Relationship between serum albumin level and hospitalization duration following percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome.

Low serum albumin levels increase coronary morbidity, mortality, and postoperative cardiovascular risk. Therefore, this study investigated the relationship between these levels and the length of hospital stay in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome. A total of 350 patients were divided into quartiles according to serum albumin levels. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the length of hospital stay. A non-linear regression analysis of serum albumin and length of hospital stay was also performed. The results of the multifactorial analysis revealed low serum albumin levels as an independent predictor of longer hospital stay, even in the fully adjusted model. In the segmented linear regression model, serum albumin level showed a U-shaped relationship with the length of hospital stay. In conclusion, low serum albumin level was an independent predictor of longer hospital stay in patients undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndrome, with shorter stays observed for increasing serum albumin levels. Low serum albumin can be used to identify patients who require longer hospitalization and may need additional nutritional support or interventions to improve their prognosis.

Optimal medical therapy, clinical outcome and its predictors in patients with acute coronary syndrome after discharge with secondary prevention medications at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North West Ethiopia, 2023: A retrospective follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: The life-threatening diseases known as ACS (acute coronary syndrome) continue to produce considerable rates of morbidity and mortality despite breakthroughs in therapy. The study determined clinical outcome and its predictors in patients at the University of Gondar Comprehensive and Specialized Hospital (UOGCSH), North West Ethiopia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study design was employed at UOGCSH from January 31, 2018 to February 1, 2023. The hospital used a systematic random sampling procedure to select study participants from the medical records of patients in chronic cardiac follow-up clinics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Exposures were optimal medical therapy (OMT) versus non-optimal medical therapy collected from May to August 2023. Descriptive and analytical statistics were employed to compare study groups. A binary logistic regression model was employed to identify candidate variables for further analysis. Cox's proportional hazard model and log-rank test were employed, with a P-value < 0.05 used to evaluate statistical significance. A five-year all-cause mortality after discharge estimate was displayed by using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Among 422 patients with ACS [mean age, 61.56 (SD = 9.686) years; 54.7% male], of whom only 59.2% (250) received optimal medical therapy at discharge. Age ≥ 65, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney diseases, and cardiogenic shock were negative independent predictors of optimal medical therapy. On the other hand, male sex was independently associated with the use of optimal medical therapy. All-cause mortality occurred in 16.6% (n = 70) and major adverse cardiac events occurred in 30.8% (n = 130) of patients with a 95% CI of 0.132-0.205 and 0.264-0.355, respectively. Multivariate analyses indicated that OMT was significantly associated with reduced all-cause mortality (aHR: 0.431, 95% CI: 0.222-0.835; P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that the use of preventive OMT in patients discharged with acute coronary syndrome was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality. However, the use of this OMT is suboptimal.

Aspirin Desensitization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Patient with Aspirin Hypersensitivity and Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Case Report.

Hypersensitivity to aspirin is rare disorder occurring in 1.88% of the patients. Aspirin-hypersensitive patients requiring single antiplatelet agent may be treated with clopidogrel, an alternative antiplatelet agent. However, aspirin desensitization is more cost-effective than the usage of clopidogrel in these patients. Furthermore, aspirin desensitization is of greater value in patients requiring dual antiplatelet therapy, for example following procedures like percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) instead of using non-aspirin-based combinations. Herein, we report a 74-year-old hypertensive male presented with features of acute coronary syndrome and planned for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of RCA followed by dual antiplatelet therapy. Since he had aspirin allergy, desensitization was done using rapid desensitization protocol for which he responded well. This case highlights the importance of aspirin-desensitization in patients with aspirin allergy instead of choosing non-aspirin based antiplatelet agents.

