Inadvertent removal of a needle foreign body via endoscopic suctioning in a dog.

A 6-month-old intact female English bulldog was presented following witnessed ingestion of a sewing needle. The dog underwent attempted endoscopic retrieval under general anesthesia. The needle foreign body was visualized but could not be removed due to orientation, and subsequent attempts at visualization were unsuccessful. Due to the unsuccessful removal, radiographs were obtained before intended surgical exploration, and no sewing needle was identified. The needle was subsequently identified in the working channel of the endoscope, and the dog recovered uneventfully. This is the first report to describe inadvertent endoscopic suctioning of a sharp, needle foreign body. Key clinical message: Endoscopy is a key tool in the management and treatment of sharp gastric foreign bodies. Complications are uncommon and typically patient-focused, including gastric perforation or irritation. However, this case report identifies an additional complication that should be considered when endoscopy is not successful.

Retrait par inadvertance d'un corps étranger par aspiration endoscopique d'une aiguille chez un chienUne femelle bouledogue anglais intacte de 6 mois a été présentée après l'ingestion d'une aiguille à coudre en présence d'un témoin. La chienne a subi une tentative de retrait endoscopique sous anesthésie générale. L'aiguille a été visualisée mais n'a pas pu être retirée en raison de l'orientation, et les tentatives ultérieures de visualisation ont échoué. En raison de l'échec du retrait, des radiographies ont été obtenues avant l'exploration chirurgicale prévue, et aucune aiguille à coudre n'a été identifiée. L'aiguille a ensuite été identifiée dans le canal opérateur de l'endoscope, et le chien s'est rétabli sans incident. Il s'agit du premier rapport décrivant l'aspiration endoscopique par inadvertance d'un corps étranger pointu ou tranchant.Message clinique clé :L'endoscopie est un outil essentiel dans la gestion et le traitement des corps étrangers gastriques tranchants. Les complications sont rares et généralement axées sur le patient, notamment la perforation ou l'irritation gastrique. Cependant, ce rapport de cas identifie une complication supplémentaire qui doit être envisagée lorsque l'endoscopie n'est pas réussie.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

First clinical evaluation of a flexible digital ureteroscope with direct in scope suctioning system (Pusen DISS 7.5Ch): prospective multicentric feasibility study.

PURPOSE: A new digital single-use flexible ureteroscope, Pusen direct in scope suction (DISS) 7.5Fr (PU3033AH), was evaluated with respect to manoeuvrability, suction quality, visibility and clinical efficiency. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted in six tertiary reference centers in Europe and Asia between February-April 2024. Adult patients who underwent flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy (fURSL) for urolithiasis were included. Demographic, intraoperative and follow-up characteristics were recorded. Quality parameters were rated by each surgeon using a Likert scale. RESULTS: a total of 57 fURSL were performed. Preoperative characteristics revealed a mean stone volume of 480.00mm3 (mean Hounsfield Unit- 998). 57.9%(n = 33) of the patients were pre-stented, and a ureteric access sheath was used in 64.9%(n = 37). Integrated-suction was deemed helpful in 94.7%(n = 54) fURSL as reported by the operators. An initial stone free rate (SFR) confirmed by postoperative imaging was achieved in 84.21%(n = 48). Quality parameters of the scope reached a mean Likert score of 4.5, with a "very good" mean evaluation for "scope placement", "visual quality", "irrigation", "deflection", "manoeuvrability", and "weight". "Suction quality" and "overall performance satisfaction" were rated "good". Comparing the Pusen DISS scope with other previously used scopes, overall satisfaction was rated 4.1. When asked if the surgeons would be willing to use the Pusen DISS 7.5Fr scope in the future, all the six surgeons answered positively. CONCLUSION: The DISS 7.5 Pusen ureteroscope displayed good visibility, manoeuvrability and suction quality, with excellent operative results. Further evaluation with larger comparative cohorts will help understand the potential of in-vivo use of integrated suctioning systems for fURSL.

