RESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe the long-term effects of an ASP among febrile neutropenia (FN) patients. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study was conducted between 2015 and 2023 at a tertiary care hospital in Istanbul, Türkiye. The ASP was implemented for FN patients, and the effects were assessed before and after the ASP interventions, which included FN clinical pathways and regular multi-disciplinary meetings with relevant healthcare workers. RESULTS: A total of 489 FN episodes of 290 patients were included, 42% were female, and the mean age was 56 years (SD: 15, range: 18-89 years). After the intervention, the rate of appropriate antimicrobial therapy at the levels of starting (p = 0.005), switching (p < 0.001), and de-escalation/discontinuation, (p < 0.001) significantly increased. Another positive impact of the ASP was a significant reduction in candidemia (from 4.88 to 0.74, p = 0.004), as well as a significant reduction in the 90-day mortality rate (from 19 to 5%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, having a gram-negative bloodstream infection, prolonged days with fever, and a high risk for neutropenia were found to be significant predictors of 90-day mortality, while follow-up with ASP significantly reduced mortality. CONCLUSION: Implementation of ASP led to reduced candidemia and LOS without increasing mortality, even in a country with a high rate of antimicrobial resistance. Implementation of sustainable ASP for FN patients is critical in combating antimicrobial resistance.
Assuntos
Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Neutropenia Febril , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Idoso , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Adolescente , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto Jovem , Turquia , Seguimentos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Candidemia/tratamento farmacológico , Candidemia/mortalidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic overuse leads to the emergence of antibiotic resistance that threatens immunocompromised cancer patients. Infections caused by MDR Gram-negative pathogens are difficult to treat and associated with high mortality. Hence, empirical therapy with standard-of-care (SOC) antibiotics could be suboptimal in these vulnerable patients. New antibiotics covering potential resistant pathogens may be considered. METHODS: We conducted a randomized non-inferiority study comparing safety and efficacy of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IPM/REL), a ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination, with SOC antibiotics (cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem) in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. Patients received at least 48 h of IV antibiotics and were assessed at end-of-IV (EOIV) therapy, test of cure (TOC; Days 21-28), and late follow-up (LFU; Days 35-42). RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were enrolled (49 IPM/REL and 50 SOC). Demographics and rates of documented microbiological infections were similar in both groups. In the SOC arm, 86% of antibiotics consisted of cefepime. Patients on IPM/REL had a higher favourable clinical response at EOIV than those on SOC (90% versus 74%; Pâ=â0.042); however, responses were similar at TOC and LFU. Microbiological eradication was comparable at all three timepoints. Study drug-related adverse events and adverse events leading to drug discontinuation were similar in both groups, with no study drug-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that compared with SOC antibiotics, predominantly cefepime, IPM/REL for empirical coverage of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients is generally safe and could be associated with a better clinical outcome at EOIV. The current SOC consisting mainly of agents that do not cover for ESBL-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bacteria should be reconsidered.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Compostos Azabicíclicos , Combinação Imipenem e Cilastatina , Neutropenia Febril , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Neoplasias , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Combinação Imipenem e Cilastatina/uso terapêutico , Compostos Azabicíclicos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Azabicíclicos/efeitos adversos , Compostos Azabicíclicos/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Imipenem/uso terapêutico , Imipenem/efeitos adversos , Imipenem/administração & dosagem , Padrão de Cuidado , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Cilastatina/uso terapêutico , Cilastatina/efeitos adversos , Cilastatina/administração & dosagem , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study aims to investigate the early kinetics of interleukin 6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) on initial antibiotic efficacy in