RESUMO
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors, in the form of injectable monoclonal antibodies, are a newer class of drugs for the prevention of migraine headaches. In clinical trials, they have been found to be effective with good tolerance and few adverse effects. Alopecia has been increasingly noted as a post-marketing event associated with CGRP inhibitor injectables. Of the case reports available on this topic, alopecia has commonly been localised to the scalp and associated with erenumab use; however, not as much has been reported for fremanezumab nor for injection site-related alopecia. We report an occurrence of persistent lower extremity localised injection site alopecia in a patient within our headache clinic who used fremanezumab. The possible mechanism of alopecia may be related to the failure of hair follicle immune privilege in the absence of CGRP immunomodulatory effects.
Assuntos
Alopecia , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Humanos , Alopecia/induzido quimicamente , Alopecia/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Reação no Local da Injeção , Peptídeo Relacionado com Gene de Calcitonina/antagonistas & inibidores , Peptídeo Relacionado com Gene de Calcitonina/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , AdultoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) plays a crucial role in embryo implantation and in maintenance of pregnancy. An immuno-contraceptive approach involves the use of a recombinant hCGß-LTB vaccine formulated with adjuvant Mycobacterium indicus pranii (MIP), to prevent pregnancy without disturbing ovulation, hormonal profiles, and menstrual cycles in women. The present work in mice was designed to address issues encountered in clinical trials conducted with hCGß-LTB vaccine, with focus on two primary concerns. Firstly, it aimed to determine the optimal vaccine dosage required to induce a high level of anti-hCG antibodies. Secondly, it aimed to assess the safety profile of the vaccine, specifically injection site reactions in the form of nodules, observed in some of the subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS: Studies undertaken indicate that a 2 µg dose of the protein version of the vaccine, administered in mice through the intramuscular route, can induce high anti-hCG titres. Furthermore, administering a booster dose enhances the antibody response. Our findings suggest that the concentration and frequency of administration of the adjuvant MIP can also be reduced without compromising vaccine efficacy. CONCLUSION: The issue of nodule formation at the injection site can be mitigated either by administering the vaccine along with MIP intramuscularly or injecting hCG vaccine and MIP at separate intradermal sites. Thus, protein vaccine administered at a 2µg dose via the intramuscular route addresses both efficacy and safety concerns.
The Phase I/II clinical trials initiated with the recombinant hCG vaccine in women revealed inadequate antibody titres in all subjects, alongside the development of nodules at the injection sites in some participants. Studies were undertaken in mice to propose potential strategies for mitigating injection site reactions and enhancing the antibody response. It was concluded that the optimum dose of the protein version of the vaccine to get high antibody titres, is 2 µg administered intramuscularly while upholding safety standards.
Assuntos
Gonadotropina Coriônica , Vacinas Sintéticas , Animais , Feminino , Camundongos , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Gonadotropina Coriônica/imunologia , Anticoncepção Imunológica/métodos , Vacinas Anticoncepcionais/imunologia , Formação de Anticorpos/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Adjuvantes Imunológicos , Reação no Local da Injeção , Engenharia Genética , Injeções Intramusculares , Gonadotropina Coriônica Humana Subunidade beta/imunologiaRESUMO
Bullous pemphigoid is often difficult to treat with the limited therapies available. Here, we describe clinical outcomes among 30 adults with bullous pemphigoid patients treated with dupilumab. We performed a multicenter, retrospective case series between March 2020 to August 2022. Patients received a loading dose of dupilumab 600 mg, followed by 300 mg maintenance dose with varying administration frequency tailored to individual patient response. All patients experienced at least some improvement in blister formation and pruritus, with 23 (76.7%) of patients demonstrating either complete clearance of blistering or marked response. Complete clearance of pruritus or marked response was noted in 25 (83.3%) of patients. Eight patients were effectively maintained solely on dupilumab. One (3.3%) patient reported an injection site reaction. Thirty patients represent a small sample, however, to our knowledge, this is the second largest group of BP treated with dupilumab. Furthermore, we provide an understandable framework for clinicians outside of academics to follow and assess treatment responses in their BP patients treated with dupilumab. Dupilumab should be considered as a therapeutic option in patients with bullous pemphigoid given its ability to induce sustained blistering and pruritus response in both typical and refractory cases while maintaining a favorable safety profile. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):e144-e148. doi:10.36849/JDD.8258e.