Operative outcomes 24 hours after retrograde intrarenal surgery for solitary renal calculi using a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath. A prospective global multicenter study by the European Association of Urology Section on Urolithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Suction techniques showed potential to improve outcomes of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS). We assessed the 24-hour stone-free rate (SFR) and complications after RIRS using flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS-UAS). METHODS: Sixteen centers prospectively contributed to data (August 2023-October 2023). Inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years, single renal stone, pre and 24-hour post-RIRS CT scan. Exclusion criteria were: ureteral stone, anomalous kidney, multiple stones. SFR was divided into: 1) grade A - no fragments; 2) grade B - fragments ≤2 mm; 3) grade C - fragments 2.1-4 mm; and 4) grade D - fragments >4 mm. A multivariable logistic regression analysis model was performed to assess factors associated with the odds of having grade A stone-free status. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range), absolute numbers and frequencies, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: One hundred forty-two patients with a median age of 52 years (40-61) were enrolled. 61.3% were males. Median stone volume was 1165 mm3 (656-1936). Median operative time was 48.5 (36.25-71.75) min. Transient fever (37°C-37.5°C) occurred in 10 (7%) patients. No sepsis case occurred. 96.5% of patients were stone-free (Grade A+B). Grade A SFR was 52.8%. All patients were discharged within 48 hours. Bone window (OR 3.156 95% CI 1.177-9.130, P=0.027) was the only factor significantly associated with higher odds of 100% SFR, while stone volume (OR 0.999, 95% CI 0.999-1.000, P=0.007) was significantly associated with lower odds. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging and clinical evidence demonstrate excellent perioperative outcomes just 24 hours post RIRS with FANS-UAS. The technique demonstrates a good safety profile, ability for immediate high SFR, and a low rate of infective complications.

Role of subcutaneous closed suction drain in the prevention of incisional surgical site infection after loop ileostomy reversal with purse-string skin closure: a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is not rare after loop ileostomy reversal. This study assessed the effects of a subcutaneous closed suction drain on reducing SSIs after loop ileostomy reversal with purse-string skin closure. METHODS: This retrospective study included 229 patients who underwent loop ileostomy reversal with purse-string closure at the Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. We divided the patients into those with a subcutaneous drain (SD group) and those without it (ND group). We analyzed variables that affected SSI occurrence in both groups. RESULTS: The SD and ND groups included 109 and 120 patients, respectively. The number of incisional SSIs was significantly lower in the SD than in the ND group (0 vs. 7 events). An average of 35.7 mL of fluid was collected in the drainage bulb during hospitalization. The C-reactive protein level on postoperative day 4 was significantly lower in the SD group than in the ND group. The insertion of a subcutaneous drain was the only factor associated with a reduced incidence of SSIs (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous closed suction drain with purse-string skin closure in loop ileostomy reversal can reduce incisional SSI occurrence.

Influence of different cleaning methods on the concentration of airborne endotoxins and microbial aerosols in the oral clinical environment.

AIM: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various cleaning methods in reducing airborne endotoxin and microbial aerosols during oral cleaning procedures. METHOD: Forty patients undergoing oral cleaning procedures were randomly assigned to one of four groups (n = 10 per group). Group A received strong suction alone; Group B received strong suction combined with an air disinfection machine; Group C received strong suction combined with a dental electric suction machine; Group D received strong suction in conjunction with both an air disinfection machine and a dental electric suction machine. Airborne aerosol concentrations were assessed at four-time points: before treatment, 30 min into treatment, immediately after treatment, and 60 min after treatment ended. Samples were collected at distances of 20 cm, 60 cm, and 1 m from the patient's oral cavity using the natural sedimentation method. T-test was used to evaluate the difference among tested groups. RESULTS: Airborne endotoxins and microbial aerosols levels increased significantly during treatment, with the highest levels observed at 20 cm from the patient's mouth. During treatment, groups with additional cleaning methods (Groups B, C, and D) exhibited higher levels of airborne endotoxins and microbial aerosols compared to Group A (strong suction alone). However, post-treatment analysis revealed that Group D demonstrated the lowest level of airborne endotoxins and microbial aerosols, while Group A exhibited the highest. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing effective aerosol management strategies can significantly reduce aerosol dispersion in the oral clinical environment. Continuous monitoring aerosol concentrations and the application of appropriate control measures are essential for minimizing infection risks for both patients and healthcare providers during oral cleaning procedures.

