Research on safety strategies for nucleic acid testing in sudden epidemic conditions based on a SEIARD dynamic model.

Infectious diseases have caused enormous disasters in human society, and asymptomatic carriers are an important challenge in our epidemic prevention and control process. Nucleic acid testing has played an important role in rapid testing for asymptomatic individuals. How to carry out nucleic acid testing in a scientific manner is a practical problem encountered in normal production and life. Based on the real COVID-19 epidemic data from Shanghai, we established a susceptible-exposed-infected-asymptomatic-recovered-death (SEIARD) dynamic model. The least squares method was used to fit the data and estimate the unknown parameters ß and E(0) in the model, and MATLAB software was employed to simulate the development of the epidemic. The data fitting results indicated that the SEIARD model can better describe the early development patterns of the epidemic (R2 = 0.98; MAPE = 2.54%). We calculated the basic reproduction number of the Shanghai epidemic as R0 = 2.86. As the frequency of nucleic acid testing increased, the basic reproduction number R0 continued to decrease. When there is one latent carrier and one asymptomatic carrier in the nucleic acid testing team, the number of queues is directly proportional to the number of infected individuals, the nucleic acid testing team increases by 50 people, and the number of new asymptomatic cases increases by approximately 4 people. If both susceptible individuals (S) and asymptomatic patients (A) are not wearing masks, the infection rate reaches approximately 7%; after wearing masks, the final infection rate is less than 1% at 1.5 m between two people. The queue spacing is inversely proportional to the number of infected individuals. With a distance of d = 1 m, a nucleic acid testing team of 100 people added 8% of the infected individuals; when d = 1.5 m, fewer than 2% of the newly infected individuals. The results confirmed that controlling the queue size for nucleic acid testing, strictly wearing masks, and maintaining a queue spacing of more than 1.5 m are safe and effective nucleic acid testing strategies. Our findings are also applicable to the prevention of other newly emerging infectious diseases.

A colorimetric reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification method targeting the L452R mutation to detect the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2.

The rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has triggered global difficulties for both individuals and economies, with new variants continuing to emerge. The Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 remains most prevalent worldwide, and it affects the efficacy of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. Expedited testing to detect the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 and monitor viral transmission is necessary. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a colorimetric reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) technique targeting the L452R mutation in the S gene for the specific detection of the Delta variant. In the test, positivity was indicated as a color change from purple to yellow. The assay's 95% limit of detection was 57 copies per reaction for the L452R (U1355G)-specific standard plasmid. Using 126 clinical samples, our assay displayed 100% specificity, 97.06% sensitivity, and 98.41% accuracy in identifying the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 compared to real-time RT-PCR. To our knowledge, this is the first colorimetric RT-LAMP assay that can differentiate the Delta variant from its generic SARS-CoV-2, enabling it as an approach for studying COVID-19 demography and facilitating proper effective control measure establishment to fight against the reemerging variants of SARS-CoV-2 in the future.

Æ©S COVID-19 is a rapid high throughput and sensitive one-step quadruplex real-time RT-PCR assay.

Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), a standard method recommended for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requires 2-4 h to get the result. Although antigen test kit (ATK) is used for COVID-19 screening within 15-30 min, the drawback is its limited sensitivity. Hence, a rapid one-step quadruplex real-time RT-PCR assay: termed Æ©S COVID-19 targeting ORF1ab, ORF3a, and N genes of SARS-CoV-2; and Avocado sunblotch viroid (ASBVd) as an internal control was developed. Based on strategies including designing high melting temperature primers with short amplicons, applying a fast ramp rate, minimizing hold time, and reducing the range between denaturation and annealing/extension temperatures; the assay could be accomplished within 25 min. The limit of detection of ORF1ab, ORF3a, and N genes were 1.835, 1.310, and 1 copy/reaction, respectively. Validation was performed in 205 combined nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 92.8%, 100%, 100%, and 97.1%, respectively with 96.7% accuracy. Cohen's Kappa was 0.93. The newly developed rapid real-time RT-PCR assay was highly sensitive, specific, and fast, making it suitable for use as an alternative method to support laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19 in outpatient and emergency departments.

