In Vitro Effect of Anodization of Titanium Abutments on Color Parameters and Color Difference of Lithium Disilicate All-Ceramic Crowns.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the effect of the anodization of titanium abutments on the color parameters and color difference of lithium disilicate (LDS) all-ceramic crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 19 straight abutments were divided into two groups: anodized (n = 9) and non-anodized control (n = 9), with one hybrid zirconia abutment as a reference. Anodization was achieved by applying 63 V energy using seven 9 V flat batteries in series, with an electrolyte solution comprising 1 g trisodium phosphate in 250 mL distilled water for 5 s, resulting in a gold-yellow color. Abutments were then scanned, and full-contour monolithic IPS e.max maxillary central incisor crowns were fabricated with 2 mm thickness and glazed. Reflectance was measured using a spectroradiometer, and color coordinates (L*, a*, b*, h*, and C*) were calculated using CS-10W software. Color differences of the crowns in both groups were quantified using the CIEDE2000 (ΔE00) color difference formula and analyzed by t-test (α = 0.05) compared to the standard sample. RESULTS: The L*, a*, b*, and c* parameters in anodized abutments were significantly higher than those in non-anodized abutments, while the h* parameter in anodized abutments was significantly lower than that in non-anodized abutments (p < 0.001 for all). There was a significant difference in ΔE00 of the two groups (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Anodization of titanium abutments improved the color parameters of LDS all-ceramic crowns and significantly decreased their ΔE compared with non-anodized abutments.

Optimal Hydrofluoric Acid Etching Duration and Impact of Silane/Adhesive on Profilometric Properties and Bonding to Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramics.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the surface roughness, surface free energy (SFE), and shear bond strength (SBS) on a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic surface following varying etching protocols (time variation) and application of silane either with or without adhesive material. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Lithium disilicate glassceramic (LDGC) computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) blocks were cut using a slow-speed cutting mechanism. CAD/CAM blocks were then evaluated for surface roughness, 6 groups (n=20); SFE,12 groups (n=5); and SBS, 10 groups (n=10). The cut CAD/CAM blocks were randomly allocated to 28 groups. Groups were based on the following: 30 or 90 seconds of etching with 9% hydrofluoric acid (HF); application or absence of silane coupling agent (Sil); and application or absence of adhesive (Adh).The control group (Cont) had untreated surfaces. Unetched surfaces were surveyed with only silane (Sil), only adhesive (Adh), or silane+adhesive (SilAdh). Further etched groups were HF30 with HF for 30 seconds, HF30-Sil, HF30-Adh, and HF30-SilAdh. Alternative 90-second etching times produced similar groups: HF90, HF90-Sil, HF90-Adh, and HF90-SilAdh. A digital profilometer was used to assess the surface roughness of specimens, and two readings were recorded. Sessile drop analysis was used to examine SFE specimens, and the OWRK model was modified to measure liquid surface tension. A universal testing machine (UltraTester, Ultradent Products, Inc, South Jordan, UT, USA) was utilized for the SBS test, with the crosshead speed set at 0.5 mm/min until failure. Representative treated specimens from each group were submitted to surface morphological evaluation and chemical analysis using scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDXS) (n=3). After data collection, evaluation using one- or two-way analysis of variance and the post-hoc Tukey test (α=5%) was conducted. RESULTS: A longer etching time of 90 seconds produced a rougher surface. After the 90-second etching process, SFE displayed the greatest values; nevertheless, the use of silane did not affect SFE. For every group examined, the application of silane followed by adhesive resulted in an increase in SBS and more stable bonding over time. SEM/EDXS showed that etching times did affect the amount of cerium on the surface and altered surface morphology. CONCLUSIONS: Higher and more consistent bond strengths have been observed with longer etching periods. Silane and adhesive application on the ceramic surface showed stronger and enhanced bond strength, specifically when longer etching times were employed.

