Vaginal natural orifice transvaginal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for benign ovarian cysts is safe and feasible in same-day discharge: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Advances in minimally invasive surgery and the development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) have favored the spread of day-surgery programs. Even though Vaginal natural orifice transvaginal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is accepted as an innovative treatment for benign ovarian cysts that is rapidly gaining recognition worldwide, the safety and feasibility of same-day surgery (SDS) have yet to be established. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of day surgery compared to inpatient surgery of patients undergoing vNOTES for benign ovarian cysts by determining perioperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study consisted of 213 patients who underwent vNOTES for ovarian cystectomy at a single institution from January 2020 to November 2022. Based on the hospital stay, patients were classified into the same-day surgery group (SDSG) and the inpatient surgery group (ISG); after data processing and screening considering the balance of the two groups, SDSG has 83 samples(n = 83), and ISG has 113 samples(n = 113). The patient's demographic characteristics and follow-up data were collected during the perioperative period by doctors and nurses for medical tracking and analysis purposes and 1-month postoperatively by doctors in charge of their operation. Independent sample t-tests were performed to verify if there was any major difference between these two groups for continuous data like age, BMI, and cyst diameter, and Pearson's chi-squared tests were used to test whether there was a major difference between these two groups for categorical data like cyst count, abdominal surgery history and whether their cyst is bilateral ovarian cysts or not. The association between exhaust time and postoperative characteristics and the association between levels of pain and postoperative characteristics were further analyzed to unveil the confounding factors contributing to the same-day discharge method's quick recovery nature. RESULTS: Upon performing propensity score matching, 196 patients were finally enrolled in this study for the matched comparison, including 83(42.3%) patients in the SDSG and 113(57.7%) patients in the ISG. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of duration of operation (85.0 ± 41.5 min vs. 80.5 ± 33.5 min), estimated blood loss (27.7 ± 28.0 ml vs. 36.3 ± 33.2 ml), preoperative hemoglobin levels (128.8 ± 13.2 g/L vs. 128.6 ± 14.0 g/L), postoperative hemoglobin difference at 24 h (16.5 ± 15.4 g/L vs. 19.3 ± 9.1 g/L), pelvic adhesions (42 (50.6%) vs. 47 (41.6%)), and postoperative complications (7(8.4%) vs. 4(3.5%)). The SDSG group showed less time of feeding/off-bed/exhaust/urination after surgery, shorter hospitalization duration, a lower postoperative 6-hour pain score, and a lower incidence of analgesic drug use. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that advancing the time of postoperative off-bed activity and feeding reduced the postoperative exhaust time by 0.34 (95% CI: 0.185-0.496, 0.34 h, p < 0.001) and 0.299(95% CI: 0.158-0.443, 0.229 h, p = 0.036) hours. In addition, Ordinal logistic regression revealed a correlation between pain scores and bilaterality of cyst, increasing about 25.98 times the risk of pain levels when ovarian cysts are bilateral (OR: 26.98, 95% CI: 1.071-679.859, P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, same-day discharge after vaginal natural orifice transvaginal endoscopic ovarian cystectomy is safe and feasible. The vNOTES for ovarian cystectomy combined with the same-day discharge shorten the exhaust time and duration of hospitalization, reduce postoperative pain, and lower the use incidence of analgesic drugs.

SAME day amBulatory c (SAMBA): a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: A recent meta-analysis concluded that outpatient appendectomy appears feasible and safe, but there is a lack of high-quality evidence and a randomized trial is needed. The aim of this trial is to demonstrate that outpatient appendectomy is non-inferior to conventional inpatient appendectomy in terms of overall morbi-mortality on the 30th postoperative day (D30). METHODS: SAMBA is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter non-inferiority trial. We will include 1400 patients admitted to 15 French hospitals between January 2023 and June 2025. Inclusion criteria are patients aged between 15 and 74 years presenting acute uncomplicated appendicitis suitable to be operated by laparoscopy. Patients will be randomized to receive outpatient care (day-surgery) or conventional inpatient care with overnight hospitalization in the surgery department. The primary outcome is postoperative morbi-mortality at D30. Secondary outcomes include time from diagnosis to appendectomy, length of total hospital stay, re-hospitalization, interventional radiology, re-interventions until D30, conversion from outpatient to inpatient, and quality of life and patient satisfaction using validated questionnaires. DISCUSSION: The SAMBA trial tests the hypothesis that outpatient surgery (i.e., without an overnight hospital stay) of uncomplicated acute appendicitis is a feasible and reliable procedure in establishments with a technical platform able to support this management strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05691348. Registered on 20 January 2023.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, approximately 90% of elective anesthetics have been ambulatory: A retrospective analysis of statewide data in Florida from 2010 through 2022.

