A propensity score-matched cost-effectiveness analysis of magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy versus craniotomy for brain tumor radiation necrosis.

OBJECTIVE: Radiation necrosis is becoming an increasingly prevalent complication in patients with brain tumors given the growing utility of stereotactic radiosurgery in modern treatment paradigms. Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a new minimally invasive modality that has exhibited an efficacy comparable to craniotomy in treating radiation necrosis. No studies to date have compared their cost-effectiveness despite the significant additional expenses associated with MRgLITT use. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of MRgLITT versus craniotomy in patients with comparable presentations of radiation necrosis. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried from 2011 to 2020 for patients with radiation necrosis and treated using craniotomy or MRgLITT. Admission charges and costs were inflation adjusted to 2020 $US. Surgical cohorts were propensity score-matched according to demographic, clinical, and admission characteristics. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses identified associations between type of intervention and outcomes. A semi-Markov model was created to simulate treatment with craniotomy versus MRgLITT. Cost, transition probabilities, and health state utilities were derived from the NIS, individual patient outcomes from multiple institutions, and prospectively collected quality-of-life data from a single institution and verified against other studies. Monte Carlo simulation and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness between the two modalities. RESULTS: In the designated study period, 2869 patients had been admitted with brain tumor radiation necrosis and were managed with neurosurgical intervention. After propensity score matching, MRgLITT, relative to craniotomy, was independently associated with a shorter length of stay (LOS; ß = -1.81, p = 0.002), lower odds of complications (OR 0.18, p = 0.033), and higher odds of home discharge (OR 3.05, p = 0.041), but there was no difference in total admission costs between the two modalities (ß = $6229, p = 0.081). On Monte Carlo simulation, patients treated with MRgLITT had a lower probability of disease (radiation necrosis or tumor) recurrence (13.5% vs 22.0%, p < 0.001) but an equivalent mortality risk (22.8% vs 22.3%, p = 0.429) compared to the patients treated with craniotomy at the 1-year follow-up. Over a 4-year time horizon, MRgLITT had an incremental cost of -$25,685 and incremental effectiveness of 0.14 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -$183,464 per QALY relative to craniotomy. CONCLUSIONS: MRgLITT was a more cost-effective treatment strategy than craniotomy in the management of patients with brain tumor radiation necrosis. The cost-effectiveness of MRgLITT may be attributed to a shorter LOS, lower complication odds, and higher home discharge odds in the immediate postoperative period and a lower risk of disease recurrence over the long-term follow-up.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus lenvatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a propensity matching score analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the survival benefit of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) versus lenvatinib as first-line therapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 147 HCC patients with PVTT were included in this retrospective study, 70 were treated with SBRT and 77 of were treated with lenvatinib. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was employed to balance the differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between the two groups. In addition, the safety of patients in both groups was also evaluated. RESULTS: After PSM, 38 patients were matched in each of the two groups. The median OS was 14.5 (95% CI: 10.1-18.9) and 11.1 (95% CI: 9.3-12.9) months in the SBRT and lenvatinib groups, respectively (P = 0.014). The median PFS was 6.8 (95% CI: 5.1-8.5) and 5.0 (95% CI: 3.0-7.0) months, respectively (P = 0.010). The 1-, 2-years OS rates in the two groups were 65.8% vs. 39.5% and 31.6% vs. 10.5%, respectively. The 6-, 12-months PFS rates in the two groups were 57.9% vs. 44.7% and 28.9% vs. 10.5%, respectively. In addition, the SBRT group had a better ORR than the lenvatinib group (52.6% vs. 23.7%, P = 0.009). Patients with good response to SBRT had better survival. Cox proportional hazard model showed that SBRT was an important prognostic factor for OS and PFS. The incidence of hypertension (34.2% vs. 0%) was higher in the LEN group, however, both treatment modalities were well tolerated in the two groups of patients. CONCLUSION: In HCC patients with PVTT, SBRT had a better survival benefit than Lenvatinib treatment as first-line therapy.