Internal fit and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic implant-supported hybrid abutment crowns with custom-milled screw-channels on Titanium-base: in-vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Advancements in digital dentistry helped in custom-milling screw-channels in implant-supported restorations; however, the fit of these restorations is still unclear especially for contemporary computer aided designing/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials. This study aimed to compare the internal and marginal fit of Ultra translucent multilayered zirconia versus lithium disilicate implant-supported hybrid abutment crowns (HACs) constructed with custom-milled screw-channels on Titanium-base. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 24 HACs with custom-milled screw-channels were constructed from lithium disilicate (Group LDS) and Ultra translucent multilayered zirconia (Group UT) using digital workflow (n = 12). The internal and marginal gaps of HACs on their corresponding Titanium-bases were assessed using replica technique and stereomicroscope, respectively. After testing for normality, quantitative data were expressed as mean and standard deviation and compared using independent t-test at a level of significance (P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between Group LDS and Group UT in terms of marginal and internal fit. The internal and marginal gaps in both groups were within the accepted values reported in literature. CONCLUSIONS: UT and LDS HACs with custom-milled screw-channels demonstrated comparable and acceptable internal fit and marginal adaptations to Ti-base, which lied within the range reported in literature.

The effect of two preparation designs on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of two types of ceramic crowns using CAD/CAM technology (In vitro study).

BACKGROUND: Recently, prosthodontic approaches involve more conservative procedures that include less invasive finish line preparations that use less ceramic thickness. AIM OF THE STUDY: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of vertical preparation and modified vertical preparation designs on the marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of two types of ceramic crowns using CAD/CAM technology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two typodont maxillary first premolars were embedded in acrylic resin. Forty positive replicas of epoxy resin dies were used that were divided into two groups depending on the preparation design (n = 20); Group V (Vertical): dies with feather edge finish line and Group MV (Modified vertical): dies with feather edge finish line, where a reverse shoulder of 1 mm depth was placed on the buccal surface 1.5 mm from the occlusal surface. Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups according to the type of ceramic material (n = 10): Subgroup Va and subgroup MVa for lithium disilicate (e.max CAD) and subgroup Vb and subgroup MVb for zirconia (zolid ht+). Crown restorations were made with CAD-CAM technology. The marginal adaptation was assessed using a stereomicroscope both prior to cementation and after cementation and aging. Fracture resistance was tested with a universal testing machine, and the data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Marginal adaptation showed no significant differences between subgroups before or after cementation and aging. Three-way ANOVA indicated that preparation design (p = 0.516) and material (p = 0.269) had no significant effect, but cementation had a significant effect (p < 0.0001) on the marginal adaptation. According to two-way ANOVA test, Subgroup (MVb) showed the highest result followed by subgroup (Vb) and subgroub (MVa) and the least was subgroub (Va). Fracture modes showed no significant differences among the subgroups (p = 0.982). CONCLUSIONS: Marginal adaptation of lithium disilicate and zirconia crowns remained clinically acceptable regardless of preparation design. While the modified vertical preparation with a reverse shoulder notably enhanced the fracture resistance of both materials, with zirconia demonstrating superior fracture resistance compared to lithium disilicate with average values exceeding premolar biting force.

Fracture resistance and fractographic analysis of pressable glass-ceramics with different partial coverage designs for maxillary premolars.

BACKGROUND: Partial coverage concepts have met the main goal of conservative dentistry. Vonlays, which combine features of veneers and onlays, are a recent alternative to full coverage designs and overlay partial coverage restorations. This in vitro study was conducted to compare the fracture resistance of the newly introduced pressable zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate with pressable lithium disilicate ceramic and to determine the optimal preparation design for partial coverage on upper premolars. METHODS: Fifty-two duplicated epoxy resin dies were prepared following vonlay and overlay preparation guidelines. For each preparation (n = 26), the specimens were divided into two subgroups to be restored with lithium disilicate (IPS e.max Press) or zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (Vita Ambria) (n = 13 each). Ceramic vonlays and overlays were bonded using dual cure resin cement, subjected to thermomechanical fatigue, and the load to fracture was tested by using a universal testing machine. The specimens were fractographically analyzed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The normality of the fracture resistance data was checked using the Shapiro‒Wilk test and Q‒Q plots, and two-way ANOVA was used to assess the effect of the type of preparation and ceramic material on the fracture resistance. RESULTS: The group of overlays restored with zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate showed the highest mean fracture load (1218.69 N), while the group of vonlays restored with lithium disilicate had the lowest mean fracture resistance (967.15 N). The effect of preparation design and material type on fracture resistance was significant for both factors, p = 0.003 and p < 0.0001, respectively. Different features of the fracture surfaces, such as arrest lines, hackles, and directions of crack propagation, were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate exhibited greater resistance to fracture compared to lithium disilicate, making it a potential substitute for partial coverage restorations. Additionally, the overlay showed superior fracture resistance when compared to the vonlay preparation design.