Assessment, Management and Quality of Care of Patients Presenting with Non-Traumatic Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Room who had Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Non-traumatic Acute Chest pain (NTACP) is a common presentation in the emergency services of many hospitals and a key presenting symptom of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, there is a dearth of data on the system of care of ACS patients in our facilities. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the process of care of patients presenting with NTACP at a Tertiary Hospital emergency department (ED) in sub-Saharan Africa, using quality indicators of a universal chain of survival to identify any care gaps in the diagnosis and management of those with life-threatening ACS. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of adult patients ≥18 years of age, seen between July 2020 and June 2023 at the ED of the University College Hospital (UCH), Ibadan, Nigeria. We used this information to determine the frequency of ACS amongst those presenting with NTACP. From this subset, we assessed the main domains of quality indicators of the universal chain of survival in ACS care. These were, early symptom recognition and call for help; emergency medical service (EMS) evaluation and treatment; ED evaluation and treatment; and reperfusion therapy. RESULTS: We assessed a total of 4,306 patients who presented to the ED during the study period. Of these, 225 patients presented with NTACP. The mean ± SD age of these patients was 45.9 ± 18.4 years, with most between the ages of 40-49 years (20.9%) and males (50.7%). More than 80% of the patients presented to ED 12 hours after the onset of chest pain. Only 4.0% presented via an ambulance service which offered no prehospital guideline-directed medical treatment, and 70.7% were non-referred patients. Only 37.3%, 57.8%, 12.4%, and 8.9% had ECG, chest x-ray, echocardiography, and cardiac enzyme evaluation, respectively, in the acute phase of care. There were 29 (12.9%) patients who had a diagnosis of ACS. Two (6.9%) had medical revascularization with thrombolytic agents, while 8 (27.6%) and 19 (65.5%) were referred for primary and secondary PCI respectively. CONCLUSION: We found a high burden of late presentation and significant barriers to recommended guideline management of ACS patients, presenting with clinical features of NTACP in our hospital's ED.

CONTEXTE: La douleur thoracique aiguë non traumatique (NTACP) est une présentation courante dans les services d'urgence de nombreux hôpitaux et un symptôme clé du syndrome coronarien aigu (SCA). Cependant, il y a peu de données sur le système de soins des patients atteints de SCA dans nos établissements. OBJECTIF: Notre objectif était d'évaluer le processus de prise en charge des patients présentant une NTACP dans un service d'urgence d'un hôpital tertiaire en Afrique subsaharienne, en utilisant des indicateurs de qualité de la chaîne universelle de survie pour identifier les lacunes dans le diagnostic et la gestion de ceux présentant un SCA potentiellement mortel. MÉTHODES: Il s'agit d'une étude rétrospective transversale sur des patients adultes âgés de ≥18 ans, vus entre juillet 2020 et juin 2023 aux urgences de l'Hôpital Universitaire de l'Université d'Ibadan (UCH), Nigeria. Nous avons utilisé ces informations pour déterminer la fréquence du SCA parmi ceux présentant une NTACP. À partir de ce sous-ensemble, nous avons évalué les principaux domaines des indicateurs de qualité de la chaîne universelle de survie dans les soins du SCA. Ces domaines comprenaient la reconnaissance précoce des symptômes et l'appel à l'aide, l'évaluation et le traitement par les services médicaux d'urgence (SMU), l'évaluation et le traitement aux urgences, et la thérapie de reperfusion. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons évalué un total de 4 306 patients qui se sont présentés aux urgences au cours de la période d'étude. Parmi eux, 225 patients présentaient une NTACP. L'âge moyen ± écart-type de ces patients était de 45,9 ± 18,4 ans, la plupart ayant entre 40 et 49 ans (20,9%) et étant des hommes (50,7%). Plus de 80% des patients se sont présentés aux urgences 12 heures après le début de la douleur thoracique. Seulement 4,0% sont arrivés via un service d'ambulance qui n'a pas offert de traitement médical préhospitalier dirigé par des lignes directrices, et 70,7% étaient des patients non référés. Seuls 37,3%, 57,8%, 12,4% et 8,9% ont eu un ECG, une radiographie thoracique, une échocardiographie et une évaluation des enzymes cardiaques, respectivement, dans la phase aiguë des soins. Vingt-neuf patients (12,9%) ont été diagnostiqués avec un SCA. Deux (6,9%) ont subi une revascularisation médicale avec des agents thrombolytiques, tandis que 8 (27,6%) et 19 (65,5%) ont été référés pour une ICP primaire et secondaire, respectivement. CONCLUSION: Nous avons constaté une forte prévalence de présentation tardive et des obstacles significatifs à la gestion recommandée par les lignes directrices des patients atteints de SCA, se présentant avec des caractéristiques cliniques de NTACP dans les urgences de notre hôpital. MOTS CLÉS: Qualité des soins, Douleur thoracique non traumatique, Syndrome coronarien aigu, Troponines, Reperfusion, Intervention coronarienne percutanée, Département/salle d'urgence, Protocoles de diagnostic, Assurance santé.