Direct in-scope suction: an in vitro evaluation of a single use flexible ureteroscope with integrated suction capability.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the stone clearance rate and limitations of a novel integrated suction capability within a single-use flexible ureteroscope according to stone particle size. METHODS: Varying sized stone particles were created using a stone phantom (Begostone Plus, Bego ©, Lincoln, RI, USA). Particle size ranged as follows: 63-125 µm, 125-250 µm, 250-500 µm, 500 µm- 1 mm and 1-2 mm. These were mixed with Normal saline (0.9%) to mimic in vivo conditions. The suction enabled single-use flexible ureteroscope (Pusen, Zhuhai, China) was used to aspirate stone fragments in three trials. Firstly, aspiration of 5 g of each dust range was attempted. Secondly, a direct comparison of the integrated suction to a manual syringe technique was applied to 1 g of each size range. Finally, aspiration was applied to 5 g of a heterogenous 1:1:1:1:1 mixture. Endoscopic clearance rate (g/min) and number of blockages were recorded. Each challenge was repeated three times. RESULTS: The integrated suction cleared 100% of dust < 250 µm. Endoscopic clearance rates were significantly faster than manual aspiration (3.01 g/min versus 0.41 g/min) for dust between 125 and 250 µm (p = 0.008). Complete endoscopic clearance by 180 s (without encountering test limiting blockages) was unsuccessful for particles > 250 µm. Clearance rates were greatly limited by stone particle size heterogeneity above 250 µm, to 0.09 g/min. CONCLUSION: This technology works better in vitro than previously DISS evaluated methods when challenged by stone dust < 250 µm. However, this adaptation is significantly challenged in the presence of stone dust particles > 250 µm.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of different suction pressure for speeding non-ventilated lung collapse in uniport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The bronchial suction has been applied in speeding lung collapse. Low suction pressure may not speed lung collapse, but high pressure causes occult lung injury. The aim of the study was to explore efficacy and safety of different suction pressure for speeding lung collapse. METHODS: Eighty-four subjects undergoing uniport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) were randomly assigned for non-suction (Group 0), -10 cmH2O suction pressure (Group - 10), and - 30 cmH2O suction pressure (Group - 30). The primary outcome were the lung collapse scores (LCS) at 0 min (T0) after the visualization of the lung using a 10-point visual analogue scale and area under the curve (AUC) of LCS over time. The secondary outcomes included disconnection from the ventilator, the assessment of occult lung injury using NOS-3 expression, histologic scores of lung injury, and lung W/D weight ratio, intraoperative hypoxemia, the incidence of perioperative pulmonary complications. RESULTS: Both the LCS at T0 and AUC analysis showed that compared with Group 0, Group - 10 and Group - 30 significantly achieved good lung collapse (P < 0.05), but no difference between Group - 10 and Group - 30. Four patients in Group 0 were treated with disconnection maneuver. The assessment of occult lung injury showed no differences. CONCLUSIONS: Applying - 10 cmH2O suction pressure for 1 min when pleural incision is a relatively safe method to promote lung collapse without the occurrence of occult lung injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry number, ChiCTR2200062991. Registered on 26/08/2022.

The impact of closed suction wound drainage on chronic pain and health-related quality of life after posterior spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Aims: Closed suction subfascial drainage is widely used after instrumented posterior spinal fusion in patients with a spinal deformity. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of this wound drainage on the outcomes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This was a further analysis of a randomized, multicentre clinical trial reporting on patients after posterior spinal fusion using segmental pedicle screw instrumentation. In this study the incidence of deep surgical site infection (SSI) and chronic postoperative pain at two years' follow-up are reported. Methods: We conducted a randomized, multicentre clinical trial on adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS using segmental pedicle screw instrumentation. A total of 90 consecutive patients were randomized into a 'drain' or 'no drain' group at the time of wound closure, using the sealed envelope technique (1:1). The primary outcomes in the initial study were the change in the level of haemoglobin in the blood postoperatively and total blood loss. A secondary outcome was the opioid consumption immediately after surgery. The aim of this further study was to report the rate of deep SSI and persistent postoperative pain, at two years' follow-up. Results: As previously reported, the mean 48-hour opioid consumption was significantly higher in the no drain group (2.0 mg/kg (SD 0.8) vs 1.4 mg/kg (SD 0.7); p = 0.005). There were no delayed deep SSIs. At two years' follow-up, the mean Scoliosis Research Society 24-item questionnaire (SRS-24) total score did not differ between the groups (4.11 (SD 0.47) vs 4.16 (SD 0.33); p = 0.910). The mean SRS-24 pain score was 4.28 (SD 0.48) in the no drain group compared with 4.33 (SD 0.66) in the drain group (p = 0.245). Seven patients (19%) in the no drain group and six in the drain group (14%) reported moderate to severe pain (numerical rating scale ≥ 4) at two years' follow-up (p = 0.484). The general self-image domain score was significantly higher in the no drain group compared with the drain group (4.02 (SD 0.74) vs 4.59 (SD 0.54); p < 0.001). Conclusion: The main finding in this study was that more severe pain immediately after surgery did not result in a higher incidence of chronic pain in the no drain group compared with the drain group. Back pain and health-related quality of life at two years' follow-up did not differ between the groups. The patient-reported self-image domain was significantly better in the no drain group compared with the drain group.