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Penfigoide Bolhoso , Prurido , Humanos , Penfigoide Bolhoso/tratamento farmacológico , Penfigoide Bolhoso/diagnóstico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Prurido/tratamento farmacológico , Prurido/etiologia , Prurido/diagnóstico , Adulto , Reação no Local da Injeção/etiologia , Reação no Local da Injeção/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium welchii (Mycobacterium w) vaccine was one of the many strategies used to both treat and prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. We report the results of a retrospective analysis of 15 cases with vaccine-site granulomas after administration of prophylactic Mycobacterium w vaccine as part of a trial for COVID-19 and our experience in managing those cases. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 15 patients with vaccine-site granulomas who were given the vaccine as a prophylactic measure as part of a trial with informed consent. RESULTS: The mean average age of cases was 37 and the male-to-female ratio was 1:0.87. All of the patients developed erythematous tender nodules over the injection sites within a month of receiving the inoculations. Mycobacterial cultures and cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification tests yielded negative results. Skin biopsy revealed granulomatous dermatitis with acid-fast bacilli positivity. A diagnosis of noninfective granulomatous dermatitis was made. Treatment started with analgesics and anti-inflammatory agents. Systemic antibiotics were required in 9/15 patients. Patients are being followed up with no reported recurrence till date. CONCLUSION: The possibility of injection-site granuloma should be taken into the risk-benefit analysis for the administration of Mycobacterium w vaccine and the patients should be counseled as such. Patients with persistent ulceration respond to combinations of doxycycline, ofloxacin, and clarithromycin.
Assuntos
Vacinas Bacterianas , Granuloma , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Granuloma/microbiologia , Granuloma/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacinas Bacterianas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Bacterianas/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Reação no Local da Injeção/etiologia , Adulto Jovem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
In Japan, cutaneous adverse events (AEs) following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination have been frequently described; however, a larger case series and literature review are lacking. There is an urgent need for an extensive investigation of new cases and previous reports to provide a thorough body of information about post-COVID-19 immunization cutaneous AEs. We aimed to analyze patients with cutaneous AEs after COVID-19 vaccination in our hospital and review previous studies of cutaneous AEs. We analyzed post-COVID-19 vaccination cutaneous AEs in our department, the Japanese Registry, and previous literature. We enrolled 30 patients with cutaneous post-vaccination AEs in our department over 2 years (April 1, 2021, to March 31, 2023). We also confirmed cases registered in the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare COVID-19 vaccine side effect reporting system (February 17, 2021-March 12, 2023). A total of 587 records were retrieved and 93 articles were included for data extraction. A total of 28 non-injection-site cutaneous AEs and two injection-site AEs were identified. Six (20.0%) patients developed new-onset erythematous eruptions, and five (16.7%) patients developed urticaria. Pruritic eruption, eczema, shingles, and sweating symptoms have also been reported. In previous studies on non-injection-site cutaneous AEs, individuals who received the BNT162b2 vaccine were older than those who received mRNA-1273 (P < 0.01). Cutaneous AEs were mostly nonsignificant and self-limiting reactions; however, rare, severe, or life-threatening AEs were also reported. Physicians should be aware of the various possible cutaneous AEs associated with the COVID-19 vaccination.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Toxidermias , Urticária , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV/efeitos adversos , Vacina BNT162/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Toxidermias/etiologia , Toxidermias/epidemiologia , População do Leste Asiático , Eritema/induzido quimicamente , Reação no Local da Injeção/etiologia , Japão/epidemiologia , Urticária/induzido quimicamente , Vacinação/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: With the continuous increasing availability of new filler products, each hyaluronic acid filler brand has distinctive pharmacokinetics, which may be associated with different complications. Therefore, the long-term safety of new generations of fillers should be evaluated. OBJECTIVE: This prospective, multicenter, observational, postmarketing study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04738019) aimed to investigate the incidence of delayed-onset nodules and adverse reactions after the injection of new hyaluronic acid fillers (YYS series) into the facial skin. METHODS: Subjects scheduled to receive an injection YYS series filler were followed up for 52 weeks. The authors aimed to determine the incidence of a self-reported delayed-onset nodule-a visible or palpable nodule or mass at the injection site that was detected beyond the 14th day following the injection-during the 1-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Among the 1,022 subjects who received an injection of the YYS series, the incidences of delayed-onset nodules were 0% for YYS 360, YYS 540, and YYS 720. A 0.21% incidence (1 delayed hypersensitivity reaction) of a delayed-onset adverse reaction was noted for YYS 720, although none were reported for YYS 360 and YYS 540. CONCLUSION: In this study, a notably low frequency of adverse reactions associated with the YYS series was observed.
