Optimal Sequence for Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: An Evidence-Based Review.

INTRODUCTION: Historically, multimodal therapeutic strategies involving preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) have been employed to treat locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) is showing promise in improving outcomes. Despite its benefits, the optimal sequencing within TNT-whether induction chemotherapy should precede or follow chemoradiotherapy-remains a critical question. This study endeavors to explore the effects of different TNT sequencing strategies on patient outcomes, including tumor downstaging, pathological response, organ preservation, and the balance between efficacy and tolerability. METHODS: Our methodology entailed a comprehensive literature review conducted on Medline, focusing on recent research, including retrospective studies, systematic reviews, and clinical trials. The review emphasized the comparison of induction chemotherapy versus consolidation chemotherapy within TNT regimens, assessing outcomes such as pathological response, organ preservation rates, and adverse effects. To ensure the selection of appropriate and high-quality studies, specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. RESULTS: The analysis revealed that induction chemotherapy might lead to decreased adherence to subsequent chemoradiotherapy while offering an early intervention against micrometastasis and potentially improving overall chemotherapy compliance. Conversely, consolidation chemotherapy has been associated with higher pathological complete response (pCR) rates and improved tolerability, indicating its potential for patients requiring local symptom relief or those eligible for a nonoperative management approach. Comparative studies like CAO/ARO/AIO-12 and the OPRA trials have significantly contributed to our understanding, suggesting that while both strategies have distinct advantages, the choice between induction and consolidation chemotherapy should be tailored based on individual patient profiles and tumor characteristics. CONCLUSION: This narrative review underscores the importance of a nuanced approach to TNT sequencing in locally advanced rectal cancer, highlighting the need for further research to refine treatment strategies.

Are measurable residual disease results after consolidation therapy useful in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia?

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is regularly tested at later timepoints after the end of first consolidation (EOC) in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The question remains whether this is useful for detecting (molecular) relapse. We investigated the clinical relevance of MRD after EOC in intermediate risk patients treated on DCOG-ALL-10 (n = 271) and DCOG-ALL-9 (n = 122), with MRD <0.05% at EOC. EOC MRD-negative patients (n = 178) had excellent outcomes, irrespective of MRD results at later timepoints; 6-year cumulative incidence of relapse (6-y CIR) of 7.4% (95% CI, 3.9%-12.3%) for those with MRD negativity at all later timepoints compared to 3.8% (95% CI, 0.3%-16.8%) for those with one or more later timepoints being positive (p = 0.51). Patients with positive EOC MRD (n = 91) of whom the subsequent timepoints were MRD negative (n = 43), had comparable good outcomes, 6-y CIR of 7.0% (95% CI, 1.8%-17.2%). In contrast, patients being MRD positive at EOC and MRD positive at one or more subsequent timepoints (n = 48) had a higher risk of relapse, 6-y CIR 29.4% (95% CI, 17.2%-42.8%), p < 0.001. These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort of ALL-9 as well as using the updated EuroMRD guidelines. In EOC MRD-negative patients, subsequent MRD measurements can be abandoned. For EOC MRD-positive patients the subsequent MRD measurement might be informative for further risk stratification.

