Re-irradiation of anaplastic meningioma: higher dose and concomitant Bevacizumab may improve progression-free survival.

INTRODUCTION: Anaplastic meningiomas, categorized as WHO grade 3 tumors, are rare and highly aggressive, accounting for 1-2% of all meningioma cases. Despite aggressive treatment, including surgery and Radiation, they exhibit a high recurrence rate and poor survival outcomes. The aggressive histopathological features emphasize the urgent need for effective management strategies. METHODS: A retrospective multi-institutional analysis was conducted on patients with recurrent anaplastic meningioma who underwent re-irradiation between 2017 and 2023. Clinical, dosimetric, and outcome data were collected and analyzed, focusing on local control, progression free survival and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: Thirty-four cases were analyzed, with a median follow-up 11 months after re-irradiation. Progression-free survival at 12 months was 61.9%, with higher doses correlating with better outcomes. Concomitant Bevacizumab improves progression-free survival and reduces the risk of radiation necrosis. CDKN2A homozygote deletion correlated with a higher risk of local failure. Symptomatic radiation necrosis occurred in 20.5% of cases, but its incidence was lower with concomitant Bevacizumab treatment. CONCLUSION: Re-irradiation presents a viable option for recurrent anaplastic meningioma despite the associated risk of radiation necrosis. Higher doses with concomitant Bevacizumab improve clinical outcomes and reduce toxicity. Individualized treatment approaches are necessary, emphasizing the importance of further research to refine management strategies for this challenging disease.

Consensus guidelines for the management of primary supra-tentorial intraventricular tumour for low- and middle-income countries.

Almost any primary or metastatic brain tumour can manifest in intraventricular (IV) locations. These tumours may either originate within the ventricular system or extend into the IV space through growth. Such neoplasms represent a broad spectrum, with supratentorial IV tumours forming a heterogeneous group. This group includes primary ependymal tumours, central neurocytomas, choroid plexus tumours, and notably, meningiomas, as well as a variety of non-neoplastic, benign, glial, and metastatic lesions that can secondarily invade the IV compartment. Often presenting with nonspecific symptoms, these tumours can lead to delayed medical attention. The diversity in potential diagnoses, combined with their deep and complex locations, poses significant management challenges. This paper aims to delineate optimal management strategies, underscoring the importance of multidisciplinary care, especially in settings with limited resources, to effectively navigate the complexities associated with treating intraventricular brain tumours.

Impact on natural history of atypical meningioma after changes in 2016 edition of the world health organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumors: a literature review.

Meningiomas and their WHO histological diagnostic criteria is complex, especially for grade 2 tumors presenting a interobserver discordance as high as 12.2%. The 2016 edition of the WHO Classification of CNS tumors recommended brain invasion as a stand-alone grading criterion for diagnosing an atypical grade 2 meningioma (AM). To provide an overview of the classification of 2016 WHO impact on the natural history of atypical meningioma (AM) relative to previous classification. To achieve this goal, we selected articles from the period 2017-2024 in Medline search on atypical meningiomas and analyzed them after following the following criteria: 1) reports with confirmed histopathological diagnosis according to WHO 2016 and or 2021 criteria; 2) series and case reports; 3) detailed and individualized clinical outcomes for AM; and 4) papers written in English; after that a total of 3445 patients reported in 67 manuscripts from worldwide centers from 2017 to March 2024 were analyzed. The patient's age at the time of surgery ranged from 1 month to 97 years (mean 52.28 ± 18.7 years). The most common tumor site was the convexity, accounting for 67.8%, followed by the skull base in 30.6%, ventricle in 1%, and spine in 0.6%; Gross total resection (GTR) was performed in 71.25% and subtotal resection (STR) in 28.75%; 1021 patients (29.63%) underwent adjuvant radiotherapy, and 22 patients (0.6%) were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy; tumor recurrence was reported in 1221 patients (35.44%) and 859 deaths (24.93%). 1) AM prevalence in females; 2) AM age distribution similar to the distribution of meningiomas in general; 3) AM recurrence rate of 35.44%, despite the high rate of GTR, which was higher than previously reported; 4) deepening knowledge in molecular mechanism of tumor progression will provide alternative therapeutic approaches for AM.

Consensus guidelines for the management of intracranial meningioma for low- and middle-income countries.

