The disaster liaison for pediatric and perinatal medicine: A new system in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, children, newborns, and pregnant or postpartum women are vulnerable to disasters and emergency situations, and providing support to this population is of great concern. Japan is located in a disaster-prone area, so disaster response and risk reduction strategies are important priorities. METHODS: We introduce a system called the Disaster Liaison for Pediatric and Perinatal Medicine (DLPPM). This was created with a specific focus on perinatal children and pregnant women in Japan. We report the details of its activities, discuss its challenges, and draw on lessons learned for the further development of perinatal support systems, particularly for children. RESULTS: The lessons learned from the activities of the DLPPM include the following: (1) establish a support system for emergency specialists beyond those with pediatric and perinatal specialties; (2) mitigate the risk of indirect damage caused by primary disasters; and (3) establish a networking function linked to existing pediatric and perinatal medicine facilities. CONCLUSIONS: By establishing similar systems, we believe that it will be feasible to address pediatric and perinatal care needs in disaster response contexts in other countries and regions around the world.

A national virtual job search series for neonatal-perinatal medicine fellows.

BACKGROUND: A standardized approach to prepare trainees for the job search has not been described. The objective of this study was to describe and evaluate an educational series on the job search for Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (NPM) fellows and identify participants' job search knowledge gaps. METHODS: During the 2020-2021 academic year, we created a virtual, seven-part job search series for NPM fellows that required no funding. The series has been repeated annually. We use REDCap surveys to register participants, collect baseline/demographic information, and evaluate the series' impact at the beginning and end of the job search timeline. RESULTS: In the 2021-2022 academic year, 290 individuals registered for the series, and 89% completed the baseline/demographic survey. The majority were NPM fellows (89%). Early career neonatologists, NPM hospitalists, and pediatric residents also utilized the series (11%). Less than 25% reported being "knowledgeable" or "very knowledgeable" of core job search components, including the timeline of the job search, contract negotiation, and the general roles and responsibilities of junior faculty. Of those who completed the final job search survey and underwent a job search (60%, 97 of 162), the majority (86%) felt that career planning during training was stressful and believed that job search preparation should be structured into the NPM fellowship curriculum (81%). Many felt that the Job Search Series was helpful in elucidating components of the job search. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several knowledge gaps in NPM fellows' understanding of how to find, prepare for, and negotiate their first post-training job. We strongly believe these knowledge gaps are not unique to NPM fellows and that all graduate medical education trainees would benefit from a similar, easy-to-implement, no-cost series.

Trends of Publications and Country Rankings in Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health from Asia: A Bibliometric Study from 1996 to 2022.

There is a need to analyze the trends of country-wise research output in child heath over the past few decades. A total of 7,87,812 global publications in pediatrics, perinatology and child health were found from 1996 to 2022 in SCOPUS, the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature, covering over 35,000 journals from diverse disciplines. About 13.4% of these were published from Asia. There was an average growth of global publications of 3.53 times between 1996 and 2022, with China and India showing higher growth than the global average.

Critical congenital heart disease: contemporary prenatal screening performance and outcomes in a multi-centre perinatology service.

BACKGROUND: Prenatal detection of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) optimises perinatal decision-making and neonatal outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine the prenatal screening performance, care pathways and perinatal outcomes for prenatally and postnatally diagnosed cases of CCHD over a four-year period. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study in a tertiary centre and its two affiliated secondary sites examined all cases of CCHD, including cases of pregnancy termination and in-utero fetal death, neonatal death and liveborn babies that underwent cardiac catheterization or surgery in the first six weeks of life. Prenatal and postnatal data were ascertained from the first trimester assessment for all patients diagnosed prenatally. Cases requiring intervention that were first identified in the postnatal period were included to determine prenatal detection rates. Follow-up for all cases of CCHD continued to one year of age. RESULTS: In a consecutive cohort of 49,950 pregnancies in a 4-year period 01/2019 to 12/2022, a prenatal diagnosis of CCHD was made in 96 cases, yielding a prevalence of 1.9 per 1000 births. The prenatal detection for right duct-dependant heart pathology and congenital heart block was 100%, 85% for left duct-dependant pathology and 93% for transposition of the great arteries (TGA). In the prenatally diagnosed group, 37% of cases were complicated by extracardiac structural abnormalities, a genetic diagnosis or both. All cases of prenatal detection were identified in the context of routine anatomy screening rather than specialist Fetal Cardiac screening services. Almost half of all pregnancies complicated by CCHD did not undergo neonatal cardiac intervention, by virtue of parental choice determined either prenatally or after birth. An additional eight babies were diagnosed with CCHD in the neonatal period, such that the prenatal detection rate for CCHD was 92% (96/104, 95% CI = 84%-96%). Survival at 1-year for infants deemed suitable for CCHD surgery was 85%. CONCLUSION: In a large unselected population, optimal rates of prenatal detection of critical congenital heart disease can be achieved by a protocolised approach to mid-trimester fetal anatomy ultrasound, underpinned by a programme of sonographer education and training. The cardiac abnormalities most likely to evade prenatal detection are left-sided obstructive lesions.

