RESUMO
Introduction: This study compared, in high responders undergoing IVF treatment, GnRH agonist-only trigger and dual trigger on oocyte retrieval rate and cumulative live birth rate (LBR). The aim was to determine if the GnRH agonist-only triggers had provided outcomes comparable to dual trigger, while minimizing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Materials and methods: A retrospective, matched case-control study was conducted at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, including women who underwent IVF/ICSI between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022. Inclusion criteria were: GnRH antagonist protocol and estrogen level >3,000 pg/ml on trigger day. Exclusion criteria were: immune/metabolic diseases, donated oocytes, and mixed stimulation cycles. Propensity score matching was applied to balance age, AMH level, and oocyte number between the GnRH agonist-only and dual trigger groups. Outcomes were analyzed for patients who had complete treatment cycles, focusing on oocyte retrieval rate and cumulative LBR. Results: We analyzed 116 cycles in the agonist-only group, and 232 cycles in the dual trigger group. No inter-group difference was found in their age, BMI, and AMH levels. The dual trigger group had a higher oocyte retrieval rate (93% vs. 80%; p <0.05), while fertilization rates, blastocyst formation rates, and cumulative LBR were comparable. Notably, no OHSS cases had been reported in the GnRH agonist-only group, compared with 7 cases in the dual trigger group. Conclusion: GnRH agonist-only triggers resulted in a lower oocyte retrieval rate compared to dual triggers but did not significantly affect cumulative LBR in high responders. This approach effectively reduces OHSS risk without compromising pregnancy outcomes, making it a preferable option in freeze-all strategies, despite a longer oocyte pick-up duration and a medium cost. GnRH agonist-only trigger, however, may not be suitable for fresh embryo transfers or patients with low serum LH levels on trigger day.
Assuntos
Coeficiente de Natalidade , Fertilização in vitro , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina , Recuperação de Oócitos , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Indução da Ovulação , Humanos , Feminino , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inibidores , Adulto , Recuperação de Oócitos/métodos , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Gravidez , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/epidemiologia , Nascido Vivo/epidemiologia , Taxa de Gravidez , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/uso terapêutico , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/administração & dosagem , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas/métodosRESUMO
Since the inception of in vitro fertilization (IVF), monitoring of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) has traditionally involved numerous appointments for ultrasound and laboratory testing to guide medication use and dosing, determine trigger timing, and allow for measures to reduce the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Recent advances in the field of assisted reproductive technology (ART) have called into question the timing and frequency of COS monitoring appointments, as discussed in this commentary.
Assuntos
Fertilização in vitro , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Indução da Ovulação , Humanos , Feminino , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , GravidezAssuntos
Agonistas de Dopamina , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas , Humanos , Feminino , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Agonistas de Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Agonistas de Dopamina/administração & dosagem , Gravidez , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To summarize the findings of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the potential effect of aromatase inhibitors on preventing moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: We searched for relevant RCTs in electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception to August 2023). In addition, we manually searched the related reviews and reference lists of included studies for further relevant studies. We included RCTs where aromatase inhibitors prescribed either during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) or in early luteal phase. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate to severe OHSS. A descriptive analysis was conducted in cases where a meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity or lack of comparable data. RESULTS: 2858 records were retrieved and 12 RCTs were finally included. Letrozole was administered in the treatment group during COS in seven RCTs, whereas in the early luteal phase in five RCTs. Compared with the control group, the risk of moderate to severe OHSS significantly reduced by 55% in the letrozole group (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.64, I2 = 0%, 5 RCTs, 494 patients). Moreover, serum estradiol (E2) levels on hCG trigger day significantly decreased with the administration of letrozole during COS (MD -847.23, 95% CI -1398.00 to -296.47, I2 = 93%, 5 RCTs, 374 patients). And serum E2 levels on the 4th, 5th and 7th to 10th day after hCG trigger were also significantly lower than those in the control group when letrozole was administered in the early luteal phase. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high risk of OHSS probably benefit from letrozole, which has been revealed to reduce the incidence of moderate to severe OHSS by this systematic review. However, the very limited number of participants and the quality of the included studies does not allow to recommend letrozole for the prevention of severe OHSS.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Aromatase , Fertilização in vitro , Infertilidade Feminina , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Indução da Ovulação , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Inibidores da Aromatase/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Aromatase/uso terapêutico , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Infertilidade Feminina/prevenção & controle , Infertilidade Feminina/etiologia , Letrozol/uso terapêutico , Letrozol/administração & dosagem , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/etiologia , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Indução da Ovulação/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To undertake a one-stage meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials comparing individualized dosing of follitropin delta vs. other forms of follitropin (alpha and beta) for live birth (LB) rates (LBR) and safety parameters in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization treatment. DESIGN: Systematic review with individual patient data meta-analysis. