Impact of multidrug resistance on outcomes in hematologic cancer patients with bacterial bloodstream infections.

Despite the improved outcomes in patients with hematological malignancies, infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) pose a new threat to these patients. We retrospectively reviewed the patients with hematological cancer and bacterial bloodstream infections (BSIs) at a tertiary hospital between 2003 and 2022 to assess the impact of MDROs on outcomes. Among 328 BSIs, 81 (24.7%) were caused by MDROs. MDRO rates increased from 10.3% (2003-2007) to 39.7% (2018-2022) (P < 0.001). The 30-day mortality rate was 25.0%, which was significantly higher in MDRO-infected patients than in non-MDRO-infected patients (48.1 vs. 17.4%; P < 0.001). The observed trend was more pronounced in patients with newly diagnosed diseases and relapsed/refractory disease but less prominent in patients in complete remission. Among MDROs, carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria exhibited the highest mortality, followed by vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Multivariate analysis identified independent risk factors for 30-day mortality as age ≥ 65 years, newly diagnosed disease, relapsed/refractory disease, MDROs, polymicrobial infection, CRP ≥ 20 mg/L, and inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy. In conclusion, MDROs contribute to adverse outcomes in patients with hematological cancer and bacterial BSIs, with effects varying based on the underlying disease status and causative pathogens. Appropriate initial antibiotic therapy may improve patient outcomes.

The role of surgery for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in paediatric hemato-oncology patients-Can we better define it?

BACKGROUND: Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is a serious condition with high morbidity and mortality in paediatric patients with cancer, haematological diseases or immunodeficiencies with or without allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The role of surgical intervention for the management of IPA has scarcely been investigated. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to present a single center experience of management of IPA in paediatric patients of an oncological ward, to determine the short and long-term outcomes after thoracic surgical interventions, and to outline the indications of surgical interventions in selected patients. PATIENTS/METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 44 paediatric patients with proven and probable IPA treated in our institution between January 2003 and December 2021. The primary endpoint was the overall survival after surgical interventions. Secondary endpoints included post-operative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis of IPA in our cohort was 11.79 years (range 0.11-19.6). The underlying conditions were malignancies in 34 (77%) patients and haematological or immunological disorders with allogeneic HSCT in 9 (23%) patients. We performed thoracic surgical interventions in 10 (22.7%) patients. Most patients received a video assisted thoracic surgery. Only one patient died within 90 days after surgery with a median follow-up time of 50 months. No other major post-operative complications occurred. The calculated 5-year survival rate from IPA for patients after surgical intervention with curative intention was 57% and 56% for patients without (p = .8216). CONCLUSIONS: IPA resulted in relevant morbidity and mortality in our paediatric patient cohort. Thoracic surgical interventions are feasible and may be associated with prolonged survival as a part of multidisciplinary approach in selected paediatric patients with IPA. Larger scale studies are necessary to investigate the variables associated with the necessity of surgery.

[Comparison of clinical features of septic shock in children with hematological malignancies versus children without malignant tumors].

Objective: To investigate the clinical features of septic shock in children with hematological malignancies compared with those without malignant tumor in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Methods: This retrospective study enrolled children with septic shock at the PICU of Capital Institute of Pediatrics' Children's Hospital from June 2015 to July 2022. According to the presence of hematological malignancies, patients were divided into the hematological malignancies group and without malignant tumor group. Clinical data were compared between the two groups, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify related factors for mortality. Results: A total of 164 children (97 males and 67 females) with a median age of 3.6 (interquartile range 0.8, 7.8) years were enrolled, including 75 (45.7%) patients with hematological malignancies and 89 (54.3%) patients without malignant tumors. Patients in the hematological malignancies group were older [6.0(3.6, 9.4) years vs 1.2 (0.4, 4.3) years, P<0.001] and more experienced hospital-acquired infections [48.0%(36/75) vs 21.3%(19/89),P=0.001], compared with patients without malignant tumors. Surgical emergencies were more frequent in patients without malignant tumors (32.6% vs 14.7%, P=0.013). Patients with hematological malignancies mainly had blood stream infections (58.7%), with Gram-negative bacilli (46.7%), meanwhile, patients without malignant tumors more experienced Gram-positive cocci infections (22.5%) of the respiratory system (40.4%) or digestive system (28.1%). There were significant differences regarding the infection sites (P<0.001) and pathogens (P=0.001). The types of antibacterial agents (P<0.001) and the frequency of noradrenaline (P=0.013) used in patients with hematological malignancies were significantly higher than those without malignant tumors. Patients with hematological malignancies had a higher incidence of multiple organ dysfunction (MODS) [100.0%(75/75) vs 80.9%(72/89), P<0.001] and higher 28-day mortality [34.8%(23/66) vs 19.0%(15/79),P=0.048]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that Pediatric Critical Illness Score (PCIS) was an independent factor for death (odds ratio, OR=1.387, 95%CI: 1.161-1.657, P<0.001) in patients with hematological malignancies, and PCIS (OR=1.419, 95%CI: 1.140-1.767, P=0.002) and the 6-hour lactate clearance rate (OR=65.857, 95%CI: 2.953-1 468.638, P=0.008) were independent factors for death in patients without malignant tumors. Conclusions: Children with hematological malignancies were older, more frequently experienced bloodstream infections, and had a higher incidence of MODS and higher 28-day mortality. PCIS is related to poor prognosis of septic shock in children.

