ß-glucan: a potent adjuvant in immunotherapy for digestive tract tumors.

The immunotherapy for gastrointestinal tumors, as a significant research direction in the field of oncology treatment in recent years, has garnered extensive attention due to its potential therapeutic efficacy and promising clinical application prospects. Recent advances in immunotherapy notwithstanding, challenges persist, such as side effects, the complexity of the tumor immune microenvironment, variable patient responses, and drug resistance. Consequently, there is a pressing need to explore novel adjunctive therapeutic modalities. ß-glucan, an immunomodulatory agent, has exhibited promising anti-tumor efficacy in preclinical studies involving colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and gastric cancer, while also mitigating the adverse reactions associated with chemotherapy and enhancing patients' quality of life. However, further clinical and fundamental research is warranted to comprehensively evaluate its therapeutic potential and underlying biological mechanisms. In the future, ß-glucan holds promise as an adjunctive treatment for gastrointestinal tumors, potentially bringing significant benefits to patients.

Palliative care case management in a surgical department for patients with gastrointestinal cancer-a register-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of generalist palliative care interventions in hospitals is unknown. AIM: This study aimed to explore the impact of a palliative care case management intervention for patients with gastrointestinal cancer (PalMaGiC) on hospital admissions, healthcare use, and place of death. DESIGN: This was a register-based cohort study analyzing data from the Danish Register on Causes of Death, the Danish National Patient Register, and the Danish Palliative Database. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Deceased patients with gastrointestinal cancer from 2010 to 2020 exposed to PalMaGiC were compared over three periods of time to patients receiving standard care. RESULTS: A total of 43,969 patients with gastrointestinal cancers were included in the study, of whom 1518 were exposed to PalMaGiC. In the last 30 days of life, exposed patients were significantly more likely to be hospitalized (OR of 1.62 (95% CI 1.26-2.01)), spend more days at the hospital, estimate of 1.21 (95% CI 1.02-1.44), and have a higher number of hospital admissions (RR of 1.13 (95% CI 1.01-1.27)), and were more likely to die at the hospital (OR of 1.94 (95% CI 1.55-2.44)) with an increasing trend over time. No differences were found for hospital healthcare use. CONCLUSION: Patients exposed to the PalMaGiC intervention had a greater likelihood of hospitalizations and death at the hospital compared to unexposed patients, despite the opposite intention. Sensitivity analyses show that regional differences may hold some of the explanation for this. Future development of generalist palliative care in hospitals should focus on integrating a home-based approach, community care, and PC physician involvement.

Immune checkpoint reprogramming via sequential nucleic acid delivery strategy optimizes systemic immune responses for gastrointestinal cancer immunotherapy.

Monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoints have been widely applied in gastrointestinal cancer immunotherapy. However, systemic administration of various monoclonal antibodies does not often result in sustained effects in reversing the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), which may be due to the spatiotemporal dynamic changes of immune checkpoints. Herein, we reported a novel immune checkpoint reprogramming strategy for gastrointestinal cancer immunotherapy. It was achieved by the sequential delivery of siPD-L1 (siRNA for programmed cell death ligand 1) and pOX40L (plasmid for OX40 ligand), which were complexed with two cationic polymer brush-grafted carbon nanotubes (dense short (DS) and dense long (DL)) designed based on the structural characteristics of nucleic acids and brush architectures. Upon administrating DL/pOX40L for the first three dosages, then followed by DS/siPD-L1 for the next three dosages to the TME, it upregulated the stimulatory checkpoint OX40L on dendritic cells (DCs) and downregulated inhibitory checkpoint PD-L1 on tumor cells and DCs in a sequential reprogramming manner. Compared with other combination treatments, this sequential strategy drastically boosted the DCs maturation, and CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes infiltration in tumor site. Furthermore, it could augment the local antitumor response and improve the T cell infiltration in tumor-draining lymph nodes to reverse the peripheral immunosuppression. Our study demonstrated that sequential nucleic acid delivery strategy via personalized nanoplatforms effectively reversed the immunosuppression status in both tumor microenvironment and peripheral immune landscape, which significantly enhanced the systemic antitumor immune responses and established an optimal immunotherapy strategy against gastrointestinal cancer.

Recent developments in immunotherapy for gastrointestinal tract cancers.