hematological disorder patients with febrile neutropenia (FN). METHODS: A total of 40 patients with 43 episodes of FN were enrolled and divided into initial antibiotic effective group (IAE group, n = 24) and initial antibiotic ineffective group (IAI group, n = 19). The levels of IL-6, PCT, and CRP before antibacterial treatment (T0), and 12 h (T1), 24 h (T2), 48 h (T3), and 72 h (T4) post-antibacterial treatment were determined, respectively. Furthermore, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical value of indicators. RESULTS: In IAE group, the IL-6 levels gradually decreased from T0 to T4, and the CRP levels significantly decreased at 48 to 72 h, whereas both IL-6 and CRP remained at high levels in the IAI group. The PCT levels in both groups increased at the early stage of anti-infection (T1-T2) and reached to peak at T1-T2 in effective group. ROC curve analysis identified IL-6 as a predictive biomarker for initial antibiotic efficacy at 12, 48, and 72 h after treatment, with the AUC of 0.698, 0.744, and 0.821, respectively. In addition, CRP demonstrated predictive ability of initial antibiotics against infection at 24, 48, and 72 h after therapy, with the AUC of 0.724, 0.741, and 0.797, respectively. ROC curve analysis of percentage changes demonstrated that IL-6 percentage change showed predictive ability of antibiotic efficacy at the early stage, and both the IL-6 and CRP percentage changes showed the predictive ability of antibiotic efficacy 48 or 72 h after antibiotics therapy. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed IL-6 and CRP levels, and the percentage change in IL-6 as the biomarkers for initial antibiotic efficacy prediction in hematological disorder patients with FN.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reativa , Neutropenia Febril , Interleucina-6 , Pró-Calcitonina , Humanos , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , Interleucina-6/sangue , Pró-Calcitonina/sangue , Masculino , Feminino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/sangue , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangue , Curva ROC , Idoso , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
This pilot study examined differences in wait times for oncology patients who presented to the emergency department, with or without a Fast Pass, for febrile neutropenia (FN). Inadequate circulating neutrophils create a health risk for FN patients. An increased number of patients are receiving chemotherapy in an outpatient setting and may experience delays when seeking treatment in the emergency department. These delays in treatment may be due to overcrowding, patients who require life-saving medical interventions, and inconsistencies in recognizing febrile neutropenia, where fever may be the only presenting sign. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact on wait times, increasing possible risk of bacterial or viral exposure in the emergency department waiting room, for patients with a potential diagnosis of FN who presented their "Fast Pass" from the hospital cancer center's program upon arrival. Electronic medical records were reviewed over a period of 21 months, comparing wait times in the ED for oncology patients with potential FN before and after implementation of the Fast Pass program at an urban medical center in Hawai'i. Of the 1300 oncology patient chart reviews conducted, 6 patients met the study-defined inclusion criteria pre-Fast Pass and 10 met the study-defined inclusion criteria post-Fast Pass. Influence of the use of a Fast Pass on patient wait times was tested using a multivariate regression adjusted for ED patient volume. There were no differences in overall wait times pre- and post-Fast Pass.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias , Humanos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Feminino , Masculino , Havaí/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/complicações , Projetos Piloto , Neoplasias/complicações , Idoso , Listas de Espera , Adulto , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Bacteremia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer and episodes of high-risk febrile neutropenia (HRFN). OBJECTIVE: To identify the frequency of microorganisms isolated from blood cultures (BC) and their antimicrobial resistance (R) profile in children with HRFN, compared with the same data from previous studies of the same group. METHOD: Prospective, multicenter, epidemiological surveillance study of microorganisms isolated from BC in patients under 18 years of age, from 7 PINDA network hospitals, between 2016 and 2021. RESULTS: 284 episodes of HRFN with positive BC were analyzed out of 1091 enrolled episodes (26%). Median age 7.2 years [3.0-12.3]. The main isolates were gram-negative bacilli (GNB) 49.2%, gram-positive cocci (GPC) 43.8%, and fungi 3.6%. The most frequently isolated microorganisms were viridans group Streptococci (VGS) (25.8%), Escherichia coli (19.8%), Pseudomonas spp. (11.2%), Klebsiella spp. (10.9%), and coagulase negative Staphylococci (CoNS) (10.9%). There was an increase in R to third-generation cephalosporins (p = 0.011) in GNB and to oxacillin in CoNS (p = 0.00), as well as a decrease in R to amikacin in non-fermenting GNB (p = 0.02) and to penicillin in VGS (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: VGS is the main agent isolated in BC from pediatric patients with cancer and episodes of HRFN, followed by E. coli, Pseudomonas spp., and Klebsiella spp. Having epidemiological surveillance of microorganisms isolated from BC and their antimicrobial R profile is essential to favor the rational use of antimicrobials.