Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.943
Filtrar
1.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 23(1): 246, 2024 Jul 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38987782

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study quantifies the longitudinal economic burden for a wide spectrum of incident complications, metabolic syndrome (MS)-related risk factors, and comorbidities in patients with MS. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized linked data from the 2013 National Health Interview Survey and the 2012-2021 National Health Insurance Research Database to identify MS individuals and their characteristics. The incidence rate of each complication was calculated as the number of complication events in the study period divided by the total person-years during follow-up. The healthcare costs of complications were analyzed using a generalized estimating equation model to determine the cost impact of complications after adjustment for patients' characteristics. Sensitivity analyses on variables with high missing rates (i.e., cause of death, body mass index) were performed. RESULTS: Among 837 identified MS individuals over 8.28 (± 1.35) years of follow-up, the most frequent complications were microvascular diseases (incidence rate for nephropathy/retinopathy/neuropathy: 6.49/2.64/2.08 events per 100 person-years), followed by cardiovascular diseases (2.47), peripheral vascular diseases (2.01), and cancers (1.53). Death was the costliest event (event-year cost per person: USD 16,429) and cancers were the most expensive complications (USD 9,127-11,083 for non-MS- and MS-related cancers). Developing non-MS/MS-related cancers, cardiovascular diseases, and obesity-related medical conditions increased annual costs by 273% (95% CI: 181-397%)/175% (105-269%), 159% (118-207%), and 140% (84-214%), respectively. Microvascular diseases had the lowest cost impact on annual costs (i.e., 27% [17-39%]/27% [11-46%]/24% [11-37%] increases for nephropathy/neuropathy/retinopathy, respectively). Having existing comorbidities increased annual costs by 20% (osteoarthritis) to 108% (depression). Having morbid obesity (i.e., body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m2) increased annual costs by 58% (30-91%). CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden from costly incident complications (i.e., cardiovascular diseases, peripheral vascular diseases, cancers), MS-related risk factors (i.e., morbid obesity), and comorbidities (i.e., depression) highlight the urgent need for early intervention to prevent MS and its progression. The comprehensive cost estimates reported in this study can facilitate the parameterization of economic analyses to identify cost-effective interventions for these patients.


Assuntos
Comorbidade , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Bases de Dados Factuais , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Síndrome Metabólica , Humanos , Síndrome Metabólica/economia , Síndrome Metabólica/epidemiologia , Síndrome Metabólica/mortalidade , Incidência , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Fatores de Tempo , Estudos Longitudinais , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco Cardiometabólico , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/economia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico
2.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 10: e2300397, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39052946

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The rising cost of cancer treatment causes out-of-pocket spending among patients or caregivers in lower-middle-income countries, resulting in acute misery and insolvency. This study aimed to assess the financial toxicity associated with cancer treatment and the coping strategies for cancer treatment adopted among the caregivers of patients with cancer in a tertiary cancer care center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted among the primary caregivers of patients with cancer undergoing curative treatment from March to June 2023. The estimated sample size was 403 caregivers. The financial toxicity was assessed using a modified Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy tool, and coping strategies were explored using a validated questionnaire of 20 questions. Univariate and multivariate analyses investigated the associations and factors influencing financial toxicity. RESULTS: The caregivers recruited in the study were 403; 83.8% were younger than 50 years, and 66.5% were male. The common cancer types included were breast cancer (27.3%), GI cancer (17.9%), head and neck cancer (12.4%), and gynecological cancer (11.6%). The mean financial toxicity score was 22.32 (standard deviation, 9.55), with 64% experiencing moderate to severe financial toxicity. The most common coping strategies used were spending a portion or all of the savings, borrowing money from others, restructuring their spending habits, seeking financial assistance from the cancer center, and resorting to gold loans. CONCLUSION: Screening patients and their primary caregivers using a modified COST tool can help identify families experiencing severe financial toxicity and provide necessary intervention.


Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , Cuidadores , Neoplasias , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Neoplasias/psicologia , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidadores/psicologia , Cuidadores/economia , Cuidadores/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Países em Desenvolvimento , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Idoso , Capacidades de Enfrentamento
3.
J Med Econ ; 27(sup2): 30-40, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39010684

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The economic and mortality burden of cancer is high worldwide. In Europe, cancer was responsible for 1.3 million deaths in 2020 and incurred an estimated cost of €50 billion from premature mortality. Human papillomavirus (HPV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) are among the leading causes of infection-related cancers despite the availability of effective vaccines against these infections. This analysis estimated the mortality and productivity loss of HBV- and HPV-associated cancers that could be preventable through vaccination across European regions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institute for Health Metrics Evaluation (IHME) data were used to estimate mortality, years of life lost (YLL), and the value of years of life lost (VYLL) from five HBV- and HPV-related cancers (oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, cervical, and liver cancers) across 40 European countries in 2019. Preventable deaths and YLL were estimated based on fractions attributable to infections. Data from the World Bank on GDP per capita were used to estimate the VYLL. The robustness of these results was explored with sensitivity and scenario analyses. RESULTS: In 2019, 31,906 cancer deaths resulted in an economic burden of €18,521,614,725 due to productivity losses across Europe. HPV-related cervical cancer had the highest mortality (19,473 deaths) and economic burden (€10,706,253,185). HBV-related liver cancer and HPV-related larynx, oral cavity, and oropharynx cancers also had a substantial burden, particularly in males. Eastern Europe had the highest YLL (308,179; 39%) and Western Europe was responsible for the greatest VYLL (€8,281,306,504; 45%), although the highest VYLL per death was in Northern Europe (€923,638). HPV-related oropharynx cancer had the highest VYLL per death (€656,607). CONCLUSION: HPV- and HBV-related cancer deaths are associated with substantial mortality and productivity losses in Europe, which could be reduced by the continued prioritization and implementation of prophylactic public health measures including systematic awareness, vaccination, and screening efforts.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Humanos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Hepatite B/economia , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/economia , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/administração & dosagem , Modelos Econométricos , Adulto Jovem , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/economia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem
4.
Clin J Oncol Nurs ; 28(4): 428-431, 2024 Jul 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39041699

RESUMO

This article explores the relationships among cancer care, financial challenges, and mental health, emphasizing the growing significance of addressing these interconnected issues. Increased frequency of cancer diagnoses and i.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias/psicologia , Neoplasias/economia , Feminino , Masculino , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso
5.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 71(9): e31158, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38970222

RESUMO

Eligible pediatric hospitals can purchase clinician-administered drugs at discounted rates through the 340B Drug Pricing Program and charge payers prices exceeding drug acquisition costs, but the magnitude of these markups is not known. In a study of newly approved oncology drugs at pediatric 340B hospitals, median negotiated prices ranged from 102% (interquartile range [IQR]: 91%-156%) of average sales price (ASP) at Phoenix Children's Hospital to 630% (IQR: 526%-630%) at Driscoll Children's Hospital. Pediatric hospitals participating in the federal 340B Drug Pricing Program can extract steep payments on new drugs from commercial insurers, though with wide variation between and within hospitals.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Custos de Medicamentos , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Hospitais Pediátricos/economia , Antineoplásicos/economia , Criança , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/economia
6.
Cancer Med ; 13(13): e7461, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38970338

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid coverage for people with low income in the United States. Expanded insurance coverage could promote more timely access to cancer treatment, which could improve overall survival (OS), yet the long-term effects of Medicaid expansion (ME) remain unknown. We evaluated whether ME was associated with improved timely treatment initiation (TTI) and 3-year OS among patients with breast, cervical, colon, and lung cancers who were affected by the policy. METHODS: Medicaid-insured or uninsured patients aged 40-64 with stage I-III breast, cervical, colon, or non-small cell lung cancer within the National Cancer Database (NCDB). A difference-in-differences (DID) approach was used to compare changes in TTI (within 60 days) and 3-year OS between patients in ME states versus nonexpansion (NE) states before (2010-2013) and after (2015-2018) ME. Adjusted DID estimates for TTI and 3-year OS were calculated using multivariable linear regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models, respectively. RESULTS: ME was associated with a relative increase in TTI within 60 days for breast (DID = 4.6; p < 0.001), cervical (DID = 5.0 p = 0.013), and colon (DID = 4.0, p = 0.008), but not lung cancer (p = 0.505). In Cox regression analysis, ME was associated with improved 3-year OS for breast (DID hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82, p = 0.009), cervical (DID-HR = 0.81, p = 0.048), and lung (DID-HR = 0.87, p = 0.003). Changes in 3-year OS for colon cancer were not statistically different between ME and NE states (DID-HR, 0.77; p = 0.075). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that expanded insurance coverage can improve treatment and survival outcomes among low income and uninsured patients with cancer. As the debate surrounding ME continues nationwide, our findings serve as valuable insights to inform the development of policies aimed at fostering accessible and affordable healthcare for all.


Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro , Medicaid , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Neoplasias , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Feminino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Adulto , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
7.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 10: e2400043, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38959449

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The study aims to explore unmet social needs and sources of financial toxicities in patients as noted by health care professionals and researchers in cancer supportive care, shedding light on potential health disparities. METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey, we anonymously surveyed active members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC). The survey, structured in three sections, included questions regarding the routine assessment of social needs during patient consultations, sociodemographic aspects, factors influencing financial toxicity (FT), perceived support for managing FT, and available/desirable resources. RESULTS: A total of 218 MASCC members were included, predominantly from high-income countries (HIC, 73.4%), with many age 41-60 years (56.5%) and female (56.9%). Drug/treatment cost and insurance coverage were the main sources for FT among the HIC, whereas participants from low-middle-income countries (LMIC) considered transportation cost, loss of employment because of cancer diagnosis, and unavailability of return-to-work services as the top three sources of FT. Respondents from LMIC (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.01 [95% CI, 1.15 to 7.93]) and physicians (aOR, 2.67 [95% CI, 1.15 to 6.21]) were more likely to routinely assess financial coverages. Socioeconomic status was consistently ranked as one of the top three sources of financial toxicities by participants from LMIC (34%), HIC excluding the United States (38%), those who do not self-identify as racial/ethnic minority (36%), and physicians (40%). CONCLUSION: This global survey of health care professionals and researchers in HIC and LMIC revealed varying approaches to assessing financial coverage and social needs. Socioeconomic status emerged as a consistent concern across countries, affecting financial toxicities. The study highlights the need for tailored approaches and improved resource visibility while emphasizing clinicians' pivotal role in addressing financial aspects of cancer care.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/terapia , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Inquéritos e Questionários
8.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 864, 2024 Jul 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39026195

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Because the proportion of elderly individuals and the incidence of cancer worldwide are continually increasing, medical costs for elderly inpatients with cancer are being significantly increasing, which puts tremendous financial pressure on their families and society. The current study described the actual direct medical costs of elderly inpatients with cancer and analyzed the influencing factors for the costs to provide advice on the prevention and control of the high medical costs of elderly patients with cancer. METHOD: A retrospective descriptive analysis was performed on the hospitalization expense data of 11,399 elderly inpatients with cancer at a tier-3 hospital in Dalian between June 2016 and June 2020. The differences between different groups were analyzed using univariate analysis, and the influencing factors of hospitalization expenses were explored by multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The hospitalization cost of elderly cancer patients showed a decreasing trend from 2016 to 2020. Specifically, the top 3 hospitalization costs were material costs, drug costs and surgery costs, which accounted for greater than 10% of all cancers according to the classification: colorectal (23.96%), lung (21.74%), breast (12.34%) and stomach cancer (12.07%). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that cancer type, surgery, year and length of stay (LOS) had a common impact on the four types of hospitalization costs (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There were significant differences in the four types of hospitalization costs for elderly cancer patients according to the LOS, surgery, year and type of cancer. The study results suggest that the health administration department should enhance the supervision of hospital costs and elderly cancer patient treatment. Measures should be taken by relying on the hospital information system to strengthen the cost management of cancer diseases and departments, optimize the internal management system, shorten elderly cancer patients LOS, and reasonably control the costs of disease diagnosis, treatment and department operation to effectively reduce the economic burden of elderly cancer patients.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Neoplasias , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Feminino , Masculino , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/economia , China/epidemiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/economia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
Lancet Oncol ; 25(8): 979-988, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39004098

