Prevention of perioperative anxiety: Interest of audiovisual distraction.

INTRODUCTION: Audiovisual distraction (AVD) is one of the non-pharmacological means of anxiety prevention. However, few studies have evaluated its perioperative effect in adults. AIM: To evaluate the contribution of audio-visual distraction in the prevention of perioperative anxiety in adult patients proposed for surgery under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled study lasting three months from July 1, 2021. We included ASA I to III over 18 years patients, proposed for visceral or orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia. We didn't include patients operated in lateral or prone positions or with a history of anxiety disorders or communication difficulties. 90 patients were randomized into two groups: a control group T and a group A who had an AVD throughout the operation. The primary outcome was anxiety as assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: Demographic characteristics, Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS) and pain levels were comparable between the two groups. During the surgery, 22 (48.9 %) patients in group T versus 3 (6.7 %) in group A required Midazolam (p < 0.001). Anxiety assessed by VAS at the end of the act was lower in group A (p < 0.001). The pain levels also were lower in patients who received AVD (p = 0.004). A patient satisfaction score (Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale French version) ≥ 5.4 was more frequently observed in group A (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: AVD reduced perioperative anxiety and decreased the use of midazolam during surgery performed under spinal anesthesia.

Thoracic Continuous Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Destroyed Lung Resulted in Favorable Perioperative Outcome.

Among patients needing open abdominal surgery, those with high-risk medical conditions impose significant challenges from an anesthesia point of view. Thoracic continuous spinal anesthesia (TCSA) is an evolving technique that may be beneficial for a subset of patients with underlying high-risk medical conditions where general anesthesia (GA) becomes a relative contraindication. TCSA, as a primary anesthesia technique, is gaining favor for its advantages over GA in open abdominal surgery as it avoids airway intervention and mechanical ventilation. The current article focuses on TCSA in 2 patients at high risk for GA, which resulted in favorable perioperative outcomes.

Comparison of spinal anesthesia and local anesthesia in percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5/S1 disc herniation: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) is a prevalent method for managing lumbar disc herniation. Local anesthesia (LA) is frequently employed during IELD, albeit with its merits and drawbacks. The spinal anesthesia (SA) represents a feasible anesthetic strategy for IELD; however, the availability of clinical research data is currently limited. METHODS: The propensity score matching was conducted to ensure the comparability of the SA and LA groups. The outcome measures were operation time, intraoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, need for adjuvant analgesia, intraoperative vital signs, blood loss, adverse surgical events, anesthesia-related complications, postoperative bed rest duration, VAS for pain at 2 h postoperatively, Oswestry Disability Index score (ODI), satisfaction with surgical efficacy, and willingness to undergo reoperation at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were assigned to each group. Significant differences were found between the groups regarding intraoperative VAS for pain, use of adjuvant analgesics, willingness to undergo reoperation, maximum intraoperative systolic blood pressure, and variability (P < 0.05). Compared to the LA group, the SA group had lower VAS for pain at 2 h postoperatively, a longer operation time, a longer duration of postoperative bedrest, and more anesthesia-related complications (P < 0.05). No significant intergroup differences were detected in intraoperative heart rate variability, blood loss, ODI, satisfaction with surgical efficacy, and surgery-related complications (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: SA as an alternative anesthesia for IELD surgery holds great promise, exhibiting superior efficacy compared to LA. However, it is crucial to meticulously evaluate the indications due to potential risks associated with this form of anesthesia.

Perioperative Management of Lower Limb Surgery in a Patient with Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: A Case Report.

ABSTRACT: Heart failure poses significant challenges in perioperative settings, with an increasing prevalence in India. While much attention has been given to the management of symptomatic heart failure, there is a dearth of literature on asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ALVSD). In this case report, we present the successful perioperative management of a 35-year-old male with ALVSD and a low ejection fraction undergoing lower limb surgery under combined spinal epidural anesthesia. Our approach aimed to maintain hemodynamic stability, minimize myocardial overload, and mitigate the adverse effects of neuraxial blockade.