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENTS: Women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization treatment. INTERVENTIONS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Web of Science to identify eligible phase 3 trials between January 1, 2000, and February 1, 2023. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All analyses were based on individual participant data. We used a general linear mixed effects logistic regression model using fixed effects for treatment drugs interacting with log (AMH) level, age, and random effects for country and trial to compare the primary efficacy and safety outcomes of LB and early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and/or the need for OHSS preventative measures, with ovarian stimulation parameters and neonatal outcomes also assessed. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023399711. RESULTS: Three trials met inclusion criteria and included 2,685 women undertaking 2,682 cycles between October 2013 and May 2020, with LB follow-up through to February 1, 2023. For women with an elevated AMH level (≥15 pmol/L), there was high-quality evidence that the use of individualized dosing of follitropin delta was associated with an increased LB rate (adjusted odds ratio [adj OR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14, 2.36). Safety outcomes were also improved with a reduced risk of both early OHSS and/or the need for preventative interventions (adj OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15, 0.49) and early moderate or severe OHSS (adj OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16, 0.58). These improvements in outcomes were obtained with a lower total dose of gonadotropin (-48.7 µg, 95% CI -53.7, -43.8) and no adjustments in the daily dose. In contrast, similar LB rates (adj OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.63, 1.17) and safety outcomes (adj OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.76, 4.87) were observed for women with an AMH level of <15 pmol/L. There were no clinically meaningful differences in neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Using follitropin delta in an AMH level and weight-based algorithm rather than conventional licensed dosing of follitropin alpha or beta for ovarian stimulation in women is associated with improved LB rates and safety outcomes for women with elevated AMH levels.
Assuntos
Fertilização in vitro , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante Humano , Nascido Vivo , Indução da Ovulação , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Proteínas Recombinantes , Humanos , Feminino , Nascido Vivo/epidemiologia , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante Humano/administração & dosagem , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante Humano/efeitos adversos , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Gravidez , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Indução da Ovulação/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes/efeitos adversos , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/epidemiologia , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/administração & dosagem , Fármacos para a Fertilidade Feminina/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Taxa de Gravidez , Adulto , Medicina de Precisão/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Follitropin delta is a novel recombinant follicle stimulating hormone preparation uniquely expressed in a human fetal retinal cell line by recombinant DNA technology. To date, no systematic review was available about the safety and the efficacy of the follitropin delta. The objective of this study was systematically reviewing the available literature and to provide updated evidence regarding the efficacy-safety profile of follitropin delta when compared to other gonadotropin formulations for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. METHODS: An extensive search was performed to identify phase 1, phase 2 and phase 3 RCTs in humans focused on follitropin delta use for ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles. The risk of bias and the overall quality of the evidence was analyzed. All data were extracted and analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle and expressed per woman randomized. RESULTS: A total of 7 RCTs (1 phase 1 RCT, 2 phase 2 RCTs and 4 phase 3 RCTs) were included in the qualitative analysis, whereas data of three phase 3 RCTs were meta-analyzed. All trials compared personalized recombinant follitropin delta treatment versus conventional recombinant follitropin alfa/beta administration in potentially normo-responder patients who receive ovarian stimulation in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles. No difference between two regimens was detected for clinical pregnancy rate [odds ratio (OR) 1.06; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.90, 1.24; P = 0.49; I2 = 26%], ongoing pregnancy rate (OR 1.15; 95%CI: 0.90, 1.46; P = 0.27; I2 = 40%), and live birth rate (OR 1.18; 95%CI: 0.89, 1.55; P = 0.25; I2 = 55%). No data were available regarding cumulative success rates. The rate of adoption of strategies to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) development (OR 0.45; 95%CI: 0.30, 0.66; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0%), and the rate of both early OHSS (OR 0.62; 95%CI: 0.43, 0.88; P = 0.008; I2 = 0%) and all forms of OHSS (OR 0.61; 95%CI: 0.44, 0.84; P = 0.003; I2 = 0%) were significantly lower in the group of patients treated with personalized follitropin delta treatment compared to those treated with conventional follitropin alfa/beta administration. CONCLUSION: Personalized follitropin delta treatment is associated with a lower risk of OHSS compared to conventional follitropin alfa/beta administration in potentially normo-responder patients who receive ovarian stimulation in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles. The absence of cumulative data does not allow definitive conclusions to be drawn regarding the comparison of the effectiveness of the two treatments. PROTOCOL STUDY REGISTRATION: CRD42023470352 (available at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO ).