Ixazomib as consolidation and maintenance versus observation in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma eligible for salvage autologous stem-cell transplantation (Myeloma XII [ACCoRD]): interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of consolidation and maintenance in the context of salvage autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) for relapsed multiple myeloma remains unclear. We aimed to assess whether consolidation after salvage autologous HSCT, using ixazomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone, followed by maintenance with single agent ixazomib is superior to observation. METHODS: This is an interim analysis of Myeloma XII (ACCorD; referred to as ACCorD hereafter), an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial done at 79 hospitals in the UK. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had relapsed multiple myeloma with measurable disease, an ECOG performance status of 2 or less with adequate renal, hepatobiliary, pulmonary, and cardiac function, and required treatment for first progressive disease occurring at least 12 months after first autologous HSCT. In a first randomisation, patients were assigned (1:1) to receive either conventional autologous HSCT with melphalan or augmented autologous HSCT with melphalan and ixazomib. In the second randomisation, reported here, patients were assigned (1:1) to consolidation using ixazomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (oral ixazomib 4 mg per day on days 1, 8, and 15, oral thalidomide 100 mg per day on days 1-28, and oral dexamethasone 40 mg per day on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of 28-day cycles), followed by maintenance with single agent ixazomib (oral ixazomib 4 mg per day on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles until disease progression or intolerance), or observation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, analysed by intention-to-treat. Safety was analysed per-protocol. This study is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN10038996, and EudraCT, 2016-000905-35, and recruitment is complete. FINDINGS: Between Dec 12, 2017, and April 21, 2023, 206 patients entered the second randomisation (103 in the consolidation and maintenance group and 103 in the observation group). This prespecified interim analysis (data cutoff April 21, 2023), was done at a median follow-up of 27 months (IQR 13-38). Median progression-free survival was 20 months (95% CI 15-29) in the consolidation and maintenance group and 13 months (11-18) in the observation group (hazard ratio 0·55 [95% CI 0·39-0·78]; p=0·0006). Serious adverse events were reported in 29 (32%) of 92 patients in the consolidation and maintenance group compared with seven (7%) of 103 patients in the observation group. The most common serious adverse events were infections and infestations in both the consolidation and maintenance group and the observation group. The most common grade 3, 4, or 5 adverse events for patients in the consolidation and maintenance group were upper respiratory infection (seven [8%] of 92 patients). No deaths in the consolidation and maintenance group were deemed treatment related. INTERPRETATION: ACCorD provides evidence that an orally administered, deliverable, and tolerable post-salvage autologous HSCT treatment regimen can improve the durability of response for transplantation-eligible patients at first relapse. The findings are of relevance to patients who had durable disease control from autologous HSCT in the first line, representing a viable alternative to continuous parentally-administered relapse therapies. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, Takeda Oncology.

Chemoradiotherapy plus induction or consolidation chemotherapy as total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Pooled analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 and the OPRA randomized phase 2 trials.

BACKGROUND: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has been used for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The optimal sequence of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and chemotherapy (CT) is a matter of debate. METHODS: We performed a pooled analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 and OPRA multicenter, randomized phase 2 trials to identify patient subsets that could benefit from one TNT sequence over the other regarding disease-free survival (DFS). Patients with stage II/III rectal cancer were randomized to CRT (50.4-54 Gy) with either induction (INCT-CRT) or consolidation CT (CRT-CNCT) with fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (CAO/ARO/AIO-12 and OPRA) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (OPRA) followed by mandatory total mesorectal excision (TME) (CAO/ARO/AIO-12) or selective watch-and-wait surveillance (OPRA). 311 and 324 patients were recruited from June 15, 2015 to January 31, 2018; and from April 12, 2014 to March 30, 2020 in the two trials, respectively. Pretreatment clinical and tumor characteristics included were age, sex, ECOG, cT-category, cN-category, clinical UICC stage, location from anal verge, and tumor grade. FINDINGS: In total, 628 eligible patients were included in the pooled analysis (CAO/ARO/AIO-12, n = 304; OPRA, n = 324). Of those, 313 were randomly assigned to the INCT-CRT group, and 315 to the CRT-CNCT group. Median follow-up was 43 months (IQR, 35-49) months in the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial and 61,2 months (IQR, 42-68,4) in the OPRA trial. Pooled analysis of baseline clinical and tumor characteristics did not identify any subgroups of patients that would benefit by the one TNT sequence over the other with regard to DFS. INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this is the first pooled analysis of two randomized trials after direct head-to-head comparison of both TNT sequences. Both trials reported higher rates of complete response with CRT-CNCT, and this should be considered the preferred TNT sequence if organ preservation is a priority.

Decitabine consolidation after CD19/CD22 CAR-T therapy as a novel maintenance treatment significantly improves survival outcomes in relapsed/refractory B-ALL patients.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of decitabine consolidation after treatment with CD19/CD22 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) for patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (r/r B-ALL). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 48 patients with r/r B-ALL who received CD19/CD22 CAR-T therapy between September 2017 and May 2021. Sixteen patients received decitabine consolidation (20 mg/m2/day for 5 days at 3-month intervals) after CAR-T therapy (DAC group), while 32 patients did not receive decitabine consolidation (CON group). Overall survival (OS), leukaemia-free survival (LFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) were evaluated in both groups. Time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The median follow-up periods in the DAC and CON groups were 41.2 months and 28.6 months, respectively. The 4-year OS and 4-year LFS rates in both groups were 93.3 % and 64.3 % (P=0.029) and 87.5 % and 55.9 % (P=0.059), respectively. The 1-year CIR was 6.25 % and 28.6 %, respectively. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that decitabine consolidation after CAR-T therapy was significantly associated with superior OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.121, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.015-0.947, P=0.044), and bridging to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation after CAR-T therapy was significantly associated with superior LFS (HR: 0.279, 95 %CI: 0.093-0.840, P=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Our study recommends decitabine consolidation after CD19/CD22 CAR-T therapy as a novel maintenance strategy to improve the survival outcomes of patients with r/r B-ALL.