General anesthesia is associated with lower perioperative bleeding and better functional outcomes than spinal anesthesia for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate (B-TUEP) are safe and effective treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Spinal anesthesia (SA) is widely used for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) in place of general anesthesia (GA). We aimed to assess the impact of GA vs. SA on blood loss, postoperative course and functional outcomes after HoLEP and B-TUEP. METHODS: After propensity score matching, we analyzed data from 148 patients treated with EEP in our centre for symptomatic BPH. We recorded patient's characteristics, procedural data, type of anesthesia (SA vs. GA). Postoperatively we evaluated hemoglobin drop, catheterization time (CT), and length of hospital stay (LOS). Functional outcomes were evaluated with the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) at baseline and 3 months after surgery. Descriptive statistics and linear regression models tested the association between anesthesia type and EEP outcomes. RESULTS: After matching groups were comparable in terms of pre- and intra-operative variables. Of all, 111 (75%) patients were treated under SA. Haemoglobin drop was lower in GA compared to SA group (1 vs. 1.4 g/dL, p < 0.01). CT was shorter in the GA group (1 vs. 2 days, p = 0.01). Postoperative IPSS score was lower in GA group (4 vs. 8, p = 0.04). Multivariable linear regression models revealed that prostate volume (p = 0.01) and SA vs. GA (p = 0.01) were associated with higher haemoglobin drop, after accounting for age and use of anticoagulants/antiplatelets. Similarly, SA vs. GA (p = 0.02) and postoperative complications occurrence (p < 0.001) were associated with a longer LOS, after accounting for age, prostate volume and use of anticoagulants/antiplatelets. CONCLUSION: EEP can be safely performed under both GA and SA. GA offers better outcomes in terms of perioperative bleeding and 3-month functional outcomes.

The effect of music therapy on anxiety and pain scores in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) under spinal anesthesia: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial.

To prospectively investigate the effect of music therapy on patient's anxiety and pain level during retrograde intrarenal surgery under spinal anesthesia. 286 patients aged above 18 years, who underwent Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) under spinal anesthesia for renal or ureteral calculi were evaluated between January 2023 and June 2023 by a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical protocol. Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 included patients, who listened to music, and Group 2 was comprised of patients, who were not allowed to listen to music. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) results and pain sensation, anxiety level, together with the results of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), a self-reported anxiety inventory, were captured. The number of patients, who were randomized to the music group (Group 1) and non-music group (Group 2) was 144 and 142, respectively. Mean heart rate in Group 1 and Group 2 was 60 ± 4.19 and 70 ± 8.36, respectively (p = 0.02), indicative of the fact that mean heart rate was significantly lower in the music group. Heart rate measured post-operatively within the first hour subsequent to the procedure was similar in both groups (p < 0.05). The VAS score was significantly lower in Group 1. STAI score in Group 1 and Group 2 was 45.51 ± 2.968 and 49.16 ± 1.88, respectively. Therefore, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Music therapy during the RIRS procedure under spinal anesthesia was associated with a significantly decrease in pain and anxiety scores in patients.

The Prophylactic Effect of Acetaminophen and Caffeine on Post Dural Puncture Headache after Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Background: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is the most common complication following spinal anesthesia among parturients undergoing cesarean section surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of acetaminophen and caffeine in preventing PDPH. Methods: This double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 96 obstetric women, who were candidates for elective cesarean section. Following the randomization of participants into two groups, participants in the intervention group received tablets of acetaminophen (500 mg)+caffeine (65 mg), and participants in the control group received placebo tablets orally 2 hours before spinal anesthesia induction and then every 6 hours after surgery up to 24 hours. All parturients were evaluated for frequency and intensity of PDPH every 6 hours until 24 hours after surgery and then 48 and 72 hours after surgery. Overall satisfaction during the first 72 hours of postpartum was evaluated. The data were analyzed using SPSS software. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Participants in the intervention group were 70% less likely to experience PDPH after spinal anesthesia (OR=0.31 P=0.01, 95% CI [0.12-0.77]). They also experienced significantly milder headaches 18 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours later. Participants in the intervention group reported higher levels of satisfaction at the end of the study (P=0.01). No side effects related to the intervention were reported. Conclusion: Prophylactic administration of acetaminophen+caffeine decreases 70% the risk of PDPH and significantly attenuates pain intensity in obstetric patients who underwent spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

