RESUMO
The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer has been rising over the last two decades. Tumors in young patients have distinct features compared to older patients. They predominantly arise in the distal colon and rectum and have poor histological features. Patients tend to present at a more advanced stage and be exposed to more aggressive management approaches; however, this has not translated into a significant survival benefit compared to their older counterparts. This chapter will share current evidence on risk factors and management options for early onset colorectal cancer with a focus on rectal cancer.
Assuntos
Idade de Início , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Retais/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Incidência , PrognósticoRESUMO
Background: Anorectal melanoma (AM) is a rare and aggressive type of tumor, with varied and inconclusive scientific information. Its preoperative diagnosis is challenging due to its rarity and similarity to other anorectal conditions. It represents only 1.3% of melanomas and affects more women than men. Approximately 20-30% of AM cases are amelanotic, complicating endoscopic detection and leading to misdiagnoses. AM is often confused with hemorrhoids, polyps, and rectal cancer in two thirds of patients due to similar symptoms. The causes and risk factors of AM are not well understood, but they are suspected to differ from cutaneous and ocular melanomas. Diagnosis is performed through biopsy and immunohistochemical staining. Colonoscopy helps to characterize the lesions, and histological examination is crucial for definitive diagnosis. Clinical case: 50-year-old woman with rectal bleeding and proctalgia. AM was diagnosed through colonoscopy, and transanal resection with hemorrhoidectomy was performed. Conclusions: Management of AM is complicated by the lack of randomized trials. Resection surgery is the standard treatment, but there is no established protocol. Wide local excision may be an option for limited cases. Further research is needed to improve the management and treatment of AM. Early detection and complete surgical removal are crucial for enhancing survival in these patients.
Introducción: el melanoma anorrectal (MA) es un tipo raro y agresivo de tumor, cuya información científica es variada y poco concluyente. Su diagnóstico preoperatorio es un desafío debido a su rareza y a su similitud con otras afecciones anorrectales. Representa solo el 1.3% de los melanomas y afecta más a mujeres que a hombres. Aproximadamente el 20-30% de los casos de MA son amelanóticos, lo que complica su detección endoscópica y conduce a diagnósticos erróneos. El MA se confunde con hemorroides, pólipos y cáncer de recto en dos tercios de los pacientes debido a síntomas similares. Las causas y factores de riesgo del MA aún no se conocen bien, pero se sospecha que son diferentes de los melanomas cutáneos y oculares. El diagnóstico se realiza mediante biopsia y tinción inmunohistoquímica. La colonoscopía permite caracterizar las lesiones y el examen histológico es crucial para el diagnóstico definitivo. Caso clínico: mujer de 50 años con rectorragia y proctalgia. Se diagnosticó MA mediante colonoscopía y se realizó una resección transanal con hemorroidectomía. Conclusiones: el manejo del MA es complicado por la falta de ensayos aleatorizados. La cirugía de resección es el tratamiento habitual, pero no hay un protocolo establecido. La escisión local amplia puede ser una opción para casos limitados. Se necesita más investigación para mejorar el manejo y tratamiento del MA. La detección temprana y la extirpación quirúrgica completa son cruciales para mejorar la supervivencia en estos pacientes.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Ânus , Melanoma , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Neoplasias Retais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias do Ânus/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Ânus/patologia , Neoplasias do Ânus/cirurgia , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/patologia , Melanoma/cirurgia , Colonoscopia , HemorroidectomiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the minimally invasive approach and early rehabilitation, abdominal-perineal resection (APR) remains a procedure with high morbidity, notably due to postoperative trapped bowel ileus and perineal healing complications. Several surgical techniques have been described for filling the pelvic void to prevent abscess formation and ileus by trapped bowel loop. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare the post APR complications for cancer of two of these techniques, omentoplasty and cecal mobilization, in a single-center study from an expert colorectal surgery center. PATIENTS: From 2012 to 2022, 84 patients were included, including 58 (69%) with omentoplasty and 26 (31%) with cecal mobilization. They all underwent APR at Bordeaux University Hospital Center. SETTINGS: A propensity score was used to avoid confounding factors as far as possible. Patient and procedure characteristics were initially comparable. RESULTS: The 30-day complication rate was significantly higher in the cecal mobilization group (53.8% vs. 5.2% p < 0.01), as was the rate of pelvic abscess (34.6% vs. 0% p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that, when feasible, omentoplasty should be considered the preferred method for pelvic reconstruction following APR.