Role of Surgery in Vestibular Schwannoma following prior Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is widely used for treating vestibular schwannoma (VS), offering high tumour control rates, especially in small to medium-sized tumours. However, a subset of patients experiences SRS failure, requiring subsequent salvage microsurgery (MS). The primary reason for salvage surgery is continued tumour growth, but other causes include symptom progression and cystic enlargement. Salvage surgery is more challenging due to increased tumour adhesion to critical structures, resulting in higher complication rates, particularly for facial nerve preservation. Studies suggest subtotal resection may offer better outcomes than gross total resection in terms of facial nerve function, though treatment remains complex and outcomes vary.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy on abdominal-pelvic lymph node oligometastases: a systematic review on toxicity.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To review available data on toxicity during and/or after treatment of abdominal-pelvic lymph node oligometastases (A-P LN) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and to provide an overview of adverse events and its relation to dose or fractionation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For this systematic review, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and CINAH for studies published between the database inception and October 3rd, 2023. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients with 1-5 A-P LN oligometastases, (2) treatment with SBRT to a median prescribed dose of ≥55 Gy BED10, and (3) description of acute and/or late toxicity. There were no language or date restrictions. RESULTS: A total of 35 studies, including 1,512 patients, were selected. Late grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 0.6% and 0.1% of the patients treated for A-P LN oligometastases. All late adverse events grade ≥ 3 occurred after treatment of the tumor with a minimum BED10 of 72 Gy. Of the 11 patients with severe late toxicity, five patients were re-irradiated. Late grade 2 and 1 toxicity was reported in 3.4% and 8.3% of the patients. Acute toxicity grades 4, 3, 2, and 1 occurred in 0.1%, 0.2%, 4.4%, and 19.8% of the patients, respectively. INTERPRETATION: SBRT for A-P LN oligometastases show low toxicity rates. Nearly 50% of late adverse events ≥ grade 3 were associated with re-irradiation.

Diagnosis and management of brain radiation necrosis.

Brain radiation necrosis (BRN) is a significant and complex side effect of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Differentiating BRN from local tumor recurrence is critical, requiring advanced diagnostic techniques and a multidisciplinary approach. BRN typically manifests months to years post-treatment, presenting with radiological changes on MRI and may produce neurological symptoms. Key risk factors include the volume of irradiated brain tissue, the radiation dose, and prior radiotherapy history. This manuscript reviews the diagnostic process for BRN, emphasizing the importance of assessing baseline risk, clinical evaluation, and advanced imaging modalities. Multimodal imaging enhances diagnostic accuracy and aids in distinguishing BRN from tumor relapse. Therapeutic management varies based on symptoms. Asymptomatic BRN may be monitored with regular imaging, while symptomatic BRN often requires corticosteroids to reduce inflammation. Emerging therapies like bevacizumab have shown promise in clinical trials, with significant radiographic and symptomatic improvement. Surgical intervention may be necessary for histological confirmation and severe, treatment-resistant cases. Ongoing research aims to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy, enhancing patient outcomes and quality of life. This review underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach and continuous advancements to address the challenges posed by BRN in brain tumor patients.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with brainstem cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs): an international, multicentric study.

