Biologicals for the treatment of lupus nephritis: a Bayesian network meta-regression analysis.

Background: Previous studies comparing the efficacy and safety of different treatment regimens for lupus nephritis are scarce. Moreover, confounding factors such as the duration of follow-up were hardly adjusted in those studies, potentially compromising the results and their extents to clinical settings. Objective: To rigorously investigate the efficacy and safety of biologics in patients with lupus nephritis using Bayesian network meta-regression analyses that adjust for the follow-up period, in order to provide more robust evidence for clinicians. Methods: Databases comprising PubMed, Embase, MedlinePlus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholars, and Scopus were retrieved for eligible articles from inception to February 29, 2024. The primary endpoint was the complete response rate, the secondary endpoint was the partial response rate, the tertiary endpoints were the adverse events, and infection-related adverse events. Napierian Logarithm of hazard ratio (lnHR) and the standard error of lnHR (selnHR) were generated for dichotomous variants by STATA 18.0 MP and then put into Rstudio 4.3.2 to conduct Bayesian network meta-analysis as well as network meta-regression analysis to yield hazard ratio (HR) as pairwise effect size. Results: Ten studies involving 2138 patients and 11 treatment regimens were ultimately included. In the original analysis, for the primary endpoint, compared to the control group, obinutuzumab (22.6 months), abatacept-30mg (20.5 months), abatacept-10mg (17.8 months), and belimumab (23.3 months) demonstrated significant superiority (HR ranged from 1.6 to 2.5), more ever, their significance regarding relative efficacy was correlated with follow up period, namely "time window" (shown in parentheses above). For the secondary endpoint, compared to the control group, obinutuzumab and abatacept-30mg showed conspicuous preponderance (HR ranged from 1.6 to 2.4), "time window" was also detected in abatacept-30mg (20.5 months), whereas obinutuzumab remained consistently obviously effective regardless of the follow-up period (shown in parentheses above). For the tertiary endpoint, there were no differences among active regimens and control. Conclusions: Considering the efficacy and safety and "time window" phenomenon, we recommend obinutuzumab as the preferred treatment for LN. Certainly, more rigorous head-to-head clinical trials are warranted to validate those findings.

Fanconi syndrome and renal tubular necrosis in patients following ingestion of potentially contaminated red yeast rice supplement: Two case reports.

We present two cases of middle-aged men who developed Fanconi syndrome and renal dysfunction after consuming "foods with functional claims (FFC)" containing red yeast rice. In the first case, the patient had consumed an FFC for 1 year and another FFC suspected to have contained nephrotoxin for 3 weeks; kidney biopsy performed during the acute phase of renal injury showed severe acute tubular necrosis and tubular cell regeneration. He achieved near-complete recovery 40 days after the FFC was discontinued. In the second case, the patient had consumed FFC for 4 years and stopped 70 days prior to presentation; kidney biopsy revealed significant tubular recovery, persistent tubular injuries, and interstitial fibrosis. Although the manifestations of Fanconi syndrome subsided, mild renal dysfunction persisted. These cases suggest that FFC with nephrotoxins may induce Fanconi syndrome owing to acute tubular necrosis. Recovery is possible after discontinuing the FFC; while short-term ingestion of FFC allows for tubular regeneration, its long-term ingestion may cause irreversible damage and lead to chronic kidney disease. Long-term follow-up is crucial for preventing further renal deterioration.

Evaluation of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving different sequences of first- and second-line biologic treatments: findings from ROTARY.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at risk of developing dysplasia and, subsequently, colorectal cancer (CRC) owing to chronic inflammation. Patients may also experience other severe disease complications, such as hospitalization and surgery. Several biologics are available for the treatment of patients with IBD and some patients require multiple lines of treatment owing to loss of response or tolerability to their prescribed biologic. Previous studies suggest that the choice of initial biologic treatment may impact the outcomes of later treatment lines. In this study, we assessed adverse clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who received different biologic treatment sequences. METHODS: ROTARY part B was a retrospective cohort study using the Optum® Clinical Database that evaluated the incidences of IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, dysplasia, CRC, and infections in patients with CD or UC who received two biologics successively. First-line biologics included adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab (CD only), and vedolizumab; second-line biologics included infliximab and adalimumab. RESULTS: In patients with CD, the treatment sequence of ustekinumab to infliximab was associated with the highest overall incidences of hospitalization (51.9%), surgery (40.7%), CRC (3.7%), and infection (37.0%). Vedolizumab followed by an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of experiencing an adverse medical event (hospitalization, surgery, or infection) than two successive anti-TNFα treatments (odds ratio, 1.526; 95% confidence interval, 1.004-2.320; P < 0.05). In patients with UC, the treatment sequence of vedolizumab to adalimumab resulted in the lowest overall incidence of adverse outcomes (20.3%, 6.3%, 0.0%, 6.3%, and 4.7% for hospitalization, surgery, CRC, dysplasia, and infection, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We describe differences in adverse clinical outcomes associated with sequencing of biologics in patients with CD or UC and demonstrate favorable results in patients who received vedolizumab as a first-line biologic. These results provide potential guidance to clinicians choosing sequences of biologic treatments in patients with IBD.

