Does early combination vs. Monotherapy improve clinical outcomes of clinically extremely vulnerable patients with COVID-19? Results from a retrospective propensity-weighted analysis.

BACKGROUND: The potential efficacy of early combination therapy, based on an antiviral plus a monoclonal antibody, for COVID-19 in severely immunocompromised patients is matter of debate. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to describe the impact on clinical outcomes of COVID-19 treatments in severely immunocompromised individuals, evaluating differences between a combination and a monotherapy. METHODS: We included severely immunocompromised outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who received an early treatment (either monotherapy with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or remdesivir or the combination of an antiviral plus sotrovimab). We then assessed differences between the two treatment strategies on three main outcomes (30-day mortality, access to emergency department, hospitalization), separately and as a composite by using a propensity score weighted (PSW) approach. RESULTS: Eighty one severely immunocompromised patients were included, 39 receiving early combination therapy and 42 receiving monotherapy. No significant difference was observed in the 30-day mortality rate and hospitalization rate between subjects in the two groups, while access to the emergency department following treatment administration was significantly higher in people who received a combination therapy. After applying the PSW, it was observed that combination therapy impacted favourably on the composite outcome, in a statistically significant fashion. In addition, PSW approach for mortality showed that age was the only significant factor influencing the death as stand-alone outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Early combination therapy showed a favourable impact on a composite outcome (including mortality, hospitalizations and access to emergency department) in severely immunocompromised hosts who were all vaccinated. However, further studies are needed to support our results.

Ritonavir's Evolving Role: A Journey from Antiretroviral Therapy to Broader Medical Applications.

Ritonavir is a protease inhibitor initially developed for HIV treatment that is now used as a pharmacokinetic booster for other antiretrovirals due to it being a cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme and P-glycoprotein inhibitor. Consequently, ritonavir is of special interest for repurposing in other diseases. It had an important role in battling the COVID-19 pandemic as a part of the developed drug Paxlovid® in association with nirmatrelvir and has shown effects in hepatitis and other pathogenic diseases. Ritonavir has also shown promising results in overcoming drug resistance and enhancing the efficacy of existing chemotherapeutic agents in oncology. Evidence of cancer repurposing potential was demonstrated in cancers such as ovarian, prostate, lung, myeloma, breast, and bladder cancer, with several mechanisms of action presented. In vitro studies indicate that ritonavir alone can inhibit key pathways involved in cancer cell survival and proliferation, causing apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and metabolic stress due to the inhibition of molecules like heat shock protein 90 and cyclin-dependent kinases. Ritonavir also causes resistant cells to become sensitized to anticancer drugs like gemcitabine or docetaxel. These findings indicate that repurposing ritonavir, either on its own or in combination with other medications, could be a promising approach for treating various diseases. This is particularly relevant in cancer therapy, where ritonavir repurposing is the central focus of this review.

Real-world analysis of safety, tolerability, and adherence to nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (paxlovid) in primary care COVID-19 outpatients.

This retrospective cross-sectional study aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and adherence of patients prescribed Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) in outpatient settings, focusing on its use in managing category 2 COVID-19 patients across three primary healthcare clinics in Selangor, Malaysia. Data were collected from the Paxlovid pharmacy registry and medical records at Klinik Kesihatan Seksyen 7, Klinik Kesihatan Seksyen 19, and Klinik Kesihatan Kelana Jaya between April 1, 2022, and November 30, 2022. This study analysed data from 415 category 2 COVID-19 patients aged ≥ 18 years. The primary and secondary outcomes included the assessment of patient demographics, Paxlovid dosing, current medication, changes in drug regimen, adherence, and adverse drug reactions (ADR). Pharmacists follow-ups were conducted on days 3 and 5 post-medication initiation. The majority (79.5%) of the cohort experienced ADR, predominantly dysgeusia, diarrhoea, body ache, vomiting, and nausea. Despite this, the ADRs were generally well-tolerated, with no severe impacts reported. High adherence was observed, with 96.9% of patients completing the 5-day regimen. The primary reasons for non-adherence included adverse effect intolerability, dosing ambiguity, forgetfulness, concerns about ADR, and perceived health improvement. Notable medications interacting with Paxlovid were simvastatin, amlodipine, and atorvastatin, and 21.7% of 23 concurrent medications were found not to comply with the recommended interventions by the University of Liverpool COVID-19 Drug Interaction database. Paxlovid demonstrates a high level of safety and tolerability in outpatient COVID-19 patients, with optimal adherence observed. This study underscores the vital role of healthcare professionals in managing Paxlovid within primary healthcare and highlights the need for broader research and direct patient involvement to enhance treatment strategies against COVID-19.