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Hemocultura , Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias , Humanos , Criança , Neoplasias/microbiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Pré-Escolar , Neutropenia Febril/microbiologia , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Chile/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Feminino , Masculino , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Adolescente , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: A target trough concentration (Cmin) of teicoplanin ≥ 15-20 mg/L between the fourth and sixth day has been suggested for severe infections or management of febrile neutropenia (FN). Owing to no reports discussing the impact of early target attainment on treatment outcomes, this study aimed to evaluate the dose-Cmin relationship and clinical outcome and estimate the optimal early target Cmin for FN in patients with hematological malignancies. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study enrolled patients with hematological malignancies who were treated with teicoplanin either as an empirical antibiotic for FN or as targeted treatment for Gram-positive bacteria. Blood samples were collected on day three (48 h) post-loading doses, day 5 (96 h), and day 8 (when applicable) and determined by ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography-triple quadruple mass spectrometry. A total of 117 samples from 47 patients with FN (27 men, 20 women) were consecutively analyzed. A two-tailed α value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean Cmin values at 48 h, 96 h, and on day 8 were 23.4, 21.4, and 27.8 mg/L, respectively. The patients achieving Cmin ≥ 20 mg/L at 48 h had a higher likelihood of treatment success. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.71 for clinical efficacy and the cutoff value of Cmin at 48 h was 18.85 mg/L (95% confidence interval 0.55-0.87; P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The Cmin of teicoplanin after completion of loading doses could predict the treatment response, with a target concentration ≥ 18.85 mg/L.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Teicoplanina , Humanos , Teicoplanina/administração & dosagem , Teicoplanina/uso terapêutico , Teicoplanina/farmacocinética , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso , Adulto , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia represents a critical oncologic emergency, and its management is pivotal in cancer therapy. In several guidelines, the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia is not routinely recommended except in high-risk cases. The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology has updated its clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF, incorporating a systematic review to address this clinical question. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted by performing a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web, focusing on publications from January 1990 to December 2019. Selected studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, and cohort and case-control studies. Evaluated outcomes included overall survival, infection-related mortality, hospitalization duration, quality of life, and pain. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 332 records. Following two rounds of screening, two records were selected for both qualitative and quantitative synthesis including meta-analysis. Regarding infection-related mortality, the event to case ratio was 5:134 (3.73%) in the G-CSF group versus 6:129 (4.65%) in the non-G-CSF group, resulting in a relative risk of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-2.58; p = 0.54), which was not statistically significant. Only median values for hospitalization duration were available from the two RCTs, precluding a meta-analysis. For overall survival, quality of life, and pain, no suitable studies were found for analysis, rendering their assessment unfeasible. CONCLUSION: A weak recommendation is made that G-CSF treatment not be administered to patients with febrile neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy. G-CSF treatment can be considered for patients at high risk.
