Cosmetic considerations after breast cancer treatment.

Treatments for breast cancer can have an array of adverse effects, including hair loss, scarring, and irritated skin. These physical outcomes can, in turn, lead to body image concerns, anxiety, and depression. Fortunately, there is growing evidence that certain cosmetic therapies can improve patient self-image. Here we review various cosmetic treatment options including hair camouflage, eyebrow and eyelash camouflage, treatments for hirsutism, nipple and areola tattooing, post-mastectomy scar tattooing, treatments for dry skin/xerosis, removal of post-radiation telangiectasias, and lightening of post-radiation hyperpigmentation. For each patient concern, we report potential procedures, clinical evidence of impact on quality of life, special considerations, and safety concerns. This article aims to equip dermatologists with resources so that they may effectively counsel breast cancer survivors who express treatment-related cosmetic concerns.

Think of ink: Tattoo pigment masquerading as a breast mass.

Migration of tattoo pigment to axillary lymph nodes mimicking calcifications is a recognized phenomenon, however, pigment in an intra-mammary node masquerading as a breast mass is a rare complication of cosmetic tattoos. As the prevalence of tattooing increases among women presenting to Breastscreen, radiologists may expect to encounter this lesion mimicking a breast neoplasm. We present a 50-year-old female with extensive tattoos on her arms, chest wall and abdomen, recalled for a small calcified breast mass on her first screening mammogram. Tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy demonstrated intra-mammary lymph node with abundant tattoo pigment.

Unveiling the Temporal Aspect of MRI Tattoo Reactions: A Prospective Evaluation of a Newly-Acquired Tattoo with Multiple MRI Scans.

BACKGROUND Over the past 30 years, painful reactions during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in tattooed individuals have been sporadically reported. These complications manifest as burning pain in tattooed skin areas, occasionally with swelling and redness, often leading to termination of the scanning. The exact cause is unclear, but iron oxide pigments in permanent make-up or elements in carbon black tattoos may play a role. Additionally, factors like tattoo age, design, and color may influence reactions. The existing literature lacks comprehensive evidence, leaving many questions unanswered. CASE REPORT We present the unique case of a young man who experienced recurring painful reactions in a recently applied black tattoo during multiple MRI scans. Despite the absence of ferrimagnetic ingredients in the tattoo ink, the patient reported intense burning sensations along with transient erythema and edema. Interestingly, the severity of these reactions gradually decreased over time, suggesting a time-dependent factor contributing to the problem. This finding highlights the potential influence of pigment particle density in the skin on the severity and risk of MRI interactions. We hypothesize that the painful sensations could be triggered by excitation of dermal C-fibers by conductive elements in the tattoo ink, likely carbon particles. CONCLUSIONS Our case study highlights that MRI-induced tattoo reactions may gradually decrease over time. While MRI scans occasionally can cause transient reactions in tattoos, they do not result in permanent skin damage and remain a safe and essential diagnostic tool. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms behind these reactions and explore preventive measures.

Features of tattoo-associated cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia on reflectance confocal microscopy and line-field confocal optical coherence tomography.

The popularity of tattoos has led to an increase in associated skin reactions, including complications such as infection, allergic reactions and rare conditions such as tattoo-induced cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia (CLH). CLH is a benign lymphoproliferative reaction with clinical features resembling malignant cutaneous lymphomas. Non-invasive diagnostic tools like reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and the new line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) are being studied in dermatology better to understand the morphological patterns of many dermatological diseases. Between September 2021 and May 2023, patients with suspicious lesions for tattoo-related CLH were analysed using RCM and LC-OCT before confirming the diagnosis of CLH through skin biopsy and histopathological examination. The study included five cases of CLH. It focused on the analysis of high-quality LC-OCT images/videos and RCM images to investigate the features of CLH in tattooed individuals. Most (80%) cases exhibited a mixed T and B lymphocyte infiltration subtype, while 20% showed a predominant T infiltration subtype. RCM and LC-OCT revealed characteristic features, including architectural disarray, fibrosis, lymphoid infiltrates, and pigment deposits in the epidermis and dermis. Non-invasive tools such as RCM and LC-OCT are valuable in diagnosing tattoo-related CLH. While skin biopsy remains the current standard for diagnosis, RCM and LC-OCT can serve as helpful adjuncts in identifying the most representative area for biopsy. They may potentially become alternative diagnostic options in the future, offering benefits in terms of cost, diagnostic efficiency, aesthetics and patient satisfaction as the prevalence of tattoo-related adverse reactions continues to rise.

Tattoos: risks and complications, clinical and histopathological approach.