Assuntos
Técnicas Cosméticas , Preenchedores Dérmicos , Ácido Hialurônico , Humanos , Ácido Hialurônico/efeitos adversos , Ácido Hialurônico/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Feminino , Preenchedores Dérmicos/efeitos adversos , Preenchedores Dérmicos/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Adulto , Técnicas Cosméticas/efeitos adversos , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Reação no Local da Injeção/epidemiologia , Reação no Local da Injeção/etiologia , Seguimentos , FaceRESUMO
Adalimumab (ADL, Humira®, reference product), an anti-TNF-α biologic, has transformed the treatment of chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. However, the high cost of ADL therapy has driven the development of more affordable ADL biosimilars, agents with no clinically meaningful differences from the reference product. This review summarizes the product attributes of reference ADL and the nine ADL biosimilars approved and available in the USA in relation to patient experience of injection-site pain (ISP). Product formulation, delivery volume and device features (e.g., type and needle gauge size) influence patient experience of ISP with potential clinical consequences. Citrate-free formulations generally cause less ISP; injection volumes of > 1.5 ml may be associated with increased ISP. Reference ADL and all ADL biosimilars offer a citrate-free formulation, and reference ADL and four ADL biosimilars offer a high-concentration solution that allows a smaller injection volume. All available ADL products are injected subcutaneously using either a pre-filled pen (PFP) or pre-filled syringe (PFS). Patients prefer the PFP, but the PFS permits better control over the speed and duration of injection. Smaller (29-gauge) needle outer diameter is associated with less ISP; reference ADL and seven ADL biosimilars offer a device with a 29-gauge needle. In the USA, an approved biosimilar can be designated "interchangeable," allowing pharmacy-level substitution, where state law permits. In the USA, two ADL biosimilars have received interchangeability designation; others are seeking interchangeability designation from the Food and Drug Administration (n = 2), are being evaluated in clinical studies to support interchangeability (n = 2), or do not have/are not seeking interchangeability designation (n = 3). Product-related attributes influence patient experience of ISP caused by subcutaneous ADL injection. Reference ADL and ADL biosimilar products differ in their attributes, so discussion with patients about treatment options is essential to optimize adherence and outcomes.
Assuntos
Adalimumab , Medicamentos Biossimilares , Medicamentos Biossimilares/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Reação no Local da InjeçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patient esthetic satisfaction following facial fillers is an essential topic that should be studied as the number of individuals seeking treatment increases. The face is an essential component of the human body that is frequently associated with beauty, youthfulness, and health. Individuals may seek facial augmentation with fillers for a variety of reasons, such as congenital, acquired by means of aging or disease, or current aesthetic trends. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to assess patient's aesthetic satisfaction and description of common clinical complications in relation to the facial filler injections. METHOD: A cross sectional survey using a questionnaire derived from the global aesthetic improvement scale and WHO quality of life scale, convenience sampling was used to recruit patients attending cosmetic clinics, descriptive analysis and Chi-square methods were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: In the study, 500 female participants, with an average age of 28.48 years, were included. Over 90% reported improvement after filler treatment, ranging from improved to very much improved. A statistically significant correlation was observed between patient satisfaction and the number of filler treatments and the anatomical injection site. However, no statistically significant correlation was found when considering age groups. Local side effects, such as swelling and redness at the injection site, were common but generally mild and of short duration. CONCLUSION: Although the satisfaction level is currently high, practitioners in the field need to pay more attention to this important outcome, since understanding the patient's motivation and expectation before proceeding with the procedure is very important and can contribute significantly in determining patient satisfaction with the result.