RT-qPCR Testing and Performance Metrics in the COVID-19 Era.

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the crucial role of diagnostic testing in managing infectious diseases, particularly through the use of reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) tests. RT-qPCR has been pivotal in detecting and quantifying viral RNA, enabling the identification and management of SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, despite its widespread use, there remains a notable gap in understanding fundamental diagnostic metrics such as sensitivity and specificity among many scientists and healthcare practitioners. This gap is not merely academic; it has profound implications for interpreting test results, making public health decisions, and affecting patient outcomes. This review aims to clarify the distinctions between laboratory- and field-based metrics in the context of RT-qPCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 and summarise the global efforts that led to the development and optimisation of these tests during the pandemic. It is intended to enhance the understanding of these fundamental concepts among scientists and healthcare professionals who may not be familiar with the nuances of diagnostic test evaluation. Such knowledge is crucial for accurately interpreting test results, making informed public health decisions, and ultimately managing infectious disease outbreaks more effectively.

An at-home and electro-free COVID-19 rapid test based on colorimetric RT-LAMP.

INTRODUCTION: In the fight against virus-caused pandemics like COVID-19, diagnostic tests based on RT-qPCR are essential, but they are sometimes limited by their dependence on expensive, specialized equipment and skilled personnel. Consequently, an alternative nucleic acid detection technique that overcomes these restrictions, called loop-mediated isothermal amplification following reverse transcription (RT-LAMP), has been broadly investigated. Nevertheless, the developed RT-LAMP assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection still require laboratory devices and electrical power, limiting their widespread use as rapid home tests. This work developed a flexible RT-LAMP assay that gets beyond the drawbacks of the available isothermal LAMP-based SARS-CoV-2 detection, establishing a simple and effective at-home diagnostic tool for COVID-19. METHODOLOGY: A multiplex direct RT-LAMP assay, modified from the previously developed test was applied to simultaneously identify the two genes of SARS-CoV-2. We used a colorimetric readout, lyophilized reagents, and benchmarked an electro-free and micropipette-free method that enables sensitive and specific detection of SARS-CoV-2 in home settings. RESULTS: Forty-one nasopharyngeal swab samples were tested using the developed home-testing RT-LAMP (HT-LAMP) assay, showing 100% agreement with the RT-qPCR results. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first electrically independent RT-LAMP assay successfully developed for SARS-CoV-2 detection in a home setting. Our HT-LAMP assay is thus an important development for diagnosing COVID-19 or any other infectious pandemic on a population scale.

An alternative colorimetric RT-LAMP assay for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2: development and validation in Thailand.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19, an emerging infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, continues to be a global public health threat. The development of a colorimetric reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) can extend the availability of simple, reliable molecular tests for the rapid detection of COVID-19. METHODOLOGY: The RT-LAMP assay was developed using a new primer set targeting a portion of SARS-CoV-2 orf8. The method was validated at 63 ºC for 60 minutes with naked-eye visualization of the color change. The clinical performance was compared to a real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR) using 273 RNA samples extracted from nasopharyngeal swab specimens. RESULTS: The developed RT-LAMP was specific to SARS-CoV-2 with a limit of detection at 15 RNA copies per reaction. The assay demonstrated diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 90.48% (95% CI: 86.36-93.68%), 87.00% (95% CI: 81.53-91.33%), 100% (95% CI: 95.07-100%), 100% (95% CI: not available), and 73.74% (95% CI: 66.22-80.07%), respectively, compared to the rtRT-PCR. The greatest sensitivity of 98.03% (95% CI: 94.34-99.59%) was demonstrated in samples with the cycle threshold (Ct) values < 30 cycles. CONCLUSIONS: The RT-LAMP method in this study showed good performance. The assay can increase the scope of laboratory testing for rapidly detecting SARS-CoV-2 in Thailand. Due to a decrease in COVID-19 cases, its application is beneficial when commercial alternatives are unavailable.