Three-Dimensional Optical Study on the Effects of Microwave Glazing on Surface Roughness of Zirconia-Reinforced Glass Ceramic.

BACKGROUND This 3-dimensional (3D) optical study aimed to evaluate the effects of microwave glazing on the surface roughness of zirconia-reinforced glass. Glazed surfaces of ceramic provide a smooth and esthetically superior restoration. There are many methods of glazing. However, this study aims to evaluate the effect of microwave glazing on ceramic restorations over conventional oven and hand polishing. MATERIAL AND METHODS A sample size of 90 ceramic material tiles was derived according to the standard sample size formula. The 3 dental ceramics used were IPS e.max CAD (lithium disilicate ceramic; IvoclarVivadent), Suprinity (zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate; VITA Zahnfabrik), and Celtra Duo zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate; Dentsply Sirona). Each group was further divided equally to undergo conventional oven glazing, hand polishing, and microwave glazing. The final glazed surfaces were then evaluated for surface roughness with the Ra parameter, using a Contour GT 3D Optical Microscope (Bruker) and 3D non-contact surface metrology with interferometry. RESULTS The ANOVA test for intergroup comparison showed microwave glazing was a significantly better glazing method than conventional oven and hand polishing (P<0.05). A statistically significant difference was shown between conventional and microwave glazing; however, the difference was greater between conventionally glazed and hand-polished specimens. Furthermore, a highly significant difference between microwave-glazed and hand-polished specimens was observed. CONCLUSIONS Results showed that irrespective of the ceramic, microwave-glazed ceramics were better than traditional oven-glazed ceramics, and hand-polishing resulted in a rougher surface than glazing. Irrespective of the surface treatment methods, IPS e.max CAD ceramic showed a relatively smoother surface than did Suprinity and Celtra Duo.

Does the internal surface treatment technique for enhanced bonding affect the color, transparency, and surface roughness of ultra-transparent zirconia?

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of different surface treatments and thicknesses on the color, transparency, and surface roughness of ultra-transparent zirconia. METHODS: A total of 120 Katana ultra-translucent multi-layered zirconia specimens were divided into 12 groups according to the thickness (0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 mm) and surface treatment (control, airborne particle abrasion [APA], lithium disilicate coating, and glaze on). Color difference (ΔE00) and relative translucency parameter (RTP00) were calculated using a digital spectrophotometer. The surface roughness (Ra, Rq, Sa, and Sq) was measured using a non-contact profile scanner. The surface morphologies and microstructures of the samples were observed using a tungsten filament scanning electron microscope. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc multiple comparisons and Pearson's correlation (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The results showed that the surface treatment, ceramic thickness, and their interactions had significant effects on ΔE00 and RTP00 (p < 0.001). The surface treatment significantly altered the micromorphology and increased the surface roughness of the ceramic samples. APA exhibited the lowest transparency, largest color difference, and highest surface roughness. Zirconia with 0.3 mm and 0.7 mm thicknesses showed strong negative correlations between Sa and RTP00. CONCLUSIONS: The three internal surface treatments significantly altered the surface roughness, color difference, and transparency of ultra-transparent zirconia. As the thickness increased, the influence of the inner surface treatment on the color difference and transparency of zirconia decreased. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: For new zirconia internal surface treatment technologies, in addition to considering the enhancement effect on the bonding properties, the potential effects on the color and translucency of high-transparency zirconia should also be considered. Appropriately increasing the thickness of zirconia restorations helps minimize the effect of surface treatment on the optical properties.

Effect of Successive At-home Bleaching Sessions on the Surface Properties, Biaxial Flexural Strength, and Reliability of CAD-CAM Monolithic Materials.

