["Nothing about us without us": deafness in history teaching and historiography, 2015-2022]. / "Nada sobre nós, sem nós": a surdez no ensino de história e na produção historiográfica, 2015-2022.

This text presents the partial results of ongoing research into deafness in history teaching and historiography between 2015 and 2022. The study problematizes the place of disabled people in top-ranking periodicals (the top two categories in Brazil) and in pedagogical projects on degree courses in history (with and without teacher-training certification) at the University of São Paulo and the State University of Campinas. These universities were chosen because they topped the ranking in a survey conducted by Folha de S.Paulo newspaper. The study observes how the Brazilian Inclusion Law (law 13.146, of July 6, 2015) is incorporated into the initial training of these professionals.

O texto aponta resultados parciais de uma pesquisa em andamento sobre a surdez no ensino de história e na produção historiográfica entre 2015 e 2022. O trabalho problematiza o lugar da pessoa com deficiência nos periódicos A1 e A2 e nos projetos pedagógicos de cursos de graduação em história (formação de professores e pesquisadores) da Universidade de São Paulo e da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, por conta de serem indicadas como as mais bem posicionadas no ranking de uma pesquisa realizada pela Folha de S.Paulo, levando-se em conta os critérios de articulação entre a Lei Brasileira de Inclusão, lei 13.146, de 6 de julho de 2015, e a formação inicial desses profissionais.

Clinical Teaching and Consent: An Analysis of New Zealand's Legal Requirements for Obtaining Consent to Clinical Teaching Involving Consumers of Health and Disability Services.

Student involvement in patient care without consent has attracted recent attention in New Zealand. New Zealand's Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights (Code) gives patients the right to give or refuse consent to participate in clinical teaching, but its practical application to clinical teaching, particularly postgraduate, is unclear. This article explores the history and precedent of the Code and ethical considerations, to inform where amendment to the Code is desirable in the interests of clarity, pragmatism, and to reflect better the legislature's intent.

The CRPD and mental health law reform in Scotland.

Scotland's mental health and capacity legislation and its implementation is underpinned by European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) informed principles, and such legislation and its implementation has remained largely ECHR compliant. It is designed to protect individuals' autonomy from inappropriate and disproportionate nonconsensual intrusions but its scope is largely limited to this. However, since the legislation was enacted at the start of the twenty first century the UK subsequently ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) which requires the law and related practice to focus on giving effect to all the rights of persons with mental disabilities (people living with psychosocial, cognitive and intellectual disabilities) on an equal basis with others and to actively support such equality in rights enjoyment. The Terms of Reference of the independent Scottish Mental Health Law Review (2019-2022) included considering and making recommendations to align Scotland's mental health and capacity legislation with the CRPD. After engaging widely with stakeholders its recommendations sought to strengthen the voice of persons who use services and of those who care for them, reduce the need for non-consensual measures and secure rights to the help and support necessary to live a good life. In order to achieve this, it recommended, amongst other things, a refocusing on mental health and capacity law together with a Human Rights Enablement, Supported Decision Making and Autonomous Decision Making framework.

Disability Degree Assessment: A Comprehensive Approach According to Royal Decree 888/2022. / Evaluación del grado de discapacidad: un enfoque integral según el Real Decreto 888/2022.

BACKGORUND AND OBJECTIVE: Royal Decree 888/2022 establishes that the evaluation of disability situations is carried out by multiprofessional teams responsible for assessing and recognizing the degree of disability. The participation of professionals in the healthcare and social fields can be valuable in providing reports from which the necessary data for the proper assessment of disability can be obtained, with the ultimate goal of providing comprehensive assistance to people with disabilities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An analysis and summary of Royal Decree 888/2022, which has recently come into effect, is performed, focusing on the most relevant aspects for professionals in the healthcare and social fields. RESULTS: The recognition and classification of the degree of disability are the responsibility of the autonomous communities, and the assessments are issued by multiprofessional teams. To do this, four components are evaluated using the criteria outlined in the annexes of the Royal Decree itself. Each criterion generates a score that is combined to obtain a single score, the Final Disability Degree of the Person. CONCLUSIONS: The pathology that causes the disability must have been previously diagnosed by the Healthcare System and considered permanent. Its evaluation is based on the evidence of objective clinical findings that are documented and supported by clinical reports. For this reason, it is important to maintain an accurate medical history, document reviews, and provide all relevant evidence.

What some physicians say about caring for patients with disability: Responses to open-ended question to nationwide physician survey.