Safety assessment of anti-B cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database.

Background: On April 18, 2024, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration officially required updating of the "boxed warning" for T cell malignancies for all chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies. Given the clinical significance of these therapies, a rigorous safety assessment is paramount. However, comprehensive real-world safety studies have been lacking for the newly marketed CAR-T products idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), which target B cell maturation antigen, especially regarding the risk of secondary malignancies. Therefore, we aimed to thoroughly analyze the adverse events (AEs) information in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to comprehensively understand the safety risks of ide-cel and cilta-cel. Methods: We extracted AE reports related to ide-cel and cilta-cel from the FAERS database (https://fis.fda.gov/extensions/FPD-QDE-FAERS/FPD-QDE-FAERS.html.) from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2023. Disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis were used to identify risk signals across subgroups and specific cases (including for death and secondary malignancies). Weibull distribution analysis was employed to determine the time to AE onset. Results: A total of 695 AE reports for ide-cel and 848 for cilta-cel were included in the FAERS database. This analysis identified 81 positive signals for ide-cel and 74 for cilta-cel. Notably, comparisons with the drug labels revealed "unexpected signals," including febrile bone marrow aplasia (reporting odds ratio=69.10; confidence interval 39.12-122.03) and plasma cell myeloma (12.45; 8.18-18.95) for ide-cel, and increased serum ferritin (24.98; 8.0-77.58) and large intestine perforation (18.57; 5.98-57.69) for cilta-cel. Both drugs showed a higher AE incidence among male recipients and patients aged ≥65 years, although female recipients faced a greater risk. Most AEs occurred at the early stage of administration. However, secondary malignancies were detected for both drugs, primarily occurring one-year post-administration. Conclusion: This study provides a foundation for understanding the safety profile of CAR-T cell therapy, particularly in relation to the emergence of secondary malignancies. Such insights are helpful for clinical decision-making and the safe and effective utilization of these therapeutic agents.

A retrospective study of efficacy of tofacitinib combined with bDMARDs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to bDMARDs.

INTRODUCTION: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by synovial inflammation, joint swelling, and pain involving multiple joints. While biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) are popular treatments for RA, there is limited research on their combined use. This study examined a cohort of RA patients who demonstrated inadequate response to bDMARDs and subsequently initiated combination therapy with tofacitinib and bDMARDs, assessing both the efficacy and safety profile of this therapeutic approach. METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively collected the electronic medical records (EMR) of 62 adult patients with RA who were admitted to the Fourth Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine between August 2018 and December 2022. All patients had received at least one bDMARD treatment for more than 3 months and still exhibited moderate-to-high disease activity. Tofacitinib 5 mg bid was added to their original biological treatment in 28 cases, and other 34 cases switched to another bDMARD or tsDMARD as control group. Treatment was continued for 24 weeks following the initiation of combination therapy. Changes in DAS28-ESR and ACR20, 50, 70 response rates at week 24 were collected and analyzed from baseline, while changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24 were also collected and analyzed. RESULTS: After 24 weeks of treatment, the DAS28-ESR score in combined treatment group decreased significantly from a baseline of 5.26 ± 0.90 (3.87-8.31) to 2.67 ± 0.86 (1.41-5.11), with remission achieved by 19 patients (67.9%) and low disease activity achieved by five patients (17.9%). The DAS28-ESR in the control group exhibited a decrease from 5.20 ± 0.77 (3.87-7.23) at baseline to 3.25 ± 1.29 (1.54-5.69). In all, 13 patients (38.2%) achieved remission, while another 11 patients (32.4%) achieved low disease activity. The ACR20, 50, 70 response rates were 85.71%, 75%, and 39.29% in the combined treatment group, whereas it were 75.0%, 53.57%, 21.43% in the control group. Additionally, both ESR and CRP levels decreased significantly during the course of treatment without any reported adverse events leading to discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Our findings offer some evidence, supporting the effectiveness and safety of combining bDMARD with JAKi tofacitinib in RA patients who have an inadequate response to bDMARD monotherapy. This combination effectively manages disease activity while maintaining a relatively low and manageable incidence of adverse events. Further prospective randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes are anticipated to provide evidence-based medical support.

