Phase IB part of LOC-R01, a LOC network non-comparative randomized phase IB/II study testing R-MPV in combination with escalating doses of lenalidomide or ibrutinib for newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients.

BACKGROUND: Results of conventional induction chemotherapies in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) need to be improved. Ibrutinib, a BTK inhibitor, and lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug, have shown promising results at relapse, supporting to further assess their individual use in combination with high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL were randomized to receive four 28-day cycles of ibrutinib or lenalidomide in combination with R-MPV (rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, vincristine and prednisone) in a 3 + 3 design. Responders then received a consolidation with R-Cytarabine and an intensive chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. The objective of the phase IB study was to define the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) based on the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurring during the first induction cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (median age 52) were randomized. Four DLTs were observed: one grade 5 aspergillosis and pneumocystosis, one grade 4 catheter-related infection and two grade 3 increased alanine aminotransferase levels. RP2D of ibrutinib and lenalidomide were 560 mg daily (D3-14 and D17-28) and 15 mg daily (D1-21) respectively, in combination with R-MPV. In both arms, the most frequent grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were hepatic cytolysis, neutropenia and infections. One grade 4 Lyell's syndrome was reported at cycle 2 in the lenalidomide arm. After 4 induction cycles, the overall response rates were 76.9% and 83.3% in the lenalidomide and ibrutinib arm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Targeted induction therapies combining lenalidomide or ibrutinib with R-MPV are feasible for first-line PCNSL. The safety profile is consistent with the known safety profiles of R-MPV and both targeted therapies. The phase II part of the study is ongoing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04446962.

Cellular pattern and orbital fat involvement are possible risk factors for the failure of corticosteroids in patients with pure idiopathic orbital inflammation syndrome: lessons from the French prospective SIOI cohort study (part II).

PURPOSE: To better characterise the effects of corticosteroids on the course of pure idiopathic orbital inflammation syndrome (pIOIS). METHODS: This was a national, multicentre, prospective, non-interventional cohort study (SIOI). Among the 35 patients with histologically proven orbital inflammation who had previously been studied for their IgG4 immunostaining status, we selected those with a negative IgG4 status (ie, pIOIS) who received corticosteroids as single first-line treatment. Clinical, morphological and pathological findings at diagnosis and during follow-up from treatment initiation to study completion were analysed. Patients were assessed for their response to prednisone after the 24-month prospective phase in terms of remission (≤10 mg/d) or failure (>10 mg/d). Daily standard doses of prednisone (DSDP) were calculated at different time-points and compared between response groups. RESULTS: Of the 17 patients with pIOIS included in the final analysis, two-thirds received corticosteroids only. DSDP (mg/kg-day) were significantly higher at the time of failure in eight patients (47%) than in nine (53%) remitting at M24 (0.16 vs 0.045; p: 0.03). Notably, patients with pIOIS with a cellular pattern or orbital fat involvement tended to receive higher daily corticosteroid doses in the event of failure than remission (0.16 vs 0.045 and 0.12 vs 0.042, respectively). During treatment, maximal DSDP was 0.52 in failed patients. CONCLUSION: The highest corticosteroid doses were insufficient to prevent failure in patients with pIOIS, particularly in those with a cellular pattern or orbital fat involvement. Large-scale interventional studies are now necessary to clarify prognostic factors and optimise corticosteroid management in patients with pIOIS.

[Abdominal obstruction revealing colonic lymphoma: a case report]. / Occlusion abdominale révélant un lymphome colique: à propos d'un cas.

Colonic lymphoma is a rare malignant gastrointestinal tumor that can be revealed by an exceptional and serious complication: intestinal obstruction. Treatment is based on surgery and chemotherapy. We here report a case of diffuse colonic large B-cell lymphoma revealed by occlusion and diagnosed based on the examination of surgical specimen in a 64-year-old man who was in complete remission after six courses of R-CHOP.

[The care pathway of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma described through Italian administrative healthcare data.] / Il percorso di cura dei pazienti con linfoma diffuso a grandi cellule B descritto attraverso i dati amministrativi.

