Family caregivers' perceptions of the quality of primary healthcare services for people with disabilities: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: How do caregivers of people with disabilities perceive the quality of health services in primary healthcare? OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to show the quality of health services for people with disabilities in primary healthcare, based on the perceptions of family caregivers. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. During data collection, 49 family caregivers who use the center were interviewed. The assessment instruments used were the Socio-Economic and Demographic Questionnaire and the PCATool-Brasil (Primary Care Assessment Tool), in the reduced adult and child versions, to assess the level of essential and derived characteristics of primary healthcare. RESULTS: Women were the main caregivers (40; 82%), and the main disability was mental (28; 58%). The highest scores were observed in affiliation (100%), utilization (73.4%), and information system (83.7%). The lowest scores were found in longitudinal (26.5%), integration of care, available services, services provided (28.6%), and derived scores (28.6-22.4%) related to family guidance and community guidance. The population showed a low orientation toward primary healthcare, with a high total score (22.4%). The economic situation showed a positive association (p=0.017). CONCLUSION: According to the characteristics of primary healthcare, care is fragmented and disjointed and does not meet the needs of people with disabilities and their caregivers.

Compliance with COVID-19 government guidance and rules by disabled people and people from minoritised ethnic groups: Qualitative findings from the CICADA study.

Within the 2020/21 CICADA (Coronavirus Intersectionalities: Chronic Conditions or Disabilities and Migrants and other Ethnic minorities) study, we explored full, partial or noncompliance with government COVID-19 infection-containment measures by people from minoritised ethnic groups with a disabling health condition or impairment. We used an assets-based intersectional approach and purposive sampling, included non-disabled and White British comparators, and trained community co-researchers to help us reach undocumented migrants and asylum seekers. We undertook 271 semi-structured qualitative interviews, followed by participatory workshops with interviewees to explore data and changes in experiences five and 10 months after the interviews. Perceiving their vulnerability to COVID-19, most participants quickly and often zealously adopted infection-containment behaviours, and continued this after restrictions were lifted. This could reduce mental wellbeing, especially in community-facing cultures, and could create family conflict. Various structural inequities impeded compliance. Many, especially undocumented migrants, felt imprisoned. The intersection of gender, citizenship, socioeconomic status and culture impacted disclosures of COVID-19 infection, support seeking and use. Many were unclear what was safe as well as unsafe. People complained that disability and cultural considerations were omitted from policymaking. Participants mostly had taken the COVID-19 vaccine by October 2022, but ethnic minority participants needed time to deliberate and trusted, community-embedded information whereas White British participants were mostly influenced by mass media. The intersection of health condition or impairment, poverty, and living alone led to more non-compliance with general rules, and more vaccine hesitancy than did misinformation spread through ethnic community channels. Many participants were reluctant to reintegrate in May 2022 because of continued perceived vulnerability to COVID-19 but by September 2022 = seemed more concerned about the economic crisis. We add two new 'types' to existing compliance typologies: deliberators (who eventually decide to follow the rules), and 'necessity-driven non-compliers' who are totally unable to comply because of their disabilities.