Safety of biologic immunosuppressants in pregnant women with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) typically affect women of childbearing age. One of the challenges in treating these women during pregnancy is to manage the disease while minimizing or avoiding the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) that may increase the risk to the mother or fetus. Biologic therapy has transformed the management of these patients. This study aimed to evaluate the maternal-fetal safety and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with IMID exposed to biologic DMARDs either preconceptionally or during pregnancy and compare them with women using conventional DMARDs and a group of healthy pregnant women. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study with prospective follow-up of pregnant women with IMID at a single center. We analyzed baseline maternal demographic characteristics, diseases, DMARDs, and maternal-fetal outcomes. RESULTS: A cohort of 244 pregnancies was studied. One hundred twenty-eight patients met classificatory criteria for rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and 116 pregnancies of healthy women were evaluated from the same study period. One hundred and one pregnancies in IMID patients (89.84 %) occurred under immunosuppressive treatment, 78.91 % of IMID pregnancies were under cDMARD (33.59 % exclusive cDMARD), 56.25 % under bDMARD, and 27.34 % under oral glucocorticoids. Anti-TNF was the most frequent (88.88 %) bDMARD and was used in 50.78 % of the IMIDs. There was at least one flare in 37.10 % of the IMID pregnancies, and 9.38 % experienced more than one. Among flares, 43.48 % happened in the first trimester, 34.78 % in the second trimester, and 19.57 % in the third. Flares were more frequent in the RMD patients compared with IBD (p = 0.041; OR 2.15, 95%CI: 1.03-4.52). Flare was associated with discontinuation of bDMARD before the eighth week of gestation (p = 0.016), but especially in the second (p = 0.042) and third trimester (p = 0.012). Maternal infections were an infrequent complication overall (7.66 %), although more frequent in patients with IMIDs (p = 0.004) but were not associated with cDMARD or bDMARD. IMID patients needed assisted reproductive techniques (ART) more often (p = 0.001, OR 2.83, 95%CI: 1.02-7.90). More cesarean sections were performed in gestations under treatment with bDMARD (p = 0.020) and especially in those under treatment with anti-TNF. Aneuploidies calculation risk and fetal malformations were not correlated with DMARDs (cDMARDs, bDMARDs, or its combination) nor with any of the DMARDs individually preconcepcionally or during gestation. Small for gestational age (SGA) newborns were higher in patients with IMIDs however, it was not associated with DMARD use. DISCUSSION: In general, patients with IMIDs who require treatment with bDMARDs have a more severe or refractory disease prior to gestation. In our cohort, we found a higher risk of flare among patients with bDMARDs, especially when those were suspended early. Among maternal outcomes, we found that IMID patients needed ART more often. This is probably, first of all, because of maternal age. Among fetal outcomes, there are no differences in congenital malformations in the IMIDs and healthy patients and were not correlated with DMARDs. CONCLUSION: The use of bDMARDs was effective in disease control and safe from a maternal-fetal point of view, with no increase in prematurity, SGA, malformations, or infections.

Novel prognostic scoring systems for severe CRS and ICANS after anti-CD19 CAR T cells in large B-cell lymphoma.

Autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are now used in routine practice for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Severe (grade ≥ 3) cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS) are still the most concerning acute toxicities leading to frequent intensive care unit (ICU) admission, prolonging hospitalization, and adding significant cost to treatment. We report on the incidence of CRS and ICANS and the outcomes in a large cohort of 925 patients with LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) in France based on patient data captured through the DESCAR-T registry. CRS of any grade occurred in 778 patients (84.1%), with 74 patients (8.0%) with grade 3 CRS or higher, while ICANS of any grade occurred in 375 patients (40.5%), with 112 patients (12.1%) with grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Based on the parameters selected by multivariable analyses, two independent prognostic scoring systems (PSS) were derived, one for grade ≥ 3 CRS and one for grade ≥ 3 ICANS. CRS-PSS included bulky disease, a platelet count < 150 G/L, a C-reactive protein (CRP) level > 30 mg/L and no bridging therapy or stable or progressive disease (SD/PD) after bridging. Patients with a CRS-PSS score > 2 had significantly higher risk to develop grade ≥ 3 CRS. ICANS-PSS included female sex, low level of platelets (< 150 G/L), use of axi-cel and no bridging therapy or SD/PD after bridging. Patients with a CRS-PSS score > 2 had significantly higher risk to develop grade ≥ 3 ICANS. Both scores were externally validated in international cohorts of patients treated with tisa-cel or axi-cel.