INTRODUCTION: The diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (Dlbcl) is the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma and at highest incidence among the elderly. Despite the improved outcomes of patients treated with the first-line (1L) standard of care until the end of 2022, composed by rituximab and polychemotherapy (R-Chop), during the last 20 years, the rate of relapsed and refractory Dlbcl (rrDlbcl) remains elevated. This study has identified and analyzed patients newly diagnosed with Dlbcl and treated with 1L, from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (Ssn). METHODS: From the administrative database of Fondazione Ricerca e Salute (ReS) including ~5.5 million inhabitants/year in Italy, adults with a new in-hospital Dlbcl diagnosis (index date) and treated with 1L in 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021 were identified and characterized in terms of demographics and comorbidities during a period (from 4 to 8 years) preceding index date. From 1 to 4 years following index date (follow-up), overall survival (Kaplan-Meier curves), percentage distribution of patients by line of therapy including dispensation/administration of chemo-immunotherapy, hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (Hsct), and direct healthcare costs charge to the Ssn, were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, from the ReS database, 206 patients newly diagnosed with Dlbcl and treated with 1L from 2018 to 2021 in Italy (incidence from 0.9 to 1.7 x100,000 adult inhabitants) were identified. They were mainly older (median age 68 [56; 75] years), males (56%) and affected by ≥2 comorbidities (52%), mostly cardiometabolic. During 4 years of follow-up, 56% of cases in 2018 survived. During the first follow-up year: 73%, 80%, 100% and 35% of cases in 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively, received a 2L; 42% and 64% of cases in 2018 and 2020, respectively, received a 3L. At least one Hsct was found as a 2L among cases in 2018, 2020 and 2021. On average, each patient newly diagnosed with Dlbcl and treated with 1L from 2018 to 2021 caused a total expenditure directly charged to the Ssn ranging from € 20,000 to € 30,000 during the first follow-up year (chemo-immunotherapy accounted for 40-53%), which reduced with time in favor of other drugs and Hsct. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirms the high rate of rrDlbcl and the high economic impact charged to the SSN to support first the chemo-immunotherapy, then the chronic care and the absence of standardized further lines of therapy for patients with rrDlbcl.

Clinical trial: Chidamide plus CHOP improve the survival of newly diagnosed angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma.

Background: Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is known for its unfavorable survival prognosis. Chidamide has shown efficacy in relapsed/refractory AITL, but its efficacy in newly diagnosed AITL is uncertain. Objective: This retrospective research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of chidamide when used with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, prednisone, and vincristine (CHOP) in comparison to CHOP by itself for individuals newly diagnosed with AITL, and to examine the impact of transplantation. Method: This was an analysis that compared outcomes among patients who received chidamide + CHOP on a clinical trial vs. historical controls who received CHOP alone, enrolling a total of sixty-six treatment-naive AITL patients between April 2014 and November 2022. Among them, thirty-three received chidamide in addition to CHOP (chidamide group), while thirty-three received CHOP alone (control group). The clinical characteristics were balanced between the two groups. All patients were scheduled to undergo up to six courses of treatment before transplantation. Results: The chidamide group had a significantly longer median overall survival (OS) compared to the control group, with a median OS that was not reached, as opposed to 20 months in the control group (p = 0.002). In the control group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11 months, while in the chidamide group, it was 22 months (p = 0.080). In the high-risk group (IPI ≥ 3), the chidamide group demonstrated notably superior complete response (CR) and overall response rate (ORR) compared to the control cohort (p = 0.002, p = 0.034). The PFS and OS in the chidamide group were not reached, and there were significant differences compared to the control group (p = 0.007, p = 0.003). The median OS of the transplanted group was longer than the non-transplanted group (p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, chidamide group reduced the hazards of death in the total cohort. Conclusion: As the study was non-random and retrospective, Chidamide combined with chemotherapy should be tested in randomized trials given its potential to improve prognosis in treatment-naive AITL patients. Furthermore, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) has demonstrated enhanced overall survival in individuals with AITL. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT03268889.