BACKGROUND: For over 50 years, federal disability civil rights laws have mandated that patients with disability receive equitable health care. However, disabled patients continue to experience health care disparities. OBJECTIVE: To explore physicians' views, in their own words, about caring for patients with disability. METHODS: Review of responses to open-ended question at the end of a nationally representative survey of 714 outpatient physicians about their experiences caring for adult disabled patients. The open-ended question asked for additional comments participants wanted to share. Only 108 (15.1 %) survey participants provided responses suitable for analysis (e.g., legible, complete thought). All issues reported here reflect comments from ≥5 participants. RESULTS: Common concerns involved high costs, too little time, insufficient space, inadequate training, and lack of adequate mental health services to care for disabled patients. Many physicians appeared frustrated by legal requirements that they cover accommodation costs. Multiple physicians described as "unfair" having to pay for sign language interpreters, especially since interpreter costs generally exceed reimbursements for patients' visits. Physicians also commented on high costs and space demands of accessible exam tables, especially for small practices, and on challenges accommodating patients with severe obesity, including concerns that patients with severe obesity could damage their exam tables. Some participants suggested that disabled patients require advocates to get good quality care. CONCLUSIONS: Albeit limited by the small number of responses, these open-ended comments from our nationwide survey of physicians suggest some doctors view certain accessibility requirements as unfair to them or infeasible in their practice environments.

The influence of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities on the European court of human rights in the area of mental health law: Divergence and unexplored potential.

This article explores how the European Court of Human Rights has applied the norms of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) in the area of mental health law. The European Court was initially receptive to the CRPD, including the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities' call for a repeal of legislation permitting involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation, but later distanced itself from it. The CRPD has nevertheless influenced how the European Court approached (a) involuntary hospitalisation, (b) separating detention from treatment, (c) restraints and other forms of ill-treatment in institutions, and (d) disability-neutral detention based on disability. Despite the two treaty bodies' different jurisprudential methodology and their different assumptions about the role of medical and legal professionals, the CRPD can continue to influence the European Court in areas such as less restrictive alternatives to coercive treatment, the relevance of capacity, and the importance of personal integrity for mental health treatment.

Endometriosis and Disability: Analysis of Federal Court Appeals of Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income Claims by Individuals Suffering From Endometriosis.

BACKGROUND: Endometriosis, a chronic noncancerous gynecologic condition commonly characterized by disruptive physical and psychosocial symptoms, can be disabling. Individuals in the United States with endometriosis who are unable to work before retirement age can apply for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and/or Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Given the multi-step process of disability review, it is important to better understand how disability decisions are made. This study aimed to examine approaches and rationales of U.S. federal appeals courts reviewing SSDI and/or SSI claims involving endometriosis-related issues of appeal. METHODS: We searched Westlaw and Nexis Uni records, available as of January 2021, for federal appeals of SSDI and SSI claims including endometriosis as an impairment. Two independent reviewers screened full-text cases and extracted data. Framework Analysis was applied to courts' rationales regarding endometriosis-related issues of appeal. RESULTS: Eighty-seven appeals addressed an endometriosis-related issue. Three themes-evidence, treatment, and time-were identified across the decisions. The courts' discussions across themes exposed rationales and evidentiary requirements that posed challenges for claimants with endometriosis. The courts found subjective reports of symptoms insufficient evidence of impairment and positive responses to treatments to indicate cures or prevent claimants from demonstrating the necessary continuous 12 months of impairment. Some courts expected claimants to use treatments such as contraception or hysterectomy without addressing the risks of such treatments or the fact that they might have been counter to claimants' needs and preferences. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with endometriosis face evidentiary obstacles and common misconceptions about disease, diagnosis, and treatment in disability claims. SSDI and SSI endometriosis claims are systematically disadvantaged, particularly among those without access to care. The health care, policy, and legal systems can leverage the findings in this study to create a more equitable disability application and review system for those with chronic pain conditions such as endometriosis.

Widening the net: Use of social media data in personal injury and disability evaluations.

A central tenet of forensic mental health assessment is the use of multiple sources of data. Traditionally, these sources have included clinical interviews with and observations of the examinee, written records review, psychological test data, and interviews with collateral sources. Data from social media and social networking sites (SNS) is now widely used in civil litigation. However, existing professional practice standards and guidelines do not specifically address the use of SNS data. This leaves forensic mental health evaluators with little guidance as to why, when and how to incorporate SNS data into their evaluations. We review the extant literature on the use of SNS and other social media data in personal injury and disability cases, including legal, ethical, and practical considerations, with the goal of providing forensic mental health practitioners with a framework for making decisions about when and how to incorporate these data into their evaluations and opinions. We advocate caution in conducting independent searches of social media and the Internet, and in making inferences about internal states based on SNS postings. To illustrate these points, we include a case study.