Injection site reactions resulting from the use of biological therapy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

INTRODUCTION: Biological medications have significantly improved the prognosis of psoriasis patients. All biological drugs (except infliximab) for psoriasis require subcutaneous (SC) administration. Adverse events of biologic drug treatment include injection site reactions. ISRs are a local phenomenon characterized by swelling, erythema, pruritus, and pain around the injection site. AREAS COVERED: We conducted a review to analyze the differences between the ISRs of various biologics approved for psoriasis. Specifically, the review focused on anti-TNF-α, anti-IL12/23, anti-IL-17, and anti-IL-23 drugs. EXPERT OPINION: Etanercept and adalimumab have reported ISR rates of 37% and 20%, respectively, with erythema, pruritus, pain, and irritation being the most common. Citrate free (CF) solution and thinner needles have reduced ISR associated with adalimumab. Ustekinumab showed a low risk of ISR. Regarding secukinumab and ixekizumab, pain was found to be the most common ISR. The introduction of CF ixekizumab formulation has shown promise in reducing ISRs associated with ixekizumab. The risk of ISR appears insignificant with bimekizumab, brodalumab, and anti-IL23 drugs, with ISR rates ranging from less than 1% to 7.1%. The choice of biologic agent should consider ISR risk. Education on injection techniques and the use of single-dose autoinjectors/pens can mitigate ISR risk.

Peri-Arthroscopic Management of Immunosuppressive Medications in Patients with Rheumatic Disease A Survey of Practice Trends Among Rheumatologists and Sports Medicine Orthopedic Surgeons.

PURPOSE: Rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons frequently collaborate on difficult decisions regarding perioperative management of immunosuppression in rheumatic disease patients, balancing risk of postoperative infection with risk of disease flares. Current evidence-based guidelines pertain specifically to arthroplasty, thus we sought to understand the trends and common practices regarding peri-arthroscopic use of immunosuppression. METHODS: Rheumatologists and sports medicine surgeons, from a variety of New York hospitals and serving a broad range of demographics, were surveyed on immunosuppressive medication management in rheumatic disease patients undergoing arthroscopic surgeries. Physicians' preferences were elicited regarding the use of common anti-rheumatic medications with the lower risk meniscectomies and the higher risk anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions and allografts. Physicians were asked specifically about peri-arthroscopic use of conventional synthetic diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), biologics, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. RESULTS: During the survey period, 25 rheumatologists and 19 sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons completed the questionnaire. For lower-risk arthroscopies, rheumatologists favored continuing various csDMARDs (72% to 100%), biologics (50% to 64%) and JAK inhibitors (57%), while a majority of surgeons concurred for all three drug classes (csDMARDs 63%; biologics 53%; and JAK inhibitors 58%). For higher-risk arthroscopies, most rheumatologists preferred that patients continue csDMARDs (63% to 100%) but fewer supported the use of biologics (28% to 39%) or JAK inhibitors (22%). Surgeons were more hesitant to endorse any class of immunosuppressive antirheumatic medications (22% to 27%) around these higher risk surgeries. The rheumatologists were most concerned about surgeries taking place too soon after the last dose of rituximab, recommending these higher risk surgeries not take place for 7.7 ± 8.8 weeks following the last infusion. CONCLUSION: For lower-risk arthroscopies, most rheumatologists but only about half of orthopedic surgeons preferred patients continuing csDMARDs. Approximately half of both groups preferred patients hold biologics and JAK inhibitors. In more involved arthroscopies, most rheumatologists but few orthopedists supported the continued use of csDMARDs, and the consensus was to hold all other immunosuppression when possible. While the duration medications were held perioperatively were somewhat reflective of the current guidelines for arthroplasty, there is a need for evidencebased guidelines specifically regarding peri-arthroscopy immunosuppression in rheumatic disease patients.