Comparative effectiveness of 6x R-CHOP21 versus 6x R-CHOP21 + 2 R for patients with advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

First-line treatment for advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) typically involves 6x R-CHOP21 or 6x R-CHOP21 with two additional rituximab administrations (6x R-CHOP21 + 2 R). In contemporary practice, this treatment choice might be guided by interim PET scan results. This nationwide, population-based study investigates the comparative effectiveness of these treatment regimens in an era where interim PET-guided treatment decisions were not standard practice. Utilizing the Netherlands Cancer Registry, we identified 1577 adult patients diagnosed with advanced-stage DLBCL between 2014-2018 who completed either 6x R-CHOP21 (43%) or 6x R-CHOP21 + 2 R (57%). We used propensity scores to assess differences in event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). At five years, EFS (hazard ratio of 6x R-CHOP21 + 2 R versus 6x R-CHOP21 [HR] = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.09) and OS (HR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73-1.18) were not significantly different between both regimens. In exploratory risk-stratified analysis according to the International Prognostic Index (IPI), high-IPI patients (i.e., scores of 4-5) benefit most from 6x R-CHOP21 + 2 R (5-year absolute risk difference of EFS = 16.8%; 95% CI, -0.4%-34.1% and OS = 12.1%; 95% CI, -5.4-29.6%). Collectively, this analysis reveals no significant differences on average in EFS and OS between the two treatments. However, the potential benefits for high-risk patients treated with 6x R-CHOP21 + 2 R underscore the need for future research.

The global immune-nutrition-inflammation index (GINI) as a robust prognostic factor in glioblastoma patients treated with the standard stupp protocol.

BACKGROUND: Systemic inflammation can significantly impact gliomas' onset, progression, and prognosis. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) represents the glioma subtype characterized by the most profound inflammatory and immunosuppressive states. Consequently, various blood-borne biomarkers have been scrutinized concerning their prognostic value in GBM patients. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate whether the recently introduced Global Immune-Nutrition-Inflammation Index (GINI) holds prognostic significance for GBM patients treated with the standard Stupp protocol. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data from a cohort of newly diagnosed GBM patients receiving the standard Stupp regimen using the propensity score-matching methodology. The GINI was computed using the original formula: GINI = [(C-reactive protein × Monocytes × Platelets × Neutrophils) ÷ (Albumin × Lymphocytes)]. We employed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to identify the optimal cutoff values for GINI, which could help distinguish between different survival outcomes. The primary and secondary objectives were the differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the GINI groups. RESULTS: The optimal GINI cutoff value was 1350. Out of 294 eligible patients, 211 were PSM-matched: GINI<1350 (N = 95) and GINI≥1350 (N = 116). Comparative Kaplan-Meier estimates indicated that the GINI≥1350 patients had substantially worse median PFS (8.0 vs 16.8 months; p < .001) and OS (14.3 vs 22.9 months; p < .001) durations than their GINI<1350 counterparts. CONCLUSION: High pretreatment GINI values are robustly and independently associated with inferior PFS and OS outcomes in selected GBM patients who receive standard Stupp protocol. These findings suggest that if further confirmed, the novel GINI could serve as a valuable biological marker for the prognostic stratification of GBM patients.

A prospective evaluation of succinct prednisone tapering after brain tumor irradiation in dogs.

BACKGROUND: To ameliorate anticipated or ongoing neurological deficits, dogs undergoing brain tumor irradiation often are prescribed lengthy courses of prednisone PO during and after radiotherapy (RT). This practice can contribute to unwanted corticosteroid-associated morbidity and may be unnecessary. OBJECTIVE: Determine whether long-term corticosteroid dependency can be minimized by use of succinct prednisone tapering. ANIMALS: Fifty-five pet dogs undergoing brain tumor irradiation. METHODS: Nineteen dogs were treated using a "rapid-taper" protocol wherein corticosteroid dose reduction began 0 to 20 days after completing RT. Outcomes were compared with a retrospectively studied control group ("slow-taper"; N = 36 dogs) in which corticosteroids were tapered more slowly according to individual clinician recommendations. RESULTS: Patient demographics were similar between groups. Mean time to lowest prednisone dose was 41 days postirradiation in the rapid-taper group and 117 days in the slow-taper group (P = .003). In the rapid-taper group, 15 of 19 dogs (84%) were completely tapered off prednisone, vs 18 of 36 (50%) in the slow-taper group (P = .04). Rates at which corticosteroids had to be reinstituted later were similar for the 2 groups (approximately 1 in 3 dogs). Adverse effect rates were similar for the 2 groups. Although no comparable questionnaire-derived data were available for the "slow-taper" group, overall and neurologic quality of life remained stable after RT in the rapid-taper group. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: For many dogs, lengthy courses of PO prednisone are avoidable after intracranial RT. Future efforts should aim to identify which dogs benefit most from accelerated prednisone tapering.

