Romiplostim in chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia: A review of the literature.

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a common challenge of cancer therapy and can lead to chemotherapy dose reduction, delay, and/or discontinuation, affecting relative dose intensity, and possibly adversely impacting cancer care. Besides changing anticancer regimens, standard management of CIT has been limited to platelet transfusions and supportive care. Use of the thrombopoietin receptor agonist romiplostim, already approved for use in immune thrombocytopenia, has shown promising signs of efficacy in CIT. In a phase 2 prospective randomized study of solid tumor patients with platelet counts <100 × 109/L for ≥4 weeks due to CIT, weekly romiplostim corrected the platelet count to >100 × 109/L in 93% (14/15) of patients within 3 weeks versus 12.5% (1/8) of untreated patients (p < 0.001). Including patients treated with romiplostim in an additional single-arm cohort, 85% (44/52) of all romiplostim-treated patients responded with platelet count correction within 3 weeks. Several retrospective studies of CIT have also shown responses to weekly romiplostim, with the largest study finding that poor response to romiplostim was predicted by tumor invasion of the bone marrow (odds ratio, 0.029; 95% CI: 0.0046-0.18; p < 0.001), prior pelvic irradiation (odds ratio, 0.078; 95% CI: 0.0062-0.98; p = 0.048), and prior temozolomide treatment (odds ratio 0.24; 95% CI: 0.061-0.96; p = 0.043). Elsewhere, lower baseline TPO levels were predictive of romiplostim response (p = 0.036). No new safety signals have emerged from romiplostim CIT studies. Recent treatment guidelines, including those from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, now support consideration of romiplostim use in CIT. Data are expected from two ongoing phase 3 romiplostim CIT trials.

An IL-7 fusion protein targeting EDA fibronectin upregulates TCF1 on CD8+ T-cells, preferentially accumulates to neoplastic lesions, and boosts PD-1 blockade.

BACKGROUND: Anti-PD-1 antibodies have revolutionized cancer immunotherapy due to their ability to induce long-lasting complete remissions in a proportion of patients. Current research efforts are attempting to identify biomarkers and suitable combination partners to predict or further improve the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Antibody-cytokine fusions are a class of pharmaceuticals that showed the potential to boost the anticancer properties of other immunotherapies. Extradomain A-fibronectin (EDA-FN), which is expressed in most solid and hematological tumors but is virtually undetectable in healthy adult tissues, is an attractive target for the delivery of cytokine at the site of the disease. METHODS: In this work, we describe the generation and characterization of a novel interleukin-7-based fusion protein targeting EDA-FN termed F8(scDb)-IL7. The product consists of the F8 antibody specific to the alternatively spliced EDA of FN in the single-chain diabody (scDb) format fused to human IL-7. RESULTS: F8(scDb)-IL7 efficiently stimulates human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro. Moreover, the product significantly increases the expression of T Cell Factor 1 (TCF-1) on CD8+T cells compared with an IL2-fusion protein. TCF-1 has emerged as a pivotal transcription factor that influences the durability and potency of immune responses against tumors. In preclinical cancer models, F8(scDb)-IL7 demonstrates potent single-agent activity and eradicates sarcoma lesions when combined with anti-PD-1. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide the rationale to explore the combination of F8(scDb)-IL7 with anti-PD-1 antibodies for the treatment of patients with cancer.

Macular Degeneration Drug Prescribing Patterns After Step Therapy Introduction in Medicare Advantage.