Although at-home bleaching can recover the optical properties of stained CAD-CAM monolithic materials, little is known about its impact on their surface and mechanical properties, especially when successive sessions are performed. This study evaluated the effect of successive at-home bleaching sessions on the microhardness, roughness, topography, biaxial flexural strength (BFS), and reliability of CAD-CAM monolithic materials. Disks from Lava Ultimate (LU), Vita Enamic (VE), and IPS Empress CAD (EMP) were fabricated and submitted to up to three bleaching sessions. At-home bleaching was performed with 10% carbamide peroxide, and each session consisted of one application for 10 hours/day for 14 days. The analyses of the aforementioned parameters were assessed before and after the first, second, and third bleaching sessions, except for BFS, which was evaluated at baseline and after the third session. The Weibull modulus was calculated from the BFS data. The microhardness of the three materials as well as the roughness of LU were not affected by the sessions, whereas the roughness of VE and EMP increased from the second session. All materials displayed topographic changes, which became more pronounced with the increase in the number of sessions. Although bleaching decreased the BFS of the materials, it did not adversely affect their reliability. Successive at-home bleaching sessions with the protocol used in the present study cannot be considered a safe procedure for the materials evaluated.

Evaluation of vertical marginal discrepancy and load-to-failure of monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate laminate veneers manufactured in different thicknesses.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of monolithic zirconia laminate veneers (MZLV) compared to lithium disilicate laminate veneers (LDLV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty resin replicas, each prepared with depths of 0.5 mm, 0.7 mm, and 1 mm, were produced using a 3D printer from acrylic teeth. Laminate veneers of these thicknesses were milled from pre-sintered monolithic zirconia (3rd generation) and lithium disilicate blocks. The intaglio surface of MZLV was treated with air abrasion using 110 µm diameter silica-modified aluminium oxide particles and ceramic primer, while LDLV was etched with etchant gel and treated with the ceramic primer before cementation with resin cement. Vertical marginal discrepancy (VMD) was assessed using a stereomicroscope, and a load-to-failure test was conducted using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were evaluated macroscopically on fractured surfaces. Data were analysed statistically using Two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni correction (α = 0.05). RESULTS: LDLV samples exhibited significantly larger VMD compared to MZLV samples across all thicknesses, especially in cervical, palatal, and mean data. Within the LDLV group, load-to-fracture values for 0.7 mm and 1.0 mm thicknesses were similar, whereas for 0.5 mm thickness, it was significantly lower. In the MZLV group, load-to-fracture values were lower for 0.7 mm and 1.0 mm thicknesses compared to LDLV, but higher for 0.5 mm thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Material choice and restoration thickness significantly influence laminate veneer restorations' success. MZLV generally exhibits superior vertical marginal fit compared to LDLV, with varying load-to-failure values across different thicknesses. Clinical management of debonding in MZLV is simpler compared to restoration fracture in LDLV. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Considering clinical factors, MZLV may be a preferable option to LDLV for this restoration with the thickness of 0.5 mm.

A comparison of the radiopacities of CAD-CAM restoratives: Effect of thickness.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiopacities of CAD-CAM materials using digital techniques. METHODS: Five different CAD-CAM materials were used (Cerasmart, LAVA Ultimate, Cerec Blocs C, Tetric CAD, and IPS e.max CAD) in this study (n= 5). For each group, samples with thicknesses of 1 and 2 mm were prepared. As a control, tooth slices with 1 and 2 mm thicknesses and a 99.5% pure aluminum step wedge were used. The samples, tooth slices, and step wedges were placed on a photostimulable phosphor plate. Radiographs were taken at 30 cm distance with 7 mA, 70 kVp, and 0.32 ms exposure time. The images were analyzed using the ImageJ software to measure the mean gray values. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis H test and the Mann-Whitney U test (P< 0.05). RESULTS: In the comparison of CAD-CAM materials with 1 and 2-mm thicknesses, the highest radiopacity value was seen in LAVA Ultimate samples (2.67 ± 0.05 for 1 mm samples: 5.74 ± 0.13 for 2 mm samples). The lowest value in 1 mm samples was seen in IPS e.max (0.59 ± 0.07), and in 2 mm samples, in Cerec Blocs C samples (1.49 ± 0.11). The results showed that the radiopacity values of the samples were associated with increased thicknesses. The 2 mm samples' radiopacity values were statistically significantly higher compared with the 1 mm samples. All samples except IPS e.max CAD and Cerec Blocs C had higher radiopacity than dentin (P< 0.05). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The radiopacity values were affected by thickness and type of materials. Comprehensive knowledge about the radiopacity of materials enables the selection of appropriate materials to achieve clinical success, which serves as a useful diagnostic aid in determining the long-term durability of restorations.