Assuntos
Técnicas Cosméticas , Preenchedores Dérmicos , Face , Satisfação do Paciente , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Adulto , Preenchedores Dérmicos/efeitos adversos , Técnicas Cosméticas/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Estética , Adolescente , Idoso , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reação no Local da Injeção/etiologia , Reação no Local da Injeção/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Data are limited regarding the safety associated with administering valproate sodium by intravenous push (IVP) compared with intravenous piggyback (IVPB). The objective of this retrospective pre-post analysis was to compare the safety profile of valproate administration via IVPB from March to May 2022 and IVP from June to August 2022. METHODS: A total of 890 IVPB and 440 IVP administrations were included. The major endpoint of this analysis was the incidence of infusion site reactions (infiltration or phlebitis). RESULTS: The incidence of documented intravenous (IV) site reactions demonstrated minimal differences between both IVPB and IVP administration cohorts. Based on the Naranjo algorithm, all IVPB and IVP infusion site reactions were classified as possible or doubtful. Additional safety endpoints included bradycardia, hypotension, or sedation attributable to valproate sodium administration. Similar safety profiles were observed, including valproate-associated bradycardia, hypotension, and sedation events. All safety events were further classified as possible or doubtful by the Naranjo algorithm. Time from pharmacist verification to valproate administration was also collected. The mean time from pharmacist order verification to valproate administration was significantly faster in the IVP cohort compared to the IVPB cohort. CONCLUSION: IVP valproate administration may be considered safe, allowing for more optimal clinical and operational outcomes in the acute care setting.
Assuntos
Hipotensão , Ácido Valproico , Humanos , Ácido Valproico/efeitos adversos , Reação no Local da Injeção , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bradicardia , Infusões IntravenosasRESUMO
Long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine has revolutionized the concept of antiretroviral therapy, but as the causes of virological failure and satisfaction can depend on patient background, real-world data are needed. In this single-center study, we reviewed clinical records of people with HIV (PWH) who received injectable cabotegravir plus rilpivirine between June 2022 and January 2023. We assessed virological and safety outcomes, including injection site reactions (ISRs) and changes in serum creatinine and cystatin C. Seventy-four patients were included. There were no virological failures. Approximately 80% of individuals achieved HIV-RNA undetectable in all visits up to 14 months (median 13 months) after switching. Pain upon injection was significantly more common at the rilpivirine injection site, while delayed pain was significantly more common at the cabotegravir injection site. The serum creatinine (mean difference -0.12 mg/dL, p < .0001) and the cystatin C (mean difference -0.077 mg/dL, p < .0001) decreased significantly after switching, and in multivariable regression analysis, baseline characteristics did not affect the decrease in these renal function markers. Long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine showed excellent antiviral efficacy and safety in PWH in Japan. ISRs were characterized differently at the cabotegravir and rilpivirine injection sites. Although cystatin C showed decrease after the regimen switch, further confirmation is needed whether cabotegravir plus rilpivirine can improve renal function.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV , Dicetopiperazinas , Infecções por HIV , HIV-1 , Piridonas , Humanos , Fármacos Anti-HIV/efeitos adversos , Antirretrovirais/uso terapêutico , Povo Asiático , Creatinina , Cistatina C , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , HIV-1/genética , Reação no Local da Injeção/tratamento farmacológico , Rim , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Rilpivirina/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , JapãoRESUMO
Background: Injection site reaction (ISR) is a local phenomenon defined as a constellation of symptoms, including swelling, erythema, pruritus, and pain around the site of injection.Objective: ISR is reported as a frequent adverse event after subcutaneous injection (SCI) of several biologics.Methods: We performed an observational real-life study to compare dupilumab and tralokinumab as regards ISR, analysing frequency, duration and intensity of symptoms related to SCI. From January 2023 to June 2023, we enrolled adult patients affected by moderate to severe AD and being on dupilumab or tralokinumab treatment. A 12 items questionnaire was administered to all enrolled patients.Results and conclusions: Three hundred and ninety-two patients were included. ISR was a frequent occurrence in both the treatment groups, with tralokinumab causing ISR more frequently than dupilumab. However, the reactions were generally mild and no patient stopped therapy.