Importance: In Medicare Advantage (MA), step therapy for physician-administered drugs is an approach to lowering drug spending. The impact of step therapy in MA on prescribing behavior and the magnitude of any changes has not been analyzed. Objective: To evaluate the impact of step therapy on macular degeneration drug prescribing patterns for 3 large MA insurers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective encounter-based analysis using 20% nationally representative MA outpatient and carrier encounter records for 2017 to 2019. Participants were MA beneficiaries who were 65 years or older and had received a macular degeneration drug administration. Macular degeneration drug administrations for beneficiaries of MA Aetna, Humana, and UnitedHealthcare (UHC) insurers were assessed. Humana implemented macular degeneration step therapy in 2019, setting bevacizumab as the plan-preferred drug, and aflibercept and ranibizumab as the plan-nonpreferred drugs. Aetna and UHC, which did not implement macular degeneration step therapy, served as the control group. Data analyses were performed from May 2024 to December 2024. Exposures: A macular degeneration drug administration subject to a step therapy policy. Main Outcome and Measures: A binary indicator of whether the drug administered was bevacizumab. Linear probability models and a difference-in-differences framework were used to quantify changes in prescribing patterns before and after the introduction of step therapy for MA insurers that did and did not implement step therapy. To empirically measure the impact of step therapy, the first administration of a treatment episode was assessed, followed by switching patterns. Results: A total of 18 331 MA beneficiaries, 21 683 treatment episodes, and 171 985 drug administrations were included across the control and treatment groups. The difference-in-differences regressions found a 7.8% (95% CI, 4.9%-10.7%; P < .001) greater probability of being prescribed bevacizumab for the first administration due to step therapy. The predicted probabilities of preferred-drug administration in the treatment group increased from 0.61 to 0.70 between the periods before and after step therapy implementation for the first administration. Step therapy was not significantly associated with an increased rate of medication switching (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.71-1.06; P = .15). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this retrospective encounter-based analysis indicate that step therapy is associated with a greater probability of prescribing the plan-preferred drug for the first administration. The analysis failed to find a statistically significant greater rate of medication switching within a treatment episode. Step therapy changed macular degeneration prescribing patterns, but step therapy alone did not transition all administrations to the plan-preferred drug.

Aflibercept for central retinal vein occlusions: long-term outcomes of a 'Treat-and-Extend' regimen.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study reports on the long-term functional and anatomical outcomes of patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) treated under the Bern treat-and-extend (T&E) protocol. METHODS: Observational study. Treatment-naive patients with CRVO and consecutive macular oedema treated with aflibercept were included. The T&E protocol involved 2 monthly injections followed by an extension based on individual assessments. At each visit, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography imaging and a 2 mg aflibercept injection were administered. Changes in BCVA, proportion of patients gaining ≥15 letters, central subfield thickness (CST) and treatment intervals were analysed. RESULTS: Out of 173 patients, 64 had a follow-up of at least 2 years. BCVA improved from 46.7±25.3 at baseline to 78.3±0.5 at year 9. The proportion of patients with ≥15 letters gained was 56%, 53%, 56%, 62%, 52%, 52%, 43%, 50% and 33% at years 1-9, respectively. CST decreased significantly from 660±242 µm at baseline to 359±63 µm at year 9. Treatment intervals extended from 4 weeks initially to an average of 13.0±4.1 weeks by year 8. CONCLUSIONS: The T&E regimen for CRVO shows sustained visual improvements and reduced CST over time. Patients maintained stable visual gains for many years, demonstrating the effectiveness of this treatment approach. However, no control group was available to compare our T&E regimen with other strategies.

Improved efficacy of pembrolizumab combined with soluble EphB4-albumin in HPV-negative EphrinB2 positive head neck squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with relapsed or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after primary local therapy have low response rates with cetuximab, systemic chemotherapy or check point inhibitor therapy. Novel combination therapies with the potential to improve outcomes for patients with HNSCC is an area of high unmet need. METHODS: This is a phase II single-arm clinical trial of locally advanced or metastatic HNSCC patients treated with a combination of soluble EphB4-human serum albumin (sEphB4-HSA) fusion protein and pembrolizumab after platinum-based chemotherapy with up to 2 prior lines of treatment. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability and the primary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). HPV status and EphrinB2 expression were evaluated for outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Median follow up was 40.4 months (range 9.8 - 40.4). There were 6 responders (ORR 24%). There were 5 responders in the 11 HPV-negative and EphrinB2 positive patients, (ORR 45%) with 2 of these patients achieving a complete response (CR). The median PFS in HPV-negative/EphrinB2 positive patients was 3.2 months (95% CI 1.1, 7.3). Median OS in HPV-negative/EphrinB2 positive patients was 10.9 months (95% CI 2.0, 13.7). Hypertension, transaminitis and fatigue were the most common toxicities. DISCUSSION: The combination of sEphB4-HSA and pembrolizumab has a favorable toxicity profile and favorable activity particularly among HPV-negative EphrinB2 positive patients with HNSCC.

Short-Term Comparison of Switching to Brolucizumab or Faricimab from Aflibercept in Neovascular AMD Patients.