The past few decades have witnessed the rise of immunotherapy for Gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancers. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and PD ligand-1 antibodies, has become increasingly pivotal in the treatment of advanced and perioperative GI tract cancers. Currently, anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy is considered as first-line regimen for unselected advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEJC), mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC), and advanced esophageal cancer (EC). In addition, the encouraging performance of claudin18.2-redirected chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in later-line GI tract cancers brings new hope for cell therapy in solid tumour treatment. Nevertheless, immunotherapy for GI tumour remains yet precise, and researchers are dedicated to further maximising and optimising the efficacy. This review summarises the important research, latest progress, and future directions of immunotherapy for GI tract cancers including EC, G/GEJC, and CRC.

A novel artificial intelligence network to assess the prognosis of gastrointestinal cancer to immunotherapy based on genetic mutation features.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized gastrointestinal cancer treatment, yet the absence of reliable biomarkers hampers precise patient response prediction. Methods: We developed and validated a genomic mutation signature (GMS) employing a novel artificial intelligence network to forecast the prognosis of gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing ICIs therapy. Subsequently, we explored the underlying immune landscapes across different subtypes using multiomics data. Finally, UMI-77 was pinpointed through the analysis of drug sensitization data from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database. The sensitivity of UMI-77 to the AGS and MKN45 cell lines was evaluated using the cell counting kit-8 (CCK8) assay and the plate clone formation assay. Results: Using the artificial intelligence network, we developed the GMS that independently predicts the prognosis of gastrointestinal cancer patients. The GMS demonstrated consistent performance across three public cohorts and exhibited high sensitivity and specificity for 6, 12, and 24-month overall survival (OS) in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. It outperformed conventional clinical and molecular features. Low-risk samples showed a higher presence of cytolytic immune cells and enhanced immunogenic potential compared to high-risk samples. Additionally, we identified the small molecule compound UMI-77. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of UMI-77 was inversely related to the GMS. Notably, the AGS cell line, classified as high-risk, displayed greater sensitivity to UMI-77, whereas the MKN45 cell line, classified as low-risk, showed less sensitivity. Conclusion: The GMS developed here can reliably predict survival benefit for gastrointestinal cancer patients on ICIs therapy.

Impact and potential value of immunosenescence on solid gastrointestinal tumors.

Solid gastrointestinal tumors often respond poorly to immunotherapy for the complex tumor microenvironment (TME), which is exacerbated by immune system alterations. Immunosenescence is the process of increased diversification of immune genes due to aging and other factors, leading to a decrease in the recognition function of the immune system. This process involves immune organs, immune cells, and the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). The most fundamental change is DNA damage, resulting in TME remodeling. The main manifestations are worsening inflammation, increased immunosuppressive SASP production, decreased immune cell antitumor activity, and the accumulation of tumor-associated fibroblasts and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, making antitumor therapy less effective. Senotherapy strategies to remove senescent cells and block key senescence processes can have synergistic effects with other treatments. This review focuses on immunoenescence and its impact on the solid TME. We characterize the immunosenescent TME and discuss future directions for antitumor therapies targeting senescence.

Water-filtered infrared A radiation hyperthermia combined with immunotherapy for advanced gastrointestinal tumours.

This study pioneered the use of WIRA whole-body infrared hyperthermia combined with ICI therapy to treat GIT and verified the feasibility and safety of HIT. The final results showed a DCR of 55.6%, with a median PFS of 53.5 days, median OS of 134 days, and an irAE incidence of 22.2%. Therefore, we believe that HIT can exert multiple synergistic sensitisation effects, thereby providing clinical benefits to patients with advanced GITs, increasing overall safety, and improving patients' QOL.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to validate the effectiveness, safety and feasibility of water­filtered infrared A radiation (WIRA) whole­body hyperthermia combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy (HIT) and evaluate the real­world clinical application prospects. METHODS: This open­label single­arm phase 2 clinical trial (NCT06022692) aimed to enrol advanced gastrointestinal tumour (GIT) patients with the MSS/pMMR phenotype. The patients were treated with whole­body hyperthermia on Days 1 and 8 of each HIT cycle along with administration of tislelizumab on Day 2. RESULTS: Between 1 June 2020 and 31 May 2022, 18 patients were enrolled in the study, including those with gastric cancer (n = 6), colon cancer (n = 7), rectal cancer (n = 3) and appendiceal cancer (n = 2). As of 19 May 2023, 17 of the 18 patients had died, including 14 deaths caused by tumour progression and three deaths caused by diseases other than cancer, while one patient was still undergoing follow­up. In terms of efficacy, the median DCR was 55.6%, while the median PFS and OS were 53.5 days and 134 days, respectively. Four patients (22.2%) experienced immune­related adverse events, and none of the patients reported grade 3 or higher irAEs. Hyperthermia was followed by an increase in the number of tumour immune­activated cells. CONCLUSIONS: HIT can provide survival benefits in patients with GITs by activating antitumour immune function and shows good safety and feasibility.