Antiplatelet Strategy for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Optimal duration and choice of antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remain controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Digital databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase) were queried to select all randomized controlled trials on a post-percutaneous coronary intervention population with acute coronary syndrome. Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel for 12 months was compared with 4 major strategies: high-potency, high- to low-potency, low-dose, and short-duration DAPT. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare the safety and efficacy of different antiplatelet strategies. This study was the second updated manuscript under the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review registration (CRD42021286552). Thirty-two randomized controlled trials comprising 103 459 (51 750 experimental, 51 709 control) patients were included. Compared with DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel for 12 months, high- to low-potency DAPT (risk ratio [RR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.52-0.92]) and aspirin+prasugrel containing DAPT for 12 months (RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72-0.98]) had a significantly lower, whereas DAPT for 1 month followed by clopidogrel only (RR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.06-2.39]) had a higher, incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year (median follow-up). Prasugrel (RR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.09-1.66]) and ticagrelor (RR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.17-1.62]) containing DAPT for 12 months had significantly higher rates, whereas high- to low-potency DAPT (RR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.63-1.15]) had no significant risk of major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin and ticagrelor for 3 months, followed by aspirin and clopidogrel for the remaining duration, can be considered the optimal strategy for treating post-percutaneous coronary intervention patients with acute coronary syndrome because of a significantly reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events without increasing the risk of bleeding.

Increased CD14+HLA-DR-/low myeloid-derived suppressor cells can be regarded as a biomarker on disease severity and response to therapy in acute coronary syndrome.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the dynamic changes in monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSCs) and their implications in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), shedding light on potential therapeutic targets. Experimental Design: Peripheral blood samples were collected from 68 ACS patients, 35 stable angina pectoris (SAP) patients, and 30 healthy controls (HC). Multi-parameter flow cytometry was employed for analysis of M-MDSCs, explored with disease characteristics and progression. Results: ACS patients exhibited an increased frequency of circulating M-MDSCs compared to SAP patients and HC. M-MDSCs levels demonstrated associations with ACS type, coronary artery lesions, multi-vessel disease, and cardiac dysfunction severity. Higher M-MDSCs levels were found in obese patients. Notably, therapy led to a significant decrease in M-MDSCs frequency. Furthermore, ACS patients exhibited elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in the cytokine profile associated with M-MDSCs. Increased expression of arginase-1(Arg-1) was observed in ACS patients, with positive correlations between M-MDSCs levels and IL-6, GM-CSF, and Arg-1 expression. The diagnostic performance of triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and M-MDSCs levels varied in predicting the severity of coronary artery stenosis, with TG showing higher specificity, HDL-C displaying higher sensitivity, and M-MDSCs levels demonstrating balanced sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: Assessment of M-MDSCs frequency holds promise as a predictive marker for disease progression and therapy response of coronary artery stenosis. The elevated presence of M-MDSCs suggests their potential role in modulating ACS-related inflammation.