Managing and treating COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies: a narrative review and expert insights.

Patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) are at a significantly higher risk of contracting COVID-19 and experiencing severe outcomes compared to individuals without HMs. This heightened risk is influenced by various factors, including the underlying malignancy, immunosuppressive treatments, and patient-related factors. Notably, immunosuppressive regimens commonly used for HM treatment can lead to the depletion of B cells and T cells, which is associated with increased COVID-19-related complications and mortality in these patients. As the pandemic transitions into an endemic state, it remains crucial to acknowledge and address the ongoing risk for individuals with HMs. In this review, we aim to summarize the current evidence to enhance our understanding of the impact of HMs on COVID-19 risks and outcomes, identify particularly vulnerable individuals, and emphasize the need for specialized clinical attention and management. Furthermore, the impaired immune response to COVID-19 vaccination observed in these patients underscores the importance of implementing additional mitigation strategies. This may include targeted prophylaxis and treatment with antivirals and monoclonal antibodies as indicated. To provide practical guidance and considerations, we present two illustrative cases to highlight the real-life challenges faced by physicians caring for patients with HMs, emphasizing the need for individualized management based on disease severity, type, and the unique circumstances of each patient.

Prevalence of PICC-related thrombosis in patients with hematological malignancies: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-related venous thrombosis in patients with hematological malignancies. METHODS: A systematic review of observational studies that evaluated the occurrence of PICC-related venous thrombosis in children, adults, and older people with hematological malignancies was conducted. Searches were carried out on June 12th, 2023 on PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and LILACS, and to gray literature on Google Scholar, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Eligibility criteria were applied independently by two reviewers, first on the titles and abstracts on the Rayyan platform and then on the full text of eligible studies. Risk of bias was assessed by the JBI checklist. Data were summarized descriptively, and the meta-analysis was carried out using the MetaXL 5.3 software. The review followed JBI guidelines and PRISMA for reporting. RESULTS: In the 40 studies included, prevalence of PICC-related venous thrombosis was 9% in general, 9% in adults, and 6% in children with hematological malignancies. Most studies only evaluated cases of symptomatic thrombosis (n = 25; 64%). CONCLUSION: Patients with hematological malignancies using PICC have an estimated prevalence of PICC-related venous thrombosis of 9%, and this rate may be underestimated due to the consideration of mostly symptomatic cases.

High mortality associated with inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy in hematological malignancies with Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections.

Bloodstream infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms such as Klebsiella pneumoniae are a significant challenge in managing hematological malignancies. This study aims to characterize the epidemiology of Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections specifically in patients with hematological malignancies, delineate the patterns of initial antibiotic therapy, assess the prevalence of resistant strains, identify risk factors for these resistant strains, and evaluate factors influencing patient outcomes. A retrospective analysis was conducted at a single center from January 2017 to December 2020, focusing on 182 patients with hematological malignancies who developed Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. We compared the 30-day mortality rates between patients receiving appropriate and inappropriate antibiotic treatments, including the effectiveness of both single-drug and combination therapies. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate logistic and Cox regression were used to identify factors influencing mortality risk. The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 30.2% for all patients. The 30-day all-cause mortality rates were 77.2% and 8.8% in patients who received inappropriate initial treatment and appropriate initial treatment (p < 0.001). Inappropriate initial treatment significantly influenced mortality and was a key predictor of 30-day mortality, along with septic shock and previous intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) bloodstream infections exhibited more severe clinical symptoms compared to the CSKP group. The study demonstrates a significant association between empirical carbapenem administration and the escalating prevalence of CRKP and multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae (MDR-KP) infections. Furthermore, the study identified inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy, septic shock, and ICU admission as independent risk factors for 30-day mortality.