Brain injury, medical progress, and the disability paradox: Towards an Americans with Abilities Act.

It is helpful to think about the needs of patients with moderate to severe brain injury through the lens of disability law. However, there are limitations to current disability law that contribute to ongoing segregation and marginalization of individuals with severe brain injury. Indeed, one of the paradoxes of American jurisprudence is that more clear constitutional protections accrue to those who have definitively immutable conditions. Thus, as neuroscience brings new therapies to those with brain injury, they may become less protected by the constitutional elements of disability law because their conditions have changed and become mutable. This is the clinical progress that brain injury professionals all seek to achieve, but ironically these advances could potentially degrade the legal protections of patients who benefit from emerging treatments. In this paper, we will critically examine this paradox at the interface of medicine and the law and suggest that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) could be nicely complemented by legislation we have named the Americans with Abilities Act (AWAA). Instead of focusing on disabilities that need protection, the AWAA seeks to sustain and foster newfound abilities made possible by the fruits of medicine and neuroscience.

Aprendiz com deficiência

Cartilha sobre questões de pessoas com necessidades especiais.

Brazilian law of inclusion: an applied analysis of the correlation of bioethical principles / Ley brasileña de inclusión: un análisis aplicado de la correlación de los principios de la bioética / Lei brasileira de inclusão: uma análise aplicada da correlação dos princípios de bioética

Abstract: Objective: The present study aims to analyse whether bioethical principles are present in the Brazilian Law of Inclusion of the Disabled Person. Methods: The study is based on a textual analysis of Law No. 13.146, of July 6, 2015 (Brazilian Law of Inclusion) using a content analysis technique regarding the bioethical principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, justice and autonomy. A qualitative analysis was conducted based on the concepts of these bioethical principles and their expression in the articles laid down in the Statute of the Disabled Person. Results: The obtained results demonstrate that the primary articles of the Brazilian Law of Inclusion correlate with the aforementioned bioethical principles according to the conceptualisation of each principle. Conclusion: The articles of the Brazilian Law of Inclusion, published on July 6, 2015, under the provisions of the Federal Constitution of 1988 and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, demonstrate a correlation with the stated bioethical principles.

Resumen: Objetivo: El presente estudio pretende analizar si los principios bioéticos están presentes en la Ley brasileña de inclusión de personas con discapacidad. Métodos: El estudio se basa en un análisis textual de la Ley nº 13.146 de 6 de julio de 2015 (Ley brasileña de inclusión) mediante una técnica de análisis de contenido sobre los principios bioéticos de beneficencia, no maleficencia, justicia y autonomía. Se realizó un análisis cualitativo basado en los conceptos de estos principios bioéticos y su expresión en los artículos establecidos en el Estatuto del Discapacitado. Resultados: Los resultados obtenidos muestran que los artículos primarios de la Ley de Inclusión brasileña se correlacionan con los principios bioéticos mencionados, según la conceptualización de cada principio. Conclusión: Los artículos de la Ley de Inclusión brasileña, publicada el 6 de julio de 2015, en virtud de las disposiciones de la Constitución Federal de 1988 y de la Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad, demuestran una correlación con los principios bioéticos enunciados.

Resumo: Objetivo: O presente estudo tem por objetivo analisar se os princípios bioéticos estão presentes na Lei Brasileira de Inclusão da Pessoa com Deficiência. Métodos: O estudo é baseado em uma análise textual da Lei nº 13.146, de 6 de julho de 2015 (Lei Brasileira de Inclusão) utilizando uma técnica de análise de conteúdo relativa aos princípios bioéticos de beneficência, não maleficência, justiça e autonomia. Uma análise qualitativa foi realizada com base nos conceitos destes princípios bioéticos e sua expressão nos artigos estabelecidos no Estatuto da Pessoa Deficiente. Resultados: Os resultados obtidos demonstram que os artigos primários da Lei de Inclusão brasileira se correlacionam com os princípios bioéticos acima mencionados, de acordo com a conceituação de cada princípio. Conclusão: Os artigos da Lei Brasileira de Inclusão, publicados em 6 de julho de 2015, sob as disposições da Constituição Federal de 1988 e da Convenção sobre os Direitos das Pessoas com Deficiência, demonstram uma correlação com os princípios bioéticos declarados.

Federal Incentives to Reform Long-Term Care Under the Affordable Care Act: State Adoption of the Balancing Incentive Program, 2011-2014.