Intra-cranial meningiomas represent the most common type of extra-axial brain tumour in adults. Characteristically slow-growing and often asymptomatic, these tumours may only require observation in some cases. However, lesions that cause a significant mass effect necessitate intervention, primarily through surgical means. Additionally, in cases of significant unresectable low-grade residual meningioma or high-grade tumours, radiation therapy becomes essential. Notably, current management guidelines predominantly reflect data derived from high-income countries, failing to address constraints prevalent in the developing world, such as limited financial resources and restricted access to advanced surgical facilities. This manuscript introduces guidelines specifically tailored for the management of meningioma in patients from low- and middle-income countries, considering their unique healthcare challenges and resources.

The Molecular and Immunological Landscape of Meningiomas.

Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors in adults and typically have a slow-growing and benign nature. However, there is also a substantial subset of meningiomas that shows aggressive clinical behavior and is refractory to standard treatment modalities, which are still limited to surgery and/or radiotherapy. Despite intensive research, no systemic treatment options are yet available in the clinic for these challenging tumors, resulting in poor patient outcome. Intensive research on the molecular pathogenesis of meningiomas has led to improved diagnostic tools, but so far there is no standardized implementation for the molecular profiling of these tumors for clinical practice. Recent research advances have also focused on the immunophenotyping of meningiomas, leading to several clinical trials examining the use of immune checkpoint blockade therapy in patients with clinically aggressive subtypes. In this review, we aim to summarize the current knowledge on the molecular and immunological landscape of meningiomas in detail and provide current and progressive ideas for future directions.

Current immunotherapy techniques in meningioma.

INTRODUCTION: Although meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumor, there are limited treatment options for recurrent or aggressive lesions. Compared to other brain tumors, meningiomas may be uniquely amenable to immunotherapy by virtue of their location outside the blood-brain barrier. AREAS COVERED: This review describes our current understanding of the immunology of the meninges, as well as immune cell infiltration and immune signaling in meningioma. Current literature on meningioma immunology and immunotherapy was comprehensively reviewed and summarized by a comprehensive search of MEDLINE (1/1/1990-6/1/2024). Further, we describe the current state of immunotherapeutic approaches, as well as potential future targets. Potential immunotherapeutic approaches include immune checkpoint inhibition, CAR-T approaches, tumor vaccine therapy, and immunogenic molecular markers. EXPERT OPINION: Meningioma immunotherapy is in early stages, as no immunotherapies are currently included in treatment guidelines. There is substantial heterogeneity in immune cell infiltration, immunogenicity, and immune escape across tumors, even within tumor grade. Furthering our understanding of meningioma immunology and tumor classification will allow for careful selection of tumors and patient populations that may benefit from primary or adjunctive immunotherapy for meningioma.

AB044. Leptomeningeal metastatic esthesioneuroblastoma: a systematic review with case illustration.

BACKGROUND: Esthesioneuroblastomas (ENBs) represent a rare subset of malignancies originating within the upper aerodigestive tract, characterized by a propensity for local metastasis to the intracranial compartment through the cribriform plate. These neoplasms are frequently associated with a high incidence of local recurrence subsequent to therapeutic intervention. In this report, we review the literature and present a case of a patient with extensive meningeal and leptomeningeal dissemination of ENB, with a survival period of 2 years. METHODS: A systematic review of literature was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Additionally, the presentation, surgical management, chemotherapy, and outcomes of a 60-year-old female presenting with extensive meningeal metastasis at onset. RESULTS: Following the literature review, 43 distinct works were identified, extracted variables from the remaining seven papers that met our inclusion criteria included demographic data, presenting symptoms, recurrence status, primary tumor location, location of Leptomeningeal metastasis of ENB, interval from initial treatment to recurrence, initial treatment approach, treatment-related complications, survival outcomes, and post-treatment status of patients. The average age at diagnosis was 52.6 years (range, 31-76 years), with females comprising 63.6% of the sample. The majority underwent gross-total resection and received adjuvant radiotherapy as initial therapy. The median time to intracranial metastasis was 57 months post-primary tumor diagnosis. The median overall survival for ENB with intracranial metastasis was 14 months. CONCLUSIONS: ENB exhibits a marked propensity for recurrence and can metastasize to the intracranial space years post-remission, which correlates with reduced survival. Therefore, perpetual radiographic surveillance is warranted for all ENB patients to detect late recurrences and intracranial spread promptly.