BACKGROUND: When the vast majority (e.g., ≈90%) of a specialty's elective (scheduled) care is ambulatory (i.e., length of stay 0 or 1 night), the administrative, clinical, and economic policy implications are profound. We examined the progressive shift of elective anesthetics in Florida from inpatient to ambulatory, from the first quarter of 2010 through the fourth quarter of 2022. We were particularly interested in the most recent data following the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions on elective surgery in the state. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included major therapeutic and major diagnostic procedures with >0 American Society of Anesthesiologists base units in the state of Florida inpatient and ambulatory surgery databases. The last 8 quarters of these operating room anesthetic data corresponded to the end of restrictions on elective surgery in Florida due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our goal was to determine whether the overall mean percentage of cases with 0- or 1-day lengths of stay has reached 90% since the lifting of pandemic restrictions. Numbers of cases over periods of at least four weeks tend to follow normal distributions. Therefore, we analyzed the N = 8 quarters of cases from 2021 to 2022 using Student's t-test. The study was performed when there were N = 8 quarters available from the Florida healthcare databases. RESULTS: There were overall 22,584,752 surgical cases studied. The percentages of elective anesthetics with length of stay ≤1-day increased progressively from 2010 through 2020. Among the eight successive quarters since the end of pandemic-related elective surgery restrictions, the percentage of elective cases with length of stay 0- or 1 day was stable, averaging 90% (95% two-sided confidence interval 89.4% to 90.3%). CONCLUSION: Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the mean quarterly percentage of elective surgery cases with anesthesia in Florida that were ambulatory has been reliably ≈90%. Implications include value in expecting overnight post-anesthesia care unit stay in ambulatory surgery centers and scheduling and sequencing cases based on post-anesthesia care unit capacity. Furthermore, because the vast majority (i.e., ≈90%) of cases would be excluded (i.e., not involve hospital admission for at least 2 midnights), there is a minimal role that risk-adjusted hospital length of stay and mortality can have in evaluating anesthesia department overall quality and economic effectiveness.

Comparing the Sedative Effects of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine, Midazolam, and Ketamine in Outpatient Pediatric Surgeries: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: The management of preoperative anxiety in pediatric patients, as well as its implications, has remained challenging for anesthesiologists. In this study, we compared the safety and efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine, midazolam, and ketamine as surgical premedication in children. Methods: This double-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted at two tertiary hospitals in January 2014, on 90 children aged between 2-7 years old. The participants' American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status was I or II, and they were scheduled for elective unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. Using the block randomization method, the patients were randomly assigned to three groups, each receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine (2 µg/Kg), midazolam (0.2 mg/Kg), and ketamine (8 mg/Kg) 60 min before induction of anesthesia. Anxiety and sedation state were evaluated before drug administration, and then every 10 min for the next 50 min. Parental separation anxiety, mask acceptance, postoperative agitation, pain, nausea, and vomiting were also recorded and compared between these groups. All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 21.0). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Ketamine indicated the strongest sedative effect 10, 20, and 30 min after administration of premedication (P<0.001, P=0.03, P=0.01, respectively). However, dexmedetomidine was more effective than other drugs after 40 and 50 min (P<0.001). Other variables indicated no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: In case of emergencies, intranasal ketamine, with the shortest time of action, could be administered. Intranasal dexmedetomidine, which was revealed to be the most potent drug in this study, could be administrated 40-50 min before elective pediatric surgeries.Trial registration number: IRCT2013081614372N1.

