Adherence-enhancing interventions for pharmacological and oxygen therapy in patients with COPD: a systematic review and component network meta-analyses.

INTRODUCTION: Adherence to COPD management strategies is complex, and it is unclear which intervention may enhance it. OBJECTIVES: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions, alone or compared to interventions, for patients with COPD. METHODS: This review comprises a component network meta-analysis with a structured narrative synthesis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL and trial registries on 9 September 2023. We included controlled studies that explored adherence in patients with COPD. Two review authors independently performed the study selection, data extraction and the risk of bias assessment. We involved patients with COPD in developing this systematic review through focus group interviews and displayed the findings in pre-designed logic models. RESULTS: We included 33 studies with 5775 participants. We included 13 studies in the component network meta-analysis that explored adherence. It was mainly assessed through questionnaires. As a continuous outcome, there was a tendency mainly for education (standardised mean difference 1.26, 95% CI 1.13-1.38, very low certainty of evidence) and motivation (mean difference 1.85, 95% CI 1.19-2.50, very low certainty of evidence) to improve adherence. As a dichotomous outcome (e.g. adherent/non-adherent), we found a possible benefit with education (odds ratio 4.77, 95% CI 2.25-10.14, low certainty of evidence) but not with the other components. We included six studies that reported quality of life in the component network meta-analysis. Again, we found a benefit of education (mean difference -9.70, 95% CI -10.82- -8.57, low certainty of evidence) but not with the other components. CONCLUSIONS: Education may improve adherence and quality of life in COPD patients. Patient focus group interviews indicated that interventions that strengthen patients' self-efficacy and help them to achieve individual goals are the most helpful.

Normobaric Hyperoxia Combined with Endovascular Treatment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (OPENS-2) Trial: Protocol for a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study.

Normobaric hyperoxia (NBO) is a potentially promising stroke treatment strategy that could protect the ischemic penumbra and could be administered as an adjunct before vascular recanalization. However, the efficacy and safety of NBO have not been confirmed by randomized controlled trials. The study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of NBO for ischemic stroke due to large artery occlusion (LVO) of acute anterior circulation among patients who had endovascular treatment (EVT) and were randomized within 6 h from symptom onset. Based on the data of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days from the normobaric hyperoxia combined with EVT for acute ischemic stroke (OPENS: NCT03620370) trial, 284 patients will be included to achieve a 90% power by using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test and the proportional odds model to calculate the sample size. The study is a prospective, multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial. The NBO group is administered with mask oxygen therapy of 10 L/min, while the sham NBO group is with that of 1 L/min. The primary outcome is the mRS score at 90 days. Secondary endpoints include cerebral infarct volume at 24-48 h, functional independence (mRS ≤2) at 90 days, and improvement in neurological function at 24 h. Safety outcomes include 90-day mortality, oxygen-related adverse events, and serious adverse events. This study will indicate whether NBO combined with EVT is superior to EVT alone for acute ischemic stroke caused by LVO in subjects randomized within 6 h from symptom onset and will provide some evidence for NBO intervention as an adjunct to thrombectomy for acute stroke.

Smoke Inhalation in Veterinary Patients: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management.

Smoke contains a mixture of harmful gases, chemicals, and superheated particles. Inhalation of smoke causes generalized hypoxia and airway inflammation due to impaired oxygen transport and utilization, as well as thermal and chemical injury in the airways. Generally, treatment is supportive with oxygen therapy and airway management, including chest physiotherapy, bronchodilators, and nebulization. Immediate oxygen therapy is mandatory for all suspected smoke inhalation patients and should not be delayed pending diagnostic test results or due to "normal" oxygen saturation readings that can be falsely elevated in carbon monoxide intoxication. Smoke inhalation patients with mild clinical signs who respond well to initial stabilization generally have a favorable prognosis. However, patients with severe signs or progression despite initial stabilization may require more advanced or intensive care.