AB050. Novel treatment vs. standard of care in melanoma-associated leptomeningeal metastases: a systematic review & network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma stands as a prevalent instigator of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) within the realm of cancer. Given the poor prognosis accompanying this condition, ongoing trials explore a spectrum of treatment modalities in pursuit of more effective interventions. To ascertain the most effective therapeutic strategies, we aim to compare novel treatments against the current standard of care for melanoma-associated LMD. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Web of Science for relevant studies published from January 2014 to January 2024. We included primary research studies, including observational studies, randomised control trials, quasi-experimental design studies, clinical trials, and experimental studies focusing on LMD caused by metastatic melanoma. Data extraction was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and quality assessment/risk of bias is performed individually using the GRADE method. A network meta-analysis is conducted to evaluate the effects of multiple interventions within the study. Overall survival outcomes were quantified using log hazard ratio. RESULTS: Out of 680 records screened for eligibility, seven carefully chosen studies, meeting our specific inclusion criteria, provide insights into the management of 397 patients grappling with LMD due to metastatic melanoma. These studies vary in design: one observational cohort study with 29 participants, a clinical trial with 25 patients, four retrospective cohort studies ranging from 39 to 190 participants and one experimental study with 24 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the escalating breakthroughs of treatment options in melanoma-associated LMD, further studies may be imperative to conclusively determine whether the newer therapeutic options yield superior outcomes compared to the current standard of care treatments.

Looking backward toward the future: A bibliometric analysis of the last 40 years of meningioma global outcomes.

This study is the first comprehensive bibliometric analysis about meningioma to date. The aim of this study is to identify the most influential publications in this field through citation and co-citation analysis, to examine international collaborations, to identify the conceptual framework of the subject and emerging trending topics through keyword analysis, and to identify the most productive countries, authors and journals. 9619 articles on meningioma published between 1980 and 2023 were downloaded from the Web of Science (WoS) database and statistically analyzed. In this study, various bibliometric techniques were utilized, including trend keyword analysis, thematic evolution analysis, factor analysis, conceptual structure analysis, citation and co-citation analyses. Bibliometric network visualization maps were created to identify trend topics, citation analysis and cross-country collaborations. The Exponential Smoothing estimator was used to predict article productivity in the coming years. The first 3 countries that contributed the most to the literature were respectively; USA (2664, 27.7%), Japan (972, 10.1%), Germany (943, 9.8%). The first three most productive journals were respectively; Journal of Neurosurgery (number of article = 496), World Neurosurgery (399), Acta Neurochirurgica (378). The most productive author was Mcdermott MW (number of article = 88) and the most active institution was the University of California System (number of article = 470). In addition to high-grade meningiomas, the most studied topics from past to present have been magnetic resonance imaging, recurrence, radiation therapy, and skull base. As a result of the analyses to determine trend topics, the subjects studied in recent years were diagnostic and imaging methods, surgical and treatment methods, prognosis and survival, epidemiology and quality of life, and with the advancement of technology, machine learning and prediction models. Scientific collaboration was seen primarily in articles from western countries, especially the USA, European countries, and Canada. However, there was also a not insignificant effect in developing countries such as China, India, and Turkey.

[Preoperative Embolization of Intracranial Meningioma].

Preoperative embolization(POE)of intracranial meningioma is performed worldwide. Although clear evidence of the effectiveness of POE has not been reported in the literature, the technique plays an important role in open surgery, especially for large or skull base meningiomas. The purposes of embolization include: 1)induction of tumor necrosis, resulting in a safer operation, 2)reduction in intraoperative bleeding, and 3)decrease in operative time. Knowledge of the functional vascular anatomy, embolic materials, and endovascular techniques is paramount to ensure safe embolization. Our standard procedure is as follows: 1)embolization is performed several days before open surgery; 2)in cases with strong peritumoral edema, steroid administration or embolization may be performed immediately prior to surgery; 3)patients undergo the procedure under local anesthesia; 4)the microcatheter is inserted as close as possible to the tumor; 5)particulate emboli are the first-line material; 6)embolization is occasionally performed with N-butyl cyanoacrylate(NBCA)glue; and 7)if possible, additional proximal feeder occlusion with coils is performed. The JR-NET study previous showed the situation regarding intracranial tumor embolization in Japan. Endovascular neurosurgeons should fully discuss the indications and strategies for POE with tumor neurosurgeons to ensure safe and effective procedures.

[Role of Pharmacotherapy in Treatment of Meningiomas].