Efficacy and safety of standard BEACOPP regimen versus ABVD regimen for treatment of advanced Hodgkin's lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: The current treatment regimens for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) are associated with high incidences of adverse events. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of doxorubicin + bleomycin + vincristine + dacarbazine (ABVD) and standard bleomycin + etoposide + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide + vincristine + procarbazine + prednisone (BEACOPP) chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced stage HL. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, parallel, open, positive control noninferiority trial was conducted from 2016 to 2019 and comprised 93 subjects who were randomized in a 1:1 ratio between the treatment (BEACOPP; n = 44) and control (ABVD; n = 49) groups. RESULTS: The primary efficacy endpoint of this trial was the objective response rate (ORR) after eight cycles of chemotherapy, which was 100.00% (36/36) in the treatment group and 95.74% (45/49) in the control group. The incidence of adverse reactions was 100% in both groups. Significant differences (P < 0.05) in the incidences of grade 3 (39/44 [88.64%] vs. 23/49 [46.94%]) and grade 4 (27/44 [61.36%] vs. 8/49 [16.94%]) adverse events were observed between the treatment and control groups, respectively. However, most of these reactions were manageable, with no serious consequences, and were reversible after discontinuation of the treatment. CONCLUSION: Both regimens had a similar ORR and were associated with a high number of adverse events. The ABVD regimen was better tolerated and safer than the standard BEACOPP regimen. This study indicates that the standard BEACOPP regimen may be considered as a treatment option for patients with advanced HL.

Blinatumomab after R-CHOP bridging therapy for patients with Richter transformation: a phase 2 multicentre trial.

Richter transformation (RT) is an aggressive lymphoma occurring in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Here we investigated the anti-CD3/anti-CD19 T-cell-engager blinatumomab after R-CHOP (i.e. rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) in patients with untreated RT of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma histology (NCT03931642). In this multicentre phase 2 study, patients without complete response (CR) after two cycles of R-CHOP were eligible to receive an 8-week blinatumomab induction via continuous vein infusion with stepwise dosing until 112 µg/day. The primary endpoint was the CR rate after blinatumomab induction and secondary endpoint included safety, response duration, progression-free and overall survival. Thirty-nine patients started the first cycle of R-CHOP, 25 of whom received blinatumomab. After blinatumomab induction, five (20%) patients achieved CR, four (16%) achieved partial response, and six (24%) were stable. Considering the entire strategy, the overall response rate in the full-analysis-set was 46% (n = 18), with CR in 14 (36%) patients. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of all grades in the blinatumomab-safety-set included fever (36%), anaemia (24%), and lymphopaenia (24%). Cytokine release syndrome (grade 1/2) was observed in 16% and neurotoxicity in 20% of patients. Blinatumomab demonstrated encouraging anti-tumour activity (the trial met its primary endpoint) and acceptable toxicity in patients with RT.

Delphi consensus recommendations on treatment for advanced-stage marginal zone lymphoma in South Korea.

Due to the lack of treatment guidelines for the management of advanced-stage marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), only one chemoimmunotherapy-cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone plus rituximab (R-CVP)-is reimbursed in the first-line setting in South Korea. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based recommendation for the treatment of patients with advanced-stage MZL. Twelve hematologist oncologists participated in a two-round Delphi process to identify consensus on the management of patients with advanced-stage MZL in South Korea. Physicians rated their level of agreement with each statement on a four-point Likert scale. Statements were divided into two sections: definitions used in clinical practice and clinical management of patients with advanced-stage MZL. Consensus was reached for 23 of 33 (69.7%) and 5 of 13 statements (38.5%) in rounds 1 and 2, respectively. There was strong consensus (91.7%) that advanced-stage MZL subtypes are defined according to the Lugano staging system. First-line systemic treatment should be prescribed for patients with symptomatic advanced-stage MZL. Although there was unanimous agreement that R-CVP is the standard first-line treatment for advanced-stage MZL, physicians also agreed that bendamustine with rituximab (BR) has greater efficacy than R-CVP as first-line treatment (91.7%). For the treatment of relapsed/refractory advanced-stage MZL, BR and R-CVP can be repeated in patients with short (< 24 months) and long remission periods (≥ 24 months), respectively. This study provides insights on the management of patients with advanced-stage MZL in South Korea. This may enhance clinical decision-making, thus improving patient outcomes.