Assuntos
Neutropenia Febril , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos , Humanos , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/uso terapêutico , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicações , Japão , Neutropenia Febril Induzida por Quimioterapia/tratamento farmacológico , Oncologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Two approaches are used to manage invasive fungal disease (IFD) in febrile neutropenic patients viz. empirical therapy (without attempting to confirm the diagnosis), or pre-emptive therapy (after screening tests for IFD). OBJECTIVE: This systematic review was undertaken to compare these approaches in children. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Clinical Trial Registries and grey literature, for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing empirical versus pre-emptive antifungal therapy in children with FN suspected to have IFD. We used the Cochrane Risk of bias 2 tool for quality assessment, and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: We identified 7989 citations. Stepwise screening identified only one relevant RCT that administered empirical (n = 73) or pre-emptive (n = 76) antifungal therapy. There were no significant differences in all-cause mortality (RR 1.56, 95% CI: 0.46, 5.31), IFD mortality (RR 1.04, 95% CI:0.15, 7.20) and other clinically important outcomes such as duration of fever, duration of hospitalization and proportion requiring ICU admission. There were no safety data reported. The number of days of antifungal therapy was significantly lower in the pre-emptive therapy arm. The certainty of evidence for all outcomes was 'moderate'. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review highlighted the paucity of data, comparing empirical versus pre-emptive antifungal therapy in children with febrile neutropenia having suspected invasive fungal disease. Data from a single included trial suggests that both approaches may be comparable in research settings. Robust trials are warranted to address the gap in existing knowledge about the optimal approach in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Antifúngicos , Neutropenia Febril , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas , Criança , Humanos , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Hospitalização , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/prevenção & controleRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To validate the efficacy and safety of withholding antimicrobial therapy in a new cohort of children with cancer and febrile neutropenia (FN) having a demonstrated viral respiratory tract infection. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, noninferiority, randomized study, approved by the ethical committee, in children presenting with FN at seven hospitals in Chile, evaluated at admission for diagnosis of bacterial and viral pathogens. Children who were positive for a respiratory virus, negative for a bacterial pathogen, and had a favourable evolution after 48-72 hours of antimicrobial therapy were randomized to either maintain or withhold antimicrobial therapy. The primary endpoint was the percentage of episodes with an uneventful resolution, whereas the secondary endpoints were days of fever, days of hospitalization, requirement of antimicrobial treatment readministration, sepsis, paediatric intensive care unit admission, and death. RESULTS: A total of 301 of 939 children with FN episodes recruited between March 2021 and December 2023 had a respiratory virus as a unique identified microorganism, of which 139 had a favourable evolution at 48-72 hours and were randomized, 70 to maintain and 69 to withdraw antimicrobial therapy. The median days of antimicrobial therapy was 5 (IQR 3-6) versus 3 (IQR 3-6) days (p < 0.001), with similar frequency of uneventful resolution 66/70 (94%) and 66/69 (96%); relative risk, 1.01; (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.09), absolute risk difference 0.01; (95% CI, -0.05 to 0.08) and similar number of days of fever and days of hospitalization. No cases of sepsis, paediatric intensive care unit admission, or death were reported. DISCUSSION: We validated the strategy of withdrawal antimicrobial therapy in children with FN and viral respiratory tract infection based on clinical and microbiological/molecular diagnostic criteria. This will enable advances in antimicrobial stewardship strategies with a possible future impact on antimicrobial resistance.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Infecções Respiratórias , Viroses , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Prospectivos , Viroses/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicações , Chile , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Lactente , Suspensão de Tratamento , Febre/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Hospitalização , AdolescenteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gram-positive bacteria are frequently resistant to empirical beta-lactams in febrile neutropenic patients with cancer. As microbiology and antibiotic susceptibility changes, we reevaluated the risk factors for resistant Gram-positive bacteremia in febrile neutropenic patients with cancer. METHODS: Episodes of bacteremic febrile neutropenia in Seoul National University Hospital from July 2019 to June 2022 were reviewed. Resistant Gram-positive bacteria were defined as a pathogen susceptible only to glycopeptide or linezolid in vitro (e.g., methicillin-resistant