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Dermatite Atópica , Reação no Local da Injeção , Adulto , Humanos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Atópica/complicações , Método Duplo-Cego , Reação no Local da Injeção/etiologia , Reação no Local da Injeção/epidemiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers are widely used in aesthetic medicine. While generally safe, potential complications can arise. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to identify and classify potential complications linked to the use of HA dermal fillers, as informed by high-quality, low-risk-of-bias studies. METHODS: This review follows the Cochrane review standards for clinical systematic reviews. This systematic review analyzed 48 high level of evidence studies on the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers in non-surgical facial aesthetics and the adverse events that occurred.The inclusion criteria were randomized control studies on HA dermal fillers and their complications. Excluded were case reports, case series, observational studies, and other non-randomized research due to their inability to provide generalized conclusions and their inherent publication bias. RESULTS: Adverse events were classified into three categories: expected reactions, product or technique-related adverse events, and severe adverse events. Most adverse events were short-lived injection site reactions, which resolved spontaneously. Specific HA fillers and injection techniques influenced the occurrence of adverse events, which generally resolved within weeks without treatment. Severe adverse events were rare, persisting for months and requiring active medical intervention. DISCUSSION: This classification system can enhance understanding, prevention, and treatment of HA filler complications, and support patient education. The common complications were injection site reactions, with persistent symptoms treated with topical steroids, NSAIDs, or hyaluronidase. Severe complications included severe edema, angioedema and others, often necessitating specific treatments. CONCLUSION: HA dermal fillers are generally safe and effective, with most adverse events being transient and mild to moderate in severity. Severe adverse events, although rare, do occur and are generally non-treatment related. Informed consent, patient education, and professional training are crucial for safe and successful outcomes. Level of Evidence II This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Assuntos
Técnicas Cosméticas , Preenchedores Dérmicos , Humanos , Preenchedores Dérmicos/efeitos adversos , Ácido Hialurônico/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Reação no Local da Injeção/etiologia , Injeções Subcutâneas , Estética , Técnicas Cosméticas/efeitos adversosRESUMO
CONTEXT: Antidrug antibodies (ADA) can potentially affect drug pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to evaluate treatment-emergent (TE) ADA in tirzepatide (TZP)-treated participants across 7 phase 3 trials and their potential effect on pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety. METHODS: ADA were assessed at baseline and throughout the study until end point, defined as week 40 (SURPASS-1, -2, and -5) or week 52 (SURPASS-3, -4, Japan-Mono, and Japan-Combo). Samples for ADA characterization were collected at SURPASS trial sites. Participants included ADA-evaluable TZP-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (N = 5025). Interventions included TZP 5, 10, or 15 mg. ADA were detected and characterized for their ability to cross-react with native glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (nGIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (nGLP-1), neutralize tirzepatide activity on GIP and GLP-1 receptors, and neutralize nGIP and nGLP-1. RESULTS: TE ADA developed in 51.1% of tirzepatide-treated patients. Proportions were similar across dose groups. Maximum ADA titers ranged from 1:20 to 1: 81 920 among TE ADA+ patients. Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) against TZP activity on GIP and GLP-1 receptors were observed in 1.9% and 2.1% of patients, respectively. Less than 1.0% of patients had cross-reactive NAb against nGIP or nGLP-1. TE ADA status, ADA titer, and NAb status had no effect on the pharmacokinetics or efficacy of TZP. More TE ADA+ patients experienced hypersensitivity reactions or injection site reactions than TE ADA- patients. The majority of hypersensitivity and injection site reactions were nonserious and nonsevere, and most events occurred and/or resolved irrespective of TE ADA status or titer. CONCLUSION: Immunogenicity did not affect TZP pharmacokinetics or efficacy. The majority of hypersensitivity or injection site reactions experienced by TE ADA+ patients were mild to moderate in severity.