Meningiomas constitute the most common primary tumors of the central nervous system. Despite maximum treatment, grade 2/3 meningiomas are associated with a high risk of recurrence. Stereotactic radiosurgery is the treatment of choice as adjuvant treatment for grade 2/3 meningiomas. Currently, pharmacotherapies, including molecular targeted therapy for various growth factors, their receptors, and the associated pathways, have shown limited effectiveness for management of refractory or recurrent meningiomas. Therefore, novel systemic treatment approaches are urgently required in such cases. Recent advances in genetics and epigenetics and the identification of specific genetic alterations have led to new classifications of these tumors and the development of therapeutic targets. Identification of targeted gene mutations may lead to precision-based medicine. Other therapeutic approaches such as immune checkpoint inhibitors rarely elicit a significant response in meningiomas with a high tumor mutation burden. Combination therapies that affect these multiple targets are also considered adjuvant therapeutic options. Comprehensive/in-depth research is warranted to investigate the safety and efficacy of other treatment strategies, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, oncolytic virus immunotherapy, and gene therapy. In this article, we review the current evidence regarding the efficacy of systemic treatments available in the literature and discuss recent and ongoing trials for meningiomas.

[Preoperative Embolization Performed Before Meningioma Resection Might Inhibit Tumor Recurrence].

Recent advances in endovascular treatment have improved the safety and efficacy of this procedure, and the number of cases in which preoperative embolization is performed is likely to increase. Preoperative tumor embolization is still a controversial treatment, and as long as it carries a risk of complications, its primary benefit of reducing blood loss during surgery may not be sufficient to justify treatment. We recently reported that preoperative embolization does not significantly increase complications, but may prolong recurrence-free survival. However, currently, tumor embolization is only a preoperative adjunctive therapy, and there is no evidence that it is a stand-alone option for meningioma treatment. Nevertheless, the possibility that tumor embolization alone can promote tumor shrinkage and reduce peripheral oedema has been reported, although the number of cases is small. Further research is needed, but in the future, tumor embolization may become an in-office treatment under certain conditions, such as in cases of poor general condition, multiple meningiomas, recurrent and refractory cases, difficult surgery and cases where re-irradiation is difficult after post-radiation therapy.

[Challenges to Overcome in Clinical Research on Meningiomas].

In contrast to other cancer research areas, the development of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for meningiomas has been challenging, lacking standardized criteria for assessing treatment response and progression. Although efforts by RANO have proposed evaluation criteria, a consensus on effective evaluation parameters for meningiomas remains elusive. This paper underscores the importance of establishing efficacy endpoints in clinical trials, compares efficacy assessment in meningioma research with other solid tumor areas, and outlines the challenges ahead in meningioma research. Recent analyses revealed the absence of consensus on efficacy endpoints in meningioma trials, complicating trial design and hindering cross-trial comparisons. The unique anatomical constraints and histological variability of meningiomas pose challenges in determining appropriate efficacy measures. To address these challenges, future research must focus on accumulating prognostic data, standardizing evaluation criteria, and considering multiple endpoints in trial designs. Akin to other cancer areas, investigating targeted therapies and establishing international consensus on efficacy endpoints are crucial steps forward.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with metastatic breast cancer and leptomeningeal disease: a single center retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). It is critical to better understand the risk factors, natural history, and treatment outcomes, including patients in a modern cohort. METHODS: In this single center retrospective cohort study, we identified patients with MBC and LMD who received care from 2000 to 2024 and abstracted key clinical, treatment, and survival data. RESULTS: We identified 111 patients with MBC and LMD, including patients with the following subtypes: HR+/HER2- (n = 53, 47.7%), HER2+ (n = 30, 27.0%), and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC; n = 28, 25.2%). Median time from the diagnosis of MBC to LMD was 16.4 months (range 0-101.3 months). After the diagnosis of LMD, most patients received systemic therapy (n = 66, 59.5%) and/or central nervous system (CNS)-directed therapy (n = 94, 84.7%) including intrathecal therapy (n = 42, 37.8%) and/or CNS-directed radiation therapy (n = 70, 63.1%). In all patients, median overall survival (OS) from the diagnosis of LMD to death was 4.1 months (range 0.1-78.1 months) and varied by subtype, with HR+/HER2- or HER2+ MBC patients living longer than those with TNBC (4.2 and 6.8 months respectively vs. 2.0 months, p < 0.01, HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.36-3.39). Patients who received CNS-directed therapy lived longer than those who did not (4.2 vs. 1.3, p = 0.02 HR 0.54, 0.32-0.91). Patients diagnosed with LMD from 2015 to 2024 lived longer than those diagnosed from 2000 to 2014 (6.4 vs. 2.9 months, p = 0.04, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.99). On multivariable analysis, having TNBC was associated with shorter OS from time of LMD to death (p = 0.004, HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.25-3.30). CONCLUSION: This is one of the largest case series of patients with MBC and LMD. Patients diagnosed with LMD from 2015 to 2024 lived longer than those diagnosed from 2000 to 2014, although median OS was short overall. Patients with TNBC and LMD had particularly short OS. Novel therapeutic strategies for LMD remain an area of unmet clinical need.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma with leptomeningeal metastases has been treated with comprehensive treatment for long-term survival: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma has a high incidence in East and Southeast Asia, often with distant metastasis. However, leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is extremely rare and usually has a poor prognosis. This paper reports the clinical treatment of a patient with meningeal metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in order to improve the clinician's understanding of the disease. Early diagnosis of the disease can alleviate the pain of patients and prolong their survival time. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report the case of a 55-year-old female with a history of NPC with LM. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed temporal lobe enhancement, peripheral edema, and enhancement of the adjacent meninges. Cerebrospinal fluid cytology suggests the presence of malignant tumor cells. DIAGNOSES: The patient was diagnosed with LM from NPC. INTERVENTIONS: The patients were regularly given targeted therapy with nimotuzumab, immunotherapy with karyolizumab, and lumbar intrathecal methotrexate chemotherapy and supportive treatment. OUTCOMES: The patient had survived for 3 years since the diagnosis of LM and was in good condition and still under active antitumor treatment. LESSONS: Leptomeningeal metastasis of NPC is a rare disease. Although there is currently no unified treatment plan, the neurological symptoms can still be controlled and the quality of life can be improved through active treatment.

