Management of Soft Tissue Defects Around Single Implants: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of the available techniques for the management of peri-implant soft tissue defects around single implants in the anterior region. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science (all databases), and Cochrane, using keywords and MeSH terms related to the topic. This systematic review included prospective interventional studies with a minimum of 10 patients and at least 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 13 articles were included, with eight focusing on outcomes related to buccal soft tissue dehiscence coverage procedures and the remaining five investigating interventions aimed at augmenting soft tissue thickness. Coronally advanced flap in combination with connective tissue graft was the most effective technique for buccal soft tissue dehiscence coverage in the medium and long term. In terms of increasing soft tissue thickness, both connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix demonstrated satisfactory short-term outcomes; however, their long-term efficacy remains unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Soft tissue augmentation procedures resulted in satisfactory outcomes, in terms of buccal soft tissue dehiscence coverage and soft tissue thickness increase, around single implants in the esthetic area. Peri-implant plastic surgery has improved both the esthetic appearance and quality of life of patients. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CODE: CRD42023398424.

Functional and Aesthetic Lower Lip Reconstruction With Depressor Anguli Oris Muscle Flap and Reverse Superior Labial Artery Flap.

BACKGROUND: The lower lip is an important anatomical structure involved in daily activities such as eating, drinking, and speaking, as well as in facial expressions. Lower lip defects should be repaired to preserve lip function without disrupting the aesthetic harmony of the lips within the face. This goal is difficult for plastic surgeons because, for functional and aesthetic repair, it is necessary to replace the mucosa, muscle (especially contractile), and skin tissues present in the lip. METHODS: Subtotal lower lip repair was performed using an innervated depressor anguli oris muscle flap and a desepithelialized reverse superior labial artery flap in seven male patients with a mean age of 63 years. A depressor anguli oris muscle flap was used to repair the orbicularis oris muscle defect. The desepithelialized part of the reverse superior labial artery flap was used for mucosal defect repair, whereas the remaining part was used for skin defect repair. Patients were followed up for an average of 15 months. Patient lips, epithelialization, sensation, and sphincter function were clinically evaluated. Electromyography (EMG) was performed at 6 and 12 months to evaluate the function of the depressor anguli oris muscle flap. RESULTS: All the reverse superior labial artery flaps survived without any loss. Trapdoor deformity developed in the flaps of two patients. The desepithelialized parts of the flaps were completely epithelialized (covered with mucosa) by approximately 6th week. In the EMG controls of the patients at 6 months, the depressor anguli oris muscle was contractible. Sensation regained in the operated lip during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of an innervated depressor anguli oris muscle flap and a desepithelialized reverse superior labial artery flap is an important surgical option for the functional and aesthetic repair of subtotal lower lip defects.

Buried filet of limb flaps for the reconstruction of forequarter and hindquarter amputations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Forequarter and hindquarter amputations have traditionally been closed with local tissues, but the technique is plagued by a high rate of complication such as marginal necrosis, seroma, infection, and dehiscence. Filet of limb flaps have been used when local tissues are insufficient for closure, and despite their use in more extensive and complex wounds, outcomes seem to be better in these cases. Recognizing that filet of limb flaps not only serve to cover the wound, but also eliminate dead space, supplement at-risk and/or radiated tissue, pad underlying hard structures, and facilitate neuroma prevention with target muscle reinnervation, we have change our practice to utilize buried filet of limb flaps even when local tissues are technically "sufficient" to close the wound. The purpose of this article to organize and describe the ways in which buried filet-of-limb flaps can be used to achieve important and discrete surgical objectives in forequarter and hindquarter amputation, and to facilitate increased recognition of collaborative interdisciplinary opportunities for spare-part reconstruction. METHODS: Retrospective data from the medical records of seven patients, collected between 2010 to 2023 at our single tertiary referral center, were reviewed. This included all patients for whom a buried (or partially buried) filet of limb flap was attempted for forequarter or hindquarter amputation reconstruction. RESULTS: Five males and two females ranging 55 to 75 years of age, met the inclusion criteria. Three cases of forequarter amputation and four cases of hindquarter amputation were included. Six flaps were successfully transferred without major flap-related complications. The mean follow-up period was eight and a half months. CONCLUSION: Even when local tissues are technically "sufficient" to close forequarter and hindquarter amputation wounds, we have found buried filet of limb flaps to be useful in several ways. These include occupying dead space, providing double-layer coverage, padding hard structures, preventing neuromas, and reconstructing sacro- and spino-pelvic continuity. Our approach emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration and highlights the potential advantages of buried filet of limb flaps in optimizing patient outcomes for complex limb amputations.