Knowledge, attitude, practice and associated factors of oxygen therapy among health professionals in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Oxygen therapy is a life-saving intervention used in various healthcare settings to maintain adequate tissue oxygenation while minimizing cardiopulmonary work. Its effective and safe administration depends largely on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of health professionals. However, there are no pooled studies that examined these skills in the context of Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the pooled prevalence of health professionals' knowledge, attitude, practice, and determinant factors about oxygen therapy in Ethiopia. METHODS: The databases PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Hinari, Science Direct, African Journal of Online, and Google Scholar were used to search for published studies; Direct Google searches and institutional repositories were used to search for unpublished studies. Duplicate studies were eliminated with Endnote X8 and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of KAP among health professionals. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. Publication bias was checked by visual inspection of a funnel plot and Egger's regression test. STATA version 11 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies with 2,960 participants for knowledge and practice and 9 studies with 1,991 participants for attitude were used to estimate the pooled prevalence of KAP among health professionals. The pooled prevalence of good knowledge, positive attitude, and good practice regarding oxygen therapy were 52.13% (95% CI: 43.88, 60.39), 55.08% (95% CI: 50.80, 59.35%), and 48.94% (95% CI: 41.14, 56.74) respectively. Both good knowledge and positive attitude were affected by the availability of oxygen therapy guidelines, with adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of 6.11 (95% CI: 2.45, 15.22) and 2.17 (95% CI: 1.39, 3.39) respectively. Additionally, good knowledge (AOR: 4.31, 95% CI: 1.53, 12.11), training (AOR: 4.09, 95% CI: 2.04-8.20), and having an adequate oxygen supply and delivery system (AOR: 3.12, 95% CI: 1.92-5.07) were statistically associated with good practice. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The national pooled prevalence of good knowledge, positive attitude, and good practice among health professionals was low. Therefore, thorough monitoring, supervision, and evaluation of their oxygen therapy is highly recommended for all stakeholders. Yet again, we strongly advise that the identified factors be improved by organizing training sessions, making oxygen therapy guidelines available, and maintaining an adequate oxygen supply system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The review protocol was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews with registration number PROSPERO: CRD42023486036.

"Comparison between high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in children with acute respiratory failure by bronchiolitis: a randomized controlled trial".

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare HFNC therapy to noninvasive ventilation (NIV/BiPAP) in children with bronchiolitis who developed respiratory failure. We hypothesized that HFNC therapy would not be inferior to NIV. METHODS: This was a noninferiority open-label randomized single-center clinical trial conducted at a tertiary Brazilian hospital. Children under 2 years of age with no chronic conditions admitted for bronchiolitis that progressed to mild to moderate respiratory distress (Wood-Downes-Férres score < 8) were randomized to either the HFNC group or NIV (BiPAP) group through sealed envelopes. Vital signs, FiO2, Wood-Downes-Férres score and HFNC/NIV parameters were recorded up to 96 h after therapy initiation. Children who developed respiratory failure despite receiving initial therapy were intubated. Crossover was not allowed. The primary outcome analyzed was invasive mechanical ventilation requirement. The secondary outcomes were sedation usage, invasive mechanical ventilation duration, the PICU LOS, the hospital LOS, and mortality rate. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were allocated to the NIV group (132 randomized and 6 excluded), and 126 were allocated to the HFNC group (136 randomized and 10 excluded). The median age was 2.5 (1-6) months in the NIV group and 3 (2-7) months in the HFNC group (p = 0,07). RSV was the most common virus isolated in both groups (72% vs. 71.4%, NIV and HFNC, respectively). Thirty-seven patients were intubated in the NIV group and 29 were intubated in the HFNC group (29% vs. 23%, p = 0.25). According to the Farrington-Manning test, with a noninferiority margin of 15%, the difference was 6.3% in favor of HFNC therapy (95% confidence interval: -4.5 to 17.1%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the PICU LOS or sedation duration. Sedation requirement, hospital LOS and invasive mechanical ventilation duration were lower in the HFNC group. CONCLUSION: HFNC therapy is noninferior to NIV in infants admitted with mild to moderate respiratory distress caused by bronchiolitis that progresses to respiratory failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: U1111-1262-1740; RBR-104z966s. Registered 03/01/2023 (retrospectively registered). ReBEC: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-104z966s .

Hot Dab Associated Pneumonitis - a case report.

BACKGROUND: Dabbing is recently getting popular among young adults. It is a new method of using the most active form of marijuana where large amounts of concentrated tetrahydrocannabinol are inhaled. Tetrahydrocannabinol is associated with a feeling of 'High' which makes the user feel joyous and relaxed. With increasing use of such techniques, dabbing becomes an important differential for evaluation of acute respiratory failure with pneumonitis especially in the adult population. CASE PRESENTATION: A Fifty-one years old Caucasian man presented to the hospital with chest pressure and shortness of breath. The patient was noted to be hypoxic, desaturating down to 82-83% on nasal cannula oxygen. Imaging revealed bilateral lung infiltrates. Patient was started on high flow oxygen, broad spectrum antibiotics and intravenous corticosteroids. The patient gradually improved and was able to come off oxygen completely. He was discharged home on prednisone taper. CONCLUSIONS: Dabbing is a newer technique which has been gaining popularity for marijuana usage. With the legalization of marijuana, newer techniques are getting popular. Our case report emphasizes the importance of keeping dabbing as a differential when a patient presents with respiratory failure and has concerns for pneumonitis. Patients might not reveal until specifically asked about their practices.