Organising pneumonia due to inadequately cleared COVID-19 infection while on rituximab.

A male patient in his 70s with a history of tobacco use, organising pneumonia and rheumatoid arthritis that had been treated for several years with rituximab currently being treated with tocilizumab, presented with progressively worsening shortness of breath, increasing oxygen requirements and weakness. He had a history of COVID-19 infection 6 months prior to presentation. Initial COVID-19 PCR testing at presentation was negative. Bronchoalveolar lavage was positive for COVID-19 but negative for spike antibodies. It was thought that he did not clear his prior COVID-19 infection due to his immunocompromised state while taking rituximab. On recommendation of infectious disease, he was treated with a prolonged course of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir and corticosteroids with significant symptom improvement.

Nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir reduces COVID-19 hospitalization and prevents long COVID in adult outpatients.

Nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir received Emergency Use Authorization for treating mild to moderate COVID-19 in high-risk patients. Its efficacy against the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 remains uncertain. This retrospective cohort study assessed the effect of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in preventing severe disease progression and long COVID symptoms after acute COVID-19 in non-hospitalized adults. SALAMA medical records from Dubai's COVID-19 healthcare centers between May 22, 2022, and April 30, 2023, were used to identify 7290 eligible patients, 9.6% of whom received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir. Treatment was associated with a notable reduction in COVID-19-related hospitalizations (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] of 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.85) by day 28 of symptom onset. Moreover, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir was associated with fewer long COVID symptoms (adjusted HR of 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19-0.95). This suggests the significant effectiveness of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir against the Omicron variant, reducing both severe and long-term COVID-19 symptoms.

Patient-Reported Adverse Events Among Elderly Patients Receiving Novel Oral COVID-19 Antivirals: A Nationwide Sampled Survey in Korea.

BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of research on the factors linked with adverse events (AEs) associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMVr) and molnupiravir (MOL), particularly in the elderly. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate self-reported AEs and identify factors associated with the occurrence of AEs following NMVr or MOL treatment among survey participants aged 60 years or older in South Korea. METHODS: This nationwide survey was conducted through in-person interviews using structured questionnaires, from July 24 to August 31, 2023. Eligible participants included individuals aged 60 years or older who had been diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and received NMVr or MOL. The study outcomes included self-reported demographic, lifestyle, and health characteristics associated with the occurrence of AEs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of each characteristic in participants with and without AEs. RESULTS: Of the 520 participants, 123 (23.7%) experienced at least one AE with oral COVID-19 treatment: 21.0% (96/458) for NMVr and 43.5% (27/62) for MOL. None of the participants reported any serious AEs. Increased odds of AE occurrence were observed in participants treated with MOL compared to those treated with NMVr (aOR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.67-5.57), a history of two or more compared to one COVID-19 diagnosis (1.93; 1.03-3.62), and self-reported health status as "Unhealthy" compared to "Healthy" (2.65; 1.31-5.36). CONCLUSION: No AEs required further evaluation to change treatment strategies in elderly patients on NMVr or MOL. Several factors, including the use of MOL, history of COVID-19, and reported health status, were associated with an increased incidence of AEs. Both treatments may still be useful choices for patients with non-severe COVID-19 aged 60 years or older. However, close monitoring of unidentified potential harm and further investigation of the factors associated with the occurrence of AEs are needed.

Outcome differences of starting Paxlovid for COVID-19 within or after five days of symptoms onset in the elderly: a retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: The study aimed to compare the outcomes of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir drug combination (Paxlovid) therapy in patients who received treatment within or after five days of COVID-19 confirmed in the elderly. METHODOLOGY: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of older COVID-19 patients (≥ 60 years) admitted from April 7 to May 30, 2022. Patients were categorized into the EP group (starting Paxlovid within five days) and the LP group (starting Paxlovid after five days) following symptoms onset. Length of stay and positive SARS-CoV-2 duration were compared between the two groups. Severe case conversion from mild and moderate COVID-19 patients were also analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 273 patients were included: 137 in the EP group and 136 in the LP group. Compared to the LP group, the EP group had a significantly shorter length of stay (12.4 vs. 14.7 days, p = 0.001) and positive SARS-CoV-2 duration (11.7 vs. 15.8 days, p < 0.001). The EP group had lower severe case conversion (4.4% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.002). Additionally, abnormal IL-6 and lower lymphocyte count indicated increased length of stay. Older age was associated with a decreased risk in SARS-CoV-2 negative test (HR = 0.98) and an increased risk in severe case conversion (OR = 1.11). CONCLUSIONS: Starting Paxlovid within five days of COVID-19 symptoms onset reduced the length of stay and SARS-CoV-2 duration compared to initiating treatment after five days. While severe case conversion among mild COVID-19 patients might be comparable whether starting Paxlovid within or after five days.