Trajectories of work disability among individuals with anxiety-, mood/affective-, or stress-related disorders in a primary healthcare setting.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety-, mood/affective-, or stress-related disorders affect up to one-third of individuals during their lives and often impact their ability to work. This study aimed to delineate trajectories of work disability (WD) among individuals diagnosed with anxiety-, mood/affective-, or stress-related disorder in primary healthcare and to examine associations between trajectory group membership and sociodemographic, clinical, and clinical-related factors. METHODS: The study population included working-age individuals, aged 22-62 years, living in Stockholm County, Sweden, who experienced a new episode of any anxiety-, mood/affective, or stress-related disorder in primary healthcare in 2017 (N = 11,304). Data were obtained from Swedish national and regional registers and were linked using pseudonymised unique personal identification numbers. The primary outcome was days with WD (sum of sickness absence and disability pension days) during the three years before and three years after a diagnosis of anxiety-, mood/affective-, or stress-related disorders in primary healthcare. A zero-inflated Poisson group-based trajectory model was used to identify groups of individuals with similar patterns of WD over the study period, with a multinomial logistic regression used to examine associations of sociodemographic, clinical, and clinical-related factors with trajectory group membership. RESULTS: Four distinct trajectory groups were found, high increasing (5.1%), with high levels, from 16 to 80 days of WD in six-monthly intervals during follow-up, peak (11.1%), with a peak in WD, up to 32 days of WD, around the time of the diagnosis, low increasing (12.8%), with an increase in days of WD from 4 to 22 during the study period, and constant low (71.1%), with almost no WD over the study period. In multinomial regression models, diagnostic category, psychotropic medication use, a diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder within secondary healthcare, age at diagnosis, and occupation were associated with WD trajectory groups. CONCLUSIONS: Around two-thirds of individuals treated for a new episode of any anxiety-, mood/affective-, or stress-related disorder in primary healthcare have an excellent prognosis regarding WD. Several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were associated with group membership; these factors could identify individuals at risk of long-term welfare dependency and who might benefit from interventions to promote a return to work.

[Recommendations for assessment of disability in private accident insurance-Interdisciplinary consensus-Status September 2024 : Recommended for use by the Specialist Society of Interdisciplinary Medical Expert Opinion (FGIMB) on 6 October 2023]. / Bemessungsempfehlungen zur Invalidität in der privaten Unfallversicherung ­ fachübergreifender Konsens ­ Stand 09/2024 : Von der Fachgesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Medizinische Begutachtung (FGIMB) e. V. zur Anwendung empfohlen am 06.10.2023.

The centerpiece in private accident insurance is the compensation in cases of disability, which must be determined by a physician within a certain time limit. The insurer contract specifies the compensation rate for loss or inability to function. In cases of insurance the medical expert has to refer to generally accepted revised or updated assessment recommendations in order to be able to apply the given framework to the specific individual disability situation of the insured person. This article deals with the interdisciplinary consensus benchmarks for the assessment of disability, which form the principles of a uniform medical assessment of accident-related functional disorders in the private accident insurance.With the publication of these new assessment recommendations developed under the guidance of the Specialist Society of Interdisciplinary Medical Expert Opinion (FGIMB), the recommendations published by Schröter and Ludolph in 2009 [12] are withdrawn, so that these are now replaced as the authoritative version by the assessment recommendations of the FGIMB.

Inequalities in the use of dental services by people with and without disabilities in Brazil: a National Health Survey.

OBJECTIVES: The present cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate if social, racial, and gender inequalities disproportionally affect the use of dental services by people with and without disabilities in Brazil in the year 2013. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study used data from the 2013 National Health Survey and the dependent variable was the use of dental services. The outcome was stratified by gender, race, and social variables. Descriptive analysis was represented by absolute and relative frequencies. Two inequality measures were used to investigate the inequalities: the Slope Index of Inequalities (SII) and the Concentration Index of Inequalities (CIX). The SII expresses the absolute difference and the CIX identifies the relative inequality. RESULTS: Of 145,580 adults evaluated, 7.7% reported disability. The proportion of adults without disabilities who used dental services in the last 12 months was higher (45.2%; 95%CI 44.2-46.1) than adults with disabilities (33.9%; 95%CI 32.0-35.9). There was an absolute difference of 40% points (SII 0.40; CI95% (0.36-0.45) in the use of dental services between poorer and richer people with disabilities. Absolute and relative inequalities were identified in the use of dental services, considering the education of the head of the family and family income, with similar results for people with and without disabilities. High inequality is observed concerning race. Racial minorities (Black, Brown, Yellow, and Indigenous) without disabilities presented a higher use of dental services in the last 12 months than racial minorities with disabilities. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that social and racial inequities negatively affect individuals with and without disabilities. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Inequalities exist in the use of oral health services for people with and without disabilities.