Brainstem cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM) are clinically more aggressive compared to superficial CCMs. Due to their location, resection can be challenging, making stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) an attractive alternative for symptomatic patient. Brainstem CCM patients (n = 170) were treated with Gamma Knife SRS at 11 radiosurgical centers. Hemorrhagic risk reduction, risk factors of post-SRS hemorrhage, and clinical outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Most patients had a single (165/170 patients) brainstem CCMs treated; the majority of CCMs (165/181) presented with bleeding. Single-session SRS decreased the risk of repeat hemorrhage in patients with hemorrhagic brainstem CCM (HR: 0.17, p < 0.001) using recurrent multivariate analysis. The annual hemorrhage rate decreased from 14.8 per 100 CCM-years before SRS to 2.3 after treatment. Using univariate Cox-analysis, the probability of a new hemorrhages after SRS was reduced for patient older than 35 years (HR = 0.21, p = 0.002) and increased with a margin dose > 13 Gy (HR = 2.57, p = 0.044). Adverse radiation effect (ARE) occurred in 9 patients (5.3%) and was symptomatic in four (2.4%). At a median follow-up of 3.4 years (Inter-quartile range: 5.4), 13 patients (8.0%) had a worsened clinical status, with the treated CCM being the cause in 5.6% (10) of the patients. Single-session SRS decreased the risk of repeat hemorrhage in patients with hemorrhagic brainstem CCM and conveyed this benefit with a low risk of advrse radiation effects (ARE) and worsening clinical status.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent/residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma: a single-arm systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are a significant subtype of pituitary tumors, accounting for 30% of all pituitary tumors and 10-20% of intracranial tumors. The primary treatment for NFPAs is resection, but complete resection is often challenging due to the tumor's proximity to critical structures, leading to frequent recurrences. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a viable treatment option for recurrent or residual NFPAs, but its long-term efficacy and safety profile require further investigation. METHODS: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and included studies published up to February 2024. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies evaluating SRS for recurrent/residual NFPAs. Inclusion criteria focused on studies reporting outcomes and complications of SRS, while exclusion criteria omitted case reports, case series, and non-English studies. Data extracted included demographic details, dosimetry parameters, and follow-up durations. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool, and statistical analyses were performed using single-arm meta-analyses. RESULTS: A total of 24 studies involving 3,781 patients were included. The mean follow-up duration was 60 months. Tumor control was achieved in approximately 92.3% of patients. The risk of developing hypopituitarism post-SRS was 13.62%, while the risk for panhypopituitarism was 2.55%. New visual field deficits occurred in 3.94% of patients. Cranial nerve deficits were rare, with event rates below 1% for CN III, CN V, and CN VI. CONCLUSION: SRS is effective in managing recurrent or residual NFPAs, achieving high tumor control rates. However, the risk of hypopituitarism remains a significant concern, necessitating regular endocrinological monitoring. While generally safe, the potential for new visual field deficits and other cranial nerve deficits must be considered. SRS remains a valuable treatment option, but clinicians should be aware of its potential complications.

Phase 3 Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Whether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is noninferior to conventionally or moderately hypofractionated regimens with respect to biochemical or clinical failure in patients with localized prostate cancer is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, international, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. Men with stage T1 or T2 prostate cancer, a Gleason score of 3+4 or less, and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of no more than 20 ng per milliliter were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive SBRT (36.25 Gy in 5 fractions over a period of 1 or 2 weeks) or control radiotherapy (78 Gy in 39 fractions over a period of 7.5 weeks or 62 Gy in 20 fractions over a period of 4 weeks). Androgen-deprivation therapy was not permitted. The primary end point was freedom from biochemical or clinical failure, with a critical hazard ratio for noninferiority of 1.45. The analysis was performed in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: A total of 874 patients underwent randomization at 38 centers (433 patients in the SBRT group and 441 in the control radiotherapy group) between August 2012 and January 2018. The median age of the patients was 69.8 years, and the median PSA level was 8.0 ng per milliliter; the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk category was low for 8.4% of the patients and intermediate for 91.6%. At a median follow-up of 74.0 months, the 5-year incidence of freedom from biochemical or clinical failure was 95.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.3 to 97.4) in the SBRT group and 94.6% (95% CI, 91.9 to 96.4) in the control radiotherapy group (unadjusted hazard ratio for biochemical or clinical failure, 0.73; 90% CI, 0.48 to 1.12; P = 0.004 for noninferiority), which indicated the noninferiority of SBRT. At 5 years, the cumulative incidence of late Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade 2 or higher genitourinary toxic effects was 26.9% (95% CI, 22.8 to 31.5) with SBRT and 18.3% (95% CI, 14.8 to 22.5) with control radiotherapy (P<0.001), and the cumulative incidence of late RTOG grade 2 or higher gastrointestinal toxic effects was 10.7% (95% CI, 8.1 to 14.2) and 10.2% (95% CI, 7.7 to 13.5), respectively (P = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Five-fraction SBRT was noninferior to control radiotherapy with respect to biochemical or clinical failure and may be an efficacious treatment option for patients with low-to-intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer as defined in this trial. (Funded by Accuray and others; PACE-B ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01584258.).