Effectiveness and safety of azvudine versus nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in adult patients infected with COVID-19 omicron strains: a retrospective study in Beijing.

The study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of azvudine versus nirmatrelvir-ritonavir against omicron strains of coronavirus disease 2019 infections and determine their comparative effectiveness. This retrospective study included 716 patients who received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NR group) or azvudine (FNC group) at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 1 November 2022 and 27 February 2023. Patients in the FNC group (n = 304) were younger, exhibited less severe symptoms, started antiviral therapy later, received corticosteroids more frequently, and used tocilizumab less frequently than patients in the NR group (n = 412). Within 28 d of therapy, 40 (9.7%) and 20 (6.6%) deaths were in the NR and FNC groups, respectively. No differences were observed between drugs and mortality rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.40-1.5, P = 0.45), clinical improvement (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.79-1.3, P = 0.38), and clinical progression (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.58-1.8, P = 0.96). More patients in the NR group experienced platelet decline than those in the FNC group (17.6% vs. 8.9%, P = 0.034). This study indicated that the effectiveness and safety of azvudine were comparable to those of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir.

Clinical rebound after treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NM/r) is a safe and effective oral antiviral therapeutic used for treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Case reports described a clinical rebound syndrome whereby individuals experience a relapse of symptoms shortly after completing successful treatment. There is a lack of information on frequency of COVID-19 rebound after NM/r in routine clinical care, contributing factors, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed electronic medical records to verify COVID-19 diagnosis, symptoms, and treatment with NM/r from January-June 2022. We defined COVID-19 clinical rebound as clear improvement in symptoms followed by recurrence or worsening of symptoms within 30 days of a five-day course of NM/r. RESULTS: We studied 268 adults with median age 57 (IQR 47, 68), 80% White race, 85% non-Hispanic ethnicity, 55% female, 80% vaccinated and boosted against SARS-CoV-2, and 68% with any co-morbidity. Sixteen (6.0%) of studied patients were determined to have COVID-19 clinical rebound. The median time from starting NM/r to rebound was 11 days (IQR 9, 13). Notable demographic and clinical factors with higher proportion (not statistically significant) among COVID-19 rebound patients were female sex (75% rebound vs. 54.5% no rebound), Black race (12.5% rebound vs. 4.9% no rebound), presence of at least one co-morbidity (81.3% rebound vs. 67.5% no rebound), and lack of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (100% rebound vs. 92.9% no rebound). Only one patient (6.25%) was hospitalized after COVID-19 rebound. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 clinical rebound after treatment with NM/r is mild with favorable outcomes and more common than previously reported from real-world clinical care studies.

Emergence of transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants with decreased sensitivity to antivirals in immunocompromised patients with persistent infections.

We investigated the impact of antiviral treatment on the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 resistance during persistent infections in immunocompromised patients (n = 15). All patients received remdesivir and some also received nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (n = 3) or therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (n = 4). Sequence analysis showed that nine patients carried viruses with mutations in the nsp12 (RNA dependent RNA polymerase), while four had viruses with nsp5 (3C protease) mutations. Infectious SARS-CoV-2 with a double mutation in nsp5 (T169I) and nsp12 (V792I) was recovered from respiratory secretions 77 days after initial COVID-19 diagnosis from a patient sequentially treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and remdesivir. In vitro characterization confirmed its decreased sensitivity to remdesivir and nirmatrelvir, which was overcome by combined antiviral treatment. Studies in golden Syrian hamsters demonstrated efficient transmission to contact animals. This study documents the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 carrying resistance mutations to both nirmatrelvir and remdesivir from a patient and demonstrates its transmissibility in vivo.

A SONAR report on Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir-associated rebound COVID-19: Using new databases for evaluating new diseases.