Burden of osteoarthritis in Indonesia: A Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study 2019.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a complex and common condition, especially affecting the knees due to their weight-bearing role. Traditionally seen as a degenerative disease, OA is now understood to have both mechanical and inflammatory causes. Despite its increasing prevalence, there is limited data on OA in Indonesia, resulting in low awareness among clinicians and the public. The aim of this study was to describe the OA burden in Indonesia, focusing on its prevalence, incidence, and years lived with disability (YLD) from 1990 to 2019, using data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study 2019. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted to examine the prevalence, incidence, and YLD of OA in Indonesia from the GBD study 2019. OA prevalence and YLD were compared to other countries according to similar social demographics and geographical proximity. OA YLD was also compared to the top causes of death and disability YLD in Indonesia. The study found that OA cases in Indonesia more than doubled from 1990 to 2019, with increases of 153.12% in males and 143.36% in females. Similar trends were observed for knee OA. The age-standardized prevalence rate in Indonesia increased by 11.03% in males and 8.42% in females, and these were higher compared to China, India, Singapore, and the global average. Younger people had a higher OA prevalence rate growth than older groups. The incidence rate for OA also rose significantly, with males seeing a 10.89% increase to 290 per 100,000 people and females with an 8.57% increase to 384 per 100,000 people. Despite lower overall burden rates compared to some countries, Indonesia experienced significant growth in YLD due to OA (12.16% in males and 9.65% in females) since 1990. Although OA was less burdensome than stroke, diabetes, low back pain, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), its YLD growth rate was higher. In conclusion, OA prevalence and incidence in Indonesia significantly increased from 1990 to 2019, with a notable rise among younger populations. OA had a higher YLD growth compared to several other major diseases in Indonesia, highlighting the need for early detection and preventive measures, particularly for the younger population.

AI and disability: A systematic scoping review.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance life experiences and present challenges for people with disabilities. Objectives: This study aims to investigate the relationship between AI and disability, exploring the potential benefits and challenges of using AI for people with disabilities. Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted using eight online databases; 45 scholarly articles from the last 5 years were identified and selected for thematic analysis. Results: The review's findings revealed AI's potential to enhance healthcare; however, it showed a high prevalence of a narrow medical model of disability and an ableist perspective in AI research. This raises concerns about the perpetuation of biases and discrimination against individuals with disabilities in the development and deployment of AI technologies. Conclusion: We recommend shifting towards a social model of disability, promoting interdisciplinary collaboration, addressing AI bias and discrimination, prioritizing privacy and security in AI development, focusing on accessibility and usability, investing in education and training, and advocating for robust policy and regulatory frameworks. The review emphasizes the urgent need for further research to ensure that AI benefits all members of society equitably and that future AI systems are designed with inclusivity and accessibility as core principles.

Lived experiences of diabetes self-management among persons with disabilities in rural Tamil Nadu - a case study approach.

BACKGROUND: People with disabilities have numerous challenges in diabetes self-management. Poor self-management leads to the worsening of disability and secondary complications of diabetes. This study was conducted to explore the challenges in diabetes self-management and the factors influencing diabetes self-management among people with disabilities. METHODS: We conducted 16 case studies among people with physical, neurological, visual, hearing, and multiple disabilities who were affected by diabetes. We adopted a thematic content analysis approach to analyse the data. RESULTS: People with disabilities have challenges in adopting healthy diets as they are unable to purchase and consume fruits and vegetables which are costly, unavailable, and inaccessible. They have difficulty in doing physical activity due to lack of inclusive public spaces which are inaccessible, lack of motivation, and dependence on others for their mobility. Irregular drug supply in the public health system and unaffordable cost of drugs hamper adherence to medications. Laboratories are inaccessible to people with disabilities thus preventing monitoring of blood sugars. They have poor quality of life, life with pain and mental health issues, which prevent adoption of self-management behaviors. The intersectionality of age and gender with disability worsens self-management behaviors. Inaccessible health system, poor quality of health care and insensitive health care providers further complicate self-management. CONCLUSION: This study documents the challenges faced by persons with disabilities in practicing diabetes self management. There is a need for public health policy and planning that is inclusive of persons with disabilities to make access to diabetes care universal.