The significance of consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized controlled phase III clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: This study explored the significance of consolidation maintenance chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy with different regimens in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHOD: A prospective randomized controlled phase III clinical trial was designed and registered in the China Clinical Trials Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR-TRC-12002719). Survival data were analyzed in terms of intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) sets for patients undergoing cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF) (group A), or cisplatin and paclitaxel (TP) (group B). RESULTS: The incidence risk of grade III-IV leukopenia in group B was higher than in group A (49.2% vs. 25.5%, p = 0.012). The survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 83.8%, 62.6%, 53.1%, and 41.3%, respectively. Consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation therapy had no benefit on median progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.95) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.809). According to the ITT analysis, the median PFS in group A and group B was 28.6 months and 30.3 months (X2 = 0.242, p = 0.623), while the median OS was 31.0 months and 50.3 months (X2 = 1.25，p = 0.263). For the PP analysis, the median PFS in group A and group B were 28.6 months and 30.3 months (p = 0.584), while the median OS was 31.0 months and 50.3 months (p = 0.259), respectively. Patients receiving consolidation chemotherapy did not show significant OS benefits (46.9 months vs. 38.3 months; X2 = 0.059, p = 0.866). CONCLUSION: Similar PFS and OS were found between PF and TP regimens with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Consolidation chemotherapy did not show any significant OS benefits.

Cost-effectiveness of blinatumomab for the treatment of B­precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia pediatric patients with high­risk first­relapse in Mexico.

BACKGROUND: Blinatumomab is a CD3/CD19-directed bispecific T-cell engager molecule that engages T cells to lyse CD19-expressing B cells. Based on a multicenter, open-label, phase 3, randomized clinical trial (Clinical Trials ID: NCT02393859), we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of blinatumomab compared to standard consolidation chemotherapy (SC) for the treatment of pediatric patients with high-risk first-relapsed Philadelphia chromosome-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) from a Mexico healthcare payer perspective. METHODS: A decision-analytic model, a partitioned survival model, was used to estimate the life-years (LYs) and costs over a lifetime horizon. We assumed that patients who remained alive beyond a 5-year period were cured. To account for the lingering impacts of cancer treatment, an excess mortality rate was incorporated into the model. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by fitting mixture-cure and standard parametric survival distributions to the time-to-event data from the phase 3 trial. The model accounted for treatment costs, adverse event costs, follow-up costs, subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) costs, and subsequent treatment costs. RESULTS: Blinatumomab was associated with a lifetime gained of 5.11 years at an incremental cost of $621,111 MXN, relative to SC. The ICER for blinatumomab vs Standard of care was estimated to be $121,526 MXN/LY gained in the base case. Cost-effectiveness was sensitive to varying the time horizon. Blinatumomab had a probability of 99 % of being cost-effective, relative to SC, at the willingness to pay threshold defined in Mexico. LIMITATIONS: Health-related quality of life values were not included in the analysis and therefore we did not estimate the quality-adjusted life-years gained. CONCLUSIONS: Blinatumomab was associated with greater benefit in terms of OS and EFS relative to SC. Probabilistic, deterministic, and scenario analyses indicate that blinatumomab represents the best value for money. Therefore, blinatumomab administered as part of consolidation therapy in B-ALL pediatric patients with high-risk first relapse is a cost-effective option.

The impact of immune recovery and treatment duration on disseminated histoplasmosis consolidation therapy in AIDS patients.

