Challenges and limitations in meta-analyses of complications in neurosurgery: Systematic review with proposed approach and checklist to mitigate errors and improve the assessment of the real-world experience.

Meta-analyses are highly valued in medical science, yet accurately reporting complications in neurosurgical studies remains challenging. Examples include inconsistencies in defining and classifying complications and variations in reporting methods. This lack of reproducibility and comparability, along with other issues related to biases, hinders the ability of meta-analyses to yield significant advancements. This systematic review investigated the challenges and limitations inherent in meta-analyses of complications in neurosurgery. Based on the identified challenges and our group's experience, we developed a practical checklist to mitigate and avoid common errors in meta-analyses of complications in neurosurgery.We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies addressing challenges in assessing complications in neurosurgery. The main findings were qualitatively synthesized to identify common challenges and limitations. The proposed checklist was developed using a modified Delphi technique. Eleven studies were included, uncovering heterogeneity and a lack of standardization regarding the classification of complications in neurosurgery across various authors and institutions. They suggested solutions such as implementing a more uniform classification system. Additionally, the NeuroComp Meta-Analysis Checklist was developed, comprising 23 items divided into 5 domains, with a practical approach and suggestions on how to deal with the challenges when meta-analyzing.We identified numerous challenges and concerns when assessing complications in the neurosurgical field. The NeuroComp Meta-Analysis Checklist incorporated methodologies and approaches we utilized in several previously published meta-analyses. While we acknowledge that the proposal cannot solve all the issues involved in comparing and meta-analyzing complications in neurosurgery, it has the potential to enhance the informativeness of future meta-analyses and help authors mitigate common errors. Ultimately, this tool has the potential to contribute to the advancement of accumulating real-world evidence in neurosurgical science.

Letter to the Editor: "Exploring optimal microscopic keyhole access to the skull base: an anatomical evaluation of transciliary supraorbital and transpalpebral orbitofrontal craniotomy approaches".

This letter to the editor examines the recent comparative study by Santos et al. (2024) on transciliary supraorbital (TCA) and transpalpebral (TPA) approaches for skull base access. The original article offers valuable insights into the anatomical distinctions and potential clinical applications of each approach. The letter praises the methodical analysis presented in the study while proposing future directions incorporating advanced imaging technologies and expanded clinical trials to enhance surgical precision and outcomes. Additionally, it suggests integrating longitudinal studies to evaluate patient outcomes, thereby refining the procedural choice based on specific clinical scenarios.

Letter to the Editor: Fincher syndrome: Insights into a rare neurosurgical condition.

Fincher syndrome is an exceptionally rare neurological problem which is characterized by simultaneous occurrence of spinal cord tumor and spinal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The article "Fincher syndrome: insights into a rare neurosurgical condition" explains about the pathophysiology, disease diagnosis, and possible treatment procedures of Fincher syndrome. Deep understanding about the syndrome will be useful to physicians and researchers for prompt detection and timely intervention of this rare condition.

Pre-hospital care, pre-hospital delay, and in-hospital delay in patients with traumatic brain injury in getting neurosurgical care in a tertiary care center: A Cross-Sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Timely institution of pre-hospital therapies aimed at damage control and the appropriately timed decision of transfer to higher centers for definitive neurosurgical management are crucial in determining the outcome of patients following traumatic brain injury. This study aimed to evaluate the factors determining pre-hospital care and delay in patients with traumatic brain injury. METHODS: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary care center after obtaining ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board (approval number 392 (6-11) E2). All patients with traumatic brain injury who presented to the emergency department from 1 July, 2018 to 15 June, 2019 were enrolled. Data related to patient demographics, the primary cause of the incident, grading of traumatic brain injury on admission, pre-hospital care, and variables that cause pre-hospital delay were collected. RESULTS: In this study of 144 patients with traumatic brain injury, we found that 70 (48.61%) experienced transfer delays exceeding one hour. There were 71 (49.31%) patients aged 15-44 years, and 100 (69.44%) were males , with falls being the primary cause of 119 (82.64%). Most patients had mild traumatic brain injury 80 (55.56%). Out of 144, 20 (13.89%) received prehospital care, and 28 (19.44%) underwent a computed tomography scan of the head before arrival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the challenges in pre-hospital care and delays in reaching for neurosurgical care in patients with traumatic brain injury. Falls, road accidents, and physical assaults were the leading causes.

Exo- and endoscopic two-step approach for meningeal tumours invading the lateral wall of large dural venous sinuses: how I do it.

BACKGROUND: Treating meningeal tumours invading the large dural venous sinuses is a subject of debate regarding the approach for removing the intra-sinus components. Additionally, directly observing the invasion site of tumours invading the lateral wall of the sinus is difficult. METHOD: We describe our exo- and endoscopic two-step approach (EETA): an exoscope is used to remove the extra-sinus component, while an endoscope is used to observe the invaded lateral wall and remove the intra-sinus component. CONCLUSION: EETA can be a viable option for treating meningeal tumours invading the venous sinus owing to its high resection rate and low invasiveness.