Assuntos
Ceco , Omento , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Protectomia , Pontuação de Propensão , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Omento/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Ceco/cirurgia , Protectomia/efeitos adversos , Protectomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most frequent life-threating complication following colorectal surgery. Several attempts have been made to prevent AL. This prospective, randomized, multicentre trial aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nebulised modified cyanoacrylate in preventing AL after rectal surgery. METHODS: Patients submitted to colorectal surgery for carcinoma of the high-medium rectum across five high-volume centres between June 2021 and January 2023 entered the study and were randomized into group A (anastomotic reinforcement with cyanoacrylate) and group B (no reinforcement) and followed up for 30 days. Anastomotic reinforcement was performed via nebulisation of 1 mL of a modified cyanoacrylate glue. Preoperative features and intraoperative and postoperative results were recorded and compared. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID number NCT03941938). RESULTS: Out of 152 patients, 133 (control group, n = 72; cyanoacrylate group, n = 61) completed the follow-up. ALs were detected in nine patients (12.5%) in the control group (four grade B and five grade C) and in four patients (6.6%), in the cyanoacrylate group (three grade B and one grade C); however, despite this trend, the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.36). However, Clavien-Dindo complications grade > 2 were significantly higher in the control group (12.5% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.04). No adverse effects related to the glue application were reported. CONCLUSION: The role of modified cyanoacrylate application in AL prevention remains unclear. However its use to seal colorectal anastomoses is safe and could help to reduce severe postoperative complications.
Assuntos
Anastomose Cirúrgica , Fístula Anastomótica , Cianoacrilatos , Reto , Humanos , Fístula Anastomótica/prevenção & controle , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cianoacrilatos/administração & dosagem , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Reto/cirurgia , Adesivos Teciduais/uso terapêutico , Técnicas de Sutura , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Owing to the lack of evidence-based medical studies with large sample sizes, the surgical approach for the radical resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors remains controversial. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the medical records of patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors who underwent radical resection at 17 large tertiary care hospitals in China between January 1, 2010, and April 30, 2022. All patients were divided into laparoscopic and open surgery groups. After propensity score matching to reduce confounders, the postoperative and oncologic outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: We enrolled 174 patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors who underwent radical surgery. After random matching, 124 patients were included in the comparison (62, laparoscopic surgery group; 62, open surgery group). The laparoscopic surgery group had fewer complications (14.5% vs. 35.5%, P = 0.007) and superior relapse-free survival (P = 0.048). Subgroup analysis revealed that the laparoscopic surgery group had fewer complications (10.9% vs. 34.7%, P = 0.004), shorter postoperative hospital stays (9.56 ± 5.21 days vs. 12.31 ± 8.61 days, P = 0.049) and superior relapse-free survival (P = 0.025) in the rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 4 cm subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery was associated with improved postoperative outcomes and oncologic prognosis for patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 4 cm; it can serve as a safe and feasible option for radical surgery of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/mortalidade , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/cirurgia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/mortalidade , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Idoso , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto , China/epidemiologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
PURPOSE: This current study attempted to investigate whether one-stitch method (OM) of temporary ileostomy influenced the stoma-related complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection (LLAR). METHODS: We searched for eligible studies in four databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI from inception to July 20, 2023. Both surgical outcomes and stoma-related complications were compared between the OM group and the traditional method (TM) group. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was adopted for quality assessment. RevMan 5.4 was conducted for data analyzing. RESULTS: Totally 590 patients from six studies were enrolled in this study (272 patients in the OM group and 318 patients in the TM group). No significant difference was found in baseline information (P > 0.05). Patients in the OM group had shorter operative time in both the primary LLAR surgery (MD = - 17.73, 95%CI = - 25.65 to - 9.80, P < 0.01) and the stoma reversal surgery (MD = - 18.70, 95%CI = - 22.48 to -14.92, P < 0.01) than patients in the TM group. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss of the primary LLAR surgery (MD = - 2.92, 95%CI = - 7.15 to 1.32, P = 0.18). Moreover, patients in the OM group had fewer stoma-related complications than patients in the TM group (OR = 0.55, 95%CI = 0.38 to 0.79, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The OM group had shorter operation time in both the primary LLAR surgery and the stoma reversal surgery than the TM group. Moreover, the OM group had less stoma-related complications.