Effect of needle types and diameters using in spinal anesthesia on optic nerve sheath diameter: Prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: This prospective randomized study aimed to investigate the impact of needle types and diameters used in spinal anesthesia (SA) on optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in patients undergoing lower extremity orthopedic surgery. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups based on the needle type and size used for SA: Group 25w (25 gauge Whitacre needle), Group 27q (27 gauge Quincke needle), and Group 25q (25 gauge Quincke needle). Initially, 165 patients (55 in each group) were enrolled, with 146 patients ultimately included in the analysis (Group 25w, n = 49; Group 27q, n = 48; Group 25q, n = 49). ONSD measurements were conducted using ultrasound guidance at 5 time points: T0 (pre-SA), T1 (5 minutes post-SA), T2 (5 minutes post-tourniquet inflation), T3 (5 minutes post-tourniquet deflation), and T4 (24 hours post-operation). Additionally, oxygen saturation, systolic arterial pressure, mean arterial pressure, diastolic arterial pressure, and heart rate were recorded at these time points. RESULTS: Analysis of ONSD measurements revealed no significant differences among the groups at time points T0,T1,T2, and T4 (P = .7293, P = .4428, P = .3676, and P = .3667, respectively). However, at T3, ONSD values were significantly higher in Group 27q compared to Group 25q (P = .0325). Across all groups, the mean ONSD values measured post-tourniquet release (T3) were higher than those at T0,T2, and T4 (P < .001 for all). The incidence of nausea was similar among the groups, and no cases of headache or visual impairment were reported within the initial 24 hours post-surgery. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study suggests that while subarachnoid injection and tourniquet inflation do not impact intracranial pressure (ICP), tourniquet deflation leads to an increase in ICP during lower limb surgery under SA. Therefore, caution should be exercised when using a tourniquet in patients at risk of elevated ICP.

Comparison of Pudendal Nerve Block and Spinal Anesthesia in Proctological Surgeries: Efficacy, Safety, and Patient Outcomes.

Background and Objectives: The selection of an appropriate anesthesia method is a critical factor in the surgical treatment of proctological diseases, significantly impacting patient outcomes and comfort. Pudendal nerve block (PNB) and spinal anesthesia (SA) are commonly employed in these surgeries, yet the optimal choice between the two remains debated. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of PNB and SA in patients undergoing surgical treatment for various proctological conditions, with a focus on postoperative pain management, functional outcomes, and complication rates. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 590 patients who underwent proctological surgery under either PNB (n = 435) or SA (n = 155). Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while functional outcomes were measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Statistical analysis was performed to compare the outcomes between the two groups. Results: Patients in the PNB group reported significantly lower postoperative VAS scores compared to those in the SA group, particularly in hemorrhoidectomy and laser hemorrhoidoplasty procedures. The PNB group also demonstrated superior functional outcomes, with lower postoperative WHODAS 2.0 scores and a reduced incidence of urinary retention compared to the SA group. Furthermore, the duration of surgery and hospital stay were significantly shorter for patients in the PNB group. Conclusions: The findings suggest that PNB may offer advantages over SA in proctological surgeries, particularly in terms of pain management, functional recovery, and reduced complication rates. PNB should be considered a viable alternative to SA, particularly in cases where rapid recovery and minimizing complications are priorities. Exceptions to this include specific proctological surgeries, such as those for malignant tumors in the region, complex anal fistulas, proctological conditions arising from inflammatory bowel diseases, and patients on immunosuppressive therapy. Further research is needed to confirm these results and optimize anesthesia selection in this context.

Ultrasound-guided spinal anaesthesia for a patient with severe scoliosis.

Ultrasound (US) guided spinal anaesthesia is gaining recognition for its ability to minimise technical difficulties encountered in patients with atypical spinal anatomy. Spinal anaesthesia is administered during a surgical procedure lithotripsy in patients with respiratory complications that can result from severe scoliosis or cerebral palsy. Here, we report a case in which US-guided spinal anaesthesia proved feasible and advantageous in a patient with cerebral paralysis and severe scoliosis. A man in his 60s with cerebral paralysis and severe scoliosis was scheduled for spinal anaesthesia because of his nocturnal SpO2 drops and need for nasal high flow. Using US guidance, we confirmed that the needle entry angle was consistent with the rotating spinous process. The spinal needle was then advanced successfully, and spinal anaesthesia was administered without issue. The US technique for detecting the rotation of the vertebrae and puncturing them is useful in patients with severe scoliosis.