The Effect of Swaddling and Oropharyngeal Colostrum During Endotracheal Suctioning on Procedural Pain and Comfort in Premature Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal suctioning (ES) is a painful procedure frequently performed in the neonatal intensive care unit. This procedure negatively affects the comfort level of premature neonates. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of 2 nonpharmacologic methods, swaddling and the administration of oropharyngeal colostrum, on the pain and comfort levels of preterm neonates during ES. METHODS: This randomized controlled experimental study comprised 48 intubated premature neonates (swaddling group n = 16; oropharyngeal colostrum group n = 16; and control group n = 16) at 26 to 37 weeks of gestation. The neonates were swaddled with a white soft cotton cloth or administered 0.4 mL of oropharyngeal colostrum 2 minutes before ES, according to the group in which they were included. Two observers evaluated the pain levels (Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revize [PIPP-R]) and comfort (Newborn Comfort Behavior Scale [COMFORTneo]) of the infants by observing video recordings of before, during, and after the procedure. FINDINGS/RESULTS: A significantly lower mean PIPP-R score was found in the swaddling group during ES compared with the control group ( P = .002). The mean COMFORTneo scores of the swaddling and oropharyngeal colostrum groups during ES ( P < .01, P = .002) and the mean PIPP-R and COMFORTneo scores immediately after ES and 5, 10, and 15 minutes later were significantly lower than the control group ( P < .005). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: Swaddling was effective both during and after the procedure, while oropharyngeal colostrum was effective only after the procedure in reducing ES-related pain in premature neonates. Swaddling and oropharyngeal colostrum were effective in increasing comfort both during and after the procedure.

Suction drain usage has no benefit following revision total hip and knee arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The use of drains after primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has shown little benefit. Few studies have investigated drain usage after revision TJA. The purpose of this study was to determine whether utilizing suction drains is beneficial for patients undergoing revision arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature review utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines from the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria of this review were all original articles written in English investigating the efficacy and safety of closed suction drainage in revision TKA or THA, reporting at least one of the following outcome measures: (1) estimated blood loss (EBL), (2) perioperative hemoglobin change, (3) needs for transfusion, (4) postoperative infection, and (5) wound complications. Articles were excluded if they are not available in English or they included case reports, systematic reviews, comments, editorials, surveys, or animal studies prior to July 22, 2023. A total of six studies met inclusion criteria. In total, 655 patients had a drain while 1765 patients did not have a drain after revision total hip or knee arthroplasty. Primary outcomes included for meta-analysis included estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative hemoglobin, need for transfusion. Other data extracted includes postoperative infections, and wound complications. RESULTS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 655 patients had drains, while 1765 patients did not after revision total hip or knee arthroplasty. The average age of the patients was 66.1+/- 3.4 years, and the average BMI was 30.3 +/-0.8. There was no difference in postoperative infections (p = 0.14), wound complications (p = 0.621) or need for transfusion (p = 0.521) between the two groups. There was also no difference in EBL (Hedges' g CI[-3.52, 2.77]) or postoperative Hb (Hedges' g CI[-1.65, 2.41]) between patients with and without drains. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not show any benefit from drain placement after revision total hip or knee arthroplasty. With the increased cost, time and need for drain removal, this is likely an unnecessary intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.

A Randomized Control Trial Comparing the Yield of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Using Three Different Techniques in Patients Undergoing Flexible Bronchoscopy (BAL-3T).