Joint EANM/EANO/RANO/SNMMI practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands: version 1.0.

PURPOSE: To provide practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands. METHODS: This joint practice guideline/procedure standard was collaboratively developed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), the European Association of Neurooncology (EANO), and the PET task force of the Response Assessment in Neurooncology Working Group (PET/RANO). RESULTS: Positron emission tomography (PET) using somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands can detect meningioma tissue with high sensitivity and specificity and may provide clinically relevant information beyond that obtained from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) imaging alone. SSTR-directed PET imaging can be particularly useful for differential diagnosis, delineation of meningioma extent, detection of osseous involvement, and the differentiation between posttherapeutic scar tissue and tumour recurrence. Moreover, SSTR-peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging investigational treatment approach for meningioma. CONCLUSION: These practice guidelines will define procedure standards for the application of PET imaging in patients with meningiomas and related SSTR-targeted PRRTs in routine practice and clinical trials and will help to harmonize data acquisition and interpretation across centers, facilitate comparability of studies, and to collect larger databases. The current document provides additional information to the evidence-based recommendations from the PET/RANO Working Group regarding the utilization of PET imaging in meningiomas Galldiks (Neuro Oncol. 2017;19(12):1576-87). The information provided should be considered in the context of local conditions and regulations.

Leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: A Society for Neuro-Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus review on clinical management and future directions.

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are increasingly becoming recognized as a treatable, yet generally incurable, complication of advanced cancer. As modern cancer therapeutics have prolonged the lives of patients with metastatic cancer, specifically in patients with parenchymal brain metastases, treatment options, and clinical research protocols for patients with LM from solid tumors have similarly evolved to improve survival within specific populations. Recent expansions in clinical investigation, early diagnosis, and drug development have given rise to new unanswered questions. These include leptomeningeal metastasis biology and preferred animal modeling, epidemiology in the modern cancer population, ensuring validation and accessibility of newer leptomeningeal metastasis diagnostics, best clinical practices with multimodality treatment options, clinical trial design and standardization of response assessments, and avenues worthy of further research. An international group of multi-disciplinary experts in the research and management of LM, supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology, were assembled to reach a consensus opinion on these pressing topics and provide a roadmap for future directions. Our hope is that these recommendations will accelerate collaboration and progress in the field of LM and serve as a platform for further discussion and patient advocacy.

Management Approaches in WHO Grade III Meningioma: A National Oncology Trainees' Collaborative for Healthcare Research (NOTCH) UK Multi-Centre Retrospective Study.