INTRODUCTION: In May 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention disseminated an alert advising that "a few" persons with Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NM/R)-associated rebound of COVID-19 infection had been identified. Three case reports appearing as pre-print postings described the first cases. Analyses in March 2023 by NM/R's manufacturer and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported no association between NM/R and COVID-19 rebound in a large phase 3 randomized clinical trial. Our study evaluated if social media databases or electronically disseminated new articles might provide insights related to the putative new toxicity, NM/R-associated COVID-19 rebound. METHODS: Information on NM/R-associated COVID-19 rebound cases was abstracted from preprint postings of non-peer-reviewed manuscripts, social media websites, electronically disseminated print and television media reports, a new FDA adverse event database for drugs that received Emergency Use Approval, and news articles in scientific journals. RESULTS: Thirty-five persons experienced presumed or documented NM/R-associated COVID-19 rebound, based on information described in preprint services (n = 27), Twitter postings and related news articles (n = 7), and news articles without related Twitter reports (n = 1). These reports included information on dates of initial COVID-19 illness and rebound onset, COVID-19 testing, vaccine status, presentation, and outcome. A new FDA safety database identified 12,500 possible cases of this toxicity, but the quality of these data was poor. Preprint postings preceded peer-reviewed publications describing the same cases by four months. Social media websites including Instagram, Reddit, YouTube, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Health Alert Network, CDC Twitter, and Facebook did not provide clinically meaningful information on individual cases. CONCLUSION: Preprint services and Twitter facilitated identification of the largest case series of NM/R-associated COVID-19 rebound. The cases were reported in non-peer-reviewed media several weeks prior to the first peer-reviewed electronically disseminated publication of one person with this diagnosis.

Pooled analysis of the MANTICO2 and MONET randomized controlled trials comparing drug efficacy for early treatment of COVID-19 during Omicron waves.

BACKGROUND: The clinical effectiveness of early therapies for mild-to-moderate COVID-19, comparing antivirals and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) during the Omicron era, has not been conclusively assessed through a post-approval comparative trial. We present a pooled analysis of two randomized clinical trials conducted during Omicron waves. METHODS: The MANTICO2/MONET trial is a pooled analysis of two multicentric, independent, phase-4, three-arm, superiority, randomized, open-label trials. Nonhospitalized patients with early mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (≤5 days after symptoms' onset) and at least one risk factor for disease progression were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 500 mg of intravenous sotrovimab (SOT) or 600 mg of intramuscular tixagevimab/cilgavimab (TGM/CGM) or oral 5-days course of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/r) 300/100 mg BID. Primary outcome was COVID-19-related hospitalization or death within 29 days after randomization. Fisher's exact test for pooled data and incidence of failure was reported as overall and by arm with respective 95% CI. Pairwise comparisons across the arms were conducted using unadjusted exact logistic regression. An analysis by means of a doubly robust marginal model using augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) was also conducted to estimate the potential outcomes (Pom) in each treatment group and their difference by the average treatment effect (ATE). Analysis of symptom persistence within 30 days after randomization was performed using a 2-level hierarchical mixed-effects logistic model with a random intercept at the patient's level. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals were adjusted for age and sex and calculated using ANOVA-like methods for the mixed effects logistic model. These trials are registered with the European Clinical Trials Database, EudraCT2021-002612-31 (MANTICO2) and EudraCT2021-004188-28 (MONET) and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05321394 (MANTICO2). FINDINGS: Between March 2022 and February 2023, 991 patients (SOT = 332, TGM/CGM = 327, NMV/r = 332) were enrolled in 15 Italian centers. The overall mean age was 66 years; 482 participants (48.80%) were male, and 856 were vaccinated with at least a primary course (86%). Among the 8/991 hospitalizations observed, one resulted in death. The overall estimate of failure was 0.81% (95%CI; 0.35-1.58%). The odds ratio (OR) for the primary outcome in the NMV/r arm compared to the TGM/CGM and SOT arms was 8.41 (95% CI 1.21 to infinity; p = 0.015) and 2.42 (95% CI 0.19 to infinity; p = 0.499), respectively. No significant difference was observed between SOT and TGM/CGM (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.032-1.83; p = 0.174). Results were similar when we applied the marginal weighted model accounting for potential residual confounding bias. There was no evidence for a difference in the prevalence of symptoms between treatment groups, except for cough, which was higher in the SOT group compared to the other two groups at the 21-day follow-up (P = 0.039) and a higher prevalence of nausea at the 7-day follow-up in the NMV/r group compared to the mAbs group (p = 0.036). INTERPRETATION: NMV/r was superior to TGM/CGM in reducing hospital admission or death in clinically vulnerable patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection treated within 5 days of symptoms' onset. No significant difference in symptom prevalence over time across the arms was found.