Risk Factors for Teicoplanin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Hematological Malignancies: Focusing on Concomitant Use of Tazobactam/Piperacillin.

Patients with hematological malignancies (HM) often receive tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) and glycopeptide antibiotics for febrile neutropenia. The effect of concomitant use of TAZ/PIPC on risk of teicoplanin (TEIC)-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) remains unclear. We investigated the impact of concomitant TAZ/PIPC use on TEIC-associated AKI in HM patients and identified the risk factors. In this retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study, 203 patients received TEIC, 176 of whom satisfied the selection criteria and were divided into TEIC cohort (no TAZ/PIPC; n = 118) and TEIC + TAZ/PIPC cohort (n = 58). AKI was defined as serum creatinine increase ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 h or ≥50% from baseline. Incidence of AKI in TEIC cohort before and after propensity score matching was 9.3 and 5.9%, respectively, and that in TEIC + TAZ/PIPC cohort was 10.3 and 11.8%. AKI incidence and risk were not significantly different between two cohorts before (p = 0.829; odds ratio (OR) 1.122, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.393-3.202) and after matching (p = 0.244; OR 2.133, 95% CI 0.503-9.043). Logistic regression analysis with factors clinically or mechanistically potentially related to TEIC-associated AKI, including concomitant TAZ/PIPC use, as independent variables identified baseline hemoglobin level as the only significant risk factor for TEIC-associated AKI (p = 0.011; OR 0.484, 95% CI 0.276-0.848). In HM patients treated with TEIC, concomitant TAZ/PIPC use did not increase AKI risk whereas lower hemoglobin levels had higher risk for TEIC-associated AKI development, suggesting the necessity to monitor serum creatinine when using TEIC in patients with anemia.

Changes in respiratory infection trends during the COVID-19 pandemic in patients with haematologic malignancy.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed respiratory infection patterns globally. However, its impact on community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in high-risk patients with haematological malignancies (HM) is uncertain. We aimed to examine how community-acquired pneumonia aetiology in patients with haematological malignancies changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This was a retrospective study that included 524 patients with haematological malignancies hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia between March 2018 and February 2022. Patients who underwent bronchoscopy within 24 h of admission to identify community-acquired pneumonia aetiology were included. Data on patient characteristics, laboratory findings, and results of bronchioalveolar lavage fluid cultures and polymerase chain reaction tests were analysed and compared to identify changes and in-hospital mortality risk factors. RESULTS: Patients were divided into the 'pre-COVID-19 era' (44.5%) and 'COVID-19 era' (55.5%) groups. The incidence of viral community-acquired pneumonia significantly decreased in the COVID-19 era, particularly for influenza A, parainfluenza, adenovirus, and rhinovirus (pre-COVID-19 era vs. COVID-19 era: 3.0% vs. 0.3%, P = 0.036; 6.5% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.001; 5.6% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.015; and 9.5% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001, respectively), whereas that of bacterial, fungal, and unknown community-acquired pneumonia aetiologies remain unchanged. Higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and lower platelet counts correlated with in-hospital mortality after adjusting for potential confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: In the COVID-19 era, the incidence of community-acquired pneumonia with viral aetiologies markedly decreased among patients with haematological malignancies, with no changes in the incidence of bacterial and fungal pneumonia. Further studies are required to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on the prognosis of patients with haematological malignancies and community-acquired pneumonia.

Efficacy of Episil® in patients with hematologic malignancies: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Episil® is a nonabsorbable liquid medical material used to coat and protect the mucosa in patients with oral mucositis. A few studies have reported its efficacy in patients with head and neck cancer. However, reports on its use in patients with hematologic malignancies are scarce. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Episil for the treatment of oral mucositis in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia, malignant lymphoma, acute lymphocytic leukemia, multiple myeloma, and myelodysplastic syndrome. METHODS: Between May 2018 and March 2019, a total of thirty-seven patients with acute myelogenous leukemia, malignant lymphoma, acute lymphocytic leukemia, multiple myeloma, and myelodysplastic syndrome who received Episil® for the treatment of oral mucositis were included in this study. All patients were treated at the Hiroshima Red Cross and Atomic-bomb Surgery Hospital. To determine the severity of oral mucositis, 22 out of the 37 patients were interviewed and compared objectively using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. In addition, subjective measures of the effects of oral mucositis were assessed using an original evaluation protocol (a unique evaluation chart specific to the Department of Oral Surgery, Hiroshima Red Cross & Atomic-bomb Survivors Hospital). RESULTS: Out of 37 participants recruited in the study, 31 (84%) described the sensation of Episil® as very good or good. Moreover, the severity of mucositis was found to decrease after the use of Episil® in seven patients out of 22 (19%), particularly in those with mucositis at multiple sites. Participants' evaluations revealed pain relief and improvement in speech and feeding functions. Participants with grade 3 mucositis reported a greater improvement in pain relief, speech, and feeding functions than those with grade 2 mucositis. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the efficacy of Episil® in treating oral mucositis in patients with hematologic malignancies, particularly in those with oral mucositis at multiple sites. In addition to pain relief, Episil® may improve speech and feeding functions.