Assuntos
Hormônio Foliculoestimulante Humano , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Proteínas Recombinantes , Sêmen , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The maximum daily dose of follitropin delta for ovarian stimulation in the first in vitro fertilization cycle is 12 µg (180 IU), according to the algorithm developed by the manufacturer, and based on patient's ovarian reserve and weight. This study aimed to assess whether 150 IU of menotropin combined with follitropin delta improves the response to stimulation in women with serum antimullerian hormone levels less than 2.1 ng/mL. METHODS: This study involved a prospective intervention group of 44 women who received 12 µg of follitropin delta combined with 150 IU of menotropin from the beginning of stimulation and a retrospective control group of 297 women who received 12 µg of follitropin delta alone during the phase 3 study of this drug. The inclusion and exclusion criteria and other treatment and follow-up protocols in the two groups were similar. The pituitary suppression was achieved by administering a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. Ovulation triggering with human chorionic gonadotropin or GnRH agonist and the option of transferring fresh embryos or using freeze-all strategy were made according to the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. RESULTS: Women who received follitropin delta combined with menotropin had higher estradiol levels on trigger day (2150 pg/mL vs. 1373 pg/mL, p < 0.001), more blastocysts (3.1 vs. 2.4, p = 0.003) and more top-quality blastocysts (1.8 vs. 1.3, p = 0.017). No difference was observed in pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, and live birth rates after the first embryo transfer. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome did not differ between the groups. However, preventive measures for the syndrome were more frequent in the group using both drugs than in the control group (13.6% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In women with serum antimullerian hormone levels less than 2.1 ng/mL, the administration of 150 IU of menotropin combined with 12 µg of follitropin delta improved the ovarian response, making it a valid therapeutic option in situations where ovulation triggering with a GnRH agonist and freeze-all embryos strategy can be used routinely. TRIAL REGISTRATION: U1111-1247-3260 (Brazilian Register of Clinical Trials, available at https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-2kmyfm ).
Assuntos
Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/etiologia , Menotropinas , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hormônio Antimülleriano , Taxa de Gravidez , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Hormônio Liberador de GonadotropinaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adequately selecting the initial follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) dose during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is key for success in assisted reproduction. The objective of COS is to obtain an optimal number of oocytes to increase the chances of achieving a pregnancy, while avoiding complications for the patient. Current clinical protocols do achieve good results for the majority of patients, but further refinements in individualized FSH dosing may reduce the risk of poor ovarian response while also limiting the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk. Models to select the first FSH dose in COS have been presented in literature with promising results. However, most have only been developed and tested in normo-ovulatory women under the age of 40 years. METHODS: This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, single blinded, clinical trial. This study will be performed in 236 first cycle in vitro fertilization (IVF) and/or ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection) patients, randomized 1:1 in two arms. In the intervention arm, the dose of FSH will be assigned by a machine learning (ML) model called IDoser, while in the control arm, the dose will be determined by the clinician following standard practice. Stratified block randomization will be carried out depending on the patient being classified as expected low responder, high responder, or normo-responder. Patients will complete their participation in the trial once the first embryo transfer result is known. The primary outcome of the study is the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved at ovarian pick up (OPU) and the hypothesis of non-inferiority of the intervention arm compared to the control. Secondary outcomes include the number of cycle cancelations (due to low response or no retrieval of mature oocytes), risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates per first transfer. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial to test clinical performance of an all-patient inclusive model to select the first dose of FSH for COS. Prospective trials for machine learning (ML) models in healthcare are scarce but necessary for clinical application. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05948293 . Registered on 14 July 2023.