Association between kidney function, frailty and receipt of invasive management after acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is associated with lower use of invasive management and increased mortality after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The reasons for this are unclear. METHODS: A retrospective clinical cohort study was performed using data from the English National Institute for Health Research Health Informatics Collaborative (2010-2017). Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate whether eGFR<90 mL/min/1.73 m2 was associated with conservative ACS management and test whether (a) differences in care could be related to frailty and (b) associations between eGFR and mortality could be related to variation in revascularisation rates. RESULTS: Among 10 205 people with ACS, an eGFR of <60 mL/min/1.73m2 was found in 25%. Strong inverse linear associations were found between worsening eGFR category and receipt of invasive management, on a relative and absolute scale. People with an eGFR <30 mL compared with ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2 were half as likely to receive coronary angiography (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.64) after non-ST-elevation (NSTE)-ACS and one-third as likely after STEMI (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.46), resulting in 15 and 17 per 100 fewer procedures, respectively. Following multivariable adjustment, the ORs for receipt of angiography following NSTE-ACS were 1.05 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.27), 0.98 (95% CI 0.77 to 1.26), 0.76 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.01) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.77) in eGFR categories 60-89, 45-59, 30-44 and <30, respectively. After STEMI, the respective ORs were 1.20 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.71), 0.77 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.24), 0.33 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.56) and 0.28 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.48) (p<0.001 for linear trends). ORs were unchanged following adjustment for frailty. A positive association between the worse eGFR category and 30-day mortality was found (test for trend p<0.001), which was unaffected by adjustment for frailty. CONCLUSIONS: In people with ACS, lower eGFR was associated with reduced receipt of invasive coronary management and increased mortality. Adjustment for frailty failed to change these observations. Further research is required to explain these disparities and determine whether treatment variation reflects optimal care for people with low eGFR. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03507309.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on time to treatment, treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Yogyakarta, Indonesia with respect to time to treatment, treatment pattern and treatment outcome. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study in which medical records of hospitalised patients with ACS were reviewed. SETTING: Three hospitals in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. PARTICIPANTS: Patients hospitalised with ACS during two pandemic periods (first pandemic period: March-August 2020; second pandemic period: March-August 2021) and prepandemic period (March-August 2019). OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to treatment, treatment pattern and treatment outcome. RESULTS: A total of 598 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 615 with non-ST-elevation ACS were identified. Of these, 313, 484 and 416 were identified during the prepandemic period, first pandemic period and second pandemic period, respectively. For STEMI, the proportion of patients with a delay from symptom onset to first medical contact (FMC) was significantly higher during the second pandemic period as compared with the prepandemic period (47.7% vs 32.0%, OR=1.84, 95% CI 1.18, 2.85). The proportion of patients with STEMI with delayed door-to-balloon (D2B) time was significantly higher during the second pandemic period as compared with the prepandemic period (99.4% vs 92.9%, OR=13.08, 95% CI 1.57, 108.73). Significantly longer mean total ischaemic time (45.85 hours vs 30.29 hours, mean difference=14.56, 95% CI 1.85, 27.28) was observed among patients with STEMI during the second year of the pandemic as compared with the prepandemic period. No significant differences between the prepandemic period and the first pandemic period were found in terms of proportion of patients with STEMI with a delay in time from symptom onset to FMC, delayed D2B time and total ischaemic time. Only Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score (OR=1.04, 95% CI 1.03, 1.05) was a significant predictor of in-hospital mortality in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on time to treatment among patients with ACS. Health systems need to be well prepared to support effective and timely treatment of patients with ACS during future crisis.

The role of chronic total occlusions in non-infarct-related arteries in acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review.

Aim: This systematic review evaluated the impact of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) in a non-infarct-related artery (non-IRA) on clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients and assessed the benefits of staged revascularization.Methods: We performed a comprehensive systematic review to provide further insight into the impact of a CTO in a non-IRA on clinical outcomes after ACS. Moreover, we review the currently available evidence on the clinical significance of staged revascularization for a CTO in a non-IRA patients with ACS and propose whether prophylactic CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) could improve outcomes in patients who subsequently develop an ACS.Results: Our search identified 999 studies, from which 30 were selected and ten were included in the analysis. The results showed a trend of higher all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac event rates in the culprit-only-PCI group compared with the multivessel (MV)-PC I group in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients, with varying statistical significance across different outcomes.Conclusion: This review highlights the significant impact of non-IRA CTOs in ACS. Successful CTO revascularization may provide benefits, particularly in ST elevation myocardial infarction, but the optimal management approach remains uncertain. The presence of a non-IRA CTO, especially in cardiogenic shock, predicts worse outcomes. Further research is warranted to determine the effective strategies to improve survival.