Assuntos
Ileostomia , Laparoscopia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Ileostomia/efeitos adversos , Ileostomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estomas Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Duração da Cirurgia , Feminino , MasculinoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Increasing importance has been attributed in recent years to the preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerves during rectal resection to achieve better functional results. In addition to improved surgical techniques, intraoperative neuromonitoring may be useful. METHODS: This single-arm prospective study included 30 patients who underwent rectal resection performed with intraoperative neuromonitoring by recording the change in the tissue impedance of the urinary bladder and rectum after stimulation of the pelvic autonomic nerves. The International Prostate Symptom Score, the post-void residual urine volume and the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score (LARS score) were assessed during the 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: A stimulation-induced change in tissue impedance was observed in 28/30 patients (93.3%). In the presence of risk factors such as low anastomosis, neoadjuvant radiotherapy and a deviation stoma, an average increase of the LARS score by 9 points was observed 12 months after surgery (p = 0,04). The function of the urinary bladder remained unaffected in the first week (p = 0,7) as well as 12 months after the procedure (p = 0,93). CONCLUSION: The clinical feasibility of the new method for pelvic intraoperative neuromonitoring could be verified. The benefits of intraoperative pelvic neuromonitoring were particularly evident in difficult intraoperative situations with challenging visualization of the pelvic nerves.
Assuntos
Impedância Elétrica , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Bexiga Urinária/inervação , Bexiga Urinária/fisiopatologia , Pelve/inervação , Monitorização Neurofisiológica Intraoperatória/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Reto/cirurgia , Reto/inervação , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Vias Autônomas , Protectomia/efeitos adversosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Survival comparisons among patients with liver metastases from pancreatic and rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) were limited, and the efficacy of observation rules in patients undergoing hepatectomy for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELMs) was unknown. This study aims to distinguish these characteristics and clarify the effects of the observation rules on NELMs. METHODS: Clinical data were separately collected from patients with pancreatic and rectal NELMs at medical centers in both Japan and China. The Japanese cohort followed the observation rules for the resection of NELMs. A comparative analysis was conducted on clinical characteristics and prognosis features such as overall survival time (OS) and disease-free survival interval (DFS-I). RESULTS: Enrollment included 47 and 34 patients from Japan and China, respectively. Of these, 69 and 12 patients had tumors originating from the pancreas and rectum, respectively. The OS time in patients undergoing primary tumor resection was significantly longer; however, the OS time between the patients undergoing and not undergoing radical resection of liver metastasis was the same. In asynchronous NELMs, patients with rectal (R)-NELMs showed a significantly higher proportion of type III NELMs. Additionally, the median DFS-I of asynchronous R-NELMs was longer than the recommended follow-up time, with 71.4% of them classified as G2. In the Japanese cohort, patients who adhered to the observation rules exhibited a longer median DFS after hepatectomy for NELMs compared with their counterparts. CONCLUSION: Although curative surgery is crucial for primary lesions, personalized approaches are required to manage NELMs. Extended overall follow-ups and shortened follow-up intervals are recommended for G2 stage rectal NETs. The observation rules for NELMs require further validation with a larger sample size.