Pelvic and Perineal Reconstruction.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Classify types of bony pelvic resections. 2. Outline reconstructive options for pelvic and perineal defects. 3. Identify advantages and drawbacks of various reconstructive techniques. 4. Recognize the functional benefits of bony and soft-tissue reconstruction. SUMMARY: Defects of the pelvis and perineum arise from tumors, trauma, infection, congenital differences, and gender incongruence. Pelvic resections can result in bony instability and soft-tissue deficiency. The goals of reconstruction are maintenance of spinopelvic continuity, elimination of dead space, resurfacing of cutaneous defects, and prevention of hernias. Perineal reconstruction has important functional considerations. Abdominoperineal resection and pelvic exenteration defects benefit from flap reconstruction to decrease pelvic wound complications. Vulvovaginal reconstruction is performed with flaps from the perineum, thigh, or abdomen. Scrotal and superficial penile defects are most commonly reconstructed with scrotal flaps and skin grafts. Total penile reconstruction most commonly uses a radial forearm free flap.

Optimizing Lower Extremity Local Flap Reconstruction in Peripheral Vascular Disease.

BACKGROUND: Local flaps remain a valuable reconstructive tool as a means for limb salvage for patients with advanced arterial disease. Our single-center, retrospective cohort study aims to compare the outcomes of different patterns of blood flow affected by vascular disease to pedicles in local flap reconstruction of the foot and ankle. METHODS: A retrospective review of 92 patients and 103 flaps was performed. On angiograms, pattern of blood flow to the flap pedicle was determined to be direct inline flow (DF) or indirect flow (IF). Patterns of IF were either by arterial-arterial connections (AC) or unnamed randomized collaterals (RC). Primary outcomes were immediate flap success and limb salvage. Comparative analyses were performed using the χ2 and Fisher tests for categorical variables. RESULTS: Among all flaps, 73.8% (n = 76/103) had DF and 26.2% (n = 27/103) had IF. Both groups experienced similar rates of immediate flap success (DF = 97.3% vs IF = 92.6%, P = 0.281) and limb salvage (DF = 75.% vs IF = 66.7%, P = 0.403). However, the rate of contralateral amputation was significantly higher in the IF group (26.9% vs 5.3%, P = 0.006). When comparing the 3 distinct patterns of blood flow (DF vs AC vs RC), pedicled flaps were more commonly supplied by DF and AC, while random pattern flaps were more commonly supplied by RC (P = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Alternative routes of revascularization can maintain local flap viability and achieve similar rates of limb salvage but risks contralateral amputation. We found that pedicled and local muscle flaps require inline blood flow or blood supply by ACs. Meanwhile, random pattern flap can be supported by random collaterals.

The Impact of Increased Body Mass Index on Patient Outcomes and Complications in Microsurgical Lower Extremity Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Elevated body mass index (BMI) is a known perioperative risk factor for complications such as delayed wound healing and infection. However, there is a gap in understanding how elevated BMI impacts outcomes after posttraumatic lower extremity (LE) microvascular reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed at a level 1 trauma center between 2007 and 2022 of patients who underwent posttraumatic microvascular LE reconstruction. Demographics, flap/wound details, complications, and outcomes were recorded. Patients were stratified into BMI Center for Disease Control categories. RESULTS: A total of 398 patients were included with an average BMI of 28.2 ± 5.8. Nearly half (45%) of LE defects were located in the distal third of the leg, 27.5% in the middle third, and 34.4% in the proximal third. Most reconstructions utilized muscle-containing flaps (74.4%) compared with fasciocutaneous flaps (16.8%). Surgical approaches included free flaps (47.6%) and local flaps (52.5%). Class III obese patients were significantly more likely to be nonambulatory than nonobese patients (OR: 4.10, 95% CI 1.10-15.2, p = 0.035). At final follow-up, 30.1% of patients with Class III obesity were ambulatory, requiring either wheelchairs (42.3%) or assistance devices (26.9%). There were no significant differences in complication rates based on obesity status (0.704). The average follow-up time for the entire cohort was 5.8 years. CONCLUSIONS: BMI is critical for patient care and surgical decision-making in LE reconstruction. Further research is warranted to optimize outcomes for higher BMI patients, thereby potentially reducing the burden of postoperative complications and enhancing overall patient recovery.

Modern Oncologic Maxillary Reconstruction.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: (1) Have a broad understanding of the oncological principles relating to cancers involving the maxilla. (2) Define anatomically the various types of maxillectomy defects and their associated morbidity. (3) Understand the goals and principles of maxillary reconstruction. (4) Demonstrate an understanding of the strengths, limitations, and alternative reconstructive options for the various types of maxillectomy defects. SUMMARY: Reconstruction of the maxilla following cancer resection has evolved over the past decade. Underpinned by advances in virtual surgery technology and an increased focus on dental rehabilitation, more sophisticated workflows using free bone flaps have become more commonplace. There are few reconstructions anywhere in the body that require the restoration of similarly intricate bone and soft-tissue relations with implications for both form and function, like the maxilla. Success demands careful anatomical definition of the defect, an understanding of the goals and principles of reconstruction, and the understanding of relative strengths and limitations of the various reconstructive options. Equally, as no one technique is without shortcomings and maxillary surgery can be associated with a significant complication profile, it is just as important to match the patient and oncologic context to the reconstruction. This article is intended to provide the reader with a broad overview of these core factors.