Heart attacks occur when blood flow to the heart is blocked. Some people have a long-standing complete blockage in a heart artery, called a chronic total occlusion (CTO). This review examined studies on heart attack patients, who also had a CTO in a different artery.The review found that having a CTO makes heart attacks more dangerous, increasing the risk of serious complications or death. Treating the CTO might benefit some patients, potentially reducing future heart problems. However, the optimal timing for CTO treatment remains unclear, some doctors prefer immediate treatment, while others advocate waiting.For very sick heart attack patients in cardiogenic shock, a CTO further increases risks. These patients may require specialized treatments to support heart function.Although fixing CTOs might help, more research is needed to determine their effectiveness for all patients. Currently, treatment decisions are made based on each patient's situation.In conclusion, CTOs pose a significant challenge in heart attack treatment. Further studies are necessary to establish the safest and most effective approach for managing heart attack patients with CTOs.

Temporal trends in concordance between ICD-coded and cardiac biomarker-classified hospitalisation rates for acute coronary syndromes: a linked hospital and biomarker data study.

BACKGROUND: Since 2000, the definition of myocardial infarction (MI) has evolved with reliance on cardiac troponin (cTn) tests. The implications of this change on trends of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) subtypes obtained from routinely collected hospital morbidity data are unclear. Using person-linked hospitalisation data, we compared International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-coded data with biomarker-classified admission rates for ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI), non-STEMI (NSTEMI) and unstable angina (UA) in Western Australia (WA). METHODS: We used linked hospitalisation data from all WA tertiary hospitals to identify patients with a principal diagnosis of STEMI, NSTEMI or UA between 2002 and 2016. Linked biomarker results were classified as 'diagnostic' for MI according to established criteria. We calculated age-standardised and sex-standardised rates (ASSRs) for ICD-coded versus biomarker-classified admissions by ACS subtypes and estimated annual change in admissions using Poisson regression adjusting for age and sex. RESULTS: There were 37 272 ACS admissions in 30 683 patients (64.2% male), and 96% of cases had linked biomarker data, predominantly conventional cTn at the start and high-sensitive cTn from late 2013. Despite lower ASSRs, trends in MI classified with a diagnostic biomarker were concordant with ICD-coded admissions rates for both STEMI and NSTEMI. Between 2002 and 2010, STEMI rates declined by 4.1% (95% CI 5.0%, 3.1%) and 3.4% (95% CI 4.6%, 2.3%) in ICD-coded and biomarker-classified admissions, respectively, and both plateaued thereafter. For NSTEMI between 2002 and 2010, the ICD-coded and biomarker-classified rates increased 8.0% per year (95% CI 7.2%, 8.9%) and 8.0% (95% CI 7.0%, 9.0%), respectively, and both subsequently declined. For UA, both ICD-coded and biomarker-classified UA admission rates declined in a steady and concordant manner between 2002 and 2016. CONCLUSIONS: The present study supports the validity of using administrative data to monitor population trends in ACS subtypes as they appear to generally reflect the redefinition of MI in the troponin era.

[New guidelines covering the whole spectrum of the acute coronary syndrome]. / Nya riktlinjer för akuta koronara syndromet.

To better align with the clinical setting, the European Society of Cardiology has published new guidelines covering the whole spectrum of the acute coronary syndrome, including ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina.

[Patients hospitalized in the ICU for acute coronary syndrome from 2012 to 2021: A single-center retrospective study]. / Les patients hospitalisés en réanimation pour un syndrome coronarien aigu de 2012 à 2021 : une étude rétrospective monocentrique.

INTRODUCTION: Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) are one of the main causes of mortality in France. Patients presenting with ACS are typically hospitalized in a specialized cardiology ward. The main objective of this study was to describe, characterize and evaluate the outcome of patients hospitalized for ACS in a generalist intensive care unit (rather than a cardiac care unit). METHODS: This was a retrospective study. Our population consisted of ACS patients admitted to an intensive care unit in a hospital center (Centre Hospitalier de Troyes) between 2012 and 2021. All patients admitted for ACS to the intensive care unit and who underwent coronary angiography were included. RESULTS: In 10 years, 104 patients, or 3.8% of ACS patients who underwent coronary angiography were admitted to intensive care. The majority were admitted after recovered cardiac arrest (72%) and were in cardiogenic shock (68%), accounting for a high in-hospital mortality (45.2%). In-hospital mortality was 45.2%. In multivariate analysis, the GRACE score was associated with in-hospital mortality (OR for each additional point = 1.024, 95% confidence interval 1.006-1.045, p = 0.01). Among the survivors, 88% had good neurological function when leaving the hospital. DISCUSSION: Mortality of ACS patients in intensive care was close to 50%. However, the neurological prognosis of the surviving patients was good. This population is rarely mentioned in the literature, and deserves to be evaluated by multicenter, prospective registries, with a view to improving management and prognosis.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome and left ventricle dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An observational study.