Microhardness, diametral tensile strength and color stability of heated resin composites used for luting ceramic veneers.

PURPOSE: To evaluate color change in ceramic veneers luted to enamel with light-cured, dual-cured resin luting agents, or heated resin composites, as well as to evaluate microhardness and diametral tensile strength of these luting agents. METHODS: For color analysis, 0.5 mm-thick leucite-reinforced glass ceramic veneers (IPS Empress CAD) were cemented onto 40 bovine dental blocks (n= 10) using RelyX Ultimate (RU) or RelyX Veneer (RV) resin-based luting agents, or Gradia Direct (GD) and Palfique Lx5 (P) heated resin composites. After luting, the specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10,000 cycles). Color analysis was performed before and after thermocycling (L*, a*, b*, ΔEab, ΔE00). For the microhardness (Knoop) and diametral tensile strength tests, specimens (Ø 6 x 2 mm) were made (RU, RV, GD, and P). The specimens were subdivided into eight groups (n=10) and light-cured through different ceramic sheets (thicknesses of 0.5 mm or 1.5 mm). Knoop microhardness was performed on the top surface in a microhardness tester, and diametral tensile strength on a universal testing machine. Data were submitted to statistical analysis, using two-way ANOVA, Tukey, and Kruskal-Wallis tests (α= 0.05). RESULTS: For the general color alteration, there was no statistically significant difference between the luting materials (ΔEab, P= 0.57; ΔE00, P= 0.50). There was no interaction between luting agent and thermocycling, for L* (P= 0.87), a* (P= 0.97) and b* (P= 0.95) values. Thermocycling significantly affected only the L* values (P= 0.047), which increased after the cycles. For microhardness, there was a statistically significant difference considering luting agents and ceramic thickness (P< 0.001). GD heated resin composite presented significantly lower microhardness values than all other materials, at both ceramic thicknesses. At a thickness of 1.5 mm, RU cement had higher microhardness values than RV and P materials. Diametral tensile strength was significantly influenced by luting agent (P= 0.01), but not by ceramic thickness (P= 0.55). Diametral tensile strength of GD resin composite was higher than that of the RU, but neither of these two materials differed from RV and P. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Heated resin composite, used as luting agents, showed similar color stability to light-cured and dual-cure resin cements, however its microhardness was affected by ceramic thickness.

Qualitative surface roughness of lithium disilicate endo-crown for pulpotomized primary molars.

Rehabilitation of pulpotomized primary molars with an appropriate restoration is essential for recovering function and safeguarding the durability of the treatment. This study aimed to assess and compare the surface roughness of stainless steel (ST) crowns, zirconia (ZR) crowns, fiberglass (FG) crowns, and lithium disilicate (LD) endo-crowns as a restoration for pulpotomized primary molars also, evaluating the surface roughness of their antagonists. Sixty pulpotomized primary mandibular first molars were used for qualitative surface roughness evaluation and divided into four groups (n = 15/group) according to the crown type (group-ST, group-ZR, group-FG, group-LD). While the other sixty sound, unprepared primary maxillary first molars were used for evaluation of their surface roughness against the tested crowns. Specimens' preparation and cementation were carried out according to each crown type and manufacturer's instructions. The surface roughness was done using a two-body wear test. The data were statistically analyzed. All tested crowns showed an increased change in surface roughness, except group-ZR, which had the least change in surface roughness after mechanical wear with no statistically significant difference(P = 0.681). All crown types significantly increased the surface roughness of their antagonists after mechanical wear, except group-ST which showed insignificant affection (p ≥ 0.05). Zirconia crowns and lithium disilicate endo-crowns had the least change in surface roughness compared to other groups while SSCs showed the least tooth loss in the antagonist enamel.