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Project Orbis is a global initiative that aims to streamline regulatory review processes across international regulators in the USA, Canada, Australia, UK, Israel, Brazil, Singapore, and Switzerland to bring promising cancer drugs to patients earlier. We explored the clinical benefit, time to regulatory approval and health technology assessment recommendations, reimbursement outcomes, and monthly treatment prices of cancer drugs reviewed through this initiative. METHODS: For this retrospective, comparative analysis, we identified cancer drug approvals reviewed through Project Orbis in the USA, Canada, and the UK between May 1, 2019, and Nov 1, 2023. Approvals of cancer drugs reviewed Project Orbis were extracted from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Oncology Centre of Excellence and all other FDA approvals from the Drugs@FDA database. The co-primary outcomes were time of regulatory review, time from regulatory approval to health technology assessment recommendation (England, Scotland, and Canada), reimbursement outcomes, clinical benefit (defined as median gains in progression-free survival and overall survival) between cancer drug approvals reviewed by Project Orbis and other FDA approval processes, and monthly treatment prices. The Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's Exact tests were used to examine statistical significance between approvals reviewed through Project Orbis and other FDA approvals during the same period. FINDINGS: Between May 1, 2019 and Nov 1, 2023, 81 (33%) of 244 cancer drugs approved by the FDA were reviewed through Project Orbis. The median overall survival gains were 4·1 months (IQR 3·3-5·1) compared with 2·7 months (2·1-3·9) for other FDA approvals. Similarly, progression-free survival gains were 2·6 months (IQR 1·7-4·9) for Project Orbis compared with 2·6 months (0·6-5·1) for other FDA approvals. Neither overall survival (p=0·11) nor progression-free survival (p=0·44) gains were significantly different between the two cohorts of approvals. Of the 14 UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) approvals reviewed by the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), the agency gave positive recommendations for all 14 (100%). Of the 15 MHRA approvals reviewed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the agency gave positive recommendations for six (40%). Of the 49 approvals reviewed by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), the agency conditionally recommended 44 (90%). The time between regulatory approval to NICE recommendation increased from a median of 137 days (IQR 102-172) in 2021 to 302 days (184-483) in 2023, SMC recommendation increased from 185 days (in 2021 for one drug only) to 368 days (IQR 313-476) in 2023, and CADTH decision increased from 97 days (in 2020 for one drug only) to 202 days (IQR 153-304) in 2023. The median monthly price of approvals reviewed through Project Orbis was US$20 000 per month (IQR 13 000-37 000). INTERPRETATION: Clinical outcomes of Project Orbis were no different than other FDA approvals during the same time, and access, after a successful health technology assessment, was considerably delayed or absent, raising questions about whether Project Orbis participation translates into faster patient access to medicines with high clinical benefit and sustainable costs. Although future challenges might benefit from regulatory harmonisation, the advantages are currently unclear. FUNDING: None.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Aprovação de Drogas , Custos de Medicamentos , Neoplasias , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica , United States Food and Drug Administration , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Antineoplásicos/economia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Canadá , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/economia , Escócia , Inglaterra , Análise Custo-Benefício
11.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr ; 2024(64): 55-61, 2024 Jun 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38924791