Dose escalation with stereotactic body radiotherapy for cervical cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND: Dose escalation with brachytherapy after pelvic irradiation is standard for treating cervical cancer. Its application can be impossible for some patients. Dose escalation with SBRT is widely used with high local control and acceptable toxicity rates in different body parts. The study enrolled patients who underwent SBRT treatment for dose escalation in the cervix. METHODS: Patients who were pathologically diagnosed and treated with cervical SBRT after definitive CRT were included in the study. A total of 30 Gy in 5 fractions for the high-risk volume was prescribed. The first response evaluation was performed three months after the completion of treatment. Treatment toxicity was documented according to the RTOG-EORTC scale. Oncological outcomes and toxicity were assessed. RESULTS: Between 02.2019 and 05.2023, 40 patients were treated with an SBRT boost after pelvic irradiation. The median follow-up time was 16 months (7-44 months). The median HR CTV was 47 cc (8,3-168,2 cc). There were 39 patients who achieved a complete response and one who achieved a partial response in the third month after treatment. There were two local or two regional recurrences. The 1-year metastasis-free survival was 88%, and the 1-year progression-free survival was 88%. During the follow-up period, one grade 3 gastrointestinal side effect was observed. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT which has low toxicity and reasonable locoregional control rates in a short follow-up period, may be an option for dose escalation in brachytherapy-ineligible cervical cancer patients.

Efficacy and safety of a third stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: an international, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN) is a debilitating facial pain disorder, often necessitating surgical interventions when medication proves insufficient. Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) is an established therapeutic option. Limited studies explored the feasibility of a third SRS procedure. Our study investigates the safety and efficacy of a third SRS procedure for recurrent TN. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis across multiple centers using databases collected prospectively. Pain status was evaluated utilizing the BNI Pain Intensity Scales. The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to estimate the time to recurrence, with group comparisons conducted using log-rank tests. Associations were explored using Chi-square and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Ten institutions contributed with a total of 35 patients. A third SRS revealed sustained effectiveness with a pain control rate of 82.7%. The median time to recurrence was 35.5 months. New sensory dysfunction following the third procedure occurred in 22% of patients who had preserved sensory function after the second procedure. When considering those who developed sensory dysfunction after the second procedure, 40% of the entire cohort was affected. There were no significant differences in pain recurrence intervals among the three procedures. A meta-analysis, combining data from previous studies, showed that 89.6% of patients achieved some degree of pain control after a third SRS, with 27.4% experiencing new sensory dysfunction and a median time to recurrence of 31.6 months. CONCLUSION: Our study, the largest on the topic, affirms the sustained effectiveness of a third SRS for TN, providing comparable pain relief to initial procedures. Notably, an extended pain-free interval after the third SRS session was observed. Facial sensory dysfunction emerged as the primary side effect. Larger studies are warranted to explore correlations with demographics and treatment parameters for a comprehensive understanding of repeat SRS in managing recurrent TN.

Reirradiation of bone metastasis: A narrative review of the literature.

Patients with bone metastasis are prevalent among those receiving palliative radiotherapy (RT), with approximately 20 % requiring reirradiation (reirradiation). The goal of bone reirradiation may be local control (oligoreoccurrence or oligoprogression of a previously treated lesion or in a previous treatment field) or symptomatic (threatening or painful progression). Published data on bone reirradiation indicate almost two-thirds of overall pain response. The primary organ at risk (especially for spine treatment) is the spinal cord. The risk of radiation myelitis is<1 % for cumulative doses of<50Gy. Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and stereotactic RT (SRT) appear to be safer than three-dimensional RT (3DRT), although randomized trials comparing these techniques in reirradiation are lacking. Reirradiation requires multidisciplinary assessment. Alternative treatments for bone metastases (surgery, interventional radiology, etc.) must be considered. Patients should have a performance status≤2, with at least a 1-month interval between treatments. The planning process involves reviewing previous RT plans, cautious dose adjustments, and precise target delineation and dose distribution to minimize toxicity. Cumulative dosimetry, patient consent, and vigilant post-treatment monitoring and dose reporting are crucial.