The impact of postoperative nasal oxygen therapy on early-stage corneal edema in cataract patients with dynamic Scheimpflug analyze: A retrospective study.

This study aimed to assess the impact of 6 hours of postoperative nasal oxygen therapy on early-stage corneal edema in patients with nuclear cataracts of grades 3 to 4. A retrospective study involved 49 patients (49 eyes) with grades 3 to 4 nuclear cataracts undergoing phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation from September 2021 to September 2022. The oxygen group (27 cases) received postoperative nasal oxygen therapy for 6 hours, while the control group (22 cases) received no additional treatment. Corneal edema was evaluated 24 hours postoperatively using a slit lamp microscope, recording the edema degree. The Pentacam anterior segment analyzer measured central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal volume (CV), and corneal optical density (COD) values preoperatively and 24 hours postoperatively. The study enrolled 49 patients. Preoperatively, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. The oxygen group and the control group exhibited significant differences in CCT, CV, and corneal optical density values before and after surgery for intragroup comparison (all P < .05). At 24 hours postoperatively, the proportion of grade 0 corneal edema in the oxygen therapy group was 59.3%, compared to 31.8% in the control group, with no statistically significant difference (P > .05). The postoperative logMAR visual acuity in the oxygen therapy group was 0.0969 (0.0969, 0.2218), and in the control group it was 0.0969 (0.2218, 0.3979), with a statistically significant difference (P < .05). In oxygen group, the CCT, CV were 585.00 (553.00, 604.00), 68.0 (61.9, 71.3) respectively, all significantly lower than 603.50 (578.50, 788.25), 73.05 (65.3, 75.73) (all P < .05). Statistically significant differences were found in overall COD, COD within specific depth and thickness ranges, and COD within the anterior layer (120 µm thickness) at 24 hours postoperatively (all P < .05). No significant difference was observed in COD values within the central and posterior layers (60 µm thickness) between the 2 groups (all P > .05). Postoperative nasal oxygen therapy for 6 hours immediately after surgery could alleviate the severity of early-stage corneal edema in patients with nuclear cataracts of grades 3 to 4.

Long-Term Oxygen Therapy for 24 or 15 Hours per Day in Severe Hypoxemia.

BACKGROUND: Long-term oxygen supplementation for at least 15 hours per day prolongs survival among patients with severe hypoxemia. On the basis of a nonrandomized comparison, long-term oxygen therapy has been recommended to be used for 24 hours per day, a more burdensome regimen. METHODS: To test the hypothesis that long-term oxygen therapy used for 24 hours per day does not result in a lower risk of hospitalization or death at 1 year than therapy for 15 hours per day, we conducted a multicenter, registry-based, randomized, controlled trial involving patients who were starting oxygen therapy for chronic, severe hypoxemia at rest. The patients were randomly assigned to receive long-term oxygen therapy for 24 or 15 hours per day. The primary outcome, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, was a composite of hospitalization or death from any cause within 1 year. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome assessed at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: Between May 18, 2018, and April 4, 2022, a total of 241 patients were randomly assigned to receive long-term oxygen therapy for 24 hours per day (117 patients) or 15 hours per day (124 patients). No patient was lost to follow-up. At 12 months, the median patient-reported daily duration of oxygen therapy was 24.0 hours (interquartile range, 21.0 to 24.0) in the 24-hour group and 15.0 hours (interquartile range, 15.0 to 16.0) in the 15-hour group. The risk of hospitalization or death within 1 year in the 24-hour group was not lower than that in the 15-hour group (mean rate, 124.7 and 124.5 events per 100 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 1.36; 90% CI, 0.76 to 1.29; P = 0.007 for nonsuperiority). The groups did not differ substantially in the incidence of hospitalization for any cause, death from any cause, or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with severe hypoxemia, long-term oxygen therapy used for 24 hours per day did not result in a lower risk of hospitalization or death within 1 year than therapy for 15 hours per day. (Funded by the Crafoord Foundation and others; REDOX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03441204.).