Quality of life for patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer randomised to early specialised home-based palliative care: the ALLAN trial.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of specialised palliative care (SPC) is to improve the quality of life (QoL) for patients with a high symptom burden from a life-threatening disease. This randomised study aimed to assess the QoL impact of early integration of SPC alongside tumour-specific palliative treatment in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. METHODS: We randomly assigned ambulatory patients with advanced GI cancer to early integration of SPC and palliative tumour-specific treatment or tumour-specific treatment alone. The primary endpoint was QoL assessed at baseline and every sixth week using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were randomised. The difference in total FACT-G score between patients assigned to early integration with SPC and controls was 5.2 points (95% CI: -0.1 to 10.5, p = 0.216), 6.7 points (95% CI: 0.2 to 13.3, p = 0.172), and 13 points (95% CI: 5.7 to 20.2, p = 0.004) at weeks 6, 12, and 24, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective randomised trial strengthens the argument for early integration of SPC with tumour-specific treatment in patients with advanced GI cancers. We found an improved QoL for patients with advanced GI cancer 24 weeks after randomisation to early integration of home-based SPC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (ref: NCT02246725).

Host-Gut Microbiota Metabolic Interactions and Their Role in Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancers.

The critical role of the gut microbiome in gastrointestinal cancers is becoming increasingly clear. Imbalances in the gut microbial community, referred to as dysbiosis, are linked to increased risks for various forms of gastrointestinal cancers. Pathogens like Fusobacterium and Helicobacter pylori relate to the onset of esophageal and gastric cancers, respectively, while microbes such as Porphyromonas gingivalis and Clostridium species have been associated with a higher risk of pancreatic cancer. In colorectal cancer, bacteria such as Fusobacterium nucleatum are known to stimulate the growth of tumor cells and trigger cancer-promoting pathways. On the other hand, beneficial microbes like Bifidobacteria offer a protective effect, potentially inhibiting the development of gastrointestinal cancers. The potential for therapeutic interventions that manipulate the gut microbiome is substantial, including strategies to engineer anti-tumor metabolites and employ microbiota-based treatments. Despite the progress in understanding the influence of the microbiome on gastrointestinal cancers, significant challenges remain in identifying and understanding the precise contributions of specific microbial species and their metabolic products. This knowledge is essential for leveraging the role of the gut microbiome in the development of precise diagnostics and targeted therapies for gastrointestinal cancers.

[Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: update 2024]. / Gastrointestinale neuroendokrine Tumoren ­ Update 2024.

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are rare and clinically heterogeneous. From a diagnostic perspective, well-differentiated tumours must be distinguished from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. The disease may be associated with autonomous hormone secretion by the tumour, and the resulting syndromes are often associated with reduced survival. Somatostatin analogues form the backbone of antiproliferative and antisecretory treatment alongside local ablative procedures. In pancreatic NET, prospective studies confirm the value of specific chemotherapy, particularly in terms of higher remission rates. New tyrosine kinase inhibitors are an option for patients that have failed to respond to standard treatments. Inhibition of HIF2-alpha is an emerging effective treatment option for patients with von Hippel-Lindau-syndrome associated tumours, e.g. pancreatic NET. Radioligand therapy is an established second-line option for advanced NET of the small intestine, and recent study results support its use in pancreatic NET in earlier-line treatment. Due to the complexity of the disease, management of NET patients should be performed in close collaboration with a specialized multidisciplinary team.

Patient and Provider Attitudes and Preferences Regarding Early Palliative Care Delivery for Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Prospective Survey.

Early integrated palliative care (EIPC) for patients with advanced cancers requires the involvement of family doctors (FDs) and oncologists. We compared attitudes between patients and their providers regarding the delivery of EIPC. Patients with newly diagnosed incurable gastrointestinal (GI) cancer at a tertiary cancer centre in Ontario, Canada, were surveyed using a study-specific instrument regarding the importance of and preferences for accessing support across eight domains of palliative care. Physicians within the circle of care completed a parallel survey for each patient. The concordance between patient and physician responses was analyzed. A total of 66 patients were surveyed (median age 69, 35% female). All had an oncologist, 12% had a specialist palliative care provider (SPC), and 97% had an FD, but only 41% listed the FD as part of the care team. In total, 95 providers responded (oncologist = 68, FD = 21, SPC = 6; response rate 92%; 1-3 physician responses per patient). Disease management and physical concerns were most important to patients. Patients preferred to access care in these domains from oncologists or SPCs. For all other domains, most patients attributed primary responsibility to self or family rather than any healthcare provider. Thus, concordance was poor between patient and physician responses. Across most domains of palliative care, we found low agreement between cancer patients and their physicians regarding responsibilities for care, with FDs appearing to have limited involvement at this stage.