Reirradiation of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with external photons: A practical review of the literature.

The modalities of management by reirradiation for recurrence or a second localization of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in previously irradiated terrain is challenging due to the great heterogeneity of data in the literature, mainly retrospective data reporting non-negligible risks of serious late toxicity events. With the recent development of more precise and conformal radiotherapy techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT), the benefit-to-risk ratio of reirradiation has evolved in recent years with encouraging results, but patient selection is crucial. The aim of this review is to discuss the role of HNSCC reirradiation in terms of patient selection and external photon radiotherapy techniques for definitive tumor reirradiation and postoperative reirradiation.

Brachial plexopathy following stereotactic body radiation therapy in apical lung malignancies: A dosimetric pooled analysis of individual patient data.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to establish dosimetric constraints for the brachial plexus at risk of developing grade ≥ 2 brachial plexopathy in the context of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual patient data from 349 patients with 356 apical lung malignancies who underwent SBRT were extracted from 5 articles. The anatomical brachial plexus was delineated following the guidelines provided in the atlases developed by Hall, et al. and Kong, et al.. Patient characteristics, pertinent SBRT dosimetric parameters, and brachial plexopathy grades (according to CTCAE 4.0 or 5.0) were obtained. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models were used to estimate the risk of developing grade ≥ 2 brachial plexopathy through maximum likelihood parameter fitting. RESULTS: The prescription dose/fractionation schedules for SBRT ranged from 27 to 60 Gy in 1 to 8 fractions. During a follow-up period spanning from 6 to 113 months, 22 patients (6.3 %) developed grade ≥2 brachial plexopathy (4.3 % grade 2, 2.0 % grade 3); the median time to symptoms onset after SBRT was 8 months (ranged, 3-54 months). NTCP models estimated a 10 % risk of grade ≥2 brachial plexopathy with an anatomic brachial plexus maximum dose (Dmax) of 20.7 Gy, 34.2 Gy, and 42.7 Gy in one, three, and five fractions, respectively. Similarly, the NTCP model estimates the risks of grade ≥2 brachial plexopathy as 10 % for BED Dmax at 192.3 Gy and EQD2 Dmax at 115.4 Gy with an α/ß ratio of 3, respectively. Symptom persisted after treatment in nearly half of patients diagnosed with grade ≥2 brachial plexopathy (11/22, 50 %). CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes dosimetric constraints ranging from 20.7 to 42.7 Gy across 1-5 fractions, aimed at mitigating the risk of developing grade ≥2 brachial plexopathy following SBRT. These findings provide valuable guidance for future ablative SBRT in apical lung malignancies.

Local control and toxicity after stereotactic radiotherapy in brain metastases patients and the impact of novel systemic treatments.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Treatment modalities for patients with brain metastases consist of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic treatments such as immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Although much is known about local control of brain metastases after radiotherapy and surgery alone, more understanding is needed of the additional effect of new systemic treatments. Our study presents real-world data about the combined effects of different local and systemic treatment strategies on local response of irradiated brain metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective consecutive cohort study of patients that presented with brain metastases in our institution between June 2018 and May 2020, reporting the impact of radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy combined with systemic treatment on local control of irradiated brain metastases and toxicity. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy were temporarily discontinued around irradiation. RESULTS: 262 consecutively treated patients were included in the study. Median time to local failure of irradiated brain metastases was 18 months (IQR 9-34), median overall survival was 20 months (IQR 10-36). 211 (81 %) patients received systemic treatment. Patients with breast cancer had a worse local control (HR 2.3, 95 % CI 1.0-5.0, p = 0.038), as did patients without any systemic treatment (HR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.1-4.3, p = 0.034). Symptomatic radiation necrosis occurred in 36 (14 %) patients. A diameter > 2.5 cm was associated with a higher risk of radiation necrosis. No association was found between systemic treatment in combination with local radiotherapy and symptomatic radiation necrosis. CONCLUSION: Patients who received any form of systemic treatment had better local control after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. We did not find an association between systemic treatment and the incidence of radiation necrosis.