Assuntos
Hormônio Foliculoestimulante , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Masculino , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante/efeitos adversos , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas/métodos , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/etiologia , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Indução da Ovulação/efeitos adversos , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Sêmen , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Taxa de Gravidez , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Multicêntricos como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: hCG is commonly used as an ovulation trigger in IVF. Its usage is associated with OHSS. GnRH agonist is an alternative to hCG and is associated with reduced incidence of OHSS. This study compared the cycle outcomes of GnRH agonists with hCG as an ovulation trigger in IVF cycles. METHODS: The medical notes of 209 IVF cycles receiving GnRH agonist and hCG as ovulation trigger over 18 months were reviewed in this retrospective study. The number and quality of mature oocytes, the number and quality of embryos, pregnancy rates, and outcomes were compared using Independent T-test or One-way ANOVA for normal distribution. The Mann-Whitney test or Kruskal-Wallis test was used for not normally distributed. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The cycle outcomes of 107 GnRH agonist-trigger and 102 hCG-trigger were compared. The MII oocytes retrieved and 2PN count was significantly higher in the GnRH agonist trigger group (p<0.001). Clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy were higher in the GnRH agonist trigger group but were not statistically significant. The GnRH agonist trigger group was associated with low OHSS than the hCG trigger group (n=2(1.9%) and n=12(11.8%) respectively, p=0.004). CONCLUSION: GnRH agonist trigger is an option as a final maturation trigger in high-responder women undergoing IVF or ICSI cycles.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Gonadotropina Coriônica/uso terapêutico , Fertilização , Fertilização in vitro , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina , Malásia/epidemiologia , Oócitos , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Ovulação , Indução da Ovulação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção TerciáriaRESUMO
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) may be a severe complication of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation during assisted reproductive technology. During OHSS, fluid shifts from the intravascular space to the third-space compartments as the result of an increase in capillary permeability. This can cause fluid accumulation in peritoneal as well as thoracic cavities. The patient presented with symptoms of severe OHSS (bilateral hydrothorax and pulmonary effusion), requiring bilateral ultrasound-guided paracentesis and bilateral thoracentesis during her Emergency Room visits and hospitalization. Due to distant effects from the increased capillary permeability, the patient presented fluid in the middle ear, which led to the development of serous otitis media 12 days after egg retrieval. This was resolved 2-3 weeks later after being treated with antihistamines and antibiotics given by her Ear, Nose, and Throat doctor. OHSS risk may be reduced by continuous monitoring of patients undergoing ovulation induction, using an appropriate gonadotropin dosage, and using additional agents known to decrease its risk. If OHSS still occurs, symptomatic treatment and a multidisciplinary team of professionals may be needed to prevent fluid build-up complications. In contrast to many published articles about OHSS and its complications, this is the first case report of a patient presenting serous otitis media as a complication of severe OHSS.