COVID-19 vaccine uptake in individuals with functional difficulty, disability, and comorbid conditions: insights from a national survey in Bangladesh.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccine uptake among individuals with disabilities is crucial for safeguarding their health and well-being. However, the extent of vaccine uptake among this group remains largely unknown in low- and middle-income countries. This study aims to assess the COVID-19 vaccine uptake among persons with functional difficulty, disability and/or comorbidity in Bangladesh and their associated factors. METHODS: Data from 9,370 respondents extracted from the 2021 National Household Survey on Persons with Disability were analysed. The outcome variable was the uptake of at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine (yes, no). Key explanatory variables included the presence of disability (yes, no), comorbidity (yes, no), and both comorbidity and disability (yes, no) among persons with functional difficulty. The relationship between the outcome and explanatory variables was determined using mixed-effects multilevel logistic regressions adjusted for covariates. RESULTS: The overall uptake of at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine among persons with functional difficulty was 57.37%, among persons with functional difficulty and disability was 48.63% and among persons with functional difficulty and single (57.85%) or multi-comorbidity (60.37%). Compared to the respondents with functional difficulty only, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of not receiving any dose of the COVID-19 vaccine for individuals with both functional difficulty and disability was 1.37 (95% CI, 1.22-1.53), and for individuals with functional difficulty, disability and one or more comorbid conditions was 1.30 (95% CI, 1.15-1.47). The aOR of receiving at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine among individuals with functional difficulty and one or more comorbid conditions was significantly higher than among those with functional difficulty only. CONCLUSION: In Bangladesh, COVID-19 vaccine uptake was relatively low among individuals with disabilities. The existing COVID-19 vaccine rollout programs and similar future programs should prioritise individuals with disabilities and include targeted strategies to reach them.

Towards multi-faceted outcomes of participation-based interventions: mapping the PREP's effects for children and youth with disabilities.

PURPOSE: Systematically organizing participation effects may guide participation-based research designs in rehabilitation. This perspective paper uses existing evidence on Pathways and Resources for Engagement and Participation (PREP) to showcase the multitude of effects from a single intervention and synthesize the magnitude of these effects. METHODS: An outcome matrix of participation effects comprising three dimensions (intermediate, instrumental, ultimate) and two levels (transient, enduring) was used to systematically map PREP's effects. Forest plot demonstrated clinically important changes in the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) across studies. Effect sizes were calculated. RESULTS: The majority of outcomes from 11 studies were mapped to ultimate-transient effects (e.g., changes in participation of self-chosen activities), followed by instrumental-transient effects (e.g., changes in motor body functions). Fewer outcomes were mapped to ultimate-enduring effects (e.g., changes of participation for a longer period or across settings) or intermediate-enduring effects (e.g., therapist-applied knowledge), demonstrating the gaps for investigating enduring effects. COPM changes in most studies (89%) showed clinical significance with small to large effects. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic mapping from PREP example guides categorizing multidimensional outcomes. Future participation-based studies can employ individual-based mixed-methods designs to delve into the long-lasting enduring outcomes of youth capacity-building and the transformative process of pursuing meaningful participation goals.

Systematically organizing participation effects according to the proposed matrix enhances understanding of multidimentisonal outcomes from a single participation-based intervention.Child/youth-engaging interventions like Pathways and Resources for Engagement and Participation (PREP) can offer a multitude of benefits that promote outcomes of participation and physical and mental health, enhancing efficient/effective rehabilitation services.It is essential that future intervention designs prioritize long-lasting/enduring effects across broad settings and capture underlying processes and capacity building of children/youth toward sustainable participation outcomes.

Disability Assessment with WHODAS 2.0 of People with Fibromyalgia in Poland: A Cross Sectional-Study.