INTRODUCTION: The present study investigated the impact of immune recovery and the duration of antifungal adherence in the consolidation phase of disseminated histoplasmosis (DH) in acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients living in a hyperendemic area in northeastern Brazil. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with DH/AIDS, admitted to the São José Hospital between 2010 and 2015, who continued histoplasmosis consolidation therapy at the outpatient clinic were studied. The follow-up duration was at least 24 months. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients used itraconazole 200-400 mg/day or amphotericin B deoxycholate weekly during the consolidation phase, and six patients relapsed during follow-up. The overall median duration of consolidation antifungal use was 250 days [IQR 101 - 372]. Antifungal withdrawal by medical decision occurred in 41 patients (70.7 %) after a median of 293 days [IQR 128 - 372] of use; 16 patients discontinued by their own decision, with a median of 106 days [IQR 37 - 244] of therapy; three patients had no information available, and nine continued on AF therapy. The median CD4+ T-cell count in the group without relapse was 248 cells/µL [IQR 115-355] within 6 months after admission; conversely, in the relapse group, the median cell count remained below 100 cells/µL. Irregular adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was the leading risk factor associated with relapse and death (p< 0.01). DISCUSSION: The regular use of HAART, combined with immune recovery, proved to be highly effective in preventing relapses in DH/AIDS patients, suggesting that long-term antifungal therapy may not be necessary.

Budget impact analysis of durvalumab consolidation therapy vs no consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer in the context of the Chilean health care system.

BACKGROUND: Durvalumab, used as consolidation immunotherapy, has shown to improve survival in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer who respond to chemoradiotherapy, based on the most recent follow-up of PACIFIC. The Chilean healthcare system provides access to certain immunotherapies for this condition. The present study sought to estimate the budget impact of durvalumab versus standard of care in the context of the Chilean healthcare system. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A partitioned survival model was adapted to compare two strategies: durvalumab as consolidation therapy and standard of care for treating stage III NSCLC. The number of patients eligible for treatment was estimated using published incidence data and modeled for a 5-year time horizon. Model inputs were based on published literature, and the duration of treatment was estimated using survival curves obtained from PACIFIC. Costs were estimated in Chilean pesos (CLP) and converted to USD dollars using an exchange rate of USD 1 = CLP 827. Scenario analyses were performed to assess different subsequent therapy splits, variations in the target population and dosage of durvalumab. RESULTS: Durvalumab uptake projected total costs ranging from USD 1.27 in Year 1 to 8.5 million in Year 5 from the public perspective. From the private perspective, the budget impact for the first year is USD 1.3 million to USD 3 million for 2028. This difference relies mostly on the lower number of patients treated. Both perspectives anticipated cost savings over the time horizon through reduced monitoring, adverse events, and end-of-life expenses. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the inclusion of Durvalumab for NSCLC in Chile represents an investment in the Chilean health system. The incremental costs align with clinical benefits and potential savings in healthcare resource utilization. However, a comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis is needed to evaluate its economic value thoroughly.

Response-adapted consolidation therapy strategy for patients with metastatic high-risk neuroblastoma: Results of the SMC NB-2014 study.

BACKGROUND: Tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDCT/auto-SCT) and incorporation of 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG) treatment have shown positive outcomes in high-risk neuroblastoma. However, more optimized treatment strategies are still needed. PROCEDURE: The NB-2014 study was a nonrandomized, prospective trial that examined survival outcomes in metastatic high-risk neuroblastoma patients using response-adapted consolidation therapy. We used post-induction residual 123I-MIBG status at metastatic sites as a treatment response marker. Patients achieving complete resolution of MIBG uptake at metastatic sites underwent a reduced first HDCT/auto-SCT with a 20% dose reduction in HDCT. After the first HDCT/auto-SCT, patients with remaining MIBG uptake received dose-escalated (18 mCi/kg) 131I-MIBG treatment. In contrast, those with complete resolution of MIBG at metastatic sites received a standard dose (12 mCi/kg) of 131I-MIBG. We compared survival and toxicity outcomes with a historical control group from the NB-2009. RESULTS: Of 65 patients treated, 63% achieved complete resolution of MIBG uptake at metastatic sites following induction chemotherapy, while 29% of patients still had MIBG uptake at metastatic sites after the first HDCT/auto-SCT. The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 68.2% ± 6.0% and 86.5% ± 4.5%, respectively. Compared to NB-2009, EFS was similar (p = .855); however, NB-2014 had a higher OS (p = .031), a lower cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality (p = .036), and fewer acute and late toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that response-adaptive consolidation therapy based on chemotherapy response at metastatic sites facilitates better treatment tailoring, and appears promising for patients with metastatic high-risk neuroblastoma.

High-dose cytarabine plus gemtuzumab ozogamicin as consolidation therapy in patients with favorable- or intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia.