Bevacizumab reduces cerebral radiation necrosis due to stereotactic radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.

Background: Cerebral radiation necrosis (RN), a severe complication of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), has been shown to significantly decrease patient survival time and quality of life. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether bevacizumab can prevent or reduce the occurrence of SRT-induced cerebral RN in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of NSCLC patients with brain metastases from March 2013 to June 2023 who were treated with SRT. Patients were divided into two groups: those in the bevacizumab group received SRT with four cycles of bevacizumab, and patients in the control group received SRT only. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed based on a multinomial propensity score model to balance the baseline characteristics. The chi-square test was used. A Cox model was used to evaluate overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 80 patients were enrolled, namely, 28 patients in the bevacizumab group and 52 patients in the control group. The possibility of developing cerebral RN and/or symptomatic edema (RN/SE) was significantly decreased in patients treated with bevacizumab compared to those who did not receive bevacizumab before IPTW (p=0.036) and after IPTW (p=0.015) according to chi-square analysis. The IPTW-adjusted median OS was 47.7 months (95% CI 27.4-80.8) for patients in the bevacizumab group and 44.1 months (95% CI 36.7-68.0) (p=0.364) for patients in the control group. Conclusion: The application of bevacizumab concurrent with SRT may prevent or reduce the occurrence of cerebral RN in NSCLC patients with brain metastases.

Feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy on the future pancreatic neck transection margin to reduce the risk of pancreatic fistula after high-risk pancreatoduodenectomy (FIBROPANC): protocol for a multicentre, single-arm trial.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurs in 25% of patients undergoing a high-risk pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and is a driving cause of major morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospital stay and increased costs after PD. There is a need for perioperative methods to decrease these risks. In recent studies, preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) reduced the rate of POPF seemingly due to radiation-induced pancreatic fibrosis. However, patients with a high risk of POPF mostly have a non-pancreatic periampullary tumour and do not receive radiotherapy. Prospective studies using radiotherapy specifically to reduce the risk of POPF have not been performed. We aim to assess the safety, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy on the future pancreatic neck transection margin to reduce the rate of POPF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicentre, single-arm, phase II trial, we aim to assess the feasibility and safety of a single fraction of preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy (12 Gy) to a 4 cm area around the future pancreatic neck transection margin in patients at high risk of developing POPF after PD aimed to reduce the risk of grade B/C POPF. Adult patients scheduled for PD for malignant and premalignant periampullary tumours, excluding PDAC, with a pancreatic duct diameter ≤3 mm will be included in centres participating in the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. The primary outcome is the safety and feasibility of single-dose preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy before PD. The most relevant secondary outcomes are grade B/C POPF and the difference in the extent of fibrosis between the radiated and non-radiated (uncinate margin) pancreas. Evaluation of endpoints will be performed after inclusion of 33 eligible patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained by the Amsterdam UMC's accredited Medical Research Ethics Committee (METC). All included patients are required to have provided written informed consent. The results of this trial will be used to determine the need for a randomised controlled phase III trial and submitted to a high-impact peer-reviewed medical journal regardless of the study outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL72913 (Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects Registry) and NCT05641233 (ClinicalTrials).