Background and Objectives: In this study, our objective was to assess and compare the changes in visual and structural outcomes among patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who were switched from intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) to either intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) or intravitreal faricimab (IVF) injections in a clinical setting. Materials and Methods: This observational clinical study included 20 eyes of 20 patients switched to brolucizumab and 15 eyes of 14 patients switched to faricimab from aflibercept in eyes with nAMD. We measured the structural outcome (central macular thickness (CMT)) and the visual outcome (best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA); logMAR) as follows: just before the most recent IVA injection (B0), one month after the most recent IVA injection (B1), just before the first IVBr or IVF injection (A0), one month after (A1) and three months after (A3) the first IVBr or IVF injection. Results: BCVA showed significant improvement at A1 (0.25 ± 0.34) and at A3 (0.19 ± 0.24) compared to A0 (0.38 ± 0.35) in the IVBr group (p = 0.0156, p = 0.0166, respectively). CMT (µm) was significantly thinner at A1 (IVBr: 240.55 ± 51.82, IVF: 234.91 ± 47.29) and at A3 (IVBr: 243.21 ± 76.15, IVF: 250.50 ± 72.61) compared to at A0 (IVBr: 303.55 ± 79.18, IVF: 270.33 ± 77.62) in the IVBr group (A1: p = 0.0093, A3: p = 0.0026) and in the IVF group (A1: p = 0.0161, A3: p = 0.0093). There was no significant difference in BCVA and CMT improvement observed between two groups at any time point (p > 0.05 for all). Conclusions: Switching from aflibercept to either brolucizumab or faricimab has a significant anatomical effect in eyes with nAMD and both treatments appear to be effective short-term treatment options. There is a trend towards greater visual improvements and reductions in CMT with brolucizumab.

ANO2 Genetic Variants and Anti-VEGF Treatment Response in Neovascular AMD: A Pharmacogenetic Substudy of VIEW 1 and VIEW 2.

Purpose: This analysis investigated potential associations between gene variants and clinical end points in the VIEW 1 and 2 randomized clinical trials of intravitreal aflibercept and ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: A genome-wide association analysis was conducted in a subgroup of patients from VIEW 1 and 2 consenting to the optional pharmacogenetic analysis. Results: Data were pooled from 780 samples from patients representative of the overall VIEW 1 and 2 populations. After Bonferroni correction for multiplicity and statistical adjustment for baseline risk factors, no significant associations were found between previously identified prognostic AMD gene variants and treatment response according to key prespecified VIEW 1 and 2 end points. Genome-wide, there were no significant genetic associations in patients experiencing gains of ≥15 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters after 1 or 2 years of treatment. A cluster of variants in ANO2 (encoding anoctamin 2, a calcium-activated chloride channel expressed on photoreceptor cells) on chromosome 12 reached the level of significance for loss of ≥5 letters after 1 year of treatment (P < 5 × 10-8), with the ANO2 rs2110166 SNP demonstrating highly significant association (P = 1.99 × 10-8). Carriers of the ANO2 rs2110166 TT genotype showed a robust increase in visual acuity versus baseline compared with a small decrease in those with the TC genotype. Conclusions: None of the potential prognostic candidate genes were associated with the clinical end points for treated patients. Preliminary analyses suggest an association of ANO2 with retinal function, with a potential impact on vision of approximately one line over at least the first year. Further investigation of the function of ANO2 in retinal pathophysiology is merited.

Romiplostim for treatment of thrombocytopenia in dogs: A retrospective assessment and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Romiplostim, a thrombopoietin analog, is commonly used to treat immune-mediated thrombocytopenia (ITP) in humans, but its use in dogs remains limited. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the effects and adverse events of romiplostim administration in dogs with thrombocytopenia caused by various underlying diseases. ANIMALS: Forty-two client-owned dogs with naturally occurring thrombocytopenia at 2 referral animal hospitals. METHODS: Retrospective, multi-institutional analysis to evaluate the outcomes of romiplostim treatment in dogs. RESULTS: Among the dogs treated with romiplostim, 27 experienced an increase in platelet count and 26 maintained a platelet count within the reference range. Platelet count improvement was observed in various conditions: primary ITP (90%, n = 18/20), pancytopenia of unknown etiology (42.9%, n = 3/7), chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (50%, n = 3/6), babesiosis (100%, n = 1/1), radiotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (0%, n = 0/1), and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (33.3%, n = 2/6). The median time for platelet recovery (>50 000/µL) after romiplostim administration was 4 days, and the median time for platelet count normalization was 7 days. Median hospitalization time for the improvement group (I) was 5 days. The survival-to-discharge rates were 85%, 40%, and 28.6% for dogs with primary ITP, secondary thrombocytopenia, and thrombocytopenia of unknown etiology, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Romiplostim is a well-tolerated and promising treatment for primary ITP in dogs, suggesting its potential as a valuable therapeutic option for dogs with thrombocytopenia caused by various underlying conditions. These findings emphasize the need for further research to optimize romiplostim dosing and understand its role in treating secondary thrombocytopenia and pancytopenia of unknown etiology.

