras, large in 11 (23.4%) ears, medium in 27 (57.4%) ears, and small in 7 (14.9%). The mean operation time was 41.2 ± 5.4 minutes. All patients completed 6 months of follow-up. Residual perforation was observed in 2 patients with medium perforations, the graft success rate was 95.7% (45/47). The mean preoperative and postoperative AC PTAs were 38.1 ± 7.3 dB and 25.4 ± 4.6 dB (P < .05), while the mean preoperative and postoperative BC PTAs were 9.0 ± 4.6 dB and 9.6 ± 1.9 dB (P = .672). The functional success was 91.5% (43/47). None of the patients reported sensorineural hearing loss, altered taste, facial nerve palsy, vertigo, or tinnitus during the follow-up period. In addition, 34 (72.3%) patients completed 3 years followup and performed temporal bone CT examination, the mean followup time was 39.1 ± 2.7 months, CT revealed the well pneumatization of mastoids and middle ear. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic perichondrium-cartilage myringoplasty with preserving of anterior margins and tuck grafts is a safe, suitable, and reliable method for repair of anterior perforation with few risk of anterior blunting and lateralization.

Comparison of perichondrium-cartilage button technique and traditional over-underlay technique for repairing large perforations.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to compare the operation time, graft outcomes and complications between the endoscopic cartilage-perichondrium button technique and over-under technique for repairing large perforations. METHODS: A total of 52 chronic large perforations were randomly allocated to receive treatment using the endoscopic cartilage-perichondrium button technique (n = 26) or over-under technique (n = 26). The graft outcomes, mean operation time and post-operative complications were compared between the two groups at 12 months. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 52 patients with unilateral chronic large perforations. All patients completed 12 months of follow up. The mean operation time was 32.3 ± 4.2 minutes in the button technique group and 51.6 ± 2.8 minutes in the over-underlay technique group (p < 0.01). The graft success rate at 12 months was 92.3 per cent (24 out of 26) in the button technique group and 96.2 per cent (25 out of 26) in the over-underlay group (p = 0.552). CONCLUSION: The endoscopic cartilage-perichondrium button technique had similar graft success rates and hearing outcomes for large chronic perforations to the over-under technique, but significantly shortened the mean operation time.

Comparison of two endoscopic perichondrium-cartilage graft underlay myringoplasty for large perforations: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the graft outcomes and complications of two endoscopic perichondrium-cartilage graft techniques for repairing large perforations. STUDY DESIGN: Single center blinded randomized controlled trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 61 large perforations more than 50% of TM area were prospectively randomized to undergo the free perichondrium and free cartilage graft group (FPFC, n = 31) or perichondrium partial attachment the cartilage graft group (PPAC, n = 30). The primary outcome measures were the operation time; secondary outcome measures were the graft success rate and hearing gain at 12 months postoperatively and postoperative complications. RESULTS: All patients completed follow-up of 12 months. The mean operation time was 38.2 ± 2.3 min in the FPFC group and 37.4 ± 5.6 min in the PPAC group (P = 0.658). At postoperative 3 months, the graft success rates were 96.7% in the FPFC group and 93.3% in the PPAC group (P = 0.976). At postoperative 12 months, the graft success rates were 96.7% in the FPFC group and 83.3% in the PPAC group (P = 0.182). However, the residual and re-perforation rate with no infection was 0.0% (0/31) in the FPFC group and 16.7% (5/30) in the PPAC group (P = 0.056). No significant between-group differences were observed pre- (P = 0.842) or post- (P = 0.759) operative air bone gap (ABG) values or mean ABG gain (P = 0.886). However, granular myringitis has been noted in 6.5% in the FPFC group and in 3.3% in the PPAC group. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that 12-month graft success and hearing gain were comparable between the perichondrium free and partial attachment the cartilage graft techniques, nevertheless, partial attachment technique could increase residual and re-perforations.