Assuntos
Otite Média com Derrame , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Feminino , Humanos , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/complicações , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Otite Média com Derrame/complicações , Indução da Ovulação/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/efeitos adversos , Peritônio , Fertilização in vitro/efeitos adversosRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger alone versus dual trigger comprising GnRHa and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on reproductive outcomes in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who received the freeze-all strategy. METHODS: A total of 615 cycles were included in this retrospective cohort study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control potential confounding factors between GnRHa-trigger group (0.2 mg GnRHa) and dual-trigger group (0.2 mg GnRHa plus 1000/2000 IU hCG) in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to estimate the association between trigger methods and reproductive outcomes. RESULTS: After PSM, patients with dual trigger (n = 176) had more oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, and 2PN embryos compared to that with GnRHa trigger alone. However, the oocytes maturation rate, normal fertilization rate, and frozen embryos between the two groups were not statistically different. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (14.8% vs. 2.8%, P < 0.001) and moderate/severe OHSS (11.4% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in dual-trigger group than in GnRHa-alone group. Logistic regression analysis showed the adjusted odds ratio of dual trigger was 5.971 (95% confidence interval 2.201-16.198, P < 0.001) for OHSS. The pregnancy and single neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: For PCOS women with freeze-all strategy, GnRHa trigger alone decreased the risk of OHSS without damaging oocyte maturation and achieved satisfactory pregnancy outcomes.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Feminino , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/complicações , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/tratamento farmacológico , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pontuação de Propensão , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/farmacologia , Gonadotropina Coriônica/farmacologia , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Oócitos , Taxa de GravidezRESUMO
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is a serious complication associated with assisted reproductive technology. This systematic review aims to identify who is at high risk for developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, along with evidence-based strategies to prevent it and replaces the document of the same name last published in 2016.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/etiologia , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/diagnóstico , Humanos , Feminino , Fatores de Risco , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/efeitos adversos , Gravidez , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Medição de Risco , Indução da Ovulação/efeitos adversos , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normasRESUMO
Objective: The aim of this study is to understand the global practice of routine hormonal monitoring (HM) during ovarian stimulation (OS) in the context of assisted reproductive technique (ART) treatment. Methods: An open-access questionnaire was available to 3,845 members of IVF-Worldwide.com from September 8 to October 13, 2021. The survey comprised 25 multiple-choice questions on when and how ultrasound (US) and hormone tests were conducted during ovarian stimulation OS. For most questions, respondents were required to select a single option. Some questions allowed the selection of multiple options. Results: In all, 528 (13.7%) members from 88 countries responded to the questionnaire. Most respondents (98.9%) reported using US to monitor OS cycles. HM was used by 79.5% of respondents during any of the cycle monitoring visits and was most commonly performed on the day of, or a day prior to final oocyte maturation. Overall, 87% of respondents claimed adjusting the dose of gonadotropin during OS, with 61.7% adjusting the dose based on hormonal levels. Oestradiol (E2) was the most frequently monitored hormone during all visits and was used by 74% of respondents for the prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). On or a day prior to ovulation triggering (OT), the number of respondents who measured progesterone increased from 34.3% in the second/third visit to 67.7%. Approximately one-third of respondents measured luteinizing hormone during all visits. Conclusion: Globally, most ART specialists (~80%) use HM, along with US, for monitoring OS, especially for the prevention of OHSS.