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) need adequate antithrombotic protection. We aim to compare the clinical outcomes between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in these patients. In total, 336 patients with ACS and LV dysfunction who undergoing PCI were included in this retrospective observational study. Of these, 137 received clopidogrel and 199 received ticagrelor. There was a 6-month follow-up period during which clinical outcomes were monitored. The incidence of the composite endpoint (23.1% vs 13.9%, P = .041) and bleeding events (6.5% vs 1.5%, P = .027) in the ticagrelor group were significantly higher compared to the clopidogrel group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age (P = .006), hypertension (P = .007), liver insufficiency (P = .022), previous MI (P = .014) and ticagrelor (P = .044) were independent risk factors that affect the efficacy outcome. Age (P = .027) and ticagrelor (P = .016) were the independent risk factors for the safety outcome. Furthermore, in Cox survival regression analysis model, the survival rate of the efficacy endpoint in the clopidogrel group was seemingly higher than in the ticagrelor group (HR = 1.68, 95% CI: 0.97-2.90, P = .065). The survival rate of the bleeding endpoint in the clopidogrel group was higher than in the ticagrelor group (HR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.17-3.40, P = .011). Compared to clopidogrel, ticagrelor showed increased risk of efficacy outcome and major bleeding events during 6-month follow-up in patients with ACS and LV dysfunction undergoing PCI.

In-Hospital Mortality and Treatment in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome With and Without Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Findings From the CCC-ACS Project.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute coronary syndrome without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs; hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, diabetes) have not been well studied, with little known about their characteristics, quality of care, or outcomes. We sought to systematically analyze patients with ACS without SMuRFs, especially to evaluate the effectiveness of guideline-directed medical therapy for these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome) project (2014-2019), we examined the presence and absence of SMuRFs and features among 89 462 patients with initial acute coronary syndrome. The main outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Among eligible patients, 11.0% had none of the SMuRFs (SMuRF-less). SMuRF-less patients had higher in-hospital mortality (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.49 [95% CI, 1.19-1.87]). After adjustment for clinical characteristics and treatments, the associations between SMuRF status and in-hospital mortality persisted (adjusted HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.07-1.70]). Guideline-directed optimal medical therapy (receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, ß-blockers, and statins) was not associated with lower mortality (adjusted HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.58-1.67]) in SMuRF-less patients, unlike the association in patients with SMuRFs (adjusted HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.66-0.98]). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with these results. CONCLUSIONS: SMuRF-less patients were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Guideline-directed medical therapy was less effective in SMuRF-less patients than in patients with SMuRFs. Dedicated studies are needed to confirm the optimal therapy for SMuRF-less patients. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02306616.

Triglyceride-glucose index as a predictor of cardiac adverse events in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: role of diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Triglyceride-glucose index (TyG), a surrogate marker of insulin resistance (IR), could be a potential prognostic marker in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We evaluated the effect of the TyG index on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: This registry-based cohort study was conducted at Tehran Heart Center from 2015 to 2021 and the median follow-up duration was 378 days. The primary outcome was MACCE and the secondary outcomes were MACCE components: all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization, target lesion revascularization, and coronary artery bypass grafting. For comparison among TyG quartiles (Q), the log-rank test was used. Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to describe the association between TyG quartiles and MACCE. A subgroup of euglycemic patients was also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 13,542 patients were included. Patients in the fourth TyG quartile (Q4) were younger, had higher mean BMI, and higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. The adjusted Cox model showed that a 1-unit increment of the TyG index was associated with a significantly higher risk of MACCE (aHR 1.18, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.30, p < 0.001). Among TyG quartiles, there was a higher MACCE incidence in Q4 compared to Q1 (aHR 1.29, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.53, p = 0.005). In the euglycemic subgroup of the population, there was no significant association between MACCE incidence and a 1-unit increase in TyG or among TyG quartiles. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, while higher TyG levels and quartiles were associated with higher rates of MACCE in ACS, there was no such effect in the euglycemic population. If confirmed in future studies, these results can be beneficial for clinicians to risk stratify these patients with an easy-to-use index and determine clinical plans based on their risk.