Patterns of acute hospital and specialist palliative care use among people with non-curative upper gastrointestinal cancer.

PURPOSE: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers contribute to 16.7% of UK cancer deaths. These patients make high use of acute hospital services, but detail about palliative care use is lacking. We aimed to determine the patterns of use of acute hospital and hospital specialist palliative care services in patients with advanced non-curative upper GI cancer. METHODS: We conducted a service evaluation of hospital use and palliative care for all patients with non-curative upper GI cancer seen in one large hospital, using routinely collected data (2019-2022). We report and characterise hospital admissions and palliative care within the study time period, using descriptive statistics, and multivariable Poisson regression to estimate the unadjusted and adjusted incidence rate ratio of hospital admissions. RESULTS: The total with non-curative upper GI cancer was 960. 86.7% had at least one hospital admission, with 1239 admissions in total. Patients had a higher risk of admission to hospital if: aged ≤ 65 (IRR for 66-75 years 0.71, IRR 76-85 years 0.68; IRR > 85 years 0.53; p < 0.05), or lived in an area of lower socioeconomic status (IMD Deciles 1-5) (IRR 0.90; p < 0.05). Over the 4-year period, the rate of re-admission was higher in patients not referred to palliative care (rate 0.52 readmissions/patient versus rate 1.47 readmissions/patient). CONCLUSION: People with advanced non-curative gastrointestinal cancer have frequent hospital admissions, especially if younger or from areas of lower socioeconomic status. There is clear association between specialist palliative care referral and reduced risk of hospitalisation. This evidence supports referral to specialist palliative care.

Glycolysis in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a brief overview.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most prevalent mesenchymal tumor of the digestive tract. Its growth is primarily influenced by mutations in KIT or PDGFRA. Surgery is the primary treatment option for GIST; however, KIT inhibitors, such as imatinib, are used for inoperable cases. Resistance to imatinib is an upcoming challenge, especially because the effectiveness of alternative drugs is limited. Enhancement of the glycolysis pathway in cancer cells has been identified as a key feature in cancer. This unique metabolic activity has implications on tumor growth, prognosis, and resistance to therapy, even in GIST. Members of the glucose transporter (GLUT) family (particularly GLUT-1) play a significant role in GIST progression and response to treatment. Diagnostic imaging using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, which enables visualization of glucose metabolism, can aid in GIST diagnosis and risk assessment. The interplay between glycolysis and GIST can lead to the development of various therapeutic strategies, especially those involving glycolysis-related molecules, such as hexokinase and lactate dehydrogenase. However, further research is required to understand the full spectrum of glycolysis in GIST and its therapeutic potential. Herein, we present an exhaustive overview and analysis of the role of glycolysis in GIST, especially as a therapeutic target.

[Management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors]. / Prise en charge des tumeurs stromales gastro-intestinales.

MANAGEMENT OF GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMORS. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most frequent sarcoma subtype. More than 80% of GIST are characterized by activating mutations in KIT or PDGFRA genes, but rare molecular subtypes exist. Localized GIST can be cured by surgery. Adjuvant treatment with imatinib is the gold standard in high-risk GIST presenting mutations sensitive to this tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting KIT and PDGFRA has revolutionized the prognosis of metastatic GIST, by increasing the median overall survival: from less than 18 months to more than 70 months within 20 years. Similary to other histological subtypes, the diagnostic and therapeutic management of GIST must be referred to sarcoma reference centers.

PRISE EN CHARGE DES TUMEURS STROMALES GASTRO-INTESTINALES. Les tumeurs stromales gastro-intestinales (GIST) représentent le sous-type de sarcomes le plus fréquent. Plus de 80 % des GIST sont caractérisées par des mutations activatrices des gènes KIT ou PDGFRA, mais des soustypes moléculaires plus rares existent. Au stade localisé, les GIST sont des maladies curables par exérèse chirurgicale. Le traitement adjuvant par imatinib est un standard thérapeutique dans les GIST associées à un haut risque de récidive et présentant des mutations sensibles au traitement. Au stade métastatique, le développement des inhibiteurs de tyrosine kinase ciblant KIT et PDGFRA a bouleversé la prise en charge et le pronostic des patients, en augmentant la survie globale : de moins de dix-huit mois il y a une vingtaine d'années à plus de soixante-dix mois aujourd'hui. Comme pour les autres sous-types histologiques, la prise en charge diagnostique et thérapeutique des GIST doit être réalisée dans des centres experts pour la prise en charge des sarcomes.