Adjustment for imbalances in baseline characteristics in the MAGNITUDE phase 3 study confirms the clinical benefit of niraparib in combination with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: MAGNITUDE (NCT03748641) demonstrated favourable outcomes with niraparib plus abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (+AAP) versus placebo+AAP in patients with BRCA1/2-altered metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Imbalances in prognostic variables were reported between arms, which impacts estimation of both the clinical benefit and cost­effectiveness of niraparib+AAP for healthcare systems. A pre-specified multivariable analysis (MVA) demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) with niraparib+AAP. Here, we used an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) model to adjust for covariate imbalances and assess time-to-event outcomes. METHODS: IPTW analysis of time-to-event outcomes was conducted using data from patients with BRCA1/2-altered mCRPC (N = 225) in MAGNITUDE. Patients received niraparib+AAP or placebo+AAP. OS, radiographic progression-free survival, time to symptomatic progression, time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy and time to prostate-specific antigen progression were assessed. Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for each endpoint, and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were obtained from a weighted Cox model. RESULTS: Improvements in survival outcomes were estimated for niraparib+AAP versus placebo+AAP: unadjusted median OS was 30.4 months versus 28.6 months, respectively (HR: 0.79; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.55, 1.12; p = 0.183). Following IPTW, median OS increased to 34.1 months with niraparib+AAP versus a decrease to 27.4 with placebo (HR: 0.65; 95 % CI: 0.46, 0.93; p = 0.017). Similar improvements were observed for other time-to-event endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: IPTW adjustment provided a more precise estimate of the clinical benefit of niraparib+AAP versus placebo+AAP in patients with BRCA1/2-altered mCRPC. Results were consistent with the pre-specified MVA, and further demonstrated the value of adjusting for baseline imbalances, particularly in smaller studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03748641 (MAGNITUDE).

Outcomes of First-Line Abiraterone Acetate or Enzalutamide for Older Adults With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer According to Use of Upfront Docetaxel for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in an International Multicenter Registry: A SPARTACUSS-Meet-URO 26 Study.

BACKGROUND: Managing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in men aged ≥ 75 is challenging due to limited data. Regardless of age, in real-world clinical practice, most mCRPC still derive from failure of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel (D) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). As abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AA) and enzalutamide (Enza) are common first-line treatments for mCRPC. The impact of prior use of D for mCSPC on the efficacy and safety of AA or Enza in this older population remains unclear. METHODS: A cohort of patients aged ≥ 75 years starting AA or Enza as first-line therapy for mCRPC from January 2015 to April 2019 was identified from the registries of 10 institutions. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on previous use of D for mCSPC. Primary endpoints were cancer-specific survival (CSS) from AA or Enza start, CSS from ADT onset, and safety. We used Kaplan-Meier method to estimate the endpoints distribution, including median values with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Of the 337 patients identified, 24 (7.1%) received ADT+D and 313 (92.9%) received ADT alone for mCSPC. Median follow-up from AA/Enza start was 18.8 months. Median CSS from ADT or AA/Enza was not significantly different between ADT+D and ADT alone cohorts (71.9 vs. 52.7 months, P = .97; 25.4 vs. 27.2 months, P = .89, respectively). No statistically significant difference in adverse events (AEs) of any grade rate (58.3% vs. 52.1%, respectively; P = .67) or grade ≥ 3 (12.5% vs. 15.7%, respectively; P = 1.0) was found between ADT+D and ADT alone cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the innate limitations of a retrospective design and relatively small size of the ADT+D cohort, this analysis suggests that elderly men receiving AA or Enza as first-line therapy for mCRPC have similar survival outcomes and tolerability, regardless of previous D for mCSPC.