AIMS: WHO Grade 3 (G3) meningiomas are rare tumours with limited data to guide management. This retrospective study documents UK management approaches across 14 centres over 11 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with WHO G3 meningioma between 01/01/2008 and 31/12/2018 were identified. Data were collected on demographics, management strategy, adjuvant radiotherapy, approach in recurrence setting and survival. RESULTS: 84 patients were identified. 21.4% transformed from lower-grade disease. 96.4% underwent primary surgical resection, with 20.8% having evidence of residual disease on their post-op MRI. 59.3% of patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following surgical resection. Overall median PFS and OS were 12.6 months and 28.2 months, respectively. Median OS in the group who underwent complete surgical resection was 34.9 months, compared to 27.5 months for those who had incomplete resection (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.27-1.23, p = 0.15). Median OS was 33.1 months for those who underwent adjuvant RT and 14.0 months for those who did not (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.84, p = 0.004). Median adjuvant RT dose delivered was 60Gy (range 12Gy-60Gy), 45.8% of adjuvant RT was delivered using IMRT. At disease relapse, 31% underwent salvage surgery and 29.3% underwent salvage RT. Of those treated with salvage RT, 64.7% were re-treats and all were treated with hypofractionated RT. CONCLUSION: Surgery continues to be the preferred primary management strategy. Post-operative MRI within 48 hours is indicated to assess presence of residual disease and guide further surgical options. Adjuvant radiotherapy plays an important part of the management paradigm in these patients with the data supporting an attached survival advantage. Further surgery and re-irradiation is an option in the disease recurrence setting with radiosurgery frequently utilised in this context.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Leptomeningeal Disease Following Receipt of EGFR-Targeted Therapy, Immune-Checkpoint Blockade, Intrathecal Chemotherapy, or Radiation Therapy Alone.

BACKGROUND: EGFR-targeted therapy (ETT) and immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) have shown promising results in treating NSCLC brain metastases (BM). However, little is known of their effect in treating leptomeningeal disease (LMD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 80 patients diagnosed with NSCLC LMD from January 2014 to March 2021. Patients were grouped based on initial LMD treatment: radiotherapy (RT) alone, ETT, ICB, and intrathecal chemotherapy (ITC). RESULTS: EGFR mutation was present in 22 patients (28%). Twenty patients had positive cytology in cerebrospinal fluid, while 60 patients were diagnosed based on MRI with clinical correlation. The RT alone group consisted primarily of whole brain radiation (n = 20; 77%), stereotactic radiation (n = 3; 12%), and palliative spine radiation (n = 2; 7%). There were no significant differences amongst the treatment groups in age, performance status, or neurologic symptoms. Overall, the 6-month overall survival (OS) and craniospinal progression free survival (CS-PFS) were 35% and 24%, respectively. The 6-month OS for the ETT, ICB, ITC, and RT alone groups was 64%, 33%, 57%, and 29% respectively (log-rank P = .026). The 6-month CS-PFS for the ETT, ICB, ITC, and RT alone groups was 43%, 33%, 29%, and 19% respectively (log-rank P = .049). Upon univariate analysis, receipt of ETT compared to RT alone reached significance for OS (HR 0.35, P = .006) and CS-PFS (HR 0.39, P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis for patients with NSCLC LMD remains poor overall. However, the receipt of ETT for patients with EGFR-positive disease was associated with improved outcomes.

Understanding diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumors.

INTODUCTION: Diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumors (DLGNTs) pose a rare and challenging entity within pediatric central nervous system neoplasms. Despite their rarity, DLGNTs exhibit complex clinical presentations and unique molecular characteristics, necessitating a deeper understanding of their diagnostic and therapeutic nuances. METHODS: This review synthesizes contemporary literature on DLGNT, encompassing epidemiology, clinical manifestations, pathological features, treatment strategies, prognostic markers, and future research directions. To compile the existing body of knowledge on DLGNT, a comprehensive search of relevant databases was conducted. RESULTS: DLGNT primarily affects pediatric populations but can manifest across all age groups. Its diagnosis is confounded by nonspecific clinical presentations and overlapping radiological features with other CNS neoplasms. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as a cornerstone for DLGNT diagnosis, revealing characteristic leptomeningeal enhancement and intraparenchymal involvement. Histologically, DLGNT presents with low to moderate cellularity and exhibits molecular alterations in the MAPK/ERK signalling pathway. Optimal management of DLGNT necessitates a multidisciplinary approach encompassing surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and emerging targeted therapies directed against specific genetic alterations. Prognostication remains challenging, with factors such as age at diagnosis, histological subtypes, and genetic alterations influencing disease progression and treatment response. Long-term survival data are limited, underscoring the need for collaborative research efforts. CONCLUSION: Advancements in molecular profiling, targeted therapies, and international collaborations hold promise for improving DLGNT outcomes. Harnessing the collective expertise of clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates, can advance the field of DLGNT research and optimize patient care paradigms.