In patients with NSTE-ACS and previous CABG, routine invasive vs. conservative management does not improve outcomes.

SOURCE CITATION: Kelham M, Vyas R, Ramaseshan R, et al. Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes with previous coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of invasive vs. conservative management. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:2380-2391. 38805681.

Impact of Immediate Versus Staged Complete Revascularization on Short-Term and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Multivessel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and multivessel disease (MVD), complete revascularization (CR) improves prognosis. This meta-analysis, summarizing recent RCTs, contrasts short-term and long-term clinical outcomes between immediate complete revascularization (ICR) and staged complete revascularization (SCR). METHODS: We systematically searched the online database and eight RCTs were involved. The primary outcomes included long-term unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, re-infarction, combined cardiovascular (CV) death or myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause death, CV death, stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). The secondary outcomes were 1-month unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization, re-infarction, all-cause death, and CV death. Safety endpoints included stent thrombosis and major bleeding. RESULTS: Eight RCTs comprising 5198 patients were involved. ICR reduced long-term unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.81, p < 0.001), combined CV death or MI (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.78, p = 0.002), and re-infarction (RR 0.66,95% CI 0.48 to 0.91, p = 0.012) compared with SCR. ICR also decreased 1-month unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization (RR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.21-0.77, p = 0.006) and re-infarction (RR 0.33, 95% CI:0.15-0.74, p = 0.007) but increased 1-month all-cause death (RR 2.22, 95% CI 1.06-4.65, p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: In ACS patients with MVD, we first found that ICR significantly lowered the risk of both short-term and long-term unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization and re-infarction, as well as the long-term composite outcome of CV death or MI compared with SCR. However, there may be an increase in 1-month all-cause death in the ICR group.

After ACS, telemedicine-based care with remote patient monitoring vs. usual care reduced hospital readmissions at 6 mo.

SOURCE CITATION: Alshahrani NS, Hartley A, Howard J, et al. Randomized trial of remote assessment of patients after an acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;83:2250-2259. 38588928.

Optical frequency domain imaging-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes: the OPINION ACS randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: The clinical benefits of optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain unclear. AIMS: We sought to compare intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)- and OFDI-guided PCI in patients with ACS. METHODS: OPINION ACS is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority trial that compared OFDI-guided PCI with IVUS-guided PCI using current-generation drug-eluting stents in ACS patients (n=158). The primary endpoint was in-stent minimum lumen area (MLA), assessed using 8-month follow-up OFDI. RESULTS: Patients presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (55%), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (29%), or unstable angina pectoris (16%). PCI procedural success was achieved in all patients, with comparably low periprocedural complications rates in both groups. Immediately after PCI, the minimum stent area (p=0.096) tended to be smaller for OFDI versus IVUS guidance. Proximal stent edge dissection (p=0.012) and irregular protrusion (p=0.03) were significantly less frequent in OFDI-guided procedures than in IVUS-guided procedures. Post-PCI coronary flow, assessed using corrected Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame counts, was significantly better in the OFDI-guided group than in the IVUS-guided group (p<0.001). The least squares mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) in-stent MLA at 8 months was 4.91 (95% CI: 4.53-5.30) mm2 and 4.76 (95% CI: 4.35-5.17) mm2 in the OFDI- and IVUS-guided groups, respectively, demonstrating the non-inferiority of OFDI guidance (pnon-inferiority<0.001). The average neointima area tended to be smaller in the OFDI-guided group. The frequency of major adverse cardiac events was similar. CONCLUSIONS: Among ACS patients, OFDI-guided PCI and IVUS-guided PCI were equally safe and feasible, with comparable in-stent MLA at 8 months. OFDI guidance may be a potential option in ACS patients. This study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jrct.niph.go.jp: jRCTs052190093).