Early Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Optimizes Teicoplanin Use in Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Hematological Malignancies.

INTRODUCTION: A target trough concentration (Cmin) of teicoplanin ≥ 15-20 mg/L between the fourth and sixth day has been suggested for severe infections or management of febrile neutropenia (FN). Owing to no reports discussing the impact of early target attainment on treatment outcomes, this study aimed to evaluate the dose-Cmin relationship and clinical outcome and estimate the optimal early target Cmin for FN in patients with hematological malignancies. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study enrolled patients with hematological malignancies who were treated with teicoplanin either as an empirical antibiotic for FN or as targeted treatment for Gram-positive bacteria. Blood samples were collected on day three (48 h) post-loading doses, day 5 (96 h), and day 8 (when applicable) and determined by ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography-triple quadruple mass spectrometry. A total of 117 samples from 47 patients with FN (27 men, 20 women) were consecutively analyzed. A two-tailed α value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean Cmin values at 48 h, 96 h, and on day 8 were 23.4, 21.4, and 27.8 mg/L, respectively. The patients achieving Cmin ≥ 20 mg/L at 48 h had a higher likelihood of treatment success. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.71 for clinical efficacy and the cutoff value of Cmin at 48 h was 18.85 mg/L (95% confidence interval 0.55-0.87; P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The Cmin of teicoplanin after completion of loading doses could predict the treatment response, with a target concentration ≥ 18.85 mg/L.

Outcomes and clinical characteristics of the compassionate use of plitidepsin in COVID-19 patients with solid tumours, haematological malignancies or anti-CD20 antibody treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of plitidepsin antiviral treatment in immunocompromised COVID-19 patients with underlying haematological malignancies or solid tumours, particularly those who have undergone anti-CD20 therapies. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective observational study, involving 54 adults treated with plitidepsin on compassionate use as an antiviral drug. Our analysis compared outcomes between patients with solid tumours and those with haematological malignancies, and a cohort of cases treated or not with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS: Patients with a history of anti-CD20 therapies showed a prolonged time-to-negative RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to non-treated patients (33 d (28;75) vs 15 (11;25); p = .002). Similar results were observed in patients with solid tumours in comparison to those with haematological malignancies (13 (10;16) vs 26 (17;50); p < .001). No serious adverse events were documented. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with haematological malignancies appear to be at a heightened risk for delayed SARS-CoV-2 clearance and subsequent clinical complications. These findings support plitidepsin as a well-tolerated treatment in this high-risk group. A phase II clinical trial (NCT05705167) is ongoing to evaluate plitidepsin as an antiviral drug in this population.KEY POINTSHaematological patients face an increased risk for severe COVID-19.Anti-CD20 therapies could increase fatal outcomes in COVID-19 patients.Persistent viral replication is increased in immunocompromised patients.Plitidepsin does not lead to new serious adverse events in immunocompromised patients.

Management of hematological patients requiring emergency chemotherapy in the intensive care unit.

Hematological malignancies may require rapid-onset treatment because of their short doubling time, notably observed in acute leukemias and specific high-grade lymphomas. Furthermore, in targeted onco-hematological scenarios, chemotherapy is deemed necessary as an emergency measure when facing short-term, life-threatening complications associated with highly chemosensitive hematological malignancies. The risks inherent in the disease itself, or in the initiation of treatment, may then require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) to optimize monitoring and initial management protocols. Hyperleukocytosis and leukostasis in acute leukemias, tumor lysis syndrome, and disseminated intravascular coagulation are the most frequent onco-hematological complications requiring the implementation of emergency chemotherapy in the ICU. Chemotherapy must also be started urgently in secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Tumor-induced microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and plasma hyperviscosity due to malignant monoclonal gammopathy represent infrequent yet substantial indications for emergency chemotherapy. In all cases, the administration of emergency chemotherapy in the ICU requires close collaboration between intensivists and hematology specialists. In this review, we provide valuable insights that aid in the identification and treatment of patients requiring emergency chemotherapy in the ICU, offering diagnostic tools and guidance for their overall initial management.