The role of procedural factors on the outcomes of embolization followed by radiosurgery for the treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: systematic review and proportional meta-analyses.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal therapy for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVM) with embolization followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (E + SRS) has shown varying outcomes. Its benefits over other treatment modalities have been questioned. The goal of this systematic review was to determine the factors associated with cure and complication rates of this treatment strategy. METHODS: A literature search in Medline and Global Index Medicus, from inception to October 2023, was performed. Studies reporting relevant outcome data from bAVM patients treated with E + SRS were included. Data on several patient, lesion and procedure-related factors were collected. Embolization intent was classified as Targeted (of high-risk features), Devascularizing (feeder embolization/flow reduction) and Occluding (intent-to-cure, nidus embolization). The primary outcome was obliteration rate. Secondary outcomes were post-SRS bleeding (PSB), post-embolization neurological complications (PENC) and post-SRS neurological complications (PSNC). Subgroup analyses included embolic agent, embolization intent and radiosurgery type. Proportional meta-analyses and meta-regressions were performed. RESULTS: Forty-one studies were included in the review. The pooled obliteration rate was 56.45% (95% CI 50.94 to 61.88). Meta-regression analyses showed higher obliteration rates with Copolymers and lower obliteration rates with Devascularizing embolization. The pooled PSB, PENC and PSNC rates were 5.50%, 13.75% and 5.02%, respectively. Meta-regression analyses showed higher rates of PSB, PENC and PSNC with Devascularizing embolization, Liquid & Solid embolic agents and Targeted & Devascularizing intent, respectively. CONCLUSION: Embolic agent and embolization intent were procedural factors associated with treatment outcomes of E + SRS in the management of bAVM patients. The efficacy and safety profiles favor copolymers as embolic agents and disfavor Devascularizing as embolization intent. STUDY REGISTRATION: The protocol of the systematic review was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42023474171.

Increased Dose in Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Metastatic Disease: Are We Underestimating the Risks?

Background and Objectives: The recently published Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SSRS) ESTRO guidelines advise against treating spinal metastatic disease with a single dose equal to or smaller than 18 Gy, prioritizing local control over the potential for complications. This study aims to assess the necessity and validity of these higher dose recommendations by evaluating the outcomes and experiences with lower radiation doses. Materials and Methods: A retrospective evaluation of SSRS patients treated at a single institute was conducted. The outcomes and complications of this cohort were compared to the current literature and the data supporting the new ESTRO guidelines. Results: A total of 149 treatment sessions involving 242 spinal levels were evaluated. The overall local control rate was 91.2%. The mean radiation dose for the local control group compared to the local failure group was similar (17.5 vs. 17.6 Gy, not significant). The overall complication rate was 6%. These results are consistent with previous publications evaluating SSRS for metastatic spinal disease. Conclusions: SSRS dose escalation may increase local control efficacy but comes with a higher risk of complications. The evidence supporting the strong recommendations in the recent ESTRO guidelines is not robust enough to justify a universal application. Given the palliative nature of treatment for metastatic patients, dose determination should be individualized based on patient conditions and preferences, with a detailed discussion about the risk-benefit ratio of increased doses and the level of evidence supporting these recommendations.

Dosimetric predictors of acute and late gastrointestinal toxicities in stereotactic online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (SMART) for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A retrospective evaluation of dosimetric predictors and leveraged dose-volume data for gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities for locally-advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with daily stereotactic MRI-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy (SMART). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 147 patients with LAPC were treated with SMART at our institution between 2018 and 2021. Patients were evaluated using CTCAE V5.0 for RT-related acute (≤3 months) and late (>3 months) toxicities. Each organ at risk (OAR) was matched to a ≥ grade 2 (Gr2+) toxicity endpoint composite group. A least absolute shrinkage selector operator regression model was constructed by dose-volumes per OAR to account for OAR multicollinearity. A receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis was performed for the combined averages of significant toxicity groups to identify critical volumes per dose levels. RESULTS: 18 of 147 patients experienced Gr2+ GI toxicity. 17 Gr2+ duodenal toxicities were seen; the most significant predictor was a V33Gy odds ratio (OR) of 1.69 per cc (95 % CI 1.14-2.88). 17 Gr2+ small bowel (SB) toxicities were seen; the most significant predictor was a V33Gy OR of 1.60 per cc (95 % CI 1.01-2.53). The AUC was 0.72 for duodenum and SB. The optimal duodenal cut-point was 1.00 cc (true positive (TP): 17.8 %; true negative (TN); 94.9 %). The SB cut-point was 1.75 cc (TP: 16.7 %; TN: 94.3 %). No stomach or large bowel dose toxicity predictors were identified. CONCLUSIONS: For LAPC treated with SMART, the dose-volume threshold of V33Gy for duodenum and SB was associated with Gr2+ toxicities. These metrics can be utilized to guide future dose-volume constraints for patients undergoing upper abdominal SBRT.