[Aflibercept in a real-world setting: the AURIGA study : 24-month results of the German cohort of treatment-naïve patients with macular edema following retinal vein occlusion receiving intravitreal aflibercept]. / Aflibercept im klinischen Alltag: die AURIGA-Studie : 24-Monats-Ergebnisse der deutschen Kohorte behandlungsnaiver Patienten mit Makulaödem bei retinalem Venenverschluss unter Therapie mit intravitrealem Aflibercept.

BACKGROUND: AURIGA is the largest prospective real-world study to evaluate intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg (IVT-AFL) treatment of macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and diabetic macular edema. Here we present the 24-month data from the German cohort of treatment-naïve patients with ME due to RVO. METHODS: Treatment-naïve patients with ME secondary to RVO were treated with IVT-AFL 2 mg in the routine clinical practice. The primary endpoint was mean change in visual acuity (VA, early treatment diabetic retinopathy, ETDRS, letters) at month 12 compared to baseline. Analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: Analysis included 130 patients with RVO (n = 61, 46.9% with central RVO, n = 69, 53.1% with branch RVO). The mean (± SD) time the RVO patients remained in the study was 18.4 ± 7.4 months. The mean VA gain (95% confidence interval) in the overall cohort was +10.9 (7.5-14.2) letters at month 12 and +9.7 (6.1-13.3) at month 24 (baseline VA 56.5 ± 18.9 letters). At 24 months, 67% of RVO patients gained ≥5 letters and 40% gained ≥15 letters. The mean number of injections was 4.4 ± 1.3 up to month 6, 6.2 ± 2.7 up to month 12 and 8.2 ± 4.5 up to month 24. The mean central retinal thickness (CRT) reduction was -206µm (-252 to -160µm) at 12 months and -219µm (-263 to -175µm) at 24 months (baseline CRT 507 ± 177 µm). The safety profile was consistent with that of previous studies. DISCUSSION: In the German AURIGA cohort of treatment-naïve patients with ME secondary to RVO, IVT-AFL 2 mg treatment in clinical practice resulted in rapid and clinically relevant VA gains and a reduction in CRT. These results were largely maintained over 24 months despite the low injection frequency from month 6.

Romiplostim use in immune thrombocytopenia: Experience in Cuenca, Ecuador / Uso de romiplostim en trombocitopenia inmunitaria: experiencia en Cuenca (Ecuador)

Introduction. The international consensus and the American Society of Hematology guidelines from 2019 established thrombopoietin analogues as the second-line therapy for primary immune thrombocytopenia cases. Objectives. To describe romiplostim usefulness in patients with immune thrombocytopenia in a third-level hospital in Cuenca, Ecuador. Materials and methods. We conducted a descriptive and retrospective study in patients with immune thrombocytopenia treated with romiplostim. We evaluated the following variables: age, gender, previous therapies to romiplostim, dose, frequency, complications, change of thrombopoietin analogue, and treatment discontinuation. Results. We included 21 patients with immune thrombocytopenia treated with romiplostim, with a median age of 49 years. All patients received corticosteroids as first-line treatment. Three patients required longer administration intervals (over a week), with weekly doses lower than those recommended (< 1 µg/kg). Due to lack of efficacy, six patients replaced elthrombopag with romiplostim. Of the total, three suffered thrombotic complications: two had portal venous thrombosis, and one had pulmonary thromboembolism; five of the patients discontinued romiplostim scheme without resuming it. Conclusions. Romiplostim constitutes a convenient second-line therapy in immune thrombocytopenia. Despite the small sample size, romiplostim early use can minimize toxicities and infectious risks.