Bendamustine is a safe and effective lymphodepletion agent for axicabtagene ciloleucel in patients with refractory or relapsed large B-cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Fludarabine in combination with cyclophosphamide (FC) is the standard lymphodepletion regimen for CAR T-cell therapy (CAR T). A national fludarabine shortage in 2022 necessitated the exploration of alternative regimens with many centers employing single-agent bendamustine as lymphodepletion despite a lack of clinical safety and efficacy data. To fill this gap in the literature, we evaluated the safety, efficacy, and expansion kinetics of bendamustine as lymphodepletion prior to axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) therapy. METHODS: 84 consecutive patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma treated with axi-cel and managed with a uniform toxicity management plan at Stanford University were studied. 27 patients received alternative lymphodepletion with bendamustine while 57 received FC. RESULTS: Best complete response rates were similar (73.7% for FC and 74% for bendamustine, p=0.28) and there was no significant difference in 12-month progression-free survival or overall survival estimates (p=0.17 and p=0.62, respectively). The frequency of high-grade cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was similar in both the cohorts. Bendamustine cohort experienced lower proportions of hematological toxicities and antibiotic use for neutropenic fever. Immune reconstitution, as measured by quantitative assessment of cellular immunity, was better in bendamustine cohort as compared with FC cohort. CAR T expansion as measured by peak expansion and area under the curve for expansion was comparable between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Bendamustine is a safe and effective alternative lymphodepletion conditioning for axi-cel with lower early hematological toxicity and favorable immune reconstitution.

Comparing 2-day vs 3-day flu-CY lymphodepleting regimens for CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in patients with non-hodgkin's lymphoma.

Introduction: Lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC) is critical to CAR T-cell expansion and efficacy. Despite this, there is not a consensus in the literature regarding the optimal LDC regimen, including dose and frequency. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients at a single institution that received LDC prior to treatment with the CD19 directed CAR T-cell products axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel. Patients treated at our center received fludarabine 30 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 for 3 consecutive days prior to May 2019. After this timepoint patients routinely received fludarabine 40 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 for 2 consecutive days. Clinical data from each cohort were obtained from the electronic medical record and compared for differences in CAR T-cell efficacy and toxicity. Results: From June 2018 to August 2023, LDC was given to 92 patients prior to CD19 directed CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Twenty-eight patients received a 3-day regimen, and 64 patients received a 2-day regimen. In the total cohort, 75% of patients received axicabtagene ciloleucel and 25% received tisagenlecleucel. The overall response rates in both the 2-day regimen group and the 3-day regimen group were similar (69% vs 75%, p= 0.21) as were the complete response rates (50% vs 54%, p=0.82). There were no significant differences between the 2-day and 3-day regimens for grade 2-4 cytokine release syndrome (55% vs 50%, p=0.82), grade 2-4 immune effector cell associated-neurotoxicity syndrome (42% vs 29%, p=0.25), or time to resolution of neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. The rate of prolonged platelet recovery lasting greater than 60 days was higher with the 3-day regimen (9% vs 27%, p=0.026). Discussion: As the number of patients eligible for CAR T-cell therapy continues to increase, optimizing each component of therapy is necessary. We show that a 2-day regimen of LDC with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide is feasible without significant impact on CAR T-cell efficacy or toxicity. Prospective studies are necessary to further determine the most effective LDC regimen.

A Multicenter Real-life Prospective Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel Toxicity and Outcomes in Large B-cell Lymphomas.

This real-world prospective observational study across 21 Italian centers (CART-SIE) compares axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) outcomes in 485 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma with baseline characteristics matched by stabilized inverse propensity score weighting. Axi-cel versus tisa-cel had higher all-grade cytokine release syndrome (78.6% vs. 89.3%, P = 0.0017) and neurotoxicity (9.9% vs. 32.2%, P < 0.0001) but also superior progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year (46.5% vs. 34.1%, P = 0.0009). Even among patients who failed bridging therapy, axi-cel PFS was superior to tisa-cel (37.5% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.0059). Differences in overall survival and high-grade immune toxicities were not significant. The CAR-HEMATOTOX score not only predicted hematologic toxicity but also 1-year survival outcomes (51.5% in CAR-HEMATOTOX high vs. 77.2% in CAR-HEMATOTOX low, P < 0.0001). Twenty patients developed second primary malignancies, including two cases of T-cell neoplasms. These findings enable more informed selection of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, balancing bridging, safety, and efficacy considerations for individual patients. Significance: The findings of this study on 485 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma treated with commercial axi-cel and tisa-cel indicate axi-cel's superior PFS after propensity score weighting. The predictive utility of CAR-HEMATOTOX in assessing not only toxicity but also outcomes across both CAR T-cell products may guide future risk-stratified management strategies.