The Lateral Antebrachial Neurocutaneous Flap: Case Series.

BACKGROUND: The neurocutaneous flap was developed based on the understanding that every superficial cutaneous nerve includes vessels, also known as vasa nervorum or paraneural vessels, which run around and inside the nerves and deliver blood to the skin above. A cutaneous perforator connected to paraneural vessels that vascularize the skin and nerves is referred to as a neurocutaneous perforator. The lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LACN), the most dependable blood supply from the primary underlying veins of the neurocutaneous flap, is the subject of this study. METHODS: We reviewed the results of 30 flap coverage procedures in 10 children. The applied flap was based distally along the radial aspect of the hand and wrist. The pivot point of the flap was located dorsally. This study considered patients with posttraumatic tissue loss, vital structure exposure, or hand contractures with an LACN flap. There was a case-by-case assessment. RESULTS: Thirteen male patients were included; their ages ranged from 6 to 65 years. Demographic data, preoperative cause of trauma, and postoperative complications were collected. Statistically significant improvements were observed after flap healing. CONCLUSIONS: The LACN flap is a more versatile flap with less morbidity than other alternative flaps for coverage of soft tissue defect restoration around the hand, wrist, and distal forearm.

Accuracy of the surgical execution of virtually planned deep circumflex iliac artery flaps and their appropriateness for masticatory rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Tumorous diseases of the jaw demand effective treatments, often involving continuity resection of the jaw. Reconstruction via microvascular bone flaps, like deep circumflex iliac artery flaps (DCIA), is standard. Computer aided planning (CAD) enhances accuracy in reconstruction using patient-specific CT images to create three-dimensional (3D) models. Data on the accuracy of CAD-planned DCIA flaps is scarce. Moreover, the data on accuracy should be combined with data on the exact positioning of the implants for well-fitting dental prosthetics. This study focuses on CAD-planned DCIA flaps accuracy and proper positioning for prosthetic rehabilitation. METHODS: Patients post-mandible resection with CAD-planned DCIA flap reconstruction were evaluated. Postoperative radiograph-derived 3D models were aligned with 3D models from the CAD plans for osteotomy position, angle, and flap volume comparison. To evaluate the DCIA flap's suitability for prosthetic dental rehabilitation, a plane was created in the support zone and crestal in the middle of the DCIA flap. The lower jaw was rotated to close the mouth and the distance between the two planes was measured. RESULTS: 20 patients (12 males, 8 females) were included. Mean defect size was 73.28 ± 4.87 mm; 11 L defects, 9 LC defects. Planned vs. actual DCIA transplant volume difference was 3.814 ± 3.856 cm³ (p = 0.2223). The deviation from the planned angle was significantly larger at the dorsal osteotomy than at the ventral (p = 0.035). Linear differences between the planned DCIA transplant and the actual DCIA transplant were 1.294 ± 1.197 mm for the ventral osteotomy and 2.680 ± 3.449 mm for the dorsal (p = 0.1078). The difference between the dental axis and the middle of the DCIA transplant ranged from 0.2 mm to 14.8 mm. The mean lateral difference was 2.695 ± 3.667 mm in the region of the first premolar. CONCLUSION: The CAD-planned DCIA flap is a solution for reconstructing the mandible. CAD planning results in an accurate reconstruction enabling dental implant placement and dental prosthetics.

Comparison of instep and non-instep flap in the reconstruction of the weight-bearing portion of the forefoot and heel.

BACKGROUND: Instep flaps are commonly used for the reconstruction of weight-bearing areas of the foot. However, in cases of large defects or damage to the instep area, non-instep flaps such as reverse sural flaps (RSF) or free anterolateral thigh flaps (ALTF) can be employed. Previous studies have primarily focused on heel reconstruction when comparing different flaps, without considering the forefoot. This study aims to verify the clinical outcomes of these flaps and determine the appropriate donor site for weight-bearing areas of the foot including forefoot reconstruction. METHODS: In a retrospective study, 39 patients who had undergone flap reconstruction of weight-bearing area defects in the foot with a follow-up period of ≥1 year were included. The patients were categorized into two groups: Group A (n = 19) using instep flaps, and Group B (n = 20) using non-instep flap including RSFs and ALTFs. Surgical outcomes were assessed based on the success of the flap, the presence of partial necrosis, the number of additional surgeries, and complications related to the donor site. Clinical evaluation included visual analogue scale (VAS) and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and the occurrence of ulcers. RESULTS: All flaps were successful, while partial necrosis occurred in one case in Group B. There were three reclosures after flap border debridement in both groups and one donor site debridement in Group A. The VAS scores during weight-bearing were 2.0 ± 1.1 and 2.2 ± 1.5 for Groups A and B, respectively (p = .716). The AOFAS scores were 52.8 ± 6.8 and 50.2 ± 12.7 for Groups A and B, respectively (p = .435). The occurrence of ulcers was 0.4 ± 0.9 times for Group A and 0.3 ± 0.7 times for Group B, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = .453). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in clinical outcomes between the types of flaps after reconstruction of the forefoot and hindfoot. Therefore, it is recommended to choose the appropriate flap based on factors such as the size of the defect, its location, and vascular status rather than the type of flap.