Introducción: El consenso internacional y la guía del 2019 de la American Society of Hematology, establecieron a los análogos de la trombopoyetina como medicamentos de segunda línea para tratar la trombocitopenia inmunitaria primaria. En Ecuador, se comercializan dos trombomiméticos: romiplostim y eltrombopag OBJETIVOS: Describir el uso de romiplostim en pacientes con trombocitopenia inmunitaria, en un hospital de tercer nivel en Cuenca (Ecuador). Materiales y métodos. Se adelantó un estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo en pacientes con trombocitopenia inmunitaria y tratamiento con romiplostim. Se evaluaron las siguientes variables: edad, sexo, tratamientos previos a romiplostim, dosis, frecuencia, complicaciones, cambio de análogo de trombopoyetina y discontinuación de la terapia. RESULTADOS: Veintiún pacientes con trombocitopenia inmunitaria fueron tratados con romiplostim, con una mediana de 49 años. Todos recibieron corticoides como tratamiento de primera línea. Tres precisaron de intervalos más prolongados que el semanal, con dosis semanales menores de las recomendadas (< 1 µg/kg). Por falta de eficacia, en seis pacientes se reemplazó la terapia con eltrombopag por romiplostim. Tres pacientes padecieron complicaciones trombóticas: dos, trombosis venosa portal, y uno, tromboembolia pulmonar. En cinco, se discontinuó el tratamiento con romiplostim, sin necesidad de reanudarlo. CONCLUSIONES: Romiplostim constituye un tratamiento de segunda línea para la trombocitopenia inmunitaria primaria. A pesar del reducido tamaño de la muestra, se observó que la administración temprana del medicamento puede minimizar toxicidades y riesgos infecciosos.

The real-world observational prospective study of health outcomes with dulaglutide and liraglutide in type 2 diabetes patients (TROPHIES): resource use and costs of treatment in clinical practice in France, Germany, and Italy.

AIMS: To describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs after initiation of injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) therapy by adult patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the prospective, observational, 24-month TROPHIES study in France, Germany, and Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HCRU data for cost calculations were collected by treating physicians during patient interviews at baseline and follow-up visits approximately 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after GLP-1 RA initiation with once-weekly dulaglutide or once-daily liraglutide. Costs were evaluated from the national healthcare system (third-party payer) perspective and updated to 2018 prices. RESULTS: In total, 2,005 patients were eligible for the HCRU analysis (1,014 dulaglutide; 991 liraglutide). Baseline patient characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups and countries. The largest proportions of patients using ≥2 oral glucose-lowering medications (GLMs) at baseline (42.9-43.4%) and month 24 (44.0-45.1%) and using another injectable GLM at month 24 (15.3-23.2%) were in France. Mean numbers of primary and secondary healthcare contacts during each assessment period were highest in France (range = 4.0-10.7) and Germany (range = 2.9-5.7), respectively. The greatest proportions (≥60%) of mean annualized costs per patient comprised medication costs. Mean annualized HCRU costs per patient varied by treatment cohort and country: the highest levels were in the liraglutide cohort in France (€909) and the dulaglutide cohort in Germany (€883). LIMITATIONS: Limitations included exclusion of patients using insulin at GLP-1 RA initiation and collection of HCRU data by physician, not via patient-completed diaries. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world HCRU and costs associated with the treatment of adults with T2D with two GLP-1 RAs in TROPHIES emphasize the need to avoid generalization with respect to HCRU and costs associated with a particular therapy when estimating the impact of a new treatment in a country-specific setting.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have become frequent treatments of hyperglycemia in type-2 diabetes (T2D). Not all types of clinical study provide information about the cost of these treatments or the effects they might have on use of other medicines and equipment to control T2D or the need for visits to a doctor or nurse and different types of treatment in hospital. This study collected this information during the regular care of adults in France, Germany, or Italy who were prescribed either dulaglutide or liraglutide (both types of GLP-1 RAs) by their family doctor or a specialist in T2D. There were differences in costs and the need for other medicines and medical services between people using either dulaglutide or liraglutide and for people who were using the same GLP-1 RA in each of the three countries. The information from this study could be used to more accurately understand the overall costs and medical care needed when patients use dulaglutide or liraglutide in France, Germany, or Italy.

Luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): primary analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The preplanned interim analysis of the COMMANDS trial showed greater efficacy of luspatercept than epoetin alfa for treating anaemia in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-naive patients with transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. In this Article, we report the results of the primary analysis of the trial. METHODS: COMMANDS is a phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial conducted at 142 sites in 26 countries. Eligible patients were those aged 18 years or older, with myelodysplastic syndromes of very low risk, low risk, or intermediate risk (as defined by the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System), who were ESA-naive and transfusion dependent, and had a serum erythropoietin concentration of less than 500 U/L. Patients were stratified by baseline red blood cell transfusion burden, serum erythropoietin concentration, and ring sideroblast status, and randomly allocated (1:1) to receive luspatercept (1·0-1·75 mg/kg body weight, subcutaneously, once every 3 weeks) or epoetin alfa (450-1050 IU/kg body weight, subcutaneously, once a week; maximum total dose 80 000 IU) for at least 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was red blood cell transfusion independence lasting at least 12 weeks with a concurrent mean haemoglobin increase of at least 1·5 g/dL (weeks 1-24), evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. The safety population included all patients who received at least one dose of treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03682536; active, not recruiting). FINDINGS: Between Jan 2, 2019, and Sept 29, 2022, 363 patients were screened and randomly allocated: 182 (50%) to luspatercept and 181 (50%) to epoetin alfa. Median age was 74 years (IQR 69-80), 162 (45%) patients were female, and 201 (55%) were male. 289 (80%) were White, 44 (12%) were Asian, and two (1%) were Black or African American. 23 (6%) were Hispanic or Latino and 311 (86%) were not Hispanic or Latino. Median follow-up for the primary endpoint was 17·2 months (10·4-27·7) for the luspatercept group and 16·9 months (10·1-26·6) for the epoetin alfa group. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the luspatercept group reached the primary endpoint (110 [60%] vs 63 [35%]; common risk difference on response rate 25·4% [95% CI 15·8-35·0]; p<0·0001). Median follow-up for safety analyses was 21·4 months (IQR 14·2-32·4) for the luspatercept group and 20·3 months (12·7-30·9) for the epoetin alfa group. Common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurring among luspatercept recipients (n=182) were hypertension (19 [10%] patients), anaemia (18 [10%]), pneumonia (ten [5%]), syncope (ten [5%]), neutropenia (nine [5%]), thrombocytopenia (eight [4%]), dyspnoea (eight [4%]), and myelodysplastic syndromes (six [3%]); and among epoetin alfa recipients (n=179) were anaemia (14 [8%]), pneumonia (14 [8%]), neutropenia (11 [6%]), myelodysplastic syndromes (ten [6%]), hypertension (eight [4%]), iron overload (seven [4%]), and COVID-19 pneumonia (six [3%]). The most common serious treatment-emergent adverse events in both groups were pneumonia (nine [5%] luspatercept recipients and 13 [7%] epoetin alfa recipients) and COVID-19 (eight [4%] luspatercept recipients and ten [6%] epoetin alfa recipients). One death (due to acute myeloid leukaemia) considered to be luspatercept-related was reported at the interim analysis. INTERPRETATION: Luspatercept represents a new standard of care for ESA-naive patients with transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Significantly more patients had red blood cell transfusion independence and haematological improvement with luspatercept than with epoetin alfa, with benefits observed across patient subgroups. FUNDING: Celgene and Acceleron Pharma.

Nogapendekin alfa Inbakicept: First Approval.

Nogapendekin alfa inbakicept (ANKTIVA®; nogapendekin alfa inbakicept-pmln) is a recombinant interleukin-15 (IL-15) superagonist protein complex being developed by Altor BioScience, LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of ImmunityBio, Inc., for the treatment of solid and haematological cancers and HIV infection. In April 2024, nogapendekin alfa inbakicept was approved for use with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for the treatment of adult patients with BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with carcinoma in situ (CIS) with or without papillary tumours in the USA. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of nogapendekin alfa inbakicept leading to this first approval for the treatment of cancer.

[The immunocytokine FAP-IL2v : a potent co-therapy for preventing resistance to trastuzumab in HER2+ breast cancer]. / L'immunocytokine FAP-IL2v: Un co-traitement efficace pour pallier la résistance au trastuzumab du cancer du sein HER2.

Title: L'immunocytokine FAP-IL2v: Un co-traitement efficace pour pallier la résistance au trastuzumab du cancer du sein HER2. Abstract: Dans le cadre de leur module d'analyse scientifique, des étudiants des promotions 2022-2023 et 2023-2024 des Master 2 « Immunologie Translationnelle et Biothérapies ¼ (ITB) et « Immunologie Intégrative et Systémique ¼ (I2S) (Mention Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Parcours Immunologie, Sorbonne Université) se sont penchés sur la littérature et ont pris la plume pour partager avec les lecteurs de m/s quelques-uns des faits marquants de l'actualité en immunologie. Voici une sélection de quelques-unes de ces nouvelles, illustrant la large palette des axes de recherche en cours sur les mécanismes physiopathologiques des maladies infectieuses, auto-immunes, inflammatoires et tumorales et sur le développement d'immunothérapies pour le traitement de ces pathologies. On y découvre ainsi de nouvelles avancées sur l'analyse transcriptomique du microenvironnement inflammatoire de pathologies autoimmunes, sur des aspects mécanistiques impliqués dans la survie des cellules cancéreuses et la réponse immunitaire anti-tumorale des cellules NK, l'interconnexion entre le système immunitaire et le système nerveux périphérique, le développement de nouvelles immunothérapies permettant de cibler préférentiellement le microenvironnement tumoral et la prise en charge des effets secondaires autoimmuns cardiaques induits par les immunothérapies. Toute l'équipe pédagogique remercie également chaleureusement les différents tuteurs, experts dans le domaine en lien avec les nouvelles, qui ont accompagné avec bienveillance et enthousiasme le travail de nos étudiants !