Comparison of endoscope-assisted and microscope-assisted type I tympanoplasty; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze and compare the available data about the outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic type I tympanoplasty. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane library Ovid, Scopus, Google scholar, and ClinicalTrials. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included comparative studies describing type I tympanoplasty, and comparing surgical outcomes of the endoscope with the microscope in terms of efficacy and safety. RESULTS: Our systematic search yielded 22 studies meeting the inclusion criteria and eligible for analysis. The pooled graft uptake rates and audiological results of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty demonstrated non-significant differences. In contrast, endoscopic type I tympanoplasty outperforms microscopic tympanoplasty regarding a highly significant decrease not only in pooled mean operative time but also in the pooled complications rate. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our meta-analysis, the surgical outcomes of endoscope-assisted and microscope-assisted type I tympanoplasty in terms of postoperative hearing outcomes and the graft uptake rate were comparable. On the contrary, operative time and complications rate proved to be significantly reduced with endoscopy compared to microscopy. Hence, the endoscope is as efficient as the microscope in type I tympanoplasty but less invasive, fewer in complications and shorter in operative time.

Outcomes of perichondrium graft covering the epithelium of the tympanic membrane for large-sized perforations: A 3-5-year follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the graft outcomes and iatrogenic cholesteatomas for 3 years following cartilage-perichondrium over-underlay technique with perichondrial graft covering the epithelium for large-sized tympanic membrane (TM) perforations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective case series enrolled patients with large-sized perforation who underwent endoscopic cartilage-perichondrium over-underlay technique. The graft success rate, hearing outcomes, and development of iatrogenic middle ear cholesteatomas and graft cholesteatomas were assessed at 3 years postoperatively. RESULTS: This study included 62 ears of 62 patients. The mean follow-up duration was 47.3 ± 10.8 (38-64) months. Neovascularization was observed in the lateral perichondrium graft in 55 (88.7 %) patients, which inosculated into the TM remnant at 4-5 weeks. However, graft neovascularization was not observed in the four patients with excessive perichondrium graft that migrated into the external auditory canal and the three patients with middle ear infections. The graft failure rate was 6.5 % at 6 months, 11.3 % at 12 months, 6.5 % at 24 months, and the overall graft success rate was 91.8 % at the last follow-up. Granular myringitis developed in 11.3 % (7/62) of the patients. High-resolution computed tomography revealed well-pneumatized mastoids and middle ear at the final follow-up. However, graft cholesteatomas were observed in 3 (4.8 %) patients at 7-24 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The cartilage-perichondrium over-underlay technique with perichondrial graft covering TM epithelium is safe and effective for the repair of large perforations, with good short- and long-term graft outcomes, minimal risk of graft cholesteatoma development, and no risk of iatrogenic middle ear cholesteatomas.

Comparison of temporalis fascia and cartilage graft over-under myringoplasty for repairing large perforations.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the operation time, graft success, audiometric outcomes and complications of over-under technique using a temporalis fascia (TMF) and cartilage grafts for the repair of large perforations. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 80 large perforations >2 quadrants of eardrum were prospectively randomized to undergo TMF over-under technique group (TFON, n = 40) or cartilage-perichondrium over-under technique group (CPON, n = 40). The graft success rate, audiometric outcomes, and complications were compared among two groups at 12 months. RESULTS: The mean operation time was 56.8 ± 4.2 (range:52-71) min in the TFON group and 37.9 ± 2.8 (range: 31-47) min in the CPON group (P < 0.001). The lost follow-up rate was 3 (7.5 %) patients in the TFON group and 2 (5.0 %) patient in the CPON group (P = 0.644). Finally, 37 patients in the TFON group and 38 patients in the CPON group were included in this study. The graft infection rate was 2 (5.4 %) patients in the TFON group and 2 (5.3 %) patient in the CPON group (P = 0.626), all the graft infection resulted in the residual perforation. The remaining residual perforation was 2 (5.4 %) patients in the TFON group and 1 (2.6 %) patient in the CPON group; the re-perforation was 3 (8.1 %) patients in the TFON group and 0 (0.0 %) patient in the CPON group. The graft success rate was 81.1 % (30/37) patients in the TFON group and 92.1 % (35/38) patient in the CPON group. The mean preoperative and 12-month postoperative ABGs were significantly different in any group (P < 0.01). However, there were no significant difference among two groups regardless of pre-or post-ABGs or ABG closure. No lateralization of the graft or blunting was noted in any group. Four (10.8 %)patients developed atelectasis and one (2.7 %) developed the EAC scarring in the TFON group. Graft cholesteatomas was found in 2 (5.4 %) patients in the TFON group and in 5 (13.2 %) patients in the CPON group (P = 0.449). Three (8.1 %) patients had temporary hypogeusia in the TFON group. CONCLUSION: Although temporalis fascia graft over-under technique obtained similar graft success rates and hearing outcomes for large chronic perforations to the cartilage-perichondrium over-under technique, temporalis fascia graft technique prolonged the operation time and increased the re-perforation and graft atelectasis. Nevertheless, the graft cholesteatomas were comparable among two techniques.