Outpatient vs. inpatient designation in total hip arthroplasty: can we predict who will require hospitalization?

INTRODUCTION: Following removal of total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the inpatient only (IPO) list by the Center for Medicare Services (CMS), arthroplasty surgeons face increased pressure to perform procedures on an outpatient (OP) basis. The purposes of the present study were to compare patients booked for THA as OP who required conversion to IP status postoperatively, to patients who were booked as, and remained OP, and to identify factors predictive of conversion from OP to IP status. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent a primary THA at our institution between January 1, 2020 and April 26, 2022. All patients included were originally scheduled for OP surgery and were separated based on conversion to IP status postoperatively. Multiple regression analyses were used to determine the significance of all perioperative variables. Modeling via binary logistic regressions were used to determine factors predictive of status conversion. RESULTS: Of 1,937 patients, 372 (19.2%) designated as OP preoperatively required conversion to IP status postoperatively. These patients had significantly higher facility discharge rates (P < 0.001) and 90-day readmission rates (P = 0.024). Patients aged 65 and older (P < 0.001), females (P < 0.001), patients with Black/African American race (P = 0.027), with a recovery room arrival time after 12 pm (P < 0.001), with a BMI > 30 kg/m2 (P = 0.001), and with a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 4 (P = 0.013) were Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation more likely to require conversion to IP designation. Marital status and time of procedure were also significant factors, as patients who were married (P < 0.001) and who were the first case of the day (P < 0.001) were less likely to be converted to IP. CONCLUSION: Several factors were identified which could help determine appropriate hospital designation status at the time of surgical booking to ultimately avoid insurance claim denials. These included BMI, certain demographic factors, CCI ≥ 4, and patients 65 or older. LEVEL III EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Few Anesthesia-Related Adverse Events in a Retrospective Cohort Study of Patients With Unanticipated Intensive Care Unit Admission After Ambulatory Procedures.

We evaluated whether a hospital-based anesthesia department can validly use automated intensive care unit (ICU) admission data after elective ambulatory procedures to assess the quality of anesthetic care. Among 13,656 patients, 25 (0.2%) had an unplanned hospital length of stay >1 night and ICU admission. On review, only 1 of the 25 cases (0.007%) had an anesthesia-related complication. The false-positive incidence of anesthetic complications was ≥96% for scheduled ambulatory cases with ICU admission. Therefore, fully automated computerized identification of all unexpected ICU admissions after ambulatory procedures without manual review is an unsuitable (invalid) metric of individual anesthesiologists' clinical performance.

Patient selection for arterial procedures in office-based laboratories: A systematic review.

A dramatic increase in the number of vascular procedures performed in the office-based laboratory setting has been observed since 2008, when the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services increased reimbursement for procedures performed in the ambulatory setting. We sought to evaluate the appropriateness of arterial intervention in the office-based laboratory and patient selection. This systematic review was conducted with a search of Google Scholar and PubMed using the following search terms: office-based lab, outpatient, angioplasty, patient selection, arterial, and appropriateness. More than 500 publications were screened and 14 publications related to the topic were selected. The existing literature that examined patient selection for intervention in the outpatient setting, rates of complications after outpatient procedures, and short-term data on the safety and efficacy of these procedures is discussed. Gaps were identified in current knowledge about the long-term outcomes of peripheral arterial interventions performed in the office-based laboratory setting, as well as existing guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Outpatient surgery for tibial plateau fractures.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the rates of compartment syndrome and other early complications following outpatient open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of tibial plateau fractures. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort at a single US level I academic trauma centre of patients with tibial plateau fractures managed operatively. Inpatients received their definitive ORIF during their index hospital stay and were admitted post-operatively following ORIF. Outpatients were scheduled for ambulatory surgery during definitive ORIF. Exclusion criteria for outpatient surgery included compartment syndrome, polytrauma, open types IIIb/IIIc, and patients who received any internal fixation during index presentation. The primary outcome measure was post-operative compartment syndrome. Secondary outcomes were return to the 90-day return to the ED, 90-day readmission, surgical wound infection, thromboembolism, and 90-day mortality. An intention-to-treat (ITT) and as-treated (AT) analyses were performed. RESULTS: Totally, 71 inpatients and 47 outpatients were included. There were no cases of post-operative compartment syndrome. In the ITT analysis, there were no differences for inpatients vs outpatients for 90-day re-admission (22.5% vs 12.8%, p = 0.275), 90-day return to the ED (35.2% vs 17.0%, p = 0.052), infection (12.7% vs 2.1%, p = 0.094), DVT (7% vs 4.3%, p = 0.819), or PE 1.4% vs 0.0%, p = 1.000). The AT analysis showed a significantly higher 90-day re-admission (26.9% vs 2.5%, p = 0.003) and 90-day ED visit (38.5% vs 7.5%, p = 0.001) rate in the inpatient group. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriately selected patients with isolated tibial plateau fractures can have non-inferior rates of compartment syndrome and post-operative complications when compared to inpatients.