Assuntos
Fertilização in vitro , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Feminino , Humanos , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Hormônio Luteinizante , EstradiolRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of the antiangiogenic medications, namely, aflibercept and cabergoline in the prevention and treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in a rat model. METHODS: A total of 36 female Wistar rats were randomly allocated to one of the five groups, including disease-free and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome controls: Group no OHSS (control, n=6) received saline only intraperitoneally (i.p.); group just OHSS (ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome only, n=6) received 10 IU pregnant mare serum gonadotropin and 30 IU human chorionic gonadotropin subcutaneously to produce ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; group cabergoline+OHSS (cabergoline+ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, n=8) received 100 µg/kg oral cabergoline; group aflibercept (12.5 mg/kg)+OHSS (aflibercept+ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, n=8) received 12.5 mg/kg i.p. aflibercept; and group aflibercept (25 mg/kg)+OHSS (aflibercept+ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, n=8) received 25 mg/kg i.p. aflibercept. The groups were compared for ovarian weight, immunohistochemical vascular endothelial growth factor expression, spectrophotometric vascular permeability evaluated with methylene blue solution in peritoneal lavage, and body weight growth. RESULTS: Vascular endothelial growth factor immunoexpression was substantially greater in the just OHSS group (22.00±10.20%) than in the aflibercept (12.5 mg/kg)+OHSS (7.87±6.13%) and aflibercept (25 mg/kg)+OHSS (5.63±4.53%) groups (p=0.008 and p=0.005, respectively). Post-hoc tests indicated that cabergoline, 12.5 mg/kg aflibercept, and 25 mg/kg aflibercept decreased vascular permeability compared to the untreated ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome group (p=0.003, p=0.003, and p=0.001, respectively). JOH group had the heaviest ovaries, whereas aflibercept (25 mg/kg)+OHSS group had the lightest. In terms of body weight gain, cabergoline+OHSS group was substantially greater than the aflibercept (12.5 mg/kg)+OHSS and aflibercept (25 mg/kg)+OHSS groups (p=0.006 and p=0.007, respectively). CONCLUSION: Aflibercept, an antiangiogenic medication, decreased ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome by lowering the vascular permeability and vascular endothelial growth factor expression.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Humanos , Gravidez , Cavalos , Ratos , Feminino , Animais , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/metabolismo , Cabergolina/uso terapêutico , Ratos Wistar , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Peso CorporalRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Currently, gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues are used to prevent premature ovulation in ART cycles. However, their costs remain high, the route of administration is invasive and has some adverse effects. Oral progestogens could be cheaper and effective to prevent a premature LH surge. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of using progestogens to avoid spontaneous ovulation in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO in Dec 2021. We contacted study authors and experts to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that included progestogens for ovulation inhibition in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane, including the risk of bias (RoB) assessment. The primary review outcomes were live birth rate (LBR) and oocyte pick-up cancellation rate (OPCR). Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), cumulative pregnancy, miscarriage rate (MR), multiple pregnancies, LH surge, total and MII oocytes, days of stimulation, dose of gonadotropins, and moderate/severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate. The primary analyses were restricted to studies at overall low and some concerns RoB, and sensitivity analysis included all studies. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included 14 RCTs (2643 subfertile women undergoing ART, 47 women used oocyte freezing for fertility preservation and 534 oocyte donors). Progestogens versus GnRH antagonists We are very uncertain of the effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 10 mg compared with cetrorelix on the LBR in poor responders (odds ratio (OR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 2.13, one RCT, N = 340, very-low-certainty evidence), suggesting that if the chance of live birth following GnRH antagonists is assumed to be 18%, the chance following MPA would be 14% to 32%. There may be little or no difference in OPCR between progestogens and GnRH antagonists, but due to wide Cs (CIs), we are uncertain (OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.42 to 2.01, 3 RCTs, N = 648, I² = 0%, low-certainty evidence), changing the chance of OPCR from 4% with progestogens to 2% to 8%. Given the imprecision found, no conclusions can be retrieved on CPR and MR. Low-quality evidence suggested that using micronised progesterone in normo-responders may increase by 2 to 6 the MII oocytes in comparison to GnRH antagonists. There may be little or no differences in gonadotropin doses. Progestogens versus GnRH agonists Results were uncertain for all outcomes comparing progestogens with GnRH agonists. One progestogen versus another progestogen The analyses comparing one progestogen versus another progestogen for LBR did not meet our criteria for primary analyses. The OPCR was probably lower in the MPA 10 mg in comparison to MPA 4 mg (OR 2.27, 95%CI 0.90 to 5.74, one RCT, N = 300, moderate-certainty evidence), and MPA 4 mg may be lower than micronised progesterone 100 mg, but due to wide CI, we are uncertain of the effect (OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.43 to 1.53, one RCT, N = 300, low-certainty evidence), changing the chance of OPCR from 5% with MPA 4 mg to 5% to22%, and from 17% with