Counseling in fetal medicine: Congenital cytomegalovirus infection.

Although the clinical work-up of CMV in pregnancy has gradually become more accurate, counseling for CMV is still challenging. Despite the potential feasibility of universal prenatal serological screening, its introduction in prenatal diagnosis continues to raise concerns related to its real cost-effectiveness. Contextually, anticipating the confirmation of fetal infection earlier in pregnancy is one of the most pressing issues to reduce the parental psychological burden. Amniocentesis is still the gold standard and recent data have demonstrated that it could be performed before 20 weeks of gestation, provided that at least 8 weeks have elapsed from the presumed date of maternal seroconversion. New approaches, such as chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and virome DNA, even if not yet validated as confirmation of fetal infection, have been studied alternatively to amniocentesis to reduce the time-interval from maternal seroconversion and the amniocentesis results. Risk stratification for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and long-term sequelae should be provided according to the prognostic predictors. Nevertheless, in the era of valacyclovir, maternal high-dose therapy, mainly for first trimester infections, can reduce the risk of vertical transmission and increase the likelihood of asymptomatic newborns, but it is still unclear whether valacyclovir continues to exert a beneficial effect on fetuses with positive amniocentesis. This review provides updated evidence-based key counseling points with GRADE recommendations.

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Recommendations by the World Association of Perinatal Medicine and Perinatal Medicine Foundation: Reporting Suspected Findings from Fetal Central Nervous System Examination.

These guidelines follow the mission of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine, in collaboration with the Perinatal Medicine Foundation, which brings together groups and individuals worldwide, with the aim to improve prenatal detection of central nervous system anomalies and the appropriate referral of pregnancies with suspected fetal anomalies. In addition, this document provides further guidance for healthcare practitioners with the goal of standardizing the description of ultrasonographic abnormal findings.

Racial and ethnic inequities in stillbirth in the US: Looking upstream to close the gap: Seminars in Perinatology.

Though stillbirth rates in the United States improved over the previous decades, inequities in stillbirth by race and ethnicity have persisted nearly unchanged since data collection began. Black and Indigenous pregnant people face a two-fold greater risk of experiencing the devastating consequences of stillbirth compared to their White counterparts. Because race is a social rather than biological construct, inequities in stillbirth rates are a downstream consequence of structural, institutional, and interpersonal racism which shape a landscape of differential access to opportunities for health. These downstream consequences can include differences in the prevalence of chronic health conditions as well as structural differences in the quality of health care or healthy neighborhood conditions, each of which likely plays a role in racial and ethnic inequities in stillbirth. Research and intervention approaches that utilize an equity lens may identify ways to close gaps in stillbirth incidence or in responding to the health and socioemotional consequences of stillbirth. A community-engaged approach that incorporates experiential wisdom will be necessary to create a full picture of the causes and consequences of inequity in stillbirth outcomes. Investigators working in tandem with community partners, utilizing a combination of qualitative, quantitative, and implementation science approaches, may more fully elucidate the underpinnings of racial and ethnic inequities in stillbirth outcomes.

[EFFECT OF ETHNICITY ON BACTERIAL RESISTANCE AND OBSTETRICAL OUTCOMES AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN ADMITTED TO MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE UNIT WITH THE DIAGNOSIS OF PYELONEPHRITIS DURING 2017-2020].