Disparities in outpatient rural cholecystectomy outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed comparable outcomes for common in-patient general surgery operations, but it is unknown if this extends to outpatient operations. Our aim was to compare outpatient cholecystectomy outcomes between rural and urban hospitals. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was done using the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample for patients 20-years-and-older undergoing cholecystectomy between 2016 and 2018 â€‹at rural and urban hospitals. Survey-weighted multivariable regression analysis was performed with primary outcomes including use-of-laparoscopy, complications, and patient discharge disposition. RESULTS: The most common indication for operation was cholecystitis in both hospital settings. On multivariable analysis, rural hospitals were associated with higher transfers to short-term hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.40, 95%CI 1.61-3.58, p â€‹< â€‹0.01) and complications (aOR 1.39, 95%CI 1.11-1.75, p â€‹< â€‹0.01). No difference was detected with laparoscopy (aOR 1.93, 95%CI 0.73-5.13, p â€‹= â€‹0.19), routine discharge (aOR 1.50, 95%C I0.91-2.45, p â€‹= â€‹0.11), or mortality (aOR 3.23, 95%CI 0.10-100.0, p â€‹= â€‹0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Patients cared for at rural hospitals were more likely to be transferred to short-term hospitals and have higher complications. No differences were detected in laparoscopy, routine discharge or mortality.

Factors influencing the fasting decisions of day-case surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients admitted on the day of surgery are asked to arrive fasted, and they often fast for longer than necessary. Although pre-assessment supports patients to prepare for surgery, little is known about how they make fasting decisions. AIMS: To explore factors influencing the fasting decisions of day-case patients and how to provide information pre-operatively. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study design was used. Semi-structured telephone interviews were carried out with 10 patients recruited from a single day-case unit. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Three themes provided context for fasting decisions: the operation as a serious event; the patient as an active partner; and the patient as a rule follower. Length of fast is determined by fasting decisions and practicalities. CONCLUSION: Patients approach fasting decisions according to their knowledge and experience and their individual preferences for information. Pre-assessment nurses should tailor information to the patient and explain the rationale for fasting.

Business and Corporate Models for Interventional Radiology in the Office Based Lab and Ambulatory Surgical Center Setting.

The landscape of healthcare is shifting towards outpatient settings such as Office-Based Labs (OBLs) and Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs). This transition, driven by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), presents various business and corporate models for interventional radiologists seeking to practice outside traditional hospital environments. The role of private equity and management services in facilitating these transitions is highlighted, offering opportunities for growth, efficiency, and enhanced control over practice operations. The document also discusses the financial aspects of establishing an OBL or ASC, the benefits of outpatient procedures, and the adaptability of private equity deals to the specific needs of medical practices. It concludes by emphasizing the potential for long-term wealth creation and the adaptability of these models to individual physician needs.

Prepacked Take-Home Analgesia in Outpatient Hand Surgery Reduces Opioid Dispensation.