Delivery management of pregnant blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome patients: a case report and literature review.

Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome (BRBNS) is a rare systemic vascular disorder characterized by multifocal venous malformations (VMs). Little is known about the perinatal management of pregnant women with BRBNS owing to the limited number of reported cases. We present the case of a 36-year-old primigravida with BRBNS who underwent an uneventful cesarean section under spinal anesthesia for breech presentation. A thorough systemic examination revealed VMs in various organs, including the skin, conjunctiva, larynx, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, and vulva. Prior to spinal anesthesia, careful examination using imaging modalities was conducted to assess the spinal and epidural involvement of the VMs to avoid complications, including accidental puncture of the VMs, associated bleeding, and epidural hematoma. In pregnant women with BBNS, it is imperative to scrutinize the localization and distribution of VMs throughout the body to anticipate potential complications and select the appropriate delivery mode and anesthetic management.

Comparison of four different protocols using levobupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in red-footed tortoises (Chelonoidis carbonarius).

Background: The popularity of tortoises kept in captivity is increasing and has caused concern regarding the necessity to establish safe and straightforward anaesthesia for those reptiles. Aim: This study aimed to compare four protocols using levobupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for the blockade of the caudal neuraxis of red-footed tortoises (Chelonoidis carbonarius). Methods: Twenty-four tortoises were randomly assigned into four groups: G1, levobupivacaine 0.75% (1.15 mg kg-1); G2, levobupivacaine 0.37% (1.15 mg kg-1); G3, levobupivacaine 0.75% (2.3 mg kg-1); and G4, levobupivacaine 0.75% (0.1 ml 5 cm-1 of straight carapace length). Tortoises were evaluated for respiratory rate, muscle relaxation, response to hindlimb or tail pinch, and cloacal reflex. Results: A 1.15 mg kg-1 dose of levobupivacaine 0.37% appears adequate for shorter procedures, whereas a 1.15 mg kg-1 dose of levobupivacaine 0.75% should be appropriate for longer procedures in red-footed tortoises. Conclusion: Our results are the first to show the effects of levobupivacaine on spinal anaesthesia in reptiles. Weight-based doses presented more intense and more homogeneous effects than carapace length-based doses in red-footed tortoises. Spinal anaesthesia of red-footed tortoises was safe and effective with any of the weight-based protocols.

Postoperative Outcomes of the Awake Colorectal Surgery with Neuraxial Anaesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome of awake surgery with combined spinal epidural in geriatric colon cancer patients with advanced comorbidity. STUDY DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye, from April 2022 to 2023. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-four American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I-II patients, aged 25-65 years and scheduled for colon cancer surgery were included in this research. All patients were observed preoperatively, at the operation room and at the postoperative surgery service. Spinal anaesthesia was planned for Group I and general anaesthesia for Group II. Ketofol (1:1) was administered to the combined spinal-epidural group, with a Ramsay sedation score of 3 after the spinal block. Epidural analgesia was planned for all patients. Patients' age, gender, weight, comorbidities, ASA risk scores, intraoperative haemodynamic parameters, bleeding amounts, colloid, crystalloid, and blood products were collected. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the demographic characteristics of both anaesthesia groups (p >0.05). The amount of bleeding was statistically lower in Group I than in the general anaesthesia group (p = 0.004). Oral intake, drain withdrawal, mobilisation, discharge times, and costs were similar in all groups (p >0.05). CONCLUSION: The regional anaesthesia applications facilitate compliance with routine mobilisation, discharge procedures and prevent complications in abdominal surgery and its positive perioperative effects in patients with poor respiratory parameters, poor general condition, and high comorbidity in advanced age. KEY WORDS: Regional anaesthesia, Spinal-epidural, Mobilisation, Pain, Colon cancer.

The Effect of Anesthesia Type on the Stability of the Surgical View on the Monitor in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stone: A Prospective Observational Trial.