Assuntos
Hepatectomia , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Tumores Neuroendócrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/cirurgia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Hepatectomia/mortalidade , Hepatectomia/métodos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Prognóstico , Idoso , Seguimentos , Japão/epidemiologia , Adulto , China/epidemiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosAssuntos
Excisão de Linfonodo , Metástase Linfática , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/mortalidade , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Masculino , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Feminino , Análise de Sobrevida , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The quality of the total mesorectal excision specimen in rectal cancer surgery is assessed with a three-tier grade (mesorectal, intramesorectal and muscularis propria). This study aimed to analyse the prognostic impact of the total mesorectal excision grade on survival, and to identify risk factors for intramesorectal and muscularis propria resection in a population-based setting. METHODS: All patients in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry with rectal cancer stage I-III ≤ 10 cm from the anal verge, diagnosed 2015-2019, undergoing total mesorectal excision were analysed. Clinical, surgical and pathological data were retrieved and analysed for the following primary outcomes: local and distant recurrence and overall and relative survival; secondary outcomes were risk factors for total mesorectal excision grading (intramesorectal or muscularis propria resection). Of note, postoperative death < 30 days or recurrence within 90 days were exclusion criteria for survival and recurrence analysis. Recurrence-free patients with less than 3 years follow-up, and patients lacking data regarding recurrence, were also excluded from recurrence analyses. RESULTS: Overall, of 7979 patients treated during the study interval, 1499 patients were eligible for recurrence, 2441 patients for survival and 2476 patients for risk-factor analyses, of which 75% were graded mesorectal, 17% intramesorectal and 8% muscularis propria. Median follow-up for survival was 42 (1-77) months. The worst total mesorectal excision grading (muscularis propria resection) was an independent risk factor for local recurrence in multivariable analysis (HR 2.73, 95% c.i. 1.07 to 7.0, P = 0.036). Total mesorectal excision grade had no impact on distant recurrence or survival. Female sex, tumour level <5 cm, abdominoperineal resection, minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic and robotic), high blood loss, long duration of surgery and intraoperative perforation were independent risk factors for worse total mesorectal excision grading (intramesorectal and/or muscularis propria resection) in multivariable analyses. CONCLUSION: Muscularis propria resection increases the risk of local recurrence but does not seem to affect distant recurrence or survival.
Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Suécia , Fatores de Risco , Sistema de Registros , Reto/cirurgia , Reto/patologia , Protectomia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos de Coortes , PrognósticoRESUMO
Prognostic factors for local recurrence in patients with rectal cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision. BACKGROUND: The standard curative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer of the middle and lower thirds is long-course chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision. PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic factors associated with local recurrence in patients with rectal cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision. METHODS: Retrospective study including patients with rectal cancer T3-4N0M0 or T (any)N + M0 located within 10 cm from the anal border, or patients with T2N0M0 located within 5 cm, treated by long course chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision with curative intent. Clinical, demographic, radiologic, surgical, and anatomopathological data were collected. Local recurrence was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier function, and risk was estimated according to each characteristic using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: 270 patients were included, 57.8% male and mean age 61.7 (30â88) years. At initial staging, 6.7% of patients were stage I, 21.5% stage II, and 71.8% stage III. Open surgery was performed in 65.2%, with sphincter preservation in 78.1%. Mortality within 30 postoperative days was 0.7%. After 49.4 (0.5â86.1) months of median follow-up, overall and local recurrences were 26.3% and 5.9%. On multivariate analyses, local recurrence was associated with involvement of the mesorectal fascia on restaging MRI (HR = 9.11, p = 0.001) and with pathologic involvement of radial surgical margin (HR = 8.19, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Local recurrence of rectal cancer treated with long-course chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision is low and is associated with pathologic involvement of the radial surgical margin and can be predicted on restaging MRI.
Assuntos
Terapia Neoadjuvante , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Adulto , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Prognóstico , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Quimiorradioterapia , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although endoscopic resection is an effective treatment of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (R-NENs) with low malignant potential, there is no consensus on the most recommended endoscopic method. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and acceptability of different endoscopic treatments for R-NENs with low malignant potential. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched databases for studies on treatments of R-NENs using endoscopic resection. These studies comprised techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), modified endoscopic mucosal resection (EMRM), modified endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESDM), and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). The primary outcomes assessed were histological complete resection (HCR). RESULTS: Overall, 38 retrospective studies (3040 R-NENs) were identified. Endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap (EMRC), endoscopic mucosal resection with ligation (EMRL), ESD, ESDM, and TEM demonstrated higher resectability than did EMR in achieving HCR. Endoscopic mucosal resection, EMRC, EMRL, EMRP, EMRD, and EMRU required shorter operation times than did ESD. Endoscopic mucosal resection, EMRC, ESDM, and TEM incurred lower risks than did ESD. CONCLUSION: Regarding R-NENs <20 mm with low malignant potential, ESD could be used as the primary treatment. However, TEM may be more effective if supported by economic conditions and hospital facility. With respect to R-NENs <16 mm with low malignant potential, EMRL could be used as the primary treatment. In regard to R-NENs <10 mm with low malignant potential, EMRL, EMRC, and ESD could be used as the primary treatment. However, EMRL and EMRC might be better when operational difficulties and economic conditions were considered.