OBJECTIVES: The Balancing Incentive Program (BIP) was an optional program for states within the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to promote Medicaid-funded home and community-based services (HCBS) for older adults and persons with disabilities. Twenty-one states opted to participate in BIP, including several states steadfastly opposed to the health insurance provisions of the Affordable Care Act. This study focused on identifying what factors were associated with states' participation in this program. METHODS: Event history analysis was used to model state adoption of BIP from 2011 to 2014. A range of potential factors was considered representing states' economic, political, and programmatic conditions. RESULTS: The results indicate that states with a higher percentage of Democrats in the state legislature, fewer state employees per capita, and more nursing facility beds were more likely to adopt BIP. In addition, states with fewer home health agencies per capita, that devoted smaller proportions of Medicaid long-term care spending to HCBS, and that had more Money Follows the Person transitions were also more likely to pursue BIP. DISCUSSION: The findings highlight the role of partisanship, administrative capacity, and program history in state BIP adoption decisions. The inclusion of BIP in the Affordable Care Act may have deterred some states from participating in the program due to partisan opposition to the legislation. To encourage the adoption of optional HCBS programs, federal policymakers should consider the role of financial incentives, especially for states with limited bureaucratic capacity and that have made less progress rebalancing Medicaid long-term services and supports.

La representación del apoyo de la persona con discapacidad: el nuevo esquema de la capacidad jurídica en el Perú / The representation of the support of the person with disability: the new scheme of legal capacity in Peru / A representação do apoio à pessoa com incapacidade: o novo esquema da capacidade jurídica no Peru

Resumen Desde 2018, por el Decreto Legislativo 1384, Perú cuenta con un nuevo tratamiento de la capacidad en el Código Civil, que se adecua a las directrices en pro de la autonomía y la plena capacidad jurídica de las personas con discapacidad, concordando la legislación nacional a la Convención Internacional de los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad. El régimen de sustitución de la voluntad de las personas incapaces es reemplazado por un modelo social mediante apoyos y salvaguardias, un modelo inclusivo, democrático, acorde al respeto a los derechos humanos de todos los ciudadanos (dignidad e igualdad), partiendo del reconocimiento de la autonomía de la persona y su derecho a tomar sus propias decisiones, así como el derecho a equivocarse. Se desarrolla la función del apoyo en favor de la persona con discapacidad, analizando sus facultades de representación. Partimos del principio que el apoyo no reemplaza la manifestación de voluntad, solo la facilita e interpreta. Como una figura de asistencia, el apoyo colabora en una adecuada manifestación de voluntad, con el fin de que la persona con discapacidad ejerza su capacidad jurídica, disfrutando sus derechos y libertades.

Abstract Capacity is a subject of transversal interest in Law, it is present in all its fields. It is an attribute that every subject has through which he/she can perform acts that are not prohibited. Since 2018, by Legislative Decree 1384, we have a new treatment of capacity in the Civil Code that is in line with the guidelines in favor of the autonomy and full legal capacity of persons with disabilities, aligning national legislation to the International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The regime of substitution of the will of incapable persons is replaced by a social model through supports and safeguards. We are facing an inclusive, democratic model, according to the respect for the human rights of all citizens (dignity and equality), based on the principle that people with disabilities have full exercise capacity in equal conditions in each and every aspect of their lives, recognizing their right to make their own decisions as well as the right to make mistakes. The function of the support in favor of the disabled person is developed, analyzing their powers of representation. We start from the principle that the support does not replace the manifestation of will, it only interprets it and collaborates in an adequate manifestation of will so that the person with disability can exercise his legal capacity, enjoying his rights and freedoms.

Resumo Desde 2018, pelo Decreto Legislativo 1384, o Peru conta com um novo tratamento da capacidade no Código Civil, que se adequa às diretrizes em prol da autonomia e da plena capacidade jurídica das pessoas com incapacidade, colocando de acordo a legislação nacional com a Convenção Internacional dos Direitos das Pessoas com Incapacidade. O regime de substituição da vontade das pessoas incapazes é trocado por um modelo social mediante apoios e salvaguardas, um modelo inclusivo, democrático, de acordo com o respeito aos direitos humanos de todos os cidadãos (dignidade e igualdade), partindo do reconhecimento da autonomia da pessoa e seu direito de tomar suas próprias decisões, assim como o direito de equivocar-se. Desenvolve-se a função de apoio em favor da pessoa com incapacidade, analisando suas faculdades de representação. Partimos do princípio que o apoio não substitui a manifestação de vontade, somente a facilita e interpreta. Como uma figura de assistência, o apoio colabora para uma adequada manifestação de vontade, com ela finalidade de que a pessoa com incapacidade exerça sua capacidade jurídica, desfrutando seus direitos e liberdades.