staphylococci, penicillin-resistant viridans streptococci, and ampicillin-resistant enterococci). Episodes were compared to identify independent risk factors for resistant Gram-positive bacteremia. RESULTS: Of 225 episodes, 78 (34.7%) involved resistant Gram-positive bacteremia. Multivariate analysis revealed that breakthrough bacteremia while being administered antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 6.794; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.130-14.749; P < 0.001) and catheter-related infection (aOR 4.039, 95% CI 1.366-11.946; P = 0.012) were associated with resistant Gram-positive bacteremia. Chronic liver disease (aOR 0.231, 95% CI 0.059-0.905; P = 0.035) and hypotension at bacteremia (aOR 0.454, 95% CI 0.218-0.945; P = 0.035) were inversely associated with resistant Gram-positive bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: Resistant Gram-positive bacteria should be considered in breakthrough bacteremia and catheter-related infection in febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Bactérias Gram-Positivas , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas , Neoplasias , Humanos , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/complicações , Masculino , Feminino , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/complicações , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Adulto , Idoso , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/isolamento & purificação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neutropenia Febril/microbiologia , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/complicações , República da Coreia/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/complicações , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Testes de Sensibilidade MicrobianaRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify the patient characteristics of children with febrile neutropenia, the associated bacterial organisms, and their sensitivity patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH) pediatric oncology ward, from June 2021 to April 2022. A total of 110 children who developed fever and neutropenia during chemotherapy were enrolled. Blood samples for culture were collected aseptically. Patient characteristics were presented in frequency tables. Antimicrobial sensitivity patterns were plotted in tables against the bacterial isolates cultured. Chi-square/Fisher's exact test was used to determine any association between patient characteristics, bacterial growth, and antimicrobial sensitivity. RESULTS: The majority (n = 66; 60%) were males. The median age was 6.3 years (standard deviation, 3.7). The majority of patients 71 (64.5%) had hematologic malignancies, the most common being AML. There was a significant association between severity of neutropenia and hematologic malignancies (P = .028). In total, 31/110 (28.2%) blood cultures were positive for bacterial growth. Gram-positive bacteria were more frequent (n = 20; 58.1%). The most common organism was Escherichia coli (n = 6; 18.2%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (n = 5; 15.2%). All the isolates were sensitive to linezolid and vancomycin and also showed good sensitivity toward meropenem (n = 10/11; 90.9%). High resistance to cephalosporins was noted with ceftriaxone (n = 5/6; 83.3%), cefepime (n = 4/7; 57.1%), and ceftazidime (n = 3/4; 75%). CONCLUSION: The most common malignancy associated with febrile neutropenia was AML. Gram-positive bacteria were the most common isolates. There was high resistance to cephalosporins.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Masculino , Criança , Humanos , Feminino , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Estudos Transversais , Quênia , Bacteriemia/complicações , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Cefalosporinas/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/microbiologia , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/epidemiologia , Neutropenia Febril/complicações , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/complicações , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a serious complication in hematologic malignancies, and lung infiltrates (LIs) remain a significant concern. An accurate microbiological diagnosis is crucial but difficult to establish. To address this, we analyzed the utility of a standardized method for performing bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) along with a two-step strategy for the analysis of BAL fluid. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary cancer center from November 2018 to June 2020. Patients age 15 years and older with confirmed leukemia or lymphomas undergoing chemotherapy, with presence of FN, and LIs observed on imaging were enrolled. RESULTS: Among the 122 enrolled patients, successful BAL was performed in 83.6% of cases. The study used a two-step analysis of BAL fluid, resulting in a diagnostic yield of 74.5%. Furthermore, antimicrobial therapy was modified in 63.9% of patients on the basis of BAL reports, and this population demonstrated a higher response rate (63% v 45%; P = .063). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that a two-step BAL fluid analysis is safe and clinically beneficial to establish an accurate microbiological diagnosis. Given the crucial impact of diagnostic delays on mortality in hematologic malignancy patients with FN, early BAL studies should be performed to enable prompt and specific diagnosis, allowing for appropriate treatment modifications.