Comparison of RT-PCR cycle threshold values between individual and pooled SARS-CoV-2 infected nasopharyngeal swab specimens.

The molecular reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing of respiratory tract swabs has become mandatory to confirm the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, RT-PCR tests are expensive, require standardized equipment, and relatively long testing times, and the sample pooling method has been introduced to solve this issue. The aim of this study was to compare the cycle threshold (Ct) values of the individual sample and pooled sample methods to assess how accurate the pooling method was. Repeat RT-PCR examinations were initially performed to confirm the Ct values for each sample before running the pooled test procedure. Sample extraction and amplification were performed in both assays to detect ORF1ab, N, and E genes with a cut-off point value of Ct <38. Overall, there was no difference in Ct values between individual sample and pooled sample groups at all concentrations (p=0.259) and for all pooled sizes. Only pooled size of five could detect the Ct value in the pooled samples for all concentration samples, including low-concentration sample (Ct values 36 to 38). This study highlighted that pooled RT-PCR testing strategy did not reduce the quality of individually measured RT-PCR Ct values. A pool size of five could provide a practical technique to expand the screening capacity of RT-PCR.

SARS-CoV-2 not Detected in the Nasopharyngeal Sample but in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection typically relies on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technology. However, there is a certain rate of missed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal samples, particularly among immunosuppressed individuals. METHODS: In this case, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in nasopharyngeal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) using RT-PCR. Pulmonary imaging was performed using computed tomography (CT). Patient clinical data were retrieved from the Laboratory Information System (LIS). RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 was negative in two nasopharyngeal tests of the patient, but was finally detected in BALF, confirming that the lung lesions were infected by SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSIONS: In the post-epidemic era, it is necessary to use BALF to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection in cases where other factors have been ruled out in immunosuppressed individuals with pulmonary infections, especially when the nasopharyngeal test yields a negative result.

From Lab to Home: Ultrasensitive Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 with a Cascade CRISPR/Cas13a-Cas12a System Based Lateral Flow Assay.

Currently, CRISPR/Cas-based molecular diagnostic techniques usually rely on the introduction of nucleic acid amplification to improve their sensitivity, which is usually more time-consuming, susceptible to aerosol contamination, and therefore not suitable for at-home molecular testing. In this research, we developed an advanced CRISPR/Cas13a-Cas12a-based lateral flow assay that facilitated the ultrasensitive and rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA directly from samples, without the need for nucleic acid amplification. This method was called CRISPR LFA enabling at-home RNA testing (CLEAR). CLEAR used a novel cascade mechanism with specially designed probes that fold into hairpin structures, enabling visual detection of SARS-CoV-2 sequences down to 1 aM sensitivity levels. More importantly, CLEAR had a positive coincidence rate of 100% and a negative coincidence rate of 100% for clinical nasopharyngeal swabs from 16 patients. CLEAR was particularly suitable for at-home molecular testing, providing a low-cost, user-friendly solution that can efficiently distinguish between different SARS-CoV-2 variants. CLEAR overcame the common limitations of high sensitivity and potential contamination associated with traditional PCR-based systems, making it a promising tool for widespread public health application, especially in environments with limited access to laboratory resources.

SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy: clinical characteristics and vertical transmission in a referral hospital in Peru. / Infección por SARS-CoV-2 en el embarazo: características clínicas y trasmisión vertical en un hospital de referencia de Perú.

Motivation for the study. There is a gap in knowledge about vertical transmission of SARS- CoV-2 and its implications for maternal and neonatal health, despite evidence of multisystem involvement in pregnant women with COVID-19. Main findings. The study results suggest low incidence of vertical transmission during pregnancy, with only one PCR-positive case in the placenta and one asymptomatic neonate. Implications. Our results can inform strategies for prevention and management of COVID-19 in pregnant women, as well as guide the development of health policies aimed at protecting maternal and neonatal health during the pandemic. The aim of this study was to analyze the vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant women with COVID-19 in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of the Edgardo Rebagliati Martins National Hospital (HNERM). Twelve pregnant women who met the inclusion criteria were included. Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) tests for SARS-CoV-2 were performed when each woman was admitted to the hospital, placenta samples were collected for pathological evaluation as well. The results showed that vertical transmission of the virus was rare, with an overall low positivity rate in newborns. Although the study has limitations, such as the small number of cases and the lack of electron microscope analysis, it is the first attempt to evaluate vertical transmission in Peru. It is concluded that more research is needed to better understand the relationship between COVID-19 infection and complications during pregnancy.