Effects of Artificial Aging of Direct Resin Nano-Hybrid Composite on Mean Bond Strength Values for Veneer Ceramic Samples.

BACKGROUND This study investigates the effect of artificial aging of direct resin nanohybrid composites on mean bond strength values for veneer ceramic samples. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ninety direct nanohybrid composite resin (Tetric N-Ceram) cylindrical discs were divided into 5 groups (n=18 each) based on aging cycles (thermocycling), as follows: TC=no aging (control), T1=850, T3=2500, T6=5000, and T12=10000 cycles, representing 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of clinical usage, respectively. Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS e.max Press) cylindrical discs were cemented to resin discs using resin cement (Variolink N) after surface treatments (ceramic etching, silaning, composite abrasion). Differences in means between subgroups were calculated using one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey honestly significant differences post hoc test. Differences were considered statistically significant with a P value ≤0.05. RESULTS The highest SBS between ceramic and aged composite was observed at 1 month (m=20.35) but did not differ significantly from the control group (m=20.97). For all other subgroups (3, 6, 12 months) SBS was significantly less than that of the control (P≤0.05). At 1 and 3 months, cohesive failures were more common, whereas adhesive failures were more common in 6- and 12-month-old composites. CONCLUSIONS SBS of aged composites was less than that of non-aged composites, with SBS decreasing proportionally as the resin aged. When cementing a ceramic restoration over existing composite restorations, those older than 1 month should be removed and replaced with new ones.

Do all ceramic and composite CAD-CAM materials exhibit equal bonding properties to implant Ti-base materials? An Interfacial Fracture Toughness Study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the interfacial fracture toughness (IFT) with or without aging, of four different classes of CAD-CAM ceramic and composite materials bonded with self-adhesive resin cement to titanium alloy characteristic of implant abutments. METHODS: High translucent zirconia (Katana; KAT), lithium disilicate-based glass-ceramic (IPS. emax.CAD; EMX), polymer-infiltrated ceramic network material (PICN) (Vita Enamic; ENA), and dispersed filler composite (Cerasmart 270; CER) were cut into equilateral triangular prisms and bonded to titanium prisms with identical dimensions using Panavia SA Cement Universal. The surfaces were pretreated following the manufacturers' recommendations and developed interfacial area ratio (Sdr) of the pretreated surfaces was measured. IFT was determined using the Notchless Triangular Prism test in a water bath at 36 °C before and after thermocycling (10,000 cycles) (n = 40 samples/material). RESULTS: IFT of the materials ranged from 0.80 ± 0.25 to 1.10 ± 0.21 MPa.m1/2 before thermocycling and from 0.71 ± 0.24 to 1.02 ± 0.25 MPa.m1/2 after thermocycling. There was a statistical difference between IFT of CER and the two top performers in each scenario: KAT and EMX before aging, and KAT and ENA after aging. Thermocycling significantly decreased IFT of EMX. The Weibull modulus of IFT was similar for all materials and remained so after thermocycling. Sdr measurements revealed that ENA (7.60)>Ti (4.97)>CER (2.85)>KAT (1.09)=EMX (0.96). SIGNIFICANCE: Dispersed filler CAD-CAM composite showed lower performance than the other materials. Aging only affected IFT of Li-Si glass-ceramic, whereas zirconia and PICN performed equally well, probably due to their chemical bonding potential and surface roughness respectively.