Early progression during or after cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy indicates poor outcome with rescue protocols in dogs with multicentric lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Dogs with lymphoma that fail cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone chemotherapy (CHOP) before completion of their protocol are commonly thought to have poor long-term outcome, but no previous studies have evaluated the effect of early relapse on progression-free interval (PFI) or overall survival time (OST) for patients undergoing rescue chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: Correlate rescue treatment outcomes in dogs with multicentric lymphoma with outcomes after 1st-line CHOP chemotherapy. METHODS: Data were collected from 6 previous retrospective or prospective studies in 187 dogs with multicentric lymphoma that received 1st-line CHOP chemotherapy and then received either lomustine (CCNU), L-asparaginase and prednisone (LAP), or rabacfosadine (RAB, Tanovea), with or without prednisone or L-asparaginase. RESULTS: The PFI after initiation of CHOP chemotherapy was significantly associated with response rate postprogression, PFI, and postrescue survival time (ST) for both rescue protocols. Immunophenotype (B- vs T-cell) was not significantly associated with response, PFI or OST for LAP but was significantly associated with response and PFI for RAB. CONCLUSION: Dogs that experience short PFI during or after 1st-line CHOP chemotherapy had lower response rates to rescue treatment, with shorter PFI and ST. Immunophenotype did not significantly affect outcome with LAP but was associated with PFI for RAB.

Metformin in Combination with Standard Therapy in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Metformin has been shown to have antitumor activity in different tumor types. In DLBCL (Diffuse large B cell lymphoma), using metformin with front-line chemotherapy & immunotherapy resulted in improved clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of incorporating metformin into the standard initial treatment regimen of R-CHOP for patients with DLBCL. The evaluation metrics included response rate, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective phase 2 trial included 100 adult patients with histopathological evidence of DLBCL, eligible for first-line treatment with R-CHOP, life expectancy of at least 6 months, and performance status (PS) ≤ 2. Patients were randomized to receive either metformin plus R-CHOP or R-CHOP alone. RESULTS: Each group included 50 patients. The metformin arm had more females than the standard arm (p=0.016). Nausea was significantly higher in the test arm than the standard arm (p=0.008). Metformin group had higher rates of complete remission (CR) at the end of treatment (92% vs 74%; p=0.017), lower rates of relapse/progression (10% vs 36%; p=0.002), and lower rates of overall mortality (4% vs 20%; p=0.014). The mean disease-free survival (DFS) was 24.5 months in the metformin group versus 20.2 months in the control arm (p=0.023). Likewise, the mean progression-free survival (PFS) was 25.91 versus 19.81 months and the mean overall survival (OS) was 27.39 versus 23.8 months (p-values= 0.002, and 0.013 respectively). By multivariate analysis of response and relapse, the use of metformin was an independent prognostic factor of CR and relapse. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of metformin to standard R-CHOP could improve clinical outcomes in patients with DLBCL with a tolerable safety profile.

Intermittent pulses of methylprednisolone with low-dose prednisone attenuate lupus symptoms in B6.MRL-Faslpr/J mice with fewer glucocorticoid side effects.

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressant medications and remain the cornerstone of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) therapy. However, ongoing exposure to GCs has the potential to elicit multiple adverse effects. Considering the irreplaceability of GCs in SLE therapy, it is important to explore the optimal regimen of GCs. Here, we compared the long-term efficacy and safety of pulsed and oral GC therapy in a lupus-prone mouse model. Mice were grouped using a randomized block design. We monitored survival rates, proteinuria, serum autoantibodies, and complement 3 (C3) levels up to 28 weeks of age, and assessed renal damage, bone quality, lipid deposition in the liver and marrow, glucose metabolic parameters, and levels of hormones of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Finally, we explored the mechanisms underlying the superior efficacy of the pulse regimen over oral prednisone regimen. We found that both GC regimens alleviated the poor survival rate, proteinuria, and glomerulonephritis, while also reducing serum autoantibodies and increasing the level of C3. The pulsed GC regimen showed less resistance to insulin, less suppression of the HPA axis, less bone loss, and less bone marrow fat deposition than the oral GC regimen. Additionally, GC-induced leucine zipper (GILZ) was significantly overexpressed in the GC pulse group. These results suggest that the GC pulse regimen ameliorated symptoms in lupus-prone mice, with fewer side effects, which may be related to GILZ overexpression. Our findings offer a potentially promising GC treatment option for SLE.