Se realizó un estudio en el departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia del Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins (HNERM) con el objetivo analizar la transmisión vertical del SARS-CoV-2 en mujeres embarazadas con COVID-19. Se incluyeron 12 gestantes que cumplían con los criterios de inclusión. Se realizaron pruebas diagnósticas de PCR en tiempo real (RT-PCR) para SARS-CoV-2 durante la admisión de cada gestante y se recolectaron muestras de placenta para su evaluación anatomopatológica. Los resultados mostraron que la transmisión vertical del virus fue poco común, con una tasa general de positividad baja en los recién nacidos. Aunque el estudio presenta limitaciones, como el número reducido de casos y la falta de análisis con microscopio electrónico, constituye el primer intento en Perú de evaluar la transmisión vertical. Se concluye que se necesita más investigación para comprender mejor la relación entre la infección por la COVID-19 y las complicaciones durante el embarazo. Motivación para realizar el estudio. A pesar de la evidencia de una afectación multisistémica en mujeres embarazadas con la COVID-19, existe un vacío de conocimiento sobre la transmisión vertical del virus y sus implicancias en la salud materna y neonatal. Principales hallazgos. Los resultados del estudio sugieren una baja incidencia de transmisión vertical durante el embarazo, con solo un caso positivo de PCR en la placenta y un neonato asintomático. Implicancias. Este resultado pueden informar las estrategias de prevención y manejo de la COVID-19 en mujeres embarazadas, así como guiar el desarrollo de políticas sanitarias dirigidas a proteger la salud materna y neonatal durante la pandemia.

Enhancing efficiency in detection of COVID-19 through AI-driven colorimetric isothermal detection with multiplex primers.

COVID-19 has afflicted millions of lives worldwide. Although there are many rapid methods to detect it based on colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification, there remains room for improvement. This study aims to 1) integrate multiple primers into a singleplex assay to enhance the diagnostic sensitivity, and 2) utilize a high-throughput smartphone-operatable AI-driven color reading tool to enable a rapid result analysis. This setup can improve the sensitivity by 10-100 times and can analyze approximately 6700 samples per minute. The assay is simpler than RT-qPCR, with a turnaround time of less than 75 min. It can detect various types of SARS-CoV-2 by targeting 3 genes, increasing the likelihood that it will remain effective even if the virus undergoes mutations in any single target gene. In summary, it affords potential for adaptation to detection of new/re-emerging diseases with the visual readout for maximum assay simplicity and AI-operated mode for large-scale testing.

Diagnosis with Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) technology and real-time PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron detection using various nasopharyngeal swabs in SARS-CoV-2 Omicron.