Legislation for disabled people in Brazil: from human dignity to social inclusion: advancing capabilities as an ethical imperative / Legislación para los discapacitados en Brasil: de la dignidad humana a la inclusión social: el avance de las capacidades como imperativo ético / Legislação para os incapacitados no Brasil: da dignidade humana à inclusão social: o avanço das capacidades como imperativo ético

Abstract The study analyzes the ethical and legal basis of Brazilian legislation for people with disabilities and verifies whether the instruments used therein are in line with national and international law. It also investigates the coherence and cohesion of the law and its ethical norms to build an inclusive and just society. Through an exploratory and integrative review, it analyzed the legal provisions in force in Brazil published on the official websites of the Brazilian federal government and available on the Internet. It was evaluated whether the definition used for persons with disabilities follows the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Also, whether it is necessary to evaluate disabilities and who should perform this task professionally. Thirty-three legal norms were found, among which only three laws and two decrees are in line with the recommendations of the UN Convention. It is necessary to review the existing norms and promote the consolidation of laws, decrees, ordinances and normative instructions regarding the rights of persons with disabilities in a uniform manner, on an adequate technical-scientific basis. This review should be consistent with the provisions of the 1988 Federal Constitution, the International Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Brazilian Inclusion Law.

Resumen El estudio analiza el fundamento ético y jurídico de la legislación brasileña para las personas con discapacidad y comprueba si los instrumentos allí utilizados se ajustan al Derecho nacional e internacional. Además, investiga la coherencia y cohesión de la ley y sus normas éticas para construir una sociedad inclusiva y justa. Mediante revisión exploratoria e integrativa, analizó las disposiciones legales vigentes en Brasil publicadas en los sitios web oficiales del gobierno federal brasileño y disponibles en Internet. Se evaluó si la definición utilizada para las personas con discapacidad sigue la Convención de las Naciones Unidas sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad. También, si es necesario evaluar las discapacidades y quién debe realizar esa tarea profesionalmente. Se encontraron 33 normas legales, entre las cuales solo tres leyes y dos decretos se ajustan a las recomendaciones de la Convención de las Naciones Unidas. Es necesario revisar las normas existentes y promover la consolidación de las leyes, decretos, ordenanzas e instrucciones normativas relativas a los derechos de las personas discapacitadas de manera uniforme, sobre una base técnico-científica adecuada. Esta revisión debe ser coherente con las disposiciones de la Constitución Federal de 1988, la Convención Internacional sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad y la Ley de Inclusión brasileña.

Resumo O estudo analisa o fundamento ético e jurídico da legislação brasileira para as pessoas com incapacidade e comprova se os instrumentos ali utilizados se ajustam ao Direito nacional e internacional. Além disso, investiga a coerência e coesão da lei e suas normas éticas para construir uma sociedade inclusiva e justa. Mediante revisão exploratória e integrativa, analisou as disposições legais vigentes no Brasil publicadas nos sites web oficiais do governo federal brasileiro e disponíveis na Internet. Avaliou-se se a definição utilizada para as pessoas com incapacidade segue a Convenção das Nações Unidas sobre os Direitos das Pessoas com Incapacidade. Também, se é necessário avaliar as incapacidades e quem deve realizar essa tarefa profissionalmente. Se encontraram 33 normas legais, entre as quais somente três leis e dois decretos se ajustam às recomendações da Convenção das Nações Unidas. É necessário revisar as normas existentes e promover a consolidação das leis, decretos, regulamentos e instruções normativas relativas aos direitos das pessoas incapacitadas de maneira uniforme, sobre uma base técnico-científica adequada. Esta revisão deve ser coerente com as disposições da Constituição Federal de 1988, a Convenção Internacional sobre os Direitos das Pessoas com Incapacidade e a Lei de Inclusão brasileira.

Responding to the Needs of People with Disabilities in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Community Perspectives from Centers for Independent Living.

Centers for Independent Living (CILs) are federally funded, community-based organizations designed and operated by people with disabilities that provide individual and systems advocacy, peer support, information and referral, independent living skills training, and transition services throughout the U.S. and its territories. Centers for Independent Living therefore offer a rich and detailed perspective on the needs of people with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this brief report, we summarize COVID-19-related issues raised by 144 CIL administrators and staff in a national survey conducted in April and May 2020 and discuss their research and policy implications. Respondents voiced concerns about health and safety, long-term supportive services, social isolation, and economic insecurity. In the words of one center director, "The pandemic has pulled back the curtain on the depth of need in our local disability community."