Metabolic tumour area: a novel prognostic indicator based on 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the R-CHOP era.

BACKGROUND: The metabolic tumour area (MTA) was found to be a promising predictor of prostate cancer. However, the role of MTA based on 18F-FDG PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) prognosis remains unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the prognostic significance of MTA and evaluate its incremental value to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI) for DLBCL patients treated with first-line R-CHOP regimens. METHODS: A total of 280 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL and baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT data were retrospectively evaluated. Lesions were delineated via a semiautomated segmentation method based on a 41% SUVmax threshold to estimate semiquantitative metabolic parameters such as total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV) and MTA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off values. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the endpoints that were used to evaluate the prognosis. PFS and OS were estimated via Kaplan‒Meier curves and compared via the log-rank test. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed that patients with high MTA, high TMTV and NCCN-IPI ≥ 4 were associated with inferior PFS and OS (P < 0.0001 for all). Multivariate analysis indicated that MTA remained an independent predictor of PFS and OS [hazard ratio (HR), 2.506; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.337-4.696; P = 0.004; and HR, 1.823; 95% CI, 1.005-3.310; P = 0.048], whereas TMTV was not. Further analysis using the NCCN-IPI model as a covariate revealed that MTA and NCCN-IPI were still independent predictors of PFS (HR, 2.617; 95% CI, 1.494-4.586; P = 0.001; and HR, 2.633; 95% CI, 1.650-4.203; P < 0.0001) and OS (HR, 2.021; 95% CI, 1.201-3.401; P = 0.008; and HR, 3.869; 95% CI, 1.959-7.640; P < 0.0001; respectively). Furthermore, MTA was used to separate patients with high NCCN-IPI risk scores into two groups with significantly different outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-treatment MTA based on 18F-FDG PET/CT and NCCN-IPI were independent predictor of PFS and OS in DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP. MTA has additional predictive value for the prognosis of patients with DLBCL, especially in high-risk patients with NCCN-IPI ≥ 4. In addition, the combination of MTA and NCCN-IPI may be helpful in further improving risk stratification and guiding individualised treatment options. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This research was retrospectively registered with the Ethics Committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, and the registration number was approval No. 155 (approved date: 31 May 2022).

Optimization and characterization of Rituximab targeted multidrug loaded cyclodextrin nanoparticles against Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Currently, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) constitutes 85-90 % of all lymphomas. Clinical treatment of NHL is based on the "4-drug regimen" known as CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone). Rituximab (RTX) is added to increase the effectiveness and selectivity of the treatment and is the first-line standard treatment for NHL patients. However, success is often prevented by the development of drug resistance. In this study, it was aimed to overcome drug resistance by using two novel tumor-targeted derivatives: guanidine-amphiphilic cyclodextrin (ACD) and guanidine-cyclodextrin polymer (PCD) nanoparticles (NP). These constructs display promise in overcoming drug resistance and enhancing the effectiveness of R-CHOP treatment while potentially eliminating the need for corticosteroid. NP were found to be smaller than 200 nm by dynamic light scattering (DLS). Hemolytic activity and cytotoxicity data on L929 cells demonstrated the safety of the newly synthesized CD derivatives. Additional in vitro characterization studies, including surface charge, physical stability, drug loading capacity, drug release profile, and imaging, as well as conventional and 3D cell culture studies were carried out. Compared to drug solutions, the viability of Daudi human lymphoma cells was statistically significantly decreased in both drug-loaded ACD and PCD NP formulations (p < 0.05). Additionally, RTX-conjugated and drug-loaded ACD NPs exhibited the lowest cell viability due to RTX dependent cytotoxicity.

Real life clinical outcomes of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: The STRIDER study.

