A hiatus in the rivalry between Pierre Marie and Jules Dejerine: a collaborative study on sensory disorders by Andre Pierre Marie and Gustave Roussy.

Personal and professional rivalries involving prominent neurologists mark the history of nineteenth-century French neurology. One of the great examples is the feud between Pierre Marie and Jules Dejerine. The dispute between the two, nevertheless, did not prevent Pierre Marie's son, André Marie, and Gustave Roussy - one of Dejerine's favorite pupils, from collaborating on significant research that led to the doctoral dissertation by Andre Marie regarding sensory disturbances associated with painful hemiagnosia found in thalamic lesions.

As rivalidades pessoais e profissionais entre neurologistas proeminentes marcaram a história da neurologia francesa do século XIX. Um dos grandes exemplos é a rivalidade entre Pierre Marie e Jules Dejerine. A disputa entre os dois, no entanto, não impediu que o filho de Pierre Marie, André Marie, e Gustave Roussy, um dos pupilos preferidos de Dejerine, colaborassem numa investigação significativa que resultou na tese de doutorado de André Marie sobre os distúrbios sensoriais associados à hemiagnosia dolorosa encontrada nas lesões talâmicas.

Forensic Neurology and the Role of Neurologists in Forensic Evaluations.

Forensic psychiatrists may be asked to opine on neurological evidence or neurological diseases outside the scope of their expertise. This article discusses the value of involving experts trained in behavioral neurology in such cases. First, we describe the field of behavioral neurology and neuropsychiatry, the subspecialty available to both neurologists and psychiatrists focused on the behavioral, cognitive, and neuropsychiatric manifestations of neurological diseases. Next, we discuss the added value of behavioral neurologists in forensic cases, including assisting in the diagnostic evaluation for complex neuropsychiatric diseases, using expertise in localization to provide a strong scientific basis for linking neurodiagnostic testing to relevant neuropsychiatric symptoms, and assisting in relating these symptoms to the relevant legal question in cases where such symptoms may be less familiar to forensic psychiatrists, such as frontal lobe syndromes. We discuss approaches to integrating behavioral neurology with forensic psychiatry, highlighting the need for collaboration and mentorship between disciplines. Finally, we discuss several forensic cases highlighting the additional value of experts trained in behavioral neurology. We conclude that forensic psychiatrists should involve behavioral neurology experts when encountering neurological evidence that falls outside their scope of expertise, and the need for further cross-disciplinary collaboration and training.

Forensic Neurology and the Role of Neurologists in Forensic Evaluations.

There is a clear need for experts with the requisite knowledge and experience to offer medicolegal opinions pertaining to various neuropsychiatric conditions. There is also an important distinction between clinical and medicolegal roles, and the need for training and expertise applicable to forensic assessment. But there remain few available experts with credentials spanning neuropsychiatry and forensic assessment. This creates a dilemma whereby parties involved in litigation featuring neuropsychiatric illness or injury are frequently forced to choose between experts with either knowledge and skills applicable to neuropsychiatric conditions or experts with skills and experience applicable to forensic assessment. Either choice introduces risk. Whether flawed medicolegal opinions are a consequence of deficient medical knowledge or an inadequate forensic evaluation process, the result remains the same, with triers of fact potentially being exposed to problematic testimony. There is, however, a more fundamental problem that implicates patient care more broadly: spurious dichotomies created by the historical segregation of psychiatry and neurology. Optimizing clinical care for patients with neuropsychiatric conditions, improving medical education in support of such care, and enabling forensic neuropsychiatric assessment must then start with more proactive efforts to reintegrate psychiatry and neurology.

Perceptions and attitudes regarding complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine among published neurology authors: a large-scale, international cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: While many patients with neurological disorders and conditions use complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine (CAIM), little is known about the use, perceptions, and attitudes regarding CAIM among published neurology authors. With the increasing popularity of CAIM, our objective was to assess practices, perceptions, and attitudes towards CAIM among published neurology authors. METHODS: We conducted an anonymous online survey of authors who had published articles in neurology journals indexed in MEDLINE. We emailed potential participants our cross-sectional electronic survey after extracting their email addresses from one of their publications in our sample of journals. Basic descriptive statistics were drawn from quantitative data, and thematic content analysis was used to analyse qualitative data from any open-ended questions. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 783 published neurology authors (1.7% response rate, 83.9% completion rate). Overall, respondents perceived CAIM to be promising in preventing, treating, and/or managing neurological diseases. Mind-body therapies received the most positive responses, indicated by over half of respondents cumulatively agreeing that they are promising (n = 368, 59.0%) and safe (n = 280, 50.3%). Whole medical systems and biofield therapy were less favourable. Most neurology clinicians reported a lack of formal (n = 211, 70.3%) and supplementary training (n = 158, 52.5%) on CAIM. Nearly half of clinicians did not feel comfortable counselling patients about CAIM therapies (n = 121, 44.5%), and over half did not feel comfortable recommending them (n = 161, 59.3%). A lack of scientific evidence for CAIM's safety and efficacy was reported as the greatest challenge to CAIM (n = 515, 92.5%). The majority of respondents believed there is value to conducting research on this topic (n = 461, 82.0%) and supported increasing allocation of research funding towards CAIM (n = 241, 58.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Although many participants found CAIM to be promising to the field of neurology, the vast majority did not feel open to integrating CAIM into mainstream medical practices on account of a perceived lack of scientific evidence for its safety and efficacy. Future studies can use our findings to gather more detailed insights, improve educational resources on CAIM within neurology, as well as examine what effects a tailored CAIM education has on the perceptions and attitudes of published neurology authors towards CAIM.