BACKGROUND: Skin modification through tattoos is as old as humanity itself. However, this trend is on the rise, and with the use of different types of pigments and application practices, both cutaneous and systemic complications can arise. Adverse reactions can be grouped into five classes: inflammatory, infectious, neoplastic, aesthetic, and miscellaneous. On histopathology, inflammatory reactions can exhibit a lichenoid pattern or present as spongiotic dermatitis, granulomatous reactions, pseudolymphoma, pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia, or scleroderma/morphea-like changes. This article reviews tattoo complications, including their clinical and histopathological characteristics. METHODS: An open search was conducted on PubMed using the terms "tattoo", "complications", and "skin". No limits were set for period, language, or publication type of the articles. RESULTS: Reactions to tattoos are reported in up to 67% of people who get tattooed, with papulonodular and granulomatous reactions being the most common. Some neoplastic complications have been described, but their causality is still debated. Any pigment can cause adverse reactions, although red ink is more frequently associated with them. Patients with pre-existing dermatoses may experience exacerbation or complications of their diseases when getting tattoos; therefore, this procedure is not recommended for this patient group. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatological consultation is recommended before getting a tattoo, as well as a histopathological examination in case of complications. In patients who develop cutaneous inflammatory reactions following tattooing, additional studies are recommended to investigate systemic diseases such as sarcoidosis, pyoderma gangrenosum, atopic dermatitis, and neoplasms. It is important for physicians to be trained in providing appropriate care in case of complications.

Retrospective clinical evaluation of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser safety and efficacy in tattoo removal: A new perspective on the Kirby-Desai scale.

BACKGROUND: With nearly 50% of the population in the United States, Italy, and Sweden tattooed with at least one tattoo, the demand for its removal has risen by 32% since 2011. Traditional removal methods, such as Q-switched (QS) laser-based tattoo removal, can be lengthy, requiring up to 20 sessions. AIM: This study presents a retrospective clinical evaluation of seven short-pulsed QS, dual-wavelength Nd:YAG laser, as an efficient alternative, that can potentially reduce the number of sessions needed as calculated by a founded scale. METHODS: The QS modality delivers high-intensity pulses in four wavelengths, ideal for removing multicolored tattoos, of which two were used. We studied 11 patients who underwent 3-8 treatments (average 5.09) every 2-3 months. Each tattoo was assessed using the Kirby-Desai scale, considering the following factors: location, Fitzpatrick skin type, ink amount, layering, scarring, tissue changes, and tattoo color. Follow-ups were conducted after 6 months and at 4-5 years following last session. RESULTS: The long-term follow-up presented a significantly higher tattoo removal efficiency than the short-term follow-up (p < 0.001), indicating a sustained process of ink breakdown and elimination. Notably, the actual number of treatments were significantly lower than that predicted by the Kirby-Desai scale (average 5.09 vs. 9.9, p < 0.001). No severe adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the QS Nd:YAG laser offers a safe and effective alternative for tattoo removal, requiring fewer treatments than initially expected.

"Tattoo Characteristics and Testing for Body Dysmorphic Disorder: An Internet-based Self-questionnaire Survey of 4,809 Individuals with Tattoos".

Tattoos have become very popular worldwide in recent years. The aim of this study was to analyse a group of people interested in having tattoos, and screen them for body image disturbances. This cross-sectional self-administered internet-based survey included 4,809 individuals interesting in having tattoos. The majority of the study population were female (79.1%). The survey was conducted using a self-created questionnaire and the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire - Dermatology version. Most tattoos in the study group were located on the forearms and hands (28.1%). The most popular motifs were plants (17.5%) and animals (16.9%). Out of 4,809 individuals, 19.9% had problems with acceptance of some parts of their body and 9.8% were screened for body dysmorphic disorder with the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire - Dermatology version. Four percent of individuals reported that tattoos helped to improve their own perception of the appearance of their body by distracting attention from the other problems. Limitations of this study include possible participant selection bias and the overrepresentation of women. In conclusion, clinicians may expect to see more patients with tattoos and, of these, approximately 10% may be screened for body dysmorphic disorder.

Tattoo-induced allergic contact dermatitis presents diagnostic challenge as a cellulitis mimic.

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a prevalent condition associated with numerous potential allergen exposures. Tattoo ink is variable and may contain allergens that can be overlooked in patient education and diagnosis. We present a 27-year-old female with ACD following a new tattoo. The patient was repeatedly misdiagnosed with cellulitis by three different clinicians and treated with multiple antibiotics without improvement. The correct diagnosis was eventually made in the emergency department (ED). Although the patient was aware of her allergies to nickel and cobalt from patch testing, she was not aware of the potential for tattoo ink to contain these allergens because prior tattoos had not provoked an allergic reaction. Consequently, the appropriate care was delayed by a month, resulting in significant morbidity. This case demonstrates the potential for ACD to present similarly to cellulitis in an ED setting and the need for clinical vigilance in diagnosis of ACD. It also highlights the importance of detailed patient education on potential allergen sources particularly in the context of tattooing, which is performed with unregulated and variable ink products.