BACKGROUND: Relapse and refractory (R/R) rates after first-line R-CHOP in diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCL) are ~40% and ~15% respectively. AIMS: We conducted a retrospective real-world analysis aimed at evaluating clinical outcomes of R/R DLBCL patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Overall, 403 consecutive DLBCL patients treated in two large hematological centers in Torino, Italy were reviewed. RESULTS: At a median follow up of 50 months, 5-year overall survival from diagnosis (OS-1) was 66.5%, and 2-year progression free survival (PFS-1) was 68%. 134 (34.4%) patients relapsed (n = 46, 11.8%) or were refractory (n = 88, 22.6%) to R-CHOP. Most employed salvage treatments included platinum salt-based regimens in 38/134 (28.4%), lenalidomide in 14 (10.4%). Median OS and PFS after disease relapse or progression (OS-2 and PFS-2) were 6.7 and 5.1 months respectively. No significant difference in overall response rate, OS-2 or PFS-2 in patients treated with platinum-based regimens versus other regimens was observed. By multivariate analysis, age between 60 and 80 years, germinal center B cell type cell of origin and extranodal involvement of <2 sites were associated with better OS-2. DISCUSSION: Our findings confirm very poor outcomes of R/R DLBCL in the rituximab era. Widespread approval by national Medicine Agencies of novel treatments such as CAR-T cells and bispecific antibodies as second-line is eagerly awaited to improve these outcomes.

Brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and prednisone followed by brentuximab vedotin consolidation in CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: CD30 expression is universal in anaplastic large-cell lymphoma and is expressed in some other peripheral T-cell lymphoma subtypes. Incorporation of brentuximab vedotin into initial therapy for people with CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas prolonged progression-free survival, but there is room for improvement, especially for people with non-anaplastic large-cell lymphoma subtypes. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, international, single-arm, phase 2 trial to evaluate the safety and activity of CHEP-BV (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone, brentuximab vedotin, and etoposide) followed by brentuximab vedotin consolidation in patients with CD30-expressing peripheral T-cell lymphomas across five academic centres in the USA and Canada. Adults aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed, untreated CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0-2, and adequate organ function were eligible to receive six planned cycles of CHEP-BV (ie, 1·8 mg/kg brentuximab vedotin intravenously on day 1, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, etoposide 100 mg/m2 daily intravenously on days 1-3, and prednisone 100 mg daily orally on days 1-5) with prophylactic G-CSF. Patients who responded to the treatment could receive brentuximab vedotin consolidation for up to ten additional cycles either after autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) or directly after CHEP-BV. The primary endpoints were unacceptable toxicity during a 3-plus-3 safety lead-in in participants who received study treatment and completed the safety evaluation period (to confirm the recommended phase 2 dose of brentuximab vedotin in CHEP-BV) and the complete response rate after CHEP-BV induction therapy in participants who received study treatment and had response evaluation. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03113500), and this cohort completed the trial. The trial is ongoing with the enrolment of a new cohort. FINDINGS: 54 patients were screened for eligibility and 48 were eligible for the study. The participants (18 [38%] women and 30 [63%] men; 34 [71%] White, four [8%] Black, five [10%] Asian, ten [21%] Hispanic, and 37 [77%] non-Hispanic people) were recruited and enrolled between Dec 4, 2017, and June 14, 2021, and followed up until Aug 25, 2023, when the database was locked for analysis. 48 participants were evaluable for toxicity, and 47 were evaluable for response (one participant died from COVID-19 before response assessment). During the safety lead-in, one of six participants had an unacceptable toxicity (ie, platelet count <10 000 per mm3 in a participant with extensive bone marrow involvement), and the proposed phase 2 dose of 1·8 mg/kg brentuximab vedotin in CHEP-BV was confirmed. At completion of CHEP-BV, 37 of 47 participants had complete response, yielding a complete response rate of 79% (95% CI 64-89). The most common CHEP-BV-related toxicities of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (14 [29%] of 48), leukopenia (11 [23%]), anaemia (ten [21%]), febrile neutropenia (ten [21%]), lymphopenia (nine [19%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [19%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: In patients with mostly CD30-expressing peripheral T-cell lymphomas other than non-anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, CHEP-BV (with or without autologous HSCT) followed by brentuximab vedotin consolidation was safe and active. FUNDING: SeaGen, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Lymphoma Research Foundation, and the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health.