INTRODUCTION: Antibiotic resistance is a worldwide concern. No study has ever examined the correlation between ethnicity and antibiotic resistance. We examined those parameters among hospitalized pregnant patients diagnosed with pyelonephritis. AIMS: Should ethnic origin play a role in optimizing antibiotic therapy? To better comprehend, we have chosen a cohort of hospitalized pregnant patients with a pyelonephritis diagnosis. METHODS: A total of 105 cases of patients hospitalized in the Shamir Medical Center between the years 2017-2020 were analysed. Feto-maternal outcomes and antibiotic resistance in relation to ethnicity were plotted statistically using chi-square tests (Arab, 40%; North Africa, 13%; Europe-Ashkenaz,10%; Ethiopia/Iran/Kavkaz/Iraq/other, 3%; Turkey/Uzbekistan/Yemen 2%). RESULTS: Ethnic groups included Arab (40%), others referred as "None-Arab". The antibiotic resistance panel revealed differences comparing the two largest groups (Arab% VS non-Arab%), whereas there was no correlation between any ethnic group and obstetrics parameter. Arab women were more resistant to ciprofloxacin (33% vs 7%, P= 0.026) and less sensitive to imipenem (60% vs 90.9%, P= 0.03); less sensitive to ceftriaxone and cefuroxime. CONCLUSIONS: There was a correlation between ethnic origin of pregnant patients diagnosed with pyelonephritis and antibiotic resistance. We hope ethnicity, might, in some cases, assist physicians choosing the optimal therapy.

ChatGPT in maternal-fetal medicine practice: a primer for clinicians.

ChatGPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), a language model that was developed by OpenAI and launched in November 2022, generates human-like responses to prompts using deep-learning technology. The integration of large language processing models into healthcare has the potential to improve the accessibility of medical information for both patients and health professionals alike. In this commentary, we demonstrated the ability of ChatGPT to produce patient information sheets. Four board-certified, maternal-fetal medicine attending physicians rated the accuracy and humanness of the information according to 2 predefined scales of accuracy and completeness. The median score for accuracy of information was rated 4.8 on a 6-point scale and the median score for completeness of information was 2.2 on a 3-point scale for the 5 patient information leaflets generated by ChatGPT. Concerns raised included the omission of clinically important information for patient counseling in some patient information leaflets and the inability to verify the source of information because ChatGPT does not provide references. ChatGPT is a powerful tool that has the potential to enhance patient care, but such a tool requires extensive validation and is perhaps best considered as an adjunct to clinical practice rather than as a tool to be used freely by the public for healthcare information.

Patient Perception of Telemedicine in Maternal-Fetal Medicine.

Background: Maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) is a medical subspecialty that cares for patients with high-risk pregnancies. Methods: An IRB-approved survey was offered to patients in MFM offices of a tertiary health care system from March 2022 to May 2022. Demographics and responses to 15 statements about telemedicine were collected via a 5-point Likert scale. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify factors affecting patient perception of the telemedicine experience. We sought to examine perception of telemedicine in MFM, identify factors affecting perception, and identify whether specific demographics were associated with patients who view telemedicine appointments favorably. Results: Surveys were completed by 327 of 347 (94%) patients. A total of 233 (71%) patients felt that the telemedicine experience was equal in quality to in-person appointments, and 257 (79%) were open to telemedicine appointments in the future. Exploratory factor analysis yielded two factors: "physician attentiveness" and "technology comfort." Telemedicine was viewed favorably or neutrally for both factors. Education (lower) and marital status (single) were associated with a favorable perception of physician attentiveness. Ethnicity (Hispanic), employment status (employed), and prior telemedicine experience were associated with a favorable perception of technology comfort. Conclusion: Most patients felt the quality of telemedicine appointments was equal to those completed in person. Physician attentiveness and technology comfort affect telemedicine perception. Specific patient demographic characteristics were associated with differing perceptions of telemedicine in MFM. Our findings suggest that telemedicine is positively viewed for MFM and can be used for improving health care delivery efficiency in MFM.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Emergency checklist, planning worksheet, and system preparedness bundle for placenta accreta spectrum.