Single-staged revascularization and reconstruction after crush injury of the wrist and distal forearm: A protocolized approach.

BACKGROUND: Amputation of the wrist or distal forearm after high-energy trauma due to a crushing mechanism is associated with complex tissue defects, making repair, and reconstruction challenging. Given the difficulty of this type of salvage, patients unfortunately experience a high revision amputation rate. However, a higher quality of life has been reported in patients with successful reconstructions. Herein, we described a protocolized approach for revascularization and reconstruction for functional hand salvage after traumatic amputation from a crushing mechanism using an anterolateral thigh flap (ALT). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed between October 2016 and October 2023 for all patients who underwent single-stage emergent debridement, revascularization, and soft tissue coverage using the ALT after amputation at the level of the wrist or distal forearm secondary to high-energy crush injury. Charts were reviewed for the preoperative Mangled Extremity Salvage Score, intraoperative details including what structures were injured and the reconstructive method performed, and postoperative data such as follow-up duration, outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: Eleven patients met the inclusion criteria with an average age of 35.5 (21-49) years old. The average size of the skin soft tissue defects was 17.3 × 8 cm (range, length: 13-25 cm, width: 6-13 cm), and all cases had associated injury to the underlying bone, nerves, and blood vessels. The average size of the ALT flap used for reconstruction was 19.2 × 9.8 cm (range, length: 14-27 cm, width: 7-15 cm). All patients had survival of the replanted limb. One patient experienced partial flap necrosis that required secondary debridement and skin graft. Nine patients healed without requiring any additional debridement procedures. Patient follow-up averaged 24.6 (12-38) months. All patients achieved satisfactory functional recovery with Grade II to III of Chen's criteria. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with traumatic crush amputation to the wrist with surrounding soft tissue injury, thorough debridement, revascularization, and reconstruction of amputated limbs can be performed in a single stage using the ALT. A protocolized approach from two institutions is presented, demonstrating improved survival and reduced complications of the traumatized limb with improved long-term patient outcomes.

Oronasal Fistula Closure and Defect Reconstruction: Two Case Reports Using Periodontal Plastic Surgery Principles.

OBJECTIVES: Oronasal fistulas are common sequelae following cleft lip and palate surgery and can significantly impact a patient's quality of life. They result from various factors, including surgical techniques, tissue management, and patient-specific factors. This case report explores the modern approach to oronasal fistula closure using periodontal plastic surgery principles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The report presents two cases of patients with oronasal fistulas due to previous maxillofacial surgical intervention. These patients underwent microsurgical procedures that involved partial flap thickness preparation of the fistula areas, the use of connective tissue grafts from the palate, and meticulous suturing techniques to ensure graft integrity. The procedures were performed in stages, and postoperative care was provided. RESULTS: Both cases demonstrated successful fistula closure and graft survival. The patients reported improvements in breathing, speech, aesthetics, and quality of life. The second case also included guided bone regeneration and implant placement. CONCLUSIONS: Oronasal fistulas resulting from maxillofacial surgery can be effectively treated using periodontal plastic surgery techniques, significantly improving patients' quality of life and aesthetic outcomes. This approach represents a valuable addition to the existing repertoire of oronasal fistula closure methods.

What's New in Cleft Palate and Velopharyngeal Dysfunction Management: An Update.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: (1) Describe the pathology of velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) as it relates to patients with a cleft palate. (2) Use the perceptual speech assessment and objective diagnostic tools to determine the presence or absence of VPD. (3) Describe the surgical options available for the treatment of patients with VPD. (4) Develop an evidence-based, customized treatment plan for VPD founded on objective considerations. SUMMARY: To treat patients with cleft palate effectively, the surgeon must understand the diagnosis and surgical management of cleft-associated velopharyngeal dysfunction. The authors review diagnostic modalities including perceptual speech assessment, video nasendoscopy, fluoroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, and nasometry. Surgical treatments including palatal lengthening with buccal myomucosal flaps, conversion Furlow palatoplasty, sphincter pharyngoplasty, and pharyngeal flap are discussed. Selection of an optimal surgical treatment is addressed.