Assuntos
Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Leucemia , Linfoma , Adolescente , Humanos , Líquido da Lavagem Broncoalveolar/microbiologia , Neutropenia Febril/diagnóstico , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/etiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/microbiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/patologia , Leucemia/complicações , Leucemia/patologia , Pulmão/microbiologia , Pulmão/patologia , Linfoma/complicações , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Linfoma/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RD) can cause febrile neutropenia (FN), which frequently requires the prophylactic administration of pegfilgrastim. However, the effects of prophylactic pegfilgrastim on FN prevention, therapeutic efficacy, and prognosis after RD have not been fully evaluated in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two hundred and eighty-eight patients with advanced NSCLC who received RD as second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy plus PD-1 blockade were included. Patients were divided into groups with and without prophylactic pegfilgrastim, and adverse events, efficacy, and prognosis were compared between both groups. Of the 288 patients, 247 received prophylactic pegfilgrastim and 41 did not. The frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia was 62 patients (25.1%) in the pegfilgrastim group and 28 (68.3%) in the control group (p < 0.001). The frequency of FN was 25 patients (10.1%) in the pegfilgrastim group and 10 (24.4%) in the control group (p = 0.018). The objective response rate was 31.2% and 14.6% in the pegfilgrastim and control groups (p = 0.039), respectively. The disease control rate was 72.9% in the pegfilgrastim group and 51.2% in the control group (p = 0.009). Median progression free survival was 4.3 months in the pegfilgrastim group and 2.5 months in the control group (p = 0.002). The median overall survival was 12.8 and 8.1 months in the pegfilgrastim and control groups (p = 0.004), respectively. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim for RD reduced the frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia and did not appear to be detrimental to patient outcome RD.Clinical Trial Registration Number: UMIN000042333.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neutropenia Febril , Filgrastim , Leucopenia , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/etiologia , Ramucirumab , Docetaxel , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Leucopenia/induzido quimicamente , Neutropenia Febril/induzido quimicamente , Neutropenia Febril/prevenção & controle , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Guidelines about febrile neutropenia in paediatric patients are not homogeneous; the best empiric treatment of this condition should be driven by local epidemiology. The Weighted-Incidence Syndromic Combination Antibiogram (WISCA) addresses the need for disease-specific local susceptibility evidence that could guide empiric antibiotic prescriptions based on outcome estimates of treatment regimens obtained as a weighted average of pathogen susceptibilities. This study developed a WISCA model to inform empirical antibiotic regimen selection for febrile neutropenia (FN) episodes in onco-haematological paediatric patients treated at two Italian paediatric tertiary centres. METHODS: We included blood cultures from patients with a bloodstream infection and neutropenia admitted to the Paediatric Haematology-Oncology wards in Padua and Genoa Hospitals from 2016 to 2021. WISCAs were developed by estimating the coverage of 20 antibiotics as monotherapy and of 21 combined regimens with a Bayesian probability distribution. RESULTS: We collected 350 blood cultures, including 196 g-negative and 154 g-positive bacteria. Considering the most used antibiotic combinations, such as piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin, the median coverage for the pool of bacteria collected in the study was 78%. When adding a glycopeptide, the median coverage increased to 89%, while the replacement of piperacillin-tazobactam with meropenem did not provide benefits. The developed WISCAs showed that no monotherapy offered an adequate coverage rate for the identified pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: The application of WISCA offers the possibility of maximizing the clinical utility of microbiological surveillance data derived from large hospitals to inform the choice of the best empiric treatment while contributing to spare broad-spectrum antibiotics.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Neutropenia Febril , Humanos , Criança , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Incidência , Teorema de Bayes , Hospitais Pediátricos , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Bactérias , Itália , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Control of bacterial and fungal infections is critical to improving outcomes in hematological neoplastic diseases of children and adolescents. In this study, a retrospective analysis of our previous studies on febrile neutropenia was performed to investigate bacteremia. PROCEDURE: From August 2008 to December 2023, five antibiotic studies were performed for febrile and neutropenic pediatric patients who had been treated with chemotherapy, immunosuppressive therapy, or had received stem cell transplantation in the pediatric unit at Sapporo Hokuyu Hospital. The rate of positive blood culture, detected bacteria, and susceptibility of several types of antibiotics in febrile episodes were investigated. RESULTS: Blood culture was positive in 133 of 1604 febrile episodes of 329 patients. Detected bacteria were Gram-positive cocci (61.2 %), Gram-negative bacilli (27.6 %), Gram-negative cocci (0.7 %), and Gram-positive bacilli (10.4 %). The incidence of bacteremia over time showed a decreasing trend with each passing year. In particular, the incidence of bacteremia was around 10 % in 2008-2013, whereas it was often below 5 % after 2020; this decrease was statistically significant. Although almost all detected bacteria and their susceptibilities to antibiotics (piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, ceftazidime, and cefozopran) did not change over time, all Escherichia coli detected after 2014 were extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing bacteria.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Neutropenia Febril , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Criança , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/microbiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Pré-Escolar , Lactente , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , IncidênciaRESUMO
Febrile neutropenia (FN) is common among hematologic malignancy patients, including recipients of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and cellular therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy. Prompt empiric antibiotic use has been the mainstay for decades but a "one-size-fits-all" approach is no longer broadly accepted, as treatment-related infectious risk are more understood. Growing antimicrobial resistance is an increasing clinical challenge. Evolving strategies on de-escalation of broad-spectrum antibiotics in FN without identified infection are areas of particular interest.