micronised progesterone 100 mg to 8% to 24%. When comparing dydrogesterone 20 mg to MPA, the OPCR is probably lower in the dydrogesterone group in comparison to MPA 10 mg (OR 1.49, 95%CI 0.80 to 2.80, one RCT, N = 520, moderate-certainty evidence), and it may be lower in dydrogesterone group in comparison to MPA 4 mg but due to wide confidence interval, we are uncertain of the effect (OR 1.19, 95%CI 0.61 to 2.34, one RCT, N = 300, low-certainty evidence), changing the chance of OPCR from 7% with dydrogesterone 20 to 6-17%, and in MPA 4 mg from 12% to 8% to 24%. When comparing dydrogesterone 20 mg to micronised progesterone 100 mg, the OPCR is probably lower in the dydrogesterone group (OR 1.54, 95%CI 0.94 to 2.52, two RCTs, N=550, I² = 0%, moderate-certainty evidence), changing OPCR from 11% with dydrogesterone to 10% to 24%. We are very uncertain of the effect in normo-responders of micronised progesterone 100 mg compared with micronised progesterone 200 mg on the OPCR (OR 0.35, 95%CI 0.09 to 1.37, one RCT, N = 150, very-low-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference in CPR and MR between MPA 10 mg and dydrogesterone 20 mg. There may be little or no differences in MII oocytes and gonadotropins doses. No cases of moderate/severe OHSS were reported in most of the groups in any of the comparisons. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Little or no differences in LBR may exist when comparing MPA 4 mg with GnRH agonists in normo-responders. OPCR may be slightly increased in the MPA 4 mg group, but MPA 4 mg reduces the doses of gonadotropins in comparison to GnRH agonists. Little or no differences in OPCR may exist between progestogens and GnRH antagonists in normo-responders and donors. However, micronised progesterone could improve by 2 to 6 MII oocytes. When comparing one progestogen to another, dydrogesterone suggested slightly lower OPCR than MPA and micronised progesterone, and MPA suggested slightly lower OPCR than the micronised progesterone 100 mg. Finally, MPA 10 mg suggests a lower OPCR than MPA 4 mg. There is uncertainty regarding the rest of the outcomes due to imprecision and no solid conclusions can be drawn.
Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Didrogesterona , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina , Gonadotropinas , Nascido Vivo , Hormônio Luteinizante , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Taxa de Gravidez , Progesterona , Progestinas/uso terapêutico , Técnicas de Reprodução AssistidaRESUMO
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the main severe complication of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. The aim of the current study was to identify the interventions for the prevention of and reduction in the incidence and severity of OHSS in patients who undergo IVF not included in systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and assess and grade their efficacy and evidence base. The best available evidence for each specific intervention was identified, analyzed in terms of safety/efficacy ratio and risk of bias, and graded using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) hierarchy of evidence. A total of 15 interventions to prevent OHSS were included in the final analysis. In the IVF population not at a high risk for OHSS, follitropin delta for ovarian stimulation may reduce the incidence of early OHSS and/or preventive interventions for early OHSS. In high-risk patients, inositol pretreatment, ovulation triggering with low doses of urinary hCG, and the luteal phase administration of a GnRH antagonist may reduce OHSS risk. In conclusion, even if not supported by systematic reviews with homogeneity of the RCTs, several treatments/strategies to reduce the incidence and severity of OHSS have been shown to be promising.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Feminino , Humanos , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Incidência , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/uso terapêutico , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Fertilização in vitro/efeitos adversosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: For high responders with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), there is no clear recommendation for the initial follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) dosage to ensure an optimal number of retrieved oocytes and avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The aim of this study was to determine the ideal initial FSH dosage of in patients with PCOS undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol to obtain the optimal number of retrieved oocytes and minimize the risk of OHSS. METHODS: The data of 1898 patients with PCOS aged 20-40 years from January 2017 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed to explore the factors related to the number of retrieved oocytes. Statistically significant variables were used to construct a dose nomogram and it was then validated using an independent cohort of patients with PCOS from January 2021 to December 2021. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses demonstrated that body mass index (BMI) was the most significant factor to predict the number of retrieved oocytes compared to body weight (BW) and body surface area (BSA). Among patients with PCOS aged 20-40 years undergoing their first IVF cycles with the GnRH-ant protocol, age was not a significant predictor of the initial FSH dosage. We developed a nomogram based on BMI, basal FSH, basal luteinizing hormone (bLH), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), and antral follicle count (AFC) to calculate the ideal initial FSH dosage for patients with PCOS undergoing IVF/ICSI using the GnRH-ant protocol. In addition, low BMI and high bLH and AMH levels and AFC appear to be risk factors for OHSS. CONCLUSIONS: We clearly demonstrated that the initial FSH dosage for patients with PCOS undergoing IVF/ICSI with the GnRH-ant protocol may be calculated on the basis of the woman's BMI and ovarian reserve markers. The nomogram will help guide clinicians in the selection of the most appropriate initial FSH dose in the future.