Previous prospective randomized trials have investigated the efficacy of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in the frontline treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We evaluated the efficacy of high-dose cytarabine with GO as consolidation therapy in 20 patients with favorable- or intermediate-risk AML in first complete remission. They included six patients with wild-type nucleophosmin (NPM1) core binding factor (CBF), ten with NPM1-mutated non-CBF, and four with wild-type NPM1 non-CBF. The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 62.0 months. The three-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 72.2% and 77.8%, respectively. OS and RFS were significantly higher for NPM1-mutated non-CBF AML than for wild-type NPM1 non-CBF AML (p = 0.001). We also examined the CD33 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs12459419, which has been reported to influence the therapeutic efficacy of GO and CD33 expression. The CD33 expression ratio was higher in CD33 SNP C/C than in C/T (83.1% vs. 49.8%, p = 0.035), but 3-year OS and RFS did not differ significantly. These results suggest that consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine plus GO is highly effective in transplant-ineligible elderly patients and may be a reasonable treatment, especially for NPM1-mutated AML.

Brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and prednisone followed by brentuximab vedotin consolidation in CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: CD30 expression is universal in anaplastic large-cell lymphoma and is expressed in some other peripheral T-cell lymphoma subtypes. Incorporation of brentuximab vedotin into initial therapy for people with CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas prolonged progression-free survival, but there is room for improvement, especially for people with non-anaplastic large-cell lymphoma subtypes. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, international, single-arm, phase 2 trial to evaluate the safety and activity of CHEP-BV (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone, brentuximab vedotin, and etoposide) followed by brentuximab vedotin consolidation in patients with CD30-expressing peripheral T-cell lymphomas across five academic centres in the USA and Canada. Adults aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed, untreated CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0-2, and adequate organ function were eligible to receive six planned cycles of CHEP-BV (ie, 1·8 mg/kg brentuximab vedotin intravenously on day 1, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, etoposide 100 mg/m2 daily intravenously on days 1-3, and prednisone 100 mg daily orally on days 1-5) with prophylactic G-CSF. Patients who responded to the treatment could receive brentuximab vedotin consolidation for up to ten additional cycles either after autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) or directly after CHEP-BV. The primary endpoints were unacceptable toxicity during a 3-plus-3 safety lead-in in participants who received study treatment and completed the safety evaluation period (to confirm the recommended phase 2 dose of brentuximab vedotin in CHEP-BV) and the complete response rate after CHEP-BV induction therapy in participants who received study treatment and had response evaluation. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03113500), and this cohort completed the trial. The trial is ongoing with the enrolment of a new cohort. FINDINGS: 54 patients were screened for eligibility and 48 were eligible for the study. The participants (18 [38%] women and 30 [63%] men; 34 [71%] White, four [8%] Black, five [10%] Asian, ten [21%] Hispanic, and 37 [77%] non-Hispanic people) were recruited and enrolled between Dec 4, 2017, and June 14, 2021, and followed up until Aug 25, 2023, when the database was locked for analysis. 48 participants were evaluable for toxicity, and 47 were evaluable for response (one participant died from COVID-19 before response assessment). During the safety lead-in, one of six participants had an unacceptable toxicity (ie, platelet count <10 000 per mm3 in a participant with extensive bone marrow involvement), and the proposed phase 2 dose of 1·8 mg/kg brentuximab vedotin in CHEP-BV was confirmed. At completion of CHEP-BV, 37 of 47 participants had complete response, yielding a complete response rate of 79% (95% CI 64-89). The most common CHEP-BV-related toxicities of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (14 [29%] of 48), leukopenia (11 [23%]), anaemia (ten [21%]), febrile neutropenia (ten [21%]), lymphopenia (nine [19%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [19%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: In patients with mostly CD30-expressing peripheral T-cell lymphomas other than non-anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, CHEP-BV (with or without autologous HSCT) followed by brentuximab vedotin consolidation was safe and active. FUNDING: SeaGen, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Lymphoma Research Foundation, and the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health.