BACKGROUND: Three techniques have been described for aspirating the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, namely the wall mount suction (WMS), manual suction (MS), and manual suction with tubing (MST). However, there is no direct comparison among the 3 methods. METHODS: We randomized patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy and BAL in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the 3 arms. The primary outcome was to compare the optimal yield, defined as at least 30% return of volume instilled and <5% bronchial cells. The key secondary outcomes were the percentage of volume and total amount (in millimeters) return of BAL, as well as complications (hypoxemia, airway bleeding, and others). RESULTS: We randomized 942 patients [MST (n = 314), MS (n = 314), WMS (n = 314)]. The mean age of the study population [58.7% (n = 553) males] was 46.9 years. The most common indication for BAL was suspected pulmonary infection. Right upper lobes and middle lobes were the commonest sampled lobes. The optimal yield was similar in all the groups [MST (35.6%) vs MS (42.2%) vs WMS (36.5%); P = 0.27]. A significantly higher proportion of patients had BALF return >30% (P = 0.005) in the WMS (54.2%) and MS (54%) than in the MST arm (42.9%). The absolute and the percentage volume of BALF was also higher in WMS and MS than in the MST arm. There was no difference in the complication rate or other secondary outcomes across the groups. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in the optimal yield of BAL or complications using any one of the 3 methods for BAL fluid retrieval.

Application of 11/13Fr suctioning ureteral access sheath and 8.55Fr single-use digital flexible ureteroscope in one-stage flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: an initial experience of 900 cases.

OBJECTIVES: To report our initial experience of one-stage flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy(FURL) with 11/13Fr suctioning ureteral access sheath(UAS) and 8.55Fr single-use digital flexible ureteroscope(SDFU) in upper ureteral or renal calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 900 adult patients with upper ureteral or renal calculi treated by FURL with 11/13Fr suctioning UAS and 8.55Fr SDFU from January 2022 to April 2024. Demographics, peri- and postoperative outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: In all, 40 of 940 cases(4.26%) failed to introduce UAS and required second-stage FURL because of ureterostenosis and were excluded. Mean stones size of the remaining 900 eligible cases was 1.68 ± 0.58 cm in greatest diameter. There were 228 cases of upper ureteral stone, 456 cases of renal stone and 216 cases of concomitant ureteral and renal calculi. The mean operation time was 52.20 ± 20.21 min and the postoperative hospital stay was 2.87 ± 1.37 days. The stone-free rate of 1 month postoperatively was 89.56% and only 2.44% of patients with residue underwent additional reoperation. The rate of postoperative fever, postoperative pain needing analgesic and slight ureteral mucosal injury were 5.11%, 8.22% and 7.78%, respectively. None of patient suffered from severe complications, such as sepsis or ureteral perforation. CONCLUSION: It's practical and suitable for the vast majority of adult patients to undergo FURL in single session with 11/13Fr suctioning UAS without preoperative stenting. FURL with 11/13Fr suctioning UAS and 8.55Fr SDFU is feasible, reliable, safe, and efficient in the management of renal stone and upper ureteral stone.

Postoperative Renal Abscess Following Tip-Flexible Suctioning Ureteral Access Sheath and Digital Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND The tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath (TFS-UAS) can be bent under flexible ureteroscopes, which facilitates removal of renal stone segments by irrigation and suctioning effects. Small-scale comparative studies found it safer and more efficacious than traditional UAS. However, complications such as renal abscess were not documented after TFS-UAS combined with digital FURS. CASE REPORT A 57-year-old woman had right lumbar pain that persisted for 1 year. A plain computed tomography (CT) scan revealed multiple renal pelvicalyceal stones (maximum diameter 20×9 mm). She was admitted to undergo elective surgery with a TFS-UAS combined with digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The operation was deemed successful and she was given postoperative antibiotics for 2 days before discharge. Eight postoperative days later, she was admitted to the emergency department due to high fever (39.6°C). Plain CT revealed intact double-J stents and no abnormalities. She was readmitted to the urological department to receive antibiotic therapy, which progressed to septic shock (blood pressure 80/50 mmHg) and required immediate transfer to the intensive care unit. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed a right renal abscess. She was promptly resuscitated and given stronger antibiotics. She recovered well and was discharged with 2-week oral levofloxacin treatment. Follow-up ultrasound found no renal abscess. CONCLUSIONS While TFS-UAS with digital FURs is an effective approach for multiple renal stones, there is a risk of postoperative renal abscess, possibly due to altered intrarenal pressure.

An experimental study on flow behaviour of pharmaceutical powders during suction filling.