Tailored surgical approaches for spinal chordomas: A multidisciplinary perspective.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of spinal chordomas presents a significant challenge due to their resistance to both radiotherapy and chemotherapy as well as the complexity of the surgical procedures required. This study presents a series of cases of primary spinal chordomas, focusing on the development of a personalized therapeutic strategy that is tailored to each patient's unique clinical status. This approach aims to ensure that treatments are optimally aligned with the patient's overall prognosis and surgical eligibility. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 14 patients with primary spinal chordomas treated at our institution. We evaluated surgical strategies, clinical outcomes, and survival rates, The therapeutic strategy was formulated after interdisciplinary conferences with sarcoma management specialists. Data were collected on patient demographics, surgical details, postoperative outcomes, and follow-up status. RESULTS: All patients presented with neurological deficits preoperatively, which generally improved post-surgery. The study included a detailed analysis of two distinct surgical approaches: five patients underwent en bloc resection with dorsal stabilization and nine received decompression only. Patients undergoing en bloc resection showed a reduced need for additional surgery due to the comprehensive removal of the tumor. As anticipated, 40% of the patients who underwent decompression experienced tumor progression within the first three months. However, given the poor overall prognosis, the objective of maintaining neurological function was achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical en bloc resection offers a viable and effective intervention for spinal chordomas, enhancing neurological function. It is imperative to tailor treatment strategies to individual prognoses, integrating insights from multidisciplinary discussions that meticulously evaluate surgical risks. This collaborative approach aids in selecting the most appropriate surgical technique tailored to each patient's specific condition.

Excision of large median and ulnar nerve schwannomas: a case series.

OBJECTIVE: Schwannomas are benign, slow-growing tumors originating from Schwann cells in peripheral nerves, commonly affecting the median and ulnar nerves in the forearm and wrist. Surgical excision is the gold standard treatment. This study presents our treatment strategies and outcomes for large-sized ulnar and median nerve schwannomas at the forearm and wrist level. METHODS: From 2012 to 2023, we enrolled 15 patients with schwannomas over 2 cm in size in the median or ulnar nerve at the forearm and wrist. The study included 12 patients with median nerve schwannomas (mean age: 61 years) and 3 with ulnar nerve schwannomas (mean age: 68 years), with a mean follow-up of 26.9 months. RESULTS: After surgery, all patients with median nerve schwannomas experienced mild, transient numbness affecting fewer than two digits, resolving within six months without motor deficits. Ulnar nerve schwannoma excision caused mild numbness in two patients, also resolving within six months, but all three developed ulnar claw hand deformity, which persisted but improved at the last follow-up. Despite this, patients were satisfied with the surgery due to relief from severe tingling pain. CONCLUSIONS: Schwannomas of the median, ulnar, and other peripheral nerves should be removed by carefully dissecting the connecting nerve fascicles to avoid injury to healthy ones. Sensory deficits may occur but are unlikely to significantly impact quality of life. However, in motor-dominant nerves like the ulnar nerve, there is a risk of significant motor deficits that could affect hand function, though not completely. Therefore, thorough preoperative discussion and consideration of interfascicular nerve grafting are essential.

Circumferential exposure of the cavernous sinus and parasellar region through a combined open and endoscopic endonasal transcavernous approach, a morphometric study.

INTRODUCTION: Although recent trends currently favor the endoscopic endonasal transcavernous approach (EETA) over the pretemporal transcavernous approach (PTA) for certain cavernous sinus pathologies, dedicated assessment of the surgical exposure and maneuverability is wanting. Toward this aim, this morphometric study quantifies these variables within four cavernous sinus compartments by comparing the PTA, EETA, and a combined approach to achieve a circumferential dissection (EETA-PTA). MATERIAL: In five latex-injected specimens, exposure volumes of the EETA, PTA, and circumferential EETA-PTA approaches were quantified; the latter combined the most conservative options of both the endoscopic and open approaches. Two clinical cases illustrate the combined approach. RESULTS: EETA-PTA provided the largest volume of exposure (65.6% vs 35% PTA vs 44.6% EETA, P = 0.01) and eliminated the need to mobilize the ICA or cross cranial nerves. Although EETA and PTA approaches afforded comparable exposure volumes along the entire cavernous sinus (34.9 vs 44.6%), the EETA better exposed medial and inferior compartments (whereas the PTA exposed larger volumes in the lateral and superior compartments. The combined EETA-PTA yielded 66% of total cavernous sinus exposure volumes and eliminated the need to mobilize the ICA or cross cranial nerves. CONCLUSIONS: Our methodology aligns with strategies that use a modular concept to divide the skull base into compartments for maximal safe resection. Excluding soft tumors, the EETA is preferred for medial and inferior lesions and the PTA for superior and lateral lesions. A staged combined EETA-PTA may safely yield a 360-degree access for extensive multi-compartment lesions that span neurovascular structures within the cavernous sinus.

Fenestrated clipping of previously coiled posterior-superiorly projecting anterior communicating artery aneurysms: How I do it.

BACKGROUND: Anterior communicating artery (ACOM) aneurysms are among the most common aneurysms associated with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms I (N Engl J Med 339:1725-1733, 1998), Wiebers (Lancet 362:103-110, 2003)). Surgical clipping of posterior-superiorly projecting ACOM aneurysms can be challenging, as the ipsilateral A2 can interfere with clip trajectory and ACOM perforating vessels obstructed from view. Intraluminal coils can further increase the difficulty of the procedure. METHOD: The relevant surgical anatomy with illustration is presented. A video detailing our technique on an illustrative case is provided. CONCLUSION: Surgical clipping of posterior-superiorly projecting ACOM aneurysms can require complex clip configurations. We describe the key steps of posterior-superiorly projecting ACOM aneurysm clipping through a lateral supraorbital craniotomy and fenestrated tandem clipping.