Influence of Dulaglutide on Serum Biomarkers of Atherosclerotic Plaque Instability: An Interventional Analysis of Cytokine Profiles in Diabetic Subjects-A Pilot Study.

Background and Objectives: The rise in global diabetes cases, reaching a staggering 529 million in 2021 from 108 million in 1980, underscores the urgency of addressing its complications, notably macrovascular ones like coronary artery, cerebrovascular, and peripheral artery diseases, which contribute to over 50% of diabetes mortality. Atherosclerosis, linked to hyperglycemia-induced endothelial dysfunction, is pivotal in cardiovascular disease development. Cytokines, including pentraxin 3 (PTX3), copeptin, lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), influence atherosclerosis progression and plaque vulnerability. Inhibiting atherosclerosis progression is crucial, especially in diabetic individuals. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), increasingly used for type 2 diabetes, show promise in reducing the cardiovascular risk, sparking interest in their effects on atherogenesis. This study sought to examine the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) on biomarkers that indicate the instability of atherosclerotic plaques. These biomarkers include pentraxin 3 (PTX3), copeptin (CPC), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. Materials and Methods: A total of 34 participants, ranging in age from 41 to 81 years (with an average age of 61), who had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (with a median HbA1c level of 8.8%), dyslipidemia, and verified atherosclerosis using B-mode ultrasonography, were included in the study. All subjects were eligible to initiate treatment with a GLP-1 RA-dulaglutide. Results: Significant reductions in anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, fasting glucose levels, and HbA1c levels were observed posttreatment. Moreover, a notable decrease in biochemical markers associated with atherosclerotic plaque instability, particularly PTX3 and MMP-9 (p < 0.001), as well as Lp(a) (p < 0.05), was evident following the GLP-1 RA intervention. Conclusions: These findings underscore the potential of GLP-1 RAs in mitigating atherosclerosis progression and plaque vulnerability, thus enhancing cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor biosimilars for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