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 2 , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Reação no Local da Injeção , Polipeptídeo Inibidor Gástrico/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Peptídeo 1 Semelhante ao Glucagon/uso terapêutico , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Symptoms of hereditary angioedema (HAE) often first occur during childhood, and HAE attacks in children can be severe and substantially affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, there are no approved long-term prophylaxis treatments for children aged less than 6 years. OBJECTIVE: The SPRING Study (NCT04070326) evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of lanadelumab and HRQoL in patients aged 2 to less than 12 years. METHODS: Over 52 weeks of treatment, patients aged 2 to less than 6 years received lanadelumab 150 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) and patients aged 6 to less than 12 years received 150 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) but could switch to Q4W if they were attack-free for 26 weeks. RESULTS: We enrolled 21 patients (aged 2 to less than 6 years: n = 4; aged 6 to less than 12 years: n = 17), 20 of whom completed the study. There were no reported serious treatment-emergent adverse events or discontinuations resulting from such events. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported for 17 patients (81.0%). The most common TEAE was injection site pain. Overall systemic exposure was comparable for both age groups. The mean (SD) attack rate during treatment decreased by 94.8% from baseline (1.84 [1.53] to 0.08 [0.17] attacks/mo), and 16 (76.2%) patients were attack-free. The attack rate reduction in both age groups was similar during the first 26-week fixed-dosing treatment. Seven patients switched from Q2W to Q4W and remained attack-free. A large, clinically meaningful increase in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scale Total Score and a large increase in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scale-Family Impact Module Total Score from baseline to end of study (better HRQoL) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support safety, efficacy, and improved HRQoL with lanadelumab 150 mg Q2W and Q4W regimens for the prevention of HAE attacks in patients aged 2 to less than 12 years.
Assuntos
Angioedemas Hereditários , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Angioedemas Hereditários/tratamento farmacológico , Angioedemas Hereditários/prevenção & controle , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/farmacocinética , Reação no Local da Injeção , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIMS: AP30663 is a novel compound under development for pharmacological conversion of atrial fibrillation by targeting the small conductance Ca2+ activated K+ (KCa2) channel. The aim of this extension phase 1 study was to test AP30663 at higher single doses compared to the first-in-human trial. METHODS: Sixteen healthy male volunteers were randomized into 2 cohorts: 6- and 8-mg/kg intravenous single-dose administration of AP30663 vs. placebo. Safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were collected. RESULTS: AP30663 was associated with mild and transient infusion site reactions with no clustering of other adverse events but with an estimated maximum mean QTcF interval prolongation of 45.2 ms (95% confidence interval 31.5-58.9) in the 6 mg/kg dose level and 50.4 ms (95% confidence interval 36.7-64.0) with 8 mg/kg. Pharmacokinetics was dose proportional with terminal half-life of around 3 h. CONCLUSION: AP30663 in doses up to 8 mg/kg was associated with mild and transient infusion site reactions and an increase of the QTcF interval. Supporting Information support that the QTc effect may be explained by an off-target inhibition of the IKr channel.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Humanos , Masculino , Fibrilação Atrial/induzido quimicamente , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Eletrocardiografia , Frequência Cardíaca , Reação no Local da InjeçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There have been very few real-world studies reported in the literature solely focusing on fremanezumab in Asia. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in a real-world setting in Japan. METHOD: This single-centered, observational, retrospective study examined patients with migraines who received four doses of fremanezumab between December 2021 and August 2022 at Keio University Hospital. We assessed the changes in monthly migraine days, responder rates, and migraine-associated symptoms, as well as injection site reactions and adverse events. RESULT: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled, wherein 79.3% were women. Compared with those at baseline, the monthly migraine days decreased by 5.9 days at 4 months. The 50% responder rate was 55.2% at 4 months. A total of 57.9%, 47.8%, and 65.0% of patients showed improvement in the severity of photophobia, phonophobia, and nausea/vomiting, respectively. Moreover, injection site reactions were the most common adverse events (55.2%). CONCLUSION: Fremanezumab is effective and safe for migraine prevention in Japan. Fremanezumab also improved migraine-associated symptoms in half of the patients.