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, with the main subtypes BA.5.2 and BF.7 in China, led to off-target effects on the S and N genes from December 1, 2022, to January 31, 2023. The kits used for studying and developing these agents were not adequately and independently evaluated. It is important to verify the performance of commercial Real-Time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) tests. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a clinical evaluation of two Real Time SARS-CoV-2 Omicron assays to verify their performance using various detection reagents and clinical specimens. METHODS: We performed clinical evaluations of two existing Chinese SARS-CoV-2 Omicron RT-qPCR kits 2019-nCoV nucleic acid diagnostic kits (Fosun Biotechnology, National instrument registration 20203400299, Shanghai, China) and COVID-19 nucleic acid detection kits (eDiagnosis Biomedicine, National instrument registration 20203400212, Wuhan, China) and using BSD (Bondson) (Guangzhou Bondson Biotechnology Co. Ltd, batch number 2022101), quality controls provided by the inspection center and a large number of clinically confirmed specimens. RESULTS: The concordance rates for the Fosun and eDiagnosis kits were 95% and 100%, respectively. The detection limit for the Fosun and eDiagnosis kits was verified to be 300 copies/mL and 500 copies/mL. The Fosun assay exhibited the largest coefficient of variation (CV) for ORF1ab and N gene at the detection limit concentration (4.80%, 3.49%), whereas eDiagnosis showed a smaller CV (0.93%, 1.10%). In the reference product from the Hangzhou Clinical Laboratory Center test, it was found that Fosun had the lowest sensitivity of 93.47% and a specificity of 100%, while eDiagnosis exhibited 100% for both sensitivity and specificity. The lowest single target gene detection rate of Fosun reagents was 68.7% for the ORF1ab gene and 87.5% for the N gene, while eDiagnosis detection rate was 100%. Among the clinical group S specimens, the missed detection rate of the Fosun reagent was 10.9%, which was higher than the 3.9% of eDiagnosis. However, there was no significant difference in the clinical diagnostic efficiency of the two reagents. CONCLUSIONS: The ORF1ab and N assays of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron on the eDiagnosis platform yielded higher values compared to those on the Fosun platform. Consequently, the eDiagnosis kit has also been used as standard detection reagents. Considering that the Fosun reagent has a relatively low detection limit and targets three single genes, it is more advantageous as a confirmatory reagent for the new museum.

Quadruplex Droplet Digital PCR Assay for Screening and Quantification of SARS-CoV-2.

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the rapid global spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) since early 2020, has highlighted the need for sensitive and reliable diagnostic methods. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has demonstrated superior performance over the gold-standard reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) in detecting SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we explored the development of a multiplex ddPCR assay that enables sensitive quantification of SARS-CoV-2, which could be utilized for antiviral screening and the monitoring of COVID-19 patients. We designed a quadruplex ddPCR assay targeting four SARS-CoV-2 genes and evaluated its performance in terms of specificity, sensitivity, linearity, reproducibility, and precision using a two-color ddPCR detection system. The results showed that the quadruplex assay had comparable limits of detection and accuracy to the simplex ddPCR assays. Importantly, the quadruplex assay demonstrated significantly improved performance for samples with low viral loads and ambiguous results compared to the standard qRT-PCR approach. The developed multiplex ddPCR represents a valuable alternative and complementary tool for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 and potentially other pathogens in various application scenarios beyond the current COVID-19 pandemic. The improved sensitivity and reliability of this assay could contribute to more effective disease monitoring and antiviral screening during the ongoing public health crisis.

Evaluation of a commercial Real Time PCR for clinical samples without RNA extraction for detection of SARS-CoV-2.

RT-PCR is the gold standard for diagnosis of COVID-19. All RT-PCR kits are based on RNA extraction from the clinical sample. There was a sudden increase in demand of these kits, both RNA extraction and COVID-19 RT-PCR kits during the pandemic. This sudden spurt in global demand created a situation of shortage of consumables, especially the RNA extraction kits. Hence, this study was carried out to evaluate and compare COVID-19 RT-PCR without RNA extraction step using buffer R3. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of RT-PCR kit without RNA extraction were 89.16 %, 100% and 89.6% respectively. This approach saved more than 50 % time compared to the RT-PCR kit with RNA extraction approach allowing enhanced daily sample processing capability. RT-PCR kit without RNA extraction help in managing a greater number of samples, reduces cost and turnaround time.

Evaluation of STANDARD™ M10 SARS-CoV-2 from bronchoalveolar lavage samples.

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is considered as a promising alternative method to detect COVID-19 infection. STANDARD™ M10 SARS-CoV-2 assay on 150 negative and 50 positives BAL samples for SARS-CoV-2 showed 96 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity compared to Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 assay and a 31.25 genomic copies/mL limit of detection.

Nested PCR effective to detect low viral loads of SARS-CoV-2 in animal samples.