RATIONALE: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a progressive eye disease characterized by choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and is a leading cause of vision loss and disability worldwide. Although intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is an effective treatment option that helps to prevent vision loss or to improve visual acuity in people with neovascular AMD, treatment imposes a significant financial burden on patients and healthcare systems. A biosimilar is a biological product that has been developed to be nearly identical to a previously approved biological product. The use of biosimilars may help reduce costs and so may increase patient access to effective biologic medicines with similar levels of safety to the drugs on which they are based. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of anti-VEGF biosimilar agents compared with their corresponding anti-VEGF agents (i.e. the reference products) that have obtained regulatory approval for intravitreal injections in people with neovascular AMD. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and two trials registries together with reference checking and contact with study authors to identify studies that are included in the review. The latest search date was 2 June 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared approved anti-VEGF biosimilars with their reference products for treating the eyes of adult participants (≥ 50 years) who had an active primary or recurrent choroidal neovascularization lesion secondary to neovascular AMD. OUTCOMES: Our outcomes were: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), vision-related quality of life, serious ocular and non-ocular adverse events (AE), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), and serum concentrations of biosimilars and reference drugs. RISK OF BIAS: We assessed the risk of bias (RoB) for seven outcomes reported in a summary of findings table by using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. SYNTHESIS METHODS: We synthesized results for each outcome using meta-analysis, where possible, by calculating risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and continuous outcomes, respectively. Where this was not possible due to the nature of the data, we summarized the results narratively. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for prespecified outcomes. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included nine parallel-group multi-center RCTs that enrolled a total of 3814 participants (3814 participating eyes), with sample sizes that ranged from 160 to 705 participants per study. The mean age of the participants in these studies ranged from 67 to 76 years, and the proportion of women ranged from 26.5% to 58.7%. Ranibizumab (Lucentis) was the reference product in seven studies, and aflibercept (Eyelea) was the reference product in two others. All the included studies had been supported by industry. The follow-up periods ranged from 12 to 52 weeks (median 48 weeks). Five studies (56%) were conducted in multi-country settings across Europe, North America and Asia, two studies in India, and one each in Japan and the Republic of Korea. We judged all the included studies to have met high methodological standards. SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS: With regard to efficacy, our meta-analyses demonstrated that anti-VEGF biosimilars for neovascular AMD resulted in little to no difference compared with the reference products for BCVA change at 8 to 12 weeks (MD -0.55 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters, 95% CI -1.17 to 0.07; 8 studies, 3603 participants; high-certainty evidence) and the proportion of participants who lost fewer than 15 letters in BCVA at 24 to 48 weeks (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.01; 7 studies, 2658 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Almost all participants (96.6% in the biosimilar group and 97.0% in the reference product group) lost fewer than 15 letters in BCVA. The evidence from two studies suggested that there was no evidence of difference between biosimilars and reference products in vision-related quality of life measured by the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) summary scores at 24 to 48 weeks (MD 0.82, 95% CI -0.70 to 2.35; 2 studies, 894 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). With regard to the safety profile, meta-analyses also revealed little to no difference between anti-VEGF biosimilars and the reference products for the proportion of participants who experienced serious ocular AEs (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.26; 7 studies, 3292 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and for TEAEs leading to investigational product discontinuation or death (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.46; 8 studies, 3497 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Overall, 1.4% of participants in the biosimilar group and 1.2% in the reference product group experienced serious ocular adverse events. The most frequently documented serious ocular AEs were retinal hemorrhage and endophthalmitis. Although the evidence is of low certainty due to imprecision, meta-analysis suggested that anti-VEGF biosimilars led to no difference compared with the reference products for cumulative incidence of ADAs (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.22; 8 studies, 3066 participants; low-certainty evidence) or mean maximum serum concentrations (MD 0.42 ng/mL, 95% CI -0.22 to 1.05; subgroup of 3 studies, 100 participants; low-certainty evidence). We judged the overall risk of bias to be low for all studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In our review, low to high certainty evidence suggests that there is little to no difference, to date, between the anti-VEGF biosimilars approved for treating neovascular AMD and their reference products in terms of benefits and harms. While anti-VEGF biosimilars may be a viable alternative to reference products, current evidence for their use is based on a limited number of studies - particularly for comparison with aflibercept - with sparse long-term safety data, and infrequent assessment of quality of life outcomes. Our effect estimates and conclusions may be modified once findings have been reported from studies that are currently ongoing, and studies of biosimilar agents that are currently in development. FUNDING: Cochrane Eyes and Vision US Project is supported by grant UG1EY020522, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health. Takeshi Hasegawa and Hisashi Noma were supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant numbers: 22H03554, 19K03092, 24K06239). REGISTRATION: Protocol available via doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015804.

Switch to faricimab after initial treatment with aflibercept in eyes with diabetic macular edema.

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of a switch to faricimab in individuals affected by DME and previously treated with aflibercept. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, DME patients previously treated with at least 3 injections of aflibercept then switched to faricimab were enrolled. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST) were recorded at baseline, at the time of the switch and at 6 months follow-up. At transition to faricimab, patients were categorized as "good visual responders" (≥ 5 letters from baseline) or "poor visual responders" (< 5 letters), and as "good anatomical responders" (any reduction in edema compared to baseline) or "poor anatomical responders" (no reduction or worsening of edema). Changes in BCVA and CST were recorded at 6 months after the switch to faricimab. RESULTS: 100 eyes of 100 patients (61 female, 61%) were switched to faricimab after a mean of 6.8 ± 3.3 aflibercept injections. At the 6 months follow-up, only "poor visual responders" (N = 62) demonstrated a meaningful increase in BCVA (Δswitch-6M = + 5 letters; P = 0.007), coupled with a reduction in CST (Δswitch-6M = - 67.9 µm; P = 0.004); participants with "poor anatomical response" upon transitioning exhibited a significant functional gain (Δswitch-6M = + 4.5 letters; p = 0.05) but limited CST enhancements (Δswitch-6M = - 95.1 µm; p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Faricimab shows a positive impact on anatomical and functional metrics in DME cases refractory to aflibercept.