Paxlovid for the treatment of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) is a new oral antiviral drug that is used for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is administered to patients with mild to moderate disease for five consecutive days. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Paxlovid in COVID-19 patients. METHODOLOGY: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant publications up to 9 March 2023. Three randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, one prospective cohort study, and 25 retrospective cohort studies were identified for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the Paxlovid and control groups in terms of hospitalization (RR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.24-0.69, p < 0.001), all-cause mortality (RR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.27-0.50, p < 0.001), hospitalization or death (RR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.37-0.67, p < 0.001), intensive care unit admission (RR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.27-0.73, p = 0.001), and emergency department visits (RR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.54-0.83, p < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of COVID-19 rebound (OR = 1.18; 95% CI: 0.82-1.68, p = 0.37). In addition, the Paxlovid group had a significantly shorter hospital length of stay (weighted mean difference WMD = -1.11; 95% CI, -1.81, -0.41; I2 > 50%, p < 0.05), and polymerase chain reaction negative conversion time (WMD = -2.75; 95% CI, -3.60, -1.89, I2 > 50%, p < 0.05) than that of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Paxlovid can be considered an effective therapeutic agent for treating patients with COVID-19.

Antiviral therapy for COVID-19 virus: A narrative review and bibliometric analysis.

The COVID-19 epidemic has become a major international health emergency. Millions of people have died as a result of this phenomenon since it began. Has there been any successful pharmacological treatment for COVID-19 since the initial report on the virus? How many searches are undertaken to address the impact of the infection? What is the number of drugs that have undergone investigation? What are the mechanisms of action and adverse effects associated with the investigated pharmaceuticals used to treat COVID-19? Has the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved any medication to treat COVID-19? To date, our understanding is based on a restricted corpus of published investigations into the treatment of COVID-19. It is important to note that no single study comprehensively encompasses all pharmacological interventions for COVID-19. This paper provides an introductory summary of a bibliometric analysis conducted on the data about COVID-19, sourced explicitly from two platforms, namely PubMed and ScienceDirect. The analysis encompasses the period spanning from 2019 to 2022. Furthermore, this study examines the published literature about the pharmacological interventions for the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), explicitly focusing on the safety and effectiveness of different medications such as Remdesivir (marketed as Veklury®), Lopinavir/Ritonavir (commercially known as Kaletra® or Aluvia®), Ribavirin, Favipiravir (marketed as Avigan®), Ivermectin, Casirivimab and Imdevimab (branded as Ronapreve®), Sotrovimab (marketed as Xevudy®), Anakinra, Molnupiravir, Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir (marketed as Paxlovid®), and Galidesivir. Findings indicate that while Remdesivir and Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir show significant efficacy in reducing hospitalization and severe outcomes, drugs like Lopinavir/Ritonavir and Ivermectin have inconsistent results. Our insights suggest a multifaceted approach incorporating these therapies can significantly improve patient outcomes. Repurposing drugs has been critical in rapidly responding to COVID-19, allowing existing medications to be used in new ways to combat the virus. Combination therapies and further research are essential to optimize treatment strategies.

Prevalence of Potential Drug Interactions With Direct-Acting Antivirals for COVID-19 Among Hospitalized Patients.