Perioxygenation During Advanced Airway Management.

ABSTRACT: Advanced airway management is a skill that is used every day in patient care settings throughout the world. Albeit common, it is not benign. Advanced airway management may either be elective or urgent; in either case, it may result in significant patient morbiidity and mortality. The complications of difficult or failed endotracheal intubation can be severe and include death or permanent neurologic injury. Difficulty or failure with advanced airway management often coincides with the onset of hypoxia. The onset of hypoxia affects both the patient and the airway manager. While hypoxemia may result in dysrhythmias and ultimately cardiac arrest for the patient, it adds time pressure and stress to the airway manager, and thus may impact successful performance. In this review, we will discuss how to identify patients at risk for rapid desaturation during advanced airway management. Additionally, methods of peri-oxygenation throughout the performance of airway management will be discussed.

The effect of prone-position ventilatory strategy among neurology patients with SARS-CoV-2: A cross-sectional survey.

Awake-prone position combined with noninvasive ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula ventilation has been shown to be safe in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe ARDS and COVID-19, and may avoid intubation and reduce patient mortality. We conducted a cross-sectional study in a hospital to observe the effect of prone position on neurological patients with SARS-CoV-2. A total of 52 neurological patients with SARS-CoV-2 participated in the survey. Most patients (76.92%) had cerebrovascular disease combined with SARS-CoV-2. After prone position, the oxygen saturation increased by 3.25% ± 3.02%. The number of patients with an oxygen saturation of 95% or more increased by 28.85%. Among the 3 types of neurological diseases, the oxygen saturation improvement values in patients with encephalitis or encephalopathy was the greatest, and cerebrovascular disease was the least. Oxygen saturation improvements did not differ among delivery modes. Prone position nursing can improve the effect of oxygen therapy on patients with neurological diseases combined with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Prone position nursing can slow the need for advanced equipment such as ventilators during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Randomized crossover trial of a demand oxygen delivery system in nocturnal hypoxemia.

The newly developed portable oxygen concentrator with an auto-demand oxygen delivery system (auto-DODS) automatically switches between 3 sensitivities according to the negative pressure gradient of inhalation and supplies oxygen only during inhalation. The aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness and safety of auto-demand devices compared with a continuous flow oxygen concentrator, during sleep, in a randomized crossover noninferiority trial. We alternatively used an auto-DODS or a continuous-flow oxygen concentrator, all night on separate days for HOT (Home Oxygen Therapy) patients with nocturnal hypoxemic symptoms. The primary endpoints were the mean value of oxygen saturation (SpO2) over the total sleep time. The secondary endpoints included the efficacy endpoints and the safety endpoints. Regarding the primary endpoint, the difference in SpO2 between the auto-DODS and continuous flow was 0.835%. Since the upper limit of this difference did not exceed 2.8, which was set as the noninferiority margin, it was shown that the auto-DODS did not reduce SpO2 by at least 2.8% on average compared to continuous flow. No equipment failure or exacerbation of disease was observed, confirming the safety of the auto-DODS during the night.

Understanding facilitators and barriers to oxygen therapy for patients with interstitial lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is comprised of a heterogeneous group of pulmonary diseases. Oxygen therapy is used in patients with advanced lung disease; however, there are challenges associated with initiation of oxygen therapy specific to individuals with ILD. The key objectives of this study were to create a common understanding of the facilitators and barriers to oxygen therapy for patients with ILD, and healthcare professionals (HCP) caring for patients with ILD. METHODS: This qualitative study included 1 hour semistructured focus groups/interviews. An iterative and concurrent process was used for data collection and analysis to allow for supplementary development of themes and concepts generated. Data analysis used a three-phase approach: coding, categorising and development of themes. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients and/or caregivers and 31 HCP took part in 34 focus groups/interviews held over 3 months (November 2022-January 2023). Facilitators to oxygen therapy were identified including support from HCP and support groups, the perseverance and self-advocacy of patients, a straightforward administrative process and vendors/private industry that expedite access to oxygen therapy. There were also several barriers to accessing oxygen therapy for patients with ILD. The themes identified include rural disparity, testing requirements and qualifying for funding and the need for ILD-specific evidence base for oxygen therapy. CONCLUSION: Further research is needed to facilitate development of specific exertional oxygen criteria for patients with ILD, to create supports for oxygen use and monitoring and to enable providers to tailor therapy to patients. Oxygen therapy education for ILD should address the benefits and risks of oxygen therapy.