Assuntos
Reação no Local da Injeção , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Japão/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Método Duplo-Cego , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/diagnósticoRESUMO
Evidence of the immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children aged 6 to 35 months has been emerging. To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children aged 6 to 35 months in a systematic review and meta-analysis. This meta-analysis included 12 studies with 6722 participants receiving QIV, 3575 participants receiving TIV, 4249 participants receiving full-dose QIV (F-QIV), and 3722 participants receiving half-dose QIV (H-QIV). Among children aged 6 to 35 months, QIV produces a better Immunogenicity against influenza B vaccine strains not contained in TIV. However, injection site reaction was more common for QIV, F-QIV showed superior efficacy for the B lineage, but fever and injection site pain was more frequently reported for F-QIV than H-QIV. These data support the immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine among children aged 6 to 35 months.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Humanos , Criança , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vírus da Influenza B , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados , Testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação , Reação no Local da Injeção , Vacinas Combinadas , Imunogenicidade da VacinaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Pegfilgrastim-cbqv (UDENYCA®; Coherus BioSciences, Redwood City, CA, USA) is a pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) biosimilar approved for administration by prefilled syringe (PFS). The recently approved pegfilgrastim-cbqv prefilled autoinjector (AI) was developed as another method of self-administration and to aid in-office use, providing flexibility in drug delivery. The objectives of the study were to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to determine bioequivalence of the prefilled AI and the PFS for administration of pegfilgrastim-cbqv and to assess the safety profile of the prefilled AI. METHODS: During this open-label, two-period crossover study, healthy adult males (N = 155) were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive a subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim-cbqv using a prefilled AI (n = 76) or a PFS (n = 79) in period 1. During period 2, participants received an injection using the other method. Primary PK and secondary PD parameters were calculated to assess the bioequivalence of the treatment as administered by the two delivery methods. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed. RESULTS: The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the PK and PD parameters were within the required range (80-125%), demonstrating bioequivalence between the pegfilgrastim-cbqv prefilled AI and PFS. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 75% and 74.1% of participants in the prefilled AI and PFS groups, respectively. The most common TEAEs in both treatment groups were myalgia, bone pain, and headache. AI-device-related TEAEs were injection site pain (1.4%) and injection site bruising (0.7%). The incidence of antidrug antibodies and neutralizing antibodies was low and was similar in both treatment sequences. CONCLUSIONS: The bioequivalence of pegfilgrastim-cbqv administered using a prefilled AI and a PFS was established. The safety, including immunogenicity profiles, of pegfilgrastim-cbqv administered using the prefilled AI and the PFS were similar, with no new safety findings.
Pegfilgrastim-cbqv is used 2496 h after chemotherapy to prevent febrile neutropenia. This is when a patient has a fever and a lower-than-normal number of white blood cells. Pegfilgrastim-cbqv is also used to treat someone who has a fever and a low number of white blood cells after high radiation exposure (hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome). Pegfilgrastim-cbqv is given as an injection by hand. The syringe is already filled with the drug. The US Food and Drug Administration also approved a prefilled autoinjector as another way to give the drug. The autoinjector is a spring-loaded system that delivers pegfilgrastim-cbqv in less than 10 s. A shield covers the needle before and after the drug is given. The autoinjector is safe and effective for patients to give pegfilgrastim-cbqv to themselves and for health care staff to use in-office. This study looked at whether the way in which pegfilgrastim-cbqv moves through the body (pharmacokinetics) and its effects on the body (pharmacodynamics) were similar in healthy adult males when using a prefilled autoinjector and a prefilled syringe. Side effects were also assessed. The two administration methods had very similar pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic results for pegfilgrastim-cbqv. The side effects for both groups were also similar. The most common side effects were muscle aches and pains, bone pain, and headaches. Giving pegfilgrastim-cbqv with the prefilled autoinjector was very similar to giving it with the prefilled syringe and the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety were similar.