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Telehealth use increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and remains a complementary source of cancer care delivery. Understanding research funding trends in cancer-related telehealth can highlight developments in this area of science and identify future opportunities. METHODS: Applications funded by the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) between fiscal years 2016 and 2022 and focused on synchronous patient-provider telehealth were analyzed for grant characteristics (eg, funding mechanism), cancer focus (eg, cancer type), and study features (eg, type of telehealth service). Of 106 grants identified initially, 60 were retained for coding after applying exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Almost three-quarters (73%) of telehealth grants were funded during fiscal years 2020-2022. Approximately 67% were funded through R01 or R37 mechanism and implemented as randomized controlled trials (63%). Overall, telehealth grants commonly focused on treatment (30%) and survivorship (43%); breast cancer (12%), hematologic malignancies (10%), and multiple cancer sites (27%); and health disparity populations (ie, minorities, rural residents) (73%). Both audio and video telehealth were common (65%), as well as accompanying mHealth apps (20%). Telehealth services centered on psychosocial care, self-management, and supportive care (88%); interventions were commonly delivered by mental health professionals (30%). CONCLUSION: NCI has observed an increase in funded synchronous patient-provider telehealth grants. Trends indicate an evolution of awards that have expanded across the cancer control continuum, applied rigorous study designs, incorporated additional digital technologies, and focused on populations recognized for disparate cancer outcomes. As telehealth is integrated into routine cancer care delivery, additional research evidence will be needed to inform clinical practice.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Neoplasias , Telemedicina , Humanos , Telemedicina/economia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/economia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde/economia , SARS-CoV-2 , Organização do Financiamento/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
Cancer Med ; 13(11): e7366, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38872395

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic cancer experience high healthcare use and costs, most of which are unplanned. We aimed to assess whether patients with more competent informal caregivers have lower unplanned healthcare use and costs. METHODS: This study used data from a prospective cohort of patients with solid metastatic cancer. Patients and their informal family caregivers were surveyed every 3 months until patients' death. Patients' unplanned healthcare use/costs were examined through hospital records. Caregivers responded to the 4-item Caregiver Competence Scale. First, in a deceased subsample of patients and their caregivers, we used patients' last 2 years of data (226 dyads) to assess the association between caregivers' competency (independent variable) and patients' unplanned healthcare use/costs (outcomes). Next, in a prospective sample of patient-caregiver dyads (up to 15 surveys), we assessed whether patients' functional well-being and psychological distress moderated the association between caregivers' competency and unplanned healthcare use/costs (311 dyads). RESULTS: In the deceased subsample, during last 2 years of patients' life, caregivers' higher competency lowered the odds of patients' unplanned healthcare use [OR (CI) = 0.86 (0.75, 0.98), p = 0.03], and was associated with a significant reduction in unplanned healthcare costs [Coeff (CI) = -0.19 (-0.36, -0.01), p = 0.03]. In the prospective sample, patients' functional well-being and psychological distress moderated the association between caregivers' competency and patients' unplanned healthcare use/costs. CONCLUSION: With deterioration in patients' condition and an increase in caregiving demands, improving caregivers' competency can reduce patients' unplanned healthcare use and costs. This should be further tested in future trials.


Assuntos
Cuidadores , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Neoplasias , Humanos , Cuidadores/psicologia , Cuidadores/economia , Feminino , Masculino , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto
13.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 8(3)2024 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825338

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Industry payments to US cancer centers are poorly understood. METHODS: US National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated comprehensive cancer centers were identified (n = 51). Industry payments to NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers from 2014 to 2021 were obtained from Open Payments and National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant funding from NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT). Given our focus on cancer centers, we measured the subset of industry payments related to cancer drugs specifically and the subset of NIH funding from the NCI. RESULTS: Despite a pandemic-related decline in 2020-2021, cancer-related industry payments to NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers increased from $482 million in 2014 to $972 million in 2021. Over the same period, NCI research grant funding increased from $2 481  million to $2 724  million. The large majority of nonresearch payments were royalties and licensing payments. CONCLUSION: Industry payments to NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers increased substantially more than NCI funding in recent years but were also more variable. These trends raise concerns regarding the influence and instability of industry payments.


Assuntos
Institutos de Câncer , Indústria Farmacêutica , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto , Estados Unidos , Humanos , National Cancer Institute (U.S.)/economia , Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Indústria Farmacêutica/tendências , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/tendências , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto/economia , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/economia , Institutos de Câncer/economia , Conflito de Interesses/economia , Antineoplásicos/economia , Neoplasias/economia
14.
BMJ Open ; 14(6): e082025, 2024 Jun 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830736