BACKGROUND Fibromyalgia (FM) is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by chronic widespread pain, fatigue, sleep and cognitive impairment and functional symptoms. The aim of this study was to assess disability and its associated factors. The study was conducted among 691 patients with fibromyalgia in Poland using an online survey. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a cross-sectional study of the disability of patients with fibromyalgia aged 18 years and over in Poland. The study was conducted by means of an online questionnaire distributed to patients affiliated with the National Association of Patients with Fibromyalgia. A total of 691 records were analyzed. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) 36-item version was used to assess disability. The Beck Depression Inventory was used to assess the participants' emotional state. Sociodemographic and selected health data were collected. RESULTS The study group had a significant general level of disability as measured by the WHODAS 2.0 (mean=49.69). The greatest limitations were found in the following areas: life activity (mean=73.43), social participation (mean=64.59), and mobility (mean=62.07). The categorical sociodemographic variables that statistically significantly differentiated the participants in terms of general level of disability were occupational status (P<0.005), pain level (P<0.001), number of medications taken (P=0.005), and level of depression (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Disability is present in fibromyalgia and is a major concern. Understanding the determinants of disability in fibromyalgia can contribute to the development of effective therapies and symptom relief.

Trajectories of cognitive function development and predictive factors in disabled middle-aged and older adults.

Objective: To explore the trajectories of cognitive function development and predictive factors in disabled middle-aged and older adults. Methods: Utilizing data from 983 disabled middle-aged and older adults in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) from 2013 to 2020, latent growth mixture models were constructed to analyze the categories of cognitive function development trajectories and their predictive factors. Results: The cognitive function trajectories of the disabled middle-aged and older adults were classified into three categories: rapid decline (32.6%), Slow decline (36.1%), and Stable (31.2%). Multinomial logistic regression analysis identified age, gender, residence, education, marital status, household income, sleep duration, depression, hearing ability, and social participation as predictors of these trajectories. Conclusion: There is heterogeneity in the cognitive function development trajectories among disabled middle-aged and older adults. Healthcare professionals can implement targeted health management based on the characteristics of different groups to prevent the deterioration of cognitive function in this population.

[Testing an algorithm to identify disabilities using current health and social healthcare database: the experience of the Agency for Health Protection of the Metropolitan Area of Milan]. / La classificazione delle disabilità utilizzando i flussi sanitari e sociosanitari correnti: l'algoritmo sviluppato dall'Agenzia di Tutela della Salute della Città Metropolitana di Milano.

OBJECTIVES: to describe prevalence of disability in the population of the Agency for Health Protection of Milan (ATS Milan), integrating current administrative healthcare, socio-healthcare, and social data; to classify disability with a diagnosis into a predominant structural and functional category according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), supplementing it with additional levels of detail. DESIGN: retrospective observational study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: subjects residing in the territory of ATS Milan in the years from 2018 to 2022.  Main outcomes measures: prevalence of disability in the population of ATS Milan from 2018 to 2022; average annual costs since disability diagnosis of the entire population and stratified by the most common ICF classifications. RESULTS: the prevalence of disability ranges from 5.8% in 2018 to 8.4% in 2022. In general, women have a higher prevalence than men. However, there are significant differences in the gender distribution depending on the considered age group. The main disabilities (32.2%) affect the structures of the nervous system and mental functions, followed by disabilities identified solely by major prosthetic devices (9.4%) and sensory disabilities with alterations in sensory functions with the presence of a major device (5.2%). Analysis of average total annual per capita costs shows an upward trend with increasing years since the diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: the definition of standardized tools, such as the selection from several available healthcare data provided by service suppliers, can be helpful in obtaining reliable data on the prevalence of disability in the population. This evidence can be useful in planning public health interventions to address the needs of this population. The work developed by ATS Milan has been carried out in alignment with the activities outlined in Mission 5 of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR), in particular for the reform of disability legislation, which foresees the definition of standardized tools for the in-depth study of the epidemiological aspects of the phenomenon.