SARS-CoV-2 emerged from an animal source and was then transmitted to humans, causing the COVID-19 pandemic. Since a wide range of animals are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, the zoonotic potential of SARS-CoV-2 increases with every new animal infected. The molecular gold standard assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection is real-time RT-PCR, where the Ct obtained is proportional to the amount of nucleic acid and can be a semi-quantitative measure of the viral load. However, since the use of real-time RT-PCR assays in animal samples is low due to the high costs, the use of validated nested PCR assays will help to monitor large-scale animal samplings, by reducing the costs of detection. In the present study, 140 samples from dogs and cats (15 SARS-CoV-2-positive samples with Ct values from 27 to 33, and 125 negative samples), previously analyzed by real-time RT-PCR, were analyzed by nested PCR. To increase the number of positive samples to determine the sensitivity of the assay, 40 human samples obtained during COVID-19 diagnosis in 2020 were included. The specificity of the primers was analyzed against samples positive to canine coronavirus (CCV) and feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV). To calculate the limit of detection (LoD) of the nested PCR, the viral load was estimated extrapolating the Ct value obtained by real-time RT-PCR. The Ct values obtained were considered as semi-quantitative and were able to distinguish between high, moderate and low viral loads. The Kappa value or "agreement" between assays and reliability of the nested PCR were also determined. Eleven of the animal samples analyzed by nested PCR targeting the N gene were detected as positive, while 129 were detected as negative to the virus, with Ct values ranging between17 and 31.5. All the samples from humans analyzed by nested PCR were positive. These results indicate that the assay has a sensitivity of near 95 % and a specificity of 100 %. No unspecific reactions analyzed by nested PCR were observed with the samples positive to CCV and FIPV. The samples detected as positive to SARS-CoV-2 by nested PCR were those that presented a Ct between17 and 31.5. The LoD of the nested PCR was estimated close to 50 copies/µL of viral load, corresponding with a Ct of 31.5. The Kappa value between assays was excellent (k = 0.829). The results obtained demonstrate that nested PCR is useful to detect SARS-CoV-2 low viral loads at a lower cost than with real-time RT-PCR.

Progress of the Detection Methods for SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: The severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes a respiratory illness, characterized by symptoms such as fever, dry cough, and drowsiness. This virus is highly contagious, has significant mutation rates, and induces infection despite vaccination. Its widespread prevalence has profoundly impacted global economies, societies, and daily life. In response to these challenges, researchers have committed themselves to advancing rapid and cost-effective diagnostic technologies, holding substantial importance for the rapid evolution of global diagnostic capabilities. Nonetheless, various detection methods diverge in principles, sensitivity, specificity, and other aspects. Additionally, COVID-19 is not an isolated event, but part of a broader history of pandemics in human society. Therefore, this article briefly reviews the existing detection methods of SARS-CoV-2, providing valuable technical insights to diagnose not only SARS-CoV-2 but also other viruses. METHODS: A search was conducted on PubMed by utilizing keywords such as "SARS-CoV-2 detection", "RT-qPCR detection for SARS-CoV-2", "LFA detection for SARS-CoV-2", "Biosensors detection for SARS-CoV-2", and similar terms. The objective was to compile and summarize relevant articles on these topics. RESULTS: Currently, the real-time reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) stands as a widely employed method for detecting SARS-CoV-2, enabling an accurate detection of viral RNA. Furthermore, the lateral flow assay (LFA) assists in detecting viral antigens and antibodies. Gene sequencing technology primarily facilitates the real-time monitoring of mutated SARS-CoV-2 strains, while biosensors could offer a rapid, economical, sensitive, and precise detection of SARS-CoV-2. These methods provide a strong technical support for the early detection and diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSIONS: This paper offers a concise overview of pathogen detection methods, as molecular biology, and immunological detection techniques, alongside emerging biosensor platforms relevant to SARS-CoV-2, and delineates the strengths and weaknesses of each method.

Effect of testing criteria for infectious disease surveillance: The case of COVID-19 in Norway.