Background and Objectives: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive technique for nephrolithiasis. RIRS is performed via a monitor screen displaying a magnified surgical site. Respiration can affect the stability of the surgical view during RIRS because the kidneys are close to the diaphragm. The purpose of this trial is to compare the effect of anesthesia type on the stability of the surgical view during RIRS between spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: Patients were allocated to the general anesthesia group or spinal anesthesia group. During surgery, movement of the surgical field displayed on the monitor screen was graded by the first assistant on a 10-grade numeric rating scale (0-10). Next, it was also graded by the main surgeon. After surgery, we evaluated the discomfort with the anesthesia method for all patients. Results: Thirty-four patients were allocated to the general anesthesia group and 32 patients to the spinal anesthesia group. The average values of the two surgeons for surgical field oscillation grade showed vision on the monitor screen was more stable in the general anesthesia group than the spinal anesthesia group (3.3 ± 1.6 vs. 5.0 ± 1.6, p < 0.001). The degrees of the inconvenience of the surgery did not differ between the groups (0.7 ± 1.8 vs. 1.6 ± 2.6, p = 0.114), even though more patients reported inconvenience with a grade of 3 or more in the spinal anesthesia group (8.8% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.042). Conclusions: In terms of the visualization of the surgical site, general anesthesia might provide a more stable surgical view during RIRS compared to spinal anesthesia without increasing inconvenience induced by the type of anesthesia.

Peripartum anesthesia management and outcomes of patients with congenital heart disease: a single-center retrospective analysis (2009-2023).

BACKGROUND: Advances in medicine have enabled more patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) to become pregnant. However, these patients face significant challenges during the peripartum period. Current peripartum anesthesia guidelines for CHD patients mainly rely on case reports and small series. METHODS: In this retrospective study at a high-volume tertiary care center, we analyzed peripartum anesthetic approaches, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) incidence, and maternal outcomes in CHD patients stratified by the modified World Health Organization (mWHO) classification. RESULTS: Among 85 473 deliveries between 2009 and 2023, 409 occurred in 282 patients with CHD. Cesarean deliveries were significantly more frequent in mWHO class III, p=0.005. Labor epidural analgesia was the most common analgesic modality for vaginal deliveries (epidural rate was 71.1% with no differences between mWHO classes). Anesthesia management for cesarean deliveries varied significantly by class p<0.001. While spinal anesthesia was predominant in classes I and II, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was more common in class III. PPH incidence was 6.4%, with no significant difference across classes, and no association was found between mWHO class severity and PPH risk (OR 0.97; 95% CI; 0.93 to 1.02, p=0.2). Higher mWHO classes correlated with significantly higher intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, longer hospital stays, and one-year cardiac hospitalizations. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study on the peripartum anesthetic management and outcomes of CHD patients stratified by mWHO class, cases with greater mWHO class were more likely to deliver preterm, by cesarean delivery, with a combined spinal-epidural anesthetic and an arterial line placement for that cesarean delivery. They overall had a longer hospital stay and were more likely to be admitted to the ICU. However, the overall risk of PPH did not increase with mWHO class severity.

Novel approaches facilitating neuraxial anesthesia placement in pregnant women with morbid obesity: case descriptions.

Clinical management of pregnant women with morbid obesity poses challenges in performing neuraxial anesthesia as well as positioning for cesarean delivery. Occupational injuries are also known to occur while caring for patients with morbid obesity. We describe two novel approaches to assist neuraxial anesthesia administration and positioning for cesarean delivery. With the assistance of the Institution's Safe Patient Handling and Mobility Team, a universal high-back sling can be placed to lift the patient into a sitting position before neuraxial anesthesia procedure. After placement of combined spinal epidural anesthesia, the ceiling lift is used to lift the patient into a seated position and then rotate to the appropriate location on the operating room table to facilitate supine positioning. The lifting system reduces shearing of the patient's posterior and compromising the epidural site. Team members also report reduced effort required when positioning patients from seated to supine on the operating room table. The second approach is the application of TraxiTM abdominal pannus retractor to retract fat folds encroaching on the epidural placement site in pregnant women with morbid obesity. This is particularly useful when the traditional taping of fat folds away from the site is inadequate. The pannus retractor results in a flatter surface facilitating epidural placement. We have introduced these two approaches into our clinical practice for pregnant women with morbid obesity requiring cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia.

Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion versus treatment with vasopressor bolus as needed during non-urgent cesarean delivery and neonatal acidemia: a retrospective cohort study (2016-2021).

INTRODUCTION: Prophylactic vasopressor administration reduces spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery, however the effects of vasopressor administration on neonatal acidemia remain uncertain. We examined the occurrence of neonatal acidemia in the setting of non-urgent cesarean delivery and compared outcomes between cases receiving prophylactic phenylephrine infusion versus cases treated with boluses of phenylephrine. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with ethical approval, comparing non-urgent cesarean delivery cases performed under spinal anesthesia (2016 to 2021), receiving either prophylactic phenylephrine infusion or boluses as needed. Data were collected from anesthesia and labor ward electronic medical records. Records with missing pH or missing blood pressure data were excluded. The independent variable was prophylactic phenylephrine administration, a strategy implemented following international recommendations in 2018. The main outcome was neonatal acidemia, defined as umbilical artery pH < 7.1. The secondary outcome was maternal hypotension, defined as at least one systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurement below 100 mmHg or below 80% baseline. RESULTS: A total of 4392 patients were included in the final analysis; 1318 (30.0%) received prophylactic phenylephrine infusion. Neonatal acidemia (umbilical artery pH < 7.1) occurred in 28 (2.1%) cases receiving prophylactic phenylephrine versus 50 (1.6%) treated with boluses as needed (p = 0.188). Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was not associated with occurrence of neonatal acidemia (aOR 0.83; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.33, p = 0.435). Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was associated with a reduced spinal hypotension rate when defined as SBP < 100 mmHg (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.37 to 0.57; p < 0.001), with similar results when hypotension was defined as a drop below 80% or 90% of baseline SBP. CONCLUSION: In this pragmatic study, prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was associated with a reduction in maternal spinal hypotension, but not reduced neonatal acidemia.

Comparison of erector spinae plane and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Truncal blocks contribute to multimodal analgesia that enhances early recovery after caesarean delivery. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is an established technique that offers somatic abdominal wall analgesia. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a fascial plane technique that may offer additional visceral analgesic effects. This study hypothesized that ESP block would offer superior analgesic efficacy to TAP block in women undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia. METHODS: Sixty-six ASA physical status grade 1-3 (≥18 years) patients undergoing elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive either bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP (N = 33) or ESP blocks at the T9 vertebral level (N = 35). The primary outcome measure was 24-hour cumulative morphine consumption. The secondary outcomes included time to first analgesic request, duration of block placement, numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores at rest and movement, effect of pain on activities of daily living (ADLs) and care for the infant, patient analgesic satisfaction, frequency and severity of opioid-related side effects. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in mean (95% CI) 24-hour cumulative morphine consumption between groups: 32.0 (27.0 to 37.0) mg with TAP versus 27.0 (19.9 to 34.0) mg with ESP (p = 0.16). The mean (SD) duration of block placement was longer for ESP than for TAP blocks (10.7 (2.2) minutes versus 9.0 (2.5) minutes; p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study found similar postoperative opioid use and analgesic efficacy between ESP and TAP block after caesarean delivery performed under spinal anaesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: South African National Clinical Trial Registry (DOH-27-102022-5278): https://sanctr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=8100, Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202301645957324): https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=24267.