Infective endocarditis is rare in patients with hematologic malignancy and neutropenia.

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious complication of bloodstream infections (BSIs) that occurs at variable rates depending on the pathogen and clinical setting. There is a paucity of data describing the risk of IE in patients with hematologic malignancy who develop bacteremia while neutropenic. METHODS: Adult patients on the hematology ward from January 2018 to December 2020 with hematologic malignancy and bacteremia were evaluated retrospectively for endocarditis by applying the 2023 Duke-ISCVID criteria. Charts of possible cases were evaluated 90 days after the initial BSI for new infectious complications that could indicate missed IE. Descriptive statistics compared patients admitted for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to those admitted for alternative reasons (non-HSCT). RESULTS: Among the 1005 positive blood cultures initially identified, there were 66 episodes in 65 patients with hematologic malignancy and at least grade 3 neutropenia for a mean duration of 11.4 days during their admission. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed in 34.8% of BSIs, and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in 6.1%. There were no new infectious complications in possible cases 90 days after their initial BSI. No cases of endocarditis were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Endocarditis is rare amongst patients with hematologic malignancy, bacteremia, and neutropenia, and no cases were identified in this cohort. The use of routine TTE in this setting seems unwarranted, and the addition of TEE is unlikely to improve patient-centered outcomes.

COVID-19 infection in children, adolescents, and young adults with Down syndrome and hematologic malignancies.

INTRODUCTION: Children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYAs) with Down syndrome (DS) and hematologic malignancies are particularly vulnerable to infections and related complications. There are limited data regarding COVID-19 infections in this group. We aimed to understand the clinical course of COVID-19 in this population. METHODS: This observational study leverages the de-identified clinical and sociodemographic data captured by the Pediatric Oncology COVID-19 Case Report Registry (POCC) regarding CAYAs with cancer and COVID-19. We evaluated CAYAs (≤21 years at COVID-19 infection) with hematologic malignancies and COVID-19 reported from April 1, 2020 to May 2, 2023, comparing those with and without DS. Using multivariable logistic regression, we examined rates of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, respiratory support, and changes in cancer-directed therapy. RESULTS: Among 1408 CAYAs with hematologic malignancies, 55 had DS (CAYA-DS). CAYA-DS had higher rates of hospitalization, ICU admission, and respiratory support (p < .001) than CAYAs without DS. Similarly, multivariable analyses found higher odds of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] = 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-5.1), ICU admission (OR = 4.2, 95% CI: 1.9-9.1), and need for respiratory support (OR = 4.2, 95% CI: 2.0-8.8) among CAYA-DS. Modifications to cancer-directed therapy were more common among CAYA-DS when related to neutropenia (p = .001), but not when unrelated to neutropenia (p = .88); CAYA-DS did not have higher odds of changes to cancer-directed therapy (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 0.7-2.1). CONCLUSIONS: We identify CAYA-DS with hematologic malignancies as a vulnerable subpopulation at greater risk for severe COVID-19 infection. This can inform conversations with patients and families regarding therapeutic and preventive measures, as well as the risks and benefits of modifying chemotherapy in the setting of COVID-19.

Managing infectious challenges in the age of molecular-targeted therapies for adult hematological malignancies.

Over the last decade, the therapeutic landscape for hematological malignancies (HMs) has witnessed a remarkable surge in the development of novel biological and small-molecule-targeted immunomodulatory agents. These therapies have drastically improved survival, but some come at the cost of increased risk of bacterial, viral, and/or fungal infections and on-target off-tumor immunological side effects. To mitigate such risks, physicians must be well informed about infectious complications and necessary preventive measures, such as screening, vaccinations, and antimicrobial prophylaxis. Furthermore, physicians should be vigilant about the noninfectious side effects of these agents that can mimic infections and understand their potential drug-drug interactions with antimicrobials. Strengthening and harmonizing the current surveillance and reporting system for drug-associated infections in real-world settings is essential to better ascertain the potential infections associated with these agents. In this review, we aimed to summarize the infection risks associated with novel agents used for specific HMs and outline recommended strategies for monitoring and prophylaxis.