MDT-BRIDGE: Neoadjuvant Durvalumab Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Either Surgery and Adjuvant Durvalumab or Chemoradiotherapy and Consolidation Durvalumab in Resectable or Borderline-resectable Stage IIB-IIIB NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: In the AEGEAN trial, neoadjuvant durvalumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (D+CT) followed by adjuvant durvalumab, versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, significantly improved pathological complete response (pCR) rate and event-free survival (EFS) in patients with resectable NSCLC. In the PACIFIC trial, consolidation durvalumab significantly improved progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy. Strong pathological and clinical outcomes with chemoimmunotherapy have generated interest in its use to enable patients with borderline-resectable NSCLC to undergo surgery. Additionally, for patients initially deemed resectable but who later become unresectable/inoperable during neoadjuvant treatment, consolidation immunotherapy after chemoradiotherapy should be explored. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MDT-BRIDGE (NCT05925530) is a multicenter, phase II, non-randomized study in ∼140 patients with EGFR/ALK wild-type, stage IIB-IIIB (N2) NSCLC. Following baseline multidisciplinary team (MDT) assessment to determine resectable/borderline-resectable status, all patients receive 2 cycles of neoadjuvant D+CT every 3 weeks, followed by MDT reassessment of resectability. Patients deemed resectable receive 1-2 additional cycles of D+CT followed by surgery (Cohort 1). Patients deemed unresectable receive standard-of-care chemoradiotherapy (Cohort 2). Cohort 1 patients who become ineligible for surgery can enter Cohort 2. Following surgery or chemoradiotherapy, patients receive adjuvant or consolidation durvalumab for 1 year. The primary endpoint is resection rate in all patients. Additional endpoints include resection rates by baseline resectable/borderline-resectable status, resection outcomes, EFS/PFS, OS, pCR rate, circulating tumor DNA dynamics pre- and post-surgery (including correlation with clinical outcomes), and safety. CONCLUSION: Enrollment began in February 2024; primary completion is anticipated in April 2026.

Curative Strategy for High-Risk Smoldering Myeloma: Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (KRd) Followed by Transplant, KRd Consolidation, and Rd Maintenance.

PURPOSE: Early treatment of high-risk smoldering myeloma has been shown to delay progression to multiple myeloma (MM). We conducted this trial with curative intention using a treatment approach employed for newly diagnosed patients with MM. METHODS: Patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma (>50% progression risk at 2 years) and transplant candidates were included and received induction therapy with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd), six cycles, followed by high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m2) autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDM-ASCT), two KRd consolidation cycles, and Rd maintenance for 2 years. The primary end point was undetectable measurable residual disease (uMRD) rate by next-generation flow after ASCT. Sustained uMRD 4 years after ASCT was the secondary end point. RESULTS: Between June 2015 and June 2017, 90 patients were included, and 31% met at least one SixtyLightchain MRI (SLiM)-hypercalcemia, renal impairment, anemia, bone disease (CRAB) criterion. After a median follow-up of 70.1 months, 3 months after ASCT, in the intention-to-treat population, 56 (62%) of 90 patients had uMRD, and 4 years later, it was sustained in 29 patients (31%). Five patients progressed to MM, and the 70-month progression rate was 94% (95% CI, 84 to 89). The presence of any SLiM CRAB criteria predicted progression to MM (four of the five patients; hazard ratio, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.14 to 1.13; P = .03). Thirty-six patients showed biochemical progression, and failure to achieve uMRD at the end of treatment predicted it. The 70-month overall survival was 92% (95% CI, 82 to 89). Neutropenia and infections were the most frequent adverse events during treatment, resulting in one treatment-related death. Three second primary malignancies have been reported. CONCLUSION: Although a longer follow-up is needed, this curative approach is encouraging and more effective than active MM, with 31% of the patients maintaining the uMRD 4 years after HDM-ASCT.

Blinatumomab for MRD-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adults.

BACKGROUND: Many older adults with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) have a relapse despite having a measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission with combination chemotherapy. The addition of blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager molecule that is approved for the treatment of relapsed, refractory, and MRD-positive BCP-ALL, may have efficacy in patients with MRD-negative remission. METHODS: In a phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients 30 to 70 years of age with BCR::ABL1-negative BCP-ALL (with :: indicating fusion) who had MRD-negative remission (defined as <0.01% leukemic cells in bone marrow as assessed on flow cytometry) after induction and intensification chemotherapy to receive four cycles of blinatumomab in addition to four cycles of consolidation chemotherapy or to receive four cycles of consolidation chemotherapy alone. The primary end point was overall survival, and relapse-free survival was a secondary end point. RESULTS: The data and safety monitoring committee reviewed the results from the third efficacy interim analysis and recommended that they be reported. Complete remission with or without full count recovery was observed in 395 of 488 enrolled patients (81%). Of the 224 patients with MRD-negative status, 112 were assigned to each group. The characteristics of the patients were balanced between the groups. At a median follow-up of 43 months, an advantage was observed in the blinatumomab group as compared with the chemotherapy-only group with regard to overall survival (at 3 years: 85% vs. 68%; hazard ratio for death, 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.73; P = 0.002), and the 3-year relapse-free survival was 80% with blinatumomab and 64% with chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio for relapse or death, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.87). A higher incidence of neuropsychiatric events was reported in the blinatumomab group than in the chemotherapy-only group. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of blinatumomab to consolidation chemotherapy in adult patients in MRD-negative remission from BCP-ALL significantly improved overall survival. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; E1910 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02003222.).