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to estimate the indirect economic burden of 22 cancer types in Jordan using both the human capital approach (HCA) and the value of a statistical life year (VSLY) approach. Additionally, this study aims to forecast the burden of these cancers for the next 5 years while employing time series analysis. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study with a time series analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Disability adjusted life years records from the IHME Global Burden Disease estimates 2019 data. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Indirect economic burden of cancer in Jordan. RESULTS: The mean total economic burden for all cancers is estimated to be $1.82 billion using HCA and $3.13 billion using VSLY approach. The cancers contributing most to the total burden are 'tracheal, bronchus and lung cancer' ($359.5 million HCA, $618.3 million VSLY), followed by 'colon and rectum cancer' ($300.6 million HCA, $517.1 million VSLY) and 'breast cancer' ($292.4 million HCA, $502.9 million VSLY). The indirect economic burden ranged from 1.4% to 2.1% of the gross domestic product (GDP) using the HCA, and from 2.3% to 3.6% of the GDP using the VSLY approach. The indirect economic burden is expected to reach 2.3 and 3.5 billion Intl$ by the year 2025 using the HCA and VSLY approach, respectively. CONCLUSION: The indirect economic burden of cancer in Jordan amounted to 1.4%-3.6% of total GDP, with tracheal, bronchus and lung cancer; colon and rectum cancer; and breast cancer contributing to over 50% of the total burden. This will help set national cancer spending priorities following Jordan's economic modernisation vision with regard to maximising health economic outcomes.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Neoplasias , Humanos , Jordânia/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto
15.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2416359, 2024 Jun 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865128

RESUMO

Importance: Insurance barriers to cancer care can cause significant patient and clinician burden. Objective: To investigate the association of insurance denial with changes in technique, dose, and time to delivery of radiation oncology treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this single-institution cohort analysis, data were collected from patients with payer-denied authorization for radiation therapy (RT) from November 1, 2021, to December 8, 2022. Data were analyzed from December 15, 2022, to December 31, 2023. Exposure: Insurance denial for RT. Main Outcomes and Measures: Association of these denials with changes in RT technique, dose, and time to treatment delivery was assessed using χ2 tests. Results: A total of 206 cases (118 women [57.3%]; median age, 58 [range, 26-91] years) were identified. Most insurers (199 [96.6%]) were commercial payers, while 7 (3.4%) were Medicare or Medicare Advantage. One hundred sixty-one patients (78.2%) were younger than 65 years. Of 206 cases, 127 (61.7%) were ultimately authorized without any change to the requested RT technique or prescription dose; 56 (27.2%) were authorized after modification to RT technique and/or prescription dose required by the payer. Of 21 cases with required prescription dose change, the median decrease in dose was 24.0 (range, 2.3-51.0) Gy. Of 202 cases (98.1%) with RT delivered, 72 (34.9%) were delayed for a mean (SD) of 7.8 (9.1) days and median of 5 (range, 1-49) days. Four cases (1.9%) ultimately did not receive any authorization, with 3 (1.5%) not undergoing RT, and 1 (0.5%) seeking treatment at another institution. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with payer-denied cases, most insurance denials in radiation oncology were ultimately approved on appeal; however, RT technique and/or effectiveness may be compromised by payer-mandated changes. Further investigation and action to recognize the time and financial burdens on clinicians and clinical effects on patients caused by insurance denials of RT is needed.


Assuntos
Radioterapia (Especialidade) , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Idoso , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/economia , Estados Unidos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Neoplasias/economia , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Estudos de Coortes
16.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0306339, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38941304