Assuntos
Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa , Tumores Neuroendócrinos , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/cirurgia , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Metanálise em Rede , Microcirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , IdosoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Concerns exist regarding the potential for transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) to yield poorer functional outcomes compared to laparoscopic TME (LaTME). The aim of this study is to assess the functional outcomes following taTME and LaTME, focusing on bowel, anorectal, and urogenital disorders and their impact on the patient's QoL. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and A Measurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. The variables considered are: Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Jorge-Wexner scales; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C29 and QLQ-C30 scales. RESULTS: Eleven studies involving 1020 patients (497-taTME group/ 523-LaTME group) were included. There was no significant difference between the treatments in terms of anorectal function: LARS (MD: 2.81, 95% CI: - 2.45-8.08, p = 0.3; I2 = 97%); Jorge-Wexner scale (MD: -1.3, 95% CI: -3.22-0.62, p = 0.19). EORTC QLQ C30/29 scores were similar between the groups. No significant differences were reported in terms of urogenital function: IPSS (MD: 0.0, 95% CI: - 1.49-1.49, p = 0.99; I2 = 72%). CONCLUSIONS: This review supports previous findings indicating that functional outcomes and QoL are similar for rectal cancer patients who underwent taTME or LaTME. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and understand the long-term impact of the functional sequelae of these surgical approaches.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Reto/cirurgia , Reto/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Canal Anal/fisiopatologia , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal , FemininoRESUMO
AIM: To investigate the impact of preoperative cardiovascular disease on the perioperative period of rectal cancer patients over 75 years old. METHODS: The clinicopathological data of 625 elderly patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent radical rectal cancer surgery in the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and affiliated Heji Hospital of Changzhi Medical College from January 2011 to December 2022 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. According to preoperative comorbidities, all patients were divided into cardiovascular disease group (n = 361) and non-cardiovascular disease group (n = 264). One hundred and ninety-two pairs were selected from each group through Propensity score-matched to further analysis. Perioperative indexes and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinicopathological data between the two groups (P > 0.05). The proportion of elderly patients with cardiovascular disease who went to ICU after radical surgery was significantly higher than those without cardiovascular disease (19.3% vs. 10.4%, P = 0.015). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the time to first flatus (3.0 vs. 3.5 days, P = 0.332) and postoperative hospital stay (11.3 vs. 10.5 days, P = 0.297). One patient in the cardiovascular disease group died due to pulmonary embolism. A total of 100 patients (26.0%) developed postoperative complications, and the incidence of overall complications (30.7% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.036) and grade 3-5 complications (12.5% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.036) in the cardiovascular disease group was significantly higher than that in the non-cardiovascular disease group. In terms of gastrointestinal disorders, the incidence of anastomotic leakage (6.8% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.026) in elderly patients with cardiovascular diseases was significantly higher than that in patients without cardiovascular disease. In addition, the incidence of cardiac disorders (8.3% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.014) in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease was significantly higher. CONCLUSION: Elderly rectal cancer patients over 75 years old with cardiovascular disease are more likely to develop severe complications after radical surgery, especially anastomotic leakage and cardiac disorders.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Período Perioperatório , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Masculino , Idoso , Feminino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pontuação de Propensão , Fatores de Risco , ComorbidadeRESUMO
The surgical-oncological treatment of pelvic and perineal malignancies is associated with a high complication rate and morbidity for patients. Modern multimodal treatment modalities, such as neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy for anal or rectal cancer, increase the long-term survival rate while reducing the risk of local recurrence. Simultaneously, the increasing surgical radicality and higher oncological safety with wide resection margins is inevitably associated with larger and, due to radiation, more complex tissue defects in the perineal and sacral parts of the pelvic floor. Therefore, the plastic-surgical reconstruction of complex pelvic-perineal defects following oncological resection remains challenging. The reconstructive armamentarium, and thus the treatment of such defects, is broad and ranges from local, regional and muscle-based flaps to microvascular and perforator-based procedures. While the use of flaps is associated with a significant, well-documented reduction in postoperative complications compared to primary closure, there is still a lack of reliable data directly comparing the postoperative results of different reconstructive approaches. Additionaly, the current data shows that the quality of life of these patients is rarely recorded in a standardised manner. In a consensus workshop at the 44th annual meeting of the German-speaking Association for Microsurgery on the topic of "Reconstruction of oncological defects in the pelvic-perineal area", the current literature was discussed and recommendations for the reconstruction of complex defects in this area were developed. The aim of this workshop was to identify knowledge gaps and establish an expert consensus to ensure and continuously improve the quality of reconstruction in this challenging area. In addition, the importance of the "patient-reported outcome measures" in pelvic reconstruction was highlighted, and the commitment to its widespread use in the era of value-based healthcare was affirmed.