Influence of gingival color on the color differences of dental laminate veneers.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The effect of various gingival colors on the color differences of laminate veneers is unclear and comparative evaluations should be documented. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the influence of different gingival colors on the color differences of laminate veneers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five maxillary typodonts were used to obtain study models using 5 different gingival colors: light pink (LP), dark pink (DP), orange (Or), brown (Br), and violet (V). A total of 45 laminate veneers were milled using A1-shaded lithium disilicate ceramic and cemented on natural tooth-colored substrates. Color parameters were assessed using a spectroradiometer at 3 measurement areas (cervical third, mid-third, and incisal third) along the midline of laminate veneer with a focus measuring diameter of 1 mm. Color differences (∆E*ab and ∆E00) were calculated and compared with perceptibility (PT: ∆E*ab=1.22, ΔE00=0.81) and acceptability (AT: ∆E*ab=2.66, ΔE00=1.77) visual thresholds. Color variation data were statistically analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (α=.05). RESULTS: Two-way ANOVA results of the ∆E*ab values revealed significant interaction between the gingival color and the measurement area (P=.002). The ∆E*ab and ΔE00 values of laminate veneers were significantly higher in the LP-V group that presented values above AT (P<.001). Measurement area significantly influenced ∆E values of laminate veneers (P<.001). Greater ∆E values were registered at the measurement area of the cervical third in the groups of LP-DP, LP-Br, LP-V, and Or-V. Regardless of the measurement area, ∆E00 values below AT were obtained for the gingival color groups of LP-Or, DP-Or, DP-Br, and DP-V. CONCLUSIONS: Gingival color influenced the color differences of laminate veneers. When the gingival color was a darker gingival color, rather than light pink, the color difference increased, especially at the measurement area of the cervical third.

Effect of simulated gastric acid exposure on the hardness, topographic, and colorimetric properties of machinable and pressable zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramics.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The effects of gastric acid on the hardness, topographic, and colorimetric properties of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramics (ZLSs) for dental restorations remain unknown. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of simulated gastric acid exposure on the microhardness, surface roughness, color stability, and relative translucency of ZLSs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two pressable ZLSs (VITA AMBRIA, VA and Celtra Press, CP) and 2 machinable ZLSs (VITA Suprinity, VS and Celtra Duo, CD)(n=64) were randomly allocated to artificial saliva (control) or gastric juice immersion groups simulating 10 and 20 years of clinical exposure. Microhardness (Hv) was measured with a Vickers hardness device, and surface roughness (Sa) was recorded with an optical profilometer. The color stability (ΔE00) and relative translucency parameter (RTP) were measured with a spectrophotometer. Data for Hv, Sa, and RTP were analyzed by repeated 2-way ANOVA, and data for ΔE00 were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA. Post hoc comparisons were obtained from Tukey HSD and Student t tests (α=.05). RESULTS: Machinable ZLSs exhibited greater Hv after the simulated gastric acid challenge than pressable ZLSs. Sa was significantly impacted by material type (P=.001), storage media (P=.050), and their interaction (P<.001). ΔE00 was significantly affected by the type of simulated aging media (P<.001). After 20 years of simulated gastric acid aging, all ZLS materials surpassed the ΔE00 perceptibility threshold but did not exceed the ΔE00 acceptability threshold. VS displayed significantly lower RTP than other ZLS materials at all time points (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The topographic and colorimetric characteristics of ZLS were significantly altered by exposure to simulated gastric acid.

Effect of "fast"-crystallization and simultaneous glazing on physicochemical properties of lithium-disilicate CAD/CAM ceramic.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the impact of a "fast" crystallization and simultaneous-glazing on the physicochemical properties of lithium-disilicate CAD/CAM-ceramic. METHODS: Lithium-disilicate bars and crowns (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent) were divided into four groups (n = 30): WG/F (WG=with glaze/F=fast crystallization), NG/F (NG=no glaze), WG/C (C=conventional crystallization), and NG/C. A liquid/powder glaze system was used (IPS Ivocolor®, Ivoclar-Vivadent). Specimens were crystallized (Programat P310, Ivoclar-Vivadent) using the P161 program for C (approx. 20-25 min), and P165 for F (approx. 14-16 min). Bars (n = 30) underwent three-point bending tests (flexural strength-FS in MPa and modulus of elasticity-E in GPa) using a universal testing machine. Crowns were analyzed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after selective etching, and to Raman, FTIR-ATR, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectroscopies to assess chemical composition. RESULTS: For FS, both factors/interaction were statistically significant. C (427.48±42.41 MPa) showed significantly higher values than F (409.82±38.82 MPa). WG (398.32±29.80 MPa) exhibited significantly lower FS than NG (438.21±41.77 MPa). For E data, both factors/interaction were significant. NG (90.28±14.71 GPa) displayed higher E than WG (83.07±5.69 GPa), while C (90.08±12.98 GPa) exhibited higher E than F (83.46±9.40 GPa). NG/C showed the best results for both variables. F groups showed (SEM) porous surfaces and crack-like marks on crystals. FTIR, Raman and XRD spectra confirmed the typical composition of a lithium-disilicate glass ceramic, and some attenuated signals and structural variations (XRD) in WG. CONCLUSIONS: "Fast" crystallization and simultaneous-glazing produced weaker/less-rigid structures with irregular crystals and glassy phases. Simultaneous glazing may have hindered proper thermal distribution during crystallization. SIGNIFICANCE: "Fast" crystallization and simultaneous glazing with non-recommended systems, can adversely affect the final properties of lithium disilicate restorations.