BACKGROUND: Adequate postoperative pain treatment is important for quality of life, patient satisfaction, rehabilitation, function, and total opioid consumption, and might lower both the risk of chronic postoperative pain and the costs for society. Prolonged opioid consumption is a well-known risk factor for addiction. Previous studies in upper extremity surgery have shown that total opioid consumption is a third of the amount prescribed, which can be explained by package size. The aim of this study was to examine whether implementation of prepacked takehome analgesia bags reduced the quantity of prescribed and dispensed opioids. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We introduced prepacked take-home analgesia bags for postoperative pain treatment in outpatient surgery. The bags came in two sizes, each containing paracetamol, etoricoxib, and oxycodone. The first 147 patients who received the prepacked analgesia bags were included in the study, and received a questionnaire one month after surgery covering self-assessed pain (visual analog scale of 0-10) and satisfaction (0-5), as well as opioid consumption. Prescription data after introducing the analgesia bags were compared with data before the bags were introduced. RESULTS: Of the 147 patients included in the study, 58 responded. Compared to standard prescription (small bag group: 14 oxycodone immediate release capsules (5 mg), large bag group: additional 28 oxycodone extended release tablets (5 mg), based on the smallest available package), the patients in the small analgesia bag group received 50% less oxycodone and 67% less for the large bag group. Patients with small bags consumed a median of 0.0 mg oxycodone and those with large bags consumed a median of 25.0 mg oxycodone. The median satisfaction was 5.0 (range: 2-5) and the median pain score was acceptable at the first postoperative day. Prescription data showed a significant reduction of 60.0% in the total amount of prescribed opioids after the introduction of prepacked analgesia bags. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of prepacked analgesia bags dramatically reduced the quantity of opioids prescribed after outpatient hand surgery. Patient satisfaction was high and the postoperative pain level was acceptable. KEY WORDS: analgesia, hand surgery, opioids, outpatint surgery, wrist surgery.

Construction of a Full-Process Nursing Service Platform for Day Surgery Patients Based on Kano Model.

This study was based on the Kano model and rely on the Internet hospital to build a day surgery patient full-process nursing service platform. Based on the Internet hospital's HIS system, nursing Yuanzhuo system, patient mobile terminal (WeChat) and other information systems. The platform was designed by following the WHO's conceptual framework for developing a scaling-up strategy. It was tested and refined by a pilot in a hospital in China. The full-process care platform for day surgery patients realizes information interconnection and interoperability of patient surgical consultation, surgical inquiries, and postoperative follow-up. It consists of a WeChat applet (client) and an online website (server). Pre-experiment results show that patients are more likely to recommend the hospital's day surgery to others. The mHealth-based perioperative full-process nursing service platform for day surgery patients can initially meet the health education needs, surgical consultation needs and follow-up needs of day surgery patients.

Fully ambulatory robotic single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI): 40 consecutive patients in a single tertiary bariatric center.

BACKGROUND: Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal bypass (SADI) is becoming a key option as a revision procedure after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). However, its safety as an ambulatory procedure (length of stay < 12 h) has not been widely described. METHODS: A prospective bariatric study of 40 patients undergoing SADI robotic surgery after LSG with same day discharge (SDD), was undertaken in April 2021. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and the enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocol was followed. Anesthesia and robotic procedures were standardized. Early follow-up (30 days) analyzed postoperative (PO) outcomes. RESULTS: Forty patients (37 F/3 M, mean age: 40.3yo), with a mean pre-operative BMI = 40.5 kg/m2 were operated. Median time after LSG was 54 months (21-146). Preoperative comorbidities included: hypertension (n = 3), obstructive sleep apnea (n = 2) and type 2 diabetes (n = 1). Mean total operative time was 128 min (100-180) (mean robotic time: 66 min (42-85)), including patient setup. All patients were discharged home at least 6 h after surgery. There were four minor complications (10%) and two major complications (5%) in the first 30 days postoperative (one intrabdominal abscess PO day-20 (radiological drainage and antibiotic therapy) and one peritonitis due to duodenal leak PO day-1 (treated surgically)). There were six emergency department visits (15%), readmission rate was 5% (n = 2) and reintervention rate was 2.5% (n = 1) There was no mortality and no unplanned overnight hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic SADI can be safe for SDD, with appropriate patient selection, in a high-volume center.