Assuntos
Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Infecções , Humanos , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Infecções/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Optimal cefepime dosing is a challenge because of its dose-dependent neurotoxicity. This study aimed to determine individualized cefepime dosing for febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 16 patients receiving cefepime at a dose of 2 g every 12 hours. Unbound concentrations were determined at 0.5 hours, 7.2 hours [at the 60% time point of the 12 hours administration interval (C7.2h)], and 11 hours (trough concentration) after the first infusion (rate: 2 g/h). The primary and secondary end points were the predictive performance of the area under the unbound concentration-time curve (AUC unbound ) and the effect of unbound cefepime pharmacokinetic parameters on clinical response, respectively. RESULTS: The mean (SD) AUC unbound was 689.7 (226.6) mcg h/mL, which correlated with C7.2h (R 2 = 0.90), and the Bayesian posterior AUC unbound using only the trough concentration (R 2 = 0.66). Although higher exposure was more likely to show a better clinical response, each parameter did not indicate a statistical significance between positive and negative clinical responses ( P = 0.0907 for creatinine clearance (Ccr), 0.2523 for C7.2h, 0.4079 for trough concentration, and 0.1142 for AUC unbound ). Cutoff values were calculated as 80.2 mL/min for Ccr (sensitivity: 0.889, specificity: 0.714), 18.6 mcg/mL for C7.2h (sensitivity: 0.571, specificity: 1.000), and 9.2 mcg/mL for trough concentration (sensitivity: 0.571, specificity: 1.000). When aiming for a time above 100% the minimum inhibitory concentration, both continuous infusion of 4 g/d and intermittent infusion of 2 g every 8 hours achieved a probability of approximately 100% at a minimum inhibitory concentration of 8 mcg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic drug monitoring by sampling at C7.2h or trough can facilitate rapid dose optimization. Continuous infusion of 4 g/d was recommended. Intermittent dosing of 2 g every 8 hours was alternatively suggested for patients with a Ccr of 60-90 mL/min.
Assuntos
Neutropenia Febril , Linfoma , Mieloma Múltiplo , Humanos , Cefepima , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Mieloma Múltiplo/complicações , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Prospectivos , Teorema de Bayes , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the difference in appropriateness of antimicrobial selection in pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) after implementation of an institutional guideline, a dedicated pediatric emergency medicine (EM) pharmacist, and an electronic order set. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that included febrile patients aged younger than 18 years who were at risk of neutropenia, as defined by our institutional algorithm. Charts were evaluated for inclusion by searching for patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) between February 2018 and January 2022 who had International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for patients at risk of FN. Three independent groups were compared before, during, and after interventions. A historical control group (group 1), postdedicated EM pharmacist and institutional guideline cohort (group 2), and postdedicated EM pharmacist, institutional guideline, and electronic order set cohort (group 3) were compared. Secondary outcomes included time from registration in the ED to administration of the first dose of empiric antimicrobials, days to defervescence, pediatric intensive care unit length of stay, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Seventy-eight charts were reviewed for inclusion. Among those included (n = 38), there was an increase in appropriate use of antimicrobials from 71% to 92% to 100% ( P = 0.1534) between group 1, group 2, and group 3, respectively. In addition, the interventions in this study lead to an overall decrease in the median time from registration to first dose of antibiotics from 142 minutes to 72 minutes ( P = 0.1370). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the positive impact a pediatric EM pharmacist along with an institutional guideline and an electronic order set have on appropriate antimicrobial selection in pediatric FN patients. Institutions should consider multipronged approaches to improve the selection and time to administration of appropriate empiric antimicrobials in the ED.