Efficacy of surgical treatment of perianal infection in patients with hematological malignancy.

The efficacy of surgical intervention for perianal infection in patients with hematologic malignancies is not well established. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and complications of surgical treatment of perianal infection in patients with hematologic malignancies. This retrospective study included patients with hematological malignancies who were diagnosed with perianal infections and treated at the China Aerospace Science & Industry Corporation 731 Hospital between 2018 and 2022. Patient characteristics, hematological data, surgical intervention, and complications, including recurrence and mortality, were analyzed. This study included 156 patients with leukemia aged 2 months to 71 years who were treated surgically for perianal infection, comprising 94 males and 62 females. Perianal infection included 36 cases of abscesses, 91 anal fistulas, and 29 anal fissures accompanied by infection. A total of 36 patients developed severe complications postoperatively, including 4 patients who died, 6 patients with severe incision bleeding, 18 patients with severe pain, 6 patients with sepsis, 12 patients who needed reoperation, 15 patients with hospitalization for more than 2 weeks, and 3 patients with anal stenosis; none of the patients developed anal incontinence. Additionally, risk factors for postoperative complications of perianal infection in patients with hematologic malignancies include leukopenia, agranulocytosis, thrombocytopenia, depth of abscess and not undergone an MRI. Surgical intervention may improve the prognosis of patients with perianal abscess formation, particularly in patients who show no improvement with medical therapy and those who develop perianal sepsis. Granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia should be improved before surgery, which can significantly reduce postoperative complications. Although these findings are from a case series without a comparator, they may be of value to physicians because to the best of our knowledge, no randomized or prospective studies have been conducted on the management of perianal infections in patients with hematological malignancies.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in patients with monoclonal gammopathy and renal damage in central China: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Renal involvement is common in monoclonal gammopathy (MG); however, the same patient may have both MG and non-paraprotein-associated renal damage. Accordingly, distinguishing the cause of renal damage is necessary because of the different clinical characteristics and associated treatments. In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we described the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of 703 patients with MG and renal damage in central China. Patients were classified as having MG of renal significance (MGRS), MG of undetermined significance (MGUS), or hematological malignancy. 260 (36.98%), 259 (36.84%), and 184 (26.17%) had MGRS, MGUS, and hematological malignancies, respectively. Amyloidosis was the leading pattern of MGRS (74.23%), followed by thrombotic microangiopathy (8.85%) and monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (8.46%). Membranous nephropathy was the leading diagnosis of MGUS (39.38%). Renal pathological findings of patients with hematological malignancies included paraprotein-associated lesions (84.78%) and non-paraprotein-associated lesions (15.22%). The presence of nephrotic syndrome and an abnormal free light chain (FLC) ratio were independently associated with MGRS. The overall survival was better in patients with MGUS than in those with MGRS or hematological malignancies.

Immunoglobulin replacement vs prophylactic antibiotics for hypogammaglobulinemia secondary to hematological malignancy.

ABSTRACT: Immunoglobulin replacement and prophylactic antibiotics are commonly used to prevent infections in patients with secondary hypogammaglobulinemia due to hematological malignancies but have never been directly compared. In this randomized controlled feasibility trial conducted in 7 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand, we enrolled patients with secondary hypogammaglobulinemia with either a history of recurrent/severe infection or an immunoglobulin G level <4 g/L. Participants were randomized in a 1:2 ratio to immunoglobulin (0.4 g/kg per 4 weeks IV) or daily antibiotics (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 160 mg/800 mg or, if contraindicated, 100 mg doxycycline) for 12 months. Participants allocated to antibiotics were allowed to crossover after grade ≥3 infections. The primary outcome was proportion of patients alive on the assigned treatment 12 months after randomization. Between August 2017 and April 2019, 63 patients were randomized: 42 to antibiotics and 21 to immunoglobulin. Proportion of participants alive on allocated treatment at 12 months was 76% in the immunoglobulin and 71% in the antibiotic arm (Fisher exact test P=.77; odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.22-2.52). The lower quartile for time to first major infection (median, not reached) was 11.1 months for the immunoglobulin and 9.7 months for the antibiotic arm (log-rank test, P=.65). Three participants in the immunoglobulin and 2 in the antibiotic arm had grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events. A similar proportion of participants remained on antibiotic prophylaxis at 12 months to those on immunoglobulin, with similar rates of major infections. Our findings support the feasibility of progressing to a phase 3 trial. Trial registration #ACTRN12616001723471.