A comparative study of endoscopic myringoplasty versus microscopic myringoplasty at tertiary care center.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Myringoplasty is a surgical procedure performed to repair tympanic membrane perforation which can be performed either using a microscope or an endoscope. The aim of this study is to compare the graft uptake, hearing outcome and operative time of endoscopic myringoplasty (EM) versus microscopic myringoplasty (MM) by underlay cartilage island graft technique. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this prospective comparative study of sixty patients divided into two equal groups with small to medium sized tympanic membrane perforation were included. Tragal cartilage was used as graft material. Both the groups underwent myringoplasty by underlay cartilage island graft using endoscope (n = 30) and microscope (n = 30). The study was conducted between February 2022 to May 2023 after taking ethical approval from IRC of Nepalese Army Institute of Health Sciences. All patients were followed up on 7th postoperative day (POD), 1 and 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Graft uptake in was 90 % (27/30) in MM group and 93.33 % (28/30) in EM group. Mean operating time was more in MM group (66.46 ± 6.78min) than EM group (64.53 ± 6.6 min). The improvement in Air Bone Gap (ABG) was better in EM group (12.46 ± 6.58 dB) compared to MM group (10.9 ± 9.01 dB). The differences in graft uptake, operating time and improvement in ABG were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The study concludes that it does not matter which approach is used, good results are predictable and choice of the tool used is up to the individual surgeon.

Role of topical antibiotic ointment in the lateral graft following underlay myringoplasty: a prospective randomised study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the graft outcome and postoperative infection of with and without the use of antibiotic ointment following myringoplasty for the treatment of chronic perforations. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 135 chronic perforations were prospectively randomized to use of antibiotic ointment group (UAO, n = 68) or no use of antibiotic ointment group (NAO, n = 67) following myringoplasty. The graft outcomes and postoperative infection were compared among two groups at 6 months. RESULTS: At postoperative 6 months, the graft infection rate was 4.4% in the UAO group and 10.4% in the NAO group, the difference was not significant (P = 0.312).The graft success rates were 92.6% in the UAO group and 91.0% in the NAO group, the difference was not significant (P = 0.979). In the UAO group, 3 patients with purulence ear discharge resulted in a residual perforation although they received ofloxacin ear drops and intravenous antibiotic therapy treatment. In the NAO group, 6 patients with purulence ear discharge resulted in a residual perforation, only one, with mild purulence discharge was successfully treated and closed. In addition, no significant between-group differences were observed pre- (P = 0.746) or post- (P = 0.521) operative air bone gap (ABG) values or mean ABG gain (P = 0.745). However, granular myringitis with minimal moistness but without infection has been noted in 3 (4.4%) patients in the UAO group and in 5 (7.5%) in the NAO group, the difference was not significant (P = 0.699). CONCLUSIONS: Use and non-use of antibiotic ointments for lateral packing of graft are both comparable methods following myringoplasty for postoperative infection and graft outcomes.

Inside-out raising mucosal-tympanomeatal flap approach for the repair of large marginal perforations.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the graft success rate and hearing outcomes of the inside-out raising mucosal-tympanomeatal flap technique for the repair of large marginal perforations. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study enrolled patients with large marginal perforations who underwent endoscopic cartilage myringoplasty with the inside-out raising mucosal-tympanomeatal flap technique. The graft success rate, hearing outcomes, and complications were evaluated at 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: In total, 48 patients with large marginal perforations were included. 81% of the population had large perforation, 14.6 had subtotal and total perforation was seen in 4.2%. The mean operation time was 38.6 ±â€…7.1 min. At 12 months postoperatively, the graft success rate was 89.6% (43/48). The mean air-bone gap was 25.6 ± 5.2 dB preoperatively and 16.5 ± 4.1 dB at 12 months postoperatively, with significant differences between these values (p = 0.001). The functional success rate was 85.4% (41/48). None of the patients experienced worsened sensorineural hearing loss or graft-related complications, such as graft lateralization, significant blunting, and graft medialization, during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic cartilage-perichondrium myringoplasty for the repair of large marginal perforations using the inside-out raising mucosal-tympanomeatal flap technique was associated with satisfactory graft outcomes and minimal complications.