Maintenance infusion rate of oxytocin after initial 1-IU bolus for elective Cesarean delivery: a dose-finding study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to determine the minimum effective dose of oxytocin maintenance infusion required to maintain adequate uterine tone in 90% of patients (ED90) after administration of the initial bolus at elective Cesarean delivery (CD) under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, double-blind dose-finding study with biased coin up-down design. Immediately after delivery, a 1-IU oxytocin bolus was administered, followed by a maintenance infusion. The obstetrician assessed the uterine tone by palpation as satisfactory or unsatisfactory. In case of unsatisfactory response, the dose for the next patient was increased by 2 IU·hr-1. For satisfactory response, the dose for the next patient was either decreased by 2 IU·hr-1 with a probability of 1/9, or remained unchanged. The primary outcome was a satisfactory uterine tone from five minutes after delivery until discharge from postanesthesia care unit. The secondary outcomes were blood loss, need for additional uterotonics, and side effects. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 40 patients. The ED90 of oxytocin maintenance infusion was 4.5 IU·hr-1 (95% confidence interval, 3.3 to 5.5) based on the isotonic regression estimator. The median [interquartile range] blood loss was 861 [553-1,181] mL; 18% received additional uterotonics, and 38% developed hypotension post delivery. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this dose-finding study, we recommend a maintenance infusion rate of 4.5 IU·hr-1 following an oxytocin bolus of 1 IU for adequate uterine tone in pregnant patients undergoing elective CDs. This infusion rate is four-fold lower than that required without an initial bolus. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04946006 ); first submitted 25 June 2021.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'objectif de notre étude était de déterminer la dose minimale efficace de perfusion d'entretien d'ocytocine nécessaire pour maintenir un tonus utérin adéquat chez 90 % des personnes parturientes (DE90) après l'administration du bolus initial lors d'une césarienne programmée sous rachianesthésie. MéTHODE: Nous avons réalisé une étude prospective et en double aveugle de détermination de la dose avec une méthodologie de conception biaisée type « up-and down ¼. Immédiatement après l'accouchement, un bolus d'ocytocine de 1 UI a été administré, suivi d'une perfusion d'entretien. L'obstétricien·ne a évalué le tonus utérin par palpation comme satisfaisant ou insatisfaisant. En cas de réponse insatisfaisante, la dose pour la personne suivante a été augmentée de 2 UI·h−1. Lors d'une réponse satisfaisante, la dose pour la personne suivante a été diminuée de 2 UI·h−1 avec une probabilité de 1/9, ou est restée inchangée. Le critère d'évaluation principal était un tonus utérin satisfaisant de cinq minutes après l'accouchement jusqu'à la sortie de la salle de réveil. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires étaient la perte de sang, la nécessité d'utérotoniques supplémentaires et les effets secondaires. RéSULTATS: Nous avons analysé les données de 40 patient·es. La DE90 de perfusion d'entretien d'ocytocine était de 4,5 UI·h−1 (intervalle de confiance à 95 %, 3,3 à 5,5) basé sur l'estimateur de régression isotonique. La perte de sang médiane [écart interquartile] était de 861 [553-1 181] mL; 18 % ont reçu des utérotoniques supplémentaires et 38 % ont développé une hypotension après l'accouchement. CONCLUSION: D'après les résultats de cette étude de détermination de la dose, nous recommandons un débit de perfusion d'entretien de 4,5 UI·h−1 après un bolus d'ocytocine de 1 UI pour un tonus utérin adéquat chez les personnes parturientes bénéficiant d'une césarienne programmée. Ce débit de perfusion est quatre fois inférieur à celui requis sans bolus initial. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04946006 ); première soumission le 25 juin 2021.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block versus continuous paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing proximal femur surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Proximal femur fracture surgeries have become increasingly prevalent, presenting unique challenges for postoperative pain management due to patient demographics and comorbidities. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has emerged as a relatively safe alternative to paravertebral block (PVB). Our aim was to compare ultrasound-guided continuous ESPB with continuous PVB for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing proximal femur surgeries under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: A prospective randomized interventional study was conducted on 60 patients between 18 and 60 years of age undergoing proximal femur surgeries under spinal anesthesia with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II between January 2019 and April 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ultrasound-guided continuous ESPB (Group E, n = 30) or ultrasound-guided continuous PVB (Group P, n = 30) using a computer-generated randomization table. The mean maximum visual analog scale (VAS) score, VAS score in the first 24 h, the time of rescue analgesia, and total requirement of rescue analgesia were assessed. RESULTS: The maximum VAS score within the first 24 h was numerically higher in Group P but statistically insignificant (p-value 0.279). VAS scores at 0, 1, 2, 6, and 18 h postoperatively were comparable in both groups. However, at the 24-h mark, the VAS score between Group E and Group P was statistically significant (p-value 0.018) but not clinically relevant. The mean paracetamol and tramadol requirements were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Continuous ESPB is as effective as continuous PVB for postoperative analgesia in proximal femur surgeries. The enhanced safety profile of erector spinae block underscores its significance in postoperative pain management.