Assuntos
Formigas , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante Humano , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina , Nomogramas , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/complicações , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sêmen , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To present a patient with familial partial lipodystrophy (FPLD) and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who was admitted with spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)-like extremely enlarged ovaries, which was successfully treated using gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs and abdominal cyst aspiration in combination. METHOD: This is a descriptive case report of a single patient with FPLD and PCOS. RESULTS: Clinical improvement was achieved 6 months after therapy besides progressive reduction in total testosterone and DHEAS. Furthermore, there was a significant improvement in hyperinsulinemia and hypertriglyceridemia. Additionally, reduction in the size of ovarian cysts, reduction in the size and number of localizations of acanthosis nigricans, reduction in scores of mFGS, and weight loss were also observed. CONCLUSION: Although there are few reports in the literature describing the association between PCOS with FPLD, management of this novel spontaneous OHSS-like condition has not yet been clearly defined. In the case of extremely enlarged multicystic ovaries and severe hyperandrogenemia, GnRH analogs may be considered to prevent ovarian enlargement and reduce hyperandrogenemia, especially when other treatment options are inappropriate.
Assuntos
Lipodistrofia Parcial Familiar , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Feminino , Humanos , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/complicações , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana/prevenção & controle , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/complicações , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/tratamento farmacológico , Indução da Ovulação , Lipodistrofia Parcial Familiar/complicações , Lipodistrofia Parcial Familiar/tratamento farmacológico , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a potentially life-threating iatrogenic complication of the early luteal phase and/or early pregnancy after in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. The aim of the current study was to identify the most effective methods for preventing of and reducing the incidence and severity of OHSS in IVF patients. A systematic review of systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with meta-analysis was used to assess each potential intervention (PROSPERO website, CRD 268626) and only studies with the highest quality were included in the qualitative analysis. Primary outcomes included prevention and reduction of OHSS incidence and severity. Secondary outcomes were maternal death, incidence of hospital admission, days of hospitalization, and reproductive outcomes, such as incidence of live-births, clinical pregnancies, pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriages, and oocytes retrieved. A total of specific interventions related to OHSS were analyzed in 28 systematic reviews of RCTs with meta-analyses. The quality assessment of the included studies was high, moderate, and low for 23, 2, and 3 studies, respectively. The certainty of evidence (CoE) for interventions was reported for 37 specific situations/populations and resulted high, moderate, and low-to-very low for one, 5, and 26 cases, respectively, while it was not reported in 5 cases. Considering the effective interventions without deleterious reproductive effects, GnRH-ant co-treatment (36 RCTs; OR 0.61, 95% C 0.51 to 0.72, n = 7,944; I2 = 31%) and GnRH agonist triggering (8 RCTs; OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.47, n = 989; I2 = 42%) emerged as the most effective interventions for preventing OHSS with a moderate CoE, even though elective embryo cryopreservation exhibited a low CoE. Furthermore, the use of mild ovarian stimulation (9 RCTs; RR 0.26, CI 0.14 to 0.49, n = 1,925; I2 = 0%), and dopaminergic agonists (10 RCTs; OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.44, n = 1,202; I2 = 13%) coadministration proved effective and safe with a moderate CoE. In conclusion, the current study demonstrates that only a few interventions currently can be considered effective to reduce the incidence of OHSS and its severity with high/moderate CoE despite the numerous published studies on the topic. Further well-designed RCTs are needed, particularly for GnRH-a down-regulated IVF cycles.