Blinatumomab as postremission therapy replaces consolidation and substantial parts of maintenance chemotherapy and results in stable MRD negativity in children with newly diagnosed B-lineage ALL.

The bispecific T cell-binding antibody blinatumomab (CD19/CD3) is widely and successfully used for the treatment of children with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). Here, we report the efficacy of a single course of blinatumomab instead of consolidation chemotherapy to eliminate minimal residual disease (MRD) and maintain stable MRD-negativity in children with primary BCP-ALL.Between February 2020 and November 2022, 177 children with non-high-risk BCP-ALL were enrolled in the ALL-MB 2019 pilot study (NCT04723342). Patients received the usual risk-adapted induction therapy according to the ALL-MB 2015 protocol. Those who achieved a complete remission at the end of induction (EOI) received treatment with blinatumomab immediately after induction at a dose of 5 µg/m2/day for 7 days and 21 days at a dose of 15 µg/m2/day, followed by 12 months of maintenance therapy. MRD was measured using multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) at the EOI, then immediately after blinatumomab treatment, and then four times during maintenance therapy at 3-month intervals.All 177 patients successfully completed induction therapy and achieved a complete hematological remission. In 174 of these, MFC-MRD was measured at the EOI. 143 patients (82.2%) were MFC-MRD negative and the remaining 31 patients had varying degrees of MFC-MRD positivity.MFC-MRD was assessed in all 176 patients who completed the blinatumomab course. With one exception, all patients achieved MFC-MRD negativity after blinatumomab, regardless of the MFC-MRD score at EOI. One adolescent girl with high MFC-MRD positivity at EOI remained MFC-MRD positive. Of 175 patients who had completed 6 months of maintenance therapy, MFC-MRD data were available for 156 children. Of these, 155 (99.4%) were MFC-MRD negative. Only one boy with t(12;21) (p13;q22)/ETV6::RUNX1 became MFC-MRD positive again. The remaining 174 children had completed the entire therapy. MFC-MRD was examined in 154 of them, and 153 were MFC-MRD negative. A girl with hypodiploid BCP-ALL showed a reappearance of MFC-MRD with subsequent relapse.In summary, a single 28-day course of blinatumomab immediately after induction, followed by 12 months of maintenance therapy, is highly effective in achieving MRD-negativity in children with newly diagnosed non-high risk BCP-ALL and maintaining MRD-negative remission at least during the treatment period.

Twice-weekly induction with ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) combination followed by extended IRd consolidation and lenalidomide maintenance in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Results of the phase 2 study IFM2014-03.

Therapeutic strategies for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) have considerably improved during the last 10 years. The IFM2014-03 trial proposed an all-oral triplet induction/consolidation regimen in transplant-eligible NDMM patients, followed by lenalidomide maintenance. Induction consisted of three 21-day cycles of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd), before high-dose Melphalan with transplant followed by eight 28-day cycles of IRd consolidation before 13 cycles of lenalidomide maintenance. Forty-six patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of therapy, and 39 entered the maintenance phase. The primary end-point was stringent complete response after consolidation, and was achieved in nine patients (20.9%, 90% CI 11.4-33.7; p = 0.998). Ten patients (24.4%) had an undetectable minimal residual disease. The overall response rate was 95.7%. The 3-year progression-free survival was 66.3%. No unexpected toxicities were recorded, and only eight patients suspended from any study drug. Of note, 21 (45.7%) patients reported peripheral neuropathy (PN) (grades 1-2 with no serious adverse events). IRd induction and consolidation with transplant before lenalidomide maintenance shows lower response rates compared to other triplet therapies. It could be an alternative for patients who require an all-oral regimen and/or with pre-existent PN, especially if quadruplet regimens including anti-CD38 antibody are not available.