Die filling is a crucial step in the pharmaceutical tablet manufacturing process. For industrial-scale production using rotary presses, suction filling is typically employed due to its significant efficiency advantages over gravity filling. Despite its widespread use, our understanding of the suction filling process remains limited. Specifically, there is insufficient comprehension of how filling performance is influenced by factors such as suction velocity, filling velocity, and the properties of the powder materials. Building on our previous research, this study aims to further investigate the effects of powder properties and process parameters (e.g., filling velocity, suction velocity, fill depth) on suction filling behaviour. A systematic experimental investigation was conducted using a model suction filling system, considering both cohesive and free-flowing pharmaceutical powders. The effect of fill depth on suction filling of these powders was examined at different filling and suction velocities. The results demonstrate that two distinctive flow regimes for suction filling can be identified: slow filling and fast filling. These regimes are delineated by a critical filling-to-suction velocity ratio. In the slow filling regime, the filling-to-suction velocity ratio is lower than the critical ratio, meaning that the filling phase is slower than the suction phase. Conversely, the fast filling regime occurs when the filling-to-suction velocity ratio exceeds the critical ratio, implying that the filling phase is faster than the suction phase. This study reveals, for the first time, that when the powder flow pattern during suction filling is dominated by plug flow, full die fill (i.e., the fill ratio equals unity) is achieved in the slow filling regime. However, in the fast filling regime, incomplete die fill is obtained. It is also found that when plug flow prevails during fast filling, the fill ratio has an inverse correlation with the filling-to-suction velocity ratio. This study further reveals that when the plug flow assumption is valid, the filling ratio at various fill-to-suction velocity ratios can be well predicted mathematically. Furthermore, it is also found that once the powder flow pattern differs from the ideal plug flow, which could be induced by the filling conditions and powder cohesion, the fill ratio can be overpredicted.

Effect of Filtered Blood Return on Outcomes of Pulmonary Aspiration Thrombectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of filtered blood reinfusion (FBR) on procedural outcomes of aspiration thrombectomy for pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 171 patients who underwent aspiration thrombectomy for intermediate-high-risk or high-risk PE between December 2018 and September 2022 were included, 84 of whom underwent thrombectomy with FBR and 87 without. Demographic data, vital signs, laboratory values, procedural details, pulmonary arterial pressures, transfusion needs, length of hospital stay, and procedure-related adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: The groups did not differ at baseline, other than the FBR cohort having a higher percentage of women. There was no significant difference in postprocedural vital signs or pulmonary arterial pressure. Mean fluoroscopy time and volume of contrast medium used were lower in the FBR cohort. The drop in hemoglobin level was lower in the FBR group at both 12 (FBR, -1.065; No FBR, -1.742; P > .001) and 24 hours (FBR, -1.526; No FBR, -2.380; P > .001) after procedure; accordingly, fewer patients required transfusions in the FBR cohort (FBR, 8 (9.5%); No FBR, 20 (23.0%); P = .016). There was no difference in the number or severity of adverse events or duration of intensive care unit or hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: FBR use during aspiration pulmonary thrombectomy reduced blood loss and transfusion requirements but had no significant effect on procedural success or adverse event rates.

The Predictive Value of Qanadli and Miller Index Scores in Patients with Intermediate-High-Risk and High-Risk Pulmonary Emboli Undergoing Aspiration Thrombectomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between clot burden and pulmonary artery pressures in patients undergoing suction thromboembolectomy for high-risk and intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism with secondary outcomes of 30-day mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board (IRB) exemption was granted for this retrospective study. The charts of 120 consecutive patients who underwent mechanical thromboembolectomy using the Flowtriever system (Inari Medical, Irvine, California) between February 2020 and August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed, and the following data were collected: (a) preprocedural B-type natriuretic peptide and creatinine levels, (b) echocardiographic findings, (c) preprocedural and postprocedural pulmonary artery pressures, (d) ICU length of stay, and (e) 30-day mortality. Clot burden was scored using Qanadli and Miller indices and correlated with the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 120 patients who underwent thromboembolectomy, pulmonary artery pressures and diagnostic-quality angiograms were available in 109 patients. In the 109 patients with adequate data, Qanadli, preprocedural Miller, and postprocedural Miller scores correlated with pulmonary artery pressures. Neither was independently associated with ICU length of stay. Freedom from 30-day mortality was 91%, and embolism-specific mortality was 92%. All-risk and high-risk patients who survived demonstrated a significantly lower preprocedural and postprocedural Miller score, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombus burden as measured by the Qanadli and Miller scores appeared to be correlated with pulmonary artery pressures. Furthermore, catheter-directed thromboembolectomy led to a reduction in Miller scores, which appeared to be correlated with a reduction in pulmonary pressures. In high-risk patients, a reduced postprocedural Miller score and pulmonary pressure demonstrated improved 30-day survival. Further investigation into the association between Miller scores and patient mortality is warranted to stratify patients who would benefit from emergency intervention.