Safety and feasibility of early drinking water after general anesthesia recovery in patients undergoing daytime surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patients who are recovering from general anesthesia commonly exhibit symptoms such as dry lips, throat irritation, and thirst, prompting a desire to drink water in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects and any potential complications of administering varying quantities of water to such patients. The primary objectives are to assess the safety and feasibility of early water intake after general anesthesia, specifically in the context of daytime surgery. METHODS: A total of 200 nongastrointestinal patients who underwent outpatient surgery were randomly assigned to four groups: Group A (drinking < 1 ml/kg), Group B (drinking 1-2 ml/kg), Group C (drinking > 2 ml/kg), and Group D (no water intake). We monitored changes in the assessment parameters before and after water consumption, as well as the incidence of post-drinking nausea and vomiting, and compared these outcomes among the four groups. RESULTS: Water intake led to a significant reduction in thirst, oropharyngeal discomfort, and pain scores and a notable increase in the gastric antrum motility index (MI), exhibiting statistical significance compared to the values before drinking (p < 0.05). Remarkably, higher water consumption correlated with enhanced gastrointestinal peristalsis. There was a significant difference in the antral MI among groups B, C, and A (p < 0.05). The occurrence of nausea and vomiting did not significantly differ among groups A, B, C, and D (p > 0.05). Early water consumption enhanced patient satisfaction with medical care, significantly varying from Group D (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Non-gastrointestinal surgical patients who passed pre-drinking water assessments post GA(general anesthesia)recovery could safely ingest moderate amounts of water in the PACU. Early water intake is both safe and feasible, effectively fostering swift postoperative recovery.

Ambulatory Surgery Centers Reduce Patient Out-of-Pocket Expenditures for Isolated Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair, but Patient Out-of-Pocket Expenditures Are Increasing at a Faster Rate Than Total Healthcare Utilization Reimbursement From Payers.

PURPOSE: To categorize and trend annual out-of-pocket expenditures for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) patients relative to total healthcare utilization (THU) reimbursement and compare drivers of patient out-of-pocket expenditures (POPE) in a granular fashion via analyses by insurance type and surgical setting. METHODS: Patients who underwent outpatient arthroscopic RCR in the United States from 2013 to 2018 were identified from the IBM MarketScan Database. Primary outcome variables were total POPE and THU reimbursement, which were calculated for all claims in the 9-month perioperative period. Trends in outcome variables over time and differences across insurance types were analyzed. Multivariable analysis was performed to investigate drivers of POPE. RESULTS: A total of 52,330 arthroscopic RCR patients were identified. Between 2013 and 2018, median POPE increased by 47.5% ($917 to $1,353), and median THU increased by 9.3% ($11,964 to $13,076). Patients with high deductible insurance plans paid $1,910 toward their THU, 52.5% more than patients with preferred provider plans ($1,253, P = .001) and 280.5% more than patients with managed care plans ($502, P = .001). All components of POPE increased over the study period, with the largest observed increase being POPE for the immediate procedure (P = .001). On multivariable analysis, out-of-network facility, out-of-network surgeon, and high-deductible insurance most significantly increased POPE. CONCLUSIONS: POPE for arthroscopic RCR increased at a higher rate than THU over the study period, demonstrating that patients are paying an increasing proportion of RCR costs. A large percentage of this increase comes from increasing POPE for the immediate procedure. Out-of-network facility status increased POPE 3 times more than out-of-network surgeon status, and future cost-optimization strategies should focus on facility-specific reimbursements in particular. Last, ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) significantly reduced POPE, so performing arthroscopic RCRs at ASCs is beneficial to cost-minimization efforts. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study highlights that although payers have increased reimbursement for RCR, patient out-of-pocket expenditures have increased at a much higher rate. Furthermore, this study elucidates trends in and drivers of patient out-of-pocket payments for RCR, providing evidence for development of cost-optimization strategies and counseling of patients undergoing RCR.