Assuntos
Períneo , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Humanos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Períneo/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pélvicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/cirurgia , Terapia Combinada , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , MicrocirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Incontinence is not rare after rectal cancer surgery. Platelet-rich plasma may promote tissue repair and generation but has never been tested for the treatment of anal incontinence. This study evaluated the impact of platelet-rich plasma injection on the severity of incontinence and quality of life after low rectal cancer surgery. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort proof of concept study in a colorectal cancer institution. Patients had undergone low anterior or intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer and had a Wexner score > 4. Ten milliliters of platelet-rich plasma were injected into the internal and external sphincters under endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) guidance. Primary outcome measure was > 2 point improvement in Wexner score (improved group). The patients were assessed with endo-anal ultrasound examination, manometry, the Wexner Questionnaire and SF-36 Health Surveys, and patients were asked whether they used pads and antidiarrheal medications before and 6 months after PRP injection. RESULTS: Of 20 patients included in the study, 14 (70%) were men, and the average age was 56.8 (SD = 9.5) years. No statistically significant difference was found in Wexner scores before and after PRP injection (p = 0.66). Seven (35%) patients experienced a > 2 point improvement in Wexner score. Rectal manometry demonstrated improved squeezing pressure (p = 0.0096). Furthermore, physical functioning scoring (p = 0.023), role limitation (p = 0.016), emotional well-being (p = 0.0057) and social functioning (p = 0.043) domains on the SF-36 questionnaire improved. One (5%) and three (15%) patients stopped using pads and antidiarrheal medications. CONCLUSION: Platelet-rich plasma injection does not restore Wexner scores, but more than one-third of patients may benefit from this application with an improvement of > 2 points in their scores. Platelet-rich plasma injection may improve squeezing pressure and certain life quality measures for incontinent patients after rectal cancer surgery.
Assuntos
Canal Anal , Incontinência Fecal , Manometria , Plasma Rico em Plaquetas , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Incontinência Fecal/etiologia , Incontinência Fecal/terapia , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Idoso , Resultado do Tratamento , Endossonografia/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Protectomia/métodos , Protectomia/efeitos adversos , Adulto , InjeçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME), a novel approach for treating low rectal cancer, holds promise. However, concerns exist in certain countries about their oncologic safety due to less-than-optimal outcomes on global studies. This research seeks to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes focusing on local recurrence rate and overall survival after TaTME surgery in Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study analyzed data from patients who underwent elective TaTME surgery between 2014 and 2021 in four certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany. Primary endpoints were 3-year local recurrence rate and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Secondary outcomes encompassed overall survival (OS), operative time, completeness of local tumor resection, lymph node resection, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 378 patients were analyzed (mean age 61.6 years; 272 males, 72%). After a median follow-up period of 2.5 years, 326 patients with UICC-stages I-III and tumor operability included in survival analyses. Local recurrence was observed in 8 individuals, leading to a 3-year cumulative local recurrence rate of 2.2% and a 3-year LRFS rate of 88.1%. The 3-year OS rate stood at 88.9%. Within 30 days after surgery, anastomotic leakage occurred in 19 cases (5%), whereas a presacral abscess was present in 12 patients (3.2%). CONCLUSION: TaTME proves effective in addressing the anatomical and technical challenges of low rectal surgery and is associated with pleasing short- and long-term results. However, its safe integration into surgical routine necessitates sufficient knowledge and a previously completed training program.
Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alemanha , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso , Fatores de Tempo , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Certificação , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Reto/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , AdultoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to develop a nomogram for the personalized prediction of postoperative complication risks in patients with middle and low rectal cancer who are undergoing transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME). This tool aims to assist clinicians in early identification of high-risk patients and in addressing preoperative risk factors to enhance surgical safety. METHODS: In this case-control study, 207 patients diagnosed with middle and low rectal cancer and undergoing taTME between February 2018 and November 2023 at The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University were included. Independent risk factors for postoperative complications were analyzed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and multifactorial logistic regression models. A predictive nomogram was constructed using R Studio. RESULTS: Among the 207 patients, 57 (27.5%) experienced postoperative complications. The LASSO and multifactorial logistic regression analyses identified operation time (OR = 1.010, P = 0.007), smoking history (OR = 9.693, P < 0.001), anastomotic technique (OR = 0.260, P = 0.004), and ASA score (OR = 9.077, P = 0.051) as significant predictors. These factors were integrated into the nomogram. The model's accuracy was validated through receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, consistency indices, and decision curve analysis. CONCLUSION: The developed nomogram, incorporating operation time, smoking history, anastomotic technique, and ASA score, effectively forecasts postoperative complication risks in taTME procedures. It is a valuable tool for clinicians to identify patients at heightened risk and initiate timely interventions, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Assuntos
Nomogramas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Idoso , Modelos Logísticos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Curva ROC , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diverting colostomy followed by neoadjuvant treatment is a treatment of choice for obstructive rectal cancer. Such patients may be treated via a robotic approach with several advantages over conventional laparoscopic surgery. Conversely, the existing stoma may interfere with the optimal trocar position and thus affect the quality of robotic surgery. Moreover, the console surgeon does not face the patient, which may endanger the stoma. METHODS: Patients with rectal cancer who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery were retrospectively investigated using a robotic platform after neoadjuvant treatment at our hospital. Based on pretreatment stoma creation, patients were divided into the NS (those without a stoma) and S groups (patients with a stoma). Baseline characteristics, types of neoadjuvant treatment, short-term surgical outcomes, postoperative anorectal manometric data, and survival were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The NS and S groups comprised 65 and 9 patients, respectively. Conversion to laparotomy was required in three patients in the NS group. The S group required a longer console time than the NS group (median: 367 vs. 253 min, respectively, p = 0.038); however, no difference was observed in the total operative time (p = 0.15) and blood loss (p = 0.70). Postoperative complication rates, anorectal function, and oncological outcomes were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although console time was longer in patients with a stoma, robotic surgery could be performed safely like in those without a stoma after neoadjuvant treatment.
Assuntos
Canal Anal , Colostomia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão , Neoplasias Retais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Colostomia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Needlescopic surgery is a minimally invasive procedure that uses thin trocars with 3-mm diameter. We used Turnbull-Cutait pull-through and delayed coloanal anastomosis in needlescopic surgery to avoid diverting ileostomy during intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. In this study, we aim to assess the diverting ileostomy avoidance rate and technical safety of this "minimal skin incision and no stoma" procedure. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study was conducted at the Cancer Institute Hospital, a tertiary referral center in Japan. Between January 2017 and December 2020, 11 patients underwent needlescopic intersphincteric resection with diverting ileostomy (NSI group), and 19 patients underwent needlescopic intersphincteric resection with delayed coloanal anastomosis (NSD group) for low rectal cancer. Data regarding patient backgrounds and short-term outcomes, including diverting ileostomy avoidance rate, pathological results, and postoperative defecatory function, were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the NSI and NSD groups with respect to patient background, operation time (239 min versus 220 min, p = 0.68), estimated blood loss (45 g versus 25 g, p = 0.29), R0 resection rate (100% versus 100%, p = 1.00), and length of postoperative hospital stay (16 days versus 17 days, p = 0.42). The diverting ileostomy avoidance rate was 94.4% in the NSD group. The LARS and Wexner scores 12 months after surgery were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Needlescopic intersphincteric resection and delayed coloanal anastomosis can be safely performed in selected patients with a high rate of diverting ileostomy avoidance and comparable short-term outcomes.