Placenta accreta spectrum is a life-threatening complication of pregnancy that is underdiagnosed and can result in massive hemorrhage, disseminated intravascular coagulation, massive transfusion, surgical injury, multisystem organ failure, and even death. Given the rarity and complexity, most obstetrical hospitals and providers do not have comprehensive expertise in the diagnosis and management of placenta accreta spectrum. Emergency management, antenatal interdisciplinary planning, and system preparedness are key pillars of care for this life-threatening disorder. We present an updated sample checklist for emergent and unplanned cases, an antenatal planning worksheet for known or suspected cases, and a bundle of activities to improve system and team preparedness for placenta accreta spectrum.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #68: Sickle cell disease in pregnancy.

Pregnant individuals with sickle cell disease have an increased risk of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. However, prepregnancy counseling and multidisciplinary care can lead to favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes. In this consult series, we summarize what is known about sickle cell disease and provide guidance for sickle cell disease management during pregnancy. The following are Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommendations.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Clinical quality measures in obstetrics.

This article provides an updated overview and critique of clinical quality measures relevant to obstetrical care. The history of the quality movement in the United States and the proliferation of quality metrics over the past quarter-century are reviewed. Common uses of quality measures are summarized: payment programs, accreditation, public reporting, and quality improvement projects. We present listings of metrics that are reported by physicians or hospitals, either voluntarily or by mandate, to government agencies, payers, "watchdog" ratings organizations, and other entities. The costs and other burdens of extracting data and reporting metrics are summarized. The potential for unintended adverse consequences of the use of quality metrics is discussed along with approaches to mitigating adverse consequences. Finally, some recent attempts to develop simplified core measure sets are presented, with the promise that the complex and burdensome quality-metric enterprise may improve in the near future.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Statement: Clinical considerations for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus disease in infants.

Respiratory syncytial virus is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract illness globally in children aged <5 years. Each year, approximately 58,000 hospitalizations in the United States are attributed to respiratory syncytial virus. Infants aged ≤6 months experience the most severe morbidity and mortality. Until recently, prevention with the monoclonal antibody, palivizumab, was only offered to infants with high-risk conditions, and treatment primarily consisted of supportive care. Currently, 2 products are approved for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus in infants. These include the Pfizer bivalent recombinant respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F protein subunit vaccine, administered seasonally to the pregnant person between 32 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks of gestation, and the monoclonal antibody, nirsevimab, administered to infants aged up to 8 months entering their first respiratory syncytial virus season. With few exceptions, administering both the vaccine to the pregnant person and the monoclonal antibody to the infant is not recommended. All infants should be protected against respiratory syncytial virus using one of these strategies. Key considerations for pregnant individuals include examining available safety and efficacy data, weighing accessibility and availability, and patient preferences for maternal vaccination vs infant monoclonal antibody treatment. It will be critical for maternal-fetal medicine physicians to provide effective and balanced counseling to aid patients in deciding on a personalized approach to the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus in their infants.

Collaboration between maternal-fetal medicine and family planning: a survey of Northeast US academic medical centers.

OBJECTIVES: To explore how complex family planning (CFP) and maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) in Northeast academic medical centers work together to provide abortion care. METHODS: We distributed an exploratory cross-sectional online survey to CFP and MFM faculty and fellows at academic medical centers in the Northeast between July and September of 2020. The survey included demographic information, assessment of practice patterns, hospital/administration support and assessment of collaboration. Likert scale questions examined opinions about collaboration and an open-ended question solicited ideas for improvement. We performed bivariate analysis to examine the association between subspecialty and practice location regarding provision of abortion care and perceived barriers to care. RESULTS: The response rate was 31 % and was similar by specialty. Of the 69 respondents, 83 % were MFMs, 75 % were faculty, and 54 % practiced in New York. More than 85 % reported personal participation in some portion of abortion care. The two most common perceived barriers to care were "lack or reluctance of physicians/staff" and state laws prohibiting termination. Nearly all (95 %) stated there was a good working relationship between CFP and MFM divisions; however, almost one-third agreed with or were neutral to the statements "MFM and CFP are siloed in terms of work/patient care." CONCLUSIONS: Academic MFM and CFP providers in the Northeast collaborate well in providing abortion care, though our findings highlight areas that would benefit from improvement. Optimizing collaboration in the Northeast is important given its regional role for ensuring abortion access in the current national landscape. Improved education of all members of the patient care team on the importance of abortion access may also help provide optimal patient care where abortion services still legally exist.