[Gastrointestinal mucosa-associated lymphoma]. / Mukosaassoziierte Lymphome des Gastrointestinaltrakts.

Mucosa-associated lymphomas of the gastrointestinal tract are a heterogeneous group differing in pathogenesis, localization and therapeutic options. For all of them, differentiated treatment requires an exact determination of lymphoma stage. For gastric MALT lymphoma, the pathogenetic role of Helicobacter pylori infection has become evident in the last 30 years. These insights were consequently implemented into clinical practice. Nowadays, Helicobacter pylori eradication is the treatment of choice for gastric MALT lymphoma, leading to complete remission of the lymphoma in the majority of cases. In the absence of success, radiotherapy is available in localized stages I/II E with excellent results. Immuno-chemotherapy is the domain for advanced stages III/IV E, and surgery plays no role any more. The rare intestinal and colorectal MALT lymphomas require an individualized therapeutic approach.

The TEOGIC study project: a comprehensive characterization of early onset gastrointestinal cancer in the Northern area of Spain.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal cancers represent one of the most prevalent diseases worldwide. Strikingly, the incidence of Early Onset Gastrointestinal Cancer (EOGIC) has been rising during the last decades and changes in lifestyle and environmental exposure seem to play a role. EOGIC has been defined as a different entity compared to on-average gastrointestinal cancer, with distinct clinical and molecular characteristics. Inherent to the particularities of younger age, there is an unmet need for a tailored approach for the management of these patients. The TEOGIC proposes a comprehensive study to characterize EOGIC patients in the northern of Spain. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed new diagnosis of colorectal, gastroesophageal and pancreatic adenocarcinoma will be considered for two cohorts: EOGIC (≤ 50 years old) and non-EOGIC (60-75 years old), with a ratio of 1:2. Two hundred and forty patients will be recruited in 4 Public Hospitals from northern Spain. After receiving unified informed consent, demographic and clinical data of the patients will be collected in a REDCap database. Lifestyle related data will be obtained in questionnaires assessing diet, physical activity and the general quality of life of the patients before diagnosis. Biological samples prior to any onco-specific treatment will be obtained for the analyses of circulating inflammatory proteins, gut microbiota, and the proteome of the tumor microenvironment. Histologic characteristics and routine biomarkers will be also collected. Thereafter, data will be integrated and analyzed to assess tumor specific, pan-tumor and sex-associated differential characteristics of EOGIC. DISCUSSION: The underlying risk factors and differential characteristics of EOGIC remain poorly studied, particularly in our geographical area. Although limited by the exploratory nature and the small sample size estimated to be recruited, TEOGIC represents the first attempt to comprehensively characterize these young patients, and thus attend to their special needs. Findings derived from this study could contribute to raise awareness and preventive behaviors in the population. In parallel, molecular studies could lead to the identification of potential novel non-invasive biomarkers and therapeutic targets that would help in the development of the tailored clinical management of these patients, focusing on screening programs for early diagnosis and precision medicine.

Safety and Effectiveness of Irreversible Electroporation in Lymph Node Metastases.

PURPOSE: Demonstrating the safety and efficacy of percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) for the treatment of lymph node metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An IRB-approved, single-center retrospective review was performed on patients with lymph node metastases gastrointestinal, and genitourinary primary cancers. Primary objective safety was evaluated by assessing complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification, and efficacy was determined by tumor response on follow-up imaging and local progression-free survival (LPFS). Secondary outcome measures were technical success (complete ablation with an adequate ablative margin > 5 mm), length of hospital stay and distant progression-free survival (DPFS). RESULTS: Nineteen patients underwent percutaneous IRE between June 2018 and February 2023 for lymph node metastases, close to critical structures, such as vasculature, bowel, or nerves. The technical success was achieved in all cases. Complications occurred in four patients (21.1%), including two self-limiting grade 1 hematomas, a grade 1 abdominal pain, and grade 2 nerve pain treated with medication. Seventeen patients were hospitalized overnight, one patient stayed two nights and another patient stayed fourteen nights. Median follow-up was 25.5 months. Median time to local progression was 24.1 months (95% CI: 0-52.8) with 1-, 2-, and 5-year LPFS of 57.9%, 57.9% and 20.7%, respectively. Median time to distant progression was 4.3 months (95% CI: 0.3-8.3) with 1-, 2-, and 5-year DPFS of 31.6%, 13.2% and 13.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: IRE is a safe and effective minimally-invasive treatment for lymph node metastases in locations, where temperature dependent ablation may be contraindicated. Care should be taken when employing IRE near nerves.