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) has proven to be a reliable tool for quantifying the impact of financial toxicity (FT) in patients with cancer in clinical and public health settings. However, the COST has not yet been validated in Vietnam. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate its reliability and validity among Vietnamese patients with cancer. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a sample of 300 patients with cancer aged 27-95 years (mean: 58.5±11.2) in a tertiary hospital. The COST was translated into Vietnamese and English and adjusted to suit the local culture. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients. The construct and convergent validities were also assessed. RESULTS: The COST demonstrated good internal consistency and reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.913; McDonald's omega = 0.915). The exploratory factor analysis revealed two factors that explained 64.9% of the variance. The adjusted fit indices indicated a good fit of the model (χ2 (39) = 67.78, p = 0.003; standardized root mean squared residual = 0.042; Tucker-Lewis index = 0.971; comparative fit index = 0.979; root mean square error of approximation = 0.061, 90% confidence interval = 0.035-0084). Higher COST scores were significantly correlated with higher health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L utility score: r = 0.21, p = 0.002; EQ VAS: r = 0.28, p < 0.001). Multivariate quantile regression analysis revealed that female sex, rural residence, and unstable job/unemployment were associated with lower COST scores. There was no statistically significant difference in other factors, including clinical factors (types of cancer, staging, and treatment modalities). CONCLUSIONS: The COST is reliable and valid, making it suitable for assessing FT severity in Vietnamese patients with cancer.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Feminino , Vietnã , Idoso , Adulto , Neoplasias/economia , Estudos Transversais , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , População do Sudeste Asiático
17.
J Med Econ ; 27(sup2): 20-29, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38889319

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes several cancers such as cervical cancer and some head and neck (oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx), vulval, vaginal, anal, and penile cancers. As HPV vaccination is available, there is potential to prevent these cancers attributed to HPV and consequently the burden associated with them. The aim of this analysis was to estimate the number of HPV-related cancer deaths and the productivity costs due to years of life lost (YLL) in the United Kingdom (UK). METHOD: A model was developed utilizing UK 2019 mortality data sourced from country-specific databases for England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland for the following HPV-related cancers: head and neck (ICD-10 C00-14 and C32), cervix uteri (C53), vaginal (C51), vulval (C52), anal (C21), and penile (C60). The proportion of deaths and years of life lost (YLL) due to HPV were estimated using HPV attributable fractions for each anatomic location from the published literature. Labor force participation, retirement ages, and mean annual earnings, discounted at 3.5% annually, were applied to YLL to calculate the present value of future lost productivity (PVFLP). RESULTS: A total of 1817 deaths due to HPV-related cancers were reported in the UK in 2019 resulting in 31,804 YLL. Restricting to only YLL that occurred prior to retirement age yielded a total YPLL of 11,765 and a total PVFLP of £187,764,978. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high disease burden in the UK for HPV-related cancers, with a large economic impact on the wider economy due to productivity losses. Implementing and reinforcing public health measures to maintain high HPV vaccination coverage in both males and females may further facilitate reduction of this burden.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Humanos , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/economia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Eficiência , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Modelos Econométricos , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/economia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/economia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Papillomavirus Humano
18.
BMJ Open ; 14(6): e081425, 2024 Jun 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38925706

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Over 50% of people affected by cancer report unmet support needs. To address unmet information and psychological needs, non-government organisations such as Cancer Councils (Australia) have developed state-based telephone cancer information and support services. Due to competing demands, evidence of the value of these services is needed to ensure that future investment makes the best use of scarce resources. This research aims to determine the costs and broader economic and social value of a telephone support service, to inform future funding and service provision. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A codesigned, evaluative social return on investment analysis (SROI) will be conducted to estimate and compare the costs and monetised benefits of Cancer Council Victoria's (CCV) telephone support line, 13 11 20, over 1-year and 3-year benefit periods. Nine studies will empirically estimate the parameters to inform the SROI and calculate the ratio (economic and social value to value invested): step 1 mapping outcomes (in-depth analysis of CCV's 13 11 20 recorded call data; focus groups and interviews); step 2 providing evidence of outcomes (comparative survey of people affected by cancer who do and do not call CCV's 13 11 20; general public survey); step 3 valuing the outcomes (financial proxies, value games); step 4 establishing the impact (Delphi); step 5 calculating the net benefit and step 6 service improvement (discrete choice experiment (DCE), 'what if' analysis). Qualitative (focus groups, interviews) and quantitative studies (natural language processing, cross-sectional studies, Delphi) and economic techniques (willingness-to-pay, financial proxies, value games, DCE) will be applied. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for each of the studies will be sought independently as the project progresses. So far, ethics approval has been granted for the first two studies. As each study analysis is completed, results will be disseminated through presentation, conferences, publications and reports to the partner organisations.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/economia , Austrália , Telefone , Projetos de Pesquisa , Apoio Social
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...