Effect of different occlusal materials on peri-implant stress distribution with different osseointegration condition: A finite element analysis.

AIM: Studies have not been done to evaluate the peri-implant stress exerted by materials(like PEEK and resin matrix ceramics) in different osseointegration conditions. To investigate the effect of different occlusal materials on peri-implant stress distribution with different osseointegration condition using finite element analysis. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Eighteen different 3D FEA models of implant fixed with abutment were created involving 6 different occlusal materials (Heat cured temporary acrylic resin (PMMA), Bis-GMA, PEEK, Lithium disilicate, Resin matrix ceramics and translucent Zirconia) and different osseointegrated conditions (50%, 75%, 100%). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Models were subjected to loading vertically and obliquely followed by evaluation of stress distribution. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The results of the simulation obtained were analysed in terms of Von mises, maximum principal and minimal principal stresses using descriptive stastistics. RESULTS: PMMA (40.14 MPa on vertical loading and 66 MPa on oblique loading) resulted in the highest stresses and lithium disilicate (24 MPa on vertical loading and 52.40 MPa on oblique loading) resulted in least stresses among all the crown materials. Upon oblique loading, von Mises stress increases except for translucent zirconia and lithium disilicate (52.444 MPa on 50%, 47.733 MPa on 75%, and 43.973 MPa on 100% osseointegration). Minimal principal stress values decreased with increase in osseointegration upon oblique loading for PMMA, BisGMA, and PEEK. CONCLUSION: Translucent zirconia and lithium disilicate offer a better stress transmission. Minimal principal stress values of PEEK and BisGMA decreased with increasing osseointegration.

An In Vitro Study of Retention and Marginal Adaptation of Endocrowns With Different Intracoronal Depths.

BACKGROUND: Marginal adaptation and retention of endocrowns are crucial for the success and survival of endocrowns. This study aimed to investigate the effect of different materials and intracoronal depth on the retention and marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic endocrowns. METHODS: Thirty-six mandibular premolar teeth with an average surface area of 64.49 mm2 were prepared to receive CAM/CAM fabricated endocrowns. Samples were divided randomly and equally into groups of lithium disilicate with 2 mm intracoronal depth (LD2), lithium disilicate with 4 mm intracoronal depth (LD4), polymer infiltrated ceramic network with 2 mm intracoronal depth (PICN2) and polymer infiltrated ceramic network with 4 mm intracoronal depth (PICN4). All endocrowns were cemented using ParaCore resin cement with 14N pressure and cured for 20 seconds. Fifty measurements of absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD) were done using a stereomicroscope after cementation. After 24 hours, all samples were subjected to thermocycling before the retention test. This involved using a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min and applying a load of 500N. The maximum force to detach the crown was recorded in newtons and the mode of failure was identified. RESULTS: Two-way ANOVA revealed that the AMD for PICN was statistically significantly better than lithium disilicate (p=0.01). No statistically significant difference was detected in the AMD between the two intracoronal depths (p=0.72). PICN and endocrowns with 4 mm intracoronal depth had statistically significant better retention (p<0.05). 72.22% of the sample suffered from cohesive failures and 10 LD endocrowns suffered adhesive failures. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, we found that different materials and intracoronal depths can indeed influence the retention of CAD/CAM fabricated endocrowns. Based on the controlled setting findings, PICN was found to have better retention and better marginal adaptation than similar lithium disilicate premolar endocrowns.