Adverse effects of anti-cancer biologics on the ocular surface.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cancer immunotherapy is one of the most emerging and rapidly growing fields.Ocular side effects associated with these therapies are common and can be present in up to 70% of patients.The cornea may be involved in different pathogenic mechanisms triggered by different immunotherapeutic agents, and corneal disease varies from mild symptoms to severe corneal ulceration and melting with visual loss.We aimed to review the incidence, mechanism, and management of ocular surface side effects in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. RECENT FINDINGS: With the recent use of immunotherapeutic agents in cancer patients, in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, ocular surface and corneal involvement are common side effects.These patients can be at risk of sight threatening complications that warrant prompt diagnosis and careful monitoring and management. SUMMARY: Immunotherapy- related corneal complications in cancer patients are associated with a decreased quality of life. Prompt recognition and an interdisciplinary approach between ophthalmologists and oncologists are crucial to handle immune related ocular adverse events in these patients, in order to maintain ocular surface integrity and avoid a vision threatening complication.

Development of Interoperable Computable Phenotype Algorithms for Adverse Events of Special Interest to Be Used for Biologics Safety Surveillance: Validation Study.

BACKGROUND: Adverse events associated with vaccination have been evaluated by epidemiological studies and more recently have gained additional attention with the emergency use authorization of several COVID-19 vaccines. As part of its responsibility to conduct postmarket surveillance, the US Food and Drug Administration continues to monitor several adverse events of special interest (AESIs) to ensure vaccine safety, including for COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: This study is part of the Biologics Effectiveness and Safety Initiative, which aims to improve the Food and Drug Administration's postmarket surveillance capabilities while minimizing public burden. This study aimed to enhance active surveillance efforts through a rules-based, computable phenotype algorithm to identify 5 AESIs being monitored by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention for COVID-19 or other vaccines: anaphylaxis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, myocarditis/pericarditis, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, and febrile seizure. This study examined whether these phenotypes have sufficiently high positive predictive value (PPV) to ensure that the cases selected for surveillance are reasonably likely to be a postbiologic adverse event. This allows patient privacy, and security concerns for the data sharing of patients who had nonadverse events can be properly accounted for when evaluating the cost-benefit aspect of our approach. METHODS: AESI phenotype algorithms were developed to apply to electronic health record data at health provider organizations across the country by querying for standard and interoperable codes. The codes queried in the rules represent symptoms, diagnoses, or treatments of the AESI sourced from published case definitions and input from clinicians. To validate the performance of the algorithms, we applied them to electronic health record data from a US academic health system and provided a sample of cases for clinicians to evaluate. Performance was assessed using PPV. RESULTS: With a PPV of 93.3%, our anaphylaxis algorithm performed the best. The PPVs for our febrile seizure, myocarditis/pericarditis, thrombocytopenia syndrome, and Guillain-Barré syndrome algorithms were 89%, 83.5%, 70.2%, and 47.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Given our algorithm design and performance, our results support continued research into using interoperable algorithms for widespread AESI postmarket detection.

Approach to the patient with eosinophilia in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and biologicals.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we aim to explore the optimal approach to patients presenting with eosinophilia, considering recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Specifically, we focus on the integration of novel therapies into clinical practice to improve patient outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Advanced insights into the clinical and genetic features of eosinophilic disorders have prompted revisions in diagnostic criteria by the World Health Organization classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC). These changes reflect a growing understanding of disease pathogenesis and the development of targeted treatment options. The therapeutic landscape now encompasses a range of established and novel therapies. For reactive conditions, drugs targeting the eosinophilopoiesis, such as those aimed at interleukin-5 or its receptor, have demonstrated significant potential in decreasing blood eosinophil levels and minimizing disease flare-ups and relapse. These therapies have the potential to mitigate the side effects commonly associated with prolonged use of oral corticosteroids or immunosuppressants. Myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase (TK) gene fusions are managed by various TK inhibitors with variable efficacy. Diagnosis and treatment rely on a multidisciplinary approach. By incorporating novel treatment options into clinical practice, physicians across different disciplines involved in the management of eosinophilic disorders can offer more personalized and effective care to patients. However, challenges remain in accurately diagnosing and risk-stratifying patients, as well as in navigating the complexities of treatment selection.