During the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway, the testing criteria and capacity changed numerous times. In this study, we aim to assess consequences of changes in testing criteria for infectious disease surveillance. We plotted the proportion of positive PCR tests and the total number of PCR tests for different periods of the pandemic in Norway. We fitted regression models for the total number of PCR tests and the probability of positive PCR tests, with time and weekday as explanatory variables. The regression analysis focuses on the time period until 2021, i.e. before Norway started vaccination. There were clear changes in testing criteria and capacity over time. In particular, there was a marked difference in the testing regime before and after the introduction of self-testing, with a drastic increase in the proportion of positive PCR tests after the introduction of self-tests. The probability of a PCR test being positive was higher for weekends and public holidays than for Mondays-Fridays. The probability for a positive PCR test was lowest on Mondays. This implies that there were different testing criteria and/or different test-seeking behaviour on different weekdays. Though the probability of testing positive clearly changed over time, we cannot in general conclude that this occurred as a direct consequence of changes in testing policies. It is natural for the testing criteria to change during a pandemic. Though smaller changes in testing criteria do not seem to have large, abrupt consequences for the disease surveillance, larger changes like the introduction and massive use of self-tests makes the test data less useful for surveillance.

Use of strips of rapid diagnostic tests as a source of ribonucleic acid for genomic surveillance of viruses: an example of SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to demonstrate that the genomic material of SARS-CoV-2 can be isolated from strips of COVID-19 rapid diagnostic test cassettes. METHOD: It was a prospective cross-sectional study involving patients admitted to treatment centers and sampling sites in the city of Conakry, Guinea. A total of 121 patients were double sampled, and 9 more patients were tested only for RDT. PCR was conducted according to the protocol of the RunMei kit. Sequencing was performed by using the illumina COVIDSeq protocol. Nine COVID-19 RDTs without nasopharyngeal swabs were in addition tested. RESULT: Among the 130 COVID-19 RDTs, forty-seven were macroscopically positive, whereas seventy-two were positive according to PCR using RDT strip, while among the 121 VTM swabs, sixty-four were positive. Among eighty-three negative COVID-19 RDTs, twenty-seven were positive by PCR using RDT strip with a geometric mean Ct value of 32.49 cycles. Compared to those of PCR using VTM, the sensitivity and specificity of PCR using RDT strip were estimated to be 100% and 85.96%, respectively, with 93.39% test accuracy. Among the fifteen COVID-19 RDT extracts eligible for sequencing, eleven had sequences identical to those obtained via the standard method, with coverage between 75 and 99.6%. CONCLUSION: These results show that COVID-19 RDTs can be used as biological material for the genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2.

Evaluation of Self-collected Saliva Samples Without Viral Transport Media for SARS-CoV-2 Testing via RT-PCR and Comparison of Amplicon Sequences Against Commonly Used Primers in Diagnostic Assays.

INTRODUCTION: Mass screening for SARS-CoV-2 using nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) is costly, uncomfortable for patients, and increases the chance of virus exposure to health care workers. Therefore, this study focused on determining if self-collected unpreserved saliva can be an effective alternative to NPS collection in COVID-19 surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, patients being tested for SARS-CoV-2 using NPS were asked to provide a saliva sample to compare their results. NPS samples were evaluated for SARS-CoV-2 using BioFire® FilmArray® Torch® or Cepheid® GeneXpert® systems while saliva samples were evaluated using an in-house developed reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) which targeted the Envelope (E) and Nucleocapsid (N) genes. RESULTS: Detection of SARS-CoV-2 using self-collected saliva was found to be only slightly less accurate (<5%) than testing using NPS. In addition, initial saliva RT-PCR identified 27 positive subjects, 18 of which provided amplicons sufficient for confirmatory sequencing. The sequencing data showed a genetic shift in the virus within our population sometime between 22 June and July 8, 2021 from Alpha to Delta variant. CONCLUSIONS: The saliva sample collection method identifies the E gene in SARS COVID-2 samples which provides an alternative specimen source to the NPS. This identifies the S gene and ORF1ab. Saliva collection is more convenient to the patient, yields comparable results to NPS collection, and potentially increases Covid-19 surveillance.