Assuntos
Medicamentos Biossimilares , Seringas , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Equivalência Terapêutica , Estudos Cross-Over , Injeções Subcutâneas , Voluntários Saudáveis , Medicamentos Biossimilares/efeitos adversos , Reação no Local da Injeção , Dor/induzido quimicamenteRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Pegcetacoplan is a targeted complement component 3 (C3) therapy approved for adults with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH; US) or PNH plus anemia despite C5-targeted therapy for ≥ 3 months (EU). Patients with PNH receiving pegcetacoplan in the phase 3 PEGASUS trial who experienced injection site reactions (ISRs) mostly experienced mild events. We evaluated ISR incidence and severity with longer-term treatment in the PEGASUS cohort of the Study 307 open-label extension (307 OLE). METHODS: Patients from PEGASUS enrolled in the 307 OLE continued pegcetacoplan subcutaneous self-administration twice or three times weekly or every 3 days for an additional 48 weeks. ISRs were coded as adverse events (AEs) or treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) and summarized by MedDRA System Organ Class and Preferred Term. RESULTS: As of August 27, 2021, 58/64 patients from PEGASUS completed an additional 48 weeks of treatment in the 307 OLE (median treatment duration 337.0 [range 55-344] days); 95.3% (61/64) of patients achieved compliance ≥ 80%. ISRs occurred in 9/64 (14.1%) patients in the 307 OLE, which was lower than observed at PEGASUS completion (20/77; 26.0%). Most patients with ISRs in the 307 OLE had events with a maximum severity of mild (7/9 patients; 77.8%). Injection site erythema and induration were the most common overall (4/64 patients each; 6.3%) and pegcetacoplan-related (3/64 patients each; 4.7%) ISRs. The exposure-adjusted rates of these events were each 6.5 per 100 patient-years. No ISRs were classified as severe or serious TEAEs or led to drug discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Though ISRs were common, most were mild, and the percentage of patients reporting ISRs declined from PEGASUS through the 307 OLE. Patient compliance remained high, and no patients discontinued because of ISRs, suggesting that ISRs do not pose a barrier to long-term pegcetacoplan treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03500549 (PEGASUS) and NCT03531255 (307 OLE).
Assuntos
Hemoglobinúria Paroxística , Adulto , Humanos , Hemoglobinúria Paroxística/tratamento farmacológico , Reação no Local da InjeçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRPmAbs) have dramatically changed preventive treatment options for patients with migraine. Although there is emerging real-world evidence on the use of CGRPmAbs globally, the change in efficacy and safety after switching between CGRPmAbs owing to patients' frequency of hospital visits preference remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre, retrospective, real-world study of patients with migraine who first received galcanezumab for 3 or 4 months and then switched to fremanezumab at Keio University Hospital. We investigated changes in monthly migraine days (MMD), responder rate, and adverse effects such as injection site reactions. RESULTS: MMD increased only by 0.7 (95% CI, -4.1-5.5; p = 0.748) after 4 months of treatment with fremanezumab (6.1, 95% CI, 2.3-9.9) compared to before switching (5.4, 95% CI, 2.2-8.6). Furthermore, switching from galcanezumab to fremanezumab produced only minor adverse events, such as injection site reactions. CONCLUSIONS: After switching from galcanezumab to fremanezumab out of the desire to visit the hospital less often, the reduction in MMD compared to baseline was sustained, and no serious adverse effects were observed.