PURPOSE: Clinicians consider polypharmacy, comorbidities, and other factors including the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) when evaluating therapeutic options for specific clinical diagnoses. Contemporary treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) includes direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). We sought to characterize patients' characteristics, comorbidities, and medications received during their hospitalization for COVID-19 and quantify potential DDIs that clinicians consider in selecting appropriate DAAs. METHODS: Patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 between May 2020 and December 2022 from the PINC AI Healthcare Database were identified. Medications administered during the hospitalization with the potential to cause DDIs with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir, or molnupiravir (per the Emergency Use Authorization factsheet or package insert) were assessed. For DDIs with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, medications are categorized as "Contraindicated," "Avoid Concomitant Use," or "Other DDIs" (includes recommendation for dose modification or clinical and laboratory monitoring). For remdesivir, coadministration with chloroquine phosphate and hydroxychloroquine sulfate was not recommended. For molnupiravir, no drugs are listed as having potential DDIs. In a subset of patients, a multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine the association between documented patient/hospital characteristics and the likelihood of being "Contraindicated" to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. FINDINGS: Of the 788,238 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in 920 hospitals, 53% were ≥ 65 years old, and 31% had Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 3. During the study period, about half of the patients received medications categorized as "Contraindicated" (11%) and/or "Avoid Concomitant Use" (41%) with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. The frequency of administered drugs was higher in those aged ≥ 65 years (68%), CCI ≥ 3 (78%), with high-risk underlying conditions (55%). About 1% of patients received medications that were not recommended to be coadmistered with remdesivir. Among a subset of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in 2022, those who were older, had higher CCI, high-risk underlying conditions, severe hepatic impairment, Medicare insurance, and hospitalized in larger hospitals were significantly more likely to be categorized as "Contraindicated" when considering nirmatrelvir/ritonavir as a therapeutic option to manage COVID-19. IMPLICATIONS: A significant proportion of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 receive medications for other conditions that have the potential to result in DDIs with DAAs; most predominantly with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, a strong CYP3A enzyme inhibitor, fewer with remdesivir, and none with molnupiravir. Higher age and comorbidity burden were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of receiving medications that are "Contraindicated" with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. In the evolving COVID-19 era, these findings provide insights into patients hospitalized for COVID-19, and the polypharmacy evaluations that clinicians may encounter when selecting among DAAs to manage COVID-19.

The effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir regimen in hospitalized renal transplant patients with prolonged COVID-19 infection: a multicenter clinical experience.

OBJECTIVES: Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) infected COVID-19 for more than 5 days has not been evaluated. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, 85 KTRs with COVID-19 were enrolled, including 50 moderate, 21 severe, and 14 critical patients. RESULTS: The median time from onset to starting NR treatment was 14 (IQR, 11-19) days. Before NR treatment, 96.5% patients reduced use of antimetabolites. They also stopped using calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) 12-24 hours before NR treatment, with CNI concentrations well-controlled during NR treatment. The use of intravenous corticosteroids increased with COVID-19 severity. The median time to reach viral negative conversion was 5 (IQR, 4-8) days for all patients. For moderate and severe COVID-19 patients, they had a low rate of ICU admission (1.4%), exacerbation requiring upgraded oxygen therapy (5.6%), and dialysis (2.8%); no intubation and mechanical ventilation, and no deaths were observed. Patients with critical COVID-19 had a low mortality rate (7.1%). CONCLUSIONS: A regimen including NR for clearing SARS-CoV-2 along with reducing immunosuppressants and using intravenous corticosteroids is associated with lower rates of exacerbation and mortality in KTRs who have moderate to critical SARS-CoV-2 infection and the virus still present after 5 days.

Antiviral Effectiveness, Clinical Outcomes, and Artificial Intelligence Imaging Analysis for Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Receiving Antivirals.

INTRODUCTION: There is still a lack of clinical evidence comprehensively evaluating the effectiveness of antiviral treatments for COVID-19 hospitalized patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Beijing You'An Hospital, focusing on patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or azvudine. The study employed a tripartite analysis-viral dynamics, survival curve analysis, and AI-based radiological analysis of pulmonary CT images-aiming to assess the severity of pneumonia. RESULTS: Of 370 patients treated with either nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or azvudine as monotherapy, those in the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir group experienced faster viral clearance than those treated with azvudine (5.4 days vs. 8.4 days, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the survival curves between the two drug groups. AI-based radiological analysis revealed that patients in the nirmatrelvir group had more severe pneumonia conditions (infection ratio is 11.1 vs. 5.35, p = 0.007). Patients with an infection ratio higher than 9.2 had nearly three times the mortality rate compared to those with an infection ratio lower than 9.2. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that in real-world studies regarding hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, the antiviral effect of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is significantly superior to azvudine, but the choice of antiviral agents is not necessarily linked to clinical outcomes; the severity of pneumonia at admission is the most important factor to determine prognosis. Additionally, our findings indicate that pulmonary AI imaging analysis can be a powerful tool for predicting patient prognosis and guiding clinical decision-making.

Treatment of persistent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia patient with using nirmatrelvir/ritonavir extended course: A case report.

Patients with hematological malignancies are at increased risk of persistent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, a unique clinical condition, for which the optimal treatment is unknown. Here we report a case of persistent COVID-19 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patient who successfully responded to extended course nirmatrelvir/ritonavir.