Performance Metrics, Algorithms, and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Vascular and Interventional Neurology: A Review of Basic Elements.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is currently being used as a routine tool for day-to-day activity. Medicine is not an exception to the growing usage of AI in various scientific fields. Vascular and interventional neurology deal with diseases that require early diagnosis and appropriate intervention, which are crucial to saving patients' lives. In these settings, AI can be an extra pair of hands for physicians or in conditions where there is a shortage of clinical experts. In this article, the authors have reviewed the common metrics used in interpreting the performance of models and common algorithms used in this field.

The Role of the Vascular Neurologist in Optimizing Stroke Care.

The article summarizes the training pathways and vocational opportunities within the field of vascular neurology. It highlights the groundbreaking clinical trials that transformed acute stroke care and the resultant increased demand for readily available vascular neurology expertise. The article emphasizes the need to train a larger number of diverse physicians in the subspecialty and the role of vascular neurologists in improving outcomes across demographic and geographic lines.

[Evaluation of the management of hypertension among stroke patients in a neurology department of Côte d'Ivoire]. / Évaluation de la prise en charge de l'hypertension artérielle après un accident vasculaire cérébral dans un service de neurologie en Côte-d'Ivoire.

Introduction: Reducing blood pressure after stroke is important to prevent recurrent stroke, but we have no data about the control of blood pressure in our context. The purpose of this study was to assess management of hypertension among post-stroke patients in a neurology department. Method: It was a retrospective study involving hypertensive stroke patients. They were followed up at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge. Results: 141 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 61 years. Almost all patients (94.3%) received a dual antihypertensive therapy combining mainly an ACE inhibitor and a diuretic (70.2%). During follow-up, only 76 patients were assessed at M1, 50 at M3, 44 at M6 and 42 at M12. The average monthly cost of antihypertensive treatment was 13,771 CFA francs (21 euros). Non-adherence to antihypertensive medication were mostly noted in widows, patients without occupation, those with low education and no health insurance. At one year, blood pressure was controlled in 80% of the 42 patients still present. Non-control of blood pressure was related to poor therapeutic compliance (p<0.05). Conclusion: This study highlights follow-up issues in hypertensive post-stroke patients with a high number of lost to follow-up. Blood pressure was controlled in patients who were regularly followed and adherent to antihypertensive treatment.

Tourette Syndrome: A Catalyst for Operationalizing Neurodiversity.

Our goal, taking Tourette syndrome as a case example, is to introduce neurologists to, and motivate discussion on, the neurodiversity paradigm. This philosophical construct considers some neurologic conditions in diversity, instead of simply disease. Moving from philosophical idea to empirical construct draws from patient and family perspectives on (1) quality of life and discrimination, (2) disability pride, and (3) unique profiles of different patient cohorts. Listening to patient voices, attending to family, advocacy group, and societal views on neurologic disorders can strengthen precision neurology practice. Dialogs on neurodiversity, including antitherapy sentiments, offer to enhance neurologic care, patient agency, and autonomy; encourage respectful communications with patients who challenge the idea their condition is pathologic; and to set the stage for future empirical investigations and practice guidelines.

Perspectives from neuro-oncology providers on patient access to electronic records: a survey study.

Aim: To evaluate the neuro-oncology providers' experience with patient online access to electronic records. Methods: Cross-sectional survey for physicians and advanced care providers within the field of neuro-oncology in the USA. Results: 65 providers completed the survey, from all major regions of the USA. 58% reported that at least once per month, patients contacted them outside of an office visit about provider notes or a laboratory or imaging finding accessed online. 54% of providers did not think that all laboratory results should be released automatically, and only 25% of providers thought that all radiology reads should be released immediately. 97% thought that some patients suffered substantial distress viewing test results prior to appointments. Qualitative responses aligned with the quantitative results. Conclusion: Most neuro-oncology providers are concerned about the immediate release of laboratory and imaging findings to patients without guidance.

Prior studies had investigated the perspectives of medical providers on patients having immediate access to medical records. However, almost none of them focus on neuro-oncology. In our study, we distributed a survey electronically to neuro-oncology providers across the USA to seek their perspectives. Our results show that most neuro-oncology providers found patients having immediate access to their records to be useful. However, they raised concerns about the immediate release of laboratory and imaging findings to patients without guidance. Our study also included free responses from the neuro-oncology providers that could help mitigate this concern.